Assessment Report 2018
LAW ENFORCEMENT ACCREDITATION
Direccion de Seguridad Publica y Transito del Municipio de Metepec
Agency
Direccion de Seguridad Publica y
Transito del Municipio de Metepec
Av. Tecnológico S/N San Salvador
Tizatlalli
Metepec, EM 52172
Chief Executive Officer
Comisario
Jesús Alberto Ramírez Manzur
November 08, 2018
Methodology Overview
CALEA serves as the premier credentialing association for public
safety agencies and provides accreditation services for law
enforcement organizations, public safety communication centers,
public safety training academies, and campus security agencies. The
standards are promulgated by a board of 21 commissioners,
representing a full spectrum of public safety leadership. The
assessment process includes extensive self-assessment, annual
remote web-based assessments, and quadrennial site-based
assessments. Additionally candidate agencies are presented to the
Commission for final consideration and credentialing.
CALEA Accreditation is a voluntary process and participating
public safety agencies, by involvement, have demonstrated a
commitment to professionalism. The program is intended to enhance
organization service capacities and effectiveness, serve as a tool for
policy decisions and management, promote transparency and
community trust, and establish a platform for continuous review.
CALEA Accreditation is the Gold Standard for Public Safety
Agencies and represents a commitment to excellence.
1
 TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary

Chief Executive Officer Profile

Community Profile

Agency History

Law Enforcement Accreditation Agency Structure and Function

CALEA standards reflect the current Agency Successes
thinking and experience of Law
Enforcement practitioners and Future Issues for Agency
researchers. Major Law Enforcement
Initial Remote Web-Based Assessment
associations, leading educational and
training institutions, governmental Site-Based Assessment Review
agencies, as well as Law
Enforcement executives Community Feedback and Review
internationally, acknowledge Standards Related Data Tables
CALEA’s Standards for Law
Enforcement Agencies© and its
Accreditation Programs as
benchmarks for professional law
enforcement agencies.
CALEA's Founding Organizations:

International Association of
Chiefs of Police (IACP)

Police Executive
ResearchForum (PERF)

National Sheriffs Association

(NSA)

National Organization of
Black Law Enforcement
Executives (NOBLE)

2
Assessment Report 2018 November 08, 2018

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Overview:
The Direccion de Seguridad Publica y Transito del Municipio de Metepec Agency is currently commanded by Jesús
Alberto Ramírez Manzur. The agency participated in a remote assessment(s), as well as site-based assessment activities
as components of the accreditation process. The executive summary serves as a synopsis of key findings, with greater
details found in the body of the report.

Compliance Service Review:

CALEA Compliance Services Member(s) Alex Roffe and Alex Cueto remotely reviewed 188 standards for the agency
on 5/23/2018 using Law Enforcement Manual 5.23. These standards included specific time-sensitive issues, as well as
all standards applicable to the agency by size and function. If standard issues are found they are listed below.

Site-Based Assessment Review:

From 8/28/2018 to 8/30/2018, James Carmody and Xavier Benevides visited the agency following a consultation with
the chief executive officer regarding critical issues impacting the organization since the last assessment. These issues
were identified as:
Recruitment - The agency has done a great job of recruiting throughout the region. Like many other Mexican
police agencies, providing extended assistance to candidates to make them more marketable has been extremely
beneficial. Working with candidates on process preparation has been helpful, along with posting all of the criteria
required to successfully navigate the process. And on the question of recruiting females, the agency recognizes
that cultural issues are the biggest barrier to increasing the number of female candidates for police work, but the
agency was clear and unequivocal about its determination to increase those numbers. It should be noted that the
agency's female staffing was in excess of 14%, which, according to U.S. studies, exceeds a good portion of the
female sworn officers employed by police agencies in the U.S.

DETAINEES - Whether a crime is a felony or misdemeanor decides which direction the detainee is funneled to
for final adjudication. Misdemeanor crimes are addressed by the MPD, who then processes the detainee and
either temporarily lodges the detainee, or releases to appear. In the event that the detainee has committed a
felony, the MPD immediately turns the detainee over to the Ministerial (State) police for adjudication.
The agency supports a holding facility for detainees that provides for all of the detainee's needs, and also provides
proper sight/sound separation for male, female and juvenile detainees.

FUTURE ISSUES - Changing the perspectives of the community remains the biggest change for the CEO and his
staff. The Director has done an exceptional job of laying the first few blocks in the foundation, but it will a long
and challenging journey. The first efforts are clearly discernible when looking at the recruiting efforts and the
agency messaging directed at the new officers. The focus on "service" is repeatedly woven int the agency
directives and training. Followed closely by personal accountability. Steps have already been taken to remove
those officers from the street who might pose the biggest liabilities, which sends a clear message to the others.
The director knows that there are many more challenges ahead, but he firmly believes that being accredited is that
very important first step in effecting change.
TRAINING - As the Director stated during an interview, training is the key ingredient to changing the
perspectives that community members have of policing in the City of Metepec. The better trained the officers
are, the better level of service. The better level of service sets the base-line of how competent the agency is
perceived, which engenders a greater sense of confidence the residents will have for the agency. The MPD has
applied training that focuses on treating the public with greater compassion and respect has already proven to be
beneficial when it comes to public confidence. That was made clear during the public forum.

CRIME PREVENTION - The agency's technical prevention methods were exceptional and offered a much
3
 different perspective on public surveillance efforts aimed at prevention and protection. With more than 400
CCTV camera's placed around the City of Metepec that are monitored 24/7, the community enjoys the benefits of
crime prevention and protection not known to hundreds of other communities both in Mexico and the U.S. By
Mexican law, the MPD is considered a police organization whose mandate is prevention. To expand on the video
surveillance, the agency developed a mobile telephone app that allows the owner to report a crime as it occurs
through the use of the app in conjunction with the 911-communication system, subsequently leveraging the power
and convenience of social media and making it a strong ally in the fight against crime.
During the Site-Based Assessment Review, the assessment team conducted 8 interviews regarding the topical areas
previously defined. The interviews were with agency members and members of the community. The approach not only
further confirmed standards adherence, but also considered effectiveness measures, process management and intended
outcomes.

