Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CASE STUDY 1
HOSPITAL PROJECT
Project Brief
Version Reason for Change Date of Approval Approver’s Name
1.0 Initial Draft 10-7-21 Ahmed Alsenosy
Project Objectives
Finish the project on time 2-7-2022
Chief the LEED Gold Certificate
Quality of the project shall as the stakeholder satisfaction -PE STANDERED
The project with the approved Cost -500 million SAR
ARCH&MEP works
Estimate Comment
Revenue 50 million
Capital 200 millions
Total Budget 500 million
CR number #100-14
Requested by
Date of request
Reasoning for We require an extra team member at 50% capacity for the final week. The
change testing scope grew due to the customers’ request of higher pass standards.
Cost delta $3,800 (25% over budget)
The testing will be complete 7 work days behind schedule due to lack of
Impact on timeline
manpower
PM’s
recommendation Approved / Denied
9. Reporting Plan –
Task Actual
Estimated Budget
ID Task Percent Budget Completion vs. Budget
Budget Percentage
Complete to Date
Transferring
the data to 45% $4,500 $2,650 58% 45% = 77.5%
7 58%
the new
system
10. QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN
The Quality Management Plan determines quality policies and procedures relevant to the project for both
project deliverables and project processes, defining who is responsible for what, and documenting the
related processes for quality planning, assurance, and control
QA/QC department shall review the Quality plan periodically with other
departments to re-affirm its adequacy and conformity to Al Moosa Specialist
Hospitals requirements. The minimum frequency for review of the Quality Plan
is once every 6 months.
Amendments to the Quality Plan are made as required to reflect the current
QA/QC program. The amendments are made by replacement of the applicable
page(s). Amendment number and date of amendment identify each amended
page.
The Quality Plan Amendments Record indicates all the amendments to the latest
issue of the Quality Plan.
+ Complete list of Quality Plan holders is retained by the QA/QC department.
Amendments and re-issue of the Quality Plan are automatically distributed to all
registered holders.
The Quality Plan Amendments Record indicates all the amendments to the latest
issue of the Quality Plan.
When the Quality Plan is revised, sections so affected shall be inserted and the
superseded sections shall be removed and destroyed. Any additions or
alterations to the text on any page shall be highlighted by underlining or by the
inclusion of a vertical line in the right hand margin.
— To ensure that the safety of personnel, the facilities and environment have
been carefully considered and that the appropriate measures have been
implemented.
— To provide for early and prompt detection of deficiencies and for timely and
effective corrective action.
Those Quality Management and related terms used in this Quality Plan are defined
below. Wherever possible, reliance is placed on Masah Quality Management and
Quality Assurance – Vocabulary, and if a term is defined therein, the definition is
quoted, with explanatory notes as relevant.
Design Control: The verification that design criteria comply with specified requirements;
that design data and methods are valid for the range of application; and that the completed
design satisfies the design criteria.
Hold Point: Work will be held until the inspection or test has been satisfactorily
completed.
Quality: The totality of characteristics of an entity that bear on its ability to satisfy
stated and implied needs.
Quality Policy: The overall intentions and direction of an organization with regard
to quality, as formally expressed by top management.
Quality Control: MASAH employs operational techniques and activities that are
used so that its operations and services conform to the quality requirements as
laid down in Al Moosa Specialist Hospitals’s documents.
Quality Assurance: All the planned and systematic activities implemented within
MASAH’s quality system, and demonstrated as needed, to provide adequate
confidence that an entity will fulfill requirements for quality.
Quality Plan: A document setting out the specific quality practices resources and
sequence of activities and relevant to a particular product, service or contract.
Quality Plan holders are assigned specific numbers for the copies retained.
Serialization and accountability is the responsibility of the Quality Management
Department. Amendments and re-issue to Quality Plan holders are also the
responsibility of Quality
Management. This Quality Plan shall be held by the following people who will be
responsible for inserting revised and removing and destroying obsolete pages.
ISSUE DATE: _
The list of holders of controlled copies of the Quality Plan include.
Project Manager
Procurement Manager
Project Engineers
QA/QC manager
Note: Additional copies of the Quality Plan shall be issued to key personnel on
a need to know basis.
Project Governance
11.1.1. Project Governance Structure
<Use the diagram below to illustrate the project governance structure, that is, which governance bodies
and layers of governance will be involved in the project (e.g. project board, steering committees).
