Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Part A
(a)
Carrying amount of assets of CGU $2,094
Recoverable amount of assets of CGU 1,860
Total impairment loss 234
Allocated to goodwill 234
Allocated to other assets $ 0
(b)
Tangible assets, net $1,164
Recognized intangible assets, net 510
Internally developed patent 0
Goodwill (420 – 234) 186
Total $1,860
Part B
(a)
Carrying amount of assets of CGU $2,094
Recoverable amount of assets of CGU 1,450
Total impairment loss 644
Assigned to goodwill 420
Assigned to other assets on a proportionate basis as follows: $224
% Before Loss After
Tangible assets, net 69.5 $1,164 $156 $1,008
Recognized intangible assets, net 30.5 510 68 442
Total 100.0 $1,674 $224 $1,450
(b)
Tangible assets, net $1,008
Recognized intangible assets, net 442
Internally developed patent 0
Goodwill (420 – 420) 0
Total $1,450
Part C
Tangible assets, net $1,174
Recognized intangible assets, net 520
Internally developed patent 60
Goodwill 106
Total $1,860
When allocating the acquisition cost at the date of acquisition, identifiable net assets are measured
at fair value and any amount paid over the fair value of identifiable net assets is allocated to
goodwill. Fair value accounting is used for identifiable assets.
When checking for impairment at any reporting date subsequent to the date of acquisition, the
assets are reported at the lesser of carrying amount and recoverable amount. In most cases,
identifiable assets are reported at a historical cost-based amount. Fair values of the identifiable
assets are ignored.
Problem 5-2
Cost of 70% investment $770,000
Implied cost of 100% investment 1,100,000
Carrying amount of Small’s net assets = Carrying amount of Small’s shareholders’ equity
Ordinary shares $560,000
Retained earnings 260,000
820,000
Acquisition differential – Jan. 1, Year 6 $280,000
Allocated:
Inventory 71,000
Patents (90,000) (19,000)
Balance – goodwill $299,000
Balance Balance
Jan. 1 Changes Dec. 31
Year 6 Yr 6 & 7 Year 8 Year 8
Inventory $71,000 $(71,000)
Patents (90,000) 36,000 $ 18,000 $ (36,000)
Goodwill 299,000 0 (20,900) 278,100
$280,000 $(35,000) $(2,900) $242,100
PART A
Year 6 Year 7 Year 8
Investment in Small 770,000
Cash 770,000
Cash 28,700 18,200 39,200
Dividend income 28,700 18,200 39,200
PART B
(i) Goodwill (299,000 – 20,900) $278,100
(ii) Small’s ordinary shares $560,000
Small’s retained earnings (260,000 + 144,000 – 41,000 –
51,000 – 26,000 + 106,000 – 56,000) 336,000
896,000
Undepleted acquisition differential 242,100
$1,138,100
NCI’s share (30%) $341,430
(iii) Large’s retained earnings $660,000
Small’s retained earnings (260,000 + 144,000 – 41,000 -
51,000 – 26,000) 286,000
Small’s retained earnings, date of acquisition 260,000
Change since acquisition 26,000
Less: cumulative changes to acquisition differential (35,000)
Adjusted change since acquisition (9,000)
Large’s share (70%) (6,300)
Consolidated retained earnings $653,700
PART C
(i) Year 6 Year 7 Year 8
Investment in Small 770,000
Cash 770,000
Investment in Small (70% x Small’s profit) 100,800 (35,700) 74,200
Investment income 100,800 (35,700) 74,200
Cash (70% x Small’s dividends) 28,700 18,200 39,200
Investment in Small 28,700 18,200 39,200
Investment income (70% x changes to AD) 37,100 (12,600) 2,030
Investment in Small 37,100 (12,600) 2,030
(a)
Goodwill 28,000
Net income
Gros’s net income 90,000
Less: dividends from Petite (10,000 x 70%) (7,000)
83,000
Petite’s net income 48,000
Less: changes to acquisition differential 4,000
44,000
Consolidated net income 127,000
Problem 5-4
(a)
Non-controlling interest 280,000 / (600,000 + 800,000) = 20%
Therefore, Corner owns 80% of Brook.
