No. of Printed Pages : 4 2022 fafa — 1 (Toa G aftss) (qdta sete) Law - III (Revenue and Criminal) (Third Paper) ratte ere : aia 02] [yates : 200 Time allowed : Three Hours] [Maximum Marks : 200 az: areolar ew: (6) eal a eS Fareh es ‘aH' H T GEA | TM SHH IS a EA TT Oe F994 HOM 6 eM HT BIS THT BY | IH METH HH TA AA HTB | Note: — Candidates should answer six (6) questions in all, out of which they should answer question No. I and any other two questions from section ‘A’ and question No. 6 and any other two questions from section ‘B°. Marks carried by each question are indicated at its end. wus - H / Section—A 1 (&) aR, aa a fra & Eset ara fi wae % Pale & fates arta ar srretreareres eer | We Sat I SeRTEVS TSI He] aaa see aan aha | (ae Ser: ahem 200%) = 20 @ Sacre Sigg vag aft ah ee Ha SS Suan fee playa araral & fafa ‘after H feat ara & eta ge Ht aT eT aim | Baa | _ re tim: siftraaay 10071) 10 (a) &, Wien AM aH Aw, a THI un ats eis a ara eer fea Tar SAR See RI Hie Tae fers fear | spereht ae 1359 FT fate & sq woke ya ar fear Soaet 1/3 wefsig fear re | ae ge wate waren Prater aferand grr et fear a separ @ 2 sen a Tae H fal Sects Ht (arg atten: safer 1002162) 10 (a) Critically examine the legal provisions to determine the amount of rehabilitation grant in case of a wagf, trust or endowment. Support your answer with the suitable illustrations as applicable in Uttarakhand State. (Words limit: Maximum 200 Words) (b) Under the UP Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, the cognizance of the suits, notwithstanding anything contained in Civil Procedure ‘Code, shall not be ions. Elucidate. (Words limit : Maximum 100 Words) (c)_ A. a Zamindar died surviving him two sons X and Y. In the Khewat A’s name was removed and in his place X and Y were entered. Each son’s share was shown only 1/3. This entry of record of 1359 Fasli year. Whether this entry can be corrected by compensation settlement officer ? Support your answer by law. (Words limit: Maximum 100 Words) safien gm ee 1 Ame art oe se wee seed 7 eR Dy we oe a et a ee TY ores carer Fifa | (seq dir: saferaeae 100 10 (a) Brae fram ae 2 fe yoases Set aa eel, a ae fo Se eS ET qitada 7 ae ean aa, ved wes arg A your & ara Sh ba area & | Pater saat ated selene aise | (arg ee: stfeerery 100312) 10 RCJ 1 [P.T.0.RCI a Ube fa) (b) (©) (a) @ (@) (b) (©) (a) (@) @) @) (b) (c) (a) @ seit age aya fed 3 wre 8 safer eta 8, fe aft ae fet 9 Betta Poem | after wt | (area aim: arftranar 100 2122) Impact of U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act on the mines leased out by intermediary are not absolute, these are as in illustrative. Critically examine (Words limit: Maximum 100 Words) The general rule is that the rates of land revenue to continue until duly altered, but the procedure for determination of the land revenue is essential in every case. Examine with legal provisions. _ (Words limit: Maximum 100 Words) Rights retained by intermediaries on Zamindari abolition are limited, however, law has protected their interests. Comments. (Words limit: Maximum 100 Words) a st sige gen uf guy cafe % seta seer A actrees fare faa fh Gee sree oases | ‘A serraus Tae vie & Fiat sega et) (areg amt: saftrenaH 100 2162) ‘Bar afren aren yer wine & sale sass srfteen aren yer zh fadia a, fax ft ert at Siar at | (greg atm: srftreaa 100 ze¢) “sea wa” lyfe fate sawfa faftrs sadat afes anctarrers carer wil (meq an: saftrasae 100 2162) Critically discuss the grounds on which letting or sub-letting of land is allowed under Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act. In support, mention the decision of Uttarakhand Revenue Board. (Words limit: Maximum 100 Words) Bhumidhar with