You are on page 1of 2

Product News

syngo WARP – Metal Artifact Reduction


Techniques in Magnetic Resonance
Imaging
Theresa Bachschmidt; Ferdinand Lipps, Ph.D.; Mathias Nittka, Ph.D.

Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany

The term WARP summarizes methods to ■ Changes in tissue contrast: Failure of High bandwidth
minimize the impact of metal implants fat suppression and saturation bands. sequence parameters
on image quality. ■ In-plane distortion: The local field off-
set leads to a shift of image pixels in Basic acquisition parameters are adjusted
Challenges the readout encoding (i.e. frequency to what is called high bandwidth (BW)
Metals have highly different susceptibil- encoding) direction. parameters to make the MR sequence
ity constants compared to tissue. When ■ Through-plane distortion: The local less sensitive to field distortions.
metallic implants are present in the MRI field offset leads to curved and frayed What is done:
examination, the static magnetic field in slices instead of the expected flat The bandwidth of both the excitation
their vicinity is manipulated by strong image plane (Fig. 1). pulse and the signal readout is
local off-resonances induced by the Since both in-plane and through-plane increased.
implants. The degree of field distortions distortions shift image pixels away from What it effects:
depends on the shape, the location their real positions, image geometry A high bandwidth sequences reduces
and the material properties of the metal appears to be distorted. In both cases, the through-plane distortion of the slice
implant. regions with severe field changes will profile. This implies less severe varia-
lead to signal voids visible as black spots tions of the apparent slice thickness, i.e.
Distortions of the static and signal pileups visible as bright spots. the amount of signal voids and pileups is
magnetic field result in: However, it makes sense to distinguish reduced compared to standard protocols
■ Intra-voxel dephasing: Signal voids are between in- and through-plane artifacts, with a low bandwidth.
visible as black areas in the image. since different techniques are needed to A high signal readout bandwidth
reduce these types of artifacts.

1A 1B 1C Approaches to avoid
metal artifacts Implant imaging at 3T:
Imaging in the presence of metal There is a significant difference
implants is mostly based on (turbo) spin between MR imaging at 3T and
echo sequences due to its high immu- 1.5T. In contrast to common
nity with regard to signal dephasing clinical imaging, higher field
induced by local off-resonances. strength does not necessarily imply
In the following, three approaches to better image quality for patients
reduce metal artifacts are presented, with metal implants. Apart from
that have shown promising results in increased safety concerns, the
clinical settings. Figure 2 depicts their level of image distortions scales
effects in-vivo compared to imaging with the strength of the static
1 The upper row visualizes the ideal case of slice
selection, while the lower row displays the effects with standard protocols. Although other field, i.e. the level of artifacts is
on the slice selection by a distorted background techniques exist, they are often con- higher at 3T than at 1.5T. Addition-
field: (1A) B0 field map in slice select direction, strained by excessive scan times or ally, the efficiency of artifact
(1B) B0 field map in direction of slice encoding special hardware requirements. reduction techniques is reduced by
with superimposed magnetic gradient field for
excitation, and (1C) position of the excited slice.
the increased SAR constrains at 3T.

24 MAGNETOM Flash · 2/2012 · www.siemens.com/magnetom-world


2A 2B

Product News

superimposed on the signal readout by


the additional VAT gradient. This can be
reduced by a short readout duration.

SEMAC** (Slice Encoding for


2C 2D
Metal Artifact Correction)
SEMAC is based on a 2D TSE sequence.
An additional encoding dimension is
introduced to enable the correction of
through-plane distortions.
What is done:
Each slice is additionally phase-encoded
in the third dimension, very similar to a
3D scan. This provides information on
how the slice profile is distorted, such
that signal shifted perpendicular to the
2 Image comparison: (2A) standard protocol, (2B) high BW, (2C) VAT* and (2D) SEMAC**. image plane can be corrected by post-
processing during image reconstruction.
What it effects:
Gross through-plane artifacts, which
addresses in-plane distortions: Intra- VAT* (View Angle Tilting) usually cannot be handled efficiently
voxel signal dephasing and geometrical by high bandwidth parameters, can be
shift in the readout encoding direction VAT is a modified sequence acquisition corrected. In particular, imaging of large
are reduced. Consequently, the image scheme that is able to compensate for metal structures like full knee or hip
has less signal voids and less pileup arti- in-plane distortions. It can be easily replacements is being studied. This
facts related to in-plane distortions. implemented into a turbo spin echo method is very time-consuming. Despite
The main drawback of high bandwidth (TSE) sequence. the use of advanced undersampling
protocols is reduced signal-to-noise ratio What is done: techniques, such as partial Fourier and
(SNR) and increased specific absorption Simultaneously with the conventional parallel imaging, it is challenging to
rate (SAR). High bandwidth sequences readout gradient, an additional readout achieve scan times acceptable for rou-
are very demanding in terms of scanner gradient is applied along the slice selective tine examinations.
hardware, mainly gradient and RF power direction. Its amplitude equals the one
performance. Ultimately, the RF power applied during the excitation RF pulse. *510(k) pending. Not for sale in the U.S. and in other
applied by high bandwidth RF pulses is What it means: countries.

limited by the patient (SAR). Hence, the The additional gradient causes shearing **WIP: Work in progress. SEMAC is currently under
development; is not for sale in the U.S.
RF pulse bandwidth is more affected by of the imaged pixels, as if the slice were Its future availability cannot be guaranteed.
these restrictions and in-plane artifact viewed at an angle. From a different
reduction is more efficient. point-of-view, the VAT gradient brings Disclaimer:
back all excited spins within the RF MR imaging of patients with metallic implants brings
3A 3B specific risks. However, certain implants are approved
bandwidth and local off-resonances are by the governing regulatory bodies to be MR condition-
cancelled exactly. Hence, the pixel shift in ally safe. For such implants, the previously mentioned
readout direction is fully compensated. warning may not be applicable. Please contact the
implant manufacturer for the specific conditional infor-
What it effects: mation. The conditions for MR safety are the responsi-
In-plane distortions, more precisely bility of the implant manufacturer, not of Siemens.
those along the readout direction, are
corrected. However, VAT may cause blur-
ring of the image caused by two sepa- Contact
Mathias Nittka, Ph.D.
rate effects. One cause is the geometric
3 VAT* blurring caused by the shearing Siemens Healthcare
of the slice: (3A) Image without VAT: the slice shear, causing edges to be smeared MR PI ORTH
signal of a vertical structure (vertical blue out along the shearing direction (Fig. 3). Postbox 32 60
line) is well localized in a pixel (horizontal This effect can be reduced by using thin 91050 Erlangen
blue line); (3B) blurred image with VAT: Germany
slices and a high resolution. The second
The vertical structure appears smeared Phone: +49 (9131) 84-4460
source of blurring is a low-pass filter mathias.nittka@siemens.com
over multiple pixels.

MAGNETOM Flash · 2/2012 · www.siemens.com/magnetom-world 25

You might also like