Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
The University of Chicago Press and Renaissance Society of America are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize,
preserve and extend access to Renaissance Quarterly.
http://www.jstor.org
Theinvention ofGiorgione's
much-interpretedpaintingknownas The Tempestcan be explained
withreference to theDe rerumnaturaofLucretius.Lucretiusprovidestheessentialconnection
betweenthemain elements ofthepainting.a male lwanderer,'a
lightningbolt,brokencolumns,a
naked,nursingfemale, and a landscaperenderedaccordingto momentary, fleetingappearances.
The inventionofthepaintingalso respondsto thewayLucretiuswas readaround 1500, to the
ofthepoet'sRenaissancereadersand imitators,
specificinterests and toformsofse'-cultivation
associatedwiththeownership ofa studiolo.
Very
rightly, Lucretius,
[wrote]
therefore, himwhofirst
whenhepraised
discovered
wisdom,butthisineptly,
becausehethoughtitwasdiscovered
by
manjustasthoughthatmanwhomhepraisedhadfoundherlyingsomewhere
'legstoward
thesource'as
thepoets
say.'
- Lactantius
1. A PROBLEM OF GENRE
uchrecentwritingGiorgione'sTempest (Fig 1.) conveystheimpression
of wishing to staunch the prolificflow of interpretations.Little
conveysthe sense of anythinggained frompreviouscommentarieson the
painting,or fromthe richcontextualexplorationsofVenetianculturesuch
researchhas often involved. Many suggestiveinsights,resultingfrom
investigationof the painting'svisual sources, its possible referencesto
contemporary circumstances,itscuriouslyarchetypal havebecome
character,
buried, withheld from later investigation by an impulse to closure
characteristic
of iconographicalstudies.An ironicsenseof despondencyhas
hauntedmanydiscussionsof thispaintingof gatheringdarkness,together
with gloomymetacriticalreflectionson the interpretative project of art
and
historyitself, discussionsof the Tempesthave for some epitomizedthe
in
discipline itsmost benightedstate.'The presentessay,whichaddressesthe
*1 would like to thank jaynie Anderson, Shane Butler,and Ann Kuttnerfortheir
invaluablehelp withthisproject.
'Lactantius,3.14,197. Original textin Lactantius,cols. 0386c-0387a: Rectiusitaque
Lucretius,cum eum laudat,qui sapientiamprimusinvenit:sed hoc inepte,quod ab homine
inventamputavit.Quasi vero illam alicubi jacentem homo ille, quem laudabat, invenerit,
tanquam tibias ad fontem,ut poetae aiunt. All subsequent translationsare mine unless
otherwisespecified.
'For the Tempestliteratureas case study of art history'sunease with its own "harsh
hermeneutics" which "setaside whateveris partial,veiled,superseded,and even incorrectin
favorof the singleanswer,"see Elkins,227-48.
tend.In thissense,thestrongest
interpretations workon thepainting has
soughtto alignitbothwith the of
practices art around
collecting 1500,and
withVenetianliteraryculture.3Some have proposedits classificationas a
poesia,thatis,as a paintedequivalentfora poem,or a workwhichproduces
cc
poetic"effectsthroughpainterly means.' Less certain,however,is theexact
basis accordingto whichthe Tempest can be designateda "paintedpoem."
Poesiais presumedto be a genrein itselfIn thissense,thestrongest workon
thepaintinghas soughtto alignit bothwiththeratherthanas manifesting
anyrelationto thegenresofliterary composition,or to thecontestedsignif-
5
icance of poetryduringtheyearsof Giorgione'sactivity. In whatfollows,
Giorgione'spainting will be identifiedwith a humanist theoryand practice
ofpoesia around 1500, but a conception which would also havebeen mean-
ingful forthefirst owner of the picture,the Venetian patricianand collector
GabrieleVendramin(1484-1552).
