Xid-4231132 1

UNCLASSIFIED
Theater Security
Cooperation Resources
Handbook
mand
. European Com
in the U.S
ration Resources
Coope
Theater Security
on
A Primer
Prepared by:
HQ US European Command Office
of Strategy Implementation, ECJ5-S
21 Oct 2016
DSN 314-430-7554
Commercial +49 (0)711-680-7554
joe.j.puckett.civ@mail.mil
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
This page intentionally left blank
II
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Table of Contents
PART 1 ........................................................................................................................................................................1
AN INTRODUCTION TO THEATER SECURITY COOPERATION RESOURCES ............................................... 1
Overview ......................................................................................................................................... 1
Purpose of this Handbook............................................................................................................... 2
References ...................................................................................................................................... 2
Key Terms and Definitions .............................................................................................................. 2
Programming for TSC Resources................................................................................................... 3
TSC Activity Management .............................................................................................................. 3
USEUCOM Resource Allocation Guidance.................................................................................... 4
PART 2 ........................................................................................................................................................................5
RESOURCE DETAILS ............................................................................................................................. 5
ACSA – Acquisition and Cross-Servicing Agreements ............................................................... 6
BPC – Building Partnership Capacity .......................................................................................... 9
CCIF – CCDR Initiative Fund .................................................................................................... 12
CDI – Combating Weapons of Mass Destruction (CWMD) Cooperative Defense Initiative ..... 15
CE – Civic Engagement ............................................................................................................ 17
CN – Counter-Narcotics Support............................................................................................... 20
CRSP – Coalition Readiness Support Program........................................................................ 23
CSF – Coalition Support Fund .................................................................................................. 28
CTFP – Combating Terrorism Fellowship Program .................................................................. 31
DCCEP – Developing Countries Combined Exercise Program................................................ 35
DEIC – Defense Environmental International Cooperation....................................................... 40
DHAPP – DoD HIV/AIDS Prevention Program ......................................................................... 43
EITP – Expeditionary Intelligence Training Program................................................................. 45
ERC – Exercise Related Construction ...................................................................................... 47
ERF – European Rotational Force Program ............................................................................. 50
ERI – European Reassurance Initiative .................................................................................... 54
ESAF – European Security Assistance Fund............................................................................ 56
FMF – Foreign Military Financing – Grants ............................................................................... 59
GCMC – George C. Marshall European Center ....................................................................... 62
GL&S – Global Lift and Sustain................................................................................................. 63
GPOI – Global Peace Operations Initiative ............................................................................... 66
GSCF – Global Security Contingency Fund.............................................................................. 68
HMA –Humanitarian Mine Action .............................................................................................. 73
IMET – International Military Education and Training................................................................ 75
JCET – Joint Combined Exchange Training ............................................................................. 77
JETP – Joint Exercise Transportation Program ........................................................................ 82
MPA – Military Personnel Authorization .................................................................................... 85
III
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
PDP – Partnership Development Program ............................................................................... 87

Section 1203 – General Purpose Training ................................................................................ 90
Section 1207 – Loan of Personnel Protection and Personnel Survivability Equipment ............ 94
Section 1250 – Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative (USAI)................................................... 96
Section 1251 – Eastern European Training Initiative (EETI)..................................................... 98
Section 2282 – Authority to Build the Capacity of Foreign Security Forces............................ 101
TCA – Traditional CCMD Activities.......................................................................................... 105
USACC CULP – USA Cadet Command Cultural Understanding and Language Proficiency
Program ................................................................................................................................... 108
WIF – Wales Initiative Fund..................................................................................................... 111
DOS – Assistance for European, Eurasia, and Central Asia (AEECA) .................................. 114
DOS – Economic Support Fund (ESF) ................................................................................... 116
DOS – Global Health Programs (GHP) ................................................................................... 118
DOS – International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement (INCLE).................................. 119
DOS – Nonproliferation, Antiterrorism, Demining, and Related Programs (NADR) ............... 121
DOS – Israeli Arab Scholarship Program (IASP) .................................................................... 123
DOS – Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) .................................................................. 124
DOS – Migration and Refugee Assistance (MRA) .................................................................. 126
DTRA – Cooperative Biological Engagement Program (CBEP)............................................. 127
DTRA – CBRN Preparedness Program (CP2) ....................................................................... 129
DTRA – Global Nuclear Security Program (GNS) .................................................................. 131
DTRA – International Counterproliferation Program (ICP) ...................................................... 132
DTRA – Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI) .......................................................................... 135
DTRA – Strategic Offensive Arms Elimination (SOAE) .......................................................... 138
DTRA – Weapons of Mass Destruction - Proliferation Prevention Program (WMD-PPP) ..... 140
PART 3 ................................................................................................................................................................... 143
RESOURCES BY COUNTRY................................................................................................................ 143
Albania ..................................................................................................................................... 144
Armenia ................................................................................................................................... 145
Azerbaijan ................................................................................................................................ 146
Belarus..................................................................................................................................... 147
Bosnia and Herzegovina ......................................................................................................... 148
Bulgaria.................................................................................................................................... 149
Croatia ..................................................................................................................................... 150
Cyprus ..................................................................................................................................... 151
Czech Republic ....................................................................................................................... 152
Denmark .................................................................................................................................. 153
Estonia ..................................................................................................................................... 154
Finland ..................................................................................................................................... 155
France...................................................................................................................................... 156
Georgia .................................................................................................................................... 157
IV
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Germany .................................................................................................................................. 158

Greece ..................................................................................................................................... 159
Hungary ................................................................................................................................... 160
Iceland ..................................................................................................................................... 161
Ireland ...................................................................................................................................... 162
Israel ........................................................................................................................................ 163
Italy .......................................................................................................................................... 164
Kosovo ..................................................................................................................................... 165
Latvia ....................................................................................................................................... 166
Lithuania .................................................................................................................................. 167
Macedonia ............................................................................................................................... 168
Malta ........................................................................................................................................ 169
Moldova ................................................................................................................................... 170
Montenegro.............................................................................................................................. 171
NATO ....................................................................................................................................... 172
The Netherlands ...................................................................................................................... 173
Norway..................................................................................................................................... 174
OSCE....................................................................................................................................... 175
Poland...................................................................................................................................... 176
Portugal ................................................................................................................................... 177
Romania .................................................................................................................................. 178
Russia ...................................................................................................................................... 179
Serbia....................................................................................................................................... 180
Slovakia ................................................................................................................................... 181
Slovenia ................................................................................................................................... 182
Spain........................................................................................................................................ 183
Sweden .................................................................................................................................... 184
Switzerland .............................................................................................................................. 185
Turkey ...................................................................................................................................... 186
Ukraine .................................................................................................................................... 187
United Kingdom ....................................................................................................................... 188
V
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
This page intentionally left blank
VI
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Part 1
An Introduction to Theater Security
Cooperation Resources
Overview
The Theater Security Cooperation (TSC) process in the U.S. European Command (USEUCOM) is
a comprehensive planning and coordination effort addressing a wide range of TSC activities. A
significant challenge in long-term TSC planning has been linking USEUCOM’s processes with
resourcing mechanisms in order to assure the availability of future resources to support planned
levels of activity. Resources are critical to executing strategy and achieving strategic objectives.
HQ USEUCOM’s intent is to link the command’s various resource processes to the annual strategy
implementation cycle as described in Annex C to USEUCOM Theater Campaign Plan (TCP) 2015
(Operations).
USEUCOM’s Annual Strategy Implementation Cycle
1
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Purpose of this Handbook
This handbook describes TSC resourcing as it applies to the USEUCOM; it is an encyclopedic

reference of the principal funding sources supporting USEUCOM TSC activities. The handbook
also describes the timelines for requesting and allocating funds to activities, and contains an
historic record of funding levels for each resource by program and by country. It is updated semi-
annually as part of USEUCOM’s strategy implementation cycle.
The handbook is intended to address the information needs of the following groups:
Officers and members of the HQ USEUCOM and Component staffs involved in

programmatic TSC planning;
Country team members in the U.S. Embassies and Consulates within the USEUCOM
Area of Responsibility;
Security Assistance Officers, Defense Attachés, and Military Liaison Team members;
All Theater Security Cooperation program participants, i.e. Activity Managers, Force
Providers, Functional Administrators, Planners, and Resource Providers.
References
USEUCOM Theater Campaign Plan, 24 Nov 2015

Annex C to USEUCOM Theater Campaign Plan 2015 (Operations), 13 Jan 2016
USEUCOM Command Instruction, ECI 8103.01, 1 Aug 14, Policy for Use of the Global
Theater Security Cooperation Management Information System (G-TSCMIS) and
Associated Information Systems
Key Terms and Definitions
The following terms are used in the context of this handbook.
Activity: For the purposes of this handbook, an activity is the act of doing something related to
Security Cooperation. For example, an activity may be Humanitarian Assistance visits by US
personnel, US Foreign Military Financing, or port visits by US Naval vessels.
Activity Manager: The Activity Manager is the person or office responsible for activity scheduling,
planning, prioritization, and/or resource allocation for an Activity.
Resources: Funding, manpower, equipment and/or facilities required to support an Activity.

Within the context of this handbook, resources are principally expressed in terms of funding, as all
of the historical resource numbers are expressed in U.S. dollars.
Security Cooperation (SC): The means by which the Department of Defense (DoD) encourages
and enables countries and organizations to work with the United States to achieve strategic
objectives.
2
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Programming for TSC Resources
Security Cooperation activities are supported by a diverse range of resources. Many require the
commitment of military units, some with special capabilities. Others require participation by
individuals or small teams of military personnel, or use DoD facilities. Some resources are used to
directly reimburse the participation of foreign personnel. Literally dozens of special sources are
involved, including Service Operations and Maintenance (O&M) accounts and special funding
sources outside the DoD, most notably DoS. Some funding sources are directly authorized by
Public Law, with particular restrictions on use and individual reporting requirements.
During the annual TSC planning cycle, USEUCOM uses various insertion points to influence
Service and Agency funding, manpower, and forces in support of theater requirements. In practice,
resourcing CCMD plans is accomplished by a combination of the following:
Working through the Planning, Programming, and Budgeting and Execution System
(PPBES), USEUCOM Service components request funding through Service channels to
support CCMD programs.
DoD defense agencies such as the Defense Security Cooperation Agency and the
Defense Threat Reduction Agency request funding based on CCMD inputs.
CCMD priorities for capability shortfalls are communicated through the Integrated Priority
List (IPL). The IPL is developed by HQ USEUCOM with input from the Components and
submitted directly to the Office of the Secretary of Defense.
During the Congressional budget cycle, USEUCOM provides input to members of

Congress and Congressional committees on subjects of importance to USEUCOM in
which the command possesses special expertise. Activity managers articulate the
criticality of their programs to Congress through the USEUCOM Congressional Strategy,
which outlines USEUCOM CDR interaction with Congress. This interaction includes
annual Posture Statement testimony, office calls and legislative appeals.
During the Department of Defense's concurrent Program and Budget Review (PBR), the
USEUCOM and Components submit funding requests in the form of issue papers for
possible approval and inclusion in the President's Budget.
Annual levels of a given resource are, in some cases, established independent of CCMD
plans, but may be apportioned among CCMD programs based on CCMD priorities,
relative expected benefit, or other factors. This is particularly true of resources funded
through Public Law or agencies outside the DoD (i.e., DoS).
TSC Activity Management
Per Ref C, all TSC activities undertaken by USEUCOM staff and Components with resources from
this handbook shall use G-TSCMIS or associated automated information system (e.g., Concept &
Funding Request/CFR, Overseas Humanitarian Assistance Shared Information System/OHASIS,
Joint Training Information Management System/JTIMS and the Command’s Senior/Key Leader
Engagement system) for life cycle management and strategic alignment of activities to Command
priorities.
3
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
USEUCOM Resource Allocation Guidance
Annex C to USEUCOM TCP, Operations (Ref B) provides an overarching strategy implementation

framework for TSC activities. The TCP Lines of Effort (LOEs), based on the Commander’s theater
priorities, focus TSC activities on ‘what we should be doing’. The Intermediate Military Objectives
(IMOs)—derived from Guidance for the Employment of the Force (GEF) Objectives—define the
ends to be achieved. When an LOE is combined with an IMO, the LOE is focused to achieve a
specific objective. Critical Partners (CPs)—countries in the USEUCOM AOR which have a role to
support objective achievement—are then identified to further refine the framework for TSC
activities. The final construct in the strategy implementation framework, the Line of Activity (LOA),
is a deliberately planned set of activities to achieve an objective in cooperation with a specific
country. LOAs are on the border between strategic guidance and activity execution; they are the
principal medium through which specific IMOs are achieved. LOAs are assigned in Country
Cooperation Plans (CCP) and tasked to USEUCOM staff, SOCEUR, and components through the
USEUCOM Theater Campaign Order (TCO). Almost all TSC activities will fall under LOAs in CCP
guidance. CCP's further define the LOAs with desired outcomes, which must be supported by
implementation tasks undertaken by component commands and activity managers. The resources
contained in this handbook are the means through which the tasks in the LOAs are executed to
accomplish the desired outcome.
4
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Part 2
Resource Details
5
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
ACSA – Acquisition and Cross-Servicing Agreements

Description:
An ACSA is a bilateral international agreement between the US DoD and authorized foreign militaries
or international organizations that permits the exchange of Logistic Support, Supplies and Services
(LSSS) on a reimbursable basis. It complements Foreign Military Sales, Direct Commercial Sales, as
well as standard contracting procedures. An ACSA provides the following:
 The means to meet logistics shortfall emergencies

 A reduction in the logistics tail
 Flexibility to the commander
 Worldwide coverage
 Mil to Mil interoperability
ACSA Reference library: https://intellipedia.intelink.gov/wiki/ACSA
Legal Basis:
 Title 10, United States Code - Sections 2341-2350

 DoDD 2010.9, 28 April 2003
 CJCSI 2120.01D, 21 May 2015
 DoD 7000.14-R, Volume 11A, Chapter 8
 ECI 4001.01, 28 Aug 2013
Request Procedures:
 Either nation places a written order (Standard ACSA order form (2006) or Form 1-3a)
 Individual orders under ACSA must be mutually agreed and consistent with both countries’
national priorities
 Becomes a binding document upon acceptance (signature by appointed ACSA order official)
 The supplying nation sources the LSSS
 Transactions are reimbursable by monetary payment, replacement in kind, or equal value
exchange
 Reciprocal pricing used for acquisition or transfer (use price charged to one’s own military)
 Both nations reconcile the order
 All ACSA transactions must be entered into the ACSA Global Automated Tracking and
Reporting System (AGATRS) per CJCSI 2120.01D
Lines of Activity Supported:
 Air Operational Access, Air Ops Spt, Maintenance and Logistics Capacity, Aviation C4I
Interoperability, Combined Air Ops Interoperability/Deployable/Std, Combined Land Forces
Capability/Interop/Deployable, Land Operations Capacity and Capability, SOF Operations,
Actions, and Activities (OAAs), Maritime Operations Capacity and Capability, Combined
Maritime Inter/Deploy/Standardization, Combined Naval Infantry Inter/Deploy/Std, Naval
Infantry Operations Capability/Capacity, C4 Interoperability, Disaster Preparedness Capacity,
Operational Logistics Capability, Regional Partnering and Collaboration
6
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
EUCOM Acquisition & Cross-Servicing Agreement (ACSA) List as of 21 Sep 16

*All EUCOM ACSAs are non-expiring*
Template
Country Number Concluded Type Notes, current status of ACSA
Version
Albania USA-ALB-02 23-Sep-15 ACSA 2006 ACSA up to date
Armenia USA-ARM-02 3-Nov-15 ACSA 2006 ACSA up to date
Austria US-AU-01 15-Mar-00 ACSA pre-2006 Negotiations for updated ACSA in-process
Azerbaijan USA-AZE-02 23-Jan-14 ACSA 2006 ACSA up to date
Belgium 11-May-82 MLSA pre-2006 Updated ACSA negotiated; in coord in DC
Bosnia / Her USA-BiH-02 9-Jun-15 ACSA 2006 ACSA up to date
Bulgaria US-BU-01 21-Feb-01 ACSA pre-2006 Updated ACSA negotiated; in coord in DC
Croatia USA-HRZ-02 1-Aug-12 ACSA 2006 ACSA up to date
Czech Rep US-CZ-01 2-Feb-16 ACSA 2006 ACSA up to date
Denmark US-DE-02 8-Jan-98 ACSA pre-2006 Plan to negotiate updated ACSA in 2016-17
Estonia US-EST-02 1-Jul-08 ACSA 2006 ACSA up to date
Finland USA-FIN-02 9-Jul-08 ACSA 2006 ACSA up to date
France USA-FRA-02 13-Sep-13 ACSA 2006 ACSA up to date
Georgia USA-GEO-02 6-Jun-13 ACSA 2006 ACSA up to date
Germany 21-Jan-83 MSA pre-2006 Plan to negotiate updated ACSA in 2017-18
Greece 5-Aug-96 MLSA pre-2006 Negotiations for updated ACSA are in-process
Hungary USA-HUN-02 10-Dec-14 ACSA 2006 ACSA up to date
Iceland USA-ISL-01 1-Feb-13 ACSA 2006 ACSA up to date
Ireland USA-IRL-02 17-Jun-14 ACSA 2006 ACSA up to date
Israel US-ISR-03 29-Jun-08 ACSA pre-2006 Plan to negotiate updated ACSA in 2017-18
Italy US-IT-02 15-Apr-01 ACSA pre-2006 Plan to negotiate updated ACSA in 2016-17
Kosovo USA-KOS-01 27-Jan-14 ACSA 2006 ACSA up to date
Latvia USA-LVA-02 15-Oct-08 ACSA 2006 ACSA up to date
Lithuania USA-LTU-02 31-May-06 LSSSA pre-2006 Plan to negotiate updated ACSA in 2016-17
Luxembourg USA-LUX-01 15-May-15 ACSA 2006 ACSA up to date
Macedonia USA-MKL-02 22-Sep-08 ACSA 2006 ACSA up to date
Moldova USA-MDA-02 25-Nov-13 ACSA 2006 ACSA up to date
Montenegro USA-MNE-01 25-Sep-07 ACSA 2006 ACSA up to date
NSPO US-NSPO-01 25-Feb-13 ACSA 2006 ACSA up to date
NC3O/NCIO US-NC3O-01 27-May-11 ACSA 2006 ACSA up to date
Netherlands US-NL-01 22-Feb-83 MSA pre-2006 Updated ACSA negotiated; in coord in DC
Norway USA-NOR-02 5-Aug-09 ACSA 2006 ACSA up to date
Poland US-POL-02 3-Dec-12 ACSA 2006 ACSA up to date
Portugal US-PRT-02 8-Dec-09 ACSA 2006 ACSA up to date
Romania USA-ROU-02 23-Jan-14 ACSA 2006 ACSA up to date
Serbia USA-SRB-01 8-Nov-06 ACSA pre-2006 Plan to negotiate updated ACSA in 2017-18
SHAPE 31-Jan-95 MLS pre-2006 Plan to negotiate updated ACSA in 2016-17
Slovakia US-SK-01 15-Dec-98 ACSA pre-2006 Plan to negotiate updated ACSA in 2016-17
7
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Slovenia USA-SVN-02 11-Nov-15 ACSA 2006 ACSA up to date

Spain US-ESP-03 9-May-11 ACSA 2006 ACSA up to date
Sweden US-SW-01 11-Sep-03 ACSA pre-2006 Updated ACSA negotiated; in coord in DC
Switzerland US-SZ-01 6-Dec-01 ACSA pre-2006 Plan to negotiate updated ACSA in 2017-18
Turkey US-TU-01 2-Aug-96 ACSA pre-2006 Granted authority to conclude updated ACSA
UK USA-GBR-02 7-Jan-07 MOU pre-2006 No plan to update ACSA based on UK position
Ukraine US-UP-01 19-Nov-99 ACSA pre-2006 Plan to negotiate updated ACSA in 2017-18
USEUCOM Point of Contact:
POCs Email Address
Anthony Munson, ECJ4 430-4509 anthony.r.munson.civ@mail.mil
8
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
BPC – Building Partnership Capacity

Description:
In FY10, EUCOM requested establishment of a program of record to provide training and equipment
to allies / foreign partner nations. While EUCOM did not obtain additional authority to provide training
and equipment to partner nations, OSD did approve $4M / year, initially, based on EUCOM’s request,
to support BPC activities within the scope of available legal authorities. The intent of the BPC fund is
to support activities related or leading to partner nation participation in coalition operations in the
EUCOM Area of Responsibility (AOR). Most BPC authorities support individual countries’ authorized
participation in combined exercises, activities supporting operations, and seminars, conferences or
workshops related to coalition operations.
Legal Basis:
Funding can only be expended under existing DOD authorities. Some qualifying activities and
expenditures include: ally/foreign partner nation participation in planning conferences, TDY for
personnel related to coalition operation, pre-deployment site surveys, assessments of ally/foreign
partner nation capabilities for EUCOM purposes, some activities supporting U.S. operations to train
and equip allies/partner nations, seminars or conferences related to coalition operations, ally/foreign
partner nation participation in combined exercises , and personnel for program
management/execution. Payment of ally/foreign partner nation costs incurred as a direct result of
participation is generally limited to developing countries in accordance with 10 U.S.C. § 1051 (for
conference/seminars/meetings) or 10 U.S.C. § 2010 (for exercises).
Some examples of engagements authorized for BPC funding include but are not limited to:
 Personnel and information exchanges
 Familiarization events
 Regional conferences, seminars, and workshops held primarily in the AOR
 Unit exchanges
 State Partnership Program events
 Staff assistance visits
 Training program reviews and assessments for EUCOM purposes
 Ship rider programs
 Program administration, such as supplies, equipment, travel, and translation services
Engagements NOT authorized for BPC funding

 Any activity specifically denied by congress
 The acquisition of weapons systems and major end items
 Research and development
 Training of militaries normally funded with International Military Education and Training
(IMET) or Foreign Military Sales (FMS)
 Travel normally associated with traditional EUCOM directorate, military component, or other
organization business
 Meals, mementos and entertainment specifically authorized as part of Official
Representational Funds (ORF)
 Humanitarian and Civic Assistance (HCA) (except for incidental costs) and
Humanitarian/Disaster Relief
9
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
 Direct support to foreign countries or providing equipment to foreign countries, including

supplementation of funds provided by FMS or by any provision of the Foreign Assistance Act
 Exercise Related Construction (ERC) and Military Construction (MILCON) projects
 US MILPAY for program execution
 Multiple Lines of Activity supported due to Mil to Mil activity.
USEUCOM Funding History: All values are in millions of dollars
BPC FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17

Requested $3.200 $4.000 $4.000 $4.000 $4.000 $1.000 $1.0 $1.0
Allocated $4.000 $3.600 $3.600 $2.600 $1.200 $0.978 $0.896 $1.006
Obligated $2.800 $2.600 $2.500 $1.200 $0.610 $0.157 $0.896 TBD
Funding by Country/Theater: All values are in millions of dollars
Country FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16

Albania $0.100 $0.320 $0.042 $0.000 $0.003 $0.010 $0.010
Armenia $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.018 $0.022 $0.000 $0.000
Azerbaijan $0.190 $0.040 $0.081 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Bulgaria $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.058 $0.080 $0.019 $0.000
Croatia $0.120 $0.010 $0.032 $0.029 $0.005 $0.000 $0.000
Czech Republic $0.080 $0.060 $0.017 $0.000 $0.003 $0.019 $0.000
Estonia $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.019 $0.007 $0.001 $0.000
Georgia $0.070 $0.030 $0.052 $0.008 $0.036 $0.000 $0.000
Greece $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.013 TBD
Kosovo $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.053 $0.069 $0.009 $0.036
Latvia $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.026 $0.000
Lithuania $0.090 $0.010 $0.055 $0.013 $0.065 $0.001 $0.000
Macedonia $0.080 $0.020 $0.021 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Poland $0.050 $0.020 $0.152 $0.037 $0.018 $0.000 $0.000
Montenegro $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.013
Romania $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.032 $0.075 $0.033 $0.006
Serbia $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.006 $0.014 $0.000 $0.000
Slovakia $0.050 $0.050 $0.012 $0.004 $0.012 $0.000 $0.000
Slovenia $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.013 $0.000
Ukraine $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.009 $0.023
United States $0.560 $2.000 $2.040 $0.023 $0.156 $0.004 $0.811
TOTAL $1.390 $2.560 $2.500 $0.000 $0.610 $0.157 $0.896
10
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
POC Email Address
LTC Tom Fuller, ECJ5-SCP, 430-5656 thomas.b.fuller.mil@mail.mil
11
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CCIF – CCDR Initiative Fund

Description:
Congress provided for a CINC Initiative Fund (now known as the Combatant Commander – CCDR–
Initiative Fund, or CCIF) designed specifically to enhance the Unified CINCs' (now known as
Geographic CCMD) warfighting capabilities and to be administered by CJCS. CJCS has
subsequently directed that these funds only be made available for "Low Cost, High Benefit CINC
Requirements" (i.e., Joint Exercises, Force Training, Contingencies, Command and Control,
Readiness and Sustainability Objectives, etc.), and allocated competitively, rather than on a formula
basis amongst all of the Geographic CCMDs. The primary focus of CCIF is to support unforeseen
contingency requirements critical to Combatant Commands’ joint warfighting readiness and national
security interests. .
CCIF is subject to Congressional appropriation and has reflected varying amounts each year. The
Chairman may withhold a portion of the funds for use in support of CCMD contingencies that may
arise during the year; however, funds are not allocated by apportioning a fixed percentage to each
CCMD.
CJCSI 7401.01G (21 Sep 15) is the governing document for submission criteria and amplifying
information is provided yearly through the JCS fund manager, JCS J7.
Although the fund is managed by CJCS, all funding allocation is approved by OSD. The process
takes an average of eight-weeks from the time the request is submitted, until the time the funds are
transferred from the JS Comptroller to the geographic CCMD.
Legal Basis and Implementing Regulations:
a. 10 U.S.C. § 166a
b. 10 U.S.C. § 166b
c. 10 U.S.C. § 401
d. DoD Instruction 2000.16, 2 October 2006, “DoD Antiterrorism (AT) Standards”
e. CJCSI 7401.01G, Combatant Commander Initiative Fund, 21 September 2015
f. CJCSI 5261.01 series
g. ECI 7000.02A, Administration and Control of Finances, Enclosure B, 24 March 2015
Implementing Regulations
(a) CCDR Initiative Fund (CJCSI 7401.O1G). From funds made available in any fiscal year for the
budget account in the Department of Defense known as the "Combatant Commander Initiative
Fund,” the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff may provide funds to the commander of a
combatant command, upon the request of the commander, or, with respect to a geographic area
or areas not within the area of responsibility of a commander of a combatant command, to an
officer designated by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff for such purpose. The Chairman
may provide such funds for any of the authorized activities detailed below at (b).
(b) Authorized activities. Activities submitted for funding under this program must qualify within
one of the following authorized activities:
(1) Joint Exercises and Joint Warfighting Capabilities and Force Training.
(2) Contingencies and Selected Operations.
12
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
(3) Humanitarian and Civic Assistance, to include Urgent and Unanticipated Humanitarian
Relief and Reconstruction (UHRR) Assistance.
(4) Command and Control.
(5) Military Education and Training for Military and Related Civilian Personnel of Foreign
Countries (including transportation, translation, and administrative expenses).
(6) Personnel Expenses of Defense Personnel for Bilateral or Regional Cooperation
Programs.
(7) Force Protection.
(c) Priority. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in considering requests for funds in the
COCOM Initiative Fund, should give priority consideration to:
(1) requests for funds are to be used for unforeseen contingency requirements critical to the
Combatant Commands’ joint warfighting readiness and national security interest; and
(2) the provision of funds to be used for activities with respect to an area or areas not within
the area of responsibility of a Commander of a combatant command that would reduce
the threat to, or otherwise increase, the national security of the United States.
(3) the provision of funds to be used for urgent and unanticipated humanitarian relief and
reconstruction assistance, particularly in a foreign country where the armed forces are
engaged in a contingency operation.
(d) Relationship to other funding. Any amount provided by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of
Staff during any fiscal year out of the COCOM Initiative Fund for an activity referred to in (b) shall
be in addition to amounts otherwise available for that activity for that fiscal year.
(e) Limitations.
(1) Of funds made available under this section for any fiscal year:
(A) not more than $20,000,000 may be used to purchase items with a unit cost in excess
of investment/expense threshold
(B) not more than $10,000,000 may be used to pay for any expenses of foreign countries
participating in joint exercises as authorized by subsection (4h)(1). Funds may not be
used to purchase equipment or other items that are to be transferred to the armed
forces of a foreign country; and
(C) not more than $5,000,000 may be used to provide military education and training
(including transportation, translation, and administrative expenses) to military and
related civilian personnel of foreign countries as authorized by subsection (4h)(5).
(2) Funds may not be provided under this section for any activity that has been denied
authorization by Congress.
(f) Description of activities funded during FY12-14

(1) Pre-deployment Training Events - $148,000
(2) Pre-deployment Training Events - $88,000
(3) Partner Nation Seminar - $104,649
(4) Brigade Training Events - $227,918
(5) CONPLAN - $6,339,104
(6) NAVEUR Combined Force Maritime Component Commanders (CFMCC) Course
- $5,043
(7) European Security Seminar - $38,546
13
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CCIF FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17

Requested $8.000 $13.900 $6.500 $0.089 $0.043 $0.000 $0.000
Allocated $8.000 $13.900 $6.500 $0.089 $0.043 $0.000 $0.000
Used $8.000 $13.900 $6.500 $0.089 $0.043 $0.000 $0.000
CCIF FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16

Theater $8.000 $13.900 $6.300 $0.089 $0.043 $0.000 $0.000
TOTAL $8.000 $13.900 $6.300 $0.089 $0.043 $0.000 $0.000
Request Procedures:
POC Email Address

Mr. David Pryber, ECCM 430-7567 david.j.pryber.civ@mail.mil
14
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CDI – Combating Weapons of Mass Destruction (CWMD)

Cooperative Defense Initiative
Description:
The CDI program allows the command to conduct bilateral and multilateral BPC activities with select
countries to increase regional CWMD cooperation, interoperability, and partner nation capability to
address CWMD gaps. The goal is to develop capable partners in the AOR who can assume more
responsibility for CWMD mission areas and reduce the need for US CBRN/CWMD forces and
resources. The target audience for CDI activities must include at least 51% military/Ministry of
Defense focused organizations.
Legal Basis:
Funding can only be expended under existing DOD fiscal authorities. Some qualifying activities and
expenditures include: ally/partner nation participation in planning conferences, other TDY of US
personnel related to coalition operation, pre-deployment site surveys, assessments of ally/partner
nation capabilities for EUCOM purposes, some activities supporting U.S. operations to train and
equip allies/partner nations, seminars or conferences related to coalition operations, ally/partner
nation participation in combined exercises, and personnel for program management/execution.
Payment of ally/partner nation costs is generally limited to developing countries in accordance with
10 USC § 1051 (for conference/seminars/meetings), 10 USC § 2010 (for exercises), or Section 1251
of NDAA FY16 (training for eastern European national military forces in the course of multilateral
exercises).
Some examples of engagements authorized for CDI funding include but are not limited to:
· Personnel and information exchanges
· Familiarization events
· Regional conferences, seminars, and workshops held primarily in the AOR
· Unit exchanges
· State Partnership Program events
· Staff assistance visits
· Training program reviews and assessments for EUCOM purposes
· Program administration, such as supplies, equipment, travel, and translation services
Engagements NOT authorized for CDI funding:

· Any activity specifically denied by Congress
· The acquisition of weapons systems and major end items
· Research and development
· Training of militaries normally funded with International Military Education and Training (IMET) or
Foreign Military Sales (FMS)
· Travel normally associated with traditional EUCOM directorate, military component, or other
organization business
· Meals, mementos and entertainment specifically authorized as part of Official Representational
Funds (ORF)
· Humanitarian and Civic Assistance (HCA) and Humanitarian/Disaster Relief (except for incidentals)
· Direct support to foreign countries or providing equipment to foreign countries, including
supplementation of funds provided by FMS or by any provision of the Foreign Assistance Act
· Exercise Related Construction (ERC)
· Military Construction (MILCON) projects
15
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
· U.S. MILPAY for program execution
 WMD Proliferation Prevention

 WMD/CBRN Consequence Management (CM)
CDI FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17

Requested $0.000 $0.000 $0.050 $0.750 $1.000 $1.100 $1.200 $1.200
Allocated $0.000 $0.000 $0.050 $0.409 $0.659 $0.761 $0.765 $0.794
Used $0.000 $0.000 $0.050 $0.409 $0.659 $0.761 $0.765

Albania $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.041 $0.050 $0.124
Armenia $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.015 $0.056
Azerbaijan $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.025 $0.000 $0.013 $0.000
Balkans(-) $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.094 $0.037
Bulgaria $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.100 $0.030 $0.021 $0.000
Croatia $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.036 $0.000 $0.000
Estonia $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.019
Georgia $0.000 $0.000 $0.020 $0.025 $0.353 $0.155 $0.118
Israel $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.018 $0.052 $0.129
Kosovo $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.100 $0.085 $0.031 $0.020
Lithuania $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.123 $0.000
Macedonia $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.030 $0.045
Moldova $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.015 $0.015 $0.031
NATO $0.000 $0.000 $0.010 $0.050 $0.063 $0.127 $0.100
Romania $0.000 $0.000 $0.020 $0.100 $0.012 $0.007 $0.074
Ukraine $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.028 $0.012
TOTAL $0.000 $0.000 $0.050 $0.400 $0.659 $0.761 $0.765
(-) Majority of Balkans totals involve RACVIAC-Centre for Security Cooperation multi-lateral engagements.
USEUCOM Points of Contact:

POC Email Address
Lt Col Kim Leba, DTRA J-2-5 LNO , 430-7374 kim.t.leba.mil@mail.mil
LTC William Sumner, ECJ5-W, 430-7875 william.e.sumner2.mil@mail.mil
LTC Joseph Kling, ECJ5-W, 430-7862 joseph.a.kling.mil@mail.mil
16
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CE – Civic Engagement
Humanitarian Assistance (HA): The EUCOM HA program is a Security Cooperation tool provided
through the Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) under guidance from OSD/SHA-SOLIC.
Section 2561 of Title 10 provides authority for use of Overseas Humanitarian Disaster and Civic
Assistance (OHDACA) funds to carry out humanitarian assistance projects. OHDACA is a two-year,
DoD appropriation.
Humanitarian Assistance-Excess Property (HAP-EP): Section 2557 of Title 10 provides authority

for DoD to donate excess non-lethal property to foreign governments and civilian organizations as
requested by DoS/DoD personnel in American embassies. This program utilizes OHDACA funds
which are centrally-controlled and executed by DSCA.
Humanitarian and Civic Assistance Program (HCA): Section 401 of Title 10 authorizes
USEUCOM components to conduct Humanitarian and Civic Assistance projects while on operational
deployments to include exercises and deployments for training. This program utilizes O&M funds,
which are valid for one fiscal year.
The principal constraint central with all three Civic Engagement programs is that they may only be
used to benefit the civilian population. Additionally, HCA nominated projects must also specifically be
focused on enhancing US military readiness skills. The DoD HA Program(s) are geared toward
improving visibility, access and influence in the partner nation.
Responsibilities:
It is the responsibility of the ODC team to nominate HA/EP/HCA projects which have US
Ambassador approval and support their respective Country Cooperation Plans. The EUCOM Civic
Engagement office coordinates priorities with ECJ5 based on EUCOM strategy, reviews each
request to ensure it meets the program requirements, and then staffs through Legal, USAID and the
respective EUCOM desk officer. DSCA and OSD-P provide final approval for projects.
Legal Basis, Regulations, and Policy Guidance:
 Transportation of humanitarian relief supplies to foreign countries: 10 U.S.C. § 402

 Humanitarian assistance: 10 U.S.C. §2561
 Excess nonlethal supplies: 10 U.S.C. §2557
 Humanitarian and civic assistance provided in conjunction with military operations:
10 U.S.C. § 401
 DoDI 2205.02, Humanitarian and Civic Assistance (HCA) Activities, 23 June 2014
 DoD Message, SUBJECT: Policy Guidance for DoD Humanitarian Assistance (HA)
Programs, including those HA Activities funded by the Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster, and
Civic Aid Appropriation, released 10 August 2016
 ECG 3225.01, Guidance for Execution of the USEUCOM Humanitarian Assistance (HA)
Program, 20 June 2014
 Essential Services Capacity

 Disaster Management Capability
17
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
USEUCOM OHDACA Funding History: All values are in millions of dollars
CE FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17

Requested $38.000 $43.000 $17.800 $19.500 $20.700 $29,250 $18.62
Allocated $11.907 $10.266 $10.288 $10.300 $12.30 $11.00 *
Used $11.907 $10.223 $10.179 $10.250 $12.30 $7.06 *
*Note: FY17 OHDACA funds pending receipt from DSCA.
OHDACA Funding by Country: All values are in millions of dollars
Country FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY 17

Albania $1.019 $0.525 $0.575 $0.795 $0.400 $0.500 $0.00
Armenia $0.525 $0.325 $0.811 $0.352 $0.440 $0.642 $0.00
Azerbaijan $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.951 $0.873 $0.700 $0.00
BiH $1.500 $0.494 $0.847 $0.670 $0.780 $0.650 $0.00
Bulgaria $0.231 $0.852 $1.182 $0.775 $0.404 $0.00 $0.00
Croatia $0.000 $0.000 $0.920 $1.200 $1.045 $0.00 $0.00
Estonia $0.000 $0.650 $0.000 $0.000 $0.500 $0.408 $0.00
Georgia $0.752 $1.281 $0.952 $0.685 $0.965 $0.00 $0.00
Kosovo $2.359 $0.886 $0.353 $0.000 $1.386 $0.543 $0.00
Latvia $1.014 $0.876 $0.308 $0.422 $1.200 $0.00 $0.00
Lithuania - - - - $0.400 $0.374 $0.00
Macedonia $0.845 $0.805 $1.118 $0.700 $0.541 $0.500 $0.00
Moldova $0.414 $0.992 $0.795 $1.060 $1.103 $0.845 $0.00
Montenegro $0.010 $0.715 $0.000 $0.305 $0.508 $0.466 $0.00
Romania $0.713 $0.344 $0.559 $0.590 $0.400 $0.015 $0.00
Serbia $0.598 $0.590 $1.127 $0.635 $0.509 $0.665 $0.00
Ukraine $1.927 $0.222 $0.815 $1.105 $0.838 $0.750 $0.00
USEUCOM HCA Funding History: All values are in millions of dollars
HCA FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY 17

