Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Gaining an Understanding of
Make Preliminary Risk
the System of Internal Control
Assessments
(Chapter 6)
(Chapter 7)
Performing Tests of Controls Performing Substantive Procedures
(Chapter 8) (Chapter 9)
14-1
14-2 C h a pte r 14 Completing the Audit
Learning Objectives
LO 1 Apply the audit procedures used to search for loss LO 3 Describe engagement wrap-up procedures
contingencies. performed at the conclusion of the audit.
LO 2 Distinguish between the two types of material LO 4 Evaluate the going concern assumption for a client.
subsequent events and evaluate what effect they have LO 5 Discuss what reporting is required to management
on the financial statements, if any. and those charged with governance.
Every company, no matter how big or how small, faces risk of events happening today that
have consequences in the future. For example, the explosion of the Deepwater Horizon
offshore oil rig (operated by BP) in 2010 resulted in worker injuries and fatalities and dam-
age to the environment in the Gulf of Mexico. Many lawsuits against BP followed, and some
are still not resolved almost a decade after the incident. What is the proper accounting treat-
ment for a situation like this one in which the company could still be liable to many differ-
ent groups over an extended period of time? FASB ASC Topic 450, Contingencies, provides
accounting guidance for events, or potential events, that create uncertainty for a company.
FASB defines a loss contingency as an existing condition or situation involving uncertainty loss contingency an existing
as to possible loss that will ultimately be resolved when one or more future events occur condition or situation involving
or fail to occur. Some other examples of a loss contingency include income tax disputes uncertainty as to possible loss that
with the IRS, guarantees of debt of others, threat of expropriation of assets, and pending or will ultimately be resolved when
threatening litigation with employees, customers, vendors, or shareholders. one or more future events occur
or fail to occur
To account for a loss contingency, company management must determine the likelihood
that the future event will trigger a loss. FASB ASC Topic 450 classifies the likelihood of loss
contingencies into three categories:
1. Probable. The future event is likely to occur.
2. R
easonably possible. The chance of the future event occurring is more than remote but
less than likely.
3. Remote. The chance of the future event occurring is slight.
If management determines the loss contingency is probable and an amount can be reasonably
estimated, then the company must record a liability and a related expense or loss and disclose
the relevant details of the event in the notes to the financial statements. If the loss contingency
is reasonably possible or the amount cannot be reasonably estimated, then only a disclosure in
the notes is required. If the likelihood of a loss contingency is remote, then nothing needs to
be disclosed in the notes.
Since there is no crystal ball to see into the future, you can appreciate that determining
the likelihood of a loss contingency occurring and trying to estimate a reasonable amount for a
future loss involves significant judgment by management. Therefore, the role of auditors is to
14-4 C h a pte r 14 Completing the Audit
ILLUSTRATION 14.1
Risk assessment and risk Risk assessment and risk response procedures that can reveal the potential risk for loss
response procedures that may contingencies:
identify loss contingencies 1. Confirming with financial institutions, including guarantees of debt of others.
2. Inspecting the minutes of board of directors’ meetings.
3. Inspecting contracts, leases, and correspondence from governmental agencies.
4. Inspecting tax returns and correspondence with the IRS.
5. Inquiring of management regarding the completeness of recorded liabilities.
6. Inquiring of client’s legal counsel.
Toward the end of the audit, auditors perform an inquiry procedure specifically designed to
gather information about loss contingencies arising from litigation, claims, and assessments. Audi-
tors will communicate directly with the client’s external legal counsel by sending a letter of inquiry,
legal letter an audit inquiry often referred to as a legal letter. If the client has in-house legal counsel responsible for litigation,
sent to a client’s external and claims, and assessments, a legal letter will also be sent to the in-house legal counsel. Attorneys and
in-house legal counsel to obtain their clients have a privileged relationship. That means attorneys cannot talk about their client’s
information about litigation, cases to anyone without permission from the client. Therefore, before auditors can communicate
assessments, and claims with the client’s legal counsel, client management must give permission to the attorneys to discuss
their cases with the auditors. The client grants permission to the attorneys by signing the legal letter.
Legal letters are sent to all attorneys the client paid for legal services. AU-C 501 Audit
Evidence—Specific Considerations for Selected Items and AS 2505 Inquiry of a Client’s Lawyer
Concerning Litigation, Claims, and Assessments provide guidance for the content of the legal
letter. The objective of the legal letter is to gather audit evidence regarding the existence of
uncertainties arising from litigation, claims, and assessments; the time period in which the
cause for the legal action occurred; the probability of an unfavorable outcome for the client;
and an estimate of the potential loss. A legal letter used for the Cloud 9 audit is presented in
Illustration 14.2, followed by explanations of the bracketed numbers. The format and wording
of the letter is dictated by auditing standards, so all auditors will follow the same basic format.
ILLUSTRATION 14.2
Example of legal letter used [1] Cloud 9 Inc.
for Cloud 9 audit
[2] March 1, 2023
To Legal Counsel:
[4] In connection with an audit of our financial statements as of January 31, 2023, and for the year
then ended, please furnish our auditors, W&S Partners, P.O. Box 525, Seattle, WA 95688, with the
information requested below concerning contingencies involving matters with respect to which
you have devoted substantial attention on behalf of the company in the form of legal c onsultation
or representation.
Audit Procedures for Loss Contingencies 14-5
[5] Regarding pending or threatened litigation, claims, and assessments, please include in your ILLUSTRATION 14.2
response: (1) the nature of each matter, (2) the progress of each matter to date, (3) how the Com- (continued)
pany is responding or intends to respond (for example, to contest the case vigorously or seek an
out-of-court settlement), and (4) an evaluation of the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome and an
estimate, if one can be made, of the amount or range of potential loss. Accordingly, please furnish
to our auditors such explanation, if any, that you consider necessary to supplement the foregoing
information, including an explanation of those matters for which your views may differ from those
of management.
[6] We understand that whenever, in the course of performing legal services for us with respect
to a matter recognized to involve an unasserted possible claim or assessment that may call for
financial statement disclosure, you have formed a professional conclusion that we should disclose
or consider disclosure concerning such possible claim or assessment, as a matter of professional
responsibility to us, you will so advise us and will consult with us concerning the question of such
disclosure and the applicable requirements of FASB ASC 450. Please specifically confirm to our
auditors that our understanding is correct.
[7] Your response should include matters that existed as of January 31, 2023, and during the period
from that date to the effective date of your response. Please specifically identify the nature of and
reasons for any limitations on your response. Our auditors expect to have the audit completed
about March 15, 2023. They would appreciate receiving your reply by that date with a specified
effective date no earlier than March 7, 2023.
Sincerely,
[8]James W. Harley
Chief Executive Officer
Cloud 9 Inc.
Sections of the letter in Illustration 14.2 are numbered to correspond with the following
explanations:
1. Client letterhead—The legal letter is prepared on the client’s letterhead because the client
must grant permission for the attorneys to respond. Auditors oversee the preparation and
content of the letter and have control over the mailing and receipt of the letter.
2. Date of the letter—The letter is sent about mid-way through the completion of year-end
fieldwork.
3. Name and address of attorneys—A legal letter should be sent to all attorneys the client
hired during the year for legal services. Auditors can obtain a listing by inspecting the
transactions and invoices related to the client’s legal services expense account.
4. Request for information—This paragraph identifies the financial statements under audit
and states a request to supply information directly to the auditors.
5. Response regarding pending or threatened litigation—This paragraph requests that the
attorneys provide a list and description of pending or threatened litigation, claims, and
assessments. Notice auditors are seeking the attorney’s evaluation of the likelihood of an
unfavorable outcome and an estimate, if possible, of the potential loss.