(b)
Net income of Brook – Year 4 140,000
80%
112,000
Net loss of Corner – Year 4 (60,000)
Consolidated net income attributable to Corner’s shareholders – Year 4 52,000
(c)
Consolidated retained earnings – Dec. 31, Year 4 180,000
Consolidated net income – Year 4 52,000
Corner's retained earnings Dec. 31, Year 3 (equity) 128,000
(d)
640,000 / 80% is shareholders' equity of Brook 800,000
Common shares – Brook 600,000
Retained earnings – Brook – date of acquisition 200,000
Problem 5-5
Cost of 85% investment 646,000
Implied cost of 100% investment 760,000
Carrying amount of Silk’s net assets = Carrying amount of Silk’s shareholders’ equity
Silk Common shares 500,000
Retained earnings 100,000
600,000
Acquisition differential – Dec. 31, Year 1 160,000
Allocated:
Inventory 70,000
Balance – patents 90,000
Non-controlling interest (15% x 760,000) 114,000 (a)
Balance Balance
Dec. 31 Changes Dec. 31
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 3
Inventory 70,000 -70,000
Patents 90,000 -9,000 -9,000 72,000
160,000 -79,000 -9,000 72,000
(a)
Non-controlling interest in profit
(b)
Year 2 Year 3
Profit (loss) Pen 28,000 (45,000)
Dividends from Silk
Year 2 0
Year 3 (85% 15,000) (12,750)
28,000 (57,750)
Share of Silk’s profit
85% (30,000 – 79,000) (41,650)
85% (52,000 – 9,000) _ 36,550_
Consolidated profit (loss) attributable to Pen’s shareholders (13,650) (21,200)
(c)
Retained earnings Pen – Dec. 31, Year 3 (cost method) 91,000
Retained earnings Silk – Dec. 31, Year 3
(100,000 + 30,000 + 52,000 – 15,000) 167,000
Acquisition retained earnings 100,000
Increase since acquisition 67,000
Less: changes to acq. diff. to date (79,000 + 9,000) 88,000
Adjusted increase since acquisition (21,000) (a)
85% (17,850)
Consolidated retained earnings – Dec. 31, Year 3 73,150
(d)
Method 1:
Silk – Common shares 500,000
Retained earnings Dec. 31, Year 3 167,000
667,000
Undepleted acquisition differential 72,000
739,000
15%
Non-controlling interest – Dec. 31, Year 3 110,850
Method 2:
Non-controlling interest – date of acquisition (a) 114,000
Retained earnings Silk – Dec. 31, Year 3
(100,000 + 30,000 + 52,000 – 15,000) 167,000
Acquisition retained earnings 100,000
Increase since acquisition 67,000
Less: changes to acq. diff. to date (79,000 + 9,000) 88,000
(21,000)
NCI’s share 15% (3,150)
Non-controlling interest – Dec. 31, Year 3 110,850
(e)
Cost of investment 646,000
Retained earnings Silk – Dec. 31, Year 3
(100,000 + 30,000 + 52,000 – 15,000) 167,000
Acquisition retained earnings 100,000
Increase since acquisition 67,000
Less: changes to acq. diff. to date (79,000 + 9,000) 88,000
(21,000)
85% (17,850)
Invest. account – equity method as at Dec. 31, Year 3 628,150
(f)
See changes to acq. Diff. schedule above.
Alternative calculation:
Problem 5-6
The following answers were determined using the 2017 financial statements of Empire
Company Limited and are in millions of dollars:
(a) As per note 3(b), Goodwill arising on acquisition is recognized as an asset and
represents the excess of acquisition cost over the fair value of the Company’s share of
the identifiable net assets of the acquiree at the date of the acquisition. Therefore,
Empire is using the identifiable net assets method of consolidation to value the non-
controlling interest at the date of acquisition.