Requested $0.900 $0.818 $0.900 $1.30 $1.30
Allocated $0.818 $0.732 $0.763 $0.813 $0.00
Used $0.781 $0.565 $0.619 $0.716 $0.00
18
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
HCA Funding by Country: All values are in millions of dollars
Country FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16

Albania $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.082
Armenia $0.000 $0.030 $0.054 $0.083
Azerbaijan $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
BiH $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Bulgaria $0.051 $0.068 $0.058 $0.131
Croatia $0.072 $0.091 $0.079 $0.065
Estonia $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.027
Georgia $0.026 $0.040 $0.031 $0.000
Kosovo $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Latvia $0.128 $0.252 $0.162 $0.154
Macedonia $0.000 $0.034 $0.000 $0.000
Moldova $0.029 $0.084 $0.063 $0.067
Montenegro $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Romania $0.464 $0.015 $0.055 $0.061
Serbia $0.000 $0.000 $0.117 $0.000
Ukraine $0.011 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Request Procedures:
HA and EP projects are nominated annually (NLT 1 May) to the EUCOM Civic Engagement
Branch, which then submits the CCMD’s OHDACA strategy and budget request to DSCA (NLT 1
July). Once fully developed and submitted by the ODC, each project is staffed for concurrence with
USAID, EUCOM Legal, ECJ5 Desk Officers, and DSCA for final approval.
HCA projects are nominated annually (NLT 1 August) to the EUCOM Civic Engagement Branch,
which then coordinates with EUCOM ECCM for its budget allocation. Once fully developed and
submitted by the ODC, each project is staffed for concurrence with USAID, EUCOM Legal, ECJ5
Desk Officers, and Joint Staff HCA Program Manager for final approval. The HCA Program is
supported by each of the military departments. The U. S. Army allocates funds to EUCOM and
SOUTHCOM; the Navy funds PACOM; and the U. S. Air Force funds CENTCOM.
POC Email Address

Mr. Claude V. Galluzzo
claude.v.galluzzo.civ@mail.mil
Civic Engagement Branch Chief
DSN 430-7474
19
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CN – Counter-Narcotics Support
Description:
USEUCOM Joint Interagency Counter Trafficking Center, Counter-Narcotics Division’s (JICTC-

CN & Counter Threat Finance (CTF)) funding is used for partner nation capacity-building to
assist partner nations with CN train & equip programs, CFT Training, infrastructure and facility
renovations and information sharing to combat the threat of illicit trafficking within and through
their sovereign territories. CTF provides additional investigation support against Transnational
Crime Organizations (TCO) by tracking the finances of these illicit groups. In accordance with
CJCSI 3710.1B, USEUCOM JICTC-CN can provide the following types of support:
Transportation support (controlled deliveries); the establishment and operation of bases of

operation or training facilities; maintenance, repair and upgrade of equipment; counter-narcotics
related training of drug law enforcement personnel; establishment of command, control, and
computer networks; provision of linguists and intelligence analysis; and aerial and ground
reconnaissance
Legal Basis/References:
 10 U.S.C. §124
 Section 1004, FY-91 NDAA, as amended recently by Section 1012, FY15 NDAA
 Section 1031, FY-97 NDAA
 Section 1033, FY-98 NDAA, as amended
 DoDI 4270.37, Unspecified Minor Military Construction Projects pursuant to DOD
Counterdrug Authority, 18 May 2011
 CJCSI 3710.01B, 26 Jan 2007, DOD Counterdrug Support
USEUCOM CN support is authorized under Title 10 (124 and 371-379) and Section 1004 of
FY91 NDAA, as amended most recently by Section1012 of FY15 NDAA, for counter-narcotics
support. Under Section 1022 of FY04 NDAA, CN funding may also be used to support law
enforcement agencies supporting counter-terrorism activities if a counter drug nexus exists and
approval is granted by SECDEF. Under Section 1033, CN funding can be used to purchase
and equip partner nations if the recipient country is on the approved DoD Section 1033 list;
FY16 NDAA added Kenya and Tanzania as countries eligible for assistance.
 Counter-Narcotics Capacity
USEUCOM Funding History: All values are in millions of dollars (includes JICTC-CN Operational,
personnel (CN & CTF), Reserve Component (RC) Support and SOF CN Support funds)
CN FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17

Requested $15.462 $14.968 $13.521 $9.485 $6.684 $5.576 $5.582 $5.429
Allocated $9.426 $7.963 $9.304 $6.984 $4.868 $5.500 $5.582 0
Used $9.426 $7.963 $9.304 $6.851 $4.817 $4.368 $4.821 0
20
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Funding by Country/Theater: All values are in millions of dollars (includes only CN support
projects – Operational, Reserve Component support, and HQ Support (CN & CTF))

Albania $0.200 $0.100 $0.065 $0.077 $0.000 $0.005 $0.000
Armenia $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.083 $0.000
Austria $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Azerbaijan $0.200 $0.000 $0.000 $0.531 $0.057 $0.000 $0.000
BiH $0.200 $0.150 $0.000 $0.066 $0.000 $0.004 $0.087
Bulgaria $0.200 $0.900 $1.200 $0.374 $0.035 $0.002 $0.000
Croatia $0.000 $0.000 $0.212 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Cyprus $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.036
Czech Rep $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.045
Estonia $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Greece $0.100 $0.475 $0.500 $0.000 $0.242 $0.081 $0.127
Georgia $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.063 $0.052 $0.000
Israel $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.011
Kosovo $0.000 $0.143 $0.193 $0.110 $0.000 $0.066 $0.177
Latvia $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.080 $0.036
Macedonia $0.200 $0.000 $0.000 $0.144 $0.019 $1.528 $0.167
Malta $0.200 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.120
Montenegro $0.200 $0.090 $0.090 $0.000 $0.000 $0.007 $0.000
Romania $0.200 $0.776 $0.000 $0.406 $0.008 $0.030 $0.137
Portugal $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.054
Russia $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.005 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Serbia $0.200 $0.250 $0.250 $0.068 $0.000 $0.005 $0.310
Slovakia $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.026
Spain $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.086 $0.086 $0.346
Turkey $0.200 $0.946 $0.701 $0.378 $0.427 $0.078 $0.223
Ukraine $0.000 $0.080 $0.080 $0.000 $0.000 $0.120 $0.160
Theater $7.326 $4.053 $6.013 $4.687 $3.931 $2.479 $2.759
TOTAL $9.426 $7.963 $9.304 $6.851 $4.868 $4.706 $4.821
Request Procedures:
Country Teams (usually law enforcement working group members, but also Chiefs of Mission or
RSOs) within the USEUCOM AOR submit a request to JICTC-CN for a CN Theater Security
Cooperation project or investigative support. This request from a US law enforcement agency is
the legal basis for JICTC-CN funding of a project. USEUCOM JICTC-CN validates the request
(drug nexus exists), obtains USEUCOM legal review and submits it to the DASD CN & GT for
concurrence and funding authorization. Once approved, USEUCOM JCTC-CN coordinates with
the Country Team/law enforcement agency for execution of the requested support.
21
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
POC Email Address

michael.s.mcloughlin.civ@smil.mail.mil
Mr. Michael S. McLoughlin, ECJ9-
JICTC-CN DSN 314-430-2946
michael.s.mcloughlin.civ@mail.mil
22
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CRSP – Coalition Readiness Support Program

Description:
The Coalition Readiness Support Program (CRSP) is a sub-set of the Coalition Support Fund (CSF)
authority which authorizes the Department of Defense (DoD) to provide specialized training, to
procure and provide supplies, and to procure specialized equipment for loan, on a non-reimbursable
basis, to eligible coalition forces supporting U.S. military and stability operations in Afghanistan and to
counter the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (counter-ISIL operations).
Coalition Readiness Support Program is authorized as part of CSF by section 1233 of the NDAA for
FY08, as amended and by annual DoD Appropriations Acts. CRSP funds are appropriated annually
as part of CSF in Defense Security Cooperation Agency’s (DSCA) Overseas Contingency
Operations (OCO) Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide (O&M, DW) appropriation.
Coalition Readiness Support Program is authorized and funded for the purposes of:
 Facilitating safe and effective deployment of eligible coalition forces supporting U.S. military
operations in Afghanistan and (counter-ISIL operations);
 Achieving a cost savings by creating a rotational pool of equipment available for loan on a
non-reimbursable basis to eligible coalition forces supporting U.S. military operations in
Afghanistan and (counter-ISIL operations) ; and
 Ensuring eligible coalition forces supporting U.S. military operations in Afghanistan and
(counter-ISIL operations) have current and interoperable safety equipment thus potentially
reducing casualties for both coalition and U.S. forces.
Coalition Readiness Support Program is available to eligible coalition forces supporting

U.S. operations in Afghanistan and/or (counter-ISIL operations) or when the Commander, U.S.
Central Command (USCENTCOM) (or his/her designee), verifies the support provided by the
coalition forces supports the U.S. military operation in these theaters of operation. This provision is
included within the Department’s appropriation for Coalition Support Funds and as such is subject
to financial management procedures established by the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller).
Before providing specialized training or procuring and providing supplies or specialized equipment
to coalition forces, the Secretary of Defense must obtain the concurrence of the Secretary of State,
consult with the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and notify the
congressional defense committees 15 days before releasing CSF funding for this purpose. These
requirements necessitate careful planning to ensure adequate processing time, which can take a
minimum of eight weeks, is included in operational timelines.
Responsibilities:
European Command (EUCOM), in the role as a Supporting COCOM (AOR includes Partner
Nations requesting assistance), is responsible for:
 Identifying Ally/partner nation requirements for assistance;

 Developing and submitting a request for consideration to OUSD (Policy), OUSD
(Comptroller), and DSCA; and
23
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
 Endorsing specialized training, supplies, and/or equipment requested by countries within

the supported command area of responsibility as further defined in the approval processes
documented below.
Legal Basis:
1. Annual DoD Appropriations Acts.
2. Section 1233 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (P.L. 110-181,
January 28, 2008), “REIMBURSEMENT OF CERTAIN COALITION NATIONS FOR SUPPORT
PROVIDED TO UNITED STATES MILITARY OPERATIONS,” as most recently amended by section
1212 of the NDAA for FY2016 (P.L. 114-92, November 25,, 2015).
Definitions:
 Eligible Coalition Forces: Eligible coalition forces are forces from countries 1) that meet the
Criteria for Approval, 2) that have made a commitment to deploy forces to Afghanistan and
counter-ISIL operations, and 3) whose deploying forces require specialized training and
supplies or loan of specialized equipment in order to operate effectively on the battlefield.
Eligible coalition forces deployed in support of the Resolute Support Mission (RSM) in
Afghanistan are also eligible for support so long as those forces are deployed to Afghanistan
to support United States military operational requirements. The current list of eligible
coalition countries is contained in the following table:
Albania El Salvador Lithuania Romania

Armenia Estonia Macedonia Serbia
Azerbaijan Georgia Moldova Slovakia
Bahrain Honduras Mongolia Slovenia
Bosnia & Herzegovina Hungary Montenegro Tajikistan
Bulgaria Indonesia Nepal Thailand
Colombia Jordan Nicaragua Tonga
Croatia Kazakhstan Oman Turkey
Czech Republic Kyrgyz Republic Peru Turkmenistan
Dominican Republic Latvia Philippines Ukraine
Egypt Lebanon Poland Uzbekistan
 Criteria for Approval: As a matter of policy, the Department uses two criteria to evaluate
whether or not a country should receive provision of training, supplies, or equipment from
the United States:
 The coalition forces to be provided training or supplies or loaned specialized equipment

are essential to the success of U.S. military operations, and
 The coalition forces would not be able to participate in the U.S. military operation but for
the provision of training, supplies, or equipment by the United States.
 Specialized Training: Training provided to coalition forces that lack the tactical capabilities
needed to operate successfully and safely in distinct combat environments. Examples
24
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
include training forces on counter-improvised explosive device tactics, techniques, and

procedures. Although the country may accrue secondary benefits from receiving training
from the United States, the primary purpose for providing the training under this provision is
to improve the coalition forces’ ability to operate with U.S. forces in Afghanistan and Iraq.
 Supplies: Expendable items to be permanently transferred to coalition forces for effective

and safe military operations in Afghanistan and to counter ISIL. Examples are small arms
ammunition, personal equipment, or other consumable or disposable items.
 Specialized Equipment: Equipment loaned to coalition forces to ensure effective and safe
military operations in Afghanistan and to counter ISIL. Equipment in this category includes,
for example, radios, night vision devices, Blue Force Tracker, and Symphony. Maintenance
and sustainment of the equipment are also included in this category.
 Prepare Military Forces for Expeditionary Operations
USEUCOM Funding History ($M):
FY13/
CRSP FY10 FY11 FY12 FY15 FY16 FY17
14
Requested $38.10 $8.00 $71.60 $35.29 $25.77 $13.54 $11.06
Allocated $39.00 $9.00 $71.60 $35.29 $25.77 $13.54 TBD
Used $39.00 $8.40 $71.60 $24.73 $18.44 $0.00 TBD
Funding by Country ($M): Does not include $2,380,500 MRAP Transportation Case
FY13/ FY 17
Country FY10 FY11 FY12 FY15 FY16
14
Albania $0.00 $0.00 $1.50 $1.63 $0.07 $0.00 $0.00
Bulgaria $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1.50 $1.49 $0.00 $0.27
Croatia $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.93 $0.35 $0.32 $0.04
Czech Republic $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1.30 $1.25 $0.08 $0.06
Estonia $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3.14 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Georgia $39.00 $8.40 $70.10 $12.07 $18.48 $10.34 $10.52
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1.88 $0.89 $0.25 $0.00
Hungary
Latvia $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.75 $0.89 $0.00 $0.00
Lithuania $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1.80 $0.32 $0.12 $0.00
Macedonia $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.26 $0.09 $0.00 $0.00
Montenegro $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.26 $0.00 $0.00
Poland $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3.15 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Romania $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $5.18 $1.23 $0.20 $0.00
Slovakia $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.47 $0.44 $0.19 $0.16
Slovenia $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1.27 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
TOTAL $39.00 $8.40 $71.60 $35.33 $25.76 $11.16 $0.00
25
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Request Procedures for Training:
 The Security Cooperation Organization (SCO), working with the supporting COCOM,
identifies the training necessary to meet the supported COCOM’s standard training
requirements and then develops a proposal based on a country-specific assessment to
include the following:
o The type of training needed for the operation and the justification for the training;
o The estimated dates of deployment and numbers of forces who will deploy;
o The location, duration, and proposed dates of training;
o The estimated cost of training per person, including itemized charges for course
materials, instructors, logistical support, and other costs as appropriate, including
transportation to and from the training location;
o The numbers of forces who require training; and
o The certification that the forces would not be able to support the U.S. military
operations in Afghanistan and Iraq but for the provision of training.
 The SCO asks the Ministry of Defense to formally request the specialized training by
sending official correspondence to the supporting COCOM committing forces to an
upcoming deployment to support U.S. military operations in Afghanistan and/or Iraq. The
letter should include the inclusive dates of deployment, the numbers of forces deploying, the
mission the forces will conduct to support U.S. military operation in Afghanistan and/or Iraq,
and the specialized training requirement(s). The letter should also include a promise to
repay the costs of training should the forces not deploy after the training has been provided.
 Upon receipt of the request for specialized training, the SCO endorses the request as
necessary for successful and safe operations with the U.S. Armed Forces in the military
operation. The SCO verifies program feasibility with DSCA and confirms pricing with the
relevant Military Department security assistance office. The supporting COCOM provides a
further endorsement verifying the training is required for deployment. The Ministry of
Defense official request and endorsements are sent to the OUSD (Policy),
OUSD (Comptroller), DSCA, and the supported COCOM.
 The supported COCOM validates the coalition nation is supporting the U.S. military
operation in Afghanistan and/or Iraq, and that specialized training is required for effective
and safe military operations. If the coalition nation is deploying as part of ISAF, the
supported COCOM (or his/her designee) verifies the support provided by the coalition forces
to the U.S. military operation in Afghanistan. The supported COCOM forwards the
documentation to the OUSD (Comptroller) and OUSD (Policy) with a copy to DSCA.
 The OUSD (Comptroller) and OUSD (Policy) review the request to ensure requirements are
consistent with the guidelines and the military objectives of the U.S. military operations in
Afghanistan and that the request includes sufficient justification to enable development of
the Secretary of Defense approval that the support provided by the coalition forces is in
connection with U.S. military operations in Afghanistan and/or Iraq, and that the provision of
26
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
specialized training, supplies, or specialized equipment is required for effective military

operations. After the evaluation of the documentation, the DSCA will develop the approval
package and forward to the OUSD (Comptroller) for coordination and signature by the
Secretary of Defense.
 Upon approval by the Secretary of Defense and after completion of the 15-day
congressional notification period, the OUSD (Comptroller) will release funds to the DSCA to
enable implementation of the Pseudo Case(s).
Request Procedures for Supplies and Equipment:
 The supported COCOM develops a set of supplies and interoperable specialized equipment
for eligible coalition forces based on missions to be performed in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Include in the supplies and specialized equipment set estimated costs for each item,
quantity required, and coalition forces to which supplies are to be issued and specialized
equipment is expected to be initially issued. In addition, the supported COCOM will also
develop the methods and mechanisms whereby the supplies and equipment will be stored,
issued, maintained, and inventoried upon return to the pool.
 The supported COCOM provides the OUSD (Policy), the OUSD (Comptroller), and DSCA the
proposed equipment and supply requirements for prioritization, consideration of availability
through DoD’s procurement processes, and identification of funding. The supported COCOM
validates that CRSP is the best source to finance the purchase of supplies or equipment.
 Once the equipment and supply requirements are set, the OUSD (Comptroller) requests the
DSCA to begin to develop the pseudo case to enable procurement of the equipment and
supplies in time to meet the deployment schedules.
EUCOM Point of Contact:
POC Email Address

LTC John-Michael Insetta, ECJ5-SCP
john.m.insetta.mil@mail.mil
DSN 430-6834
27
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CSF – Coalition Support Fund

Description:
Allows the Department of Defense to reimburse Pakistan, Jordan, and key cooperating nations for
logistical, military, and other expenses incurred in supporting U.S. military operations.
Legal Basis: Section 1233 of NDAA FY08, as amended
SEC. 1233. REIMBURSEMENT OF CERTAIN COALITION NATIONS FOR SUPPORT

PROVIDED TO UNITED STATES MILITARY OPERATIONS.
(a) AUTHORITY.--From funds made available for the Department of Defense for the current
fiscal year for overseas contingency operations for operation and maintenance, Defense-wide
activities, the Secretary of Defense may reimburse any key cooperating nation for the following:
(1) Logistical and military support provided by that nation to or in connection with United
States military operations in Iraq or in Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan.
(2) Logistical, military, and other support, including access, provided by that nation to or
in connection with United States military operations described in paragraph (1).
(b) OTHER SUPPORT.—Using funds described in subsection (a)(2), the Secretary of Defense
may also assist any key cooperating nation supporting United States military operations in
Afghanistan through the following:
(1) The provision of specialized training to personnel of that nation in connection with
such operations, including training of such personnel before deployment in connection
with such operations.
(2) The procurement and provision of supplies to that nation in connection with such
operations.
(3) The procurement of specialized equipment and the loaning of such specialized
equipment to that nation on a non-reimbursable basis in connection with such
operations.
(c) AMOUNTS OF REIMBURSEMENT.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Reimbursement authorized by subsection (a) may be made in such
amounts as the Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State
and in consultation with the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, may
determine, based on documentation determined by the Secretary of Defense to
adequately account for the support provided.
(2) SUPPORT.—Support authorized by subsection (b) may be provided in such amounts
as the Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State and in
consultation with the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, considers
appropriate.
(d) LIMITATIONS.--
(1) Limitation on amount.--The aggregate amount of reimbursements made under

subsection (a) and support provided under subsection (b) during fiscal year 2015 may not
exceed $1,200,000,000. Of the aggregate amount specified in the preceding sentence, the
28
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
total amount of reimbursements made under subsection (a) and support provided under
subsection (b) to Pakistan during fiscal year 2015 may not exceed $1,000,000,000.
(2) Prohibition on contractual obligations to make payments.--The Secretary of Defense may
not enter into any contractual obligation to make a reimbursement under the authority in
subsection (a).
(3) Prohibition on reimbursement of Pakistan for support during periods closed to
transshipment.--Effective as of the date of the enactment of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013, funds (including funds from a prior fiscal year that
remain available for obligation) may not be used for reimbursements under the authority in
subsection (a) for Pakistan for claims of support provided during any period when the ground
lines of supply through Pakistan to Afghanistan were closed to the transshipment of
equipment and supplies in support of United States military operations in Afghanistan.
(d) NOTICE TO CONGRESS.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), the Secretary of Defense shall
notify the appropriate congressional committees not later than 15 days before making any
reimbursement under the authority in subsection (a) or providing any support under the
authority in subsection (b). In the case of any reimbursement to Pakistan under the authority
of this section, such notice shall be made in accordance with the notice requirements under
section 1232(b).
(2) EXCEPTION.—The requirement to provide notice under paragraph (1) shall not apply
with respect to a reimbursement for access based on an international agreement.
(e) QUARTERLY REPORTS.—The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate
congressional committees on a quarterly basis a report on any reimbursements made under the
authority in subsection (a), and any support provided under the authority in subsection (b),
during such quarter.
(f) DEFINITION.— in this section, the term ‘appropriate congressional committees’ means—
(1) The Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the
Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives; and
(2) The Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, and the
Committee on Appropriations of the Senate.
Source: Section 1233 of the NDAA for FY08 (P.L. 110-181), as amended by Section 1223
on the NDAA for FY10 (P.L. 111-84), Section 1213 of the NDAA for FY11 (P.L. 111-383),
Section 1213 of the NDAA for FY12 (P.L. 112-81), Section 1227 of the NDAA for FY13 (P.L.
112-239), Section 1213 of the NDAA for FY14 (P.L. 113-66), Section 1222 of the NDAA for
FY15 (P.L. 113-291), and Section 1212 of the NDAA for FY16 (P.L. 114-92).
29
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Funding by Country: All values are in millions of dollars

Croatia $5.271 $2.048 $4.695 $4.922 $3.474 $0.000 $0.000
Hungary $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.229* $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Romania $0.000 $0.000 $0.012 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
TOTAL $5.271 $2.048 $4.707 $5.151 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
POC Email Address
LTC John-Michael Insetta, ECJ5-SCP, 430-6834 john.m.insetta.mil@mail.mil
30
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CTFP – Combating Terrorism Fellowship Program

Description:
Created in 2002, the Combating Terrorism Fellowship Program (CTFP) was established to meet an
emergent and urgent defense requirement to build partnerships through targeted, non-lethal,
Combating Terrorism (CbT) education and training. CTFP directly supports Department of Defense
(DoD) and national goals by providing CbT education and training for mid/senior-level international
military officers, selected senior Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs), ministry of defense civilians,
and security officials whose current or future responsibilities involve combating terrorism. CTFP is a
permanent $25-$35 million (value) authority, funded annually through DoD’s O&M funding, managed
by DSCA, with oversight by Office of the Assistance Secretary of Defense for Special Operations
Low-Intensity Conflict (ASD (SO/LIC)).
Fiscal Year 2017 CTFP Objectives:
• Continue the coordinated development of curriculum to address efforts, threats, and

issues in the conduct of the transnational security studies programs to broaden our
CTFP alumnus’ global reach and networking opportunities.
• Conduct one training and education event that focuses on the development of
strategies, legal frameworks, counter-narratives, and action plans to deal with foreign
terrorist fighters that immigrate or return to partner nations from conflict zones.
• Conduct one training and education event that focuses strategies and action plans to
prevent violent extremism organization’s us of the mass migrations and human
trafficking to infiltrate terrorist into partner nation societies.
• Integrate, to the extent possible, CTFP operations with other security cooperation
programs or initiatives.
Education and training will be a mixture of existing, traditional classroom and mobile
programs, and other innovative activities designed to strengthen individual, country, and regional CbT
capabilities and capacities.
CTFP may provide education and training to foreign military officers, ministry of defense
officials, and foreign security officials. Education and training may be provided at U.S. military
education institutions, regional centers, conferences, seminars, or in conjunction with other education
and training programs. As a prerequisite for CTFP funding, an education or training activity must
provide unique CbT education or training as identified by the respective Combatant Command and
approved by the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low-Intensity Conflict
(ASD (SO/LIC)), in coordination with the appropriate regional offices.
CTFP may pay for all cost associated with such education and training, including, but not
limited to, transportation, travel, and subsistence, related orientation programs (such as English
language training), course-curriculum development, program management, and the incremental cost
of U.S. military personnel and civilian officials whose participation directly contributes to the education
and training of the foreign participants. Contractors and temporary-hire employees may be used to
administer or otherwise implement the CTFP if approved by ASD SO/LIC on a case-by-case basis.
CTFP funds may only be expended for that portion of the contractor or employee’s time that is
31
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
actually dedicated to CTFP. Temporary-hire employees may be used only if ASD SO/LIC is satisfied
that hiring is preferred over contracting. CTFP may not pay for training and education relating to
tactical operations.
Responsibilities:
ASD (SO/LIC) is the senior Policy official for the CTFP and provides guidance to the Director,
DSCA on administration and financial execution and exercises policy oversight through the Deputy
Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Combating Terrorism (DASD (SO&CT)).
DASD (SO&CT) determines program goals and objectives; establishes priorities, in coordination with
the appropriate regional offices; and coordinates the integration of the CTFP into the theater security
cooperation efforts of the combatant commands. DASD (SO&CT), in coordination with DSCA, will
establish administrative procedures for CTFP, which will be issued under separate cover.
DASD (SO&CT) ensures that the program activities meet the intent of existing law and DoD
policy and fulfill the goals of the program. DASD (SO&CT) approves the annual education and
training plan and any modifications to the plan as they occur. Additionally, DASD (SO&CT), in
conjunction with the Combatant Commands and appropriate OSD regional offices, develops CTFP
strategic engagement plans that support the Guidance for Employment of the Force (GEF) and
existing Combatant Command Theater Campaign Plans.
ASD (SO/LIC) provides annual program, budget guidance and approval for the CTFP annual
report to Congress which is required by statute.
Legal Basis: 10 USC §2249c
CTFP became permanent legislation in the National Defense Authorization Act for FY04,
Public Law 108-136, 24 November 2003, as amended most recently in 2013. These revisions
and amendments are the law in effect as of 11 October 2016.
§ 2249c. Regional Defense Combating Terrorism Fellowship Program: authority to use

appropriated funds for costs associated with education and training of foreign officials (a)
Authority To Use Funds.—Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, funds
appropriated to the Department of Defense may be used to pay any costs associated with the
education and training of foreign military officers, ministry of defense officials, or security officials at
United States military or civilian educational institutions, regional centers, conferences, seminars, or
other training programs conducted under the Regional Defense Combating Terrorism Fellowship
Program. Costs for which payment may be made under this section include the costs of
transportation and travel and subsistence costs.
(b) Limitation. —The total amount of funds used under the authority in subsection (a) in any fiscal
year may not exceed $35,000,000. Amounts available under the authority in subsection (a) for a
fiscal year may be used for programs that being in such fiscal year but end in the next fiscal year.
(c) Annual Report. —Not later than December 1 of each year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit
to Congress a report on the administration of this section during the fiscal year ended in such year.
The report shall include the following matters:
(1) A complete accounting of the expenditure of appropriated funds for purposes authorized under
subsection (a), including—
(A) the countries of the foreign officers and officials for whom costs were paid; and
(B) for each such country, the total amount of the costs paid.
(2) The training courses attended by the foreign officers and officials, including a specification of
which, if any, courses were conducted in foreign countries.
32
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
(3) An assessment of the effectiveness of the program referred to in subsection (a), including
engagement activities for program alumni, in increasing the cooperation of the governments of
foreign countries with the United States in the global war on terrorism.
(4) A discussion of any actions being taken to improve the program, including a list of any unfunded
or unmet training requirements and requests.
(5) A discussion and justification of how the program fits within the theater security priorities of each
of the commanders of the geographic combatant commands.
.
Request Procedures:
Procedures and timeline: SOCEUR normally receives the CCMD allocation from DSCA several
months prior to the fiscal year. The allocations are prioritized by GEF and country team
requirements through SOCEUR CTFP PM in line with the EUCOM-SOCEUR CT/CTFP CbT
Engagement Priority Country list to determine which countries should receive direct allocations
under USEUCOM area of responsibility emerging and urgent request. The CCMD
recommendation is returned to the Defense Security Cooperation Agency/Combating Terrorism
Fellowship Program (DSCA/CTFP) management for staffing and allocation
process. Recommendations are then sent to the Deputy Assistance Secretary of Defense/Special
Operation Combating Terrorism (DASD/SOCT) for final approval. Normally the CCMD receives its
allocation notice prior to the Security Cooperation Education and Training Working Group
(SCETWG).
While CTFP allocates a certain amount to the CCMDs, $7M is held at DASD/SOCT for invitational
schools. These slots are given to countries after the budget process is finished and their cost are
included in the overall EUCOM-SOCEUR CTFP expenses at the end of each year, leading to
"Funds Used" to exceed "Funds Allocated" in each fiscal year.
SOCEUR Point of Contact:
POC Email Address

This position is currently vacant and is being filled.
Line FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17

Requested $2.000 $2.000 $2.500 $2.500 $2.500 $2.500 $2.500 $2.500
Allocated $1.500 $1.200 $1.200 $1.075 $1.050 $1.050 $1.050 $1.050
Used $4.400 $3.200 $2.900 $4.653 $3.762 $3.178 $0.000 $0.000
Country FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17

Albania $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.131 $0.327 $0.300 $0.500 $0.000
Armenia $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.003 $0.022 $0.023 $0.000 $0.000
Azerbaijan $0.200 $0.150 $0.150 $0.063 $0.253 $0.105 $0.300 $0.000
Bosnia-Herzegovina $0.050 $0.075 $0.075 $0.080 $0.099 $0.150 $0.130 $0.000
Bulgaria $0.000 $0.075 $0.075 $0.429 $0.621 $0.600 $0.100 $0.000
Croatia $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.085 $0.043 $0.046 $0.002 $0.000
Cyprus $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.005 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Czech Republic $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.091 $0.040 $0.035 $0.004 $0.000
Estonia $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.235 $0.091 $0.030 $0.004 $0.000
33
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
France $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.009 $0.000 $0.000

Georgia $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.245 $0.358 $0.225 $0.230 $0.000
Germany $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.015 $0.000 $0.000
Greece $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.085 $0.120 $0.100 $0.020 $0.000
Hungary $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.784 $0.183 $0.090 $0.027 $0.000
Iceland $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.003 $0.000 $0.000
Ireland $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.003 $0.000 $0.000
Italy $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.013 $0.033 $0.012 $0.000 $0.000
Kosovo $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.059 $0.081 $0.058 $0.035 $0.000
Latvia $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.088 $0.075 $0.028 $0.004 $0.000
Lithuania $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.027 $0.028 $0.003 $0.000 $0.000
Malta $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.007 $0.033 $0.016 $0.000
Moldova $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.124 $0.018 $0.060 $0.002 $0.000
Montenegro $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.087 $0.070 $0.022 $0.022 $0.000
Norway $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.006 $0.000 $0.000
Palestine Authority $0.200 $0.100 $0.100 $0.045 $0.117 $0.100 $0.187 $0.000
Poland $0.000 $0.100 $0.100 $0.085 $0.020 $0.101 $0.225 $0.000
Portugal $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.011 $0.002 $0.004 $0.000
Republic of
$0.050 $0.075 $0.075 $0.090 $0.112 $0.068 $0.107 $0.000
Macedonia
Romania $0.000 $0.075 $0.075 $0.328 $0.074 $0.068 $0.225 $0.000
Republic of Serbia $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.274 $0.065 $0.038 $0.022 $0.000
Slovak Republic $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.020 $0.000 $0.003 $0.000 $0.000
Slovenia $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.137 $0.112 $0.013 $0.004 $0.000
Spain $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.008 $0.007 $0.005 $0.016 $0.000
Sweden $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.015 $0.000 $0.003 $0.000 $0.000
Switzerland $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.006 $0.000 $0.000
Turkey $0.200 $0.150 $0.150 $0.900 $0.758 $0.800 $0.600 $0.000
Ukraine $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.122 $0.012 $0.015 $0.026 $0.000
CCMD Engagements $3.700 $2.400 $2.100 $1.650 $0.500 $0.450 $0.400 $0.400
TOTAL $4.400 $3.200 $2.900 $4.653 $3.762 $3.178 $3.212 $0.400
34
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
DCCEP – Developing Countries Combined Exercise Program

Description:
Developing Countries Combined Exercise Program (DCCEP) funding is used to defray

expenses a developing country encounters while participating in a U.S. exercise. This program
is authorized under Title 10 USC Section 2010 (DCCEP). CJCSM 3511.01, 26 May 15,
APPENDIX E TO ENCLOSURE B provides detailed criteria for use. As a general rule, the
greatest opportunity to fund eligible nations for their incremental costs incurred in participating
with U.S. forces exercises is through DCCEP. The authority to spend U.S. funds must be
approved by OSD and DOS. DCCEP requirements are submitted as part of the POM cycle in
order to provide as much advance notice as possible and have a Concept Funding Request
(CFR) in EUCOM’s TSC Event Management System.
The purposes of Title 10 U.S.C. section 2010 is for the benefit of training U.S. forces and is not
authority to train foreign forces, except for limited familiarization and safety instruction before
combined-forces engagement activities are undertaken. It is acknowledged that there is a
training aspect inherent in exercises in which foreign forces participate with the United States.
Notwithstanding this training aspect, care shall be taken to ensure that exercises, funded under
the authority of Title 10 U.S.C. section 2010 authority are not described or conducted for the
purpose of training for foreign forces or building partner nation capacity, which falls outside
DCCEP authority. Terms such as familiarization, mutual understanding, interoperability,
information sharing, military-to-military contacts, and enhanced understanding of U.S. tactics,
techniques and procedures (TTPs) are illustrative of appropriate descriptive terms that may be
used to describe DCCEP engagement activities.
Participating countries must be “developing” as defined by at least two of the three following
organizations: the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and the United Nations. The
Joint Staff J-7 evaluates the reports of these organizations and provides an annual list of the
countries considered “developing”. An exception to fund a developed country, with significant
justification, may be submitted to OSD through the Joint Staff. Other required criteria are:
 Exercises must enhance U.S. security interests

 U.S. exercise objectives require participation by the countries named for funding in the
exercise
 Subject countries will be unable to pay for required support without U.S. payment of
incremental expenses
EUCOM‘s DCCEP funding is provided by the Army as EUCOM‘s executive agent. DCCEP
pays for developing countries’ incremental expenses directly resulting from its participation in an
approved exercise with the U.S. Reasonable and proper cost of goods and services used by a
developing country as a direct result of that country‘s participation include:
 Fuel
 Ammunition
 Transportation and associated services at planning conferences and the exercise locations
 Travel to and from the planning conference and exercise locations
 Interpreters
 Life Support (lodging, meals, rations, and sanitation)
35
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
DCCEP is not permitted to pay for U.S. personnel pay and allowances. DCCEP is also not
permitted to pay for host nation‘s participating forces personnel pay and allowances or
incidental expenses.
This program is not intended to fund the entirety of multinational or bilateral engagements.
USEUCOM depends on funding approval from OSD and funding support from Department of
the Army to maintain the exercise program and keep pace with the CDR's desire to fulfill
engagement goals in the Strategy and Theater Campaign Plan.
Responsibilities:
EUCOM ECJ7/JTrEx
 Program Management
 Coordination with components, EUCOM staff, Joint Staff, and OSD
 Report CCMD spending to Joint Staff and other authorities as required
Office Conducting the Exercise (OCE)

 Develop, author, and submit requirements to Program Manager. Includes annual
requirements and quarterly Out of Cycle requirements
 Request funds for obligation in Concept Funding Request (CFR)
 Plan and execute exercises and associated Joint Exercise Life Cycle and Title X events
 Assure that funds are obligated for only authorized purposes and by the countries authorized
in the approval
 Account for and report spending to Program Manager (PM)
ECCM
 Disburse and transfer of funds to the OCE or U.S. Embassy as directed by the PM
 Maintenance of the financial obligation records
ECJA
 Review requirements against legal authority and provide legal guidance as needed
Other EUCOM staff to include J5 provides coordination and subject matter expertise relating to
the program.
Legal Basis:
United States Code TITLE 10 - ARMED FORCES Subtitle A - General Military Law PART III -
TRAINING AND EDUCATION CHAPTER 101 - TRAINING GENERALLY Sec. 2010.
 The Secretary of Defense, after consultation with the Secretary of State, may pay the
incremental expenses of a developing country that are incurred by that country as the direct
result of participation in a bilateral or multilateral military exercise if:
(1) The exercise is undertaken primarily to enhance the security interests of the United
States; and
(2) The Secretary of Defense determines that the participation by such country is necessary
to the achievement of the fundamental objectives of the exercise and that those objectives
cannot be achieved unless the United States provides the incremental expenses incurred by
such country.
 The Secretary of Defense shall establish by regulation such accounting procedures as may
be necessary to ensure that funds expended under this section are properly expended.
36
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
 Funds available to carry out this section shall be available, to the extent provided in
Appropriations Acts, for bilateral or multilateral military exercises that begin in a fiscal year
and end in the following fiscal year.
 In this section, the term “incremental expenses” means the reasonable and proper cost of
the goods and services that are consumed by a developing country as a direct result of that
country’s participation in a bilateral or multilateral military exercise with the United States,
including rations, fuel, training ammunition, lodging, life support and transportation. Such
term does not include pay, allowances, incidental expenses and other normal costs of such
country’s personnel.
Regulation:
CJCSM 3511.01, Appendix E to Enclosure B, Joint Training Resources for the Armed Forces of
the United States, 26 May 2015
Lines of Activity supported include:

 SOF Operations, Actions and Activities (OAAs)
 Maritime Operations Capacity and Capability
 Information Assurance/Cyber Defense
 Disaster Management Capability
 Military Medical Capabilities
 Prepare Military forces for Expeditionary Ops
 Operational Logistics Capability
 U.S. Defense Posture
 Regional Partnering and Collaboration
 Combined Land Forces Capability/Interop/Deployable
USEUCOM Funding History: All values are in millions of dollars, includes base and OCO dollars.
DCCEP PE FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17