6. Response regarding unasserted claims or assessments—This paragraph requests that the
attorneys confirm their responsibility to inform management of situations that may in-
volve possible unasserted claims or assessments that may require disclosure. Notice the
reference to the applicable financial reporting framework, which for Cloud 9 is GAAP.
7. Time frame for preparing the response—This paragraph specifies the time parameters for
the attorney’s response. The response should include matters that existed at January 31,
2023, and any matters after year-end up to the date of the attorney’s response letter. Ide-
ally, the date of the attorney’s response should coincide with the end of fieldwork, in this
case March 15, 2023, or very close to that date. Also, this paragraph requests the attorneys
state any reasons for limitations on their response.
8. Signature—The letter is signed by the client’s chief executive officer.
14-6 C h a pte r 14 Completing the Audit
The nature of the legal environment in the United States is such that it could take years
for a lawsuit or other action to be settled and/or resolved. Therefore, it may not be possible for
the legal counsel to evaluate the time frame of an outcome or a reasonable amount for a loss.
In many cases, just disclosure of the pending litigation, rather than accrual in the financial
statements, is the appropriate way to account for the uncertainty. (See the following Profes-
sional Environment segment for a real-world example.) If the attorneys refuse to respond
appropriately to the legal letter, then it is considered a limitation on the scope of the audit,
which may impact the opinion in the auditor’s report. If auditors cannot gather sufficient
appropriate evidence regarding loss contingencies, then it may not be possible to issue an
unmodified opinion. Situations causing modifications to the audit report will be discussed
in Chapter 15.
In the Starbucks fiscal year 2013 financial statements, another the estimated payment date, and attorneys’ fees to be
update of the dispute with Kraft was provided in Note 15. The re- approximately $556.6 million. As a result, we recorded
sults from the arbitration were released. When two parties agree a litigation charge (expense) of $2,784.1 million in our
to let a dispute be settled with arbitration, the decision from the fiscal year 2013 operating results.
arbitration is considered final. In other words, there is no appeal
The dispute was settled after being disclosed for two years. The
process by either party. Here is an excerpt from Note 15, fiscal
outcome was definitely unfavorable for Starbucks since it was
year 2013:
ordered to pay cash of $2.2 billion plus interest and attorney’s
On November 12, 2013, the arbitrator ordered Starbucks fees to Kraft. This is a great example of the uncertainty involved
to pay Kraft $2,227.5 million in damages plus prejudg- with litigation disputes and the subjectivity involved with deter-
ment interest and attorney’s fees. We have estimated pre- mining if a potential loss contingency should be accrued or just
judgement interest, which includes an accrual through disclosed.
Before You Go On
1.1 What is a loss contingency? Provide an example.
1.2 Explain the audit procedures used to identify loss contingencies.
1.3 List three items that are included in a legal letter and explain why each is important.
Subsequent Events
The financial statements are prepared by client management on the basis of conditions
existing at year-end, which would be December 31 for a calendar-year entity. As you have
learned in previous chapters, many of the substantive audit procedures are performed af-
ter the year-end date and up through the date of the audit report. How long is this period
of time between year-end and the audit report? The answer depends on whether the au-
dit is for a public company or private company. For public companies, the SEC has strict
deadlines for the filing of Form 10-K, which is the document that contains the company’s
audited annual financial statements. Illustration 14.3 summarizes the SEC’s filing dead-
lines for Form 10-K. For private companies, the timeline for completion of an audit varies
widely, depending on the needs of the users of the financial statements. The most com-
mon user of a private company’s financial statements is a bank or other lender. Typically,
debt covenants require audited financial statements anywhere from 90–120 days after the
company’s year-end.
14-8 C h a pte r 14 Completing the Audit
Since auditors usually conduct part of the audit during the 60–90 day period after year-
subsequent events events end, they should be alert to certain subsequent events that may occur between the date of
occurring between the date of the the financial statements and the date of the auditor’s report. Illustration 14.4 illustrates an
financial statements and the date example of the subsequent period for a calendar-year client whose audit is completed no more
of the auditor’s report than 60 days after year-end. Some subsequent events may affect amounts that are included in
the year-end financial statements. AU-C 560 Subsequent Events and Subsequently Discovered
Type I subsequent events
Facts and AS 2801 Subsequent Events address the auditor’s responsibilities related to subse-
conditions that existed at the
quent events. The standards distinguish between two types of subsequent events as follows:
date of the financial statements
and require adjustment to the
• T
ype I subsequent event—event that provides evidence of conditions that existed at
financial statements
the date of the financial statements. A Type I event requires an adjustment to the finan-
Type II subsequent events cial statements.
conditions that arose after the
date of the financial statements • T
ype II subsequent event—event that provides evidence of conditions that arose after
and may require disclosure in the the date of the financial statements. A Type II event does not require an adjustment to the
notes to the financial statements financial statements but may require disclosure in the notes to the financial statements.
An example of a Type I event would be the bankruptcy of a client’s customer after year-
end as a result of poor financial condition that existed as of the balance sheet date. If the
customer has a large accounts receivable balance on the client’s year-end balance sheet, then
management needs to reconsider the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. The al-
lowance balance and the related bad debt expense may need to be increased. Another example
would be the client receiving payment from an insurance company after year-end in resolu-
tion of a claim that was still in negotiations at year-end. Since the outcome of the negotiation
was in favor of the client, management should establish a receivable at year-end.
Type II subsequent events represent conditions and events that did not exist as of the
balance sheet date and do not require adjustment to the financial statements, but may be of
such significance as to require disclosure in the financial statements. For example, shortly
after year-end, management commits to purchasing another business. Purchasing another
business will probably add significant assets and debt to the balance sheet and may result in
changing the capital structure of the client. This commitment is significant and should be
mentioned in the notes. Another example would be the loss of a building or inventory as a
result of a fire or flood after year-end, and the client is underinsured. The situation, and an
estimate of the amount of loss not covered by insurance, should be disclosed in the notes.
Subsequent Events 14-9
Imperial Coffees, Inc. is a coffee roaster and direct sells its coffee through grocery stores, restau-
rants, and corporate-owned coffee cafes. For almost a decade, Imperial has experienced explosive
growth and has acquired smaller coffee roasters all over the United States and some international
locations. Imperial’s most recent fiscal year just ended, and its auditors are completing year-end
fieldwork. Jorge is an audit manager on the audit team and meets with Stephanie, Imperial’s
CFO, one month after year-end. Jorge says, “I know the board of directors just had its monthly
meeting. Are the minutes from the meeting available for me to review?” “Yes, I have them right
here,” says Stephanie. “I’ll go ahead and tell you the most important item that was discussed. The
board has decided to acquire the largest coffee roaster in Nicaragua, Central America. The acqui-
sition process will take several months, but should be completed this year. The board feels this is
an excellent strategic move because Nicaragua is the twelfth-largest coffee producer in the world.
Having operations in Nicaragua could help form strategic alliances with the coffee growers there,
which could lead to reduced costs for some of our coffee supply.”
Jorge relays this news to his audit team. Jorge asks Lincoln, a first-year audit associate, if
this event impacts the financial statements they are currently auditing. Lincoln says, “Well, it is
definitely important news that stakeholders should know about. But since the acquisition hasn’t
happened yet, I don’t think it should affect any accounts on the financial statements for the most
recent fiscal year. I do think it should be disclosed in the financial statements since the board has
made the decision and the financials have not yet been issued. Imperial management should draft
a disclosure to include in the notes to the financial statements.” “You are correct, Lincoln,” says
Jorge. “This is called a Type II subsequent event. Management will draft the disclosure and we
will review it.”