Preciselyat the timewhen Giorgionewas painting,two centuriesof
debateregarding thestatusofthepoeticartwereculminating in increasingly
elaborateattemptsto establishthemorality, benefit,
civilizing and claimto
truthof poetry,whichcenteredon the readingand imitationof one of the
mostcontroversial and sensationalof all ancientpoetictexts:theDe rerum
naturaof Lucretius.'The humanistresponseto Lucretius,theconceptionof
the functionof poetryand the fieldof poetic practiceenabled by the De
rerumnatura,hereprovidestheprincipaldimensionfortheunderstanding
ofGiorgione'spainting.Lucretius,alongwithVirgil,was by 1500 becoming
centralto a humanistconceptof readingpoetryas a moralformation of the
self,centeredon privatereflectionand contemplativedetachment.In
Venice,such an ethicaland pedagogicalnotionof readinghad emergedas a
responseto a long-standingdisdain forpoetryon the part of the city's
One of thecharacteristic
intelligentsia. productsof Venetianhumanismin
25
AdamandEveisthesubjectidentified bySettis; andDanaebyParronchi,
Jupiter inLa
Nazione,14 September 1976 (citedin Settis,68) whilethesubjectofMarsandVenuswas
revived witha hermeticcastin Cioci.Fora recent reading
astrological seeCarroll.
26
interms
Forinterpretations ofnaturalphilosophy, 1966,and 1975,
seeTschmelitsch,
240-65.Foran inventive recentreprisalofthephilosophical adageon discordiaconcors,see
Sheard.
21
Sheard,154-57.
28
SeeHoward,andKaplan.Fortheastrological reformulation seeCarroll.
ofthisposition
Fora criticismofthepositionwhichacceptsMichiel'sidentification ofthemalefigure as a
soldier,seeHale,416: "Whoever compiled theinventory ofGabrieleVendramin's'Camerino
delle antigaglie'in 1569 describedtheyoungman moreunderstandably, ifstillnot
as a ...
convincingly, shepherd explanations thatturn on the or
figure, the moralorallegorical
ofa soldieraremistaken."
associations,
29
in 1499 (Fig. 2) , as well as Jacopo Sannazaro' s Arcadia, a pastoral work in
prose and verse which appeared in Naples in 1504, but which was widely read
throughout Ital Y.30 We are confronted by poetic signs and motifs which call
for interpretation; but such interpretation can proceed in any number of
ways (like any of those just described) unless we can determine what poetic
kindwe are dealing with here, a framing principle of poetic genre which could
set reasonable limits to interpretation.
The Tempest has sometimes been classed as a poesia, on the basis of a
passage in a 1548 treatise on painting by Paolo Pino which called for painters
to observe a kind of metonymic brevity and improvisatory technique
analogous to the poets "in their comedies and other compositions."31 yet
Pino also characterized painting as poetry in terms which would have been
quite acceptable to Leon Battista Alberti, or Mantegna, or Raphael, or to a
tradition of artists and writers who understood the analogy of painting and
poetry according to a principle of invention deriving from ancient rhetoric:
"la pittura "epropriapoesia, cio'e invenzione."32 However, those who identify
Giorgione's painting with his poesia have often asserted the self-sufficiency of
his imagery, as if it were poetic only according to a rather narrow sense of
33
poetic invention grounded in the vernacular lyric. A related claim is that the
- -
Tempest participates in even inaugurates a kind of pure genre painting,
and that it could be classed with a series of depictions of family-like groups
in landscapes from around 1510-15, such as the Landscape with Halbardier,
Woman and Two Children from the Palma Vecchio circle (Fig. 3) and the
Nursing Mother with Halbardier in a Landscape attributed to Titian (Fig. 4).
However, while these other Venetian works correspond in some formal
respects to Giorgione's picture, there is no consequent basis for the assertion
that they reproduce its subject and its meaning. The Tempest manifests a
singularity, even a deep strangeness, which cannot be explained away or
reduced to generic terms.
.........
XX
vv
. ...............