transferable rights is powerful, whereas, Bhumidhar with non-transferable rights has no power, whereas, both are Bhumidhar. Comments. (Words limit: Maximum 100 Words) Critically explain the “Improvement” with the help of legal provisions under the land law. (Words limit: Maximum 100 Words) frafefiad a fatter sea afea are ifr : @ aed art Gi) FIR aaa Ht fea (meg ter: aftrace 100 2162) ait’ wren & fem wera & yf ar aftfeafiad aren srazas 2, FAH STE WAR % eo wae aiken, sates, We Sie area ae Shrew sf we TT, aS | ga faved fates area a fae Gifsa | (area Sim: safer 100 T=) armor ors & siftrepr Hl Pater dias &, Pee i gece ear fale Hage 2 | wer a fatter at | (ase ein: aftr 100 2122) Explain the following with legal provisions : (i) Under Proprietor (ii) Instalment for nent ofrent (Words limit: Maximum 100 Words) For the tenants of *Sir’ it is necessary that, every tenant of land should be recorded, on the ground of this, some provisions of “Sir” are not applicable on women, minor, lunatic and a person in military etc. Describe the legal provisions on this matter. (Words limit: Maximum 100 Words) Right to get declaration have legal limitations, even its scope in law is very strong. Legally examine this statement. (Words limit: Maximum 100 Words) “ac fae, es a eat ee oe aH aha ed ober Neder aha Grech sue Lange) ae hg) one a ahr ss seer eh a Sftosnh Seat ee A Gt sie sumer a eat | gas Pre a Se aeaend a RNE reer Gara: Site 150 te) 2 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 15(a) (b) (@) @) (@) (a) (b) () (a) (a) (a) (b) (c) (a) (=) *Adhivasi’ is defined under land law, to take the possession by him is also clear; but dispute on this matter are serious. Comments over these disputes. (Words limit: Maximum 150 Words) To follow the procedure for the ejectment of land grabber of Scheduled Tribes under UPZA and LR Act are disputed. The courts has delivered welfare judgements in this regard. Comment. (Words limit: Maximum 150 Words) ‘Wve ~ 4/Section-B ‘grafts after’ & figs aft fader lfm | aera aera’ afk “ATT seer i en Eye at | (are ater: safer 200 Brea) ‘usr vita’ & soy aan gage & 2 anda aus Blea sepia ward aha fi aah A sat ei | (gag titer; saferara 100 wea) a at fen gral ea & fare share 2 |G a seared & yhors—eaey, ae BG HUH 8 | TSH A ITE fara 7 GG vs A eT seat HTT? ange | (xreq ihn: saferarae 100 3122) Discuss te principle of “Constructive lability. Distinguish between, common intention and common object. (Words limit: Maximum 200 Words) ‘What do you understand by solitary confinement ? Discuss the limit of solitary confinement under Indian Penal Code. (Words limit: Maximum 100 Woi ‘A’ instigates B to give false evidence. B in consequence of this instigation, commits that offence. What offence has been committed by “A”? What will be the difference of punishment between A and B ? Elucidate.(Words limit: Maximum 100 Words) eariatca fags % fara A aretrsarere fern ifs | SE ‘din: safer 100 22) at ap fafa HU BT a seTeTa Boe 2 fe fae ae fore Te ae fafiaa—a sa arm & feet ort cafes ger fever ar aT | wea “a belt reTT fore farrier & 2 atti aaa afea Bre Fe | res chor: ifr 160.7%) at ag aera ard ge fas ag ara oe Ht leh ett SH ay area ae, Te Sa 8 ae san ag SS he ST aie Hara | 3a ett a ate, es gon 7g ve eet, fg sea oe Ege re sae Bard &, arses HAS ‘a feos sree wr eh 2 7 aaa | (area eit: ftrena 100 2122) Critically discuss the doctrine of transferred malice. (Words limit: Maximum 100 Words) “X° signs his own name to a bill of exchange intending that it may be believed that the bill was drawn by another person of the same name Whether “X” is liable for any offence? Explain with legal provisions. (Words limit: Maximum 100 Words) *X° knowing, that