Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 s2.0 S1773224722006645 Main
1 s2.0 S1773224722006645 Main
A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T
Keywords: Curcumin is one of the major ingredients derived from turmeric (Curcuma Longa Linn). For many years, cur
Drug release cumin was used in Indian traditional medicine to treat several diseases. It has anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer,
Curcumin and anti-diabetic activities. In addition, curcumin has a low aqueous solubility of 0.00575 mg/mL, which has
Piperine
been associated with its poor release profile. The aim of this study is to improve the release profile of curcumin
Amorphous solid dispersion
Hot-melt extrusion
utilizing the hot-melt extrusion technique (HME) to prepare curcumin-piperine solid dispersion (SD). Three
physical mixtures of curcumin, piperine, and Soluplus® were prepared with different ratios between the com
positions. Two different extrusion temperatures (130 ◦ C and 140 ◦ C) were applied during the extrusion step.
Drug release studies for the pure compounds and the extrudates were performed using the USP apparatus II, and
the samples were analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Curcumin-piperine solid
dispersion was successfully prepared by hot-melt extrusion technology. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC)
results showed the presence of endothermic peaks, one for curcumin at 179 ◦ C, and another for piperine at
132 ◦ C. However, these peaks were not observed in the extrudates thermograms, indicating the solubilization of
curcumin and piperine within the polymeric carrier at an amorphous state. The release studies revealed sig
nificant improvement in curcumin release profiles for up to 9-folds in the formulations, compared to pure
curcumin.
* Corresponding author. Department of Pharmaceutics and Drug Delivery, University of Mississippi, School of Pharmacy, MS, 38677, USA.
** Corresponding author.
E-mail address: marepka@olemiss.edu (M.A. Repka).
URL: http://eashour@olemiss.edu (E.A. Ashour).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2022.103753
Received 16 June 2022; Received in revised form 24 August 2022; Accepted 26 August 2022
Available online 31 August 2022
1773-2247/© 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
A.A. Althobaiti et al. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology 76 (2022) 103753
2
A.A. Althobaiti et al. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology 76 (2022) 103753
Fig. 2. Physical appearance of the extrudates; (a) F1 at 130 ◦ C, (b) F1 at 140 ◦ C, (c) F2 at 130 ◦ C, (d) F2 at 140 ◦ C, (e) F3 at 130 ◦ C, and (f) F3 at 140 ◦ C.
and the interactions between the components were evaluated. min ranging from 20 ◦ C to 200 ◦ C. The weights of the samples were
between 3 and 6 mg, and the weighed samples were placed in aluminum
2. Materials and methods pans. TRIOS software was used to analyze the thermograms of the
samples.
2.1. Materials
3.3. Thermalgravimetric analysis (TGA)
Curcumin and piperine were purchased from Fisher Scientific (Fair
Lawn, NJ, USA) and Sigma-Aldrich (Milwaukee, WI, USA), respectively. Thermalgravimetric analysis were performed for curcumin, piperine,
Soluplus® was obtained as a gift from BASF-SE (Ludwigshafen, Ger and Soluplus® to investigate their thermal stability using PerkinElmer
many). All other chemicals and solvents were of analytical grade and Pyris 1 TGA equipped with Pyris software (PerkinElmer Life and
were purchased from Fisher Scientific (Fair Lawn, NJ, USA). Analytical Science, Shelton, CT, USA). The sample weight of the starting
materials (curcumin, piperine, and Soluplus®) was approximately 8–20
3. Methods mg. The samples were heated from 30 ◦ C to 400 ◦ C with a heating rate of
18 ◦ C/min.
3.1. Hot-melt extrusion
3.4. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
Three physical mixtures were prepared with different ratio between
the components (curcumin, piperine, and Soluplus®), as seen in Table 2. Surface morphologies of all extrudates were characterized using a
The V-shell blender was used to blend the physical mixtures for 10 min JSM-7200FLV Field-Emission Scanning Electron Microscope (JOEL,
(Patterson-Kelley twin shell dry blender). The mixtures were then Peabody, MA, USA) with an accelerating voltage of 5 kV and 10 kV with
extruded using the co-rotating twin-screw extruder (11 mm twin screw a magnification of 50X to 500X. The samples were mounted on a carbon
extruder, Thermo Fisher Scientific) with a screw configuration consist pad, placed on an aluminum stub and sputter-coated with platinum
ing of four conveying zones and three mixing zones. The extrusion step under an argon atmosphere using a fully automated Denton Desk V TSC
was performed using two extrusion temperatures (130 ◦ C and 140 ◦ C), Sputter Coater (Denton Vacuum, Moorestown, NJ, USA) prior to
with a feeding rate of 1 g/min, and a screw speed of 75 rpm. The same imaging.
extrusion parameters were used for all formulations.