4
Assessment Report 2018 November 08, 2018

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PROFILE

Jesús Alberto Ramírez Manzur
Commissioner Jesús Alberto Ramírez Manzur graduated from the Police Training Center of the Federal Police, from
the Ministry of Public Security, from the NFP's Sub-Officers Course since October 2006.

He has participated in various courses such as:

-Forensic Practice in the matter of Federal Motor Carrier (National Security Commission)
-Municipal Preventive Police (Ministry of the Interior)
-Certificate of Labor Competence of Application of police practices for the regulation of motor transport and accident
prevention (Ministry of Public Education and Federal Police)
-First Line Supervisor Course (United StatesEmbassy and Executive Secretariat of the National Public Security System)
-Municipal Preventive Police Commander Course (National Public Security System and Government of Puebla).

Commissioner Manzur has12 years of experience as a Federal Police, and 3 years as Director of Public Security and
Transit of Metepec.

5
Assessment Report 2018 November 08, 2018

COMMUNITY PROFILE
The percentage of the population living in poverty according to the CONEVAL is 26.3%, that is, 67,892 inhabitants of
Metepec have at least one social deficiency in any of the indicators mentioned above and their income is insufficient to
acquire the goods and services required for basic needs. Provide a minimum of and reach a page size that describes the
geographic area, the largest source of employment, the critical infrastructure and the level of education, the largest
source of employment for your community. ..

The municipality of Metepec, State of Mexico, is 43.76 square miles and is adjacent to the municipalities of: San Mateo
Atenco, Lerma, Santiago Tianguistenco, Toluca, Calimaya, Mexicaltzingo and Chapultepec. To the south: the
municipalities of Calimaya, Mexicaltzingo, Chapultepec (municipality) and Toluca. To the east: the municipalities of
San Mateo Atenco, Lerma, and Santiago Tianguistenco.

According to the regionalization of the Government of the State of Mexico, the municipality of Metepec is located in
region VI, whose economic activities vary according to the productive development and the socioeconomic potential of
the municipalities that make up the region. Due to the relative closeness of the poles and a limited number of PMIs this
information applies to the five proposed locations.

Metepec excels in the commercial and services sector, which is particularly important since it concentrates more than
half of the economically active population.

On the other hand, agriculture and industry are unevenly distributed, even in the region, agriculture does not have a
significant representation.

In the municipality there are a total of 2,750 economic units that represent 1.21% of the total economic units located in
the State of Mexico, which employ 10,488 people, who are located mainly in the area of ​trade and services, being the
largest number of establishments (5.28 in services, 2.78 in commerce and 5.04 in manufacturing).

6
Assessment Report 2018 November 08, 2018

AGENCY HISTORY

7
Assessment Report 2018 November 08, 2018

AGENCY STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION

The Public Safety and Traffic Department of Metepec is under the charge of Director Jesus Alberto Ramirez Manzur as
of September 16, 2015. He is a graduate of the Federal Police Academy with extensive experience in the field.
Commander Marco Antonio López García is the current Coordinator of Police Operations. He is also a graduate of the
Federal Police Academy. He is considered second in command.
In this unit, there are 343 sworn officers and 56 non-sworn officers.

8
Assessment Report 2018 November 08, 2018

AGENCY SUCCESSES
Within the Directorate of Public Safety and Traffic of Metepec, the first accreditation period is carried out, with the
following mission and vision:

MISSION
Preserve and maintain public order and social peace to protect the physical integrity, rights and property of
metepequenses, through the formulation and implementation of programs and coordinated actions between the three
levels of government and citizens, to combat crime and prevent the commission of crimes.

VISION
Be an organization that stands out for continually strengthening trust and citizen participation through the
implementation of policies that provide the guarantee of human rights, the physical integrity of people and their
heritage, through a professional, efficient and responsible police in their working methods and police intelligence
systems.
According to this, the following successes are established when achieving the accreditation of CALEA:
The improvement in the implementation and application of police functions.
Better functionality in the police field; at the time of carrying out the implementation of the standards, as long as
human rights are respected.
Reasoning at the moment of applying the use of force, as well as the analysis of the critical situations in which it is
carried out.
Respect Public Security policies.
Comply in an appropriate manner with the current policies, and administrative & disciplinary provisions that are above
what is established in each one of the CALEA standards.
That is why this agency considers it of the utmost importance to satisfactorily carry out compliance with the standards
and thus achieve the accreditation of this certification for agencies in charge of complying with the law.

9
Assessment Report 2018 November 08, 2018

FUTURE ISSUES FOR AGENCY

Within the Directorate of Public Security and Traffic of Metepec, there are no problems so far that, according to their
seriousness, may affect the provision of the services that the same provides to the people of Metepec, however, in
some period of time marked by CALEA, which consists of approximately 3 - 5 years, is not exempt from the presence
of high-risk situations that may prevent or affect the provision of services to a certain degree, these being:

1. Natural Disasters, where you do not have what it takes to solve the critical situation that arises.
2. Man-made disasters that can get out of control.
3. Any attempt against the organization's facilities.

10
Assessment Report 2018 November 08, 2018

INITIAL REMOTE WEB-BASED ASSESSMENT

Compliance Services Member: Alex Roffe and Alex Cueto
On 5/23/2018, the Inital Remote Web-based Assessment of Direccion de Seguridad Publica y Transito del Municipio
de Metepec was conducted. The review was conducted remotely and included 188 standards from the CALEA®
Standards for Law Enforcement Manual. The following standards were reviewed and the findings are denoted:

Standards Findings
1 Law Enforcement Role and Authority
1.1.1 Oath of Office (LE1) Compliance Verified
1.1.2 Code of Ethics* (LE1) Compliance Verified
1.2.1 Legal Authority Defined (LE1) Compliance Verified
1.2.3 Compliance with Constitutional Requirements (LE1) Compliance Verified
1.2.4 Search and Seizure (LE1) Compliance Verified
1.2.5 Arrest with/without Warrant (LE1) Compliance Verified
1.2.8 Strip/Body Cavity Search (LE1) Compliance Verified
1.2.9 Bias Based Profiling* (LE1) Compliance Verified
1.3.1 Use of Reasonable Force (LE1) Compliance Verified
1.3.2 Use of Deadly Force (LE1) Compliance Verified
1.3.3 Warning Shots (LE1) Compliance Verified
1.3.4 Use of Authorized Less Lethal Weapons (LE1) Compliance Verified
1.3.5 Rendering Aid After Use of Weapons (LE1) Compliance Verified
1.3.6 Reporting Uses of Force* (LE1) Compliance Verified
1.3.7 Reviewing Reports of 1.3.6* (LE1) Compliance Verified
1.3.8 Removal from Line of Duty Assignment Use of Force (LE1) Compliance Verified
1.3.9 Authorization: Weapons and Ammunition (LE1) Compliance Verified
Notes: CSM Notes: ISSUE: Bullet "b" The written directive does not specify ammunition approved by the agency.
AGENCY ACTION NEEDED: The agency needs to include ammunition approved by the agency in their written
directive. ASSESSOR NOTES: The agency included the necessary information indicating what ammunition is
approved, in the agency directive.