. ..... .. ..
777
.........
..
VO
FIGURE 3. Follower of Palma Vecchio, Landscape with Halbardier, Woman and Two
Children. Philadelphia Museum of Art, purchased with the W P. Wilstach Fund.
pointed out, the inclusion in these other images of a figure with the clearly
designated attributes of a soldier is a fair indication that the male figure in
Giorgione's picture is not a soldier.35 Nor is there any probability that he is a
shepherd; the figure resembles a patrician youth of Giorgione's own time, and
we might surmise that costume here serves primarily to mark him as a city-
dweller who has now wandered away from the city.31)X%ile the Cambridge
and Philadelphia paintings appear to configure the man, woman, and child
as a family group, this is, however, no necessary basis for seeing the Tempest
as representation of a family. While the confrontation of a young clothed
male and a female in a "state of nature" might indeed imply a recent or
imminent sexual interaction, at the same time the figures appear not only
spatially but psychologically isolated; it is by no means apparent that they are
aware of each other.
"Hale, 518.
36
On the costume, identified as that of a member of a compagnia della calza, see
Anderson,165-68. On the costumeof the compagniesee Venturi1908a, especially208-13.
40
Morelli,51-52.; translationin MerchantWriters,70-71; also citedin Liebenwein,72.
41
On the philosophicalimportof poeticlanguagein Landino and Pontano,see Grassi,
37-41, 57-61. For Polizianoon Homer see his Nutriciain Poliziano, 147,11.476 ff.On the
intellectually-embattledcontextof the Nutriciaand Poliziano'sview of poetrysee Godman,
70-79. In his ActiusPontano discussesthe poet'sabilityto chargenaturewiththe qualityof
inspiringwonder,which naturein itselfdoes not possess: "ut, cum poetica sicut historia
constetrebusac verbis,his utrisquepoeta ad admirationemconciliandamnon utaturmodo,
verumetiaminnitatur.Quamobrem,quod veritaspraestarehoc sola minusposset,veritatem
nunc inumbrantfictisfabulosisque commentis,nunc ea comminiscunturquae omnino
abhorreanta vero atque a rerumnatura."Pontano, 1943, 234-35. See also the discussionof
Poliziano and Pontano with referencealso to JosephScaliger'sPoetics in Galand-Hallyn,
189-223.
42
Raimondi,656-57.
genus/Spirituum vicesmultiplicesque
astra,/astrorumque
sobolescaeliquedecemplicis viae/
Suntanimaedivumnitidoquosaethere virtus/donatethossanctosindigetesque vocant/et
quaemateriam praebent elementacaducis/Rebus& aeternaedantalimenta neci.... Suntea
quae profertaer,quae parturitaequor/Quae generat pinguidaedalaterrasinu/Multicolor
facies
agrisilvaequecomantes /Multisonaevolucres
multivagaequeferae/Suntsophiaepartes
estingeniosamathesis /verbaqueclamosilitigiosafori/Sunthominumvitae;suntdigna
negociaversu/plurima gestaforis,
plurimagestadomi.Baptista
Mantuanus, 117-20,131-38.
On thepoemseeGaisser, 230,whosituates Mantuanus' demandwithincontroversies on the
oflicentious
imitation ancientpoetssuchas Catullus.
CompareLucretius 1-7:"tibisuavisdaedalatellus."
41
48
See Goddard,1991,251,andReeve.
49ThePastoralConcertintheLouvrefeatures a program whichisentirely
consistentwith
thatofthemorecriticallyself-conscious poetsofthetime.The painting employsthetopos of
theSourceor fountainhead ofpoetry, thewellspring ofancientpoeticwisdomtendedby
nymphswho personify Poesiaand Persuasion.Returning to thewellspring of ancient
eloquence,themodernpoet- theluteplayerin contemporary costume- engagesin a
harmonious dialoguewiththeArcadian shepherd poet,a confrontation
whichepitomizes the
vitalconfluenceofancienttradition withmodernpractice. See Egan,andKlein.
