You are on page 1of 4

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/31333414

KIMIZ DALKIR Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice. Butterworth


Heinemann (2005). ISBN 0-7506-7864-x. {euro}44.95/$49.95/{pound}29.99.
368 pp. Hardbound.

Article  in  The Computer Journal · May 2006


DOI: 10.1093/comjnl/bxl012 · Source: OAI

CITATIONS READS

0 3,304

1 author:

Mark Burgin
University of California, Los Angeles
427 PUBLICATIONS   2,368 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Morphological Computing in Cognitive Systems View project

Cloud Agnostic Distributed Computing and Interoperable Clouds View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Mark Burgin on 01 June 2014.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


Book Reviews 501

full potential of MDA, which allows for models at multiple exploit Web information that is both heterogeneous and
layers of abstraction, and which has a meta-modelling and dynamic in nature. This book constitutes the proceedings of
model interchange framework enabling the use of multiple the 5th International Conference on Web Information Systems
modelling languages, is only hinted at. That said, the author Engineering, WISE 2004, held in Brisbane, Australia in
does provide a catalogue of patterns-based transformations November 2004. The purpose of this book is to identify the
that is very useful in the preparation of a Java implementation challenging problems facing the development of Web infor-
skeleton from a UML design. mation systems, and to shape future research directions and
However, some sections make one wonder whether the development activities in this area.
words ‘Advanced Systems Design’ in the title are justified. Overall, this book has a quite interesting collection of papers
There is a superficial introduction of methodology, while no which include original work in the area of Web information
discussion is given to separation of concerns or information systems engineering and which are quite intuitive in terms of
hiding, and only a cursory mention is made of three-tiered understanding and progressing research activities in this field.
architectures. The designs shown given range across GUI, OO In particular, this book contains 74 papers (45 full papers and 29
implementation and databases without the role of MDA in short papers) which are organized in 16 topical sections on Web
separating these viewpoints being discussed. An object- information system modelling; payment and security; infor-
relational mapping is described, but it avoids all the difficult mation extraction; advanced applications; performance issues;
issues related to the mapping of subtypes. linkage analysis and document clustering; Web caching and
Chapters seven and eight diverge from the stated subject content analysis; XML query processing; Web search and per-
matter of the book by introducing a grab-bag of web and sonalization; workflow management and enterprise information
mobile technology discussions. In particular, J2EE is given systems; business processes; deep Web and dynamic content;
shallow treatment, apparently due to lack of space consumed Web information systems design; ontologies and applications;
by discussions of .net, Bluetooth, and semantic web, among multimedia, user interfaces and languages; and peer-to-peer and
other topics, which adds little to the main thrust of the book. grid systems. Moreover, this book includes three interesting
In summary, the book is a very good introduction to the use of invited keynote papers which highlight the most challenging
UML within a limited MDA framework. It provides an emphasis and current issues in this area.
on completeness using constraints, which is vital to MDA, where The broad range of topics of this book makes it a useful
the more semantics a model contains, the more completely reference for both researchers and practitioners on Web
designs can be transformed into implementations. The rules information systems. Specifically, this book presents novel
highlighted in the text, the catalogue of transformations and solutions and approaches to Web systems engineering in the
the guidelines for modularization alone make this book valuable. dynamic, diverse, distributed and ever increasing volume of
The book’s digressions into non-core topics are a shame if only Web-based data and applications. Each paper presents enough
because the space could have been used to better expand on theory and concepts and it is accompanied by a wide range of
MDA, J2EE and other core areas. examples to show the applicability of the proposed techniques
or methodologies. Because each paper is self-contained, readers
can focus on the topics that most interest them.
KEITH DUDDY
To conclude this is an interesting computer science text
SoftMetaWare
book which is ideal for anyone interested in most popular
Australia
recent research and practicing outcomes in the area of Web
Email: keith.duddy@gmail.com
doi:10.1093/comjnl/bxl010 information technology.
Advance Access published on April 24, 2006
GEORGE PALLIS
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
XIAOFANG ZHOU, STANLEY SU, MIKE P. PAPAZOGLOU, Email: gpallis@ccf.auth.gr
MARIA E. ORLOWSKA AND KEITH G. JEFFERY doi:10.1093/comjnl/bxl011
Web Information Systems Engineering—WISE 2004. Advance Access published on April 24, 2006
Springer—Proceedings Series: Lecture Notes in Computer
Science, Vol. 3306 (2004). ISBN 3-540-23894-8. £34.55/
KIMIZ DALKIR
$117.00. 745 pp. Softbound.
Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice. Butterworth
Heinemann (2005). ISBN 0-7506-7864-x. d44.95/$49.95/
Web information utilization has become a critical emerging £29.99. 368 pp. Hardbound.
research area due to the exponential increase in the infor-
mation circulation and dissemination over the Web. Many Knowledge management (KM), as the author correctly writes
challenging problems must be solved in order to utilize and (p. 12), has been around for many decades. However, this

