Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Figures Finals

    Uploaded by

    Sonntagsschule St. Antonius Kloster in Kröffelbach
    6 views15 pages
    This document contains data from a study comparing flexible ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treating kidney stones. It presents mean ages, BMIs, stone sizes, procedure times, complication rates, stone-free rates, and other metrics for patients receiving each treatment. In general, flexible ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy had shorter procedure times but higher complication rates, while extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy had longer procedure times but lower complication rates. Both treatments achieved similar stone-free rates overall.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Figures finals

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document contains data from a study comparing flexible ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treating kidney stones. It presents mean ages, BMIs, stone sizes, procedure times, complication rates, stone-free rates, and other metrics for patients receiving each treatment. In general, flexible ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy had shorter procedure times but higher complication rates, while extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy had longer procedure times but lower complication rates. Both treatments achieved similar stone-free rates overall.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views15 pages

    Figures Finals

    Uploaded by

    Sonntagsschule St. Antonius Kloster in Kröffelbach
    This document contains data from a study comparing flexible ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treating kidney stones. It presents mean ages, BMIs, stone sizes, procedure times, complication rates, stone-free rates, and other metrics for patients receiving each treatment. In general, flexible ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy had shorter procedure times but higher complication rates, while extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy had longer procedure times but lower complication rates. Both treatments achieved similar stone-free rates overall.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 15

    45

    40
    35
    Mean of age (years)

    30
    25
    20
    15
    10
    5
    0
    Flexible ureteroscopic laser Extracorporeal schock wave
    Lithotripsy
    30

    25
    Mean of BMI (Kg/m2)

    20

    15

    10

    0
    Flexible ureteroscopic laser Extracorporeal schock wave
    Lithotripsy
    1.4

    1.2

    1.0
    Mean of size

    0.8

    0.6

    0.4

    0.2

    0.0
    Flexible ureteroscopic laser Extracorporeal schock wave
    Lithotripsy
    80
    Mean of procedure time (min.)

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0
    Flexible ureteroscopic laser Extracorporeal schock wave
    Lithotripsy
    90
    Mean of procedure time (min.)

    80
    70
    60
    50
    40
    30
    20
    10
    0
    Flexible ureteroscopic laser Extracorporeal schock wave
    Lithotripsy (stone size ≥1.5)
    Male
    11
    73.3%

    Female
    4
    26.7%
    Male
    10
    66.7%

    Female
    5
    33.3%
    Right
    8
    53.3%

    Left
    7
    46.7%
    Right
    9
    60.0%

    Left
    6
    40.0%
    22 Flexible ureteroscopic laser
    Extracorporeal schock wave
    20
    18
    16
    14
    Percentage

    12
    10
    8
    6
    4
    2
    0
    GI GII GIII
    Complication rate (The clavien–dindo classification)
    22 Flexible ureteroscopic laser
    Extracorporeal schock wave
    20
    18
    16
    Percentage

    14
    12
    10
    8
    6
    4
    2
    0
    GI GII GIII
    Complication rate (The clavien–dindo classification)
    Flexible ureteroscopic laser
    80 Extracorporeal schock wave

    70

    60
    Percentage

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0
    Stone free rate Secondary procedure
    Flexible ureteroscopic laser
    90 Extracorporeal schock wave

    80

    70
    Percentage

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0
    Stone free rate Secondary procedure
    Flexible ureteroscopic laser Extracorporeal schock wave
    39.8 41.07

    Flexible ureteroscopic laser Extracorporeal schock wave


    26.6 26.73

    Flexible ureteroscopic laser Extracorporeal schock wave


    1.31 1.27

    Flexible ureteroscopic laser Extracorporeal schock wave


    72.07 43.53

    Flexible ureteroscopic laser Extracorporeal schock wave


    83.4 47

    Male 11
    Female 4

    Male 10
    Female 5

    Right 8
    Left 7

    Right 9
    Left 6

    Flexible ureteroscopic laser Extracorporeal schock wave


    GI 6.7 13.3
    GII 20 6.7
    GIII 6.7 6.7

    Flexible ureteroscopic laser Extracorporeal schock wave


    GI 0 16.7
    GII 20 16.7
    GIII 0 16.7
    Flexible ureteroscopic laser Extracorporeal schock wave
    Stone free rate 73.3 73.3
    Secondary procedure 26.7 13.3

    Flexible ureteroscopic laser Extracorporeal schock wave


    Stone free rate 80 66.7
    Secondary procedure 20 16.7

    You might also like