"On thecirculation ofLucretius in ItalyseeReeve,27-48.On thehumanist reception
ofLucretius andtheinterestinEpicureanism, seeGarin,1959;Pagnoni, andKraye,374-86.
See alsoHadzsits,269, foran accountoftheeditionsofLucretius aftertheeditioprinceps
of 1473.
ex professoLucretiusexcelluit.
in thecosmos,butin an endlessly
mobileand tumultuous
mixturewhose
incidental is and
product meteorological geologicalphenomena the
and
oflivingthings,
existence modeofrendering
Giorgione's wouldhavea special
resonancefora beholderfamiliarwithEpicureancosmology.63
Standingapartto theleft,theman,like theviewer,calmlysurveysthe
entirespectaclein its totality:the gatheringclouds, the bolt of lightning
which rendersthe citywalls below incandescent,perhapsalso the mother
and child.Bothhe and she see thestormforwhatit is,not as a portentor as
theragingofa deity,butas theindifferent motionoftheelements.The bro-
ken columns behind the male figurehave been read by Edgar Wind as a
symbolof fortitude.64 yetgiventhatthesecolumnsarepartof a complexof
architecturalfragments, theycan be seen morepointedlyin termsof Lu-
cretius'argumentagainsttheplausibility of stormytheophanies.Lightning,
Lucretiuswrites,frequently strikesat thetemplesofgod; arewe supposedto
believe thatgod would strikeat his own dwelling?Or does the factthat
lightningstrikesall man-madestructures withoutdiscriminationnot rather
the
prove absurdity of divineintervention?6'The fallof also
buildings proves
theinstabilityof all thingsin nature,thepredisposition of matterto always
assumenew forms:66 "Again,do you not see thatevenstonesare conquered
by time,thattall turretsfalland rockscrumble,thatthegods' templesand
theirimageswear out and crack,nor can theirholydivinitycarryforward
the boundariesof fateor striveagainstnature'slaws?Again,do we not see
the monumentsof men fall to pieces?" (5:306-10)
The Epicurean philosopher in Lucretius' poem is characterized
throughoutas a wayfarer;this includes both Epicurus and the poet, his
disciple.Lucretiusintroducesthe themeof thewandererin his firstbook
(1:62-79), wherehe presentsan apotheosisof Epicurus:
61
Ibid., 4:54-90; 722-77.
64
Wind, 26-27, uniquely invoked the name of Lucretiuswith regardto Giorgione's
painting,onlyto quicklydisposeofit.He rejectedat theoutsetthepossibility
thatthepainting
was relatedto "a Lucretianconceptof dynamicmyth,"assumingthatthisis what Ferriguto's
Aristotelianreadingwas headingtoward.Yet laterin his texthe appearsdrawnmomentarily
to theLucretianconnection,whichhe briefly imaginesshornof itsscholasticcomponent:"If
thiswerethemoralof the Tempesta (i.e. Ferriguto's
tempestaserena,in whichtherawforcesof
natureare masteredby man), it would hardlybe necessaryin this instanceto invoke the
Aristotelianismof Ermolao Barbaro,since any Platonistor Stoic, or even any followerof
Lucretius, might have said the same." Wind thus saw the painting as a moral allegory,
regardingthisas moreconsonantwiththe "unencumberedstyle"of thepicture.
65
Lucretius, 1982: "Postremo cur sancta deum delubra suasque / discutit infesto
praeclaresfulminesedes,/ et bene factadeum frangitsimulacrasuisque / demitimaginibus
violentovoinerehonorem?"
66A point made by Ferriguto,II 8-19.