1.3.10 Demonstrating Proficiency with Weapons (LE1) Compliance Verified

1.3.11 Annual/Biennial Proficiency Training* (LE1) Compliance Verified
1.3.12 Issuing Written Directives (LE1) Compliance Verified
1.3.13 Analyze Reports from 1.3.6* (LE1) Compliance Verified

11
Standards Findings
3 Contractual Agreements for Law Enforcement Services
3.1.1 Written Agreement for Services Provided (LE1) Compliance Verified
11 Organization and Administration
11.1.1 Description of Organization (LE1) Compliance Verified
11.3.1 Responsibility/Authority (LE1) Compliance Verified
11.4.5 Notify CEO of Incident with Liability (LE1) Compliance Verified
12 Direction
12.1.2 Command Protocol (LE1) Compliance Verified
12.1.3 Obey Lawful Orders (LE1) Compliance Verified
12.2.1 The Written Directive System (LE1) Compliance Verified
12.2.2 Dissemination and Storage (LE1) Compliance Verified
15 Planning and Research Goals and Objectives and Crime Analysis
15.2.1 Annual Updating/Goals and Objectives* (LE1) Compliance Verified
Notes: CSM Notes: ISSUE: The written directive does not specify "annual" updating of goals & objectives.
AGENCY ACTION NEEDED: The written directive needs to specify "annual" updating of goals & objectives.
ASSESSOR NOTES: The agency included the annual updating language into the agency directive.
16 Allocation and Distribution of Personnel and Personnel Alternatives
16.3.1 Program Description (LE1) Not Applicable by Function
16.3.2 Selection Criteria (LE1) Not Applicable by Function
16.3.3 Entry Level Training (LE1) Not Applicable by Function
16.3.5 In-Service Training (LE1) Not Applicable by Function
16.3.6 Use of Force Training & Firearms Proficiency (LE1) Not Applicable by Function

16.4.2 Training (LE1) Not Applicable by Function

17 Fiscal Management and Agency Property
17.4.2 Cash Fund/Accounts Maintenance* (LE1) Compliance Verified
17.5.3 Operational Readiness (LE1) Compliance Verified
21 Classification and Delineation of Duties and Responsibilities
21.2.2 Job Description Maintenance and Availability (LE1) Compliance Verified
22 Compensation Benefits and Conditions of Work
22.2.2 Benefits Program (LE1) Compliance Verified
22.2.4 Victim Witness Services/Line of Duty Death (LE1) Compliance Verified
22.2.7 Employee Identification (LE1) Compliance Verified
22.2.8 Military Deployment and Reintegration (LE1) Compliance Verified
12
Standards Findings
22.3.2 General Health and Physical Fitness (LE1) Compliance Verified
22.3.5 Extra-Duty Employment (LE1) Compliance Verified
25 Grievance Procedures
25.1.1 Grievance Procedures (LE1) Compliance Verified
26 Disciplinary Procedures
26.1.1 Code of Conduct and Appearance (LE1) Compliance Verified
26.1.3 Sexual Harassment (LE1) Compliance Verified
26.1.4 Disciplinary System (LE1) Compliance Verified
Notes: CSM Notes: ISSUE: The procedures and criteria for using training as a function of discipline is not clearly
defined in the written directive. AGENCY ACTION NEEDED: The procedures and criteria for using training as a
function of discipline need to be clearly defined in the written directive. ASSESSOR NOTES: Written directive was
modified to include the using training as a form of discipline.
26.1.6 Appeal Procedures (LE1) Compliance Verified
31 Recruitment
31.2.1 Recruitment Plan (LE1) Compliance Verified
31.2.2 Annual Analysis* (LE1) Compliance Verified
Notes: CSM Notes: ISSUE: The document added for this standard is not an analysis. AGENCY ACTION NEEDED:
The agency needs to add an analysis. ASSESSOR NOTES: The agency included the documentation that will provide
for the analysis at the end of 2018.

32 Selection
32.1.1 Selection Process Described (LE1) Compliance Verified
32.2.1 Background Investigations (LE1) Compliance Verified
32.2.7 Medical Examinations (LE1) Compliance Verified
32.2.8 Emotional Stability/Psychological Fitness Examinations (LE1) Compliance Verified
33 Training and Career Development
33.1.4 Lesson Plan Requirements (LE1) Compliance Verified
33.1.5 Remedial Training (LE1) Compliance Verified
33.1.6 Employee Training Record Maintenance (LE1) Compliance Verified
33.1.7 Training Class Records Maintenance (LE1) Compliance Verified
33.4.1 Entry Level Training Required (LE1) Compliance Verified
33.4.3 Field Training Program (LE1) Compliance Verified
Notes: CSM Notes: ISSUE: Regarding bullet "a", the field training duration is not included in the written directive.
AGENCY ACTION NEEDED: The agency needs to add field training duration of at least four weeks in their written
directive. ASSESSOR NOTES: The agency added the field training information requested.
33.5.1 Annual Retraining Program* (LE1) Compliance Verified