Requested $2.900 $2.700 $23.200 $12.700 $6.653 $8.025 $27.799 $32.364
Allocated $2.124 $1.800 $3.800 $2.700 $3.020 $2.164 $2.664 $2.634
Used $2.124 $2.904 $2.818 $2.093 $3.020 $1.457 $2.198 TBD
DCCEP Eligible Countries: Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bosnia, Bulgaria, Georgia, Kosovo,
Macedonia, Moldova, Montenegro, Romania, Serbia, Turkey, and Ukraine.
Request Procedures:
HQ USEUCOM submits an annual plan to OSD via the Joint Staff o/a 01 APR for authorization to
fund specific exercises. Components (OCE) provide their requests o/a 01 Mar to the ECJ7/JTrEx in
the format required by OSD as administered by the Joint Staff.
Each request is for a specific exercise and provides a detailed description of each exercise for which
funding authority is requested as follows (detailed instructions will be provided with the 2010 request
for authority form):
 Name of exercise
 Service Components
 Location(s)
 Exercise type, multinational or bilateral, frequency, main purpose, scenario
37
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
 Dates
 Partner nations (PN) to receive assistance
 PN numbers and roles
 Assistance summary by county - include a description of spending and purpose (see categories
above)
 Critical need date – when EUCOM or OCE needs to know if authority is granted
 DCCEP POC: ECJ7/JTrEx Program Manager
 U.S. security interests
 U.S. readiness
 PN response if DCCEP authority not granted
 Impact on U.S. if DCCEP authority not granted
 Legal Review (ECJA)
 GCC approval (ECJ7/JTrEx)
The Department of the Army, as the EUCOM Combatant Command Executive Agent, funds DCCEP
each fiscal year based on the 5-year POM submission and justification for the exercises. Funding
level is determined by the priority of DCCEP against other EUCOM requirements and the importance
of the exercise. EUCOM has the flexibility to expend DCCEP funds (increase or decrease) on any
approved exercise in the plan though only on those partner nations financially eligible.
Quarterly out-of-cycle requests are used to capture emergent requirements. The following conditions
are criteria for an out-of-cycle submission and therefore require approval through the same process
as the annually-scheduled requests:
 New exercises
 Adding countries to approved exercises
 Change in exercise objectives
 Change in exercise location
 Change in exercise dates across fiscal year
 Exceeding approved amount
GCCs must submit their quarterly out of cycle proposals to the Joint Staff 60-days prior to the
beginning of the quarter. Components must submit their requirements to ECJ7 30-days prior to the
Joint Staff suspense for legal review and processing.
 FY Q1 (1 Nov – 31 Dec): due to ECJ7 on 1Jul; due to JS/J7 on 1 Aug
 FY Q2 (1 Jan – 31 Mar): due to ECJ7 on 1 Oct; due to JS/J7 on 1 Nov
 FY Q3 (1 Apr – 30 Jun): due to ECJ7 on 1 Jan; due to JS/J7 on 1 Feb
 FY Q4 (1 Jul – 30 Sep): due to ECJ7 on 1 Apr; due to JS/J7 on 1 May
Should requirements exceed funding, allocation will be determined in coordination with ECJ5/8 and
the OCE.
 Funds are typically distributed directly via GFEBS or Military Interdepartmental Purchase
Request (MIPR) to the Components, Funding memo to the Embassy ODCs and when required
MIPR to organizations for contract services or ammunition expenses.
 EUCOM may be requested to submit an annual report to the Joint Staff each December to detail
funds expended by country. This report is further submitted to Congress.
 The following chart documents the DCCEP approval process in a diagram showing the flow of
the request from EUCOM to the Joint Staff, OSD, and the State Department.
38
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
USEUCOM Program Manager

POC Email Address
LtCol Matt Sale
Matthew.r.sale.mil@mail.mil
ECJ7 JTrEx, DSN 430-4161 and
michael.j.burke24.ctr@mail.mil
Mr. Michael Burke 430-7048
39
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
DEIC – Defense Environmental International Cooperation

Description:
The Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Installations and Environment)
(ODUSD(I&E)), in partnership with OUSD(Policy) and regional Combatant Commanders, engages
in military-to-military cooperation with the Ministries of Defense to further the security cooperation
and National Security goals of the United States.
Environmental international cooperation activities and partnering efforts help maintain access to
resources, including air, land, and sea, for training and readiness; minimize encroachment;
contribute to interoperability; and foster a global military environmental ethic. The United States
partners with foreign militaries to better understand how to evaluate, prioritize, and more effectively
meet military environmental, safety and occupational health (ESOH) needs to promote force health
protection, reduce US liability, and comply with international environmental treaty obligations
overseas. The Department of Defense’s (DoD’s) environmental activities also assist militaries in
newly democratic states with adjusting to concepts such as civilian oversight, public accountability,
openness, and cooperation with civilian agencies.
Defense Environmental International Cooperation Supports DoD’s Mission
Defense Environmental International Cooperation (DEIC) supports U.S. national security and
military strategies, as well as foreign and Defense policy goals. Through military-to-military
cooperation, DoD seeks to:
- strengthen defense relationships that promote specific US security;

- enhance allied and friendly military capabilities for self-defense and coalition operations;
- provide US forces with peacetime and contingency access and enroute infrastructure; and
- foster regional stability, democratization, and strong alliances.
DEIC activities encourage militaries to discuss regional environmental issues in a neutral forum that
helps build trust among participants. These information exchanges also demonstrate that DoD is a
trusted ally, a responsible force, and is committed to protecting the environmental resources
entrusted to the Department by overseas host nations. These efforts help maintain international
access to air, land, and sea resources necessary for basing, training, and operations.
Examples of DEIC engagements include:
 EU environmental legislation impacts  Oil spill preparedness

 NATO Environmental Protection  Water resource management
requirements  Integrated camp management
 Field water generation  Climate change resiliency and adaptation
 Hazardous material storage and handling  Improving base sustainability
 Environmental considerations in military  Training area management
operations
40
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Summary
DoD’s Defense Environmental International Cooperation (DEIC) activities support U.S. and DoD
policy objectives and provide tools for OSD and theater security cooperation activities which are
non-threatening and relatively low-cost. The DoD is responding to the stated needs and
cooperation opportunities of foreign militaries who recognize the importance of environmental
stewardship in conducting their activities. DoD helps build trust, openness, and a global
environmental ethic among its partners through the DEIC Program.
Legal Basis:
DEIC is funded through Title 10, O&M (Defense-Wide) funds through the Office of the Secretary of
Defense and is therefore subject to all restrictions and limitations under that appropriation. It
cannot be used for travel for non-U.S. participants (generally), official representation funds,
equipment purchases, construction, or renovations. DEIC is typically used to fund workshops,
seminars, table top exercises, guidebooks, information exchanges, or participation in multinational
studies.
Lines of Activity Supported
 Environmental Security
DEIC FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16

Requested $0.370 $0.250 $0.749 $0.584 $0.822 $0.675 $0.339
Allocated $0.135 $0.215 $0.537 $0.329 $0.291 $0.239 $0.218
Used* $0.135 $0.215 $0.537 $0.323 $0.291 $0.239 $0.216
*Current as of Oct 16

Azerbaijan $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.010 $0.013 $0.000 $0.000
Albania $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.015 $0.000 $0.000
Bulgaria $0.030 $0.000 $0.000 $0.042 $0.016 $0.000 $0.010
Croatia $0.020 $0.000 $0.000 $0.046 $0.036 $0.000 $0.011
Greece $0.010 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Estonia $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.010 $0.010
Finland $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.008
Israel $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.020 $0.040 $0.018
Italy $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.034 $0.034
Kosovo $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.032 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Latvia $0.020 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.013 $0.020 $0.010
Lithuania $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.010 $0.010
Moldova $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
41
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED

Montenegro $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.013 $0.000 $0.011
Region/Arctic $0.040 $0.000 $0.350 $0.140 $0.135 $0.125 $0.065
Region/Europe $0.000 $0.000 $0.115 $0.053 $0.030 $0.000 $0.000
Serbia $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.010
Slovakia $0.030 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Sweden $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.009
Theater $0.015 $0.215 $0.072 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.010
TOTAL $0.135 $0.215 $0.537 $0.323 $0.291 $0.239 $0.216
Request Procedures:
The following is representative of the annual call for proposals.
1) Mar: Calling notice published by ODUSD (I&E). The calling notice will provide submission
requirements but generally includes the following information:
a) title
b) organization originating request, including government action officer, e-mail address, and
phone number
c) proposal description of who, what, where, when, how, and why (including how the
proposal supports the GEF, Combatant Command’s Theater Security Cooperation Plan,
and other strategic guidance)
d) deliverables (e.g. handbook, exercise, workshop, proceedings, tool development) and
exportability of the product (within the region, to other countries, etc.)
e) planned schedule for execution (including planning meetings, events and deliverables)
f) resource requirements:
 amount of DEIC funding requested and a detailed spreadsheet breakdown showing
how funds will be spent (e.g., travel, publication costs, contractor support);
 cost estimate of the entire proposal (not just the DEIC amount), identifying other
resource sources that will be required (e.g., TCA, Warsaw Initiative Funds, IMET,
CTR, personnel, technology, etc.)
2) May: EUCOM internal suspense to review and prioritize project submissions
3) Jul: Project proposals submitted for review and comment by ODUSD(I&E) and ODASD
(Policy/Strategy)
4) Aug: DEIC Advisory Group convenes to review and prioritize proposals. The Advisory Group
is comprised of three voting representatives: OUSD (ATL/DUSD(IE)-ERS), ODASD
(Policy/Strategy), and the Office of the Chairman of the Joint Staff. Representatives from
each geographic combatant command will also be present to discuss and defend proposals.
5) Sep: Approved and funded project list released by Advisory Group for next fiscal year
execution
POC Email Address

Ms. Abigail Goss ECJ4-DDSL
abigail.d.goss.civ@mail.mil
DSN 430-6181
42
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
DHAPP – DoD HIV/AIDS Prevention Program

Description:
In 1999 the United States joined the International Partnership Against HIV/AIDS in Africa (IPAA) to
mitigate the HIV pandemic and stop the spread of the AIDS virus. The African continent is the area of
the world hardest hit by the HIV/AIDS epidemic, and many militaries are experiencing readiness
problems due to high rates of morbidity and mortality among their personnel.
DHAPP’s mission is to reduce the incidence of HIV/AIDS among uniformed personnel in selected
African nations and beyond. DHAPP assists in developing and implementing military-specific HIV
prevention programs and integrate with other US government, nongovernmental organizations, and
United Nations programs.
As Executive Agent, the DHAPP Management Office at the Naval Health Research Center (NHRC)
provides day-to-day direction of the DOD effort. They provide technical assistance for the countries,
prepare and deliver periodic reports and provide the results of assessments to the appropriate
Deputy Assistant of Secretary Defense (DASD).
Legal Basis:
P.L. 108-25, 117 Stat. 711, 27 May 2003

 Prepare Military Forces for Peacekeeping Missions
DHAPP FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17

Requested $0.454 $0.602 $0.565 $0.615 $0.605 $0.605 TBD
Allocated $0.454 $0.602 $0.262 $0.615 $0.605 $0.605 TBD
Used $0.454 $0.602 $0.262 $0.615 $0.605 $0.605 TBD

Estonia $0.200 $0.272 $0.050 $0.200 $0.200 $0.200
Georgia $0.154 $0.163 $0.150 $0.010 $0.000 $0.000
Moldova $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.040 $0.040 $0.040
Serbia $0.100 $0.127 $0.125 $0.125 $0.125 $0.125
Theater $0.000 $0.040 $0.040 $0.040 $0.040 $0.040
Ukraine $0.000 $0.000 $0.200 $0.200 $0.200 $0.200
TOTAL $0.454 $0.602 $0.565 $0.615 $0.605 $0.605
43
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Request Procedures:
DHAPP receives funding from Congressional plus Ups to the Defense Health Program. Since 2001
there has been legislation for DHAPP funding. However, in the past several years due to the GWOT
there has been no certainty for funding and in several cases have been impacted by the
Congressional Resolution. The funding amount has typically been aligned with the Title VI Other
Department of Defense Program / Defense Health Program within the DOD Quality of Life Bill.
There is no guarantee that DHAPP will receive funding from year to year and the amounts vary each
year based on what Congress and Senate approve. Once an amount is approved the funding is
received from the Dept. of Treasury via OSD Health Affairs, Bureau of Medicine to Naval Health
Research Center/DHAPP. DHAPP will then MIPR funding to the country team (Embassy), or the
Navy Contracting Officer in Naples to write the contracts.
FY 06 DHP Bill language for DHAPP states: Provided, That notwithstanding any other provision of
law, of the amount made available under this heading for research, development, test and evaluation,
not less than $5,300,000 shall be available for HIV prevention educational activities undertaken in
connection with U.S. military training, exercises, and humanitarian assistance activities conducted
primarily in African nations.
DHAPP allocates funding to countries in each of the CCMD’s AOR based on proposals received
from a country. The proposals are received from CCMD, Universities, NGO’s, host nation’s military
and should be vetted through the country team (DATT/ODC). These proposals are reviewed and
given a merit score based on their technical merit for accomplishing HIV/AIDS prevention. The
proposal review panel membership consists of members from DHAPP, CCMD’s, and other experts
from the military medical community. DHAPP then presents the collective review results from the
proposal review committee to the DOD Board of Directors (OSD, OSD Health Affairs, CCMD rep’s,
PEPFAR) for their decision on the amount of funding a country will receive.
Detailed proposal process can be found at: http://www.nhrc.navy.mil/programs/dhapp/proposals.html
POC Email Address

Lt Col Roberta Kilroy, ECJ4 Medical Engagements
roberta.a.kilroy.mil@mail.mill
DSN 430-5225
44
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
EITP – Expeditionary Intelligence Training Program

Description:
As a response to MG Michael Flynn's 2010 article, "Fixing Intel," U.S. European Command
(USEUCOM) created the Expeditionary Intelligence Training Program (EITP) to train Intelligence
Professionals enroute to Afghanistan on the specific problems related to conducting intelligence
analysis in support of the International Stability Assistance Force (ISAF). The EITP is hosted at the
NATO School at Oberammergau (NSO). Intelligence support to Counter Insurgency Operations
(COIN) requires intelligence to be bottom-up driven focusing on local atmospherics. As this
information moves up the chain is has to be synthesized with other coalition units. Without a
common understanding and common Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (TTPs), it is impossible
for ISAF Headquarters to use the sum of the results for predictive analysis. In addition to the courses
taught in Oberammergau, this program provides Mobile Training Teams (MTTs), which travel directly
to the host country to train their professionals before deployment. Unlike traditional NSO courses,
EITP courses have no tuition costs. The only expense to the partner nation is travel, lodging, and per
diem expenses for their students.
Legal Basis:
10 U.S.C. § 2350m, as amended - PARTICIPATION IN MULTINATIONAL MILITARY CENTERS

OF EXCELLENCE
(a) Participation Authorized.— The Secretary of Defense may, with the concurrence of the
Secretary of State, authorize the participation of members of the armed forces and Department of
Defense civilian personnel in any multinational military center of excellence for purposes of—
(1) enhancing the ability of military forces and civilian personnel of the nations participating in
such center to engage in joint exercises or coalition or international military operations; or
(2) improving interoperability between the armed forces and the military forces of friendly
foreign nations.
(b) Memorandum of Understanding.—
(1) The participation of members of the armed forces or Department of Defense civilian
personnel in a multinational military center of excellence under subsection (a) shall be in
accordance with the terms of one or more memoranda of understanding entered into by the
Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, and the foreign nation
or nations concerned.
(2) If Department of Defense facilities, equipment, or funds are used to support a
multinational military center of excellence under subsection (a), the memoranda of
understanding under paragraph (1) with respect to that center shall provide details of any
cost-sharing arrangement or other funding arrangement.
(c) Availability of Appropriated Funds.—
(1) Funds appropriated to the Department of Defense for operation and maintenance are
available as follows:
(A) To pay the United States share of the operating expenses of any multinational
military center of excellence in which the United States participates under this section.
(B) To pay the costs of the participation of members of the armed forces and
Department of Defense civilian personnel in multinational military centers of
excellence under this section, including the costs of expenses of such participants.
(2) No funds may be used under this section to fund the pay or salaries of members of the
armed forces and Department of Defense civilian personnel who participate in multinational
military centers of excellence under this section.
45
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
(d) Use of Department of Defense Facilities and Equipment.— Facilities and equipment of the
Department of Defense may be used for purposes of the support of multinational military centers of
excellence under this section that are hosted by the Department.
(e) Annual Reports on Use of Authority.—
(1) Not later than October 31 each year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the
Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the
House of Representatives a report on the use of the authority in this section during the
preceding fiscal year.
(2) Each report required by paragraph (1) shall include, for the fiscal year covered by such
report, the following:
(A) A detailed description of the participation of the Department of Defense, and of
members of the armed forces and civilian personnel of the Department, in
multinational military centers of excellence under the authority of this section.
(f) Multinational Military Center of Excellence Defined. In this section, the term “multinational military
center of excellent” means an entity sponsored by one or more nations that is accredited and
approved by the Military Committee of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) as offering
recognized expertise and experience to personnel participating in the activities of such entity for the
benefit of NATO by providing such personnel opportunities to-
(1) enhance education and training;
(2) improve interoperability and capabilities;
(3) assist in the development of doctrine; and
(4) validate concepts through experimentation.
 Intelligence Security Cooperation
EITP FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17

Requested $2.135 $2.849 $1.160 $1.325 $0.810 $0.367 $0.000 $0.000
Allocated $2.135 $2.849 $1.160 $1.325 $0.810 $0.367 $0.000 $0.000
Used $2.135 $2.849 $1.160 $1.325 $0.803 $0.364 $0.000 $0.000

Theater $2.135 $2.849 $2.050 $1.325 $0.803 $0.364 $0.000
TOTAL $2.135 $2.849 $2.050 $1.325 $0.803 $0.364 $0.000
POC Email Address
Mr. Mike Stuber, ECCM, 430-5986 michael.e.stuber.civ@mail.mil
46
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
ERC – Exercise Related Construction

Description:
ERC is unspecified minor military construction (UMMC) to build or improve semi-permanent facilities
with no permanent U.S. presence that supports Joint Exercise Program (JEP) exercises conducted
OCONUS. Such projects are funded with the military construction appropriation or MILCON. The
program is administered by the Joint Staff J4-Engineer Division (J4/ED) in accordance with CJCSI
4600.02A, Exercise Related Construction (ERC) Program Management, 18 Mar 2011. An update for
this CJCSI is expected in 2016.
The ERC program is specifically designed to support JEP objectives, facilitate resource savings,
support posture planning, build partnership capacity and train military engineers. ERC projects that
serve a dual purpose of supporting both exercises and numbered CONPLANs/OPLANs are given
higher priority in the selection process. JSJ4-ED also considers CCMD financial performance in
placing funding priorities. CCMDs that show quick obligation and execution of funds are given higher
priority for funding their project requirements.
Congress authorizes and appropriates a separate Joint Staff unspecified minor MILCON line item for
ERC. Historical funding levels are $6-8M per year for all of DoD. The funding is directed to the Joint
Staff which approves all projects, accomplishes Congressional notification, and provides funds to the
combatant commanders for execution. Project planning, design, construction and management are
accomplished by the combatant commanders and their service components. In 2015, Congress
authorized an additional $4.94M for the USEUCOM ERC program in support of the European
Reassurance Initiative (ERI). MILCON funds for ERC have up to 5 years for obligation and ERI
funds have up to 3 years for obligation. The USEUCOM J4 encourages project execution within the
first 2 years of funding in order to re-obligate any savings to other ERC requirements as determined
by the Joint Staff.
Although ERC is driven by U.S. exercise requirements, the program has a distinct engagement value
and is a USEUCOM Theater Security Cooperation activity. Facilities built or improved with ERC are
often utilized by the host nation on a regular basis while U.S. usage is normally limited to exercise
timeframes.
Individual ERC projects are limited in cost to $3M ($4M for safety). Typical costs of $100K to $400K
per project promote efficient use of this limited funding throughout the vast EUCOM AOR. As of
FY15, ERC project submissions use the Overseas Humanitarian Assistance Shared Information
System (OHASIS) as the system of record for all project submission and administration. To request
an account go to www.ohasis.org. ERC program project input requires OHASIS accounts requestors
to explicitly ask for ERC viewing and writing rights when requesting an account.
47
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Legal Basis:
Source: http://uscode.house.gov/download/pls/10C169.txt
The ERC program is authorized under 10 U.S.C. § 2805- Unspecified Minor Construction (only
sections a thru c shown), as amended by § 2802 of NDAA FY 15, as indicated below:
(a) Authority to Carry Out Unspecified Minor Military Construction Projects

(1) Within an amount equal to 125 percent of the amount authorized by law for such
purpose, the Secretary concerned may carry out unspecified minor military construction
projects not otherwise authorized by law.
(2) An unspecified minor military construction project is a military construction project
that has an approved cost equal to or less than $3,000,000. However, if the military
construction project is intended solely to correct a deficiency that is life-threatening,
health-threatening, or safety-threatening, an unspecified minor military construction
project may have an approved cost equal to or less than $4,000,000.
(b) Approval and Congressional Notification

(1) An unspecified minor military construction project costing more than $1,000,000 may
not be carried out under this section unless approved in advance by the Secretary
concerned. This paragraph shall apply even though the project is to be carried out using
funds made available to enhance the deployment and mobility of military forces and
supplies.
(2) When a decision is made to carry out an unspecified minor military construction
project to which paragraph (1) is applicable, the Secretary concerned shall notify in
writing the appropriate committees of Congress of that decision, of the justification for
the project, and of the estimated cost of the project. The project may then be carried out
only after the end of the 21-day period beginning on the date the notification is received
by the committees or, if earlier, the end of the 14-day period beginning on the date on
which a copy of the notification is provided in an electronic medium pursuant to section
480 of this title.
(c) Use of Operation and Maintenance Funds
The Secretary concerned may spend from appropriations available for operation and
maintenance amounts necessary to carry out an unspecified minor military construction
project costing not more than $1,000,000.

ERC FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17
Requested $3.90 $1.74 $8.52 $6.33 $9.88
Allocated $1.34 $1.12 $5.91 $2.22 $7.92
Used $1.18* $1.04* $.060* $0.00* $0.00*
Note: The allocation is based on estimates and the used is based actual obligations.
* These accounts are still actively disbursing funds.
48
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Country FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17

BiH $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Croatia $0.28 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Estonia $0.00 $0.00 $0.64 $0.00 $2.24
Georgia $0.15 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Israel $1.32 $1.01 $0.00 $1.60 $3.20
Latvia $0.00 $0.00 $1.62 $0.60 $0.45
Lithuania $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.22
Poland $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Romania $0.00 $0.45 $0.49 $0.00 $0.00
Slovenia $0.00 $0.00 $0.49 $0.00 $0.00
Ukraine $0.00 $0.00 $3.20 $0.00 $1.81
TOTAL $1.75 $1.46 $6.44 $2.20 $7.92
Note: These funds are based on funds programmed for each FY. MILCON funds
may be obligated/disbursed for 5 years from allocation.
Request Procedures:
 EUCOM Call for Projects message to Components: January

 ERC Workshop for FY and FY+1 Project Review and task order generation: February
 Component/Country Team Initial Submissions to EUCOM via OHASIS: March
 Component/Country Team final coordination: April
 EUCOM Staff/Country Team Project Prioritization: May
 Draft Project Submissions to JCS: June
 Final Project Submissions to JCS: July
 Program to Congress: Sep / Oct
 Congressional Notice to Proceed: 30 Days Later
 Funding Received from Joint Staff: Upon passage of MILCON appropriation
POC Email Address

Lt Col Tim Voruz, ECJ4-OL-FUOPS-CE
timothy.d.voruz.mil@mail.mil
430-5027
49
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
ERF – European Rotational Force Program

Description:
The European Rotational Force (ERF) program supports the participation of eligible
Allies/partner nations in exercises with the U.S. Army’s rotational Armor Brigade Combat Team
(ABCT) during its deployment to the EUCOM AOR. These include the COMBINED RESOLVE
exercise at Hohenfels Training Area as well as ABCT exercises outside Germany. The
incremental costs of Ally/partner nation participation in ABCT exercises are funded through the
use of 10 USC § 2010 (DCCEP), FY14 NDAA Section 1203, and/or FY16 NDAA Section 1251
authorities. The ERF program supports EUCOM’s Combined Land Forces Capability/
Interoperability/ Deployability Line of Activity and the Chief of Staff of the Army’s objective of
providing CONUS-based forces with opportunities to train with European Allies and partners.
Ally/ partner nation eligibility for ERF program support is based on their contribution of land
forces to the Enhanced NATO Response Force (e-NRF) and eligibility under other legal
authorities for funding support. ECJ5-S identifies priority countries for Ally/ partner nation
participation in COMBINED RESOLVE and other events based on the annual e-NRF force
generation process conducted by SHAPE. Highest priority is given to countries contributing
land forces to the current year’s e-NRF cycle. Next highest priority is given to countries
contributing land forces to the following year’s e-NRF cycle. Partner nations that are potential
contributors to the NRF and have land forces participating in NATO’s Operational Capabilities
Concept Evaluation and Feedback program are third in priority. Planning for Ally/partner nation
participation in COMBINED RESOLVE is conducted through the biannual LANDCOM-
USAREUR Combined Training Conference (CTC). At the CTC, EUCOM and USAREUR
confirm whether countries participating in COMBINED RESOLVE and/or other exercises and
seeking ERF program support are sending e-NRF units to the exercise.
The ERF is a program of record in the USEUCOM Headquarters budget. The program is
managed using the Concept and Funding Request (CFR) system. Please note that the program
does not fund Ally/ partner nation participation in NATO strategic exercise program e-NRF
exercises. Allies/ partners that contribute forces to the e-NRF are responsible for sending their
forces to NATO e-NRF exercises (e.g., TRIDENT JUNCTURE, the LEDGER series) and
funding those costs is a national responsibility.
Responsibilities:
ECJ5-S
 Program Management
 Produces annual TASKORD to USAREUR for the European Rotational Force
 Coordination with USAREUR, SHAPE, e-NRF Joint Force HQs, NRF Land Component
Commands
 Identifies priority countries for Ally/partner nation participation in COMBINED RESOLVE and
other exercises with the rotational ABCT and ERF program funding support
 Identifies e-NRF exercises for rotational ABCT participation
 Reviews/approves CFRs
 Coordinate transfer funds from EUCOM to ODCs and USAREUR
ECJ7- JTREX
 Obtains Section 2010 and/or Section 1203 authority from OSD/Joint Staff to support
execution of ERF program funding
50
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
ECCM
 Disburses and transfer funds to ECJ5 and USAREUR
 Coordinates spend plan with HQDA
 Maintains financial obligation records
ODC
 Assists with identifying requirements and obtaining authorities for US assistance to support
Ally/partner nation exercise participation
 Assists with planning transportation of participating unit(s) from home station to exercise
location(s)
USAREUR
 Coordinates ABCT rotations with EUCOM and FORSCOM
 Plans and executes COMBINED RESOLVE for rotational ABCT
 Plans and coordinates Ally/partner nation participation in COMBINED RESOLVE and other
exercises with rotational ABCT
 Identifies participating Ally/partner nation requirements for US assistance
 Facilitates Ally/ partner nation transportation and logistics requirements in Germany
 Submits CFRs requesting ERF program funding to support participation of eligible countries
in COMBINED RESOLVE and/or other exercises
 Supports Ally/partner nation participation in COMBINED RESOLVE and/or other rotational
ABCT exercises
Other EUCOM staff, to include J5 and Legal, provide coordination and subject matter expertise
relating to the program.
Legal Basis:
10 U.S.C. §2010; §1203, FY14 National Defense Authorization Act, §1251, FY16
National Defense Authorization Act
Expenditure of ERF is predicated on satisfying the requirements of the authority cited

(e.g., to expend ERF to cover incremental costs of developing country foreign military
participation in a combined exercise with U.S. Armed Forces, all requirements of 10
U.S.C. §2010 must be satisfied, including authorization procedures).
United States Code TITLE 10 - ARMED FORCES Subtitle A - General Military Law
PART III - TRAINING AND EDUCATION CHAPTER 101 - TRAINING GENERALLY Sec.
2010. Participation of developing countries in combined exercises: payment of incremental
expenses (a) The Secretary of Defense, after consultation with the Secretary of State, may pay
the incremental expenses of a developing country that are incurred by that country as the direct
result of participation in a bilateral or multilateral military exercise if - (1) the exercise is
undertaken primarily to enhance the security interests of the United States; and (2) the
Secretary of Defense determines that the participation by such country is necessary to the
achievement of the fundamental objectives of the exercise and that those objectives cannot be
achieved unless the United States provides the incremental expenses incurred by such country.
(b) The Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report each year, not later than March
1, containing - (1) a list of the developing countries for which expenses have been paid by the
United States under this section during the preceding year; and (2) the amounts expended on
51
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
behalf of each government. (c) The Secretary of Defense shall establish by regulation such
accounting procedures as may be necessary to ensure that funds expended under this section
are properly expended. (d) In this section, the term ''incremental expenses'' means the
reasonable and proper cost of the goods and services that are consumed by a developing
country as a direct result of that country's participation in a bilateral or multilateral military
exercise with the United States, including rations, fuel, training ammunition, and transportation.
Such term does not include pay, allowances, and other normal costs of such country's
personnel.
Sec. 1051. Multilateral, bilateral, or regional cooperation programs: payment of personnel

expenses
(a) The Secretary of Defense may pay the travel, subsistence, and similar personal expenses of
defense personnel of developing countries in connection with the attendance of such personnel at
a multilateral, bilateral, or regional conference, seminar, or similar meeting if the Secretary
determines that the attendance of such personnel at such conference, seminar, or similar meeting
is in the national security interests of the United States.
(b)(1) Except as provided in paragraphs (2) and (3), expenses authorized to be paid under
subsection (al may be paid on behalf of personnel from a developing country only in connection
with travel to, from, and within the area of responsibility of the unified combatant command (as such
term is defined in section 161(c) of this title) in which the multilateral, bilateral, or regional
conference, seminar, or similar meeting for which expenses are authorized is located or in
connection with travel to Canada or Mexico.
(2) In a case in which the headquarters of a unified combatant command is located within the
United States, expenses authorized to be paid under subsection (a) may be paid in connection with
travel of personnel to the united States to attend a multilateral, bilateral, or regional conference,
seminar, or similar meeting.
(3) In the case of defense personnel of a developing country that is not a member of the North
Atlantic Treaty Organization and that is participating in the Partnership for Peace program of the
North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), expenses authorized to be paid under subsection (a)
may be paid in connection with travel of personnel to the territory of any of the countries
participating in the Partnership for Peace program or the territory of any NATO member country.
(4) Expenses authorized to be paid under subsection (a) may not, in the case of any individual,
exceed the amount that would be paid under chapter 7 of title 37 to a member of the armed forces
of the United States (of a comparable grade) for authorized travel of a similar nature.
(c) In addition to the expenses authorized to be paid under subsection (a), the Secretary of
Defense may pay such other expenses in connection with any such conference, seminar, or similar
meeting as the Secretary considers in the national security interests of the United States.
(d) The authority to pay expenses under this section is in addition to the authority to pay certain
expenses and compensation of officers and students of Latin American countries under section
1050 of this title.
(e) Funds available to carry out this section shall be available, to the extent provided in
appropriations Acts, for programs and activities under this section that begin in a fiscal year and
end in the following fiscal year.
NRF also leverages Section 1203, Training of General Purpose forces of the United States Armed
Forces with military and other security forces of friendly foreign countries.

 Land Forces Combined Land Forces Capability/Interoperability/Deployability
52
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED

NRF PE FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17
Requested $11.0 $11.0 $11.0 $11.0
Allocated $4.8 $9.3 $8.2 $8.25
Used $3.5 $5.9 $7.090 $0.000

Albania $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.498 $0.684 $0.318 $0.000
Armenia $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.216 $0.000 $0.000
Bulgaria $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.559 $1.231 $1.540 $0.000
Croatia $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.690 $1.136 $0.000
Georgia $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.644 $0.000 $0.12 $0.000
Kosovo $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.4 $0.000
Moldova $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.235 $0.000 $0.000
Macedonia $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.403 $0.000
Romania $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $1.990 $1.837 $2.266 $0.000
Ukraine $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.58 $0.000
TOTAL $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $4.198 $4.893 $6.763 $0.000
USEUCOM Program Manager

POC Email Address
LTC Darrell Driver, ECJ5-S
DSN 430-7703
darrell.w.driver.mil@mail.mil
MAJ Mark Caudillo, ECJ5-S
mark.s.caudillo2.mil@mail.mil
DSN 430-2288
rafael.r.bonoan.ctr@mail.mil
Mr. Ray Bonoan, ECJ5-S
430-7556
53
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
ERI – European Reassurance Initiative

Description:
If both authorized and appropriated, the Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 Overseas Contingency
Operations (OCO) European Reassurance Initiative (ERI) budget will continue and expand many
of the activities originally proposed by the President in Warsaw on June 3, 2014 and executed in
FY15 and FY16. Additionally, the FY17 ERI funding strengthens deterrence through measures
that provide a quick joint U.S. response against any threat made by aggressive actors in the
region.
Funds provide near-term flexibility and responsiveness to the evolving concerns of U.S. Allies
and partners in Europe, particularly Central and Eastern Europe, and increase the capability and
readiness of U.S. allies and partners.
This is a reflection of the United States’ strong and balanced approach to Russia in the wake of
its aggression in Eastern Europe and elsewhere.
As with FY15 and FY16, the United States will continue to pursue the ERI’s five lines of effort:
Five Lines of Effort (LOE):

1. Increased military rotational presence
2. Additional bilateral and multilateral exercises and training with Allies and Partners
3. Enhanced prepositioning of U.S. equipment
4. Improved infrastructure to allow for greater responsiveness
5. Intensified efforts to build partner capacity with newer NATO Allies and Partners
Legal Basis:
FY16 ERI:
Appropriation of Funds: H.R. 2029 – Consolidated Appropriation’s Act, 2016
Authorization to execute Funds: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016
Explanation of Activities: FY16 European Reassurance Initiative Justification Book
(http://comptroller.defense.gov/Portals/45/Documents/defbudget/fy2016/FY2016_ERI_J-
Book.pdf)
FY17 ERI:
Appropriation of Funds: Pending
Authorization to execute Funds: Pending
Explanation of Activities: FY17 European Reassurance Initiative Justification Book
(http://comptroller.defense.gov/Portals/45/Documents/defbudget/fy2017/FY2017_ERI_J-
Book.pdf)
54
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
The ERI program does not provide stand-alone authority to execute the stated purposes; ERI
funding is predicated on other authorities to execute the stated purpose when that purpose does
not fall within our general mission authority (e.g., use of 10 U.S.C. §2282 (Build Capacity of
Foreign Security Forces), §1207 of the FY12 NDAA (Global Security Contingency Fund) as
amended by §1201 FY15 NDAA).