(b) As per note 1, the consolidated financial statements include subsidiary companies and
certain enterprises considered structured entities (“SEs”), where control is achieved on a
basis other than through ownership of a majority of voting rights. As per note 3(a), SEs
are entities controlled by the Company which were designed so that voting or similar
rights are not the dominant factor in deciding who controls the entity. SEs are
consolidated if, based on an evaluation of the substance of its relationship with the
Company, the Company concludes that it controls the SE. SEs controlled by the
Company were established under terms that impose strict limitations on the decision
making powers of the SEs management and that results in the Company receiving the
majority of the benefits related to the SEs operations and net assets, being exposed to
the majority of risks incident to the SEs activities, and retaining the majority of the
residual or ownership risks related to the SEs or their assets.
(c) Non-controlling interest is 1.6% (58.5 / 3,702.7) of shareholders’ equity as per the
consolidated balance sheet. Approximately 8.1% (14 / 172.5) of the company’s net
earnings is attributable to non-controlling interest as per the consolidated statement of
earnings.
(d) As per note 11, the portion of additions to intangible assets arising from acquisitions was
12.7% (3.5 / [3.5 + 24.1]) and the portion arising from direct purchases was 87.3%.
(e) The goodwill impairment loss for 2016 was $2,878.5 million and $.9 million for 2017 as
per note 12. The primary reasons for the loss in 2016, as per note 12, operational
challenges the Company had experienced under the Safeway banner, the outcome of
the property and equipment impairment test, and the overall challenging economic
climate mainly in the Alberta and Saskatchewan markets.
(f) As per note 12, management determined the recoverable amount of the CGUs based on
VIU calculations which require the use of certain key assumptions. VIU was calculated
from cash flow projections for five years using financial data from the Company’s most
up-to-date internal forecasts and budgets that were formally approved by management.
The key assumptions used in the forecasts were cash flows for the first five years,
growth rate beyond five years, pre-tax discount rate and operating margins,
(g) The performance bonuses will be reduced in 2016 due to the immediate effect of the
impairment loss on net income. However, the performance bonuses in future years may
be improved because there is less goodwill to be written down.
(h) The discount rates incorporate the risk associated with future cash flows; the higher the
uncertainty of future cash flows, the higher the discount rate. When the discount rates
increase, the present value of future cash flows decrease, which would cause a
decrease in the recoverable amount of the goodwill and thus the recognition of an
impairment loss.
(i) Goodwill, goodwill impairment losses and non-controlling interest would be higher under
the fair value enterprise method because they include the non-controlling interest’s
share of the subsidiary’s goodwill. Net income would have been lower due to a larger
goodwill impairment loss. Equity would also be higher because NCI is higher. It is likely
that the impact on the numerator would be more substantial than the impact on the
denominator to cause an overall reduction in the return on total shareholders’ equity.
Problem 5-7
Grant NCI
(a)
Acquisition 30,000
Increase 35,000
80% 28,000
313,600
18,400
12,800
242,800
Total 433,000
Attributable to:
247,000
Grant Corporation
Goodwill 10,000
1,119,000
incursion. 1,119,000
Note 1:
92,000
22,000
Balance Balance
Jan. 1 Changes in Dec. 31
Year 4 Year 4 Year 5 Year 5
Investment in bonds $12,988 $-2,351 $-2,468 $8,169 (a)
Goodwill 217,012 -17,012 0 200,000 (b)
$230,000 $-19,363 $-2,468 $208,169
(b)
Investment in bonds (0 + 300,000 + (a) 8,169) 308,169
Goodwill (b) 200,000
(c) Cost Equity
Investment income = dividends paid 42,000
Income reported by Fazli 134,000
Changes to acquisition differential (a) (2,468)
131,532
(d) The reported consolidated balances are not affected by the parent’s method of accounting
for its investment. Thus, consolidated expenses of $1,384,000 ($674,000 + $710,000) are
the same regardless of whether the cost method or equity method is used by Cyrus. The
amortization of the premium on investment in bonds would be an adjustment to investment
revenue not expenses.
(e) The reported consolidated balance of $308,169 as calculated in (b) is not affected by the
parent’s method of accounting for its investment.