13
Standards Findings
33.5.3 Accreditation Training (LE1) Compliance Verified
Notes: CSM Notes: ISSUE: Regarding bullet "a", the written directive does not include the required time period for
accreditation information, "within thirty days after after their employment begins or within thirty days after
completing the recruiting academy." AGENCY ACTION NEEDED: The agency needs to add, "within thirty days" in
their written directive. ASSESSOR NOTES: The agency adjusted the directive to reflect a minimum of 15 days after
the completion of the academy.
33.6.2 Tactical Team Training Program (LE1) Compliance Verified
33.8.2 Skill Development Training Upon Promotion (LE1) Compliance Verified
34 Promotion
34.1.3 Promotional Process Described (LE1) Compliance Verified
34.1.7 Promotional Probation (LE1) Compliance Verified
35 Performance Evaluation
35.1.1 Performance Evaluation System (LE1) Compliance Verified
35.1.2 Annual Evaluation* (LE1) Compliance Verified
35.1.7 Employee Counseling (LE1) Compliance Verified
35.1.9 Personnel Early Warning System* (LE1) Compliance Verified
Notes: CSM Notes: ISSUE: Provisions to initiate a review based on current patterns of collected material are not
clearly established in the written directive. AGENCY ACTION NEEDED: The directive needs to clearly state the a
review. ASSESSOR NOTES: The agency added a three incident minimum to the EW system, which will activate a
review for the employees record by the leagl department.
41 Patrol
41.1.4 Agency Animals (LE1) Compliance Verified
41.2.1 Responding Procedures (LE1) Compliance Verified
Notes: CSM Notes: ISSUE: The written directive does not include responding procedures for routine calls AGENCY
ACTION NEEDED: The written directive needs to include responding procedures for routine calls. ASSESSOR
NOTES: The agency re-wrote the directive in its entirety to include three levels of response priorities based on the
severity of the call.
41.2.2 Pursuit of Motor Vehicles* (LE1) Compliance Verified
41.2.3 Roadblocks and Forcible Stopping* (LE1) Compliance Verified
Notes: CSM Notes: ISSUE: - The standard has no written directive in the file and is marked in compliance. AGENCY
ACTION NEEDED: the agency needs to add a written directive or mark as N/A (if not applicable). ASSESSOR
NOTES: Roadblocks and forcible stops are prohibited. The agency added that the use of the patrol vehicle in forcible
stops can only be done under deadly force situations and with authorization.
41.2.4 Notification Procedures (LE1) Compliance Verified
41.2.5 Missing Persons (LE1) Compliance Verified
Notes: CSM Notes: ISSUE: The requirements for bullets "a" and "f" are not added to the written directive. AGENCY
ACTION NEEDED: The agency needs to add the requirements for bullets "a" and "f" to their written directive.
ASSESSOR NOTES: The agency developed a specific form to be used by officers to fill out missing person or mental
health.

14
Standards Findings
41.2.6 Missing Children (LE1) Compliance Verified
Notes: CSM Notes: ISSUE: The requirements for bullets "e" and "f" are not added to the written directive. AGENCY
ACTION NEEDED: The agency needs to add the requirements for bullets "e" and "f" to their written directive.
ASSESSOR NOTES: The agency modified the directive for bullet E, but bullet F is not applicable because the
responsibility to follow through on such a case lies with the state police.
41.2.7 Mental Illness* (LE1) Compliance Verified
Notes: CSM Notes: ISSUE: All bullets are out of compliance. AGENCY ACTION NEEDED: A written directive
needs to be added containing all requirements in this standard. ASSESSOR NOTES: The agency changed the
directive in bullets A and B to reflect the procedures that are within the agency's capabilities. If the illness is so
severe and beyond the resources of the agency, the person will be turned over to he respective State mental health
agency. The agency exceeds the re-training requirement for every three years, by requiring annual re-training.

41.3.2 Equipment Specification/Replenishment (LE1) Compliance Verified

41.3.5 Protective Vests (LE1) Compliance Verified
41.3.6 Protective Vests/Pre-Planned High Risk Situations (LE1) Compliance Verified
41.3.8 In-Car Audio/Video (LE1) Not Applicable by Function
42 Criminal Investigation
42.1.3 Case File Management (LE1) Compliance Verified
42.1.6 Criminal Intelligence* (LE1) Compliance Verified
42.2.1 Preliminary Investigations Steps (LE1) Compliance Verified
42.2.7 Informants (LE1) Compliance Verified
42.2.10 Interview Rooms (LE1) Compliance Verified
43 Vice Drugs and Organized Crime
43.1.1 Complaint Management (LE1) Compliance Verified
43.1.5 Covert Operations (LE1) Compliance Verified
44 Juvenile Operations
44.1.1 Juvenile Operations Policy (LE1) Compliance Verified
44.2.1 Handling Offenders (LE1) Compliance Verified
44.2.2 Procedures for Custody (LE1) Compliance Verified
44.2.3 Custodial Interrogation (LE1) Compliance Verified
46 Critical Incidents Special Operations and Homeland Security
46.1.1 Planning Responsibility (LE1) Compliance Verified
46.1.2 All Hazard Plan (LE1) Compliance Verified
46.1.3 Command Function* (LE1) Compliance Verified
46.1.4 Operations Function (LE1) Compliance Verified

46.1.5 Planning Function (LE1) Compliance Verified

15
Standards Findings
46.1.6 Logistics Function (LE1) Compliance Verified
46.1.7 Finance/Administration Function (LE1) Compliance Verified
46.1.9 Annual Training* (LE1) Compliance Verified
46.1.10 Active Threats* (LE1) Compliance Verified
46.2.7 Special Events Plan (LE1) Compliance Verified
46.3.1 Liaison with other Organizations (LE1) Compliance Verified
46.3.4 Hazmat Awareness (LE1) Compliance Verified
52 Internal Affairs
52.1.1 Complaint Investigation (LE1) Compliance Verified
Notes: CSM Notes: ISSUE: - The standard refers to complaints made about agency employees and the written
directive is addressing complaint calls made by citizens requiring police services. AGENCY ACTION NEEDED: The
written directive needs to be rewritten to address complaints about agency employees. ASSESSOR NOTES: The
agency modified the directive to reflect that ALL complaints will be taken and the investigations will be conducted
by the legal department.
52.1.2 Records Maintenance and Security (LE1) Compliance Verified
52.1.3 CEO Direct Accessibility (LE1) Compliance Verified
52.2.1 Complaint Types (LE1) Compliance Verified
52.2.3 Investigation Time Limits (LE1) Compliance Verified
54 Public Information
54.1.3 News Media Access (LE1) Compliance Verified
55 Victim/Witness Assistance
55.2.6 Next-of-Kin Notification (LE1) Compliance Verified
61 Traffic
61.1.2 Uniform Enforcement Procedures (LE1) Compliance Verified
61.1.3 Violator Procedures (LE1) Compliance Verified
61.1.4 Informing The Violator (LE1) Compliance Verified
Notes: CSM Notes: ISSUE: If the agency does not perform any of the bulleted items in the standard it should be
noted in the written directive. AGENCY ACTION NEEDED:The written directive needs to state that the agency
doesn't perform the bulleted items, bullets A and B. ASSESSOR NOTES: The agency re-wrote the directive for
bullets A and B to reflect current laws that incentivize the violator to pay the fine that day for a discount, or within 15
days to get reduced additional discounts. There is not requirement to appear within a certain time period.