The objective of the auditors is to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence about
whether events occurring after the balance sheet date but before the auditor’s report date have
been identified and properly accounted for, if necessary. In the course of performing planned
substantive procedures after year-end, auditors may identify subsequent events. Auditing
standards require auditors to also conduct specific audit procedures to identify subsequent
events that may occur up through the date of the auditor’s report. Specific audit procedures to
identify subsequent events include:
When conducting inquiries of management and those charged with governance, auditors in-
quire about the current status of items that were accounted for on preliminary or estimated
data at the date of the financial statements. Circumstances or events may have occurred
after year-end that would affect estimates or assumptions used at the financial statement
date. Illustration 14.5 provides examples of inquiries of management on specific matters.
The nature of the specific procedures performed for the subsequent events review will
depend on the individual circumstances of each client. Auditors will also rely heavily on their
knowledge of the client’s business gained during the risk assessment phase of the audit. If audi-
tors identify subsequent events that require adjustment to, or disclosure in, the financial state-
ments, they must determine if each event has been properly reflected in the financial state-
ments as required by the appropriate financial reporting framework. If management refuses
14-10 C h a pte r 14 Completing the Audit
ILLUSTRATION 14.5
Examples of inquiries of Inquiries of management regarding subsequent events:
management regarding • Has the company entered into new commitments, borrowings, or guarantees?
subsequent events
• Have sales occurred or are sales planned that may affect the carrying value or classification
of assets?
• Are there any plans to issue new shares or debt instruments (debentures)?
• Have any assets been seized (or appropriated) by the government or destroyed by natural
disaster?
• Has any change in ownership occurred or is it contemplated?
• Have any unusual accounting adjustments been made or are they contemplated?
• Have any developments occurred regarding risk areas and contingencies?
• Have there been any significant assessments by tax authorities regarding tax assessments,
fines, and penalties?
• Have any events occurred that are relevant to the measurement of estimates or provisions
made in the financial statements?
to make an adjustment or a disclosure that is required for the financial statements to be fairly
presented, auditors would not be able to issue an unmodified audit report. Situations that pre-
vent the issuance of an unmodified audit report will be covered in more depth in Chapter 15.
Before You Go On
2.1 Describe the two types of subsequent events that must be considered as part of the audit of
the financial statements. Explain each type of subsequent event with an example.
2.2 Explain two types of subsequent events procedures an auditor may perform to identify a
subsequent event.
Engagement Wrap-Up
After performing audit procedures related to loss contingencies and subsequent events, au-
ditors are in a position to start wrapping up the audit. This is the audit team’s last chance to
Engagement Wrap-Up 14-11
evaluate audit evidence before forming an opinion on the financial statements and determin-
ing the appropriate independent auditor’s report to issue. This section will address conducting
final analytical procedures, final evaluation of audit findings, completion of working paper
reviews, engagement quality review, and completion of documentation.
Upon further examination, the audit team discovers that a purchasing clerk and accounts pay-
able clerk colluded to create a fictitious vendor for the purpose of misappropriating assets. The ad-
dress for the fictitious vendor belonged to the brother of the accounts payable clerk. Although the
checks that were written to the fictitious vendor were not material, the audit team reconsiders the
assessment of control risk. If controls were assessed as strong during interim testing, then how were
employees able to override the controls and create a fictitious vendor? Could there be a significant
deficiency or material weakness in internal control? Could other transactions be fraudulent? The au-
dit team will perform additional work regarding the controls over purchasing and accounts payable.
AS 2401 Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit and AU-C 240 Consid-
eration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit require auditors to report fraud to a level of
management at least one level above the level where the fraud occurred. If the fraud involves
senior management, auditors report it to those charged with governance, such as the audit
committee of the board of directors. From there, the responsibility falls on management or
those charged with governance to take action to address the fraud. Action may include calling
the proper law enforcement agency and/or firing the employee(s) involved in the fraud. If
management or those charged with governance fail to take action in a timely manner, auditors
should consider withdrawing from the engagement.
In some cases, auditors may determine that fraud is so pervasive in the business they
are unable to complete their audit procedures, or the fraud will have such an impact on the
client’s reputation they no longer wish to have the company as a client. In these rare cases,
any decision to withdraw from the engagement is not taken lightly, and extensive consultation
both internally within the audit firm and externally with the audit firm’s legal counsel will
occur before any action is taken. If the auditors withdraw, they will inform the appropriate lev-
el of management or those charged with governance and provide reasons for the withdrawal.
If the client is a public company, management must report a change of auditors, and the rea-
son for the change, to the SEC using Form 8-K.
1
C. Long, “Forensic Frenzy,” Charter, 78, no. 5 (June, 2007), pp. 20–22.
2
Long, 2007.
3
See for example, information about forensic accounting at www.forensic-accounting-information.com.
4
Long, 2007.
5
Long, 2007.
6
Long, 2007.
7
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners 2010, www.acfe.com.
8
G. Zuckerman, “For Group of Skeptics, the truth is Out There,” The Wall Street Journal (August 8, 2009).
http://webreprints.djreprints.com/2246630965260.html.
14-14 C h a pte r 14 Completing the Audit
Conclusion: The likely misstatements listed above are deemed to be immaterial, either individually or in their aggregate effects on the
individual accounts, the financial statements categories, or the financial statement totals to which they relate.
assets of $400,000. The result is 2.0%, which means the aggregate likely misstatement for cur-
rent assets is 2.0% of the total current assets. The conclusion of the auditors is at the bottom of
the working paper and states that all of the likely misstatements are deemed to be immaterial.
If uncorrected, immaterial misstatements do not exceed materiality for the financial
statements as a whole or at the class of transactions, account balance, or disclosure level,
there may be qualitative characteristics that cause auditors to evaluate them as material. For
example, if an immaterial misstatement is the result of fraud, auditors consider the impact on
other areas of the audit, as discussed in the above section “Reconsider Assessment of Control
Risk and Risk of Fraud.” Qualitative characteristics will vary by client and by circumstance.
Illustration 14.7 lists examples of situations that cause auditors to consider an uncorrected
misstatement material based on a qualitative characteristic.
ILLUSTRATION 14.7
Qualitative characteristics of immaterial misstatements:
Examples of qualitative
• Affects compliance with regulatory requirements. characteristics of immaterial
• Has the effect of increasing management compensation. misstatements
• Relates to items involving particular parties, such as individuals related to management.
• Changes a loss to income or income to loss.
• Affects compliance with debt covenants or other contracts.
• Results from the occurrence of fraud.
• Relates to the incorrect application of an accounting policy that is likely to have a material
effect on future periods.
• Affects whether the company meets a financial benchmark, such as analyst forecasts of earnings
per share.
The working papers include documentation of all misstatements accumulated during the
audit and whether they have been corrected. For the uncorrected misstatements, auditors
should thoroughly document the basis for their conclusions about whether the uncorrected
misstatements are material individually or in the aggregate. In Chapter 15, we discuss the
effect on the auditor’s report of uncorrected misstatements that are material to the financial
statements as a whole.
ILLUSTRATION 14.8
Items to consider when Working paper reviewer should consider whether:
reviewing working papers • Work has been performed in accordance with appropriate auditing standards.
• Significant findings or issues have been raised for further consideration or audit testing.
• Consultations among team members and others within or outside of the audit firm have taken
place, as needed, and the resulting conclusions have been documented.
• The nature, timing, and extent of the work performed are appropriate and do not need
revision.
• Work performed supports the conclusions reached and is appropriately documented.
• Evidence obtained is sufficient and appropriate to support the auditor’s report.
• Objectives of the engagement procedures have been achieved.