Organizational Ahmed
Level Alsenosy
Ahmed Faisal
Project Level Ali Fahd
11.1.2. Project Management Team
<Identify who will be the members of the project management team as well as their role and main
contact.>
Name Role Contact
Ahmed Alsenosy Project Sponsor
Faisal Project Manager
Project Assurance
<Role>
<Role>
<Role>
Staffing Approach
11.2.1. Staff Required
<Present a detailed breakdown of the staff requirements by role needed to achieve the project objectives
and execute the project. Describe how staffing needs will be managed throughout the project.>
Communication Approach
12.1.1. Communication Items
<Describe the approach for identifying communication items and list these communication items per
stakeholder group:>
Stakeholder Communication Frequency Vehicle Owner
Group Required
Risk Management is carried out as a formal continuous process from project inception
thorough engineering, procurement, construction and operation phases. Project Risk
Management includes the Identification, Analysis, Evaluation, Prioritization, Mitigation and
Communication of all risks that can influence cost, schedule, quality, constructability, and
maintainability. MASAH scope is to develop a Risk Assessment Matrix for each awarded task
1. Risk Identification :
Risk Identification is the process of examining the various project areas and each critical Process to
identify and document any associated potential risks. During the life cycle of the
Project, the project team shall continuously strive to identify risks. This shall be accomplished through
periodic and event-driven Risk Identification Meetings. Risk identification for each Task will be performed
at regular stage and will be refined through out the construction phase.
Risk identification should address both internal and external risks as well as technical and
commercial risks. Internal risks are issues that the project team can control or influence.
External risks are things beyond the control or influence of the Project Team such as Land
permits.
The Risk Identification Meeting will be conducted as a structured brainstorming session and shall include
the project engineering leads, procurement, construction, and project management staff and if required,
representatives of the Client. The meeting will systematically work through all areas and phases of the
project to identify risks as well as opportunities.
At this stage of the process each candidate risk shall be accompanied by:
d- A qualitative assessment of the Consequence should the risk materialize (Very High,
High, Medium, Low or Very Low)
e- A qualitative assessment of the Manageability of the risk (Very High, High, Medium, Low, Very
Low)
While the Probability of Occurrence and the Consequence of the risk are a measure of the
Probable Consequence of the risk, the Manageability of the risk indicates how effectively the risk may be
mitigated. A risk with a Very High Probable Consequence and a Very High Manageability should receive
a high priority for mitigation activities. Refer to Figure 1.
Each identified risk shall be entered into the Risk Assessment Matrix (refer to attached sample) with as
much information as is available at the time.
Following the process of Risk Identification, risks should be analyzed and prioritized for follow-up and
management. The purpose of Risk Analysis is to understand the magnitude of the consequence should
a risk materialize in order to develop the strategies and tactics to mitigate the risk.
Risk Analysis is the process of examining each identified risk to refine the description of the risk, isolate
the cause, and determine the effects and consequences (or benefits) should the risk materialize.
Risk Analysis also involves the assessment of the quantitative probability of the risk materializing and the
quantitative consequence should it do so. The probable consequence of the risk is the probability
multiplied by the consequence. Once this evaluation is complete each risk shall be classified as a Risk
Level in accordance with the SLA Risk Management Standards as shown in Table 1.
3. Risk Mitigation:
Risk mitigation is the process that identifies, evaluates and selects appropriate mitigation strategies and
actions, in order to eliminate or lower the probable consequence of a threat to an acceptable level given
project constraints and objectives or, alternatively, maximize the benefits of an opportunity. This includes
the specifics on what should be done, by when it should be accomplished, the roles the various
stakeholders play in implementing it and any associated cost or schedule consequences.
Prior to selecting a risk mitigation strategy a cost/benefit analysis should be performed. This
Analysis should take into account the full lifecycle costs of any proposed mitigation as well as the degree
to which the strategy is expected to reduce the risk. Strategies that do not produce a high return should
be abandoned in favor of others that do.
It should be noted that any mitigation strategy will incur some cost and may affect schedule. Risk
Mitigation is not for free and its cost should be assessed.
Once a mitigation strategy has been selected for a particular risk, a description of the mitigation strategy,
the resulting corrective action plans and any associated costs, and the anticipated effectiveness of the
chosen strategy shall be entered in to the Risk Matrix. The expenditure of any identified costs associated
with the mitigation of a risk shall require the approval of the Project Management Team/Owner.
For each identified risk, one of the below risk mitigation strategies should be adopted:
· Risk Avoidance: by eliminating a risk from the project. It is often an expensive way of managing
risk.
· Risk Reduction: it involves implementing strategies and tactics that reduce either the probability
of occurrence, or the consequence, or sometimes both simultaneously.
· Task Duplication: it allows the project to proceed despite a delay or disruption in a task or process
· Risk Transfer: it involves ensuring that a risk resides within the project where it may be most
effectively managed.
· Risk Acceptance: it is an acknowldegment of the existence of a particular risk and a decision to
accept it without taking any further measures to mitigate it. Once a risk has been “accepted” the
full consequence must be included in the project execution plan.
The Project Manager/Owner will be responsible for managing and mitigating the risk
issues using a continuous structured approach.
4. Risk Communication
Page 1 of 40
Project Management Plan
FOR HOSPITAL
Support
Product On Time On Budget Documentat Transaction
Vendor post-
Quality Delivery Delivery ion Quality al Efficiency
delivery
1 – Unsatisfactory
2 – Acceptable
3 – Exceptional
Page 2 of 40
Project Management Plan
FOR HOSPITAL
19-
Enclosed Switches & 29-Oct- 31-Dec- 31-Dec-
1,368 Oct- CODE B 27-Dec-20 GE 140
Circuit Breaker 20
20 20 20