61.1.5 Uniform Enforcement Policies (LE1) Compliance Verified

61.1.7 Stopping/Approaching (LE1) Compliance Verified
61.1.11 DUI Procedures (LE1) Compliance Verified
61.3.2 Direction/Control Procedures (LE1) Compliance Verified

16
Standards Findings
61.3.3 Escorts (LE1) Compliance Verified
61.4.1 Assistance Highway Users (LE1) Compliance Verified
61.4.2 Hazardous Highway Conditions (LE1) Compliance Verified
61.4.3 Towing (LE1) Compliance Verified
70 Detainee Transportation
70.1.1 Pre-Transport Prisoner Searches (LE1) Compliance Verified
70.1.2 Searching Transport Vehicles (LE1) Compliance Verified
70.1.6 Procedures Transport Destination (LE1) Compliance Verified
70.1.7 Procedures Escape* (LE1) Compliance Verified
70.1.8 Notify Court of Security Hazard (LE1) Compliance Verified
70.2.1 Prisoner Restraint Requirement (LE1) Compliance Verified
70.4.2 Rear Compartment Modifications (LE1) Compliance Verified
71 Processing and Temporary Detention
71.1.1 Designate Rooms or Areas (LE1) Compliance Verified
71.2.1 Training of Personnel* (LE1) Compliance Verified
71.3.1 Procedures (LE1) Compliance Verified
71.3.3 Security (LE1) Compliance Verified
71.4.1 Physical Conditions (LE1) Compliance Verified
71.4.2 Fire Prevention/Suppression (LE1) Compliance Verified
71.4.3 Inspections* (LE1) Compliance Verified

71.5.1 Security Concerns in Designated Processing or Testing Rooms/Areas (LE1) Compliance Verified
72 Holding Facility
72.1.1 Training User Personnel* (LE1) Compliance Verified
Notes: CSM Notes: ISSUE: The standard calls for retraining at a minimum every three years. AGENCY ACTION
NEEDED:The written directive needs to be rewritten to reflect that. ASSESSOR NOTES: The agency modified the
directive to reflect the need for retraining every year, or upon assignment.
72.4.1 Securing Firearms (LE1) Compliance Verified
72.5.3 Sight and Sound Separation (LE1) Compliance Verified
73 Court Security
73.1.1 Role Authority Policies (LE1) Compliance Verified
73.3.1 Weapon Lockboxes (LE1) Compliance Verified
73.4.2 External Communications (LE1) Compliance Verified
73.5.12 Securing Firearms (LE1) Compliance Verified

17
Standards Findings
73.5.18 Designated Control Point (LE1) Compliance Verified
74 Legal Process
74.1.1 Information Recording (LE1) Compliance Verified
81 Communications
81.2.1 24 Hour Toll-Free Service (LE1) Compliance Verified
81.2.2 Continuous Two-Way Capability (LE1) Compliance Verified
81.2.3 Recording Information (LE1) Compliance Verified
81.2.4 Radio Communications Procedures (LE1) Compliance Verified
81.2.5 Access to Resources (LE1) Compliance Verified
81.2.8 Recording and Playback (LE1) Compliance Verified
81.2.12 Misdirected Emergency Calls (LE1) Compliance Verified
81.2.14 First Aid Over Phone (LE1) Compliance Verified
81.3.1 Communications Center Security (LE1) Compliance Verified
81.3.2 Alternate Power Source* (LE1) Compliance Verified

82 Central Records
82.1.1 Privacy and Security (LE1) Compliance Verified
82.1.2 Juvenile Records (LE1) Compliance Verified
82.1.6 Computer File Backup and Storage* (LE1) Compliance Verified
82.2.1 Field Reporting System (LE1) Compliance Verified
82.2.2 Reporting Requirements (LE1) Compliance Verified
82.2.3 Case Numbering System (LE1) Compliance Verified
82.3.4 Traffic Citation Maintenance (LE1) Compliance Verified
83 Collection and Preservation of Evidence
83.1.1 24 Hour Availability (LE1) Compliance Verified
83.2.1 Guidelines and Procedures (LE1) Compliance Verified
83.2.4 Equipment and Supplies (LE1) Compliance Verified
83.2.6 Report Preparation (LE1) Compliance Verified
83.3.2 Evidence Laboratory Submission (LE1) Compliance Verified
84 Property and Evidence Control
84.1.1 Evidence/Property Control System (LE1) Compliance Verified
84.1.2 Storage and Security (LE1) Compliance Verified
84.1.3 Temporary Security (LE1) Compliance Verified
18
Standards Findings
84.1.4 Security of Controlled Substances Weapons for Training (LE1) Compliance Verified
84.1.5 Records Status of Property (LE1) Not Applicable by Function
84.1.6 Inspections and Reports* (LE1) Compliance Verified
91 Campus Law Enforcement
91.1.1 Risk Assessment and Analysis* (LE1) Not Applicable by Function
91.1.3 Campus Background Investigation (LE1) Not Applicable by Function
91.1.4 Campus Security Escort Service (LE1) Not Applicable by Function
91.1.5 Emergency Notification System (LE1) Not Applicable by Function
91.1.7 Behavioral Threat Assessment (LE1) Not Applicable by Function
91.1.8 Security Camera Responsibilities* (LE1) Not Applicable by Function
91.1.9 Emergency Only Phones and Devices* (LE1) Not Applicable by Function
91.1.10 Administrative Investigation Procedures (LE1) Not Applicable by Function
91.2.1 Agency Role and Responsibilities (LE1) Not Applicable by Function
91.3.1 Agency Role and Responsibilities (LE1) Not Applicable by Function
91.4.1 Position Responsible for Clery Act* (LE1) Not Applicable by Function

Response from Agency Regarding Findings:

CEO Feedback not provided.