he is likely to cause the death of a 7 month pregnant woman, does an act which, if it caused the death of the woman, would amount to culpable homicide. The woman is injured, but does not die: but the death of an unbom 7 month child with which she is pregnant is thereby caused. What offence “X” committed ? Explain in detail ‘Words limit: Maximum 100 Words) ¢ “teies Pea art , Rec oft ae Sie 8 1” aria arava 3 ge Pe ee re es Ah at ore oe ea ae faraatl (are din: afteTT 100 B82) ‘uate at afer F 1970 4 sraventia feen wen, Gr: 1391 4 sentra fear ra | ater Bt arent 3 Tat Ht fates afte fear # aftr 20 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 [P.1.0.9. 10. RCI (a) @ (b) © (a) @) (@) (@) (b) (©) @) ® (@) (b) ‘a wp ara (7) ae A eh oe a A a’ | TH 19 a a eT a ed ser aricr AC an ge aA A foe See Sa she ae en aT | aa a feet sara & fora & 7 wwe | (weg SMT: GHfteaT 100 ez) “MeNaughton rule is very old, still itis alive.” Indian courts, recognize the relevancy of this rule for the application of it, as prescribed in Indian Penal Code. Discuss. (Words limit: Maximum 100 Words) Sedition was added to the Code in 1870, again amended in 1891. Recently court has also expressed its views on the legality and constitutionality of sedition. Keeping in view of the above, express your arguments in for and against of the sedition. (Words limit: Maximum 100 Words) *X’, a girl child of 7 years is sleeping in her house. *Y’, a boy of 19 years enters her house and removes her trouser and left the place. Whether “Y° is liable for any offence ? Explain. (Words limit: Maximum 100 Words) ore anf a ein eh esa aK area silty wer & fore wast area A pioment (erat (sata eer she wares) STAT qs oft SR dan HHTE HAL aT Ah fees Hiv | __ (eg ATT: saftey 100 aun See paetga raat ae Ra ae isa aE war ar a Fang saae fan 7 arr ated FE BT | te og) Sta tes GRAIN WTO OULD Sent we arrafta fen at en, fy cafe a franc rarer 3 Se Rear it are et a wes afer 61 aT 302/34 % seria eet ara EU ssid arTaTA Ht AST we (ga arafata ar fairs afte hifse | (Guan safer 100 3162) Attempt is the third stage of offence for committing voluntary grievous hurt by using the acid etc. Punishment for both (commission and attempt) the offences dre different. In the light of this offence, elucidate the intention and knowledge. (Words limit: Maximum 100 Words) ‘A, who is a black smith, out of fear joins the gang of dacoits. On their order, he breaks open the lock of a house and decoits enter in that house and plunder it. Whether A has committed any offence ? Explain with reasons. (Words limit: Maximum 100 Words) persons were charged under Section 302/149 of Indian Penal Code, three persons were acquitted by the trial court and remaining three convicted under ection 302/34 of the indian Penal Code and awarded lif imprisonment. Legally ‘examine the validity of this conviction. (Words limit: Maximum 100 Words) araaftes africa 4 waa fire dn ae wm sara 2? unedia ave ate gaa sue afea wer wl ETE aE | (xreq efi sree 58 a) aa ma Fane} Sada =A A wari aa ana aa, HATA) 184 3% 2014, ATTET, Tivatier um a atin fea, cise a He HR fa mre & sea rere a aoe we TC | adler =e | (xreg efter: srftrencr 150 2164) To ee extent intoxication is a defence in criminal prosecution ? Explain this statement with relevant provisions of Indian Penal Code. (Words limit: Maximum 150 Words) Recently Supreme Court of India upheld the Constitutional validity of defamation in Subramaniam Swami V Union of India, Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 184 of 2014 but still there is a debate that criminalization under defemation should be abolished. Critically examine. (Words limit: Maximum 150 Words) 10 10 10 10 15 15