3.5. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR)
3.2. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC)
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (Agilent Cary 630 with a
The physical states of the components before and after the extrusion DTGS detector) was performed to study the interactions between the
process were evaluated using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) components. The weighed samples (2–4 mg) were analyzed using a
(TA instruments DSC 25 Discovery series) with a heating rate of 10 ◦ C/ scanning range from 1000 to 4000 cm− 1with a resolution of 1 cm− 1.
3
A.A. Althobaiti et al. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology 76 (2022) 103753
The release study for pure curcumin, and piperine, and the formu
lations F1, F2, and F3 which were extruded at 130 ◦ C and 140 ◦ C, were
conducted in a dissolution medium of 900 mL 0.1 N HCL (pH 1.2), with
0.1% sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS), and a paddle speed of 100 rpm, using
the USP apparatus II. The temperature of the medium was maintained at
37 ◦ C during the study. A sample volume of 2 ml was taken at pre
determined time points (15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 min), and
2 mL of fresh medium was added each time to maintain the volume at
900 mL. The samples were centrifuged for 10 min at 13,000 rpm, then
the supernatants were analyzed using the HPLC [31]. All dissolution
experiments were conducted in triplicates. Similarity factors were
calculated to compare the drug release profiles of the different
formulations.
4
A.A. Althobaiti et al. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology 76 (2022) 103753
Fig. 5. SEM images of; a) curcumin, b) piperine, c) Soluplus®, d)F1 at 130 ◦ C, e) F1 at 140 ◦ C, f) F2 at 130 ◦ C, g) F2 at 140 ◦ C, h) F3 at 130 ◦ C, and i) F3 at 140 ◦ C.
5
A.A. Althobaiti et al. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology 76 (2022) 103753
The SEM images revealed that F1 (5% piperine, 15% curcumin, and
80% Soluplus®), and F2 (10% piperine, 30% curcumin, and 60% Sol
uplus®) had smooth surface areas without signs of crystals. This is
explained by the solubilization of the drugs within the matrix at an
amorphous state. Moreover, a crystal appearance was observed in F3,
which is due to the high drug loading (15% piperine, 45% curcumin,
40% Soluplus®), and may have exceeded the polymeric capacity. The
SEM images for F3 were inconsistent with DSC thermal analysis results,
which showed an absence of drug crystalline peaks in the extrudates.
The inconsistency could be related to the DSC limit of detection of
crystals, which is below 5% [32]. The presence of crystals in F3 can be
explained by the fact that the carrier Soluplus®, has a transition glass
temperature of 75 ◦ C, which is lower than the drugs’ melting points.
Consequently, the polymer will soften and solubilize the drugs before
reaching their melting points, preventing the appearance of crystalline
peaks (Fig. 5).
Fig. 6. FTIR analysis of the three formulations, (a) F1 with both extrusion 4.6. In-vitro drug release studies
temperatures 130 ◦ C and 140 ◦ C. (b) F2 with both extrusion temperatures
130 ◦ C and 140 ◦ C. (c) F3 with both extrusion temperatures 130 ◦ C and 140 ◦ C. The release profile of pure curcumin had percentage of drug release
approximately 13% due to its low aqueous solubility. Furthermore,
formulations F1, F2, and F3 at both extrusion temperatures showed a
significant increase in curcumin release for up to 9-folds compared to the
6
A.A. Althobaiti et al. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology 76 (2022) 103753
Fig. 8. The release profiles for all formulations; (a) F1 at 130 ◦ C and 140 ◦ C, (c) Fig. 9. Results of drug release studies to assess the stability of the formulations
F2 at 130 ◦ C and 140 ◦ C, (c) F3 at 130 ◦ C and 140 ◦ C. at the third month; (a) F1 at 130 ◦ C and 140 ◦ C, (b) F2 at 130 ◦ C and 140 ◦ C, (c)
F3 at 130 ◦ C and 140 ◦ C.
pure compound. Formulation F1 at both extrusion temperatures had a
percent drug release of 93%, which was the highest. This can be affected the drug release profile, indicating that a portion of the drug is
explained by the high ratio of Soluplus® (80%) in the formulation. still in the crystal form or is not completely dissolved within the carrier,
Moreover, the percent drug release in F2 at both extrusion temperature as seen in Fig. 8. A significant improvement in the release profile of
130 ◦ C and 140 ◦ C, were 86% and 77%, respectively. The increase of piperine was observed in formulation F1, in which it was 100% at
drug loading in formulation F3 (45% curcumin and 15% piperine) 130 ◦ C, and 94% at 140 ◦ C, compared to pure piperine (75%).
7
A.A. Althobaiti et al. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology 76 (2022) 103753
5. Conclusion
Fig. 11. Percent drug content; a) curcumin and b) piperine during the stability study.
8
A.A. Althobaiti et al. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology 76 (2022) 103753