 Multiple lines of activity supported.
ERI FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17

Requested $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $925.0 $789.3 $3,419.0
Authorized $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $985.0 $789.3 $0.00
Used $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 ~$955.0 N/A N/A
Request Procedures:
The ERI request, coordinated by USEUCOM ECJ5/8, is developed in parallel with the DoD’s
annual base budget requirements. Requirements that are identified to be in line with the overall
intent of ERI are submitted to USEUCOM for review and endorsement by the Commander. The
Department of Defense’s FY17 ERI OCO request was submitted to Congress as part of the FY17
Presidential Budget. Like the FY15 and FY16 ERI requests, all appropriated funds must be
executed as outlined in the Justification Book. Any deviation will require coordination with
OSD.
POC Email Address

christopher.m.macpherson.civ@mail.mil
Mr. Chris Macpherson, ECJ5-R, DSN 430-5355
christopher.m.macpherson.civ@mail.smil.mil
55
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
ESAF – European Security Assistance Fund

Description:
The European Security Assistance Fund (ESAF) consists of grant funds (FMF) and the program
is run by State Department. ESAF provides the EUCOM AOR with a small pool of FMF that is
withheld until the year of execution, and then distributed bilaterally on a competitive basis each
year. The President’s budget requested $3M for this regional fund to be released to eligible
countries in FY 2014, $5M for FY15 and $5M in FY16, however, Congress has been generous
and increased the available amounts as seen below. The ESAF is designed to provide FMF
funding to European countries for projects related to national territorial defense as well as
expeditionary capability development and sustainment, including the sustainment of capabilities
developed through coalition deployments and the maintaining of readiness for potential future
coalition operations. Posts are encouraged to submit discrete and scalable proposals within the
established cap for that fiscal year. Countries in Europe and Eurasia that have received FMF
within the past three years are eligible to apply.
State, in coordination with the Department of Defense, will prioritize funding for this regional
fund according to the following criteria:
 Proposals directly support the sustainment or development of expeditionary capabilities
required for current or future deployments and align with Department priorities for the
country. This may include bilateral and/or regional projects that address critical
capabilities related to ‘Resolute Support’ or other missions.
 Expected host nation commitment, including will and ability to deploy forces and
participate in missions in support of U.S. goals, objectives, and priorities.
 Host government(s) ability to effectively use and sustain the assistance over the long-
term.
 Other available funds are insufficient.
Source: DOS
Program Manager: DOS PM/PPA, David Arnold, ArnoldDE@state.gov, 202-663-3476, or

PMSecurityAssistance@state.gov.
Legal Basis:
Title 22
ESAF FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17

Requested $3.000 $5.000 $5.000 $15.000
Allocated $3.000 $15.000 $35.000 TBD
Used TBD TBD TBD TBD
56
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Country FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16

Estonia $5.000 $7.500
Bulgaria $3.700
Czech Republic $1.200
Estonia $5.000 $7.500
Hungary $1.300
Latvia $5.000 $7.500
Lithuania $5.000 $7.500
Montenegro $0.100
Poland $1.500
Romania $3.700
Slovakia $1.000
Slovenia $1.100
Request Procedures: The following is the template used for submitting ESAF proposals. The
Department of State requests that the ODCs submit through the Post to Main State. However,
ODCs are expected to coordinate submissions with the ECJ5-SCP and the Regional Planners prior
to submission. ECJ5 Regional Planners will provide HQ EUCOM prioritization to HQ DSCA.
SECTION I
BASIC INFORMATION
Country
Point of Contact
PROGRAM OVERVIEW
Name of Briefly state the name of the program.
Program
Recipient Unit or Indicate name and type of unit(s) that would participate (if any unit proposed is not in the military, please
Organization indicate here).
Proposal Priority Indicate the rank of this proposal if there is Total Proposals Indicate the total number of programs for
more than one proposal for this country. this country proposed for ESAF funding.
SECTION II
PROGRAM DETAILS
Program Provide a brief explanation (4-6 sentences) of why the host government is seeking to build expeditionary
Summary and capability and how doing so advances U.S. goals and objectives.
Objectives
Estimated Cost Estimate Program Total Cost
Enter single figure in USD.
In the next section, include a detailed cost break-down according to basic budget categories.
Program Details  Training/advice: (including costs)
 Equipment support: Specify expected equipment requests (including costs).
 Other services: (including costs)
57
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Program Briefly highlight the key milestones associated with the implementation of the proposal, including expected
Timeline timeline for submittal of LOR. Note that these funds will generally be available in September of the fiscal year of
execution.
Future Plans for Has the government expressed interest in or a commitment to future deployments? Briefly describe (4-6
Deployments sentences) the nature any commitments. If specific details, including location, duration, function, etc., are
available, please also include this information.
Past and Present Please provide a brief summary of past and present deployments, including location, duration, size, function,
Deployments and any other relevant information.
Host Does the government have a strategy that the proposed program supports? Briefly describe (4-6 sentences) any
Government host government actions that suggest strong ownership, partnership, and/or interest in this program. Provide
Ownership any follow-on activities or investment planned by the host government that build on the goals and objectives of
the proposed program.
Sustainment Has the government demonstrated a commitment or ability to sustain past U.S. assistance? Outline the plans to
help the host government sustain the proposed assistance in the long-run. What, if any, are the U.S. funding
requirements to sustain the program or associated activities in the out-years?
Relation to Past Please indicate whether this country previously received other U.S. assistance for related purposes, and if so,
and Planned U.S. how does this proposal relate to that assistance (provided or yet to be implemented)? How does the proposed
Assistance program relate to it?
Leahy Vetting FMF funding is subject to the Leahy Law. Describe the specific unit(s) or personnel that would benefit. Does the
embassy have any record of any gross violations of human rights for the intended recipient unit(s)?
Available If the host government has unexpended FMF funds available, explain why these funds cannot be used for this
Funding purpose.
POC Email Address

Mr. Timothy Burke ECJ5-SCP
timothy.s.burke.civ@mail.mil
DSN 430-8396
58
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FMF – Foreign Military Financing – Grants

Description:
The Foreign Military Financing (FMF) program consists of congressionally appropriated grants
and loans which enable eligible foreign governments to purchase U.S. defense articles,
services, and training. FMF funds are applied via Foreign Military Sales (FMS) cases which use
the FMS program to execute government-to-government sales. On a less frequent basis, FMF
also funds purchases through the Direct Commercial Sales (DCS) program (sales between
foreign governments and private U.S. companies). FMF does not provide cash grants to other
countries; it generally pays for sales of specific goods or services through FMS or DCS.
The State Department's Bureau of Political-Military Affairs sets policy for the FMF program,
but the Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA), within the Defense Department,
manages it on a day-to-day basis. In EUCOM Offices of Defense Cooperation (ODCs), military
personnel, and General Service (GS) civilian employees in U.S. embassies play a key role in
managing FMF for recipient countries. Some FMF pays for ODC personnel salaries and
operational costs. Congress appropriates funds for FMF through the yearly Department of State
Foreign Operations Appropriations Act.
Once appropriated for a country, FMF remains available in a DSCA and DFAS-managed trust
fund account until spent. In some cases, unspent FMF grant money can remain "in the pipeline"
for years, though Congress and the Department of State keep a close watch and lagging
spending may impact future allocations. Recent DOS policy is for countries to spend within four
years of receipt, or risk losing the allocation to other countries.
Legal Basis:
The FMF program is authorized by sections 23 and 24 of the Arms Export Control Act (P.L. 90-
269, or the AECA), as amended. Fiscal Year (FY) provisions are contained within Title IV,
International Security Assistance, within the annual National Defense Appropriations Act. To
receive assistance through FMF, countries must meet eligibility requirements contained in the
Foreign Assistance Act and the Arms Export Control Act.
FMF FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17

Requested $168.950 $162.090 $123.400 $102.000 $86.600 $66.850 $126.100 $82.600
Allocated $137.854 $131.161 $107.010 $96.837 $88.502 $151.950 $203.820 $0.000
Used $137.854 $131.171 $107.010 $96.837 $88.502 $151.950 $0.000 $0.000
FMF-Israel FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17

Requested $2,775. $3,000.0 $3,075.0 $3,100.0 $3,100.0 $3,100.0 $3,100.0 $3,100.0
Allocated $2,775. $2,994.0 $3,075.0 $3,100.0 $3,100.0 $3,100.0 $3,100.0 $0.00
Used $2,775. $2,994.0 $3,075.0 $3,100.0 $3,100.0 $3,100.0 $0.000 $0.00
59
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED

Albania $3.000 $3.992 $3.000 $2.848 $2.600 $2.400 $3.400
Armenia $3.000 $2.994 $2.700 $2.564 $2.700 $1.700 $1.400
Azerbaijan $3.000 $2.994 $2.700 $2.564 $2.700 $1.700 $1.400
BiH $4.000 $4.491 $4.500 $4.272 $4.500 $4.000 $4.000
Bulgaria $9.000 $9.481 $8.647 $7.406 $7.000 $5.000 $5.000
Croatia $2.500 $3.493 $2.500 $2.374 $2.500 $2.500 $1.000
Czech Republic $6.000 $5.988 $5.000 $4.747 $3.000 $1.000 $0.500
Estonia $2.500 $2.695 $2.400 $2.279 $2.400 $1.500 $1.750
Georgia $16.000 $15.968 $14.400 $13.672 $12.000 $10.000 $30.000
Hungary $1.000 $0.998 $0.900 $0.854 $0.450 $0.000 $0.000
Kosovo $2.500 $5.000 $3.000 $2.848 $4.000 $4.400 $4.000
Latvia $2.500 $2.794 $2.248 $2.134 $2.250 $1.500 $1.750
Lithuania $2.700 $2.994 $2.550 $2.420 $2.549 $1.500 $1.750
Macedonia $4.000 $3.992 $3.600 $3.418 $3.600 $4.000 $3.600
Malta $0.455 $0.399 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Moldova $0.750 $1.497 $1.250 $1.187 $1.250 $1.250 $12.750
Montenegro $1.200 $1.472 $1.200 $1.139 $1.200 $1.200 $1.000
Poland $47.000 $33.932 $24.165 $18.989 $14.000 $9.000 $9.000
Region/Europe $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $3.000 $15.000 $35.000
Romania $12.999 $12.974 $12.000 $11.391 $8.000 $5.400 $4.400
Serbia $1.000 $1.896 $1.800 $1.709 $1.800 $1.800 $1.800
Slovakia $1.250 $1.397 $1.000 $.949 $0.450 $0.000 $0.000
Slovenia $0.500 $0.748 $0.450 $0.427 $1.550 $0.000 $0.000
Turkey $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Ukraine $11.000 $8.982 $7.000 $6.646 $6.103 $47.000 $80.320
TOTAL $137.854 $131.171 $107.010 $96.837 $88.502 $76.850 $203.820

Israel $2,775.0 $2,994.0 $3,075.0 $3,100.0 $3,100.0 $3,100.0 $3,100.0
TOTAL $2,775.0 $2,994.0 $3,075.0 $3,100.0 $3,100.0 $3,100.0 $3,100.0
Request Procedures:
FMF is executed via downrange ODCs, monitored by the ECJ5 Regional Country Desk Officers,
and submitted to HHQ by ECJ5-SCP. Annual FMF Budget request are submitted by the ODCs
two years in advance. The budget justification call is usually sent in June/July with inputs from
the ODCs to HQ EUCOM by September. ECJ5-SCP works with the ECJ5 Regional planners to
consolidate and forward the inputs to Joint Staff. The Joint Staff consolidates CCMD inputs
60
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
and forwards to the Defense Security Cooperation Agency for work through OSD and State
Department.
The DOD process is mirrored on the DOS side, with the ODC submitting funding requests
through the Ambassador’s annual Mission Resource Request. The DOS and DOD submissions
come together at the April “roundtable” for adjudication. Actual allocation decisions are made
by the interagency process involving OSD, DoS, DSCA, and EUCOM ECJ5.
Actual Funding allocations normally arrive late in the FY due to the interagency and
congressional interactions.
POC Email address

Mr. Timothy Burke ECJ5-SCP timothy.s.burke.civ@mail.mil
DSN 430-8396
61
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
GCMC – George C. Marshall European Center

Description:
 US/DEU Bi-lateral, international, interagency, and interdisciplinary security studies institution

with foreign language training capacity (Partner Language Training Center Europe - PLTCE)
and an in-house regional/multi-national network (the Partnership for Peace Consortium)
 Bottom Line: A strategic asset used to build partner capacity that shapes policy outcomes in
support of shared goals; strategic enabler for US and German security priorities
 Mission: The mission of the Marshall Center, as a vital instrument of German-American
cooperation, is to create a more stable environment by advancing democratic institutions
and relationships; promoting active, peaceful, whole-of-government approaches to address
transnational regional security challenges; and creating and enhancing enduring
partnerships worldwide.
 Funding through OSD and DSCA. Other funding sources include DEU MoD.
 Legal Basis/Authority and Regulation:
o 10 USC § 184, Regional Centers for Security Studies
o DoDD 5200.41E, DoD Regional Centers for Security Studies, 30 June 2016
 GCMC Priorities and GCMC’s Business Model:
GCMC Priorities GCMC’s Business Model
• Counter Terrorism (CT) and Countering Integrates the Mutually Supporting Elements of
Transnational Organized Crime (CTOC) Designated Programs to Meet Mission Requirements:
• Europe’s Eastern Flank • Resident Programs – foundational, build the network
• Europe’s Southern Flank • Non-Resident Outreach – reinforce the foundation,
• Cyber Security flexible and responsive, extends the network
• Building Integrity & Anti-Corruption • Alumni – enhance and sustain Resident/Non-
Resident programs, maintains and operationalizes the
network
• PLTCE – specialized linguist instruction that enables
network communication in a single, common language
• PfPC – independent organization that provides
programs that are complementary to GCMC efforts
USEUCOM Funding History: All values are in millions of dollars.
GCMC FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17

Requested $31.300 $34.000 $26.900 $26.100 $28.800 $32.200 $29.200 $27.600
Allocated $27.300 $29.900 $26.900 $24.300 $28.800 $32.200
Used $27.500 $29.500 $26.500 $24.300 $28.800 $32.200
By Region Point of Contact (POC):
POC Email address

MAJ Joe Gardner
joseph.gardner@marshallcenter.org
Central & Southeast Europe (DSN 440-2880)
MAJ Jason James
jason.james@marshallcenter.org
Black Sea/Eurasia and Baltics (DSN 440-2405)
MAJ Dhramen Singh
dhramen.singh@marshallcenter.org
Central Asia (DSN 440-2812)
62
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
GL&S – Global Lift and Sustain

Description:
This authority permits the Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, to
provide logistics support, supplies, and services to allied forces participating in combined operations
with U.S. Armed Forces. This authority may be used only for a combined operation that is carried out
during active hostilities or as part of a contingency operation or a noncombat operation (including an
operation in support of the provision of humanitarian or foreign disaster assistance, a country
stabilization operation, or a peacekeeping operation); and in a case in which the Secretary of
Defense determines that the allied forces to be provided logistic support, supplies, and services are
essential to the success of the combined operation and would not be able to participate in the
combined operation.
Legal Basis:
§127d of Title 10, United States Code. Allied forces participating in combined operations:
authority to provide logistic support, supplies, and services
(a) Authority.—(1) Subject to subsections (b) and (c), the Secretary of Defense may provide logistic
support, supplies, and services to allied forces participating in a combined operation with the armed
forces of the United States.
(2) In addition to any logistic support, supplies, and services provided under paragraph (1), the
Secretary may provide logistic support, supplies, and services to allied forces solely for the purpose
of enhancing the interoperability of the logistical support systems of military forces participating in
combined operations with the United States in order to facilitate such operations. Such logistic
support, supplies, and services may also be provided under this paragraph to a nonmilitary logistics,
security, or similar agency of an allied government if such provision would directly benefit the armed
forces of the United States.
(3) Provision of support, supplies, and services pursuant to paragraph (1) or (2) may be made only
with the concurrence of the Secretary of State.
(b) Limitations.—(1) The authority provided by subsection (a)(1) may be used only in accordance with
the Arms Export Control Act and other export control laws of the United States.
(2) The authority provided by subsection (a)(1) may be used only for a combined operation—
(A) that is carried out during active hostilities or as part of a contingency operation or a
noncombat operation (including an operation in support of the provision of humanitarian or
foreign disaster assistance, a country stabilization operation, or a peacekeeping operation
under chapter VI or VII of the Charter of the United Nations); and
(B) in a case in which the Secretary of Defense determines that the allied forces to be
provided logistic support, supplies, and services—
(i) are essential to the success of the combined operation; and
(ii) would not be able to participate in the combined operation but for the provision of
such logistic support, supplies, and services by the Secretary.
(c) Limitations on Value.—(1) The value of logistic support, supplies, and services provided under
subsection (a)(1) in any fiscal year may not exceed $100,000,000.
(2) The value of the logistic support, supplies, and services provided under subsection (a)(2) in any
fiscal year may not exceed $5,000,000.
(d) Annual Report.—(1) Not later than December 31 each year, the Secretary of Defense shall
submit to the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate
and the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of
Representatives a report on the use of the authority provided by subsection (a) during the preceding
63
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
fiscal year.
(2) Each report under paragraph (1) shall be prepared in coordination with the Secretary of State.
(3) Each report under paragraph (1) shall include, for the fiscal year covered by the report, the
following:
(A) Each nation provided logistic support, supplies, and services through the use of the
authority provided by subsection (a).
(B) For each such nation, a description of the type and value of logistic support, supplies, and
services so provided.
(e) Definition.—In this section, the term “logistic support, supplies, and services” has the meaning
given that term in section 2350(1) of this title.
(Added Pub. L. 109–364, div. A, title XII, §1201(a), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2410, §127c;
renumbered §127d, Pub. L. 110–181, div. A, title X, §1063(a)(1)(A), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 321;
Pub. L. 111–383, div. A, title X, §1075(b)(3), title XII, §1202, Jan. 7, 2011, 124 Stat. 4369, 4385.)
References in Text
The Arms Export Control Act, referred to in subsec. (b)(1), is Pub. L. 90–629, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat.
1320, as amended, which is classified principally to chapter 39 (§2751 et seq.) of Title 22, Foreign
Relations and Intercourse. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set
out under section 2751 of Title 22 and Tables.
Amendments
2011—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 111–383, §1202(a), designated existing provisions as par. (1), inserted
“of the United States” after “armed forces”, struck out “Provision of such support, supplies, and
services to the forces of an allied nation may be made only with the concurrence of the Secretary of
State.” at end, and added pars. (2) and (3).
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 111–383, §1202(b)(1), substituted “subsection (a)(1)” for “subsection (a)” in par.
(1) and in introductory provisions of par. (2).
Subsec. (c)(1). Pub. L. 111–383, §1202(b)(2)(A), substituted “The” for “Except as provided in
paragraph (2), the” and “subsection (a)(1)” for “this section”.
Subsec. (c)(2). Pub. L. 111–383, §1202(b)(2)(B), substituted “The value of the logistic support,
supplies, and services provided under subsection (a)(2) in any fiscal year may not” for “In addition to
any logistic support, supplies, and services provided under subsection (a) that are covered by
paragraph (1), the value of logistic support, supplies, and services provided under this section solely
for the purposes of enhancing the interoperability of the logistical support systems of military forces
participating in combined operation of the United States in order to facilitate such operations may not,
in any fiscal year,”.
Subsec. (d)(1). Pub. L. 111–383, §1075(b)(3), substituted “Committee on Foreign Affairs” for
“Committee on International Relations”.
2008—Pub. L. 110–181 renumbered section 127c of this title, relating to allied forces participating in
combined operations, as this section.
 Prepare Military Forces for Peacekeeping Missions
GL&S FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17

Requested $0.306 $0.320 $1.500 $1.500 $0.841 $0.841 $1.154
Allocated $0.306 $0.320 $1.190 $1.460 $1.275 $1.204 $1.154
Used $0.306 $0.320 $1.190 $1.460 $1.275 $1.204 $1.154
64
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED

Armenia $0.000 $0.000 $0.850 $1.120 $0.841 $0.841 $0.730 0.0
Romania $0.306 $0.320 $0.340 $0.340 $0.340 $0.321 $0.376 0.0
Moldova $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.094 $0.042 $0.048 0.0
TOTAL $0.306 $0.320 $1.190 $1.460 $1.275 $1.204 $1.154 0.0
POC Email Address
MAJ Mark Caudillo, ECJ5-S, 430-2288 mark.s.caudillo2.mil@mail.mil
65
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
GPOI – Global Peace Operations Initiative

Description:
GPOI is a security assistance program intended to enhance international capacity to effectively

conduct United Nations (UN) and regional peace operations (PO) by 1) building partner country
capabilities to train and sustain peacekeeping proficiencies; 2) increasing number of capable
military troops and formed police units (FPU) available for deployment; and 3) facilitating
preparation, logistical support, and deployment of military units and FPUs to POs.
GPOI was launched as the U.S. contribution to the G8 Action Plan for Expanding Global
Capability for Peace Operations, adopted at the 2004 G8 Sea Island Summit. Reflective of
global PO requirements when GPOI was established, its initial focus was on significantly
increasing the number of peacekeepers available for deployment. These goals were achieved
and GPOI evolved; still ensuring sufficient numbers of capable peacekeepers were available but
shifting program emphasis from direct U.S. training to train-the-trainer, which enables partners
to build sustainable, self-sufficient, national PO training capabilities.
GPOI’s primary objective is to work in coordination with other USG, international, and national
efforts to assist partner countries to establish and strengthen the institutional infrastructure
required to achieve and sustain self-sufficient capability to conduct PO training. GPOI continues
to serve as a mechanism for supporting units deploying to UN/regional peacekeeping missions;
building capacity of regional organizations; and supporting the enhancement of multilateral
approaches and partnerships to coordinate international PO capacity building efforts.
Acceptable activities include: PO training; efforts to strengthen PO training centers; equipment
(training, office, etc.); modest infrastructure refurbishment; curriculum/POI development; lessons
learned/AAR systems, and equipment/limited transportation to support deployment of units.
The emphasis of GPOI is Africa, where most of the funding received annually is allocated.
Within Europe, partner countries include: Albania, Armenia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia,
Macedonia, Moldova, Romania, Serbia, Slovenia, and Ukraine.
The U.S. Department of State Bureau of Political-Military Affairs manages the Peace keeping
Operations (PKO) account through which GPOI is funded. Accordingly, the Bureau is
responsible for the program oversight and financial management of GPOI-funded activities. The
Bureau coordinates with the OSD, JS, and regional Combatant Commands. DoD organizations
implement nearly half of all GPOI programs, events, and activities; DSCA serves as resource
management agent.
Legal Basis:
 Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (Public Law 87-195), Section 551

 Annual Peacekeeping Operations (PKO) appropriation in the Foreign Operations
Appropriations Act.
o Prepare Military Forces for Expeditionary Operations

o Combined Land Forces Capability, Interoperability and Deployability
66
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
GPOI FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17

Requested $13.700 $5.500 $6.500 $5.700 $4.960 $4.350 $2.040 $14.6
Allocated $1.200 $3.951 $6.365 $3.750 $2.800 $5.675 $1.633 TBD
Used $1.025 $3.920 $6.170 $3.125 $0.400 $5.675 $0.00 TBD

Albania $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Armenia $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.640 $0.800 $1.200 $0.900 $8.400
BiH $0.400 $0.967 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Bulgaria $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Croatia $0.800 $0.884 $0.000 $0.400 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $3.200
Macedonia $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.400 $0.200 $0.300 $0.000 $0.000
Moldova $0.000 $0.000 $1.675 $0.770 $0.600 $0.950 $0.000 $0.700
Romania $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Serbia $0.000 $2.100 $3.500 $0.700 $0.450 $2.425 $0.733 $1.800
Slovenia $0.000 $0.000 $1.190 $0.840 $0.450 $0.800 $0.000 $0.500
Ukraine $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
BMTF $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.300 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
TOTAL $1.200 $3.951 $6.365 $3.750 $2.800 $5.675 $1.633 $14.600
Request Procedures:
In FY15, DOS revised/accelerated the annual proposal timeline. For FY16 proposals, timelines
will adjust again. DOS/DOD will issue FY16 proposal guidance in ~Mar/Apr ’15. Upon receipt of
DOS/DOD guidance, EUCOM issues calling message for proposals with a suspense on/about
22 May ‘15. EUCOM submits proposals to DOD the first week of June; OSD reviews and
forwards to DOS. ECJ5-SCP (GPOI) presents proposals at the annual GPOI World Wide
Consultations in June. The GPOI Coordinating Committee (Senior DOS/DOD body) evaluates
and approves an annual recommended allocation in December. Subsequently (NLT Feb ’16)
recommended allocations are submitted for Congressional Notification. When CN is complete,
funds are provided to DSCA. ODCs/other implementers can then submit Memos of Request
(MOR) through ECJ5-SCP (GPOI) to implement these programs as pseudo-FMS cases.

POC Email Address
Ms. Ann Stieglitz
ann.p.stieglitz.ctr@mail.mil
ECJ5-SCP, DSN 430-5242
67
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
GSCF – Global Security Contingency Fund

Description:
The Global Security Contingency Fund (GSCF) is an authority that draws on the pooled resources of
the Departments of State and Defense, and incentivizes joint planning to provide security and justice
sector assistance for partner countries so we can, through these key countries, address emergent
challenges and opportunities important to U.S. national security.
The GSCF can be used to provide assistance to countries designated by the Secretary of State, with
the concurrence of the Secretary of Defense:
a) To enhance the capabilities of a country’s national military forces, and other national security
forces that conduct border and maritime security, internal defense, and counterterrorism operations,
as well as the government agencies responsible for such forces, to: conduct border and maritime
security, internal defense, and counterterrorism operations; and participate in or support military,
stability, or peace support operations consistent with United States foreign policy and national
security interests.
b) For the justice sector (including law enforcement and prisons), rule of law programs, and
stabilization efforts in countries when conflict or instability in a country or region challenges the
existing capability of civilian providers to deliver such assistance.
The GSCF was established by section 1207 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2012 (P.L. 112-81), which describes the scope of the authority. No funds were
appropriated for the GSCF in FY 2012; rather, relevant legislation authorized transfers of up to $250
million total from other FY 2012 appropriations. Once transferred, all funds will remain available for
obligation until September 30, 2015. Subsequent authorizations have extended the program until
September 30, 2017.
The Departments of State and Defense have identified three primary goals for the GSCF:
1) Improve U.S. ability to promptly respond to emergent requirements for capacity building
assistance in security sectors of countries of strategic importance to the United States.
2) Develop a tailored and integrated plan of assistance across the partner country’s security sector
as directed.
3) Model interagency collaboration in the planning, implementation, and assessment of security

sector assistance efforts by creating joint planning structures and implementation procedures for the
GSCF.
Programming of GSCF funds will be guided by the following overarching principles:
* The Secretary of State is responsible for the supervision and general direction of foreign assistance,
and Chief of Mission will guide implementation of all approved programs at
post.
* GSCF programming will focus only on countries the Secretaries of State and Defense determine to
be U.S. national-level security priorities.
* State and DoD will jointly formulate GSCF plans impacting national security forces, and State will
consult with DoD on justice sector and stabilization programs formulated by State,
68
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
to achieve a tailored and integrated approach across the security and justice sectors.
* The GSCF provides a mechanism for short-term, high-impact assistance; programs should be
designed to ensure that sustainment beyond two or three years is achieved wherever
possible by the partner country or built into future partner country bilateral security sector assistance
requests.
* The GSCF will be used to support State regional bureau and DoD regional office policy objectives
as they tie to national security priorities and will rely on regional and functional
bureaus and offices to implement country projects. U.S. Embassy Country Teams and Combatant
Commands are encouraged to help identify top national security priorities and help lead on GSCF
planning and implementation.
* Existing U.S. security sector assistance systems, processes, and expertise will be used for
implementation whenever feasible.
* State and USAID will lead on planning for the justice sector and stabilization programs.
* Other U.S. Government agencies will be encouraged to participate, as appropriate, in GSCF
* Success depends strongly on substantial partner country commitment and involvement in GSCF
* Greater overall success is achieved through collaboration with international donors and other
partners, and existing multilateral initiatives.
* GSCF-funded programs must include elements that promote observance of and respect for human
rights and fundamental freedoms, and respect for legitimate civilian authority within the country
concerned.
* Monitoring and evaluation will be emphasized in GSCF projects, with a focus on compiling lessons
learned to inform future efforts.
-----------------------------
GSCF COUNTRY PROJECT CRITERIA
-----------------------------
National Priorities - The country and problem set to be addressed must be a U.S. national security
priority as originally or ultimately identified by senior State and Defense Department
leadership. Situations already receiving attention at the Deputies level are most likely to be
considered national priorities. Only a small number of countries will be designated for GSCF funding
each year.
Challenges and Contingencies - The GSCF is for emergent challenges (and opportunities) that
cannot be addressed adequately in the current budget cycle with traditional security assistance
programs. Contingencies are the top priority of the GSCF. It will not be used to meet longstanding
requirements that are eligible for, but have not been funded through, other programs unless
circumstances have unexpectedly changed. Before determining countries for consideration, the
Departments will consider whether other regular or contingency funds could better address or are
already meeting the identified needs, including through repurposing of existing security assistance
within a country or regional bureau. Moreover, the GSCF will not be used to simply plus-up existing
security assistance endeavors, or for projects that lack funding due to earlier prioritization, or for front-
line states already receiving dedicated funding. There is no imperative to spend the entire amount
authorized to be transferred into the GSCF in a given year - the authority will only be used when both
Secretaries believe the circumstances warrant.
Opportunities - The fund may also be used for opportunities that may arise unexpectedly and where
a concerted effort now could pay big dividends later (e.g., help mitigate potential
threats to U.S. national security).
69
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
------------------------
GSCF COUNTRY DESIGNATION
------------------------
Many, if not most, GSCF country designations will originate directly with senior leadership, who are
responsible for designating all GSCF countries. However, bureaus and other entities, including
Ambassadors and Combatant Commanders, are encouraged to provide suggestions on uses of the
GSCF to your country desks or the GSCF staff.
The GSCF staff and regional/functional bureaus/offices will be responsible for jointly preparing
Country Designation Memoranda for consideration by the Deputy Secretary of State for Management
and Resources, and the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, and for final approval by the
Secretaries of State and Defense. The GSCF staff will ensure appropriate formulation, staffing, and
senior-level consideration of all GSCF Country Designation Memoranda.
A GSCF Country Designation Memorandum should include:
a) Strategic context and country objectives.

b) The components of the security sector requiring U.S. security assistance, and the specific
components that could benefit from immediate-impact, shorter-term GSCF funding.
c) Detailed objectives for the proposed GSCF activities, and whether sustainment is expected to pass
to the partner country or to another assistance program in the out years.
d) If assistance is to be provided for the justice sector, rule of law programs, or stabilization efforts, a
description of how conflict or instability in a country or region challenges the existing capability of
civilian providers to deliver such assistance.
e) Funding targets and proposed start/end dates for each GSCF activity.
f) Explanation of why GSCF is the most appropriate source of funds and why this proposal cannot be
funded within existing bilateral resources, or with other global or regional funds.
After a GSCF Country Designation Memorandum has been approved by the Secretary of State with
the concurrence of the Secretary of Defense, the Secretaries will establish a GSCF Project Steering
Group, chaired in most cases by State and DoD Regional Deputy Assistant Secretaries, who will
provide policy guidance and oversight to the planning and implementation effort. Regional and
functional bureaus/offices from State, DoD, and other agencies (as appropriate) will be expected to
detail experts to the GSCF staff-led "surge staff" to develop a tailored and integrated GSCF country
security sector assistance implementation plan. Following approval of the implementation plan by
the Secretaries (or potentially their designees), the GSCF Project Steering Group will initiate and
ensure plan implementation. Congress will be consulted, as the legislation requires detailed
notification to six committees 15 days prior to the initiation of an activity under GSCF
authority. Performance will be closely monitored and evaluated.
Legal Basis:
Section 1207 of the FY12 NDAA establishes the “Global Security Contingency Fund.” SecState
and SecDef can use this money to provide assistance—
(1) To enhance the capabilities of a foreign country’s national military forces and certain other
security forces (as well as the government agencies responsible for such forces) to
a. Conduct border and maritime security, internal defense, and counterterrorism operations; and
70
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
b. Participate in or support military, stability, or peace support operations consistent with US

foreign policy and national security interests; and
(2) for the justice sector (including law enforcement and prisons), rule of law programs, and
stabilization efforts in those cases in which conflict or instability in a country or region challenges
the existing capability of civilian providers to deliver such assistance.
Lead agency: Programs will be jointly determined and administered. SecDef has the lead in
security programs; SecState has lead in justice sector/stabilization programs.
Allocation: The Department of State MUST contribute at least 20% of the money required for
each activity.
Funding: Section 1207 provides for funding only from the Secretary of Defense, by transfers
from Operations and Maintenance, Defense-Wide. Maximum transfer per year $200 million.
Notify and wait: Section 1207 requires Congressional notification at least 15 days before
beginning a program.
Note: Provisions in the FY2012 Consolidated Appropriations Act (PL112-74) also

require “notify and wait” before transferring any State or DoD money to the Fund.
Spending limits: $350 million for a combination of the Fund and the “interim” provisions in the
note below in FY 2012; the Fund limit in Fy2013-17 is $250 million/year.
Administration: Joint State/DoD staff.
Termination: Authority terminates 9/30/2017. However, programs commenced before that

date may be completed after that date, but only using funds available from fiscal years 2012
through 2017.
GSCF FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17

Requested $0.000 $0.000 $3.500 $0.000 $19.000 $0.000 $23.400
Allocated $0.000 $0.000 $3.100 $0.000 $19.000 $0.000 $23.400
Used $0.000 $0.000 $3.100 $0.000 $17.000 $0.000 $0.000

Hungary $0.000 $0.000 $1.033 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Romania $0.000 $0.000 $1.033 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Slovakia $0.000 $0.000 $1.034 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Ukraine $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $19.000 $0.000 $0.000
TOTAL $0.000 $0.000 $3.100 $0.000 $19.000 $0.000 $0.000
71
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
POC Email Address

LTC John-Michael Insetta ECJ5-SCP John.m.insetta.mil@mail.mil
DSN 430-6834
72
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
HMA –Humanitarian Mine Action

Description:
The Combatant Commander (CCDR) executes Humanitarian Mine Action (HMA) activities using
funds appropriated for Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster and Civic Aid (OHDACA). The goal of the
DOD HMA program is to relieve human suffering and the adverse effects of explosive remnants of
war on noncombatants while advancing the combatant commanders’ security cooperation strategies.
HMA engagements assist Partner Nations (PN) by conducting Train-the-Trainer (TTT) missions that
are targeted to develop an indigenous HMA infrastructure in a wide range of activities.
HMA TTT engagements include:

Technical Demining
Physical Security/Stockpile Management (PSSM)
Mine Victim Assistance (MVA) (i.e. Role 1 emergency medical)
Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD)
Mine Risk Education (MRE)
Underwater Technical Survey
The EUCOM HMA program manager receives OHDACA funds through the Defense Security
Cooperation Agency (DSCA), which monitors the execution of DOD HMA operations. OHDACA
appropriation is two-year funding, and execution can cross fiscal years.
HMA OHDACA funding is vulnerable in the event of a large scale international disaster (e.g.,
tsunami, major earthquake), since such an event may make funding unavailable for non-emergency
TSC activities.
Legal Basis:
 10 U.S.C. § 407
 CJCSI 3207.01C, 28 Sep 2012, Change 1, 1 Aug 2013
Conventional Weapons and Munitions Elimination.
HMA FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17

Requested $3.200 $1.000 $1.500 $2.640 $3.000 $1.500 $5.030
Allocated $3.000 $1.000 $1.500 $1.547 $1.120 $1.203 $0.000
Used $1.800 $0.650 $1.421 $1.521 $3.120 $1.159 $0.000
73
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED

Albania $0.400 $0.000 $0.010 $0.200 $0.147 $0.100
Armenia $0.000 $0.250 $0.169 $0.169 $0.040 $0.010
Azerbaijan $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.1300
BiH $0.000 $0.000 $0.127 $0.127 $0.000 $0.50
Bulgaria $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Croatia $0.000 $0.000 $0.462 $0.462 $0.000 $0.000
Cyprus $0.000 $0.000 $0.038 $0.038 $0.18 $0.020
Estonia $0.500 $0.100 $0.107 $0.107 $0.054 $0.000
Georgia $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.0209 $0.020
Kosovo $0.300 $0.100 $0.051 $0.051 $0.120 $0.008
Moldova $0.000 $0.000 $0.082 $0.082 $0.132 $0.035

Montenegro $0.000 $0.000 $0.180 $0.180 $0.428 $0.215
Serbia $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.200

Slovenia $0.000 $0.000 $0.135 $0.135 $0.000 $0.000
Ukraine $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.350
TOTAL $1.800 $0.650 $1.350 $1.421 $1.120 $1.590
Request Procedures:
HMA assistance is outlined in the CJCSI 3207.01C Department of Defense Support to
Humanitarian Mine Action.
POC Email Address
GySgt Mark Veneris, ECJ9-CPD SIPR:mark.a.veneris.mil@mail.smil.mil

DSN 430-5348 NIPR: mark.a.veneris.mil@mail.mil
74
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
IMET – International Military Education and Training

Description:
International Military Education and Training (IMET) is a financing mechanism through which the
United States pays for the training or education of foreign military and a limited number of civilian
personnel. IMET grants are allocated for foreign governments. Working with the ODC, the foreign
governments choose the courses their personnel will attend. IMET funding sends students to
approximately 150 U.S. military training institutions throughout the United States. A wide variety of
courses (over 2,000), including topics ranging from War Colleges to helicopter repair to military
justice systems, qualify for IMET funding. On occasion, IMET-funded programs are conducted in the
recipient country by mobile education and training teams. U.S. instructors travel to foreign countries
to teach courses to groups of students simultaneously translated into their native language.
Created in 1961, the IMET program is often considered to be the "traditional" U.S. military training
program. It is funded though the foreign aid appropriations process and overseen by the Department
of State, but implemented by the Department of Defense.
According to Section 541 of the Foreign Assistance Act, IMET-funded training is intended:
 To encourage effective and mutually beneficial relations and increased understanding
between the United States and foreign countries in furtherance of the goals of international
peace and security;
 To improve the ability of participating foreign countries to utilize their resources, including
defense articles and defense services obtained by them from the United States, with
maximum effectiveness, thereby contributing to greater self-reliance by such countries; and
 To increase the awareness of nationals of foreign countries participating in such activities of
basic issues involving internationally recognized human rights.
Legal Basis:
Chapter 5 of Part II of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (P.L. 87-195), as amended,
authorizes the IMET program to provide military education and training to foreign military and
civilian personnel.
IMET FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17

Requested $30.700 $30.500 $30.100 $28.600 $29.550 $29.500 $31.300 $36.143
Allocated $30.500 $30.286 $29.994 $28.772 $29.819 $30.400 $31.300 $31.400
Used $30.205 $30.286 $29.994 $28.772 $29.819 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
75
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED

Albania $0.950 $1.064 $1.067 $0.983 $1.063 $1.087 $1.000
Armenia $0.450 $0.449 $0.675 $0.680 $0.586 $0.590 $0.600
Azerbaijan $0.900 $0.943 $0.700 $0.576 $0.592 $0.593 $0.600
BiH $1.000 $0.985 $0.999 $0.872 $.982 $0.991 $1.000
Bulgaria $1.650 $1.778 $1.746 $1.996 $2.063 $2.000 $2.000
Croatia $0.800 $0.956 $0.946 $1.024 $1.135 $1.131 $1.100
Czech Republic $1.900 $1.992 $1.892 $1.752 $1.800 $1.748 $1.800
Estonia $1.100 $1.143 $1.212 $1.134 $1.211 $1.227 $1.200
Georgia $1.800 $1.895 $1.879 $1.799 $1.791 $2.165 $2.200
Greece $0.100 $0.098 $0.102 $0.093 $0.097 $0.200 $0.200
Hungary $1.000 $1.077 $0.947 $1.044 $1.152 $0.993 $1.000
Kosovo $0.700 $0.678 $0.810 $0.819 $0.750 $0.737 $0.750
Latvia $1.100 $1.135 $1.129 $1.151 $1.267 $1.228 $1.200
Lithuania $1.100 $1.143 $1.125 $1.140 $1.225 $1.198 $1.200
Macedonia $0.950 $1.041 $1.064 $1.002 $1.070 $1.157 $1.100
Malta $0.150 $0.153 $0.150 $0.152 $0.147 $0.100 $0.100
Moldova $0.660 $0.898 $0.860 $0.725 $0.779 $1.139 $1.150
Montenegro $0.400 $0.455 $0.574 $0.569 $0.596 $0.613 $0.600
Poland $2.200 $2.090 $2.100 $1.895 $2.000 $1.996 $2.000
Portugal $0.100 $0.093 $0.025 $0.093 $0.081 $0.090 $0.100
Romania $1.700 $1.750 $1.754 $1.614 $1.737 $1.696 $1.700
Russia $0.095 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Serbia $0.900 $0.893 $0.887 $0.875 $0.878 $0.867 $1.050
Slovakia $0.900 $0.950 $1.003 $0.946 $0.897 $0.942 $0.900
Slovenia $0.700 $0.712 $0.669 $0.612 $0.717 $0.602 $0.650
Turkey $5.000 $3.990 $3.839 $3.415 $3.274 $3.096 $3.200
Ukraine $1.900 $1.925 $1.840 $1.811 $1.929 $1.889 $2.900
TOTAL $30.205 $30.286 $29.994 $28.772 $29.819 $30.073 $31.300
Request Procedures:
Procedures and timeline: DSCA calling message normally arrives in July, requiring ODCs to submit
requests to HQ EUCOM NLT the end of September. EUCOM J5-SCP and the Regionals submit
requested funding levels 24 months prior to the beginning of the applicable fiscal year. The
submission is sent to Joint Staff, where it is consolidated with other CCMD inputs and forwarded to
the Defense Security Cooperation Agency. From there, the proposal is worked with OSD and State
Department, in the same ‘roundtable’ process as the Foreign Military Financing Program discussion.
POC Email address

Mr. Timothy Burke ECJ5-SCP, 430-8396 timothy.s.burke.civ@mail.mil
76
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
JCET – Joint Combined Exchange Training

