Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The term WARP summarizes methods to ■ Changes in tissue contrast: Failure of High bandwidth
minimize the impact of metal implants fat suppression and saturation bands. sequence parameters
on image quality. ■ In-plane distortion: The local field off-
set leads to a shift of image pixels in Basic acquisition parameters are adjusted
Challenges the readout encoding (i.e. frequency to what is called high bandwidth (BW)
Metals have highly different susceptibil- encoding) direction. parameters to make the MR sequence
ity constants compared to tissue. When ■ Through-plane distortion: The local less sensitive to field distortions.
metallic implants are present in the MRI field offset leads to curved and frayed What is done:
examination, the static magnetic field in slices instead of the expected flat The bandwidth of both the excitation
their vicinity is manipulated by strong image plane (Fig. 1). pulse and the signal readout is
local off-resonances induced by the Since both in-plane and through-plane increased.
implants. The degree of field distortions distortions shift image pixels away from What it effects:
depends on the shape, the location their real positions, image geometry A high bandwidth sequences reduces
and the material properties of the metal appears to be distorted. In both cases, the through-plane distortion of the slice
implant. regions with severe field changes will profile. This implies less severe varia-
lead to signal voids visible as black spots tions of the apparent slice thickness, i.e.
Distortions of the static and signal pileups visible as bright spots. the amount of signal voids and pileups is
magnetic field result in: However, it makes sense to distinguish reduced compared to standard protocols
■ Intra-voxel dephasing: Signal voids are between in- and through-plane artifacts, with a low bandwidth.
visible as black areas in the image. since different techniques are needed to A high signal readout bandwidth
reduce these types of artifacts.
1A 1B 1C Approaches to avoid
metal artifacts Implant imaging at 3T:
Imaging in the presence of metal There is a significant difference
implants is mostly based on (turbo) spin between MR imaging at 3T and
echo sequences due to its high immu- 1.5T. In contrast to common
nity with regard to signal dephasing clinical imaging, higher field
induced by local off-resonances. strength does not necessarily imply
In the following, three approaches to better image quality for patients
reduce metal artifacts are presented, with metal implants. Apart from
that have shown promising results in increased safety concerns, the
clinical settings. Figure 2 depicts their level of image distortions scales
effects in-vivo compared to imaging with the strength of the static
1 The upper row visualizes the ideal case of slice
selection, while the lower row displays the effects with standard protocols. Although other field, i.e. the level of artifacts is
on the slice selection by a distorted background techniques exist, they are often con- higher at 3T than at 1.5T. Addition-
field: (1A) B0 field map in slice select direction, strained by excessive scan times or ally, the efficiency of artifact
(1B) B0 field map in direction of slice encoding special hardware requirements. reduction techniques is reduced by
with superimposed magnetic gradient field for
excitation, and (1C) position of the excited slice.
the increased SAR constrains at 3T.
Product News
limited by the patient (SAR). Hence, the The additional gradient causes shearing **WIP: Work in progress. SEMAC is currently under
development; is not for sale in the U.S.
RF pulse bandwidth is more affected by of the imaged pixels, as if the slice were Its future availability cannot be guaranteed.
these restrictions and in-plane artifact viewed at an angle. From a different
reduction is more efficient. point-of-view, the VAT gradient brings Disclaimer:
back all excited spins within the RF MR imaging of patients with metallic implants brings
3A 3B specific risks. However, certain implants are approved
bandwidth and local off-resonances are by the governing regulatory bodies to be MR condition-
cancelled exactly. Hence, the pixel shift in ally safe. For such implants, the previously mentioned
readout direction is fully compensated. warning may not be applicable. Please contact the
implant manufacturer for the specific conditional infor-
What it effects: mation. The conditions for MR safety are the responsi-
In-plane distortions, more precisely bility of the implant manufacturer, not of Siemens.
those along the readout direction, are
corrected. However, VAT may cause blur-
ring of the image caused by two sepa- Contact
Mathias Nittka, Ph.D.
rate effects. One cause is the geometric
3 VAT* blurring caused by the shearing Siemens Healthcare
of the slice: (3A) Image without VAT: the slice shear, causing edges to be smeared MR PI ORTH
signal of a vertical structure (vertical blue out along the shearing direction (Fig. 3). Postbox 32 60
line) is well localized in a pixel (horizontal This effect can be reduced by using thin 91050 Erlangen
blue line); (3B) blurred image with VAT: Germany
slices and a high resolution. The second
The vertical structure appears smeared Phone: +49 (9131) 84-4460
source of blurring is a low-pass filter mathias.nittka@siemens.com
over multiple pixels.