Once an audit team member has responded to the review notes, the appropriate supervisor
reviews the work to ensure the review item was satisfactorily addressed. If satisfied the reviewer
signs off on the working paper. Once completed, the review notes are removed from the audit file
because the working papers are required to stand on their own in terms of the conclusions reached
and the underlying evidence supporting those conclusions. Ultimately, auditors rely on their pro-
fessional judgment to determine if sufficient appropriate audit evidence has been obtained.
you have completed. However, there are a few instances in which you have not sufficiently doc-
umented your follow-up procedures. For example, to gather evidence about the client’s past due
accounts, the audit procedures from the audit program are:
You notated in the working papers that you examined the client’s correspondence with customers
who had large overdue balances. However, you did not put a copy of the correspondence in the
working papers to substantiate that your examination procedure was completed. You also docu-
mented that you spoke with an accounts receivable clerk about the status of overdue accounts. It
is more appropriate to inquire of the accounts receivable manager, someone with more authority,
regarding the status of the overdue accounts. You need to schedule a meeting with the accounts
receivable manager today, and be sure you take good notes so you can thoroughly document your
discussion in the working papers. Also, remember that inquiry alone is not sufficient. You will
need to corroborate any discussions with additional evidence.”
The engagement partner is responsible for the audit engagement and its performance and engagement partner partner
for the auditor’s report that is issued on behalf of the firm. As the audit is being performed, the or other person in the firm
engagement partner should conduct timely reviews of work completed on accounts, transactions, who is responsible for the audit
or disclosures that require extensive judgment or involve significant risks. If an item is considered engagement and its performance
a critical audit matter or is perhaps a contentious matter with management, it should be reviewed and for the auditor’s report that is
issued on behalf of the firm
as soon as possible so it is resolved on a timely basis. The engagement partner is not required to
review all audit documentation, but may choose to do so. The working papers should adequately
document that all reviews, including those performed by the partner, were completed.
Completion of Documentation
As we have discussed throughout the text, the working papers serve as documentation that the
audit work was completed. The working papers are the property of the audit firm and act as sup-
port for the auditor’s opinion. AU-C 230 Audit Documentation and AS 1215 Audit Documentation
provide guidance for the assembly and retention of the documentation. The working papers do
not have to be completely assembled and archived before the audit report release date. However,
the standards do provide a deadline for the complete assembly of the audit file and a time frame
for how long the audit file should be retained by the firm. Illustration 14.9 summarizes the time
frames for assembly and retention of the audit file for both public and private company audits.
After the audit report release date, no more audit procedures are performed. Assem-
bling the completed file includes administrative tasks such as sorting and organizing working
14-18 C h a pte r 14 Completing the Audit
papers, discarding old documentation that was replaced with updated documentation, and
signing off on completion of checklists related to assembling the file. After the audit file
assembly completion deadline, nothing should be deleted or removed from the audit file.
However, documentation can be added to the file after the assembly completion deadline. If
documentation is added, auditors must indicate who prepared the documentation, the date of
the addition, and the reason for adding it. For example, a firm’s documentation of the audit of
a public company client may be inspected by the PCAOB. If results from the inspection reveal
the need to add further explanation to an audit procedure that was performed, auditors could
add the documentation, noting who prepared it and the reason for adding it (AS 1215.16).
For firms that have multiple office locations, the office that issued the audit report is
responsible for retaining the audit file. Reasonable measures should be taken to ensure the
security of the data, both electronic data and any hard copies retained by the firm, especially
since it contains confidential client information.
Before You Go On
3.1 Explain why it is important to reassess materiality at the end of the audit.
3.2 What are some qualitative characteristics of misstatements that would cause auditors to
classify them as material?
3.3 What is an engagement quality control review? Why is this review important to the public
interest?
3.4 What is meant by “assembly and retention” of the audit files?
Going Concern
business for the foreseeable future with neither the intention nor the need for liquidation. As
a result, assets and liabilities are recorded on the basis that the entity will realize its assets and
discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business.
Management is responsible for evaluating going concern in accordance with the applica
ble financial reporting framework. Under GAAP, FASB ASC 205-40 Presentation of Financial
Statements—Going Concern requires management to make an assessment of the entity’s abil-
ity to continue as a going concern for the future period of one year beyond the issuance date
of the financial statements. Illustration 14.10 provides a timeline example to illustrate man-
agement’s responsibility. If the financial statements are dated December 31, 2022, the issuance
date will be 45 days or more after December 31, depending on when the audit is completed.
Supposing the financial statements are issued on March 1, 2023, the future period for man-
agement’s assessment of the risk of not being a going concern would be from March 1, 2023,
to March 1, 2024. If management determines there is substantial doubt about continuing as
a going concern, then management must make a note disclosure about the circumstances,
including any plans management may have to mitigate the situation.
ILLUSTRATION 14.10
Management’s evaluation period Management’s going concern
evaluation period
3/1/2023 3/1/2024
12/31/2022 Date the 12/31/2023
Financial financial
statement statements
date/fiscal are issued
year-end
date
Auditors have a responsibility to gather evidence regarding management’s process for eval-
uating going concern status and the appropriateness of management’s conclusions regarding it.
If management does not have a formal process in place, it could be considered a weakness in
internal control. Auditors also draw their own conclusions about whether there is substantial
doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time reasonable period of time
and, if applicable, evaluate the adequacy of any disclosure related to the entity’s circumstances. the period of time required by
What would be a reasonable period of time for the auditor’s evaluation? AU-C 570 The Auditor’s the applicable financial reporting
Consideration of an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern defines a reasonable period of framework, or if no such
time as the same period required by the client’s financial reporting framework. Therefore, under framework exists, for one year
after the date that the financial
GAAP, a reasonable period of time is one year from the date the client issues financial statements,
statements are issued
as shown in Illustration 14.10. (Current PCAOB AS 2415 defines a reasonable period of time as
one year from the date of the financial statements. Therefore, for public company audits, the time
frame for the auditor’s evaluation is shorter than for a private company client.)
According to AU-C 570, auditors do not have a responsibility to perform any audit pro-
cedures to identify going concern issues beyond the time period evaluated by management.
However, AU-C 570 does require that auditors inquire of management about any conditions
or events beyond the period of management’s evaluation that may have an effect on the
entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. For example, using Illustration 14.10, auditors
must inquire of management if there are any known conditions or events after March 1, 2024,
that could have an impact on going concern.
AU-C 570 and AS 2415 provide guidance for the auditor’s evaluation of the entity’s ability
to continue as a going concern. Audit procedures that are performed throughout the audit as
part of risk assessment and risk response should identify events or conditions that could sig-
nify going concern issues. Illustration 14.11 provides a list of audit procedures and examples
of the types of going concern issues that may be identified through the performance of routine
audit procedures. If one or more going concern issues are identified at any point during the
audit, auditors will use their professional judgment and consider the need to revise their risk
assessments and alter the nature, timing, or extent of audit procedures.
14-20 C h a pte r 14 Completing the Audit
If auditors determine there is substantial doubt about the entity continuing as a going
concern, the next step is obtaining information about management’s plans to mitigate or min-
imize the adverse effects of the situation. For example, if a client is experiencing a severe cash
shortage but has a letter from its bank agreeing to provide additional financing, the letter
reduces, but does not remove, the risk that the going concern assumption may be in doubt.
Other examples of mitigating factors include:
Auditors perform audit procedures to gather evidence about the mitigating factors and con-
sider whether the plans can be effectively implemented. For example, if management plans
to sell assets that have been used in operations, is there a market for the assets? How quickly
could they be sold and for how much? Would the sale of the assets be sufficient to enable the
entity to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time? Auditors draw upon
their knowledge of the entity, the industry, and their professional judgment when evaluating
the information to arrive at a conclusion.