Description: The funding resource is referred to as 2011 dollars because the authority to
conduct JCETs is found at 10 U.S.C. §2011, DOD Authorization Act FY99 (as amended by
FY99 National Defense Authorization Act 1062) DoD Leahy vetting is required.
Source of the Funds: MFP 11 through USSOCOM.
10 U.S.C. § 2011 authority is separate and distinct from that contained in the Foreign Assistance Act.
COMUSSOCOM and Geographic CCDRs are authorized to expend JCET funds to conduct this
training. The training must occur overseas. When the foreign nation is a developing nation,
COMUSSOCOM may fund that nation's incremental expenses, if necessary, to conduct §2011
training. The purpose of this enactment, as stated in the 1991 Senate Armed Services Committee
Report, is and must be U.S. SOF training, not to render foreign internal assistance or to conduct FID.
Accordingly, there must be a clear and articulated link between the training provided and U.S. SOF
unit's Mission Essential Tasks. Finally, 10 U.S.C. §2011 mandates annual reporting to Congress.
Procedures for acquiring funds, including timeline:
1. MFP-11 Funded JCETs: USSOCOM distributes the funds to the four MACOMs (USASOC,
AFSOC, MARSOC, and NAVSPECWARCOM). The MACOMs fund the JCETs through their
component units.
Note: In FY-14 USSOCOM temporarily authorized MFP-2 Funded JCETs, utilizing GCC Operations
and Maintenance (O&M) funding to support the JCET Program IAW GCC/TSOC engagement
strategies. SOCOM discontinued that funding option, as the tracking of non-SOCOM JCETs funds
became insurmountable, as double counting confused the auditing processes.
2. JCET Movement Funding: Starting in FY-15 USSOCOM assumed the responsibility for funding
all JCET movements (Inter-Theater and Intra-Theater). Ending in FY-15 USSOCOM no longer funds
movements for JCS Exercise, as those movements require GCC allocated JETP Funding. If a JCET
precedes or follows a JCS Exercise, the JCET program will resource a pre-coordinated percentage
of the movement cost (normally 50%).
Legal Basis: 10 U.S.C. § 2011
Section 2011 special operations forces: training with friendly foreign forces
(a) Authority to pay training expenses. Under regulations prescribed pursuant to subsection (c),
the commander of the special operations command established pursuant to section 167 of
this title and the commander of any other unified or specified combatant command may pay,
or authorize payment for, any of the following expenses:
(1) Expenses of training special operations forces assigned to that command in
conjunction with training, and training with, armed forces and other security forces of
a friendly foreign country.
(2) Expenses of deploying such special operations forces for that training.
(3) In the case of training in conjunction with a friendly developing country, the incremental
expenses incurred by that country as the direct result of such training.
77
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
(b) Purpose of training. The primary purpose of the training for which payment may be made under
subsection (a) shall be to train the special operations forces of the combatant command.
(c) Regulations. The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe regulations for the administration of this
section. The regulations shall establish accounting procedures to ensure that the expenditures
pursuant to this section are appropriate.
(d) Definitions. In this section:
(1) The term "special operations forces" includes Civil Affairs and Military Information Special
Operations forces.
(2) The term "incremental expenses", with respect to a developing country, means the
reasonable and proper cost of rations, fuel, training ammunition, transportation, and
other goods and services consumed by such country, except that the term does not
include pay, allowances, and other normal costs of such country's personnel.
(e) Reports. Not later than April 1 of each year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a
report regarding training during the preceding fiscal year for which expenses were paid under this
section. Each report shall specify the following:
(1) All countries in which that training was conducted.
(2) The type of training conducted, including whether such training was related to
counter-narcotics or counter-terrorism activities, the duration of that training, the
number of members of the armed forces involved, and expenses paid.
(3) The extent of participation by foreign military forces, including the number and
service affiliation of foreign military personnel involved and physical and financial
contribution of each host nation to the training effort.
(4) The relationship of that training to other overseas training programs conducted by
the armed forces, such as military exercise programs sponsored by the Joint Chiefs
of Staff, military exercise programs sponsored by a combatant command, and
military training activities sponsored by a military department (including deployments
for training, short duration exercises, and other similar unit training events).
Request Procedures:
JCETs are just one type of deliberate engagement(s) that are planned at SOCEUR’s annual
Operations, Activities, and Actions (OAAs) Workshop, normally conducted in the 3rd QTR of the fiscal
year. The SOCEUR OAA Workshop is designed to identify, validate, and prioritize SOF
requirements in the EUCOM AOR. The OAA Workshop initially focuses on the re-synchronization of
the SECDEF approved 2-year plan for date shifts and force adjustments. Then the conference
focuses on developing the 3-year EUCOM SOF plan for COMSOCEUR and COMUSEUCOM
approval, to be then submitted into the Global Force Management process for SECDEF approval.
County Team representatives from the Defense Attaché Offices and Offices of Defensive
Cooperation, EUCOM Staff and Desk Officers, and SOF Force Providers are invited to this SOCEUR
led OAA Workshop.
1. EUCOM collective annual JCET timeline:
 15 OCT: SOCEUR establishes engagement priorities IAW EUCOM Strategy for Active
Security (SAS) and COMSOCEUR engagement priorities, during the SOCEUR Pre- OAA
Workshop. SOCEUR J-3 posts the availability of JCET sourcing by SOCEUR
Components (Forward Based SOF) and CONUS based SOF Units IOT meet their
training requirements while supporting the Theater Security Cooperation Activities
(TSCA) throughout the EUCOM AOR.
78
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
 10NOV: The resourcing and scheduling of proposed FY JCETs, is conducted by

SOCEUR J-3 for proposed Component and CONUS based SOF MFP-11 events during
annual SOCEUR OAA Conference.
 10 DEC: COMSOCEUR approves FY JCET events, during the SOCEUR Component
Commanders Conference.
 15 JAN: SOCEUR submits approved JCET requirements along with the rest of the
Global Force Management requirements to EUCOM in the Joint Capabilities
Requirements Manager (JCRM) database.
 20 FEB: EUCOM Force Management validates the submissions and prepares the data
for the EUCOM Global Force Management Board (GFMB).
 26 FEB: COMUSEUCOM receives the GFMB from the EUCOM Component
Commanders and once approved the data is released to Joint Staff via JCRM.
 10 APR: Joint Staff validates the Geographic Combatant Commander’s requirements,
prioritizes them and sends them to the Joint Force Providers (JFPs) for sourcing through
JCRM.
 20 APR: SOCOM conducts a GFM Requirements Conference to ensure they fully
understand the requirements, confirm the JCRM data, and prioritize sourcing.
 01AUG: SOCOM conducts a GFM Sourcing Conference, identifying which SOF
requirements were sourced for forces, the specific authorities the requirement will deploy
under, and the total funding authorized.
 15 SEP: SOCOM forwards their annual SOF JFP submission to Joint Staff in the Global
Force Management Application Program (GFMAP) SOF Annex.
 15 OCT: Joint Staff compiles and validates the JFP Annexes and drafts a complete
GFMAP for JCS Tank approval.
 01 DEC: CJCS presents the GFMAP to SECDEF for signature. The signed GFMAP is
for the next fiscal year, allowing force providers, GCCs, and Country Teams one year to
prepare for the approved.
2. EUCOM individual JCET timeline:
 4-6 Months prior to the JCET: An Initial Terms of Reference (ITOR) message is sent
via AMHS and e-mail to the Country Team, for Country Team and Host Nation
acceptance. Once the Host Nation accepts the JCET, the Human Right Vetting (HRV)
process should be initiated, which is a requirement for JCET packet submission to
SOCOM, Joint Staff staffing and the approval process within the Office of the Secretary of
Defense.
 3-5 Months prior to the JCET: The unit conducting the JCET conducts a Pre-
Deployment Sight Survey, which will develop the training plan and scope of the JCET
with the Host Nation and gain Country Team acceptance to the JCET concept.
 45-60 Days prior to the JCET: The proposal with DoS Human Rights Vetting is sent to
SOCOM, by SOCEUR.
 30-45 days prior to the JCET: SOCOM submits a notification message to Joint Staff
requesting approval of all GCC JCETs.
 30-15 days prior to the JCET: Joint Staff submits the notification message of all
deployments to the Office of the Secretary of Defense (delegated to ASD (SO/LIC) for
pre-approved JCET FTNs) for approval. SOCOM releases the DEPORD for CONUS
based forces and EXORD for theater assigned forces (We don’t get a DEPORD from
OSD, ASD, or JS any more – just the Action Memo. 15-3 days prior to the Month the
event starts: The Secretary of Defense Order’s Book (SDOB) is the approving
79
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
mechanism for all emerging JCET FTNs. The SDOB is signed twice monthly authorizing
emerging JCETs. SOCOM releases the DEPORD or EXORD as appropriate.
USEUCOM Funding History: All values are in millions of dollars and includes movement costs.
JCET FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY-17

Requested $12.000 $12.500 $13.000 $13.000 $13.000 $13.000
Allocated $9.575 $8.425 $11.225 $12.500 TBD TBD
Used $9.575 $8.425 $11.225 TBD TBD TBD
Note: Costs include both JCET engagement and movement funding.
Funding by Country/Theater: All values are in millions of dollars and includes movement costs.
Country FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY-17 FY-18

Albania $0.25 $0.00 $0.25 $0.25 $0.25 $0.25
Azerbaijan $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.55 $0.55
Bulgaria $0.30 $0.30 $0.40 $0.50 $0.50 $0.50
Croatia $0.12 $0.15 $0.13 $0.25 $0.00 $0.00
Czech Republic $0.20 $0.20 $0.20 $0.00 $0.45 $0.45
Denmark $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1.25 $0.00 $0.00
Estonia $0.60 $0.50 $0.60 $0.50 $0.7 $0.7
Finland $0.30 $0.30 $0.30 $0.00 $0.30 $0.30
Georgia $0.20 $0.20 $0.20 $0.75 $0.80 $0.80
Greece $1.50 $1.50 $1.70 $0.75 $1.20 $1.20
Hungary $0.00 $0.00 $0.10 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Israel $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Italy $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.85 $0.85
Latvia $0.10 $0.10 $0.10 $1.25 $0.7 $0.7
Lithuania $1.25 $1.25 $1.25 $0.50 $0.85 $0.85
Macedonia $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.25 $0.00 $0.00
Netherlands $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.25 $0.25
Norway $0.40 $0.40 $0.40 $1.50 $0.25 $0.25
Poland $2.30 $1.50 $3.55 $1.00 $0.45 $0.45
Romania $0.70 $0.70 $0.70 $1.25 $0.70 $0.70
Russia $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Slovakia $0.35 $0.33 $0.35 $0.00 $0.55 $0.55
Sweden $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.60 $0.60
Turkey $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.50 $1.00 $1.00
Ukraine $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
UK $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.75 $0.00 $0.00
Theater $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.25 $1.60 $1.60
TOTAL $9.575 $8.425 $11.23 $12.50 $13.00 $13.00
80
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
POC EMAIL ADDRESS

Mr. Ted Pelletier, SOCEUR J-32
theodore.f.pelletier.civ@mail.smil.mil
DSN 430-2728
81
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
JETP – Joint Exercise Transportation Program

Description:
The Joint Exercise Transportation Program (JETP) is the largest portion of the Combatant
Commanders Exercise Engagement (CE2) program. JETP funds the strategic transportation of U.S.
forces and equipment to participate in Combatant Command (CCMD) Joint Exercise Program (JEP)
exercises. JETP includes funding for airlift, sealift, commercial ticket program (CTP), port handling,
the small commercial cargo program (SCCP), and inland transportation (IT).
JETP establishes the process for CCMD participation in the Transportation Working Capital Fund
(TWCF). The TWCF provides the funding for strategic lift and port handling / inland transportation
movement costs of U.S. forces and equipment to participate in CCMD approved exercises. The
TWCF budget, managed by USTRANSCOM, is approximately $280 million dollars per year, of which
USEUCOM contributes about 10-14%.
In recent years, as USEUCOM assigned forces have migrated back to CONUS, the cost to move
training audiences and exercise control group personnel, as well as equipment in support of large
CCMD exercises has increased while JETP budget allocations have decreased dramatically.
Legal Basis:
DoD established this program in fiscal year 2008 as a result of Program Budget Decision 709
(December 2006) which consolidated joint training resources into the existing Training
Transformation (T2) portfolio and formed the CE2T2 Defense-Wide account. See CJCSI
3511.01B.
JETP FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17

Requested $43.800 $38.300 $38.400 $40.200 $39.600 $32.476 $32.099 $31.057
Allocated $39.300 $35.000 $36.000 $34.200 $35.655 $29.956 $29.200 $24.589
Used $39.300 $33.700 $31.000 $26.200 $29.376 $17.943 $26.600

United States $39.300 $33.700 $31.000 $26.200 $29.376 $17.943 $26.600
TOTAL $39.300 $33.700 $31.000 $26.200 $29.376 $17.943 $26.600
82
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Request Procedures:
JOINT EXERCISE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (JETP) FUNDING PROCESS
The chart below and the narrative on the following page describe the key elements of the JETP
process.
EUCOM ROM Cost

NATO Events Commander's Training CJCSI Projections
Guidance
Joint Training
Information
EUCOM Training
ED 55-29 Planning Conference Training Event Management Estimated
ETPC Specificaiton Form System Actual Costs
FYDP + 3-5 years (JTIMS)
(June)
EUCOM Training
Synchronization
Joint Mission Essential Defense Conference TPFDD
Task List (JMETL) Readiness ETSC
Joint Staff Estimated
Reporting System FYDP + 1-3 years
(December) Actual Costs
(DRRS)
Joint Event Life

Cycle (JELC)
Action Officers
CJCS Approved TAC Codes

Event Yes assigned to all
JOPES
CJCS approved
Exercises
TWCF
Transportation Working
No Capital Fund
Service Must
Service reported
Provide Funding
Actual Port MSC reported AMC reported
(or CIF)
Handling Inland Actual Costs Actual Costs
Transportation (post event) (post event)
(PHIT) Costs
 Directives and guidance from multiple sources are considered during the annual
USEUCOM Exercise Planning Conference (EEPC). The conference occurs each
December produces a prioritized Joint Exercise Plan to include budget constrained cost
structures for new exercises or major changes to existing events, Joint Staff approval is
requested through preparation of a Training Event Specification Form.
 Once Joint Staff has approved, an event and associated Rough Order of Magnitude
(ROM) estimated costs for strategic lift are entered into JTIMS.
 Joint Staff (assisted by USTRANSCOM) assigns Transportation Account Codes (TACs)
for each exercise. These provide “bean counters” with a means of associating
transportation funds/costs with specific exercises across multiple fiscal years.
 Joint Staff provides each CCMD with budget targets 3 years out (these often change,
sometimes even during the year of execution).
 As Action Officer/Planners carry the planning into the Joint Event Life Cycle, JOPES
entries are managed via Newsgroups and USTRANSCOM will convert “estimated
actuals” into “TPFDD estimated actuals” based upon actual data entered and validated in
JOPES.
 USTRANSCOM Components shall provide actual strategic lift expenditures. These
include Charter Air, Military Air, Commercial Sealift, Grey Bottom Sealift, Small Container
83
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Cargo Program (SCCP), and Rail movements. Unfortunately, to date, only AMC
provides timely and meaningful airlift (charter and military) execution data.
 Services/Components will continue to be responsible for planning, tracking, obtaining,
and reporting of all Commercial Ticket Program (CTP), port handling and inland
transportation costs associated with CCMD joint exercises.
 The Joint Training Information Management System (JTIMS) is the system of record for
all Joint training. Therefore, accuracy of future ROM estimates should improve as we
better capture and document our actual exercise strategic lift, CTP and PH/IT costs.
POC Email Address

LtCol Matthew Sale
matthew.r.sale.mil@mail.mil
ECJ7 JTrEx, DSN 430-4161 and
tommy.h.smith.ctr@mail.mil
Mr. Tommy Smith DSN 430-4162
84
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
MPA – Military Personnel Authorization

Terms:
AC – Active Component
ADOS – Active Duty for Operational Support
ADSW – Active Duty for Special Work
AT – Annual Tour
CO-ADOS – Contingency Active Duty for Operational Support
IDT – Inactive Duty Training
JTMD – Joint Table Mobilization Distribution
MPA-SS –Manpower Personnel Appropriation for Steady State
MPA-WE – Manpower Personnel Appropriation for War Effort
RAMP – Reserve Annual Manpower Process
RC – Reserve Component
RPA – Reserve Personnel Appropriation
Description:
MPA money is used to fund reserve support to Active Duty EUCOM missions. Each service has
unique names and rules for the MPA funds but generally there are two types: Support funded by the
RC and support funded by the AC.
RC funding uses Programmed IDT/AT to support member readiness requirements and reservist
integration with the Active Duty mission. Normally, Reservists are able to provide concurrent support
to their AC organization while they complete these requirements. Additionally, there is limited RC
funding available to assist with Special Work directly supporting RC missions.
AC funding directly supports the Active Duty missions. AC funding has two general sub-categories:
Contingency and Steady State. Contingency funds must support contingency missions (sometimes
referred to as “OCO missions”), while steady state funding can be used to support general operations
(Note: Enduring requirements should be staffed via the J1 Change Manpower Package (CMP)).
RAMP Request Procedures:

Designated liaisons in each directorate called Reserve Liaison Officers (RLOs) consolidate long-term
RC manpower requirements and submit via the Task Management Tool (TMT) to the RAMP
manager in ECJ1-SR. Each requirement includes a brief position description, requested dates, rank
criteria, security clearance restrictions, skill set requirements and service preferences. Once
requirements are prioritized by the Deputy Directors and approved by the EUCOM Chief of Staff, the
list is provided to the Directorates and ECJ1-SR for advertising and candidate selection. Directorate
representatives must coordinate with ECJ1-SR for advertising approved requirements, selection of
candidates, and orders execution.
85
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Manpower allocation types are indicated in the table below. Funding categories, nomenclature, and
amounts vary by service. Service specific business rules change frequently - coordination with the
Service fund manager is essential.
Active Component Funding Reserve Component

Funding
Reserve
Contingency Steady State Programmed
Special Work
CO-ADOS/
Army ADOS* IDT & AT ADSW*
Mobilization
Air Force MPA-WE* MPA-SS* IDT & AT RPA*
ADSW/
Navy ADSW*/ADT IDT & AT ADSW*/ADT
Mobilization
* Orders for less than 180 days require local funding for travel & per diem reimbursement
Non-JTMD/non-mobilization requirements are prioritized annually by the EUCOM Deputy
Directors via the RAMP. All Directorates, Special Staff Offices, Divisions and Branches at
EUCOM are able to request RC individual manning support through the RAMP. RC manning
support funded under the Active Component Funding heading in the table above can be
applied to any HQ US EUCOM mission.
Reserve Entitlements
Operations and Maintenance (O&M) funding is often a limiting factor in MPA support requests.
Generally, if the Reservist does not live locally and the tour is less than 179 days, the supported
Directorate must provide funds to pay the Reservist’s travel and per diem expenses.
(Note: To streamline reimbursements, EUCOM organizations must add Reservists on orders longer
than 30 days to the Directorate’s Defense Travel Systems (DTS) Profile.
The Army, Navy, and Air Force Reserves provide partial PCS entitlements for orders exceeding 179
days. In this setup, the member is eligible for Overseas Housing Allowance (OHA), Cost of Living
Allowance (COLA), Family Separation Allowance (FSA), and stateside Basic Allowance for Housing
(BAH) funded by the respective service, rather than local lodging, per diem and travel expense
reimbursement from a EUCOM directorate. Although PCS status minimizes Directorate O&M
expenditures, the reduced compensation may negatively impact the Reservist’s decision to
volunteer.
Legal Basis: DoD Financial Management Regulation, DoD 7000.14-R, Vol. 2A, Ch. 2.

POC: CAPT Rodney Turbak, ECJ1-S, DSN 430-4189 rodney.l.turbak.mil@mail.mil
86
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
PDP – Partnership Development Program

Description: Funding for activities designed to further a country’s SOF organizational structure,
capability development, and enable support for Coalition SOF Operations. Target countries include
NATO and Partner Nations that have signed the NATO Partnership for Peace framework document.
In 2009 OSD issued Program Budget Decision (PBD) 708 establishing PDP as a POR.
Legal Basis:
Funding primarily uses the following authorities:
 10 USC § 2010, in order to defray the expenses a developing country incurs from
participation in US exercises & funds for incremental expenses-ammo, rations, fuel &
transportation.
 10 USC § 1051 in order to defray the expenses a developing country incurs from
participating in a meeting, conference, seminar, or similar event in which the US is
participating.
Limitation: Without additional train and equip authorities, country development will require additional
years to successfully execute, increasing both financial costs long-term and operational limitations to
execute missions in the AOR.
Request Procedures:
PDPs are just one type of deliberate engagement(s) that are planned at SOCEUR’s annual
Operations, Activities, and Actions (OAAs) Workshop, normally conducted in the 3rd QTR of the fiscal
year. The SOCEUR OAA Workshop is designed to identify, validate, and prioritize SOF
requirements in the EUCOM AOR. The OAA Workshop initially focuses on the re-synchronization of
the SECDEF approved 2-year plan for date shifts and force adjustments. Then the conference
focuses on developing the 3-year EUCOM SOF plan for COMSOCEUR and COMUSEUCOM
approval, to be then submitted into the Global Force Management process for SECDEF approval.
County Team representatives from the Defense Attaché Offices and Offices of Defensive
Cooperation, EUCOM Staff and Desk Officers, and SOF Force Providers are invited to this SOCEUR
led OAA Workshop.
3. EUCOM collective annual PDP timeline:
 15OCT: SOCEUR establishes engagement priorities IAW EUCOM Strategy for Active
Security (SAS) and COMSOCEUR engagement priorities, during the SOCEUR Pre- OAA
Workshop. SOCEUR J-8 notifies COMSOCEUR of the availability of PDP funding.
SOCEUR J-3 advises COMSOCEUR of projected availability of Forces by both
SOCEUR Components (Forward Based SOF) and CONUS based SOF Units IOT meet
their training requirements while supporting the Theater Security Cooperation (TSC)
Activities throughout the EUCOM AOR.
 10NOV: The resourcing and scheduling of proposed FY PDPs, is conducted by
SOCEUR J-3 for proposed Component and CONUS based SOF events during annual
SOCEUR OAA Conference.
 10 DEC: COMSOCEUR approves FY PDP events, during the SOCEUR Component
Commanders Conference.
87
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
 15 JAN: SOCEUR submits approved PDP requirements along with the rest of the Global
Force Management requirements to EUCOM in the Joint Capabilities Requirements
Manager (JCRM) database.
 20 FEB: EUCOM Force Management validates the submissions and prepares the data
for the EUCOM Global Force Management Board (GFMB).
 26 FEB: COMUSEUCOM receives the GFMB from the EUCOM Component
Commanders and once approved the data is released to Joint Staff via JCRM.
 10 APR: Joint Staff validates the Geographic Combatant Commander’s requirements,
prioritizes them and sends them to the Joint Force Providers (JFPs) for sourcing through
JCRM.
 20 APR: SOCOM conducts a GFM Requirements Conference to ensure they fully
understand the requirements, confirm the JCRM data, and prioritize sourcing.
 01AUG: SOCOM conducts a GFM Sourcing Conference, identifying which SOF
requirements were sourced for forces, the specific authorities the requirement will deploy
under, and the total funding authorized.
 15 SEP: SOCOM forwards their annual SOF JFP submission to Joint Staff in the Global
Force Management Application Program (GFMAP) SOF Annex.
 15 OCT: Joint Staff compiles and validates the JFP Annexes and drafts a complete
GFMAP for JCS Tank approval.
 01 DEC: CJCS presents the GFMAP to SECDEF for signature. The signed GFMAP is
for the next fiscal year, allowing force providers, GCCs, and Country Teams one year to
prepare for the approved.
PDP FY13 FY14 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

Requested $14.80 $16.40 $16.40 $14.00 $17.00 $17.00 $17.00
Allocated $10.60 $10.93 $10.93 $9.95* $13.10* $13.10* $13.10*
Obligated $10.60 $10.93 $10.93 $9.95* $13.10* TBD TBD
 * Starting in FY-15; EUCOM MPF-2 PDP allocations include $5.0M of OCO Funding
 EUCOM J-5/8 acknowledges SOCEUR PDP requirements exceed $17M, but has stated funding
allocations will not exceed $13.1M annually, IAW approved GCC Spend Plans.

Albania $0.80 $0.80 $0.20 $0.00 $1.00 $1.00
Azerbaijan $0.22 $0.22 $0.20 $0.00 $0.50 $0.50
Bosnia-Herz N/A N/A N/A $0.20 $0.25 $0.25
Bulgaria $0.02 $0.02 $0.10 $0.05 $1.50 $1.50
Croatia $0.04 $0.04 $0.00 $0.50 $0.50 $0.50
Czech Rep $0.47 $0.47 $0.40 $0.00 $0.50 $0.50
Denmark N/A N/A N/A $0.30 $0.00 $0.00
88
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Estonia $0.63 $0.63 $1.20 $0.20 $0.00 $0.00

France N/A N/A N/A $0.05 $0.00 $0.00
Georgia N/A N/A N/A $0.05 $0.50 $0.50
Greece $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.25 $1.50 $1.50
Hungary $1.21 $1.21 $1.20 $0.05 $0.50 $0.50
Kosovo N/A N/A N/A $0.05 $0.05 $0.05
Latvia $0.34 $0.34 $0.40 $0.80 $0.50 $0.50
Lithuania $0.75 $0.75 $1.20 $1.40 $0.50 $0.50
Norway N/A N/A N/A $0.50 $0.00 $0.00
Poland $1.42 $1.42 $1.20 $0.70 $1.00 $1.00
Romania $0.55 $0.88 $1.20 $0.50 $1.00 $1.00
Slovakia $0.48 $0.48 $0.45 $0.00 $0.50 $0.50
Turkey $0.03 $0.03 $0.20 $0.00 $0.50 $0.50
Ukraine N/A N/A N/A $0.50 $0.50 $0.50
Theater $3.64 $3.64 $2.00 $7.00 $1.80 $1.80
TOTAL $10.60* $10.93* $9.95* $13,1* $13,1* $13,1*
POC EMAIL ADDRESS

Mr. Ted Pelletier, SOCEUR J-32
theodore.f.pelletier.civ@mail.smil.mil
DSN 430-2728
89
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Section 1203 – General Purpose Training

Legal Basis/Authorization.
 Section 1203 of NDAA FY 14
Description. Training of General Purpose U.S. Forces with Friendly Foreign Nations. General
purpose forces of the U.S. Armed Forces may train with the military forces or other security forces of
a friendly foreign country if the Secretary of Defense determines that it is in the national security
interests of the United States to do so. Training may be conducted under Section 1203 only with the
prior approval of the Secretary of Defense. Before conducting a training event in or with a foreign
country under Section 1203 authority, the Secretary of Defense must seek the concurrence of the
Secretary of State. CJCSM 3511.01, 26 May 15, Appendix E to Enclosure B provides detailed
criteria for use. See also, Secretary of Defense Memorandum, SUBJECT: Policy, Responsibilities,
and Interim Procedures regarding Section 2013 of the NDAA for FY 2014, dated 28 May 2014.
Program Criteria. IAW FY 2014 NDAA Section 1203 (b), training conducted by U.S. Armed Forces
under the provisions of Section 1203 must, to the maximum extent practical:
 Support the mission essential tasks for which the training unit providing such training is
responsible;
 Be with a foreign unit or organization with equipment that is functionally similar to such training
unit; and
 Include elements that promote observance of and respect for human rights and fundamental
freedoms; and respect for legitimate civilian authority within the foreign country or countries
concerned.
Country Criteria. DoD does not impose any eligibility criteria to determine if a country is eligible for
Section 1203 assistance as a friendly foreign country. However, the Office of the Secretary of
Defense (OSD) may not approve training with certain countries under Section 1203 authority for
various policy reasons.
Limits of Authority. Section 1203 authority is for the specific combination of training event, event
location, participating country(ies), gross amount of support to be provided and fiscal year.
 Approval in one fiscal year does not mean the combination of training event, event location,
country(ies), and amount of support is cleared for subsequent years.
 A change of location, the addition of a country(ies), or an increase in the gross amount of support
to be provided will require a resubmission of the entire proposed requirement.
 CCMDs must notify the Joint Staff J7 of certain changes to a previously approved event to
ensure Congress is properly notified: country no longer participating, postponement,
rescheduling, cancellation, and decrease in amount of support.
Congressional Notification. OSD must notify Congress no later than 15 days prior to the start of a
training event.
Post-Event Financial Reporting. CCMDs will report to Joint Staff actual expenditures for
incremental expenses of friendly foreign countries for each approved Section 1203 training event
within 45 days of event completion, or within 15 days of receipt of such information from their Service
components (whichever occurs earlier).
90
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
 In the initial Request for Authority submission, CCMDs should make a reasonable estimate on
the amount of expenditures for incremental expenses prior to the event start date. For post-event
financial reporting purposes, CCMDs must include in their After Action Report a revision their
initial Request for Authority submission, reflecting actual U.S. and friendly foreign country troop
participation, expenditures, financial and physical contributions, and resubmit the revision to the
Joint Staff.
 Additional or supplementary information may be required as the Section 1203 program is refined.
Annual Report to Congress. On 1 April each year, OSD must report all training events completed
in the previous completed fiscal year. CCMDs will submit data to the Joint Staff for the annual Report
to Congress NLT 15 January for the expenditures of the previous fiscal year. Joint Staff will provide
CCMDs detailed instructions for annual reporting requirements in early December.
Funding. Section 1203 grants authority to expend no more than $10M total across all CCMDs per
fiscal year. 1203 does not come with funding, only authority for training.
 OSD will actively monitor usage, moderate under/over-usage across CCMDs, and hold some
authority in reserve to accommodate emergent, unforeseen requirements.
 Section 1203 provides CCMDs the authority to use O&M appropriations; it does not provide
additional funding. O&M appropriations funds are programmed and dispensed by the CCMD
Office Conducting the Exercise (Services Components). It is CCMD responsibility to coordinate
Section 1203 funding with their Service Component.
 1203 can pay for country’s incremental expenses directly resulting from its participation in
an approved exercise with the U.S. which includes reasonable and proper cost of goods and
services used by a developing country as a direct result of that country‘s participation.
Categories for these expenses include: Fuel, ammunition, transportation and associated
services at the exercise location, travel to and from the exercise location, interpreters, life
support (lodging, meals and rations, and sanitation)
 1203 is not permitted to pay for U.S. personnel pay and allowance. 1203 is also not
permitted to pay for host nation‘s participating forces personnel pay and allowances or per
diem.
 The authority under this section may not be exercised after September 30, 2017.
Training Authorized: General purpose forces of the United States Armed Forces may train with the
military forces or other security forces of a friendly foreign country if the Secretary of Defense
determines that it is in the national security interests of the United States to do so and to the
maximum extent practical:
 Support the mission essential tasks for which the training unit providing such training is
responsible.
 Be with a foreign unit or organization with equipment that is functionally similar to such training
unit; and
 Include elements that promote observance of and respect for human rights and fundamental
freedoms and respect for legitimate civilian authority within the foreign country or countries
concerned.
Proposal Submission.
 There is no annual submission of Section 1203 requirements. CCMDs must submit their
quarterly out of cycle proposals to the Joint Staff 60-days prior to the beginning of the quarter.
Components must submit their requirements to ECJ7 30-days prior to the Joint Staff suspense
for legal review and processing.
91
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
 FY Q1 (1 Oct – 31 Dec): due to ECJ7 on 1Jun; due to JS/J7 on 1Jul

 FY Q2 (1 Jan – 31 Mar): due to ECJ7 on 1 Sep; due to JS/J7 on 1 Oct
 FY Q3 (1 Apr – 30 Jun): due to ECJ7 on 1 Dec; due to JS/J7 on 1 Jan
 FY Q4 (1 Jul – 30 Sep): due to ECJ7 on 1 Mar; due to JS/J7 on 1 Apr
 Section 1203 proposals received less than 90-days prior to the CND must be accompanied by a
GO/FO signed memorandum explaining the circumstances of the late submission.
Request Procedures: All requests must be submitted 1203 template form. Required information:
 Identify the GCC requesting 1203 authority.

 Identify the FY Section 1203 authority will be used in.
 Provide the name of the training event and the series number if applicable.
 If applicable, identify the Service/Sub-Component(s) hosting or supporting.
 List the location(s) of training event execution only.
 Identify the type of the training event.
 Identify if the event will be held with one country only or with more than one country.
 Identify how often the event is held.
 Identify if the training event has a relationship to other overseas training programs conducted by
the United States Armed Forces, e.g. military exercise programs sponsored by the JS, a
Combatant Command, or a military department (including deployments for training, short duration
exercises, and other similar unit training events).
 Identify the main training objective of the event.
 Briefly describe the training scenario.
 Provide actual or projected start and end dates.
 PNs receiving assistance.
 Provide the number of PN participants (for which authority is requested for) and their roles during
the training event execution.
 Only list full dollar amount and estimate at least to the nearest $1,000.
 Critical Need Date (CND) is defined as the date by when the requesting GCC must know if 1203
authority is granted.
 To highlight that the training event is undertaken primarily to enhance U.S. security interests, list
the main strategic, operational, and tactical training event objectives that enhance U.S. security
interests. If the training benefit derived by the friendly foreign country is in the U.S. security
interests, describe it.
 Identify the primary U.S. unit(s) that will be trained.
 To highlight that the training event benefits the U.S. training audience, list the unit Mission
Essential Tasks (METs) that are being trained. METs may include providing Security Force
Assistance (SFA) and/or Building Partner Capacity (BPC).
 Identify the PN unit(s), number of participating personnel, and financial contribution(s) to the
training event.
 The PN unit name/Service should show that the participating U.S. and friendly foreign troops are
functionally similar. If it does not, provide additional information to highlight the similarity. If they
are not functionally similar, provide an explanation.
 Identify the PN(s) physical contribution(s).
 This can be answered in one sentence. Do not elaborate on the impact to the PN.
 Identify if the training event would be cancelled or less effective if the PN(s) would cancel or
degrade participation in the training event.
 Identify the impact the lack of 1203 assistance to the PN(s) would have on U.S. security interests
and readiness objectives.
92
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
 Leahy Vetting. Initiated by the U.S. Embassy of the PN participating.