The Computer Journal Vol. 49 No. 4, 2006


502 Book Reviews

takes into account only explicit KM. Implicit KM has existed confusion. For instance (cf. p. 7), data are ‘content that is
for millennia. Even primitive tribes collected and preserved directly observable or verifiable’, while information is
knowledge useful for their survival. Religions as ancient ‘content that represents analyzed data’. As content does not
organizations were developing diverse practices of KM. States exist by itself, a reader comes to the following question: ‘It is
managed knowledge for better functioning. One of the oldest content of what?’ Much later (in Chapter 3, p. 48), the author
examples of such KM is the Codex Hammurabi, in which introduces definitions of data, information and knowledge
Hammurabi, ruler of a great empire in the Ancient Middle from the book [3]. In particular, information is defined as a
East in the Old Babylonian time (1850 BC), codified 282 message, usually in the form of a document or an audible
laws on an 8 foot high stele made of black basalt. This Codex or visible communication. This definition is rooted in the
demonstrates how tacit knowledge on jurisdiction in ancient Shannon’s information theory and confuses information
Babylon was made explicit. with its carriers. In reality, information is contained not
Knowledge always has been important, but now its only in messages. For example, databases do not, as a rule,
importance has immensely increased. Life and death of orga- consist of messages but always contain information. Besides,
nizations depend on their knowledge and how they manage the definition from Chapter 3 contradicts to the definition
it. ‘Knowledge,—as the author writes (p. 16), has become given in the Glossary of this book. There it is defined that
increasingly more valuable than the more traditional physical information is ‘analyzed data—facts that have been organized
or tangible assets.’ The reason is, as Nonaka and Takeuchi in order to impart meaning’. Thus, information becomes a kind
write [1], that in ‘an economy where only certainty is of data, while knowledge is defined as subjective and valuable
uncertainty, the one sure source of lasting competitive information with additional properties. As result, following
advantage is knowledge’. As a result, the notion of KM these definitions, we come to a strange situation when
entered popular usage in the late 1980s, books on KM there is no objective knowledge in contrast to the main
began to appear by the early 1990s, and the field picked up assumption of epistemology that scientific knowledge is
momentum in the mid-1990s with the development of a objective.
number of large, international conferences and workshops. Absence of relevant definitions results in other deficiencies.
This started a process of KM transformation from a cluster For example, it is written (p. 28): ‘The information unit is
of practical knowledge and skills to a true scientific discipline. singled out as the formally codified atom of information to
The book of Kimiz Dalkir is a considerable step in this be stored.’ As we do not know what is atom of information,
direction. The book is interesting, has many merits and a we cannot understand what information unit is. The problem
quantity of useful material. The author considers diverse with this statement that resembles a definition is that one
aspects of KM: KM and its history (Chapter 1); models of unknown notion ‘an information unit’ is defined through
the KM cycle (Chapter 2); models of separate KM processes, another unknown notion ‘an information atom’. In logic,
such as knowledge conversion or creation (Chapter 3); this is called the fallacy of the vicious circle in definition.
cognitive issues of KM, such as capture of tacit knowledge The definitions of knowledge given in the book are also far
and codification of explicit knowledge (Chapter 4); social from being adequate and consistent.
issues of KM, such as knowledge sharing communities The book well reflects other misconceptions and contradic-
(Chapter 5) and KM teams (Chapter 10); practical issues tions that exist in those areas that form foundations for KM.
of KM, such as knowledge application (Chapter 6); the role However, it is always beneficial for the reader when the author
of organizational culture in KM (Chapter 7); KM tools critically selects and thoroughly organizes ideas, concepts and
(Chapter 8); and KM strategies and metrics (Chapter 9). A models taken from other sources. Without rational analysis
useful feature of the book is its Glossary. In conclusion and, at least, reasonable synthesis, all this diverse material can
(Chapter 11), the author formulates future challenges for KM. become very confusing. For instance, in Chapter 1, the author
One of the challenges is to build theoretical foundations gives (p. 5) the definition from [4] of knowledge as ‘. . . the
for KM. They have to be rooted in cognitology, psychology, insights, understandings, and practical know-how . . .’ Then in
sociology, as well as based on the theory of data and know- Chapter 3, the author uses (p. 48) given by Davenport and
ledge, system theory and information theory. Absence of Prusak [3] definition of knowledge as ‘a fluid mixture of
sound theoretical foundations is demonstrated by confusion framed experiences, values, contextual information and
inherent to many books and papers (cf., for example, [2]) and expert insight. . .’ On the next page, he writes that Nonaka
related to the distinction between data, knowledge and and Takeuchi [1] define knowledge as ‘justified true belief’.
information. It is interesting that at first, in his discussion So, the reader becomes very confused with the question ‘What
of how to distinguish data from information and is knowledge—a process or a mixture’ If the reader goes to the
information from knowledge, the author does not give Glossary, she/he finds one more definition of knowledge as
definitions of these concepts but describes some examples. subjective and valuable information. Trying to resolve these
Some of these examples actually add to the general inconsistencies, the reader goes to the term information, which