Whenman'slifelayforalltoseegroveling crushed
foully, beneaththeweight of
Superstition which
(religione) displayedher head from the of
regions heaven,
loweringovermortals withhorribleaspect,a manofGreecewasfirst thatdared
toupliftmortal eyesagainst the
her, first
to make standagainsther;forneither
fablesofthegodscouldquellhim,northelightning flash(fulmina),
norheaven
withmenacing roar.Butallthemoretheygoadedtheeagercourageofhissoul,
so thatheshoulddesire, ofallmen,toshatter
first theconfining barsofnature's
gates.Therefore thelivelypowerofhismindprevailed, andforth he marched
farbeyondtheflaming wallsoftheworld,as he traversed theimmeasurable
universein thought andimagination; whencevictorious heretums bearinghis
prize,theknowledge ofwhatcancomeintobeing, whatcannot,ina word,how
eachthinghasitspowerslimitedand itsdeep-setboundary mark.Therefore
Superstitionisnowinherturncastdownandtrampled underfoot,whilstweby
thevictoryareexaltedhighas heaven.(7)
The wandererfigure,whose clothingbears the signs of urban
sophistication,hasembarked on a literal"marching beyondthewalls"(the
incandescent walls
lightning-illuminated may even manifest an allusionto
theflammantia moeniamundibywhichLucretius designates theterrestrial
realm). He could perhaps be identified with the pioneeringGreek
philosopher,whosecontemplation ofnaturalphenomena andthecondition
ofmanispresented byLucretius asa heroicquest;or,moreprobably, hecould
be a contemporary "Epicurean" who has left
the to
city pursue truth at the
point where civilization
givesplace to nature.
Clearly,he does not wear the
dressof a philosopher(althoughthe youngestof the Vienna Three
whowearsa whiteshirt
Philosophers, withgoldembroideries, isalsounusual
inthisrespect). his
Yet identity be
couldperhaps conveyed through evoking
a long-standingstereotypeofthe"Epicurean." Giorgione hasgivenhimthe
parti-colored hose of an aristocratic Venetianyouth,who withmany
members ofhisclassparticipated in one oftwenty-three festivecompanies
knownas thecompagnie dellacalza: fraternities of thestocking.These
brotherhoods wereprominent andfamiliar inVenetian lifebythe1500s,and
hadalsorecently includedtheyoungprinces Francesco GonzagaofMantua
and Alfonsod'Este of Ferrara among theirmembers. 67
The compagnie,
devotedto littlebeyondthepleasureof theirmembers, had a distinctly
libertinecast;theSenatewouldoccasionallyintervene to curtailtheir
banquets"sosumptuous as to causescandalto God andtheworld,"which
weresometimesfrequented by courtesans.The diaristMarinSanudo
reported thatin 1508 theircustomary theatrical
performances werebanned;
a laterrenewaloftheprohibition describedsuchperformances as "incentives
68
Venturi,1908a, 219, citesthe 1460 Senatorialcondemnationof "cenaset pastus,adeo
sumptuosos,quod estquaedam abhominatiodeo et mondo." For Sanudo on theprohibition
of comedies "incentivodi lasciviaet detestabilecorrutteladelli boni costumi"see Venturi,
1908a, 220. Sanudo wrotein 1530 about the Council of Ten's renewalof ordinancesfirst
proclaimedin 1508.
69Garin,1959, 222.
70
Pontano, 1948, 71: Nam mihi iam pridem tenuesagitanturamores,/ Attritamque
sequor vatibus ipse viam / Intactos ausus necdum contingerefontes/ Arduus et summa
carperemontisiter/Hic, ubi PieriorecubansLucretiusantro/Concinuitlatiocarminadigna
sono /Ac rarumsiculusfoecundopectorevates/ Rerumnaturaecondiditauctoropus.
man )s violent force and vehement lust" (5:963-65). For Lucretius, Venus is
Bibliograp
Allen, Michael J. 1998. Synoptic Art.Mar- Conte, Gian Biagio. 1994. Genres and
silio Ficino on theHistoryofPlatonic Readers:Lucretius,Love Elegy,Pliny's
Interpretation.Florence. Encyclopedia. Trans. G. W. Most.
