Professional Documents
Culture Documents
What are the two methods used in accounting for uncollectible accounts?
1. Direct write off method
2. Allowance method (estimation)
Make the necessary calculations and journal entries to record the events associated with the
accounts receivables, using these two methods.
Estimation = 7000*0,01+3000*0,05+2000*0,15 = €520
€520-€220=€300
Not possible.
The allowance method properly states the value for accounts receivable at all times.
Make the necessary calculations and journal entries to record the events associated with the notes
receivables.
11000*0,06*9/12 = €495
Task 14:
a. Allowance based
b.
Account Debit Credit
Bad debts expense 10,750
Allowance 10,750
c.
Account
Debit Credit
Bad debts expense 12,750
Allowance 12,750
d.
Account
Debit Credit
Allowance 3,000
Accounts
receivable 3,000
e.
Account
Debit Credit
Bad debts expense 3,000
Accounts 3,000
receivable
f. Contra account. It is a part of the statement of financial position.
Task 15:
Would you expect, ex ante, Ahold and Delhaize to have a significant amount of receivables? Looking
at the balance sheet amounts, are your expectations confirmed?
I would expect a lot of accounts receivables in their b2b transactions, but not that much in their b2c
transactions. They do have quite a lot of receivables.
How do Ahold and Delhaize determine their allowance for doubtful accounts? Refer to Note
17 for Ahold and Note 14 for Delhaize.
Delhaize: Calculated rate for aging–for major customers, there is an analyzed rate and for minor
groups, they are clustered to groups and assigned a rate.
Ahold: They have a provision for each time period, namely 2, 2, 2, and 14. This totals up to 20 of the
total.
How much is the allowance for doubtful accounts in 2015 for the two companies? How much was
utilized in 2015? Prepare the journal entries for the allowance for doubtful accounts and the write-
off of uncollectible accounts in 2015 for both companies.
Ahold:
Account Debit Credit 11 mil: released/changed to income (increased
Bad debts expense 11 mil allowance)
Allowance 11 mil 11 mil: used (decreases allowance)
Delhaize:
Account Debit Credit
10 mil: addition (increases allowance)
Bad debts expense 10 mil
4 mil: usage (decreases allowance)
Allowance 10 mil
Delhaize:
1. 10/24395=0.00041
2. 10/640=0.0156
3. 47/640=0.0734
Calculate the accounts receivables turnover and the average collection period in days for the
accounts receivables.
Formulas:
Net credit sales/average net accounts receivable = accounts receivable turnover
Days in year/accounts receivable turnover = average collection period in days
Compare the ratios that you calculated under (5) and (6) for the two companies. What do
you see?
Ahold has more liquid assets than Delhaize. It is thus easier for Ahold to convert their liquid assets
into cash, which results in a higher accounts receivable turnover and a lower average collection
period.
7. How does being more aggressive or conservative affect the financial statements? What could
be reasons that these two companies differ in the reporting of their receivables? Think about
differences in customer types, collection methods, and incentives that managers may have.
Ahold has a more aggressive approach which results in more collection of accounts receivables than
Delhaize. But the conservative approach that Delhaize uses results in more assets.
Ahold’s managers could receive a bonus if their cash flow statement is higher, which leads to the
managers being more aggressive when it comes to collecting receivables.
Delhaize’s managers could receive a bonus if their assets are higher, which leads to the managers
being less aggressive when it comes to collecting receivables.
Task 16:
1:C €7500-€1100 = €6400
2:A
3:C
4:D 0.04*160,000+0.1*32,000+0.21*8,000 = €11,280
€200,000 - €11,280 = €188,720