(f) Cost Equity
Retained earnings, January 1, Year 5, cost method 814,000
Parent’s retained earnings, January 1, Year 5, cost method 814,000
Subsidiary’s change in retained earnings since acquisition
(250,000 – 200,000) x parent’s share of 100% 50,000
Cumulative changes to acquisition differential (Year 4) (19,363)
Parent’s retained earnings, January 1, Year 5, equity method 844,637
(g)
Consolidated retained earnings at January 1, Year 5 are $844,637. It is equal to the parent’s
retained earnings under the equity method as calculated in (f). It is not affected by the method
used by the parent to account for its investment in the subsidiary for internal record keeping.
Problem 5-9
(a)
Cost of 80% investment 122,080
Implied value of 100% 152,600
Carrying amount of Little’s net assets = Carrying amount of Little’s shareholders’ equity
– July 1, Year 5
Common shares 54,000
Retained earnings 32,400
86,400
Acquisition differential 66,200
Allocated: FV – CA
Government contract 50,000
Equipment (21,600)
28,400
Balance – goodwill 37,800
Big
Consolidated Income Statement
for the Year Ended June 30, Year 6
Big
Consolidated Retained Earnings Statement
for the Year Ended June 30, Year 6
Balance July 1, Year 5 459,000
Net income 110,276
569,276
Dividends 32,400
Balance June 30, Year 6 536,876
Big
Consolidated Balance Sheet
June 30, Year 6
1,153,460
(d)
Total Parent NCI
100% 80% 20%
Total value of Little at date of acquisition 147,080 122,080 25,000
Carrying amount of Little’s net assets 86,400 69,120 17,280
Acquisition differential 60,680 52,960 7,720
Fair value excess for identifiable assets 28,400 22,720 5,680
Balance – goodwill, date of acquisition 32,280 30,240 2,040
Goodwill impairment for the year 12,280 11,504* 776
Goodwill, June 30, Year 6 20,000 18,736 1,264
* 12,280 x (30,240 / 32,280)
Problem 5-10
Cost of 80% of Storm $350,000
Implied value of 100% $437,500
Carrying amount of Storm’s net assets
= Carrying amount of Storm’s shareholders’ equity
Ordinary shares $240,000
Retained earnings 64,000
304,000
Acquisition differential $133,500
Allocated: FV – CA
Plant assets $44,000
Trademarks 36,000 80,000
Goodwill $53,500
Bal Changes Bal
Dec. 31/Yr2 to Dec.31/Yr5 Yr6 Yr6 Dec. 31/Yr6
Amort Impairment
Plant assets $44,000 $-16,500 $ -5,500 $22,000
Trademarks 36,000 -9,000 -3,000 $-9,650 14,350
Goodwill 53,500 ----- ----- -3,500 50,000
$133,500 $-25,500 $-8,500 $-13,150 $86,350
Palm Inc.
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position
December 31, Year 6
(i) The return on equity would decrease because net income would decrease by $23,350
(($39,500 - $13,150) + ($5,500 - $8,500)) i.e., the change in the acquisition differential
for Year 6 and total shareholders’ equity would only decrease by $14,350 ($86,350 -
$72,000) i.e., the change in undepleted acquisition differential at the end of the year.
(ii) The debt to equity ratio would increase because debt would not change but total
shareholders’ equity would decrease.
Problem 5-11
Cost of 80% investment – July 1, Year 4 543,840
Implied value of 100% investment 679,800
Carrying amount of Bondi’s net assets
Assets 936,000
Liabilities 307,200
628,800
Acquisition differential 51,000
Allocated: FV – CA
Accounts receivable 24,004
Inventory 48,000
Plant assets (90,000)
Bonds payable 13,466 (4,530)
Balance – goodwill 55,530
Bond Carrying
Cash Interest Premium Amount
Date Paid Expense Amortization of Bonds
July 1/ Year 4 $186,534
Dec 31/ Year 4 $6,0001 $7,4612 $1,4613 187,9954
June 30, Year 5 6,000 7,520 1,520 189,515
Dec 31/ Year 5 6,000 7,580 1,580 191,095
June 30, Year 6 6,000 7,644 1,644 192,739
Dec 31/ Year 6 6,000 7,710 1,710 194,449
1 2
$200,000 x 6% x 6/12 = $6,000 $186,534 x 4% = $7,461
3
$7,461 – $6,000 = $1,461 4
$186,534 + $1,461 = $187,995
1,099
(a)
Aaron Co.
Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, Year 6
Income Statement
Sales (1,261,000 + 1,200,000) 2,461,000
Income – other investments 25,000
2,486,000
Raw materials used (880,000 + 1,005,000) 1,885,000
Change in inventory (-40,000 + 15,000) (25,000)
Depreciation (60,000 + 54,000 – 6,000) 108,000
Interest (37,000 + 26,400 + 3,354) 66,754
Other (227,000 + 91,200) 318,200
Goodwill impairment 5,553
2,358,507
Profit 127,493
Attributable to:
Aaron’s shareholders (= profit under equity method) 126,394
Non-controlling interest 1,099
127,493
(c)
Problem 5-12
Total Rabb NCI
100% 75% 25%
Consideration given for share ownership 152,000 117,000 35,000
Carrying amount of Rabb’s net assets
= Carrying amount of Rabb’s shareholders’ equity
– common shares 50,000
– retained earnings 30,000
80,000 60,000 20,000
Acquisition differential 72,000 57,000 15,000
Allocated:
Inventory (11,000)
Equipment 24,000
Software 15,000
28,000 21,000 7,000
Goodwill 44,000 36,000 8,000
(a)
(b)
Goodwill impairment loss – fair value enterprise method (19,636 + 4,364) 24,000
(c)
If Foxx had used the identifiable net assets method rather than the fair value enterprise method,
the debt to equity ratio would have increased because shareholders’ equity would have
decreased due to the decrease in non-controlling interest while debt would remain the same.
Problem 5-13
Cost of 80% investment $3,300,000
Implied value of 100% $4,125,000
Carrying amount of Silver’s net assets = Carrying amount of Silver’s shareholders’ equity
Common shares $2,050,000
Retained earnings 445,000
2,495,000
Acquisition differential $1,630,000
Allocated:
Inventory (20%) $326,000
Equipment (40%) 652,000 978,000
Balance – goodwill (40%) $652,000
NCI (20% x 4,125,000) 825,000 (a)
(a)
Pearl Company
Consolidated Income Statement
for the Year Ended December 31, Year 6
Pearl Company
Consolidated Retained Earnings Statement
for the Year Ended December 31, Year 6
Pearl Company
Consolidated Balance Sheet
December 31, Year 6
(b)
Goodwill impairment loss – fair value enterprise method $29,000
Less: NCI’s share @ 20% 5,800
Goodwill impairment loss – identifiable net assets method $23,200
(d)
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT WORKING PAPER
PEARL
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, Year 6
Eliminations
PEARL SILVER Dr. Cr. Consolidated
Income Statements - Year 6
Sales $ 4,450,000 $1,450,00 $5,900,000
Dividend income 232,000 0 2 $ 232,000 0
4,682,000 1,450,000 5,900,000
Cost of sales 2,590,000 490,000 7 81,500 3,161,500
Miscellaneous expenses 365,000 79,000 444,000
Administrative expense 89,000 19,000 7 29,000 137,000
Income tax expense 295,000 165,000 460,000
Total expenses 3,339,000 753,000 4,202,500
Net income $ 1,343,000 $ 697,000 $1,697,500
Attributable to:
Pearl's Shareholders $1,580,200
Non-controlling interest 8 117,300 117,300
$459,800 $ - $1,697,500
Retained Earnings Statements-Year
6
Balance, January 1 $ 3,800,000 $890,000 1 $196,200
4 890,000 $3,603,800
Net income 1,343,000 697,000 459,800 1,580,200
5,143,000 1,587,000 5,184,000
Dividends 590,000 290,000 2 $ 232,000 590,000
1
0 58,000
$1,297,00 $1,546,00
Balance, December 31 $4,553,000 0 0 $ 290,000 $4,594,000