Anderson, Jaynie. 1997. Giorgione: The Baltimoreand London.
Painter of 'PoeticBrevity.'New York Dempsey, Charles. 1992. The Portrayalof
and Paris. Love. Botticelli's 'Primavera'and
Humanist Culture at the Time of
Bacchelli,Franco. 1998. "Science,Cosmol-
LorenzotheMagnificent. Princeton.
ogy and Religion in Ferrara,
Dosso'sFate: Paintingand Court Culturein
1520-1550," in Dosso'sFate,333-59.
Renaissance Italy. 1998. Ed. Luisa
Battilotti,Donata and Maria TeresaFranco.
Ciammitti, Steven Ostrow, and
1978. "Regesti di committentie dei
SalvatoreSettis.Los Angeles.
primicoliezionistidi Giorgione."An- Dionisotti, Carlo. 1995. Aldo Manuzio.
tichit'a'
viva,4-5, 53-87. Umanistae Editore.Milan.
Brown,Alison. 1997. "De-civilizingtheRe-
Egan, Patricia. 1959. "Poesia and the Fe^te
naissance." Renaissance Studies
champe^tre." The Art Bulletin
15:4-12. 41:303-13.
Brown,Cliffordand Sally Hickson. 1997. Elkins, James. 1993. "On Monstrously
"Caradosso Foppa (ca. 1452-1526/
Ambiguous Paintings." Historyand
27)." ArteLombardaII 9/1:9-39. Theory32:227-48.
Brown,Patricia.1996. VeniceandAntiquity: Emison, Patricia.1997. Low and High Style
The Venetian SenseofthePast.New Ha- in Italian RenaissanceArt.New York.
ven and London. Farago, Claire. 1992. Leonardo da Vinci's
Campbell, Stephen. 1997. Cosme'Tura of Paragone:A CriticalInterpretationwith
Ferrara.Style,Politicsand theRenais- a new editionofthe textin the Codex
sance City 1450-1495. New Haven Urbinas.New Yorkand Leiden.
and London. Ferriguto,A. 1933. Attraverso i "Misteri"di
'2000. "Mantegna's Parnassus. Giorgione.CastelfrancoVeneto.
Findlen, Paula. 1994. PossessingNature:
Reading,Collectingand the Studiolo."
Re-ValuingRenaissance Art.Ed. Gabri- Museums, Collecting,and Scientific
ele Neher and Rupert Shepherd, Culturein EarlyModernItaly.Berkeley,
London and Los Angeles.
69-87. Brookfield,VT.
Fowler,Alistair.1982. KindsofLiterature.
an
Carroll,Linda. 1992. "Giorgione'sTempest.-
Introductio n totheTheoryofGenresand
Astrology is in the Eyes of the Be- Modes.Cambridge.
holder," in Reconsidering the
Gaisser,JuliaHaig. 1993. Catullusand his
Renaissance. Ed. M. A. di Cesare,
RenaissanceReaders.Oxford.
125-40. Binghamton,NY.
Galand-Hallyn, Perrine.1995. Lesyeuxde
Chambers, David and Brian Pullan, eds.
Nloquence. Poetiques humanistesde
1992. Venice:A DocumentaryHistory, 1'e'vidence.Orle'ans.
1450-1630. Oxford. Garin, Eugenio, ed. 1958. Ilpensiero
Cioci, Francesco. 1991. La Tempestainter- pedagogicodelloumanesimo.Florence.
pretatadiecianni dopo.Florence. . 1959. "Ricerchesull'epicureismo
Colie, Rosalie. 1973. TheResources ofKind: del Quattrocento," in Epicurea in
Genre Theoryin theRenaissance.Ed. memoriamHectorisBignone,217-37.
BarbaraK. Lewalski.Berkeley. Genoa.
Manuzio, Paolo. 1560. Lettere volgari. Prete,Sesto. 1978. Studiesin Latin Poetsof
Venice. theQuattrocento. Lawrence,KS.