After considering management’s plans, if auditors determine there is substantial doubt
about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, the next steps are to consider the
possible effects on the financial statements and on the auditor’s report. Regarding the finan-
cial statements, auditors evaluate the adequacy of management’s note disclosure about the
going concern issue. The disclosure should include a description of the conditions or events
causing the substantial doubt, management’s evaluation of the significance of those condi-
tions or events, and management’s plans to minimize the effects of the situation. Auditors
consider modifying the auditor’s report to further emphasize the substantial doubt about the
entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. This is something that investors or other key
stakeholders should know. You can understand that the client might not want any more atten-
tion brought to the situation because, in fact, it could make it more difficult for the client to
implement its plans for mitigating the situation. For example, obtaining alternative financing
may be more difficult if the auditor’s report is modified for a going concern issue. Noting these
conditions could also negatively impact the stock price for a public company. Given these
Management Representation and Communication with Those Charged with Governance 14-21
serious implications, auditors consider this decision very carefully. The specific modifications
that would be made to the auditor’s report are discussed in Chapter 15.
The final step is to communicate with those charged with governance. Those charged
with governance, such as a board of directors, probably already know about the situation, but
auditors still communicate the nature of the events that are causing doubt about the entity’s
ability to continue as a going concern. Auditors also discuss the note disclosure and other ef-
fects on the financial statements. If the auditors decide to issue a modified auditor’s report, it
should be communicated to those charged with governance.
Before You Go On
4.1 Explain the going concern assumption. How does it affect a company’s accounting?
4.2 List three factors that might indicate the going concern assumption may be at risk. What
audit procedures would detect the factors?
4.3 Explain some mitigating factors that could offset possible going concern issues.
Throughout the entire audit, auditors communicate often with management and other client
personnel in the process of gathering audit evidence. As the audit draws to a conclusion,
some required communications must take place with management and those charged with
governance, and the communications must be documented. The remainder of this section will
explain the management representation letter and the required communications with those
charged with governance.
written representation a
Management Representation Letter written statement by management
provided to the auditor to confirm
AU-C 580 Written Representations and AS 2805 Management Representations provide guid- certain matters or to support
ance about using written representations as audit evidence. A written representation is other audit evidence
14-22 C h a pte r 14 Completing the Audit
ILLUSTRATION 14.12
Management representation [1] Cloud 9 Inc.
letter for Cloud 9 audit
[2] March 15, 2023
[4] We are providing this letter in connection with your audit of the consolidated financial state-
ments of Cloud 9 Inc. as of January 31, 2023, and for the year then ended for the purpose of ex-
pressing an opinion as to whether the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all mate-
rial respects, the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of Cloud 9 in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. We confirm that
we are responsible for the fair presentation in the consolidated financial statements of financial
position, results of operations, and cash flows in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.
[5] Certain representations in this letter are described as being limited to matters that are material.
Items are considered material, regardless of size, if they involve an omission or misstatement of
accounting information that, in the light of surrounding circumstances, makes it probable that the
judgment of a reasonable person relying on the information would be changed or influenced by
the omission or misstatement.
[6] We confirm, to the best of our knowledge and belief, as of March 15, 2023, the following repre-
sentations made to you during your audit:
1. The financial statements referred to above are fairly presented in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Management Representation and Communication with Those Charged with Governance 14-23
[7] To the best of our knowledge and belief, no events have occurred subsequent to the
balance-sheet date and through the date of this letter that would require adjustment to or
disclosure in the aforementioned financial statements.
James W. Harley
[8] Chief Executive Officer
David Collier
[8] Chief Financial Officer
14-24 C h a pte r 14 Completing the Audit
appens at the beginning of the engagement (refer to the section “Corporate Governance” in
h
Chapter 4). Auditors also provide a general overview of the planned scope and timing of the
audit to those charged with governance. During this communication, auditors do not reveal in-
depth detail about the planned audit procedures because they do not want to compromise the
effectiveness of the audit. But this dialogue can open a discussion about risks the client faces
and can assist the auditor in gaining a better understanding of the entity and its environment.
Communication with those charged with governance, with management, and with third
parties, when applicable, is also covered in several other auditing standards. For example, if
auditors have identified a fraud, or have information that indicates the existence of a fraud,
they are required to communicate these matters to an appropriate level of management by
AU-C 240 Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit. Similarly, when auditors
have identified material noncompliance with laws and regulations, they are required to com-
municate their findings to those charged with governance in accordance with AU-C 250
Consideration of Laws and Regulations in an Audit of Financial Statements.
Toward the end of the audit, auditors communicate significant findings or issues from
the audit to those charged with governance. This communication should take place before the
audit report is issued. The communication may be oral or written, but either way it must be
documented in the working papers. Illustration 14.13 lists the matters to be communicated
with those charged with governance near the end of the audit.
For a public company audit, the items in Illustration 14.13 should be communicated with
the audit committee of the board of directors. In addition, the PCAOB’s AS 1301 includes
some unique terminology that is not included in AU-C 260. AS 1301 specifies that critical
critical accounting policies accounting policies and practices and critical accounting estimates must be commu-
and practices accounting nicated to the audit committee. An entity’s critical accounting policies and practices are most
policies and practices that are important for the portrayal of the company’s financial condition and results, and require man-
most important to the portrayal of agement’s most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments. For example, a large bank might
the company’s financial condition make a record number of new loans during the year, which could mean increased profits.
and results, and require manage-
However, management must also determine how many of those new loans may go unpaid in
ment’s most difficult, subjective,
the future. That could involve subjective and complex judgments. Critical accounting policies
or complex judgments
and practices are often unique to the industry or to the entity and are typically more subjective
critical accounting estimates
than common situations that affect most entities. Auditors must discuss their assessment of
accounting estimates whose na-
management’s application of and disclosure of the critical accounting policies and practices,
ture and impact on the financial
statements are material because including any recommended modifications that management did not make.
of the high levels of subjectiv- Critical accounting estimates are accounting estimates that possess the following two
ity and judgment necessary to characteristics:
account for highly uncertain
matters 1. The nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment nec-
essary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to
change.
2. The impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material.
For example, estimating the amount of a loss contingency from a material litigation sit-
uation, such as the Starbucks example in the Professional Environment box earlier in the
chapter, is a critical accounting estimate. The outcome of litigation may be highly uncertain,
and the circumstances may change over the course of a long court battle that spans several
years. In addition, the circumstances that led to the litigation are unique to the entity and
generally cannot be compared to situations of other companies. Auditors must communicate
how they concluded that the estimate is or is not reasonable.
Recall from Chapter 6 that material weaknesses and significant deficiencies in ICFR are
also required to be communicated to those charged with governance. The communication
must be in writing and is required for both public and private company clients. Refer to the
section “Management Letters” in Chapter 6 for an example of a management letter used to
communicate internal control deficiencies.
Before You Go On
5.1 What is the purpose of the management representation letter?
5.2 Name five items of governance interest that would be communicated to those charged with
governance. Explain why each is important to be communicated to those charged with
governance.
5.3 What characteristics of an estimate would classify it as a critical accounting estimate?
Provide an example of a critical accounting estimate for a computer manufacturing company.