19
Assessment Report 2018 November 08, 2018

SITE-BASED ASSESSMENT
11/8/2018

Planning and Methodology:

During the week of August 9th, two assessors conducted the initial file review for the agency. Of the 188 standards
reviewed, 21 were in need of some manner of adjustment. The agency was notified of the needed changes and began
to work on that process prior to the onsite assessment. Prior to the team's departure at the end of the site based review,
the agency had made all of the necessary adjustments to the 21 standard files that were previously identified and all
files were found to be in compliance.

On Friday August 24th, a conference call between the agency CEO, his accreditation manager and members of the
onsite team took place. The discussion centered around the outstanding files that were in the process of being adjusted
and the onsite agenda. Due to the narrow time lines set for the onsite, the discussion with the CEO focused on critical
operations only. One of those operations is the public CCTV system throughout the city center area, which ties into
agency's extensive work in leveraging social media as a technological "Eyes and Ears" program. One other very
important scheduling requirement was meeting the Mayor of Metepec, who has been a strong advocate for this
process. The Team Leader provided an outline of topic areas to both the assessment team, and to the agency, that will
work as a guide for both on critical areas of focus, and will compliment the agency's agenda.

Recruitment
When recruits are hired by the agency, they attend a police academy in the neighboring City of Toluca. The academy
consists of 972 hours of training in all aspects of national, state and municipal law. Once the recruit has graduated
form the academy, they participate in a field training program that lasts for four to five weeks, the recruit is then
assigned to an experienced officer for the next one to two years as a patrol partner.

The team met with the employee responsible with the recruitment process for the SPTMM, Ms. Marta Sandra Montoya
Garcia. Ms. Montoya described in detail the recruitment process for the SPTMM. On average, the agency will seek to
fill roughly 25 police positions each year to address staffing attrition. The process starts with advertisements on the
City social media pages and thorough the local media outlets. The agency also posts banners and posters around the
City. Agency staff members attend job fairs and local public areas to set up recruiting information kiosks. The agency
receives approximately 200 applicants each hiring process, which is then sifted down to the final list of qualified
candidates.

The candidates must fill out a personal background packet and also provide a letter that they have no criminal record.
This information is then verified through a background investigation service contracted through the State government.
The candidate will undergo a physical examination, polygraph, toxicology and psychological testing, along with an
economic background assessment. Once the final candidates are chosen, they are then sent to a regional academy for
training. When asked about the challenge of recruiting female candidates (the agency reports that female sworn
officers represent about 15% of the sworn staff), Ms. Montoya stated it is a challenge due to cultural implications.
However, she said that they are making progress in that regard.

Standards Issues:
None noted
20
Suggestions

DETAINEES
The Director explained to the team that the SPTMM is considered a prevention police agency. As such, the agency is
limited in what type of cases that they investigate. All misdemeanor crimes are the responsibility of the SPTMM,
while all felonies are passed on to the Ministerial (State ) Police. In close cases, the decision whether the crime is one
or the other falls to the "Solicitor's Office.

The agency houses only the misdemeanents, who cannot be held more than 36 hours. The agency provided the team
with a tour of the holding facility. The assessors viewed the female and juvenile holding areas, all separated from each
other and the male cells for sight and sound considerations. The team could not view the male area due to the fact that
there were several detainees currently housed in them. The area was was clean and well ordered. For the benefit of
the detainee, the agency had placed a flow-chart graphic on the back wall of the processing area, that depicts the
detainee process through to the court proceedings. Evacuation and fire routes diagrams were also placed in the holding
cell area.

On average, up to ten (10) detainees might be housed daily at any given time. That number might increase to 30 per
day during the weekends. The SPTMM Headquarters's is co-located in the same plaza as the Municipal Court, which is
currently undergoing renovations after damage was caused to the building during a recent earthquake. The State has
set up a temporary building between the Court and the SPTMM building where they conduct the business of the Court.

Standards Issues:
None noted

Suggestions

FUTURE ISSUES
Team members met with the Director on Wednesday, August 29, to discuss his future concerns for his agency.
Director Rameriz stated quite emphatically that he wished to raise the level of professionalism for his staff, along with
training and education. The Director believes strongly that; to overcome the long-held negative perceptions that
residents of his community and throughout Mexico, have of the police, they must move to higher levels of professional
service and deportment. His goal is to have the level of professionalism demonstrated by his officers, is equal to the
laws of Mexico.

The agency has worked very hard over the past three years to gain the respect of the community. They began by
focusing on the areas of greatest need, and ares where there was a clear disconnect with the community members.
They conducted more than forty meetings with schools, church and businesses to discuss community concerns. The
Director explained to the participants of these meetings, what efforts he and his department were making to raise the
level of professionalism within the police department.

Over the past few years, the Mexican government and judicial system made sweeping changes to Mexican laws
regarding arrest and incarceration. These changes have forced the municipal police to provide more in depth training
on human rights issues and arrest procedures. The Director believes that, as a result, the officers are better versed in
federal and state laws and developed better personal interaction skills that have opened up communication with people
during critical events, A testament to the success of building on those communication skills is the agency's Use of
Force table. The agency recorded only two (2) use of physical force engagements in 2017. In a municipality of more
than a quarter of a million people, that is an incredible demonstration of restraint and mutual respect between the police
and the community they serve.

In a candid conversation with the Director and his second in Command, Marco Antonio Lopez Garcia, he openly
addressed the very sensitive, but widely held, perceptions of police corruption in Mexican policing. Not shying away
21
from the topic, the Director spoke to how he addressed the issue in his own agency by identifying those officers, who
have had a history of negative public encounters, and reassigned them to non-public contact positions. The Director
strongly believes that ethical behavior starts at the top, and he has made his position very clear when it comes to
addressing unethical behaviors within his organization.