Statement of Financial Position-December 31,
Year 6
$ $
Cash
390,000 190,000 $ 580,000
$
Accounts receivable 0
290,000 8 84,000 206,000
Inventory 2,450,000 510,000 2,960,000
$
Plant and equipment 3,590,000
3,450,000 5 652,000 6 69,000 7,623,000
Accumulated
depreciation (840,000) (400,000) 6 69,000 5 285,250 (1,537,750)
7 81,500
Investment in Silver
Company 3,300,000 0 3 775,950 1 196,200 0
4 3,879,750
Acquisition differential 0 0 4 939,750 5 939,750 0
Goodwill 0 0 5 573,000 7 29,000 544,000
$ $3,890,00
9,040,000 0 $10,375,250
$ $ $
Liabilities
737,000 543,000 8 84,000 1,196,000
Common shares 3,750,000 2,050,000 4 2,050,000 3,750,000
Retained earnings 4,553,000 1,297,000 1,546,000 290,000 4,594,000
1
Non-controlling interest
0 58,000 9 117,300 835,250
3 775,950
$ $3,890,00
9,040,000 0 $10,375,250
$6,747,70 $6,747,70
0 0
JOURNAL ENTRIES
5 Equipment 652,000
Accumulated depreciation 285,250
Goodwill 573,000
Acquisition differential 939,750
To allocate the acquisition differential at beginning of year
$
Total of debits and credits 6,747,700 $ 6,747,700
Note
s
a Consolidated retained earnings, beginning of Year 6
$
(= Pearl's retained earnings, beginning of Year 6 under equity method) 3,603,800
Pearl's retained earnings, beginning of Year 6 under cost method 3,800,000
$
Difference between cost and equity method, beginning of Year 6 (196,200)
$
b NCI, end of Year 6 835,250
Less: NCI's share of consolidated net income for Year 6 (117,300)
Add: NCI's share of Silver's dividends for Year 6 (20% x 290,000) 58,000
$
NCI, beginning of Year 6 775,950
Problem 5-14
Cost of 80% investment 272,000
Implied value of 100% investment 340,000
Carrying amount of Bach’s net assets = Carrying amount of Bach’s shareholders’ equity
Common shares 200,000
Retained earnings 30,000
230,000
Acquisition differential 110,000
Allocated: FV – CA
Inventory (50,000 – 20,000) 30,000
Land (45,000 – 25,000) 20,000
Equipment (78,000 – 60,000) 18,000
Misc. intangibles (42,000 – 0) 42,000 110,000
Goodwill 0
Non-controlling interest (20% x 340,000) 68,000 (a)
(b)
Albeniz Company
Consolidated Balance Sheet
December 31, Year 6
Brady Ltd.
Consolidated Income Statement
for the Year Ended December 31, Year 6
Sales (10,100,000 + 5,100,000) $15,200,000
Cost of goods purchased (6,950,000 + 2,910,000) 9,860,000
Change in inventory (72,000 + 120,000) 192,000
Depreciation expense (920,000 + 402,000) 1,322,000
Patent amortization (120,000 + 52,000) 172,000
Interest expense (490,000 + 310,000 – 32,000) 768,000
Other expense (700,000 + 870,000) 1,570,000
Goodwill impairment loss 18,000
Income tax (620,000 + 160,000) 780,000
14,682,000
Profit $518,000
Attributable to:
Brady’s shareholders = profit under equity method $484,000
Non-controlling interest [20% (208,000 – 38,000)] 34,000
$518,000
Brady Ltd.
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position
December 31, Year 6
Plant and equipment (8,200,000 + 5,200,000) $13,400,000
Patents (720,000 + 364,000) 1,084,000
Goodwill 290,000
Inventory (4,800,000 + 2,000,000) 6,800,000
Accounts receivable (1,100,000 + 1,400,000) 2,500,000
Cash (420,000 + 620,000) 1,040,000
$25,114,000
(b)
Only retained earnings and investment in Partridge would be different.