Key Terms Review 14-27
Background Information deposit for the digital cable box. The audit team discovered
Your client, Broadcast Cable, Inc. (BC), is a large, privately owned multiple instances of duplicate refunds being processed to
company that offers digital television, internet, telephone, and customers.
home automation services. BC has been operating for 55 years. • Several factual misstatements were identified that were col-
Your audit team is busy wrapping up the audit in the final days of lectively immaterial. They were all corrected by management.
fieldwork and completing the review of the working papers. The • BC has some equipment that appears to be obsolete and
audit partner and audit manager are preparing to meet with BC’s no longer used in operations, but BC management has not
audit committee as required by AU-C 260, and they call a meeting recorded any impairment loss related to the equipment. Net
of the entire audit team to discuss what should be communicated property, plant, and equipment represents 31% of BC’s total
to the audit committee. The team agrees that the following items assets. Equipment such as trucks, cables, and wires are crit-
are key issues that emerged from the audit: ical items that BC uses to provide its services. The obsolete
• The digital home entertainment industry is experiencing equipment consists of wiring, cable, and conduits related to
rapid change, and customers’ choice of products for their residential phone services and legacy analog cable services.
homes is changing. The audit team recommended that management mark
down the obsolete items to fair market value and record a
• Controls testing revealed a significant deficiency in controls loss. The book value of the obsolete items is $1,059,500. The
over the processing of returns of customer deposits. items can be sold for scrap, so once they are marked down
• Several factual misstatements were identified that were col- to fair market value, BC would record an impairment loss of
lectively immaterial. $400,000. The materiality level for the financial statements
• BC has some equipment that appears to be obsolete and as a whole is $500,000. Management did not agree with the
no longer used in operations, but BC management has not assessment and has not made any adjustments for obsolete
recorded any impairment loss related to the equipment. equipment.
CPAexcel
CPAexcel questions and other resources are available in WileyPLUS.
Multiple-Choice Questions 14-29
Multiple-Choice Questions
1 (LO 1) If management considers a material loss contingency to c. the employee who is committing the fraud.
be probable but an amount cannot be reasonably estimated, the prop- d. an appropriate level of management or those charged with
er accounting treatment is: governance.
a. note disclosure only.
8. (LO 3) The audit firm must retain the audit file of a public
b. accrual in the financial statements only. c ompany client for:
c. accrual in the financial statements and note disclosure. a. 7 years.
d. no adjustment or disclosure necessary. b. 6 years.
2. (LO 2) Subsequent events occur after: c. 5 years.
a. the start of the fiscal year. d. 4 years.
b. the appointment of the auditor.
9. (LO 4) The going concern assumption means:
c. the end of the fiscal year.
a. the entity is facing difficulties continuing as a viable business
d. the going concern assumption. entity.
3. (LO 2) Which of the following is an example of a subsequent b. the entity is viewed as continuing in business for the foresee-
event? able future with no need for liquidation.
a. A
bond issuance after the balance sheet date but prior to issu- c. assets and liabilities are stated at liquidation values.
ance of the financial statements. d. the auditor is concerned whether the entity is going to change
b. A cybersecurity attack that occurred in the third quarter of locations.
the fiscal year.
10. (LO 4) For a private company client that follows GAAP, audi-
c. Legal action that was settled in the last month of the fiscal year. tors must consider the going concern assumption for a reasonable
d. A major customer declaring bankruptcy two months before period of time, which is:
the client’s year-end. a. o ne year from the date the financial statements are
4. (LO 2) Which of the following is a Type II subsequent event? issued.
a. B
ankruptcy of a customer subsequent to year-end, which b. one year from the completion of fieldwork.
would be considered when evaluating the adequacy of the c. one year from the date of the financial statements.
allowance for uncollectible accounts. d. one year from the completion of interim audit procedures.
b. Loss of plant as a result of fire or flood after year-end.
11. (LO 5) All of the following statements are included in a man-
c. Deterioration in financial results after year-end, which may agement representation letter except:
indicate doubt about the ability to continue as a going concern.
a. there have been no violations of laws or regulations.
d. An amount received related to an insurance claim that was in
the course of negotiation at year-end. b. no subsequent events have occurred that require adjustment
to or disclosure in the financial statements.
5. (LO 3) At the conclusion of the audit, the wrap-up process
c. the auditor’s fee for completing the audit.
involves all of the following except:
d. the effects of uncorrected misstatements are immaterial,
a. r eview of proper and complete execution of planned audit both individually and in the aggregate, to the financial
procedures. statements.
b. determination that all necessary matters have been appropri-
12. (LO 5) Communication with those charged with governance
ately considered.
must occur:
c. revisiting assessments for materiality, control risk, and risk
a. after the audit report is issued.
of fraud.
b. before the audit report is issued.
d. sending confirmations to financial institutions.
c. before legal letters are sent to attorneys.
6. (LO 3) All of the following are examples of qualitative character-
istics of a misstatement except: d. after the financial statements are released.
a. affects management’s compensation for the period. 13. (LO 5) Accounting policies and practices that are most import-
b. exceeds the amount for performance materiality. ant to the portrayal of the company’s financial condition and results,
and require management’s most difficult, subjective, or complex
c. changes a net loss to a net income for the period.
judgments are called:
d. affects compliance with debt covenants.
a. critical accounting policies and practices.
7. (LO 3) If auditors discover fraud during the audit, it should first b. critical accounting estimates.
be reported to:
c. significant accounting policies and practices.
a. the SEC.
d. material contingencies.
b. the PCAOB.
14-30 C h a pte r 14 Completing the Audit
Review Questions
R14.1 (LO 1) Describe the auditor’s process for preparing, sending, R14.8 (LO 3) What are the audit file assembly deadlines and the
and receiving responses from legal letters, including at what point audit file retention policies for public and private company audits?
during the audit the letters are sent. Provide an analysis of why you think the deadlines and policies are
different for public and private company audits.
R14.2 (LO 2) Differentiate between the two types of subsequent
events. List some audit procedures that may identify subsequent events. R14.9 (LO 4) Evaluate why the accounting assumption of “going
concern” is of interest to auditors. Are there specific audit procedures
R14.3 (LO 2) Discuss the auditor’s responsibility for detecting sub-
that must be performed related to the going concern assumption?
sequent events prior to the completion of fieldwork.
Why or why not?
R14.4 (LO 3) Explain the process of “engagement wrap-up.” Why
R14.10 (LO 5) Why is the management representation letter ob-
is it important?
tained at the end of the audit? Discuss the impact on the audit if man-
R14.5 (LO 3) Provide an example of why an auditor would reevaluate agement refused to sign the management representation letter.
control risk near the end of the audit. Provide a different example of
R14.11 (LO 5) AU-C 260 stresses the importance of communica-
why an auditor would reevaluate fraud risk near the end of the audit.
tion with “those charged with governance.” Who are “those charged
R14.6 (LO 3) Discuss actions an auditor would take when misstate- with governance?” Discuss why it is important that the auditor com-
ments identified during the audit are not corrected by the client. municate with them (and not others).
R14.7 (LO 3) Explain the process of an engagement quality control R14.12 (LO 5) Discuss the items an auditor communicates at the
review. end of the audit to those charged with governance.
Analysis Problems
AP14.1 (LO 1) Basic Communication with lawyers Conversations between the board of direc-
tors of Acme Inc. and the engagement partner of the audit, Angelo Del Santo, have revealed that Acme
uses three law firms. Ball & Partners performs all legal work related to property transfers, mortgages,
and leases. Brown & Associates handle all employment matters, such as claims for unfair dismissal and
complex employment contracts. Zimmerman & Co. are retained for all other matters, such as agreements
relating to products and suppliers and any international matters.
Required
a. Discuss the information that Angelo wants to obtain from the attorneys and how this information
is obtained.
b. What procedures could Angelo perform to discover if any other law firms have performed work for
Acme during the fiscal year?
AP14.2 (LO 2) Moderate Reporting subsequent events Brad Scarlett is reviewing the results of
the subsequent events audit procedures. Brad is writing a report for the audit partner based on these
results and will be attending a meeting tomorrow with the partner and representatives of the company to
discuss them. The issue will be whether the financial statements should be amended or additional notes
included for these subsequent events.