Standards Issues:
None noted

Suggestions

TRAINING
The agency conducts annual firearms qualification for all personnel, even though the government of Mexico requires
qualification once every three years. Unique to Mexico is how the agency arms their officers. The Mexican military
issue the patrol pistols and rifles to the state, who in turn issues the weapons to the individual agencies. The officers
will then be issued a pistol. After qualifying with the pistol, the serial number will be recorded and a card is issued to
the officer continuing personal information and the serial number of the weapon issued. When the officer arrives for
duty, they report to the agency armory to be issued their firearm. The armory is a secure vault that does not allow
anyone inside without authorization. At the end of the officers shift, they will return to the armory and turn their
weapon into the armorer. The Mexican government conducts an audit every six months on the weapons assigned to
the agency.

Standards Issues:
None noted

Suggestions

CRIME PREVENTION
According to the Director of the Direccion de Seguridad Publica y Transito del Municipio de Metepec (SPTMM), Jesus
Alberto Rameriz Manzur, the number one crime in Metepec is auto theft, followed by domestic violence. When asked
about the auto theft crimes, the director pointed out that the thieves pick on one particular car made by Nissan. These
cars are easily stolen and are parted out on the black market, mostly to the taxi businesses, due to the fact that this
model is widley used through out Mexico for the taxi industry.

To combat the problem, the SPTMM utilized the City's expansive public CCTV system to ficus on these cars. They
provided a video to the team showing that actual theft of one these cars that was caught on camera. Through the
agency's Criminal Intelligence Unit, the suspects in a large number of these thefts was identified and arrested. The
suspect was using his own children and others to steal these cars and sell them to "chop shops." It was estimated that
this individual and his "crew" were responsible for the theft or more then 300 cars.

The camera system that was recently implemented by the agency consists of more than 400 CCTV cameras that have
been placed through the center portion of the town. A good portion of these cameras were paid for by the State of
mexico and the Federal government. The City of Metepec also paid for a number of the cameras. Once installed, the
SPTMM opened, what can be considered a state-of-the-art intelligence fusion center, which is securely located in a
municipal building. The team was taken on a tour of the facility.

Upon entrance into the area of the Center, the team encountered a heavily armed police officer at the entrance.
Fingerprint ID systems are in place to allow entry along with a pass code. Once inside the Center the team observed a
wall of TV monitors that was probably 30 to 4090 feet long, containing dozens of monitors. Located in front of these
monitors was 15 SPTMM officers who were sitting at long tables and were monitoring individual screens in
22
front them. The team was introduced to the supervisor who explained how the system works.

The room is staffed 24 - 7. The officers who monitor the screens are assigned to a district where they randomly scan
the cameras located in that district. If they observe any suspicious or illegal activity, they can zoom in on the action by
using the camera systems pan and tilt capabilities. Once they locate the target of their concern, they can project that
image on the wall monitors. The staff demonstrated how they could identify a vehicle in a parking lot, then zoom in on
the license plate to get the plate number. In support of the cameras, the room houses one officer who access to the
CAD system. If the agency receives a 911 call, that information is immediately passed on to the officer monitoring the
cameras in tat district. The cameras are geo-located and the officer can see a visual of where the cameras are located
in the area of the call and activate those cameras as the assigned police cars are heading into the area of the call.

Additionally, the CAD system provides a 24 hour "look-back" graphic of calls for service by district. An officer
monitors the graphics and provides that information to the officers monitoring the cameras, and to the officers on the
street. The pie graphs offer the viewer the type of crimes committed and the temporal information of those crimes,
over the past 24 hours. Patrols can monitor those areas based on the information provided along with their colleagues at
the camera monitors. This team approach was instrumental in catching the "family" car theft ring.

The agency relies heavily on social media for daily passive surveillance out on the street. Unique just to Metepec, City
residents can subscribe to a City APP that allows the user to activate a call if they see a crime being committed. The
user activates the app that sends the callers geo-location, to the 911-Communications Center. The caller can actually
activate their cell phone's camera system ad transmit the video directly to the agency, in real time. The Center's
supervisor stated that the greatest number of those calls are regarding crashes and the Center can send the
appropriate units based on what they can determine - visually - of the severity of the crash. According to the
Mayor and Director, the SPTMM is scheduled add an additional 100 cameras over the next year. These cameras will
be placed in some of the outlying areas around the City.

In order to address the high number of domestic violence crimes, the agency worked with a number of community
organizations to open up a mediation center in the City Centro area. The Center provides support for
domestic violence victims and offers mediation opportunities for families. The mediators will actually respond to the
location of the incident if requested and begin the remediation process on site.

Standards Issues:
None noted

Suggestions

Summary:
Number of Interviews Conducted: 8
Interviewers' Names: James Carmody and Xavier Benevides
Site-Based Assessment Start Date: 08/28/2018
Site-Based Assessment End Date: 08/30/2018
Mandatory (M) Compliance 169
Other-Than-Mandatory (O) Compliance 0
Standards Issues 0
Waiver 0
23
(O) Elect 20% 0
(O) Not Applicable 19
Total: 188

Percentage of applicable other-than-mandatory standards: 0%

24
 Assessment Report 2018 November 08, 2018

COMMUNITY FEEDBACK AND REVIEW

Public Information Session
Upon arrival to the agency's headquarters, it was discovered that the MPD had not planned the telephone call-in session or
the public hearing. Under direction from the onsite team, the agency immediately placed notices on the MPD and City of
Metepec's public website, Facebook and Twitter sites announcing the time, date and location of the call-in session, and
public meeting.

The public hearing was scheduled for Wednesday, August 29 at 6:00 pm, and was well attended given the short notice.
More than 25 attendees, six staff members, the Mayor and two city council members were seated in the City Council
Meeting room for the public comment forum. During the public session, Mayor David Lopez Cardenas spoke to the
commitment of his office and the city council in providing community residents and visitors, only the best in professional
public safety services. The Mayor spoke of recent studies in Mexico where personal safety was the number one priority
listed by the survey participants. He went on to speak of is pride in the MPD and its administrative team and listed a
number of accomplishments the agency has made in regards to reaching out to the community in order to begin the
process of building a stronger bond between the police and those whom they serve.