 The authority to approve on behalf of the Chief of Mission can be delegated to a representative
such as the Defense Attaché since s/he is the senior military representative at the embassy.
 Each proposal must be reviewed by a judge advocate or civilian attorney from the requesting
GCC. The proposal will include the review date and identify the responsible judge advocate or
civilian attorney who provided the legal review.
 Each proposal must be reviewed and approved by an O-6/GS-15 GCC HQ staff member. The
proposal will include the approval date and identify the GCC O-6/GS-15 representative.
Section 1203 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17
Requested $ 4.100 $5.093
Allocated $2.882 $6.582
Obligated $2.882 $6.582
POC Email address

LtCol Matt Sale
ECJ7 JTrEx, DSN 430-4161 matther.r.sale.mil@smil.mail.mil
Mr. Michael Burke michael.j.burke24.ctr@mail.mil
ECJ7 JTrEx, DSN 430-7048
93
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Section 1207 – Loan of Personnel Protection and Personnel

Survivability Equipment
Description:
The United States agrees to loan personnel protection and personnel survivability equipment for the
use of such equipment by military forces of a nation participating in the following:
(1) Combined operations with the United States in Afghanistan

(2) Combined operations with the United States in Iraq, Lebanon, and Jordan to counter the Islamic
State in Iraq and the Levant
(3) Other contingency operations or peacekeeping operations under the Charter of the United
Nations or other international agreements (considered on a case-by-case basis)
(4) Training of such forces in connection with the deployment of such forces to be deployed to an
operation described in paragraph (1) or (2).
1207 authority permits loans of the following type of equipment for pre-deployment training for
ally/partner nation forces who meet one of the above requirements:
• Military vehicles designed to accommodate crew-served weapons for convoy security

operations (MRAPs)
• Up-Armored HMMWVs
• Add-on armor kits
• Command, control, and communications systems (BFT, radios)
• Crew served weapons .50 caliber and below for convoy/base camp security operations
• C-IED devices other than classified systems
Additional considerations:
• Loaned equipment stays at home station (does NOT deploy).
• Secretary of Defense must determine that US Forces in the operation have no unfulfilled
requirements for the equipment.
• Equipment must be sourced out of existing US inventory (EUCOM Component or Service)
• Equipment item is loaned under an ACSA for a period of one year (can be renewed), but not
longer than the duration of the country’s participation in the coalition operation.
• Return of item less normal wear and tear = replacement in kind
• The country borrowing the equipment is typically responsible for
• Transportation of item from current location to/from country
• Maintenance of equipment during loan period
Main program implementation steps at EUCOM are:
1. Identify required item(s) and acceptable substitutes (ODC and ECJ5/8)

2. Obtain signed 1207 Implementing Agreement (ECJ4, ECJ5 ODC EUCOM Component)
3. Task feasibility of support (FOS) to EUCOM Components (EPOC, ECJ4, ECJ5/8)
4. If EUCOM Components cannot source, submit Coalition Operational Needs Statement
(CONS) to JS/J4 for global sourcing (ECJ5/8)
5. Once items sourced, determine transportation/maintenance costs associated with loan of
equipment (ECJ4, EUCOM Component)
6. Obtain Deputy Commander’s Determination (no unfilled EUCOM requirements) (ECJ5/8)
7. Develop and submit Congressional Notification package to JS/J4; once SECDEF submits
94
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
report to Congress, wait 15 days before executing the transaction (ECJ5/8)

8. Develop ACSA order for items to be loaned (ECJ4, EUCOM Component)
9. Execute transfer (hand receipt) of equipment items to Ally/partner nation (ECJ4, EUCOM
Component)
10. Submit annual report on loaned equipment to JS/J4 (ECJ5/8 and ODC, ECJ4, EUCOM
Component )
Legal Basis:
Section 1207 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. ‘Buck’ McKeon National Defense Authorization Act
(NDAA) for FY2015, Rules Committee Print 113-58, House Amendment to the Text of S. 1847. Use
of this authority is dependent upon having a valid agreement pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 2342
(Acquisition and Cross-Servicing Agreement).
POCs Email Address
MAJ John-Michael Insetta, ECJ5-SCP, 430-6834 john.m.insetta.mil@mail.mil
Anthony Munson, ECJ4 430-4509 anthony.r.munson.civ@mail.mil
95
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Section 1250 – Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative (USAI)

Description:
Section1250 of the FY16 NDAA, Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative, authorized $300million to
provide assistance and sustainment to the military and other security forces of Ukraine. Of the $300
million, $50 million was made available only for specified defensive lethal assistance, to include
counter-artillery radars. Up to 20 percent of the amount authorized ($60 million) could be used to
support training pursuant to Section 1207, NDAA FY2012 (Global Contingency Security Fund). The
authority under section 1250 expires December 31, 2017. A total of $250 million was actually
appropriated against this authority.
Section1250 USAI is a specific legal authority and is not to be confused with the broad FY16
security assistance effort sometimes collectively referred to as “USAI.” In addition to $250 million in
Section 1250 funds, the aggregate U.S. security assistance to Ukraine in FY16 includes, $85
million in Foreign Military Financing (FMF) and $23.4 million in Global Security Contingency Fund
(GSCF).
Legal Basis:
Section 1250, FY2016 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), Public Law 114-92
Future funding:
As this publication goes to press, the USAI authority is written into both the House and Senate
versions of the NDAA for FY2017.
 Section 1235 of the House version of the FY17 NDAA, HR 4909, would make non-
substantive changes to the provision. In a separate provision, HR 4909 would authorize $150
million in support of the initiative.
 Section 1231 of the Senate version of the FY17 NDAA, S 2943, would (1) extend the
authority to September 30, 2019; and (2) authorize $500 million in support of the initiative.
The final status of the authority and funding is contingent upon the reconciliation of the two bills in
Congress and presidential approval.
Request Procedures:
Funds allocation is coordinated through the Multinational Joint Commission – Ukraine (MJCU)
secretariat. Proposals are generated by functional area and service subcommittees, prioritized by
the Executive Committee (EC), and adjudicated by the MJC-U governing body.
 Maritime Forces Professional Military Development

 Operational Logistics Capacity
 C4 Interoperability
 SOF Operations, Actions, and Activities
 Air Ops Spt, Maintenance, and Logistics Capacity
 Combined Air Ops Interoperability, Deployability, Std
96
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
 Combined Land Forces Capability, Interoperability, Deployability
Section 1250 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19

Appropriated $250.00
Allocated $231.28
Section1250 Funding by Country: All values are in millions of dollars

Ukraine $231.28
TOTAL $231.28
POC Email Address
Mr. Tigran Mikaelian, ECJ5-SCP, 430-2089 tigran.mikaelian.ctr@mail.mil
97
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Section 1251 – Eastern European Training Initiative (EETI)

Description:
Authorized under Section 1251 of the FY16 NDAA, the Eastern European Training Initiative (EETI) is
a new program in FY17 that supports security assistance level (“Big T”) training for Eastern European
Allies and partners to build their capacity to participate in US or NATO-led coalition operations,
respond to hybrid threats, conduct territorial defense, and/or support NATO collective defense.
Section 1251(EETI) is authorized for the following countries: Bulgaria, Croatia, Estonia, Hungary,
Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia. In accordance with Section 1251(c),
additions to the existing country eligibility list must be coordinated with the Office of Secretary of the
Defense and the Joint Staff, and submitted to Congress.
Section 1251 authority effectively “upgrades” the interaction between U.S. and participating
Ally/partner nation forces in multilateral exercises from familiarization/ interoperability (“little t”) to
training that builds operational capability, capacity, and readiness (“Big T”). Training provided to
participating Ally/partner nation forces must be comparable to or complementary of the types of
training US Armed Forces receive in the course of the multilateral exercise. Unlike other authorities
(10 USC Section 2011, Section 1203 of the FY14 NDAA), training provided under Section 1251
authority is primarily for the benefit of the Ally/partner nation force receiving the training vice US
forces conducting the training.
EETI leverages already planned and funded US rotational presence (e.g., Operation ATLANTIC
RESOLVE, Black Sea Rotational Force) and multilateral exercises (e.g., Joint Exercise Program
events, Component/SOCEUR exercises, unit level exercises) in Eastern Europe to deliver training to
eligible Allies and/or partners. There are no restrictions on which DoD service components or
component commands can deliver Section 1251 training. This includes previously planned
Ally/partner nation participation in these exercises, which may be already authorized and funded by
other programs (e.g., Section 2010/Developing Country Combined Exercise Program). As a result,
the provision of training to eligible Ally/partner nation forces should not typically involve any additional
costs.
IF there are additional US costs to provide training (e.g., additional US personnel required or
extending the duration of the exercise to conduct training, training aids), the Component conducting
the training will ordinarily be expected to fund those costs out of Operations & Maintenance (O&M).
EETI will support the incremental Ally/partner nation costs of receiving training over and above those
exercise participation costs that are already funded, whether by US or national funds. Such costs
include, for example, additional real life support (billeting, meals) to enable Ally/partner nation
personnel to extend their participation in an exercise in order to receive training. Requirements to
support training of Ally/partner nation forces outside already planned/funded exercises, including
exercises outside the host nation, will also be considered on a case by case basis.
In accordance with Section 1251(d)(2), EETI is funded by EUCOM Headquarters O&M. Request for
approval for event proposals are reviewed and managed through the Concept Funding Request
(CFR) in EUCOM’s TSC Event Management System. Special CFR instructions for CFR input will be
provided by the USEUCOM points of contact. The Director ECJ5/8 is approving authority for Section
1251. Foreign Military units and personnel must be Leahy Vetted in accordance with standard
country practice prior to the provision of any training under Section 1251.
98
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Legal Basis:
(a) AUTHORITY.—The Secretary of Defense may provide the training specified in subsection (b),
and pay the incremental expenses incurred by a country as the direct result of participation in
such training, for the national military forces provided for under subsection (c).
(b) TYPES OF TRAINING.—The training provided to the national military forces of a country under
subsection (a) shall be limited to training that is—
(1) provided in the course of the conduct of a multilateral exercise in which the United States
Armed Forces are a participant;
(2) comparable to or complementary of the types of training the United States Armed Forces
receive in the course of such multilateral exercise; and
(3) for any purpose as follows:
(A) To enhance and increase the interoperability of the military forces to be trained to
increase their ability to participate in coalition efforts led by the United States or
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO).
(B) To increase the capacity of such military forces to respond to external threats.
(C) To increase the capacity of such military forces to respond to hybrid warfare.
(D) To increase the capacity of such military forces to respond to calls for collective
action within the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
(c) ELIGIBLE COUNTRIES.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—Training may be provided under subsection (a) to the national military
forces of the countries determined by the Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of
the Secretary of State, to be appropriate recipients of such training from among the
countries as follows:
(A) Countries that are a signatory to the Partnership for Peace Framework
Documents, but not a member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization
(B) Countries that became a member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization after
January 1, 1999.
(2) ELIGIBLE COUNTRIES.— Before providing training under subsection (a), the Secretary
of Defense shall, in coordination with the Secretary of State, submit to the Committees on
Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a list of the countries
determined pursuant to paragraph (1) to be eligible for the provision of training under
subsection (a).
(d) FUNDING OF INCREMENTAL EXPENSES.—
(1) ANNUAL FUNDING.—Of the amounts specified in paragraph (2) for a fiscal year, up to a
total of $28,000,000 may be used to pay incremental expenses under subsection (a) in
that fiscal year.
(2) AMOUNTS.—The amounts specified in this paragraph are as follows:
(A) Amounts authorized to be appropriated for a fiscal year for operation and
maintenance, Army, and available for the Combatant Commands Direct Support
Program for that fiscal year.
(B) Amounts authorized to be appropriated for a fiscal year for operation and
maintenance, Defense-wide, and available for the Wales Initiative Fund for that
fiscal year.
(3) AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR ACTIVITIES ACROSS FISCAL YEARS.—Amounts
available in a fiscal year pursuant to this subsection may be used for incremental
expenses of training that begins in that fiscal year and ends in the next fiscal year.
(e) BRIEFING TO CONGRESS ON USE OF AUTHORITY.—Not later than 90 days after the end of
each fiscal year in which the authority in subsection (a) is used, the Secretary shall brief the
Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives on the use of the
99
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
authority during such fiscal year, including each country with which training under the authority was
conducted and the types of training provided.
(f) CONSTRUCTION OF AUTHORITY.—The authority provided in subsection (a) is in addition to
any other authority provided by law authorizing the provision of training for the national military forces
of a foreign country, including section 2282 of title 10, United States Code.
(g) INCREMENTAL EXPENSES DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘incremental expenses’’
means the reasonable and proper cost of the goods and services that are consumed by a country as
a direct result of that country’s participation in training under the authority of this section, including
rations, fuel, training ammunition, and transportation. Such term does not include pay, allowances,
and other normal costs of a country’s personnel.
(h) TERMINATION OF AUTHORITY.— The authority under this section shall terminate on
September 30, 2017. Any activity under this section initiated before that date may be completed, but
only using funds available for fiscal years 2016 through 2017.
 Combined Land Forces Capability/Interoperability/Deployability

 Land Operations Capacity and Capability
 SOF Operations, Actions, and Activities
 Combined Air Operations Interoperability/Deployability/Standardization
 Air Operations, Maintenance, and Logistics Capacity
 Combined Maritime Interoperability/Deployability/Standardization
 Prepare Military Forces for Expeditionary Operations,
EETI Funding by Country: All values are in millions of dollars and reflect obligated funds

Bulgaria 0.0
Croatia 0.0
Estonia 0.0
Hungary 0.0
Latvia 0.0
Lithuania 0.0
Poland 0.0
Romania 0.0
Slovakia 0.0
Slovenia 0.0
TOTAL 0.0
POC Email Address

Mr. Rafael Bonoan, ECJ5-S, 430-7556 rafael.r.bonoan.ctr@mail.smil.mil
MAJ Mark Caudillo, ECJ5-S, 430-2288 mark.s.caudillo2.mil@mail.mil
100
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Section 2282 – Authority to Build the Capacity of Foreign

Security Forces
Description:
NDAA FY15, Section 1205, codified the authority of the Secretary of Defense, with concurrence by
the Secretary of State, to conduct or support a program or programs in 10 U.S.C. §2282 as follows:
1. To build the capacity of a foreign country’s national military (MoD) forces in order for that
country to conduct counterterrorism operations OR participate in or support on-going allied or
coalition military or stability operations that benefit the national security interests of the United
States.
2. To build the capacity of a foreign country’s national maritime or border security forces (MoD
or non-MoD) to conduct counterterrorism operations.
3. To build the capacity of a foreign country’s national-level security forces (non-MoD) that have
among their functional responsibilities a counterterrorism mission in order for such forces to conduct
counterterrorism operations.
Section 2282 is limited to $350 million annually, and not more than $150 million per year may be
used to support on-going allied or coalition military or stability operations. Section 2282 is intended
to address urgent and/or emergent threats and the requirements to counter those threats and uses
the pseudo-FMS process to that end.
Section 2282 can:

 Provide training, equipment, defense services, and supplies to eligible partner nations
 Train and equip MoD forces for counterterrorism or military or stability operations
 Train and equip non-MoD forces to conduct counterterrorism operations
 Pay for small-scale military construction projects (maximum of $750K per proposal, per year).
Contact USEUCOM Section 2282 POC to discuss MILCON prior to proposal submission.
Section 2282 cannot:

 Provide direct funding to partner nations (like FMF)
 Directly support Afghan, Iraqi, Syrian, or Pakistani security forces
 Lift partner troops or equipment to theater
 Loan equipment
 Pay for major construction
Section 2282 Time Constraints:

 Funds must be obligated by 30 September of the fiscal year in which they are made available
(1 year money)
 Funds available at the time a program begins may be used for supplies, training, and defense
services associated with new equipment in the fiscal year in which the equipment is
delivered and in the next fiscal year
 Foreign countries should not expect equipment deliveries for12-18 months after funding is
notified and approved by Congress
101
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Legal Basis:
10 U.S.C. §2282.

 SOF Operations, Actions and Activities (OAAs)
 Air Ops, Maintenance and Logistics Capacity
 Combined Air Ops Interoperability/Deployable/Standardization
 Combined Land Forces Interoperability/Deploy/Standardization
 Land Operations Capacity and Capability
 Intelligence Security Cooperation
 C4 Interoperability
 Aviation C4I Interoperability
Section 1206 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15* FY16 FY17
Requested $106.00 $130.20 $104.60 $113.66 $132.00 $65.700 N/A N/A
Allocated $75.459 $86.656 $100.26 $95.170 $96.810 $18.550 N/A N/A
Used $65.756 $66.836 $84.837 $85.489 $81.726 $0.00 N/A N/A
*Section 1206 was replaced with Section 2282 in December 2014, which occurred after FY15 Tranche 1 was already notified under
1206. All remaining FY15 1206 programs were rolled over to 2282.
Section 2282 FY15** FY16 FY17

Requested $29.705 $65.656 $65.583
Allocated $27.462 $54.070 TBD
Used TBD TBD TBD
**Amounts reflect 1206 proposals that were rolled over to 2282. They also do not reflect European Reassurance Initiative (ERI)
proposals or Turkey CTPF proposal.
102
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Section 1206 Funding by Country: All values are in millions of dollars and reflect obligated funds

Albania $0.242 $0.305 $0.911 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Azerbaijan $0.00 $9.119 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Bulgaria $1.707 $0.623 $4.129 $7.213 $18.092 $0.00 $0.00
Croatia $5.148 $5.115 $5.856 $5.432 $9.179 $0.00 $0.00
Czech Republic $0.00 $10.780 $3.280 $16.863 $8.392 $0.00 $0.00
Estonia $5.003 $2.639 $4.960 $4.034 $3.314 $0.00 $0.00
Georgia $18.484 $18.758 $2.835 $0.075 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Hungary $8.181 $2.902 $11.967 $7.727 $2.326 $0.00 $0.00
Latvia $2.511 $6.346 $2.829 $5.150 $11.449 $0.00 $0.00
Lithuania $2.290 $3.883 $12.477 $8.530 $10.012 $0.00 $0.00
Malta $0.00 $1.568 $1.250 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Poland $10.180 $1.569 $15.819 $10.766 $0.951 $0.00 $0.00
Romania+ $10.640 $2.559 $17.875 $9.790 $19.165 $18.550 $0.00
Slovakia $0.093 $0.275 $0.305 $9.909 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Slovenia $0.221 $0.395 $0.344 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Ukraine $0.056 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
TOTAL $65.756 $66.836 $84.837 $85.489 $81.726 $18.550 $0.00
+Romania was the only FY15 Section 1206 program notified to Congress before Section 2282 was signed into law. These funds
have not been obligated yet.
Section 2282 Funding by Country: All values are in millions of dollars and reflect requested
funds
Country FY15++ FY16

Albania $0.00 $1.600
BiH $0.00 $0.337
Bulgaria $2.360 $5.900
Czech Rep $0.00 $10.5
Estonia $2.923 $0.00
Georgia $0.00 $5.900
Greece $0.00 $1.700
Hungary $7.220 $14.74
Latvia $11.065 $0.00
Lithuania $5.180 $0.00
Romania 18.550 $8.700
Serbia $0.00 $0.337
Slovakia $0.00 $3.700
Slovenia $0.00 $0.342
103
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Request Procedures:
2282 process and timeline:

 NLT January: ODCs/Components begin identifying capability gaps and developing proposal
concepts
 February: OSD/EUCOM issue formal proposal guidance and proposal templates
 April: Initial proposals addressing ODC/Component-identified capability gaps are submitted
to EUCOM for strategy review and prioritization
o A complete 2282 proposal submission includes the following:
 Proposal Submission Form
 Equipment List (NSN level detail)
 Unit Type Assessment Framework (baseline unit assessment)
 Country Team Assessment for all NVDs, Type 1 crypto, and all other
equipment requiring release
 Ambassador Concurrence Cable
o All proposals, regardless of originating organization, must come to EUCOM through
the applicable ODC
 May: Initial EUCOM proposals are submitted to JS/OSD/DoS for review, feedback, and
prioritization
 June – July: Final proposal refinement between EUCOM and ODC/Components
 August – September: Final proposals are submitted to the JS for review and distribution to
OSD, DoS, DSCA, and SOCOM
 October: Selected proposals are sent to SecDef for final approval and SecState for
concurrence
 November/December: Tranche 1 notification to Congress
 January/February: Tranche 2 notification to Congress
 June: Tranche 3 notification to Congress
 No planning/projects can begin nor promises be made to partner nations until
Congress authorizes the funding
Program Assessments:
In accordance with the Section 1206 Assessment Handbook (Nov 2013), Section 1206 programs
shall be assessed by OSD and/or the CCMD within 6-18 months after program delivery
completion (after all major equipment items have been transferred and training completed).
 The goal for EUCOM is to conduct 6 assessment visits per year
 Assessments will ideally include in-country and in-theater visits
o In-country assessment visits typically take 3-4 days and should include access to the
ODC, MoD/General Staff, and recipient unit(s)
o In-theater assessment visits will target the recipient unit(s) and will be coordinated as
time, availability, and resources permit
POC Email Address
LTC John-Michael Insetta, ECJ5-SCP, 430-6834 john.m.insetta.mil@mail.mil
104
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
TCA – Traditional CCMD Activities

Description:
Traditional Combatant Command (CCMD) Activities (TCA) funds are for CCMD use to promote
regional security and other United States national security goals. CCMD activities are one of the
pillars of our Foreign Military Interaction (FMI) initiatives and TCA funding gives CCMDs a flexible
resource to interact with the militaries in their areas of responsibility (AORs) to promote regional
security and other national security goals. They are not intended to replace or duplicate any other
specifically authorized fund sources available to the CCMDs.
TCA funding can be used to fund operating and maintenance (O&M) activities for which the CCMD
has authority. Some examples include but are not limited to:
 Personnel and information exchanges
 Familiarization events
 Regional conferences, seminars, and workshops held primarily in the AOR
 Unit exchanges
 State Partnership Program events
 Staff assistance visits
 Training program reviews and assessments
 Ship rider programs
 Partner Nation medical and dental support planning meetings
 Program administration, such as supplies, equipment, travel, and translation services
TCA funding will NOT be used to fund:
 Any activity specifically denied by congress

 The acquisition of weapons systems and major end items or Research and development
 Training of militaries funded with International Military Education and Training (IMET) or
Foreign Military Sales (FMS)
 Travel normally associated with traditional EUCOM directorate or military components
 Meals, mementos, etc. specifically authorized by Official Representational Funds (ORF)
 Humanitarian and Civic Assistance (HCA) and Humanitarian/Disaster Relief
 Direct support to foreign countries or providing equipment to foreign countries, including
supplementation of funds provided by the FMS, or any Foreign Assistance Act
 Exercise Related Construction (ERC) and Military Construction (MILCON) projects
 Any country not eligible for funding under chapter 5, part II of the Foreign Assistance Act
 US MILPAY for program execution
Legal Basis:
If the engagement activity involves EUCOM payment of any cost of partner nation participation, the
activity must be authorized under a specific legal authority outlined in 10 USC § 1051 conferences,
seminars, or similar events and/or 10 USC § 2010 for exercise related incremental costs. TCA
funds are for CCMD use to promote regional security and other United States national security
goals, but may not be used for security assistance activities.
105
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
 Multiple lines of activity supported due to Mil to Mil activity crossing functional LOAs.
TCA FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17

Requested $8.000 $6.000 $6.000 $8.200 $7.000 $5.000 $5.00 $5.00
Allocated $6.000 $5.900 $5.400 $3.999 $5.200 $4.500 $4.72 $5.077
Used $6.000 $5.900 $5.400 $2.646 $4.700 $1.180 $4.72 TBD

Albania $0.300 $0.210 $0.250 $0.140 $0.220 $0.027 $0.497
Armenia $0.000 $0.110 $0.100 $0.020 $0.016 $0.000 $0.000
Azerbaijan $0.000 $0.350 $0.370 $0.110 $0.101 $0.017 $0.000
BiH $0.600 $0.240 $0.190 $0.020 $0.117 $0.020 $0.286
Bulgaria $0.400 $0.240 $0.510 $0.140 $0.572 $0.071 $0.034
Croatia $0.500 $0.310 $0.190 $0.040 $0.137 $0.037 $0.545
Czech Republic $0.300 $0.160 $0.070 $0.020 $0.105 $0.022 $0.406
Estonia $0.100 $0.110 $0.150 $0.060 $0.135 $0.025 $0.004
Georgia $0.000 $0.250 $0.190 $0.060 $0.103 $0.026 $0.008
Hungary $0.100 $0.120 $0.080 $0.040 $0.026 $0.012 $0.012
Kosovo $0.000 $0.000 $0.120 $0.020 $0.187 $0.088 $0.328
Latvia $0.200 $0.110 $0.070 $0.070 $0.415 $0.056 $0.000
Lithuania $0.200 $0.140 $0.080 $0.020 $0.276 $0.011 $0.002
Macedonia $0.300 $0.120 $0.460 $0.030 $0.081 $0.031 $0.106
Moldova $0.300 $0.410 $0.170 $0.070 $0.065 $0.030 $0.000
Montenegro $0.000 $0.190 $0.220 $0.050 $0.233 $0.000 $0.178
Poland $0.600 $0.440 $0.240 $0.060 $0.199 $0.092 $0.001
Romania $0.600 $0.410 $0.450 $0.240 $0.424 $0.050 $0.039
Russia $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.060 $0.024 $0.000 $0.000
Serbia $0.400 $0.290 $0.190 $0.040 $0.173 $0.025 $0.396
Slovakia $0.200 $0.140 $0.100 $0.020 $0.000 $0.007 $0.000
Slovenia $0.200 $0.110 $0.170 $0.030 $0.085 $0.000 $0.184
Theater $0.700 $0.650 $0.720 $0.000 $0.000 $0.020 $0.000
Turkey $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Ukraine $0.000 $0.980 $0.310 $0.020 $0.063 $0.070 $0.017
US $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.935 $0.379 $1.6
TOTAL $6.000 $6.090 $5.407 $1.363 $4.700 $0.000 $4.72
106
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Request Procedures:
EUCOM TCA budget request is made annually by ECJ5-SCP to the EUCOM Comptroller (ECCM)
who consolidates and prioritizes inputs from countries, Components, EUCOM directorates and
State Partnership Program representatives. TCA funds are one-year, O&M funds.
POC Email Address
LTC Tom Fuller, ECJ5-SCP, 430-5656 thomas.b.fuller.mil@mail.mil
107
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
USACC CULP – USA Cadet Command Cultural

Understanding and Language Proficiency Program
Description:
The Department of the Army Execution Order 070-11 and AR 350-1 require United State
Army Cadet Command (USACC) to conduct overseas cultural deployments in support of
worldwide Army Security Cooperation plans as part of the Army Culture and Foreign
Language Strategy. USACC performs this task by providing Cadets to perform missions all
over the world during the summer training period (15 May – 15 August). These missions
include NGO/Humanitarian service learning projects, Military Exercises, Military to Military
contacts, and Cadet English Language Training Teams. In the EUCOM AOR, USAREUR
proposes mission venues and gains approval / concurrence from EUCOM J9. USAREUR
provides leadership for these missions from internal assets, National Guard State Partnership
Programs, and allocated regionally aligned forces.
Legal Basis:
US Army Cadet Command, (USACC), DA EXORD 070-11, 3.B.1.Q to, “IMPLEMENT

PRE- COMMISSIONING CADET LANGUAGE AND CULTURE IMMERSION TRAINING
DEPLOYMENTS ISO ARMY SECURITY COOPERATION OBJECTIVES.”
AR 350-1 (19 AUG 14) directs TRADOC and USACC to be responsible for a
program to incentivize cultural studies. This program includes the opportunity for
overseas language and cultural immersions, and is the basis for cultural awareness
training missions.
U.S. Army Campaign Support Plan FY 14-19, Annex A: Para 5d. U.S. Army Cadet
Command Culture and Language Programs.
U.S. Army Field Manual (FM) 3-22 provides the conceptual framework for Army support to
geographic combatant commander theater campaign plan objectives and Guidance for
Employment of the Force (GEF) end states.
DA PAM 11-31 Army Security Cooperation Handbook, Chapter 6: Security Cooperation

Execution, provides an overview of Cadet Command’s Culture and Language Immersion
Deployments and includes the program as an Army security cooperation program of
execution.
1997 DoD / DoS “Universal” Memorandum of Understanding on Anti-Terrorism and Force

Protection responsibilities for DoD elements and personnel in foreign areas.
Individual Country Memorandums of Agreement in accordance with the 1997 Universal

MOU.

 Multiple Lines of Activity supported due to Mil to Mil and SPP related activity.
USEUCOM Funding History: All values are in millions of dollars (Note: Financial
information only available beginning in FY11. FY15 country obligations and FY 16
108
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
funding requests are only an estimated value based on current support requests and
funding expectations). All missions are fully funded by USACC; USAREUR, EUCOM,
and in-country teams assist with logistics support and executing financial transactions.
CULP FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

(est.) (est.) (est.)
Requested $0.558 $2.935 $4.072 $3.386 $3.750 $2.670 $2.026 $2.026
Allocated $0.558 $2.935 $4.072 $6.010 $5.290 $2.670 $2.026 $2.026
Used $0.558 $2.935 $4.072 $6.010 $3.35 $3.603
000 33
Funding by Country: All values are in millions of dollars.

(est.)
Albania $0.000 $0.000 $0.100 $0.207 $0.156 $0.229 $0.000
Bosnia $0.000 $0.199 $0.000 $0.140 $0.195 $0.000 $0.000
Bulgaria $0.000 $0.131 $0.248 $0.220 $0.277 $0.309 $0.362
Croatia $0.000 $0.162 $0.066 $0.148 $0.174 $0.000 $0.000
Czech Republic $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.116 $0.148 $0.161 $0.000
Estonia $0.049 $0.154 $0.147 $0.140 $0.000 $0.266 $0.296
France $0.000 $0.000 $0.103 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Georgia $0.000 $0.424 $0.253 $0.225 $0.252 $0.230 $0.000
Germany $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.146 $0.000 $0.231 $0.000
Hungary $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.161 $0.156 $0.185 $0.000
Kosovo $0.000 $0.000 $0.210 $0.210 $0.136 $0.000 $0.000
Latvia $0.000 $0.000 $0.261 $0.157 $0.000 $0.235 $0.268
Lithuania $0.000 $0.353 $0.715 $0.199 $0.202 $0.310 $0.365
Macedonia $0.000 $0.000 $0.175 $0.259 $0.182 $0.000 $0.000
Moldova $0.120 $0.209 $0.195 $0.183 $0.180 $0.000 $0.000
Montenegro $0.000 $0.000 $0.165 $0.204 $0.000 $0.254 $0.000
Poland $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.088 $0.381 $0.436
Portugal $0.282 $0.120 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Romania $0.000 $0.462 $1.129 $0.462 $0.374 $0.263 $0.300
Serbia $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.103 $0.129 $0.000 $0.000
Slovakia $0.137 $0.250 $0.000 $0.000 $0.192 $0.216 $0.000
Slovenia $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.128 $0.000 $0.000
Spain $0.000 $0.257 $0.078 $0.176 $0.132 $0.000 $0.000
Turkey $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.251 $0.000 $0.000
Ukraine $0.000 $0.214 $0.227 $0.216 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
109
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Request Procedures:
 USAREUR develops mission venue priorities, submits to EUCOM J5, J9 as part of TSC
plan for concurrence.
 USAREUR sends prioritized mission venue requests to HQDA, DAMO-SSR.
 HQDA prioritizes requests from ASCCs worldwide and submits to USACC
 USACC develops COAs based on budget, personnel, and training objectives and provides
to DAMO-SSR for approval.
 DAMO-SSR approves, notifies ASCCs of missions and requirements for support.
 USACC desk officers coordinate training plans and logistics with USAREUR and in-country
teams.
 All USACC support activity must comply with the Foreign Clearance Guide,
www.fcg.pentagon.mil/
POC Email Address

Boyko, Trevor J.CIV ECJ9-CPD DSN
trevor.j.boyko.civ@mail.mil
(314) 430-5458
110
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
WIF – Wales Initiative Fund

Description:
In September 2014, the Warsaw Initiative Fund was rebranded as the Wales Initiative Fund
(WIF) by the Secretary of Defense. WIF is a bilateral U.S. Security Cooperation program
supporting the North Atlantic Treaty Organization's (NATO) Partnership for Peace (PfP)
program through exchanges, exercises and activities. Partner nation participation is designed
to enhance capabilities, advance defense reform efforts, and achieve greater NATO-partner
military interoperability. The WIF program contributes to the national security interests of the
U.S. by supporting bilateral and multilateral programs with PfP Partners to:
(a) Advance Partner defense reform through Defense Institution Building (DIB);
(b) Develop U.S. / NATO-Partner Interoperability that enhances Partner full spectrum
contributions to Allied, coalition, and international operations;
(c) Support Partner integration with NATO
(d) Provide U.S. forces peacetime and contingency access to host nations.
WIF is authorized for these EUCOM PfP nations: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bosnia, Georgia,
Macedonia, Moldova, Montenegro, Serbia, Kosovo and Ukraine. WIF is not available for PfP
nations with mature, developed economies (Austria, Finland, Ireland, Sweden and Switzerland)
who must pay their own costs for participation in PfP events. Additionally, OSD policy restricts
the use of WIF to pay Russian costs of participation in PfP events.
In September of 2014, SECDEF also broadened WIF eligibility specifically for the emerging
NATO partners of the Mediterranean Dialogue, the Istanbul Cooperation Initiative and NATO
Partners Across the Globe. Additionally WIF may now be used to support other nations (non-
partners) that have a sufficiently formal and substantive relationship to NATO, as determined by
the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Security Cooperation.
WIF-funded activities with non-partners will be NATO-focused and dedicated to achieving NATO
partnership goals, as applicable. Eligible activities will strengthen partner defense institutions
and promote interoperability through engagements such as, but not limited to, military-to-military
contacts, exchanges, workshops, conferences and advisory efforts. WIF will selectively support
exercise participation for non-PfP partners where such participation benefits U.S. interests.
The activities with non-partners will be small and targeted, and funded as resources permit.
WIF is intended for partner nation incremental cost of participating in PfP events in accordance
with the legal authorities discussed below. These costs must be for consumables and as a
direct result of the partner nation participation. Examples include travel costs, fuel and training
ammunition. WIF cannot be used to purchase equipment, training or construction.
111
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
The Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense, Security Cooperation directs WIF program policy,
and the Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) within the Defense Department,
manages the funding. EUCOM’s WIF Program Manager executes WIF in accordance with the
EUCOM Theater Campaign Plan (TCP) and Regional/Country Campaign Plans (RCP/CCP) and
in coordination with the PfP partner nations, Components, Embassy country teams, Civil-Military
Emergency Preparedness, the George C. Marshall Center, the Center for Civil Military
Relations, State Partnership Program representatives, and the EUCOM staff.
Legal Basis:
WIF funds may be expended under Title 10, Section 1051, Personnel Expenses Bilateral or
Regional Cooperation Programs and Title 10, Section 2010, Combined Military Exercises. See
Defense Security Cooperation Agency, Security Assistance Management Manual, Ch. 11.
WIF FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17

Requested $9.650 $9.853 $10.996 $8.390 $8.184 $6.332 $9.991 $10.800
Allocated $9.352 $8.334 $8.523 $6.982 $7.006 $5.500 $5.900 $7.300
Used $6.270 $6.557 $6.687 $5.019 $5.741 $4.149 $5.200

Albania $0.030 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Armenia $0.186 $0.127 $0.265 $0.241 $0.231 $0.132 $0.975
Azerbaijan $0.216 $0.304 $0.327 $0.264 $0.296 $0.025 $0.660
BiH $0.116 $0.172 $0.773 $0.484 $0.479 $0.465 $0.968
Croatia $0.035 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Georgia $0.273 $0.409 $0.531 $0.309 $0.506 $0.565 $1.712
Kosovo $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.031 $0.261
Macedonia $0.447 $0.520 $0.705 $0.357 $0.288 $0.257 $0.599
Moldova $0.157 $0.208 $0.283 $0.247 $0.205 $0.393 $1.004
Montenegro $0.125 $0.140 $0.331 $0.177 $0.264 $0.154 $0.602
Serbia $0.158 $0.234 $0.315 $0.290 $0.201 $0.218 $0.974
Ukraine $1.406 $1.252 $0.901 $0.564 $0.689 $0.764 $1.966
Theater $3.121 $3.193 $2.256 $2.086 $2.582 $1.142 $0.265
TOTAL $6.270 $6.557 $6.687 $5.019 $5.741 $4.149 $9.991
112
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Request Procedures:
EUCOM’s WIF budget request is made annually to OSD by ECJ5-SCP who consolidates and
prioritizes inputs based on policy and strategic objectives in Country Cooperation Plans. Event
proposals which meet these objectives should be submitted into the Concept & Funding
Request (CFR) database for consideration by 31 Jan each year. Activities can be conducted by
EUCOM, countries, Components, State Partnership Program, George C. Marshall Center, the
Center for Civil-Military Relations, and others. Once approved by OSD, DSCA provides funds to
EUCOM quarterly. WIF is one-year O&M funds.
POC Email Address
Ms. Sandra Shurman, ECJ5-SCP, DSN 430-7704 sandra.j.shurman.civ@mail.mil
Mr. Edmond Shelleda, ECJ5-SCP, DSN 430-4596 edmond.c.shelleda.civ@mail.mil

CFR Website https://tsc.eucom.mil/
113
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
DOS – Assistance for European, Eurasia, and Central Asia

(AEECA)
Description:
NOTE: For the countries of Europe, Eurasia, and Central Asia, the FY 2013 budget normalized
foreign assistance resources by requesting funding for programs formerly supported through the
Assistance for Europe, Eurasia and Central Asia (AEECA) account in the Global Health
Programs (GHP) account as well as in the Economic Support Fund (ESF) and International
Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement (INCLE) accounts.
AEECA funded the majority of USAID and INL programming in Europe and Eurasia. AEECA
has been overseen by the Coordinator of US Assistance to Europe and Eurasia at DOS.
AEECA funding is intended to help build democracy, rule of law, and economic development in
Southeast Europe and Eurasia. Programs are implemented by USAID, State, Justice,
Homeland Security, Treasury, Commerce, and others.
Capabilities/Limitations: Funding for non-military development in:

 Peace and Security (INL police, border security, and rule of law programs; INL programs
often implemented by DOJ Resident Legal Advisors (OPDAT) and Police Advisors
(ICITAP)
 Economic Growth (USAID programs)
 Governing Justly and Democratically (USAID civil society, rule of law, elections and DOS
Public Diplomacy programs)
 Humanitarian Assistance (DOS and USAID)
 Investing in People (USAID Health and Education)
Fund Source: DOS
Legal Basis:
Title 22
AEECA FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17

Requested $630.613 $599.164 $513.907 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Allocated $610.882 $583.900 $513.800 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Used $610.882 $599.164 $513.800 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
114
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED

Albania $22.000 $20.000 $16.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Armenia $41.000 $39.725 $40.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Azerbaijan $22.000 $20.000 $16.600 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Belarus $15.000 $13.864 $11.072 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
BiH $36.000 $42.000 $39.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Bulgaria $0.800 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Georgia $59.000 $65.800 $66.732 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Kosovo $95.000 $79.000 $61.998 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Macedonia $22.000 $22.650 $14.273 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Moldova $19.650 $19.500 $21.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Montenegro $8.500 $8.000 $3.140 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Poland $0.000 $0.000 $3.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Region/Black
$38.591 $37.860 $71.565 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Sea-Eurasia
Region/Europe $34.341 $29.890 $9.427 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Russia $59.000 $54.350 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Serbia $49.000 $45.000 $33.500 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Ukraine $89.000 $86.261 $79.100 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
TOTAL $610.882 $583.900 $513.907 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
POC Email Address
Mr. Kevin Lyon , ECJ9, 430-7082 kevin.lyon@eucom.smil.mil
115
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
DOS – Economic Support Fund (ESF)

Description:
The Economic Support Fund (ESF) advances U.S. interests by helping countries meet short-
and long-term political, economic, and security needs. These needs are addressed through a
range of activities, from countering terrorism and extremist ideology to increasing the role of the
private sector in the economy; assisting in the development of effective, accessible,
independent legal systems; supporting transparent and accountable governance; and the
empowerment of citizens. Programs funded through this account are critical to U.S. national
security because they prevent wars and contain conflicts, foster economic prosperity at home by
opening markets overseas, promote U.S. exports, and help countries transition to developed
economies.
For the countries of Europe, Eurasia, and Central Asia, the FY 2013 budget normalizes foreign
assistance resources by requesting funding for programs formerly supported through the
Assistance for Europe, Eurasia and Central Asia (AEECA) account in the ESF account as well
as in the Global Health Programs (GHP) and International Narcotics Control and Law
Enforcement (INCLE) accounts.
Source: DOS
Program Manager: DOS and USAID
Legal Basis:
Title 22
ESF FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17

Requested $11.000 $11.000 $6.000 $358.077 $352.941 $316.074 $435.205 $525.567
Allocated $33.000 $15.852 $6.000 $368.552 $324.567 $479.676
Used $33.000 $15.852 $8.500 $368.552 $324.567 $479.676

Albania $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $10.378 $6.079 $5.976 $6.000 $6.000
Armenia $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $27.026 $20.700 $11.482 $18.360 $22.412
Azerbaijan $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $11.029 $9.000 $6.252 $7.978 $10.936
Belarus $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $11.001 $11.000 $7.000 $9.000 $9.000
BiH $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $28.416 $25.554 $19.175 $24.300 $30.269
Cyprus $11.000 $8.362 $3.500 $2.925 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Georgia $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $42.468 $39.400 $38.266 $50.552 $63.025
Ireland $17.000 $2.500 $2.500 $2.090 $1.250 $0.750 $0.000 0.000
116
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED

Kosovo $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $46.151 $37.891 $28.450 $35.470 $38.470
Macedonia $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $10.187 $5.207 $3.665 $5.000 $6.908
Moldova $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $16.481 $15.050 $15.050 $31.820 $41.121
Montenegro $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.823 $0.374 $0.130 $0.000 $0.000
OSCE $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $16.445 $23.000 $22.131 $17.500 $19.000
Poland $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $5.893 $0.000 $3.000 $3.000 $3.000
Region/Black
$5.000 $2.495 $1.250 $58.029 $61.185 $36.750 $60.908 $66.776
Sea-Eurasia
Region/Europe $0.000 $2.495 $1.250 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Serbia $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $22.271 $14.877 $7.250 $11.250 $16.258
Turkey $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Ukraine $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $56.939 $54.000 $274.349 $154.067 $192.392
TOTAL $33.000 $15.852 $8.500 $368.552 $324.567 $479.676 $435.205 $525.567
POC Email Address
Mr. Kevin Lyon, ECJ9, 430-7082 kevin.lyon@eucom.smil.mil
117
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
DOS – Global Health Programs (GHP)

Description:
The Global Health Programs account (formerly “Global Health and Child Survival”) funds health-
related foreign assistance managed by the Department of State and the U.S. Agency for
International Development (USAID). Investments in global health protect Americans at home
and abroad, strengthen fragile or failing states, promote social and economic progress, and
support the rise of capable partners who can help to solve regional and global problems. U.S.
Government efforts in global health are a signature of American leadership in the world,
including the United States' historic commitment to the treatment, care, and prevention of
HIV/AIDS. The programs are focused on three key areas: Saving Mothers and Children;
Creating an AIDS-Free Generation; and Fighting Other Infectious Diseases.
Legal Basis:
Title 22
GHP FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17

Requested $0.000 $33.128 $46.700 $53.450 $31.004 $33.215 $32.615 $32.615
Allocated $0.000 $37.110 $34.200 $26.265 $21.015 $28.454
Used $0.000 $37.110 $25.653 $26.265 $21.015 $28.454