Many of the items are not material and Brad will recommend that no action be taken with respect
to these. However, there are several items that Brad believes are material and should be discussed at the
meeting. These are:
The year-end for the company is December 31 and the audit report is due to be signed on February 20.
Analysis Problems 14-31
Required
For each item, discuss what type of subsequent event it is and the appropriate treatment in the financial
statements.
AP14.3 (LO 2) Basic Events after balance date Martin Rorke is reviewing the results of the
review of subsequent cash receipts. There are several receipts listed from customers that were con-
sidered doubtful at the end of the year (December 31). Martin is also reviewing evidence showing
that another customer that had a large balance at year-end unexpectedly declared bankruptcy on
January 10.
Required
Analyze how this information should be reflected in the financial statements.
AP14.4 (LO 2) Moderate Reporting subsequent events On October 14, Montevista Inc. made
deposits with an overseas supplier totaling $500,000 for the production of specialty items. On October
27, the supplier closed due to political unrest in the country. Montevista hired an international trade
consultant to gain more information about the situation. The consultant concluded on January 11 that
it is unlikely that the deposit will be recovered. Montevista purchases over $3 million worth of items
from this supplier every year. Year-end for the Montevista audit is December 31, and the audit report is
due to be signed on February 26.
Required
a. Discuss what audit procedures would be used to gather evidence about this situation.
b. What is the appropriate treatment of this item in the December 31 financial statements?
AP14.5 (LO 3) Basic Audit wrap-up Lucy Huang has just finished her first audit assignment. She
is now assisting her audit manager, Tom Lucas, with the wrap-up of the engagement. He has asked Lucy
to make a list of all open review notes, to-do items, and audit procedures, and note for each whether the
matter requires more attention, has been resolved (but not yet noted on file), or is no longer relevant
because of other events.
Tom has also asked Lucy to go through the files and remove all unnecessary documentation, drafts,
and review notes. Lucy is very nervous about this task because she believes her inexperience will mean
she will not be able to distinguish “unnecessary” from “necessary.” She remembers learning about
Arthur Andersen being prosecuted because it shredded files related to the Enron audit that should
have been kept.
Required
a. What types of “additional attention” would open matters require?
b. Explain why documents in a client’s audit file would be “unnecessary.” Provide two examples.
AP14.6 (LO 4) Basic Going concern Mark Jackson is the partner on the audit team for a new client,
Central Companies (CC). The client hired Mark’s firm in August 2022, in preparation for the December 31,
2022, audit. Mark’s firm is replacing the predecessor firm that audited CC for the last 12 years. Since January
2022, CC has experienced a slowdown in sales as evidenced by lower inventory turnover ratios. Slower in-
ventory turnover has negatively impacted operating cash flow, which has resulted in CC paying some of its
suppliers late. Some of the smaller suppliers are demanding that CC pay cash on delivery of inventory items.
Mark is also aware of correspondence between CC and its bank that indicates the company started having
cash flow problems as far back as 2021. CC’s management is convinced that business will pick up and
therefore has not laid off any employees or made any other strategic changes to try and improve cash flow.
Required
Discuss any significant events or conditions that Mark will consider when evaluating if there is substan-
tial doubt about CC’s ability to continue as a going concern.
AP14.7 (LO 4) Moderate Research Assessing going concern Columbia Metal Fabricators
(CMF) makes steel components for the construction industry. It specializes in extreme precision manu-
facturing where tolerances are measured in distances of less than one millimeter. Its products are used in
revolving restaurants, automatic doors, and similar construction components. In the past, the majority of
its sales have been to international construction companies, particularly in the Middle East. A drop in the
price of oil has slowed construction in the Middle East, and the extremely expensive buildings requiring
high-precision steel components are becoming less popular. In addition, some of the technology used
14-32 C h a pte r 14 Completing the Audit
by CMF has been copied by companies in Southeast Asia, resulting in extreme price competition in this
section of the construction industry for the first time.
CMF is highly leveraged. Two years ago, the company borrowed a large sum of money to fund the
purchase of new office headquarters and the latest laser-cutting equipment. The loan is due for renewal
three months after year-end. One week before signing the audit report, the bank has still not agreed to
renew the loan and CMF’s management has begun negotiations with another bank.
Required
a. Evaluate factors that would raise substantial doubt about the going concern assumption for CMF.
Discuss any mitigating factors.
b. If there is a substantial going concern issue, what details should be disclosed in CMF’s notes to the
financial statements? (Note: You may want to access AU-C 570 for more details about auditing the
adequacy of the disclosure.)
AP14.8 (LO 5) Challenging Misstatements and the audit report Katrina Ellis is the engage-
ment partner of the audit of Champion Securities, an investment company. Most of Champion’s
assets and liabilities are financial and their valuation is critical to the assessment of the company’s
solvency and profitability. Katrina has employed two outside experts to value the financial assets and
liabilities because they are extremely complex to value, particularly the energy market derivatives
and the instruments traded in foreign markets. In addition, the valuations are highly dependent on
market conditions and the specific and detailed requirements of the recently revised accounting
standards.
Throughout this year’s audit, Katrina has had difficulties with the CEO of Champion Securities.
He is vehemently opposed to any asset write-downs she has suggested. The CEO has the backing of the
chairman of the board, and Katrina has been unable to get the CEO to agree with her concerns about the
valuations of the financial assets and liabilities the company has made. In past years, Katrina has had
an amicable relationship with both the CEO and the chairman, and the audits have run very smoothly.
Katrina now realizes that this harmonious relationship was mainly due to the boom in the market. It
was unlikely there would be arguments about writing up the value of the company’s assets during these
good times.
Katrina, with the help of the experts, has prepared a summary of the relevant items, detailing the
revised values for the assets and liabilities and the associated effects on income and retained earnings.
The CEO has dismissed this summary and the audit recommendations with the comment, “The market
has hit the bottom and is recovering. There is no need to show these write-downs because by the time the
financial statements are published, the values will be back to where they were before the market fell. It
is all a waste of time. In fact, I think you are just being difficult. I think we need an auditor who is a bit
more realistic.”
Required
a. Katrina has planned a meeting with the audit committee of the board of directors. Draft a report that
she would discuss with the audit committee.
b. Katrina is also drafting the management representation letter that the CEO will need to sign. If he
refuses to sign the letter, discuss the implications for the audit.
AP14.9 (LO 5) Basic Public Company Research Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
As discussed in the “Management Representation Letter” section of this chapter, Section 302 of SOX
requires the CEO and CFO of public companies to sign a certification statement when the financial
statements are filed with the SEC. You can access these documents through a public company’s website.
For example, in your web browser, search “Starbucks Investor Relations.” The website link will be the
first item in the search. Select SEC Filings. On the SEC Filings page you can search for all of Starbucks’
filings with the SEC. In the Year filter, select the most current year or you can leave it as All Years, and
in the Groupings Filter, select Annual Filings, then click Submit. The 10-K filings will appear. You can
download the 10-K in Word, PDF, or Excel format. Once downloaded, scroll to the end of the document.
(It is very long, usually about 200 pages.) The certification statements are the last pages of the Starbucks
10-K. (Note that you can use this same procedure to access the 10-K for any public company.)
Required
Read the certification statements and compare them to the management representation letter in
Illustration 14.12. Differentiate between the certification statement and the management representation
letter. Be specific with your responses.