The Computer Journal Vol. 49 No. 4, 2006


Book Reviews 503

is defined as ‘analyzed data—facts . . .’ and comes to even accessible by R directly. Explicit knowledge of a system R
deeper confusion, wondering whether insights (p. 5) are exists in a form accessible/open to other systems. Implicitly
data or facts. explicit knowledge of a system R exists in a form directly
There are also problems with definitions of KM because accessible/open only to R. For instance, implicitly explicit
it is often confused with the whole body of organizational knowledge of company’s employees is not open to this
practices. We can see this in the definition of KM as company.
‘the deliberate and systematic coordination of an organiza- To conclude, it is necessary to state that the book is well
tion’s people, technology, processes, and organizational composed and undoubtedly written with deep knowledge of
structure . . .’ (p. 337) or in treating benchmarking as a KM the subject. It does not only contain a lot of valuable material
metric (pp. 272–275). in the field of KM, but also provides a base for the further
To be just, it is necessary to say that this is not the fault development of this field.
of the author. He took only those materials that are given
in the most popular textbooks, monographs and papers.
REFERENCES
However, utilization of the general theory of information
and quantum theory of knowledge systems (cf., for example, [1] Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995) The Knowledge-Creating
[5]) makes it is possible to remedy shortcomings caused Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of
by the traditional approach to definition of knowledge and Innovation. Oxford University Press, New York.
information, as well as to determine consistent and at the [2] Burgin, M. (2003) Information: Problems, Paradoxes, and
same time, efficient distinctions between data, knowledge Solutions, TripleC, v. 1. No. 1, pp. 53–70.
and information. [3] Davenport, T. and Prusak, L. (1998) Working Knowledge.
As KM is only on its way to becoming a true scientific Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
discipline, many concepts, ideas and models in the book [4] Wiig, K. (1993) Knowledge Management Foundations. Schema
Press, Arlington, TX.
demand further development. For example, one of the basic
[5] Burgin, M. (2004) Data, Information, and Knowledge,
issues in KM is distinction traditionally made between tacit
Information, v. 7, No. 1, pp. 47–57.
and explicit knowledge, which was extensively studied by
[6] Polanyi, M. (1966) The Tacit Dimension, Peter Smith,
Polanyi [6]. A more detailed and fine classification based Gloucester, MA.
on the systemic approach adds one more category to these
two, namely, implicitly explicit knowledge. The systemic
approach implies that it is always necessary to relate MARK BURGIN
knowledge to some system as knowledge carrier/container. University of California, USA
This allows us to give a working definition for all three Email: mburgin@math.ucla.edu
types of knowledge. Tacit knowledge of a system R is doi:10.1093/comjnl/bxl012
unarticulated knowledge that can be used by R but is not Advance Access published on April 27, 2006

The Computer Journal Vol. 49 No. 4, 2006

View publication stats

You might also like