Armenia $0.000 $0.399 $0.000 $2.386 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Azerbaijan $0.000 $1.248 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Georgia $0.000 $0.850 $0.450 $3.664 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Region/Black Sea
$0.000 $0.450 $12.050 $0.618 $1.500 $1.200 $1.000 $1.000
Eurasia
Russia $0.000 $10.788 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Ukraine $0.000 $23.375 $13.153 $19.587 $19.515 $27.254 $31.615 $31.615
TOTAL $0.000 $37.110 $25.653 $26.255 $21.015 $28.454 $32.615 $32.615
POC Email Address
118
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
DOS – International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement

(INCLE)
Description:
International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement (INCLE) supports country and global programs
critical to combating transnational crime and illicit threats, including efforts against terrorist networks
in the illegal drug trade and illicit enterprises. INCLE funded programs seek to close the gaps
between law enforcement jurisdictions and strengthen law enforcement institutions that are weak or
corrupt. Significant INCLE funds are focused where security situations are most dire, and where U.S.
resources are used in tandem with host country government strategies in order to maximize impact.
For the countries of Europe, Eurasia, and Central Asia, the FY 2013 budget normalizes foreign
assistance resources by requesting funding for programs formerly supported through the Assistance
for Europe, Eurasia and Central Asia (AEECA) account in the INCLE account as well as in the Global
Health Programs (GHP) and Economic Support Fund (ESF) accounts.
Legal Basis: Title 22
INCLE FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17

Requested $0.000 $0.500 $0.500 $48.633 $43.798 $30.700 $34.900 $45.705
Allocated $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $53.703 $43.798 $40.700
Used $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $53.703 $43.798 $40.700

Albania $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $4.445 $4.450 $2.650 $2.650 $2.650
Armenia $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $3.009 $2.824 $1.700 $1.700 $1.700
Azerbaijan $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $1.262 $1.226 $0.800 $0.800 $0.000
BiH $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $7.535 $6.735 $3.800 $3.800 $3.800
Georgia $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $5.565 $3.947 $3.500 $3.500 $4.000
Kosovo $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $11.751 $10.674 $10.600 $9.500 $9.500
Macedonia $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $1.893 $1.786 $1.600 $1.600 $1.600
Moldova $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $3.062 $3.230 $2.800 $2.800 $3.510
Montenegro $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $1.831 $1.826 $1.500 $1.500 $1.695
Region/Black
$0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $5.425 $0.000 $0.800 $0.800 $0.000
Sea-Eurasia
Serbia $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $3.517 $3.000 $2.250 $2.250 $2.250
Turkey $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Ukraine $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $4.408 $4.100 $8.700 $4.000 $15.000
TOTAL $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $53.703 $43.798 $40.700 $34.900 $45.705
119
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
 Counter-Narcotics Capacity
POC Email Address
120
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
DOS – Nonproliferation, Antiterrorism, Demining, and

Related Programs (NADR)
Description:
NADR-funded program supports non-proliferation and counterterrorism objectives. Includes the

Nonproliferation and Disarmament Fund and, the Global Threat Reduction Program to
strengthen bio-security and nuclear smuggling programs; the Export Control and Related Border
Security program to strengthen border security and help states implement United Nations
Security Council Resolution 1540 related to nonproliferation of weapons of mass destruction;
Anti-Terrorism Assistance program and Counterterrorism Finance program build law
enforcement capacity to fight terrorism.
Capabilities/Limitations:
 NON-PROLIFERATION – EXBS: Programs to halt the proliferation of WMD, their
delivery systems, and advanced conventional weapons systems.
 ANTITERRORISM - S/CT (overseen by RSOs at posts): Programs to build capacity of
law enforcement institutions related to terrorist movements and terrorist finance.
 CONVENTIONAL WEAPONS DESTRUCTION - PM/WRA: Advances peace and
security by responding to the security threat and risk to indigenous populations posed by
landmines and UXOs, small arms and light weapons and MANPADS.
Fund Source: DOS

Program Manager: DOS: PM/WRA, ISN, S/CT
Legal Basis:
Title 22
 WMD Nonproliferation
NADR FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17

Requested $21.340 $19.985 $24.300 $26.250 $22.000 $22.000 $0.000 $0.000
Allocated $21.340 $19.985 $24.300 $26.063 $19.215 $19.649 $0.000 $0.000
Used $21.340 $19.685 $24.210 $26.063 $19.215 $19.649 $0.000 $0.000
121
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED

Albania $3.559 $2.650 $2.650 $2.924 $2.370 $2.070 $0.000 $0.000
Armenia $0.750 $0.850 $0.850 $1.464 $0.740 $1.040 $0.000 $0.000
Azerbaijan $0.965 $1.215 $0.865 $0.775 $0.775 $0.735 $0.000 $0.000
BiH $1.850 $1.250 $5.250 $5.595 $4.220 $4.220 $0.000 $0.000
Bulgaria $0.400 $0.000 $0.000 $0.250 $0.250 $0.250 $0.000 $0.000
Croatia $0.450 $0.450 $1.250 $1.399 $0.900 $0.850 $0.000 $0.000
Cyprus $0.000 $0.500 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Georgia $1.300 $2.575 $2.025 $2.800 $1.250 $1.500 $0.000 $0.000
Kosovo $1.070 $0.750 $0.910 $0.850 $0.720 $0.720 $0.000 $0.000
Macedonia $1.020 $0.520 $0.520 $0.470 $0.490 $0.490 $0.000 $0.000
Malta $0.400 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Moldova $0.290 $0.400 $0.400 $0.400 $0.380 $0.380 $0.000 $0.000
Montenegro $0.500 $1.000 $1.500 $0.500 $0.490 $0.490 $0.000 $0.000
Region/Black Sea-
$1.500 $1.000 $1.450 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Eurasia
Region/Europe $0.000 $0.250 $0.290 $2.136 $1.010 $0.850 $0.000 $0.000
Russia $1.000 $1.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Serbia $0.650 $1.150 $2.650 $2.650 $2.410 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Turkey $3.195 $1.425 $1.100 $0.850 $0.820 $1.534 $0.000 $0.000
Ukraine $2.500 $2.700 $2.500 $3.000 $2.410 $2.410 $0.000 $0.000
TOTAL $21.340 $19.985 $24.300 $21.250 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
POC Email Address
122
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
DOS – Israeli Arab Scholarship Program (IASP)

Description:
The Israeli Arab Scholarship Program (IASP) funds scholarship programs for Israeli Arabs to
attend institutions of higher education in the United States. The IASP Trust Fund will provide an
estimated $47,000 in interest earnings in FY 2017 to support such activities to be implemented
by the Bureau of Education and Cultural Affairs. Due to the low interest earned by this trust
fund, the Department intends to allow for the accumulation of interest and earnings over time to
effectively implement the scholarship program. In the meantime, opportunities for highly
qualified Israeli-Arab graduate students to attend institutions of higher education in the U.S. will
be included as part of the Fulbright program.
Fund Source: DOS

Legal Basis:
Title 22
IASP FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17

Requested $0.375 $0.418 $0.375 $0.374 $0.013 $0.024 $0.047 $0.047
Allocated $0.375 $0.418 $0.375 $0.377 $0.013 $0.024 $0.047
Used $0.375 $0.418 $0.375 $0.000 $0.013 $0.024

Israel $0.375 $0.418 $0.375 $0.377 $0.013 $0.024 $0.047 $0.047
TOTAL $0.375 $0.418 $0.375 $0.377 $0.013 $0.024 $0.047 $0.047
POC Email Address
123
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
DOS – Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC)

Description:
The Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) makes significant contributions to the

Administration’s foreign policy priorities, including advancing the Presidential Policy Directive on
Global Development and strengthening food security. The funding helps high-performing poor
countries reduce poverty, develop markets, and strengthen democratic governance. MCC
contributes to country-led and results-focused development through five-year compact
assistance programs designed to maximize sustainable poverty reduction by fostering economic
growth. MCC also supports smaller two-to-three year threshold programs that address
constraints to economic growth.
The five countries in Europe that have previously been awarded compact or threshold contracts
are Albania, Armenia, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine. On Dec. 16, 2015, the MCC Board
selected Kosovo as newly eligible for compact. Kosovo, which passed MCC’s scorecard for the
first time after making progress on democratic rights, is a new partner for MCC.
Since 2004, MCC has signed 32 compacts and funded 26 threshold program agreements,
committing nearly $12 billion to poverty reduction programs built on measurable and transparent
objectives.
Fund Source: DOS

Legal Basis:
Title 22
USEUCOM Funding History: All values are in millions of dollars (Contracts allocated across fiscal
years)
MCC FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17

Requested $131.525 $126.651 $52.400 $52.400 $80.400 $80.400 $28.000 $28.000
Allocated $131.525 $126.651 $52.400 $52.400 $80.400 $80.400
Used $131.525 $126.651 $52.400 $52.400 $80.400 $80.400
124
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Funding by Country: All values are in millions of dollars (Contracts allocated across fiscal years)

Albania $6.292 $6.292 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Armenia $39.743 $29.322 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Georgia $77.273 $38.636 $0.000 $0.000 $28.000 $28.000 $28.000 $28.000
Moldova $4.125 $52.400 $52.400 $52.400 $52.400 $52.400 $0.000 $0.000
Ukraine $4.092 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
TOTAL $131.525 $126.651 $52.400 $52.400 $80.400 $80.400 $28.000 $28.000

 Humanitarian Assistance
POC Email Address
125
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
DOS – Migration and Refugee Assistance (MRA)

Description:
The international humanitarian programs of the U.S. Government provide critical protection and
assistance to some of the world’s most vulnerable people: refugees, internally displaced
persons (IDPs), stateless persons, vulnerable migrants, and victims of conflict. Reflecting the
American people’s dedication to assisting those in need, programs funded through the Migration
and Refugee Assistance (MRA) account save lives and ease suffering while upholding human
dignity. They help stabilize volatile situations and prevent or mitigate conditions that breed
extremism and violence, and are an essential component of U.S. foreign policy. The
Humanitarian Migrants to Israel portion of this funding maintains U.S. Government support for
relocation and integration of Jewish migrants, including those from the former Soviet Union,
Eastern Europe, and Africa, to Israel.
Fund Source: DOS

Legal Basis: Title 22
MRA FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17

Requested $61.799 $59.000 $49.000 $64.020 $59.331 $41.000 $31.000 $40.400
Allocated $72.850 $74.700 $66.100 $64.020 $59.331 $69.385
Used $72.850 $74.700 $66.100 $64.020 $59.331 $69.385

Israel $25.000 $25.000 $20.000 $19.320 $10.680 $10.000 $31.000 $7.500
Theater $47.850 $49.700 $46.100 $44.700 $48.651 $59.385 TBD $32.900
TOTAL $72.850 $74.700 $66.100 $64.020 $59.331 $59.385 TBD $40.400

 Humanitarian Assistance
POC Email Address
126
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
DTRA – Cooperative Biological Engagement Program (CBEP)

Description:
The DoD CBEP has the following objectives:
• Secure and consolidate collections of especially dangerous pathogens (EDP) and

associated research at a minimum number of secure health and agricultural
laboratories/facilities
• Enhance partner country/region’s capability to prevent the sale, theft, diversion, or
accidental release of biological weapons-related materials, technology, and expertise
• Enhance partner country/region’s capability to detect, diagnose, and report
endemic/epidemic, man-made or natural outbreaks, bio-terror attacks, and potential
pandemics
• Ensure the developed capabilities are designed to be sustainable within each partner
country/region’s current budget
• Facilitate the engagement of the region/partner country’s scientific and technical
personnel in the research in areas that are of interest to both the region/partner and the
United States
• Eliminate any BW-related infrastructure and technologies encountered in a
region/partner country
Capabilities:
• Secures and consolidates collections of EDP and associated research

• Enhances partner country biosafety and biosecurity standards/practices
• Enhances partner country disease detection, diagnosis, and reporting
• Eliminates bioweapons-related infrastructure and technologies
• Engages partner country life science personnel in collaborative research efforts
Limitations:
• CBEP funds expenditure requires SecDef determination; however, the program has
authority to work in all former Soviet Countries in the EUCOM AOR and Turkey
• CBEP does not focus on purely public health concerns (i.e. HIV/AIDS, TB, etc…)
• Outbreak response assistance is usually limited to advisory/non-material support
Program Manager: Mr. Lance Brooks, DTRA, (703) 767-5980
127
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CBEP FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19

Requested $128.100 $91.414 $203.955 $65.983 $51.073 $25.504 $19.198
Allocated $128.100 $91.414 $203.955 $65.983 $51.073 $25.504 $22.7
$128.100 $91.414 $203.955 $65.983 $51.073 59
Used

Armenia $15.300 $13.470 $25.136 $17.027 $12.746 $3.368 $4.126 $4.000
Azerbaijan $20.500 $2.451 $22.746 $14.541 $7.039 $3.453 $3.263 $3.157
Georgia $41.600 $40.745 $35.073 $18.549 $6.583 $4.430 $4.076 $4.000
Russia $0.000 $2.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Ukraine $50.700 $32.748 $121.000 $5.000 $12.381 $3.581 $3.383 $3.112
Turkey $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $2.000 $3.000
Regional $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $10.866 $12.324 $10.672 $2.350 $5.490
TOTAL $128.100 $91.414 $203.955 $65.983 $51.073 $25.504 $19.198 $22.759
POC Email Address

LTC William Sumner, ECJ5-W 430-7875 william.e.sumner2.mil@mail.mil
LTC Joseph Kling, 430-7872 joseph.a.kling.mil@mail.mil
Lt Col Kim T. Leba, DTRA LNO, 430-7374 kim.t.leba.mil@mail.mil
128
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
DTRA – CBRN Preparedness Program (CP2)

Description:
The CBRN Preparedness Program (CP2) is the U.S. Department of Defense’s lead program for
developing Partner Nations’ (PN) capabilities to Prevent, Protect, Mitigate, Respond and Recover from
Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) incidents. It conducts Building Partner
Capacity (BPC) activities to train, and equip PN military and civilian agencies to improve their
proficiency in CBRN Response.
CP2 operates under the authority of Title 10, U.S. Code – Armed Forces (Title 10) and Section 1204 of
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, Title XII, Subtitle A (§1204). T While Title
10 authorizes CP2 to provide CBRN first responder training to military entities,1 “1204” authorizes the
Secretary of Defense, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, to “provide assistance to the
military and civilian first responder organizations of foreign countries” to prepare PNs to effectively
respond to incidents involving WMD. 2 1204 also enables limited equipping, and it is a major factor
behind CP2’s success.
CP2 training and equipping assistance emphasizes “left of boom” activities. The emphasis on
Preparedness enables targeted training and provide assistance to address specific, targeted needs as
an incident is developing or occurring. CP2 promotes engagement as a security cooperation tool and
addresses long-term DoD international cooperation goals through the expansion or development of
BPC activities. CP2 support to CCMDs enables a response that is faster, more effectively targeted,
and capable of integration into an all-hazard response. By prior coordination, CP2 is able to limit the
size of a U.S. response to assessed needs and compatible equipment.
CP2 implements a phased, tailored approach with emphasis on whole-of-government. This approach
involves a thorough assessment effort to determine priorities and identify opportunities to collaborate
with existing programs across the U.S. Government Interagency (USG IA) and private sector.
Throughout the program’s four phases (plan, assess, enhance, and sustain) every effort will be made
to partner with CCMDs, other DTRA Programs, and the USG IA to ensure a collaborative approach is
taken, and to reduce or eliminate redundancy.
Limitations:
 As of end of FY16 NDAA Section 1204 activities can only be conducted in Turkey, Albania, Ukraine,
Georgia, Moldova, Macedonia, and Kosovo.
Partner Agencies
 Department of State, Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation, WMD Office (ISN/WMD)
Program Manager
Mr. Ben Cacioppo, J3/7, (703) 767-5787, ben.a.cacioppo.civ@mail.mil
1
U.S. Code, Title 10, Armed Forces.
2
The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 Section 1273 extended the NDAA FY 2014, Section 1204 expiration date from
September 30, 2017 to September 30, 2019.
129
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Program Plan
Time Event Country(ies)
1Q/FY17 Ukraine SSES CWMD TTX Ukraine
European Strategy Integration Working Group

1Q/FY17 CCMD
(ESIWG)
Disaster Response Awareness and Operational

1Q/FY17 Macedonia
Course
Georgia CWMD Assessment and Strategic
1Q/FY17 Georgia
Engagement Planning
Albania DR TOEM and HAZMAT Operations

2Q/FY17 Albania
Course
Ukraine HAZMAT Operations and Pre-Technician

2Q/FY17 Ukraine
Course
Disaster Response Awareness and Operational
2Q/FY17 Kosovo
Course
2Q/FY17 Moldova MCD TOEM/TOP/NET Moldova
3Q/FY17 Albania HAZMAT Tech Course Albania

3Q/FY17 Macedonia MCD TOEM/TOP/NET Macedonia
3Q/FY17 Ukraine HAZMAT Tech Course Ukraine
3Q/FY17 Turkey WMD Forensics Course Turkey
3Q/FY17 Moldova EOC Training/Assessment Moldova
4Q/FY17 CBRN SLS Policy/Doctrine Albania
4Q/FY17 Kosovo MCD TOEM/TOP/NET Kosovo
4Q/FY17 Ukraine CBRN Response CPX Ukraine

4Q/FY17 Regional CBRN Response Exercise Albania
POC Email Address

130
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
DTRA – Global Nuclear Security Program (GNS)

Description:
This program supports the security of the global community through cooperative engagements to
secure nuclear weapons, nuclear material, and high-threat radiological material in storage and in
transit. GNS has three core program areas: nuclear security enhancements; centers of excellence
(COEs); and transportation of nuclear weapons, nuclear materials and high threat radiological
material
Capabilities:
 Cooperate with U.S. and global partners to secure materials and weapons from the threat of
theft or diversion
 Enhance training capabilities to provide continued nuclear security
 Transport nuclear material and high-threat radiological material securely
 Facility exchanges to improve global nuclear security practices.
Limitations
 Umbrella Agreement with Russian Federation expired June 2013.
Program Manager: Mr. Scott Crow, DTRA, (703) 767-0301, DSN 312-427-0301,
david.s.crow.civ@mail.mil
GNS FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17

Requested $0.000 $64.500 $63.900 $15.000 $10.400 $0.000 $2.100 $11.820
Allocated $0.000 $64.500 $63.900 $15.000 $10.400 $6.720 $2.100 0
$3.640
Used $0.000 $64.500 $63.900 $15.000 $10.400 $6.720 $2.100 $0.000

Russia $0.000 $64.500 $63.900 $5.313 $10.400 $1.000 $0.000 $0.000
Ukraine $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $5.720 $2.100 $3.640
TOTAL $0.000 $64.500 $63.900 $5.313 $10.400 $6.720 $2.100 $3.640
POC Email Address

131
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
DTRA – International Counterproliferation Program (ICP)

Description:
The mission of the International Counterproliferation Program (ICP) is to counter the threat of the
proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD), related materials and technologies across
the borders and through the territories of participating nations. The program enhances the ability of
host-country agencies to prevent and counter the proliferation of WMD and related items across
international borders. It also strives to aid host-country agencies to deter, detect, investigate, and
interdict crimes regarding WMD and related items, such as Chemical, Biological, Radiological and
Nuclear agents, and “dual use” items. The program assists in the continuing development of a
professional cadre of border and law enforcement officials, while also delivering technical
assistance via low- and high-tech equipment, training, and advice. Ultimately, ICP endeavors to
establish a long-term, mutually beneficial relationship between host-country agencies and those of
the U.S. Government. Participating nation agencies include: Border/Frontier Guard/Police,
Customs, Fire/Rescue & Emergency Service(s), Security Police Non-and Counter-Proliferation
Units, Radiation Safety Centers, National and State Police, Immigration, Public Health,
Development Agencies, Ministries of Foreign Affairs and other agencies.
WMD training and education are key ICP components in order to expand and improve U.S. efforts
to deter the possible proliferation and acquisition of WMD by organized crime organizations in
Africa, Asia, Eastern Europe, the Baltic countries, states of the Former Soviet Union, as well as
other countries determined by the Secretary of Defense where there exists a threat of proliferation
and acquisition. U.S. policy personnel assess the current expertise and capabilities of the host
nation and request senior policy officials of the participating countries to attend a WMD Executive
Seminar. This allows the U.S. policy personnel to facilitate discussions on the proliferation threat
and host nation capabilities to counter the threat. Tailored training follows, which focuses on
increasing the readiness and skills of border guards, customs agents, and other law enforcement
officials, as well as prosecutors and emergency response elements.
Capabilities/Limitations:
 Development of professional cadre of border and law enforcement officials

 Delivery of technical assistance via low- and high- tech equipment, training, and advice
 Establishment of long-term, mutually beneficial relationships between host-country
agencies and those of the USG
Partner Agencies
 Department of Homeland Security (DHS) - Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
Department of Homeland
 Security (DHS) - Homeland Security Investigations (HSI)
 Department of Justice (DOJ) - Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
 Department of State (DOS) - Department of State, Bureau of International Security and
Nonproliferation (ISN)
Program Manager: Mr. Kevin Sullivan, DTRA, (703)767-0895, kevin.m.sullivan122.civ@mail.mil
132
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Program Plan
1Q/FY17 PSI Workshop Romania
1Q/FY17 WMD Bi-Lateral Strategy Development Montenegro, Macedonia
1Q/FY17 WMD Tri-Lateral Strategy Development Ukraine, Kosovo, Albania
2Q/FY17 Policy Visit for Exercise Planning Montenegro
Albania, Bosnia and
Herzegovina, Croatia,
2Q/FY17 WMD Strategy Development Workshop Montenegro, Macedonia,
Moldova, Romania,
Ukraine, Kosovo, Serbia
Greece, Bulgaria,
Romania, Ukraine,
3Q/FY17 WMD Strategic Maritime Interdiction Moldova, Georgia
Albania, Bosnia and

3Q/FY17 WMD Strategy Development Workshop Montenegro, Macedonia,
Moldova, Romania,
Montenegro and Bosnia
3Q/FY17 Table Top Exercise Development
and Herzegovina
South East Europe
3Q/FY17 WMD Cyber Course*
RACVIAC members
3Q/FY17 WMD Investigation Analysis* Bosnia and Herzegovina
4Q/FY17 WMD Crisis incident Management* Bosnia and Herzegovina
4Q/FY17 WMD Crime Scene Investigation* Bosnia and Herzegovina
4Q/FY17 WMD Strategy Development Workshop Albania, Bosnia and
Montenegro, Macedonia,
Moldova, Romania,
* Tentative. Depends on unfunded requirement approval.
133
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
POC Email Address

134
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
DTRA – Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI)
Description:
Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI) activities are designed to support Geographic Combatant
Command (GCC) and U.S. Government participation in U.S.-led and foreign-hosted multinational PSI
exercises and workshops as part of a global effort to stop trafficking of WMD, associated delivery
systems, and related materials to and from state and non-state actors of proliferation concern. The
Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) maintains the PSI Support Cell and provides personnel
and funding to staff the Cell, thus supporting Department of Defense (DoD) efforts to develop
dedicated PSI exercises and embed PSI-related activities into existing exercises executed by the
GCCs. Currently, there are over 100 PSI endorsing nations. The primary objective of DTRA efforts
are to increase GCC and partner nations’ understanding of and support for the PSI by providing
subject matter expertise during exercise/activity planning and execution.
Chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff Instruction (CJCSI) 3520.02 directs the PSI Support Cell to support
U.S. PSI exercise requirements by designing, planning, and executing international PSI exercises,
workshops, training, games, and outreach for DoD (including all GCCs, the Interagency and foreign
partners). They support GCC staffs and other U.S. agencies in coordinating participation in foreign-
hosted PSI exercises and advocate for inclusion of PSI critical capabilities and practices (CCP) and
WMD interdiction “best practices.” The Cell supports Joint Staff/ Office of the Secretary of Defense in
the planning and execution of international PSI exercises and games involving the Interagency. They
support U.S. exercise control teams as required during all PSI exercises. They provide subject matter
experts and/or support to international PSI meetings and activities as arranged by the Joint Staff and
the Office of the Secretary of Defense.
Capabilities:
Strengthen interdiction policies and legal authorities
Build capacities of endorsing states to conduct interdictions
Demonstrate a collective commitment to act against proliferation-related shipments
Limitations:
PSI activities are supported through GCC operations and maintenance (O&M) funding which is
often limited.
PSI is reliant on funding sources that are often unable to fund foreign participant travel.
PSI exercise schedules are normally promulgated outside normal DoD procedures.
Partner Agencies:
 Department of Defense (DoD) - Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Countering

Weapons of Mass Destruction (DASD/C-WMD)
 Department of Defense (DoD) - Joint Staff J-5 CWMD
 Department of Defense (DoD) - United States Africa Command (USAFRICOM)
 Department of Defense (DoD) - United States Central Command (USCENTCOM)
135
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
 Department of Defense (DoD) - United States European Command (USEUCOM)
 Department of Defense (DoD) - United States Northern Command (USNORTHCOM)
 Department of Defense (DoD) - United States Pacific Command (USPACOM)
 Department of Defense (DoD) - United States Southern Command (USSOUTHCOM)
 Department of Energy (DOE) - National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
 Department of Homeland Security (DHS) - United States Coast Guard (USCG)
 Department of Justice (DOJ) - Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
 Department of Treasury (Treasury)
 Intelligence Community (IC) - National Counter Proliferation Center (NCPC)
 IC - National Security Council – Interdiction Interagency Policy Committee
Program Manager: Mr. Patrick Christian, J3/7, (703) 767-2832, patrick.m.christian.civ@mail.mil
Program Plan
Workshop/Table-top exercise with International Bulgaria, Georgia, Greece,

1Q/FY17 Counterproliferation Program (ICP) (Host: Moldova, Romania, Turkey,
Romania) Serbia and Ukraine
TBD: Southern Europe and
1Q/FY17 Mediterranean Initiative TTX (Host: Italy)
Maghreb countries
Albania, Bosnia and
Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia,
3Q/FY17 RACVIAC Workshop (Croatia) w/ICP Macedonia, Moldova,
Montenegro, Romania, Serbia,
Turkey, Ukraine, UK
Czech Republic, Estonia,
Finland, Germany, Latvia,
4Q/FY17 Lithuania Workshop/TTX (Host: Lithuania)
Lithuania, Norway, Poland,
Slovakia, Sweden, Ukraine, UK
TBD: Southern Europe and

1Q/FY18 Malta TTX (Tentative) (Host/Co-Host: Malta)
Maghreb countries
Albania, Bosnia and
Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia,
3Q/FY18 RACVIAC Workshop (Croatia) w/ICP Macedonia, Moldova,
Montenegro, Romania, Serbia,
Turkey, Ukraine, UK
Czech Republic, Estonia,

Finland, Germany, Latvia,
4Q/FY17 Baltics Workshop/TTX (Host: TBD)
Lithuania, Norway, Poland,
Slovakia, Sweden, Ukraine, UK
136
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
POC Email Address

137
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
DTRA – Strategic Offensive Arms Elimination (SOAE)

Description:
This program supports destruction of strategic weapon delivery systems and associated
infrastructure.
• Eliminates:
o ICBMs and their launchers and supporting infrastructure
o SLBMs and their launchers and supporting infrastructure
o Other vehicles capable or reasonably capable of being adapted to deliver WMD
• Dismantle SSBNs (last dismantlement in Russia scheduled for completion in FY16)
• Provide Ukraine with assistance to support the safe storage, handling, and transport of
SS-24 Solid Rocket Motors (SRM)
• Manage the elimination of SS-24 SRMs in Ukraine, scheduled for completion in 2018
Capabilities:
• Provides equipment and services to destroy or dismantle ICBMs, ICBM silo launchers,
road-mobile launchers, SLBMs, SLBM launchers, nuclear reactor cores of strategic
nuclear powered ballistic missile submarines and WMD infrastructure
Limitations:
• Umbrella Agreement with RF expired June 2013
Program Manager: CDR Charles Taylor, DTRA, (703) 767-1710 DSN 312 427-1710
charles.l.taylor.mil@mail.mil
SOAE FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18
Requested $31.400 $5.700 $23.700 $21.800 $26.411 $5.720 $1.289 $11.791 $11.188
Allocated $31.400 $5.700 $23.700 $21.800 $26.411 $5.720 $1.289 TBD TBD
Used $31.400 $5.700 $23.700 $14.771 $26.411 $5.720 $1.289 TBD TBD
138
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Country FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18
Russia $0.000 $64.500 $63.900 $5.313 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000
Ukraine $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $26.411 $5.720 $1.289 $11.791 $11.188
TOTAL $0.000 $64.500 $63.900 $5.313 $26.411 $5.720 $1.289 $11.791 $11.188
POC Email Address

139
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
DTRA – Weapons of Mass Destruction - Proliferation

Prevention Program (WMD-PPP)
Description:
The goal of the Proliferation Prevention Program (PPP) is to assist partner countries in the
development of effective and sustainable border security capabilities to prevent the proliferation of
Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD), related materials and technology threatening U.S. national
security and global stability.
To accomplish this goal, PPP strengthens the capability of partner countries to secure their borders
against illicit movement of WMD, related materials and technology by providing or enhancing
partner country capability to perform effective risk management; border security Command,
Control, Communications & Computers (C4); border security surveillance; WMD detection; and
border security interdiction.
Additionally, PPP assists partner countries to achieve long-term sustainment of border security
capabilities by assisting partner country with the development of a sustainment budget for all
systems delivered under this program. Providing or enhancing partner country capability to sustain
delivered training. They also promote cooperative relationships to further U.S. national security and
global stability by providing or enhancing a partner country capability to capture and disseminate
information concerning WMD incidents to applicable U.S. Government agencies.
Capabilities:
 Strengthen the capability of partner countries to secure their borders against
illicit movement of WMD and related materials and technology
 Provide or enhance risk management; Command, Control, Communications;
surveillance; WMD detection; inspection/examination; and border security
interdiction
 Assist partner countries to achieve long-term sustainment of border security
capability through development of a sustainment budget for systems delivered under
WMD-PPP and training
 Promote cooperative relationships to further U.S. national security and global stability
by enhancing partner country capability to capture, disseminate, receive, and
safeguard information on WMD incidents
Limitations:
 Limited to working with organizations with the WMD mission
 A SECDEF and SECSTATE determination is required to begin work in any
new countries
 OSD-Policy (CTR) must issue policy guidance and PDATSD (NCB) must
provide strategic implementation guidance
140
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Partner Agencies
 Department of Defense (DoD) - Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical and Biological
Defense (JPEO-CBD)
 Department of Defense (DoD) - United States Africa Command (USAFRICOM)
 Department of Defense (DoD) - United States Central Command (USCENTCOM)
 Department of Defense (DoD) - United States European Command (USEUCOM)
 Department of Defense (DoD) - United States Pacific Command (USPACOM)
 Department of Energy (DOE) - National Nuclear Security Administration, Nuclear Smuggling,
Detection, and Deterrence (Formerly Second Line of Defense (SLD) Program)
 Department of Homeland Security (DHS) - United States Coast Guard (USCG)
 Department of State (DOS) - Department of State, Export Control and Related Border
Security (EXBS)
 National Guard Bureau (NGB) - Army National Guard - Colorado National Guard (ANG-
CONG)
Program Manager: Mr. Mark Sullivan, J3/7, (703) 767-2812, mark.j.sullivan6.civ@mail.mil
Program Plan
In the European theater PPP is engaged with the nations of Armenia, Georgia, and Moldova. At
present, these projects are scheduled to close out over the next 2 to 3 years. There are no new
efforts proposed or projected in the near future, although planning for new projects in FY18 and
beyond is still in the very early stages. Key events for current projects are listed below:
Site inspections and testing with the Moldovan

Border Police (MBP) in preparation for continued
1Q/FY17 training on currently installed border capabilities Moldova
and follow-on construction of Command and
Control (C2) Centers.
Expected construction of integrated C2 centers for

FY17/FY18 MBP to tie together currently installed monitoring Moldova
capabilities.
Follow-on tasks from maritime security initiative

including continued Georgian Coast Guard vessel
FY17 Georgia
modernization, warehouse construction, and
additional equipment procurement.
Expansion of current land border project to

FY17 additional border regions with neighboring Georgia
countries.
141
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Land Border project expected closeout. Follow-

2Q/FY17 Georgia
on tasks to be generated as required.
In conjunction with the DTRA International

Counter-proliferation Program (ICP), WMD-PPP
plans to conduct the Frontier Border Security and
Interdiction training course with the Armenian
Border Guard (ABG) in October 2016. The
purpose of the training program is to provide
1Q/FY17 border guard personnel a basic understanding of Armenia
weapons of mass destruction and to highlight the
importance of interdicting WMD at a country’s
borders. An additional important aspect of the
program is to develop a cadre of ABG instructors
through a train-the-trainer program to take over
the instruction of future courses.
Close out current project tasks. Conduct

FY17 discussions with Armenian National Security Armenia
Service and ABG on potential future cooperation.
POC Email Address

142
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Part 3
Resources by Country
143
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Albania
Program Source FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 TOTALS
AEECA DOS $22.000 $22.000 $16.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $60.000
ESF DOS $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $10.378 $6.079 $5.976 $22.433
FMF DOS $3.000 $3.992 $3.000 $2.848 $2.600 $2.400 $17.840
MCC DOS $6.292 $6.292 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $12.584
INCLE DOS $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $4.445 $4.450 $2.650 $11.545
NADR DOS $2.650 $2.650 $2.700 $2.400 $0.000 $0.000 $10.400
IMET DOS $0.950 $1.064 $1.067 $0.983 $1.063 $1.087 $6.214
OHDACA DSCA $0.000 $1.019 $0.525 $0.575 $0.795 $0.400 $3.314
CRSP OSD $0.000 $0.000 $1.500 $0.815 $0.815 $0.070 $3.200
PDP EUCOM $0.500 $0.000 $0.800 $0.800 $0.800 $0.200 $3.100
Section 1206 OSD $0.242 $0.305 $0.911 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $1.458
ERF EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.498 $0.684 $1.182
TCA EUCOM $0.300 $0.210 $0.250 $0.140 $0.220 $0.027 $1.147
ICP DTRA $0.200 $0.100 $0.350 $0.030 $0.130 $0.248 $1.058
HMA DSCA $0.200 $0.400 $0.000 $0.010 $0.200 $0.147 $0.957
JCET SOCOM $0.000 $0.300 $0.000 $0.250 $0.000 $0.250 $0.800
CTFP DSCA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.131 $0.327 $0.300 $0.758
BPC EUCOM $0.100 $0.320 $0.042 $0.000 $0.003 $0.010 $0.475
USACC CULP Services $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.100 $0.207 $0.156 $0.463
CN OSD $0.200 $0.100 $0.065 $0.077 $0.000 $0.000 $0.442
Section 1203 Services $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.334 $0.334
CP2E DTRA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.094 $0.094
CDI EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.041 $0.050 $0.091
WIF DSCA $0.030 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.030
DEIC OSD $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.015 $0.000 $0.015
TOTAL $36.664 $38.752 $27.210 $23.982 $18.243 $15.083 $159.934
144
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Armenia
AEECA DOS $41.000 $40.000 $40.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $121.000
CBEP DTRA $3.200 $8.100 $15.300 $13.470 $20.136 $17.027 $77.233
MCC DOS $39.743 $29.322 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $69.065
ESF DOS $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $27.026 $20.700 $11.482 $59.208
WMD-PPP DTRA $0.000 $8.213 $2.170 $2.262 $11.113 $0.019 $23.777
FMF DOS $3.000 $2.994 $2.700 $2.564 $2.700 $1.700 $15.658
INCLE DOS $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $3.009 $2.824 $1.700 $7.533
GL&S OSD $0.000 $0.000 $0.850 $1.120 $0.841 $0.841 $3.652
IMET DOS $0.450 $0.449 $0.675 $0.680 $0.586 $0.590 $3.430
NADR DOS $0.750 $0.850 $0.900 $0.765 $0.000 $0.000 $3.265
OHDACA DSCA $0.900 $0.525 $0.325 $0.811 $0.352 $0.040 $2.953
GHP DOS $0.000 $0.399 $0.000 $2.386 $0.000 $0.000 $2.785
GPOI DOS $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.640 $0.800 $1.200 $2.640
ICP DTRA $0.200 $0.400 $0.200 $0.300 $0.000 $0.124 $1.224
WIF DSCA $0.186 $0.127 $0.265 $0.241 $0.231 $0.132 $1.182
HMA DSCA $0.000 $0.000 $0.250 $0.169 $0.169 $0.040 $0.628
GHCS DOS $0.400 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.400
TCA EUCOM $0.000 $0.110 $0.100 $0.020 $0.016 $0.000 $0.246
ERF EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.216 $0.216
CN OSD $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.086 $0.086
HCA EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.030 $0.054 $0.084
CTFP DSCA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.003 $0.022 $0.023 $0.048
BPC EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.018 $0.022 $0.000 $0.040
CDI EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.015 $0.015
TOTAL $89.829 $91.489 $63.735 $55.484 $60.542 $35.289 $396.368
145
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Azerbaijan
CBEP DTRA $24.100 $17.600 $20.500 $2.451 $22.746 $14.541 $101.938
AEECA DOS $22.000 $22.120 $16.600 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $60.720
ESF DOS $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $11.029 $9.000 $6.252 $26.281
FMF DOS $3.000 $2.994 $2.700 $2.564 $2.700 $1.700 $15.658
Section 1206 OSD $0.000 $9.119 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $9.119
IMET DOS $0.900 $0.943 $0.700 $0.576 $0.592 $0.593 $4.304
NADR DOS $0.965 $1.515 $0.900 $0.775 $0.000 $0.000 $4.155
INCLE DOS $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $1.262 $1.226 $0.800 $3.288
OHDACA DSCA $1.400 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.951 $0.873 $3.224
WIF DSCA $0.216 $0.304 $0.327 $0.264 $0.296 $0.025 $1.432
GHCS DOS $1.250 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $1.250
GHP DOS $0.000 $1.248 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $1.248
JCET SOCOM $0.300 $0.300 $0.400 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $1.000
TCA EUCOM $0.000 $0.350 $0.370 $0.110 $0.101 $0.017 $0.948
CTFP DSCA $0.200 $0.150 $0.150 $0.063 $0.253 $0.105 $0.921
PDP EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.220 $0.220 $0.220 $0.200 $0.860
CN OSD $0.200 $0.000 $0.000 $0.531 $0.057 $0.023 $0.811
ICP DTRA $0.000 $0.200 $0.150 $0.300 $0.030 $0.000 $0.680
BPC EUCOM $0.190 $0.040 $0.081 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.311
HMA DSCA $0.300 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.300
DEIC OSD $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.010 $0.013 $0.040 $0.063
CDI EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.025 $0.000 $0.013 $0.038
TOTAL $55.021 $56.883 $43.098 $20.180 $38.185 $25.182 $238.549
146
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Belarus
AEECA DOS $15.000 $14.000 $11.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $40.000
ESF DOS $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $11.001 $11.000 $7.000 $29.001
TOTAL $15.000 $14.000 $11.000 $11.001 $11.000 $7.000 $69.001
147
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Bosnia and Herzegovina