Audit Decision Cases 14-33
King Companies, Inc. (KCI) is a private company that owns five auto parts stores in urban Los Angeles,
California. KCI has gone from two auto parts stores to five stores in the last three years, and it plans con-
tinued growth. Eric and Patricia King own the majority of the shares in KCI. Eric is the chairman of the
board of directors of KCI and CEO, and Patricia is a director as well as the CFO. Shares not owned by Eric
and Patricia are owned by friends and family who helped the Kings get started. Eric started the company
with one store after working in an auto parts store. To date, he has funded growth from an inheritance
and investments from a few friends. Eric and Patricia are thinking about expanding by opening three to
five additional stores in the next few years.
KCI employs 20 full-time staff. These workers are employed in store management, sales, parts deliv-
ery, and accounting. About 40% of KCI’s business is retail walk-in business, and the other 60% is regular
customers where KCI delivers parts to their locations and bills these customers on account. During peak
periods, KCI also uses part-time workers.
In mid-February 2023, while the December 31, 2022, audit was nearing the final wrap-up stage, KCI
was contacted by the manufacturer of its most popular line of brake pads and rotors. The manufacturer
notified KCI of a major defect recently discovered with its brake pads and rotors produced during August
2022 through November 2022. Several deadly car accidents have been attributed to the faulty brake parts,
and the manufacturer is moving as quickly as possible to recall the affected parts. The manufacturer
stated that KCI should pull the affected products off its shelves immediately and notify as many custom-
ers as possible who may have purchased the defective product. KCI management acts quickly and starts
looking through its sales records to see which customers purchased the affected parts. KCI also contacts
its attorney about the situation to begin discussions on how this might adversely affect KCI.
C14.1 (LO 1) Challenging Loss contingency Information gathering and analysis: Does KCI have
a potential loss contingency? Discuss procedures the auditors should perform to gather evidence about
this situation.
C14.2 (LO 2) Challenging Subsequent event Evaluation and conclusions: Evaluate whether the
recall qualifies as a subsequent event and its impact on the 2022 financial statements, if any.
Mobile Security, Inc. (MSI) has been an audit client of Leo & Lee, LLP for the past 12 years. MSI is a small,
publicly traded aviation company based in Cleveland, Ohio, where it manufactures high-tech unmanned
aerial vehicles (UAV), also known as drones, and other surveillance and security equipment. MSI’s prod-
ucts are primarily used by the military and scientific research institutions, but there is growing demand
for UAVs for commercial and recreational use. MSI must go through an extensive bidding process for
large government contracts. Because of the sensitive nature of government contracts and military prod-
uct designs, both the facilities and records of MSI must be highly secured.
The auditors are nearing the final wrap-up stages of the audit for the year ended June 30, 2023. The
following table shows final financial information for all four quarters of fiscal year end June 30, 2023
(amounts in millions).
In October 2022, MSI installed a new cloud-based inventory costing system. During interim work,
the audit team found some errors with the costing calculations in the new system, which led to errors
in recommended sales prices used in MSI’s competitive bidding process. There were also problems with
proper inventory cutoff at year-end. Some raw materials that were in transit were not recorded in inven-
tory when they should have been. The audit team has a meeting scheduled for the afternoon to discuss
the findings and next steps to wrap up the engagement.
14-34 C h a pte r 14 Completing the Audit
For the past five years, the engagement quality control reviewer was Sally Pickering, a partner with
Leo & Lee. Sally retired three months ago. For the past month, the firm has been considering who would
take Sally’s place as the engagement quality control reviewer for the MSI audit. The industry and opera-
tions of MSI are very specialized. Unfortunately, no other partner in the firm, other than the engagement
partner on the audit team, has experience in the industry or with MSI.
C14.3 (LO 3) Challenging Public Company Final evaluation of audit evidence
a. Analysis and evaluation: Evaluate the impacts the costing errors and inventory cutoff errors have
on the audit and the assessments of control risk, fraud risk, and materiality. Does your evaluation
change depending on whether the errors are material or immaterial?
b. Evaluation and conclusions: Refer to C3.4 in Chapter 3 in which you calculated planning materiality
for MSI based on results from the first two quarters and estimates for the last two quarters. Now
that you have the results of all four quarters (see table above), evaluate your calculation of planning
materiality from C3.4. Would you have adjusted your planning materiality during the year-end field-
work based on the actual results from the third and fourth quarters? If so, what would be the ad-
justed amount? What effect, if any, would your adjustment have on your planned audit procedures
for year-end fieldwork?
C14.4 (LO 3) Moderate Public Company Research Engagement quality control review
Information gathering: If Leo & Lee does not have an internal qualified individual to serve as engagement
quality control reviewer, what options does the firm have? Research AS 1220 to provide a full response
(www.pcaobus.org). What characteristics should the engagement quality control reviewer possess? De-
scribe the actual engagement quality control review process, such as when it is conducted and the primary
tasks of the reviewer.
Goodfellow & Perkins gained a new client, Brookwood Pines Hospital (BPH), a private, not-for-profit
hospital. The fiscal year-end for Brookwood Pines is June 30. You are the audit partner reviewing the
working papers for the BPH audit for the fiscal year end June 30, 2023. Today is August 2, 2023, and it is
expected that fieldwork will be completed in three weeks.
BPH provides medically necessary care to patients, regardless of their ability to pay. Both uninsured
and underinsured patients are offered discounts of up to 100% of charges based on their income as a
percentage of the federal poverty level guidelines. BPH does not pursue collection of these accounts;
therefore, they are not reported in patient service revenue and accounts receivable. The cost of providing
the charity care is included in operating expenses.
BPH’s investments consist of mutual funds, common equities, corporate and U.S. government debt
issues, state and municipal government debt issues, and trusts. A majority of the investments are the
result of charitable contributions to the hospital by generous donors. Earnings from the investments are
used to cover the costs of the charity care. BPH is also eligible for certain government grants to help cover
the costs of the charity care.
During your review, you note that during the third and fourth quarters the financial markets per-
formed well and BPH recorded strong returns for its equity investments. However, beginning toward the
end of the fourth quarter through today, the financial markets have taken a hit. Enacted future tax law
changes, increasing interest rates, higher unemployment, and trade conflicts with other countries are
negatively impacting the economy and the financial markets. Analysts are predicting a continued drop
in the overall market performance and a bear market for some time. Since BPH relies on investment re-
turns to cover the costs of charity care, you consider how smaller investment returns could impact BPH’s
ability to operate. Also, in times of economic downturns, individuals may not be as charitable. Therefore,
BPH could see a drop in donations.
Another situation that is on your mind is a kitchen fire that occurred at BPH last week. Thankfully
no one was seriously injured, but BPH did not have full insurance coverage for the accident. The kitchen
was badly damaged and had to be shut down along with the cafeteria seating area used for hospital visi-
tors. Until the kitchen can be repaired, BPH is paying an outside catering service to deliver meals daily to
patients and employees only. Visitors can no longer purchase items from the cafeteria. You are concerned
that negative publicity from the kitchen fire incident could lead to decreased revenues if physicians de-
cide to contract with a competing hospital.
You spoke with BPH’s controller yesterday about the fire incident. The controller said they do have
the funds to repair the kitchen and are currently accepting bids from contractors for the repair work.
They hope to have a contractor selected by next week so work can get started quickly. They are antici-
pating having the kitchen open in about six weeks. The controller did express concern over the added
expense of the repairs and the high cost of having an outside service provide daily meals to patients and
Audit Decision Cases 14-35
employees. He also said they have received concerned calls from many of the doctors who use BPH for
their patient services. BPH administration is working very hard at “damage control” to assure the doctors
that the hospital is safe and abiding by all codes required by the state department of health and hospitals.
C14.6 (LO 4, 5) Challenging Final review issues—going concern and communicating with
those charged with governance Evaluation: You are drafting a document with items to discuss with
BPH’s audit committee closer to the end of the audit. In addition to the kitchen fire incident, what else
should you communicate to the audit committee?