Massa, E. 1992. L'eremo,la Bibbia e il medi- Raimondi,Ezio. 1974. "II primocommento
oevo in umanisti veneti delprimo umanisticoa Lucrezio,"in Tralatinoe
Per CarloDionisotti.2:641-74.
volgare.-
Cinquecento.Naples.
Padua.
MerchantWriters oftheItalian Renaissance.
FromBoccaccioto Machiavelli. 1999. Rav'a, A. 1920. "II 'camerino delle Anti-
Ed. Vittore Branca, trans. Murtha gaglie'di GabrieleVendramin."Nuovo
ArchivioVeneton.s. 39:155-81.
Baca. New York.
Reeve, Michael. 1980. "The Italian Tradi-
Morelli, Giovanni Pagolo. 1956. Ricordi. tion of Lucretius."Italia medioevalee
Ed. V. Branca. Florence. umanistica23: 7-48.
Muraro,Michelangelo,ed. 1987. La letter- RenaissanceVeniceand theNorth.Crosscur-
atura,la rappresentazione, la musicaal rentsin the TimeofBellini,DAirerand
tempoe nei luoghidi Giorgione.Rome. Titian. 1999. Ed. BeverlyL. Brown
Nova, Alessandro. 1998. "Giorgione's In- and BernardAikema.New York.
ferno with Aeneas and Anchises for Robey,David. 1984. "HumanistViews on
Taddeo Contarini." In Dosso's Fate, the Study of Poetryin the Early Re-
"
41-62. naissance. History of Education
13:7-25
Pagnoni,Maria R. 1974. "Primenote sulla
tradizionemedievale e umanistica di Rosand, David. 1992. "PastoralTopoi: On
theConstructionofMeaning in Land-
Epicuro." Annali della scuola normale
di Pisa, Classedi lettere scape," in The PastoralLandscape,ed.
superiore efiloso-
JohnDixon Hunt, 161-77. Washing-
fia ser.3, 4:1443-77. ton, DC.
Pino, Paolo. 1960. Dialogo di Pittura in
Scala, Bartolomeo. 1997. Humanisticand
Trattatid'arte del Cinquecento,ed. P. Political Writings.Ed. Alison Brown.
Barocchi,3 vols. 1:95-139. Bari. Tempe,AZ.
Pio, GiovanniBattista.151 1. In CarumLu- Schmitter,Monika. 1997. "The Display of
cretium poetam Commentariia Ioanne Distinction:ArtCollectingand Social
BaptistaPio editi:codiceLucretianodil- Statusin EarlySixteenthCenturyVen-
igenteremendato: nodis omnibus et ice." Ph. D. Thesis,The Universityof
difficultatibus apertis:obiterex diversis Michigan.Ann Arbor.
auctoribustumgrecistumlatinismulta Serlio, Sebastiano. 1540. Regolegeneralidi
architettura.Venice.
legesenucleata:que superioretasaut ta-
cuitaut ignoravit. Settis,Salvatore.1990. Giorgione's Tempest.
Bologna.
Poliziano, Agnolo. 1996. Silvae. Ed. Interpreting the Hidden Subject.
FrancescoBausi. Florence. Chicago.
Sheard,Wendy S. 1983. "Giorgione'sTem-
Pontano, Gian Gioviano. 1513. Pontani
pesta: External vs. Internal Texts."
Opera. Urania, sive de stellis libri Italian Culture4:145-58.
quinque.Venice. Stefanini,Luigi. 1955. 11motivodella 'Tem-
. 1943. I Dialoghi. Ed. Carmelo
pesta'di Giorgione.Padua.
Previtera.Florence.
Syson, Luke, and Dora Thornton. 2001.
' 1948. Ioannis Ioviani Pontani Objectsof Virtue.Artin RenaissanceIt-
Carmina.Ed. J. Oeschger.Bari. aly.London.