The investment in Partridge would be $4,320,000, which is the original acquisition cost of the
investment. This represents a decrease of $264,000 ($4,584,000 – $4,320,000) from the
balance under the equity method.
Retained earnings under the cost method would also be decreased by $264,000. It would
change from $6,382,000 under the equity method to $6,118,000 ($6,382,000 - $264,000) under
the cost method.
(c)
(in 000s) Equity Cost Consolidation
Current assets $6,320 $6,320 $10,340
Current liabilities $3,522 $3,522 $5,062
Current ratio 1.79 1.79 2.04
* $484 – equity method income of $136 + dividend income of $110 x 80% = $436
(d)
The consolidation method shows the highest liquidity because it had the highest current
ratio.
The consolidation method shows the highest risk of insolvency because it had the
highest debt-to-equity ratio.
The equity method reported the highest profitability because it had the highest return on
equity
(e)
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT WORKING PAPER
BRADY
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, YEAR 6
Eliminations
PARTRIDG Consolidate
BRADY E Dr. Cr. d
Income Statements - Year 6
Sales $ $ $
10,100,000 5,100,000 15,200,000
Equity method
income 136,000 1 136,000 0
10,236,000 5,100,000 15,200,000
Cost of goods
purchased 6,950,000 2,910,000 9,860,000
Change in inventory 72,000 120,000 192,000
Depreciation
expense 920,000 402,000 1,322,000
Patent amortization
expense 0 120,000 5 52,000 172,000
Interest expense 5
490,000 310,000 32,000 768,000
Other expenses 700,000 870,000 1,570,000
Goodwill impairment
loss 0 0 5 18,000 18,000
Income taxes 620,000 160,000 780,000
Total expenses 9,752,000 4,892,000 14,682,000
$ $ $
Net income 484,000 208,000 518,000
Attributable to:
Brady's $
Shareholders 484,000
Non-controlling
interest 6 34,000 34,000
$ $ $
Total 240,000 32,000 518,000
Retained Earnings Statements - Year 6
$ $
Balance, January 1 5,898,000 3,181,000 3 3,181,000 5,898,000
Abov
Net income 484,000 208,000 e 240,000 32,000 484,000
6,382,000 3,389,000 6,382,000
1
Dividends 0 110,000 88,000 0
7
22,000
Balance, December $ $ Total $ $ $
31 6,382,000 3,279,000 3,421,000 142,000 6,382,000
Statement of Financial Position - December 31,
Year 6
Plant and equipment $ $ $
(net) 8,200,000 5,200,000 13,400,000
5
Patents (net) 720000
0 4 416,000 52,000 1,084,000
Goodwill 5
0 0 4 308,000 18,000 290,000
Investment in
Partridge (equity 1
method) 4,584,000 0 2 1,134,000 48,000 0
3
5,670,000
Acquisition 4
differential 0 0 3 468,000 468,000 0
Inventory 4,800,000 2,000,000 6,800,000
Accounts receivable 1,100,000 1,400,000 2,500,000
Cash 420,000 620,000 1,040,000
$ $ $
19,104,000 9,940,000 25,114,000
$ $ $
Ordinary shares
5,100,000 2,021,000 3 2,021,000 5,100,000
Abov
Retained earnings
6,382,000 3,279,000 e 3,421,000 142,000 6,382,000
Non-controlling 2
interest 0 0 7 22,000 1,134,000 1,146,000
6
34,000
4
Bonds payable
4,100,000 3,100,000 5 32,000 256,000 7,424,000
Accounts payable 3,522,000 1,540,000 5,062,000
$ $ $
19,104,000 9,940,000 25,114,000
$ $7,822,00
7,822,000 0
JOURNAL ENTRIES
4 Patents 416,000
Goodwill 308,000
Bonds payable 256,000
Acquisition differential 468,000
To allocate the acquisition differential at the beginning of the year
Notes
$1,146,00
a NCI, end of Year 6 0
Less: NCI's share of consolidated net income for Year 6 -34,000
Add: NCI's share of Partridges’ dividends for Year 6 (20% x 110,000) 22,000
NCI, beginning of Year 6 $1,134,000