AEECA DOS $36.000 $44.784 $39.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $119.784
ESF DOS $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $28.416 $25.554 $19.175 $73.145
FMF DOS $4.000 $4.491 $4.500 $4.272 $4.500 $4.000 $25.763
INCLE DOS $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $7.535 $6.735 $3.800 $18.070
NADR DOS $2.100 $1.250 $5.300 $4.750 $0.000 $0.000 $13.400
IMET DOS $1.000 $0.985 $0.999 $0.872 $0.982 $0.991 $5.829
OHDACA DSCA $0.800 $1.500 $0.494 $0.847 $0.670 $0.657 $4.968
WIF DSCA $0.116 $0.172 $0.773 $0.484 $0.479 $0.465 $2.489
GPOI DOS $0.400 $0.967 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $1.367
TCA EUCOM $0.600 $0.240 $0.190 $0.020 $0.117 $0.020 $1.187
ICP DTRA $0.300 $0.300 $0.450 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $1.050
CTFP DSCA $0.050 $0.075 $0.075 $0.080 $0.099 $0.150 $0.529
CN OSD $0.200 $0.150 $0.000 $0.066 $0.000 $0.000 $0.416
HMA DSCA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.127 $0.127 $0.000 $0.254
ERC JS $0.000 $0.000 $0.080 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.080
TOTAL $45.566 $54.914 $52.060 $47.469 $39.403 $29.453 $268.865
148
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Bulgaria
FMF DOS $9.000 $9.481 $8.647 $7.406 $7.000 $5.000 $46.534
Section 1206 OSD $1.707 $0.623 $4.129 $7.213 $18.092 $0.000 $31.764
IMET DOS $1.650 $1.778 $1.746 $1.996 $2.063 $2.000 $11.233
OHDACA DSCA $1.300 $0.231 $0.852 $1.182 $0.775 $0.004 $4.344
CRSP OSD $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.750 $0.750 $1.490 $2.990
CN OSD $0.200 $0.900 $1.200 $0.374 $0.035 $0.000 $2.709
Section 2282 OSD $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $2.360 $2.360
JCET SOCOM $0.300 $0.700 $0.000 $0.300 $0.300 $0.400 $2.000
TCA EUCOM $0.400 $0.240 $0.510 $0.140 $0.572 $0.071 $1.933
CTFP DSCA $0.000 $0.075 $0.075 $0.429 $0.621 $0.600 $1.800
ERF EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.559 $1.231 $1.790
ICP DTRA $0.400 $0.200 $0.030 $0.180 $0.300 $0.236 $1.346
PDP EUCOM $0.100 $1.000 $0.020 $0.020 $0.020 $0.100 $1.260
AEECA DOS $0.800 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.800
NADR DOS $0.400 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.400
HCA EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.051 $0.068 $0.058 $0.177
BPC EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.058 $0.080 $0.019 $0.157
CDI EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.100 $0.030 $0.021 $0.151
HMA DSCA $0.100 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.100
DEIC OSD $0.030 $0.000 $0.000 $0.042 $0.016 $0.000 $0.088
TOTAL $16.387 $15.228 $17.340 $20.489 $31.501 $14.478 $115.423
149
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Croatia
Section 1206 OSD $5.148 $5.115 $5.856 $5.432 $9.179 $0.000 $30.730
CSF OSD $5.271 $2.048 $4.695 $4.922 $0.000 $0.000 $16.936
FMF DOS $2.500 $3.493 $2.500 $2.374 $2.500 $2.500 $15.867
IMET DOS $0.800 $0.956 $0.946 $1.024 $1.135 $1.131 $5.992
NADR DOS $0.450 $0.450 $1.500 $1.300 $0.000 $0.000 $3.700
OHDACA DSCA $0.700 $0.000 $0.000 $0.920 $1.200 $0.453 $3.273
JCET SOCOM $0.600 $0.300 $1.150 $0.120 $0.150 $0.130 $2.450
GPOI DOS $0.800 $0.884 $0.000 $0.400 $0.000 $0.000 $2.084
CRSP OSD $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.465 $0.465 $0.350 $1.280
TCA EUCOM $0.500 $0.310 $0.190 $0.040 $0.137 $0.037 $1.214
ICP DTRA $0.200 $0.500 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.450 $1.150
PDP EUCOM $0.600 $0.300 $0.040 $0.040 $0.040 $0.000 $1.020
ERC JS $0.000 $0.360 $0.300 $0.280 $0.000 $0.000 $0.940
HMA DSCA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.462 $0.462 $0.000 $0.924
ERF EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.690 $0.690
HCA EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.072 $0.091 $0.079 $0.242
CN OSD $0.000 $0.000 $0.212 $0.000 $0.000 $0.001 $0.213
BPC EUCOM $0.120 $0.010 $0.032 $0.029 $0.005 $0.000 $0.196
CTFP DSCA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.085 $0.043 $0.046 $0.174
PSI DTRA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.045 $0.045 $0.045 $0.135
DEIC OSD $0.020 $0.000 $0.000 $0.046 $0.036 $0.000 $0.102
CDI EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.036 $0.000 $0.036
WIF DSCA $0.035 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.035
CP2E DTRA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.002 $0.000 $0.002
TOTAL $17.744 $14.726 $17.583 $18.122 $15.674 $6.747 $90.596
150
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Cyprus
ESF DOS $11.000 $8.362 $3.500 $2.925 $0.000 $0.000 $25.787
NADR DOS $0.000 $0.500 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.500
HMA DSCA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.038 $0.038 $0.180 $0.256
PSI DTRA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.015 $0.015
CTFP DSCA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.005 $0.000 $0.005
TOTAL $11.000 $8.862 $3.500 $2.963 $0.043 $0.195 $26.563
151
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Czech Republic
Section 1206 OSD $0.000 $10.780 $3.280 $16.863 $8.392 $0.000 $39.315
FMF DOS $6.000 $5.988 $5.000 $4.747 $3.000 $1.000 $25.735
IMET DOS $1.900 $1.992 $1.892 $1.752 $1.800 $1.748 $11.084
CRSP OSD $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.650 $0.650 $1.250 $2.550
PDP EUCOM $0.000 $0.500 $0.470 $0.470 $0.470 $0.400 $2.310
JCET SOCOM $0.300 $0.000 $0.400 $0.200 $0.200 $0.200 $1.300
TCA EUCOM $0.300 $0.160 $0.070 $0.020 $0.105 $0.022 $0.677
BPC EUCOM $0.080 $0.060 $0.017 $0.000 $0.003 $0.019 $0.179
CTFP DSCA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.091 $0.040 $0.035 $0.166
TOTAL $8.580 $19.480 $11.129 $24.793 $14.776 $4.822 $83.580
152
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Denmark
PDP EUCOM $0.100 $0.500 $0.060 $0.630 $0.630 $1.200 $3.120
JCET SOCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.350 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.350
TOTAL $0.100 $0.500 $0.410 $0.630 $0.630 $1.200 $3.470
153
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Estonia
Section 1206 OSD $5.003 $2.639 $4.960 $4.034 $3.314 $0.000 $19.950
FMF DOS $2.500 $2.695 $2.400 $2.279 $2.400 $1.500 $13.774
IMET DOS $1.100 $1.143 $1.212 $1.134 $1.211 $1.227 $7.027
JCET SOCOM $0.000 $0.000 $1.500 $0.600 $0.500 $0.600 $3.200
CRSP OSD $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $1.570 $1.570 $0.000 $3.140
Section 2282 OSD $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $2.923 $2.923
OHDACA DSCA $0.400 $0.000 $0.650 $0.000 $0.000 $0.500 $1.550
DHAPP DOS $0.200 $0.272 $0.050 $0.200 $0.200 $0.200 $1.122
HMA DSCA $0.200 $0.500 $0.100 $0.107 $0.107 $0.054 $1.068
PDP EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.690 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.690
ERC JS $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.640 $0.640
TCA EUCOM $0.100 $0.110 $0.150 $0.060 $0.135 $0.025 $0.580
ICP DTRA $0.200 $0.200 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.400
CTFP DSCA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.235 $0.091 $0.030 $0.356
BPC EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.019 $0.007 $0.001 $0.027
DEIC OSD $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.024 $0.024
CP2E DTRA $0.000 $0.000 $0.010 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.010
TOTAL $9.703 $7.608 $11.876 $10.385 $9.675 $7.724 $56.971
154
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Finland
JCET SOCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.300 $0.300 $0.300 $0.900
TOTAL $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.300 $0.300 $0.300 $0.900
155
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
France
CTFP DSCA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.009 $0.009
TOTAL $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.103 $0.000 $0.009 $0.112
156
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Georgia
CBEP DTRA $54.700 $44.700 $41.600 $40.745 $35.073 $18.549 $235.367
AEECA DOS $59.000 $68.660 $66.700 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $194.360
MCC DOS $77.273 $38.636 $0.000 $0.000 $28.000 $28.000 $171.909
CRSP OSD $39.000 $8.400 $70.100 $6.035 $6.035 $18.480 $148.050
ESF DOS $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $42.468 $39.400 $38.266 $120.134
FMF DOS $16.000 $15.968 $14.400 $13.672 $12.000 $10.000 $82.040
WMD-PPP DTRA $0.000 $8.887 $22.175 $0.000 $3.704 $6.700 $41.466
Section 1206 OSD $18.484 $18.758 $2.835 $0.075 $0.000 $0.000 $40.152
INCLE DOS $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $5.565 $3.947 $3.500 $13.012
IMET DOS $1.800 $1.895 $1.879 $1.799 $1.791 $2.165 $11.329
NADR DOS $1.300 $2.575 $2.000 $1.840 $0.000 $0.000 $7.715
OHDACA DSCA $0.800 $0.752 $1.281 $0.952 $0.685 $0.965 $5.435
GHP DOS $0.000 $0.850 $0.450 $3.664 $0.000 $0.000 $4.964
WIF DSCA $0.273 $0.409 $0.531 $0.309 $0.506 $0.565 $2.593
ICP DTRA $0.700 $0.200 $0.300 $0.300 $0.150 $0.246 $1.896
JCET SOCOM $0.000 $0.500 $0.000 $0.200 $0.200 $0.200 $1.100
GHCS DOS $0.850 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.850
CTFP DSCA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.245 $0.358 $0.225 $0.828
ERF EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.644 $0.000 $0.644
TCA EUCOM $0.000 $0.250 $0.190 $0.060 $0.103 $0.026 $0.629
CDI EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.020 $0.025 $0.353 $0.155 $0.553
DHAPP DOS $0.154 $0.163 $0.150 $0.010 $0.000 $0.000 $0.477
CP2E DTRA $0.000 $0.000 $0.015 $0.000 $0.308 $0.000 $0.323
BPC EUCOM $0.070 $0.030 $0.052 $0.008 $0.036 $0.000 $0.196
ERC JS $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.150 $0.000 $0.000 $0.150
HCA EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.026 $0.040 $0.031 $0.097
CN OSD $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.063 $0.000 $0.063
HMA DSCA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.021 $0.021
TOTAL $270.404 $211.633 $225.102 $118.401 $133.621 $128.346 $1,087.507
157
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Germany
CP2E DTRA $0.594 $0.515 $0.335 $0.619 $0.615 $0.236 $2.914
CTFP DSCA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.015 $0.015
TOTAL $0.594 $0.515 $0.335 $0.619 $0.761 $0.251 $3.075
158
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Greece
JCET SOCOM $0.000 $0.700 $0.350 $1.500 $1.500 $1.700 $5.750
CN OSD $0.100 $0.475 $0.500 $0.000 $0.242 $0.081 $1.398
IMET DOS $0.100 $0.098 $0.102 $0.093 $0.097 $0.200 $0.690
CTFP DSCA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.085 $0.120 $0.100 $0.305
PSI DTRA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.015 $0.045 $0.060
BPC EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.013 $0.013
DEIC OSD $0.010 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.010
TOTAL $0.210 $1.273 $0.952 $1.678 $1.974 $2.139 $8.226
159
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Hungary
Section 1206 OSD $8.181 $2.902 $11.967 $7.727 $2.326 $0.000 $33.103
Section 2282 OSD $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $7.220 $7.220
PDP EUCOM $1.000 $1.000 $1.210 $1.210 $1.210 $1.200 $6.830
IMET DOS $1.000 $1.077 $0.947 $1.044 $1.152 $0.993 $6.213
FMF DOS $1.000 $0.998 $0.900 $0.854 $0.450 $0.000 $4.202
CRSP OSD $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.940 $0.940 $0.890 $2.770
CTFP DSCA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.784 $0.183 $0.090 $1.057
GSCF DOS $0.000 $0.000 $1.033 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $1.033
JCET SOCOM $0.200 $0.000 $0.400 $0.000 $0.000 $0.100 $0.700
TCA EUCOM $0.100 $0.120 $0.080 $0.040 $0.026 $0.012 $0.378
CSF OSD $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.229 $0.000 $0.000 $0.229
TOTAL $11.481 $6.097 $16.537 $12.828 $6.448 $10.904 $64.295
160
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Iceland
CTFP DSCA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.003 $0.003
TOTAL $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.003 $0.003
161
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Ireland
ESF DOS $17.000 $2.500 $2.500 $2.090 $1.250 $0.750 $26.090
CTFP DSCA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.003 $0.003
TOTAL $17.000 $2.500 $2.500 $2.090 $1.250 $0.753 $26.093
162
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Israel
FMF-Israel DOS $2,775.000 $2,994.000 $3,075.000 $3,100.000 $3,100.000 $3,100.000 $18,144.000
MRA DOS $25.000 $25.000 $20.000 $19.320 $10.680 $10.000 $110.000
ERC JS $0.350 $0.630 $0.830 $1.180 $1.140 $0.390 $4.520
IASP DOS $0.375 $0.418 $0.375 $0.377 $0.013 $0.024 $1.582
JCET SOCOM $0.500 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.500
CDI EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.018 $0.052 $0.070
DEIC OSD $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.020 $0.040 $0.060
TOTAL $2,801.225 $3,020.048 $3,096.205 $3,120.877 $3,111.871 $3,110.506 $18,260.732
163
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Italy
JCET SOCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.350 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.350
CP2E DTRA $0.017 $0.092 $0.059 $0.051 $0.000 $0.000 $0.219
CTFP DSCA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.013 $0.033 $0.012 $0.058
TOTAL $0.017 $0.092 $0.409 $0.064 $0.033 $0.012 $0.627
164
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Kosovo
AEECA DOS $95.000 $79.000 $63.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $237.000
ESF DOS $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $46.151 $37.891 $28.450 $112.492
INCLE DOS $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $11.751 $10.674 $10.600 $33.025
FMF DOS $2.500 $5.000 $3.000 $2.848 $4.000 $4.400 $21.748
OHDACA DSCA $0.600 $2.359 $0.886 $0.353 $0.000 $1.256 $5.454
IMET DOS $0.700 $0.678 $0.810 $0.819 $0.750 $0.737 $4.494
NADR DOS $1.070 $0.750 $0.800 $0.750 $0.000 $0.000 $3.370
ICP DTRA $0.400 $0.200 $0.450 $0.150 $0.000 $0.000 $1.200
HMA DSCA $0.100 $0.300 $0.100 $0.051 $0.051 $0.120 $0.722
CN OSD $0.000 $0.143 $0.193 $0.110 $0.000 $0.112 $0.558
TCA EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.120 $0.020 $0.187 $0.088 $0.415
CDI EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.100 $0.085 $0.031 $0.216
CTFP DSCA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.059 $0.081 $0.058 $0.198
BPC EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.053 $0.069 $0.009 $0.131
DEIC OSD $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.032 $0.000 $0.000 $0.032
WIF DSCA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.031 $0.031
TOTAL $100.370 $88.430 $69.359 $63.457 $53.998 $46.028 $421.642
165
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Latvia
Section 1206 OSD $2.511 $6.346 $2.829 $5.150 $11.449 $0.000 $28.285
FMF DOS $2.500 $2.794 $2.248 $2.134 $2.250 $1.500 $13.426
Section 2282 OSD $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $11.065 $11.065
IMET DOS $1.100 $1.135 $1.129 $1.151 $1.267 $1.228 $7.010
OHDACA DSCA $2.900 $1.014 $0.876 $0.308 $0.422 $0.482 $6.002
ERC JS $0.940 $0.530 $0.000 $0.010 $0.340 $1.620 $3.440
CRSP OSD $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.375 $0.375 $0.890 $1.640
PDP EUCOM $0.000 $0.100 $0.340 $0.340 $0.340 $0.400 $1.520
TCA EUCOM $0.200 $0.110 $0.070 $0.070 $0.415 $0.056 $0.921
JCET SOCOM $0.200 $0.000 $0.400 $0.100 $0.100 $0.100 $0.900
HCA EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.128 $0.252 $0.162 $0.542
CTFP DSCA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.088 $0.075 $0.028 $0.191
CN OSD $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.050 $0.050
DEIC OSD $0.020 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.013 $0.000 $0.033
BPC EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.026 $0.026
TOTAL $10.371 $12.029 $7.892 $10.115 $17.455 $17.607 $75.469
166
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Lithuania
Section 1206 OSD $2.290 $3.883 $12.477 $8.530 $10.012 $0.000 $37.192
FMF DOS $2.700 $2.994 $2.550 $2.420 $2.549 $1.500 $14.713
IMET DOS $1.100 $1.143 $1.125 $1.140 $1.225 $1.198 $6.931
Section 2282 OSD $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $5.180 $5.180
PDP EUCOM $1.400 $0.200 $0.590 $0.750 $0.750 $1.200 $4.890
JCET SOCOM $0.600 $0.200 $0.000 $1.250 $1.250 $1.250 $4.550
CRSP OSD $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.900 $0.900 $0.320 $2.120
ERC JS $0.000 $0.040 $0.350 $0.270 $0.490 $0.420 $1.570
HMA DSCA $0.160 $0.300 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $1.033 $1.493
TCA EUCOM $0.200 $0.140 $0.080 $0.020 $0.276 $0.011 $0.727
ICP DTRA $0.300 $0.200 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.200 $0.700
BPC EUCOM $0.090 $0.010 $0.055 $0.013 $0.065 $0.001 $0.234
CDI EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.123 $0.123
CTFP DSCA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.027 $0.028 $0.003 $0.058
TOTAL $8.840 $9.110 $17.580 $16.035 $17.744 $12.641 $81.950
167
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Macedonia
AEECA DOS $22.000 $22.500 $14.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $58.500
FMF DOS $4.000 $3.992 $3.600 $3.418 $3.600 $4.000 $22.610
ESF DOS $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $10.187 $5.207 $3.665 $19.059
IMET DOS $0.950 $1.041 $1.064 $1.002 $1.070 $1.157 $6.284
INCLE DOS $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $1.893 $1.786 $1.600 $5.279
WIF DSCA $0.447 $0.520 $0.705 $0.357 $0.288 $0.257 $2.574
NADR DOS $1.020 $0.520 $0.500 $0.470 $0.000 $0.000 $2.510
CN OSD $0.200 $0.000 $0.000 $0.144 $0.019 $1.522 $1.885
TCA EUCOM $0.300 $0.120 $0.460 $0.030 $0.081 $0.031 $1.022
GPOI DOS $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.400 $0.200 $0.300 $0.900
OHDACA DSCA $0.500 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.400 $0.900
ICP DTRA $0.400 $0.200 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.600
CTFP DSCA $0.050 $0.075 $0.075 $0.090 $0.112 $0.068 $0.470
CRSP OSD $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.130 $0.130 $0.090 $0.350
BPC EUCOM $0.080 $0.020 $0.021 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.121
HCA EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.034 $0.000 $0.034
CDI EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.030 $0.030
TOTAL $29.947 $28.988 $20.425 $18.296 $12.786 $13.302 $123.744
168
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Malta
Section 1206 OSD $0.000 $1.568 $1.250 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $2.818
FMF DOS $0.455 $0.399 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.854
IMET DOS $0.150 $0.153 $0.150 $0.152 $0.147 $0.100 $0.852
NADR DOS $0.400 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.400
CN OSD $0.200 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.200
CTFP DSCA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.007 $0.033 $0.040
TOTAL $1.205 $2.120 $1.400 $0.152 $0.154 $0.133 $5.164
169
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Moldova
MCC DOS $4.125 $52.400 $52.400 $52.400 $52.400 $52.400 $266.125
AEECA DOS $19.000 $20.000 $21.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $60.000
ESF DOS $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $16.481 $15.050 $15.050 $46.581
WMD-PPP DTRA $0.000 $0.000 $13.685 $3.715 $6.928 $1.665 $25.993
INCLE DOS $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $3.062 $3.230 $2.800 $9.092
FMF DOS $0.750 $1.497 $1.250 $1.187 $1.250 $1.250 $7.184
OHDACA DSCA $1.200 $0.845 $0.805 $1.118 $0.700 $0.541 $5.209
IMET DOS $0.660 $0.898 $0.860 $0.725 $0.779 $1.139 $5.061
GPOI DOS $0.000 $0.000 $1.675 $0.770 $0.600 $0.950 $3.995
WIF DSCA $0.157 $0.208 $0.283 $0.247 $0.205 $0.393 $1.493
NADR DOS $0.290 $0.400 $0.400 $0.400 $0.000 $0.000 $1.490
TCA EUCOM $0.300 $0.410 $0.170 $0.070 $0.065 $0.030 $1.045
HMA DSCA $0.200 $0.000 $0.000 $0.082 $0.082 $0.132 $0.496
ERF EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.235 $0.235
CTFP DSCA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.124 $0.018 $0.060 $0.202
HCA EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.029 $0.084 $0.063 $0.176
GL&S OSD $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.094 $0.042 $0.136
DHAPP DOS $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.040 $0.040 $0.040 $0.120
PSI DTRA $0.000 $0.000 $0.045 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.045
CDI EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.015 $0.015 $0.030
TOTAL $26.682 $76.778 $92.782 $80.645 $81.723 $76.985 $435.595
170
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Montenegro
AEECA DOS $8.500 $8.000 $3.100 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $19.600
FMF DOS $1.200 $1.472 $1.200 $1.139 $1.200 $1.200 $7.411
OHDACA DSCA $1.400 $0.414 $0.992 $0.795 $1.060 $1.077 $5.738
INCLE DOS $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $1.831 $1.826 $1.500 $5.157
NADR DOS $0.500 $1.000 $1.500 $1.400 $0.000 $0.000 $4.400
IMET DOS $0.400 $0.455 $0.574 $0.569 $0.596 $0.613 $3.207
ESF DOS $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.823 $0.374 $0.130 $1.327
WIF DSCA $0.125 $0.140 $0.331 $0.177 $0.264 $0.154 $1.191
HMA DSCA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.180 $0.180 $0.428 $0.788
ICP DTRA $0.200 $0.200 $0.300 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.700
TCA EUCOM $0.000 $0.190 $0.220 $0.050 $0.233 $0.000 $0.693
CN OSD $0.200 $0.090 $0.090 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.380
CRSP OSD $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.260 $0.260
CTFP DSCA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.087 $0.070 $0.022 $0.179
DEIC OSD $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.013 $0.000 $0.013
TOTAL $12.525 $11.961 $8.307 $7.216 $6.020 $5.384 $51.413
171
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
NATO
CDI EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.010 $0.050 $0.063 $0.127 $0.250
TOTAL $0.000 $0.000 $0.010 $0.050 $0.063 $0.127 $0.250
172
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
The Netherlands
CP2E DTRA $0.000 $0.000 $0.099 $0.000 $0.203 $0.000 $0.302
TOTAL $0.000 $0.000 $0.099 $0.000 $0.203 $0.000 $0.302
173
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Norway
JCET SOCOM $0.700 $0.000 $0.600 $0.400 $0.400 $0.400 $2.500
CTFP DSCA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.006 $0.006
TOTAL $0.700 $0.000 $0.600 $0.400 $0.400 $0.406 $2.506
174
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
OSCE
ESF DOS $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $16.445 $23.000 $22.131 $61.576
TOTAL $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $16.445 $23.000 $22.131 $61.576
175
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Poland
FMF DOS $47.000 $33.932 $24.165 $18.989 $14.000 $9.000 $147.086
Section 1206 OSD $10.180 $1.569 $15.819 $10.766 $0.951 $0.000 $39.285
IMET DOS $2.200 $2.090 $2.100 $1.895 $2.000 $1.996 $12.281
JCET SOCOM $1.500 $0.200 $1.200 $2.300 $1.500 $3.550 $10.250
PDP EUCOM $3.200 $1.300 $1.420 $1.420 $1.420 $1.200 $9.960
ESF DOS $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $5.893 $0.000 $3.000 $8.893
CRSP OSD $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $1.575 $1.575 $0.000 $3.150
AEECA DOS $0.000 $0.000 $3.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $3.000
TCA EUCOM $0.600 $0.440 $0.240 $0.060 $0.199 $0.092 $1.631
CTFP DSCA $0.000 $0.100 $0.100 $0.085 $0.020 $0.101 $0.406
BPC EUCOM $0.050 $0.020 $0.152 $0.037 $0.018 $0.000 $0.277
TOTAL $64.730 $39.651 $48.196 $43.020 $21.683 $19.027 $236.307
176
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Portugal
IMET DOS $0.100 $0.093 $0.025 $0.093 $0.081 $0.090 $0.482
CTFP DSCA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.011 $0.002 $0.013
TOTAL $0.100 $0.375 $0.145 $0.093 $0.092 $0.092 $0.897
177
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Romania
Section 1206 OSD $10.640 $2.559 $17.875 $9.790 $19.165 $18.550 $78.579
FMF DOS $12.999 $12.974 $12.000 $11.391 $8.000 $5.400 $62.764
Section 2282 OSD $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $18.550 $18.550
IMET DOS $1.700 $1.750 $1.754 $1.614 $1.737 $1.696 $10.251
PDP EUCOM $1.700 $2.300 $0.550 $0.550 $0.880 $1.200 $7.180
CRSP OSD $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $2.590 $2.590 $1.230 $6.410
JCET SOCOM $1.500 $1.100 $1.500 $0.700 $0.700 $0.700 $6.200
ERF EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $1.990 $1.837 $3.827
OHDACA DSCA $0.800 $0.010 $0.715 $0.000 $0.305 $0.570 $2.400
TCA EUCOM $0.600 $0.410 $0.450 $0.240 $0.424 $0.050 $2.174
GL&S OSD $0.306 $0.320 $0.340 $0.340 $0.340 $0.321 $1.967
CN OSD $0.200 $0.776 $0.000 $0.406 $0.008 $0.000 $1.390
ERC JS $0.240 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.450 $0.490 $1.180
GSCF DOS $0.000 $0.000 $1.033 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $1.033
ICP DTRA $0.300 $0.000 $0.200 $0.200 $0.030 $0.124 $0.854
HMA DSCA $0.200 $0.300 $0.200 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.700
CTFP DSCA $0.000 $0.075 $0.075 $0.328 $0.074 $0.068 $0.620
HCA EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.464 $0.015 $0.055 $0.534
BPC EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.032 $0.075 $0.033 $0.140
CDI EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.020 $0.100 $0.012 $0.007 $0.139
CSF OSD $0.000 $0.000 $0.012 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.012
TOTAL $31.185 $22.574 $37.186 $29.874 $37.257 $52.286 $210.362
178
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Russia
AEECA DOS $59.000 $56.100 $52.300 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $167.400
GNS DTRA $0.000 $64.500 $63.900 $5.313 $10.400 $1.000 $145.113
SOAE DTRA $0.000 $64.500 $63.900 $5.313 $0.000 $0.000 $133.713
NWTS DTRA $37.500 $37.500 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $75.000
NWSS DTRA $50.500 $9.600 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $60.100
CWD DTRA $8.000 $12.000 $9.800 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $29.800
GHCS DOS $11.500 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $11.500
GHP DOS $0.000 $10.788 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $10.788
CBEP DTRA $3.300 $4.400 $0.000 $2.000 $0.000 $0.000 $9.700
NADR DOS $1.000 $1.000 $0.800 $0.800 $0.000 $0.000 $3.600
IMET DOS $0.095 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.095
TCA EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.060 $0.024 $0.000 $0.084
CN OSD $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.005 $0.000 $0.000 $0.005
TOTAL $170.895 $260.388 $190.700 $13.491 $10.424 $1.000 $646.898
179
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Serbia
AEECA DOS $49.000 $48.000 $33.500 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $130.500
ESF DOS $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $22.271 $14.877 $7.250 $44.398
FMF DOS $1.000 $1.896 $1.800 $1.709 $1.800 $1.800 $10.005
GPOI DOS $0.000 $2.100 $3.500 $0.700 $0.450 $2.425 $9.175
INCLE DOS $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $3.517 $3.000 $2.250 $8.767
NADR DOS $1.000 $1.150 $2.700 $2.400 $0.000 $0.000 $7.250
IMET DOS $0.900 $0.893 $0.887 $0.875 $0.878 $0.867 $5.300
OHDACA DSCA $2.000 $0.713 $0.344 $0.559 $0.590 $0.400 $4.606
ICP DTRA $0.900 $0.500 $0.100 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $1.500
WIF DSCA $0.158 $0.234 $0.315 $0.290 $0.201 $0.218 $1.416
TCA EUCOM $0.400 $0.290 $0.190 $0.040 $0.173 $0.025 $1.118
CN OSD $0.200 $0.250 $0.250 $0.068 $0.000 $0.000 $0.768
DHAPP DOS $0.100 $0.127 $0.125 $0.125 $0.125 $0.125 $0.727
CTFP DSCA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.274 $0.065 $0.038 $0.377
HCA EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.117 $0.117
BPC EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.006 $0.014 $0.000 $0.020
TOTAL $55.658 $56.153 $43.711 $32.834 $22.276 $15.644 $226.276
180
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Slovakia
Section 1206 OSD $0.093 $0.275 $0.305 $9.909 $0.000 $0.000 $10.582
IMET DOS $0.900 $0.950 $1.003 $0.946 $0.897 $0.942 $5.638
FMF DOS $1.250 $1.397 $1.000 $0.949 $0.450 $0.000 $5.046
PDP EUCOM $0.000 $0.500 $0.480 $0.480 $0.480 $0.450 $2.390
JCET SOCOM $0.200 $0.400 $0.700 $0.350 $0.330 $0.350 $2.330
GSCF DOS $0.000 $0.000 $1.034 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $1.034
CRSP OSD $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.235 $0.235 $0.440 $0.910
TCA EUCOM $0.200 $0.140 $0.100 $0.020 $0.000 $0.007 $0.467
ICP DTRA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.139 $0.139
BPC EUCOM $0.050 $0.050 $0.012 $0.004 $0.012 $0.000 $0.128
DEIC OSD $0.030 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.030
CTFP DSCA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.020 $0.000 $0.003 $0.023
TOTAL $2.723 $3.849 $4.884 $12.913 $2.404 $2.523 $29.296
181
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Slovenia
IMET DOS $0.700 $0.712 $0.669 $0.612 $0.717 $0.602 $4.012
FMF DOS $0.500 $0.748 $0.450 $0.427 $1.550 $0.000 $3.675
GPOI DOS $0.000 $0.000 $1.190 $0.840 $0.450 $0.800 $3.280
CRSP OSD $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.635 $0.635 $0.000 $1.270
Section 1206 OSD $0.221 $0.395 $0.344 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.960
TCA EUCOM $0.200 $0.110 $0.170 $0.030 $0.085 $0.000 $0.595
ERC JS $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.490 $0.490
HMA DSCA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.135 $0.135 $0.000 $0.270
CTFP DSCA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.137 $0.112 $0.013 $0.262
BPC EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.013 $0.013
TOTAL $1.621 $1.965 $2.823 $2.816 $3.684 $2.046 $14.955
182
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Spain
CTFP DSCA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.008 $0.007 $0.005 $0.020
CP2E DTRA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.006 $0.006
TOTAL $0.000 $0.000 $0.257 $0.086 $0.183 $0.143 $0.669
183
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Sweden
JCET SOCOM $0.300 $0.700 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $1.000
CTFP DSCA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.015 $0.000 $0.003 $0.018
TOTAL $0.300 $0.700 $0.000 $0.015 $0.000 $0.003 $1.018
184
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Switzerland
CTFP DSCA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.006 $0.006
TOTAL $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.006 $0.006
185
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Turkey
IMET DOS $5.000 $3.990 $3.839 $3.415 $3.274 $3.300 $22.818
NADR DOS $2.995 $1.425 $1.100 $0.850 $0.000 $0.000 $6.370
CTFP DSCA $0.200 $0.150 $0.150 $0.900 $0.758 $0.800 $2.958
CN OSD $0.200 $0.946 $0.701 $0.378 $0.427 $0.097 $2.749
JCET SOCOM $0.000 $0.200 $0.600 $0.400 $0.500 $0.500 $2.200
PDP EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.030 $0.030 $0.030 $0.200 $0.290
TOTAL $8.395 $6.711 $6.420 $5.973 $4.989 $5.148 $37.636
186
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Ukraine
ESF DOS $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $56.939 $54.000 $274.349 $385.288
CBEP DTRA $28.400 $33.800 $50.700 $32.748 $121.000 $5.000 $271.648
AEECA DOS $89.000 $86.000 $79.100 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $254.100
WMD-PPP DTRA $29.143 $31.472 $0.000 $0.010 $44.903 $0.000 $105.528
GHP DOS $0.000 $23.375 $13.153 $19.587 $19.515 $27.254 $102.884
FMF DOS $11.000 $8.982 $7.000 $6.646 $6.103 $47.000 $86.731
SOAE DTRA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $26.411 $5.720 $32.131
SNAE DTRA $21.800 $6.800 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $28.600
GSCF DOS $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $19.000 $0.000 $19.000
GHCS DOS $18.678 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $18.678
INCLE DOS $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $4.408 $4.100 $8.700 $17.208
IMET DOS $1.900 $1.925 $1.840 $1.811 $1.929 $1.889 $11.294
NADR DOS $2.500 $2.700 $2.500 $2.350 $0.000 $0.000 $10.050
GNS DTRA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $5.720 $5.720
WIF DSCA $1.406 $1.252 $0.901 $0.564 $0.689 $0.764 $5.576
OHDACA DSCA $1.000 $0.598 $0.590 $1.127 $0.635 $0.509 $4.459
ERC JS $0.000 $0.250 $0.460 $0.250 $0.000 $3.200 $4.160
MCC DOS $4.092 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $4.092
TCA EUCOM $0.000 $0.980 $0.310 $0.020 $0.063 $0.070 $1.443
DHAPP DOS $0.000 $0.000 $0.200 $0.200 $0.200 $0.200 $0.800
CN OSD $0.000 $0.080 $0.080 $0.000 $0.000 $0.120 $0.280
CTFP DSCA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.122 $0.012 $0.015 $0.149
Section 1206 OSD $0.056 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.056
CDI EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.028 $0.028
HMA DSCA $0.020 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.020
HCA EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.011 $0.000 $0.000 $0.011
CP2E DTRA $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.009 $0.009
BPC EUCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.009 $0.009
TOTAL $208.995 $198.214 $157.048 $127.020 $298.776 $380.556 $1,370.609
187
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
United Kingdom
JCET SOCOM $0.000 $0.000 $0.600 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.600
TOTAL $0.000 $0.000 $0.600 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.600
188
UNCLASSIFIED

Xid-4231132 1

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Xid-4231132 1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

UNCLASSIFIED

This page intentionally left blank

PDP – Partnership Development Program ............................................................................... 87

Germany .................................................................................................................................. 158

This page intentionally left blank

USEUCOM’s Annual Strategy Implementation Cycle

Purpose of this Handbook

This handbook describes TSC resourcing as it applies to the USEUCOM; it is an encyclopedic

Officers and members of the HQ USEUCOM and Component staffs involved in

USEUCOM Theater Campaign Plan, 24 Nov 2015

Key Terms and Definitions

The following terms are used in the context of this handbook.

Resources: Funding, manpower, equipment and/or facilities required to support an Activity.

Programming for TSC Resources

During the Congressional budget cycle, USEUCOM provides input to members of

TSC Activity Management

USEUCOM Resource Allocation Guidance

Annex C to USEUCOM TCP, Operations (Ref B) provides an overarching strategy implementation

ACSA – Acquisition and Cross-Servicing Agreements

 The means to meet logistics shortfall emergencies

ACSA Reference library: https://intellipedia.intelink.gov/wiki/ACSA

 Title 10, United States Code - Sections 2341-2350

Lines of Activity Supported:

EUCOM Acquisition & Cross-Servicing Agreement (ACSA) List as of 21 Sep 16

Slovenia USA-SVN-02 11-Nov-15 ACSA 2006 ACSA up to date

USEUCOM Point of Contact:

POCs Email Address

Anthony Munson, ECJ4 430-4509 anthony.r.munson.civ@mail.mil

BPC – Building Partnership Capacity

Engagements NOT authorized for BPC funding

 Direct support to foreign countries or providing equipment to foreign countries, including

Lines of Activity Supported:

 Multiple Lines of Activity supported due to Mil to Mil activity.

USEUCOM Funding History: All values are in millions of dollars

BPC FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17

Funding by Country/Theater: All values are in millions of dollars

Country FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16

USEUCOM Point of Contact:

POC Email Address

LTC Tom Fuller, ECJ5-SCP, 430-5656 thomas.b.fuller.mil@mail.mil

CCIF – CCDR Initiative Fund

Legal Basis and Implementing Regulations:

g. ECI 7000.02A, Administration and Control of Finances, Enclosure B, 24 March 2015

(f) Description of activities funded during FY12-14

USEUCOM Funding History: All values are in millions of dollars

CCIF FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17

Funding by Country/Theater: All values are in millions of dollars

CCIF FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16

USEUCOM Point of Contact:

POC Email Address

CDI – Combating Weapons of Mass Destruction (CWMD)

Engagements NOT authorized for CDI funding:

· U.S. MILPAY for program execution

Lines of Activity Supported:

 WMD Proliferation Prevention

USEUCOM Funding History: All values are in millions of dollars

CDI FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17

Funding by Country/Theater: All values are in millions of dollars

Country FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16

USEUCOM Points of Contact:

LTC William Sumner, ECJ5-W, 430-7875 william.e.sumner2.mil@mail.mil

LTC Joseph Kling, ECJ5-W, 430-7862 joseph.a.kling.mil@mail.mil

Humanitarian Assistance-Excess Property (HAP-EP): Section 2557 of Title 10 provides authority