Two (2) participants to the public hearing signed up to speak; however, they asked questions regarding how the
accreditation process worked and what impact accreditation would have on the community. There were three (3) local
news media representatives and five (5) MPD staff members present at the public session as well.

Telephone Contacts
The call-in session was scheduled for Wednesday, August 30, from 3:00 pm to 4:00 pm. No calls were received that day.

Correspondence
No correspondence was produced - or received - by the team during this assessment.

Media Interest
During the public forum, the agency identified three of the participants to be member's of area news organizations.
However, the team did not receive either news paper articles or videos regarding that coverage.

Public Information Material

After being reminded that the agency needed to conduct both a public call-in sessions and public forum, the MPD
accreditation team set about immediately to place notices on their MPD and City of Metepec's public websites, the
agency's Facebook page and Twitter site, announcing the time, date and location of the call-in session, and public
meeting.

Community Outreach Contacts

Due to the volume of file adjustments and a tightly structured organizational agenda, the assessment team had very little
time to interact with members of the community. However, while on a break, the team was able to engage a local
restaurant owner. She told the team that the building where her restaurant is located, is more than 200 years old and has
been in her family for decades. She spoke of the "family" environment of the business community throughout Metepec
and recognized that the MPD is part of that family. Even with a population of more than 270,000 residents she - and
many others that the team met - considered Metepec as a small town.
25
Assessment Report 2018 November 08, 2018

STATISTICS AND DATA TABLES

Overview
The following information reflects empirical data submitted by the candidate agency specifically related to CALEA
Standards. Although the data does not confirm compliance with the respective standards, they are indicators of the
impact of the the agency’s use of standards to address the standards' intent

Traffic Warnings & Citations - Initial Accreditation

Race/Sex Warnings Citations Total
White Non-Hispanic Male 0 0 0
Black Non-Hispanic Male 0 0 0
Hispanic Latino Any Race Male 0 0 0
Other Male 0 5745 5745
White Non-Hispanic Female 0 0 0
Black Non-Hispanic Female 0 0 0
Hispanic Latino Any Race Female 0 0 0
Other Female 0 2298 2298
TOTAL 0 8043 8043

Initial Accreditation Notes:

In the Direction of Public Safety and Traffic of Metepec the registration of Hispanic Americans is not carried out because there is no division of races in the c
ity, so the data presented in this table are about citizens of another type of race.

The data that is recorded are the cases in which men and women have been infracted, however within this agency the following item applies:

To whom it corresponds with 14,934 infractions, this section is used by traffic officials when there is no
responsible party.
Male Citations Female Citations

Legend
White Non-Hispanic Male
Black Non-Hispanic Male
Hispanic Latino Any Race Male

26
Other Male

27
Biased Based Profiling
Complaints from: Inital
Traffic Contacts 0
Field Contacts 0
Asset Forfeiture 0

Initial Accreditation Notes:

In this agency responsible for compliance with the law is not allowed to make profiles based on bias of any kind
because it has a certification called "Empresa Incluyente"

Initial Accreditation

Legend
Traffic Contacts
Field Contacts
Asset Forfeiture

28
Use Of Force - Initial Accreditation
White Non-Hispanic Black Non-Hispanic Hispanic Latino Any Race Other Total
Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female
Firearm 0
Discharge 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Display Only 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ECW 0
Discharge Only 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Display Only 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Canine 0
Release Only 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Release and Bite 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Uses of Force 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
Total Number of 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Incidents Resulting
In Officer Injury or
Death
Total Use of Force 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
Arrests
Total Number of 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
Suspects Receiving
Non-Fatal Injuries
Total Number of 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Suspects Receiving
Fatal Injuries
Total Agency 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Custodial Arrests
Total Use of Force 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Complaints

Initial Accreditation Notes:

The agency recognizes five (5) levels of force; presence, verbal, muscling , less lethal and lethal. The officers are
encouraged and trained to show tremendous restraint during stressful or violent encounters, and use deescalation
techniques to bring the situation to a non-violent ending. It obviously works! The agency recorded only two (2)
applications of any level of force, outside of officer presence, for 2917.

Initial Accreditation Charts

29
Weaponless Total Uses of Force

Total Use of Force Arrests Total Number of Suspects Receiving Non-Fatal Injuries

Legend
White Non-Hispanic Male
White Non-Hispanic Female
Black Non-Hispanic Male
Black Non-Hispanic Female
Hispanic Latino Any Race Male
Hispanic Latino Any Race Female
Other Male
Other Female

30
Grievances
Grievances Inital
Number 0

Initial Accreditation Notes:

In this agency there have been no formal grievances of any kind for which this table will be presented in zero.

31
Personnel Actions
Inital
Suspension 2
Demotion 0
Resign In Lieu of Termination 13
Termination 2
Other 0
Total 17
Commendations 308

Initial Accreditation Notes:

This table shows the number of cases where the cases in which the elements decide their position for any reason
are observed.

32
Complaints and Internal Affairs - Initial Accreditation
Inital

External/Citizen Complaint
Citizen Complaint 120
Sustained 90
Not Sustained 16
Unfounded 14
Exonerated 0

Internal/Directed Complaint
Directed Complaint 4
Sustained 1
Not Sustained 2
Unfounded 1
Exonerated 0

Initial Accreditation Notes:

Cases in which different types of complaints have been presented against the personnel or the same institution,
likewise the situations addressed and not addressed to this unit are presented.

33
Calls For Service - Initial Accreditation
Inital
Murder 18
Forcible Rape 1
Robbery 1872
Aggravated Assault 371
Burglary 347
Larceny-Theft 112
Motor Vehicle Theft 526
Arson 0

Initial Accreditation Notes:

Table in which the criminal incidence of the year 2017 is gradually represented.

34
Motor Vehicle Pursuit
Inital
Pursuits
Total Pursuits 216
Forcible stopping techniques used 0
Terminated by Agency 194
Policy Compliant 0
Policy Non-Compliant 0
Collisions
Injuries
Total Collisions 0
Officer 0
Suspect 0
ThirdParty 0
Reason Initiated
Traffic 0
Felony 22
Misdemeanor 0

35
Agency Breakdown Report - Initial Accreditation
White Non-Hispanic Black Non-Hispanic Hispanic Latino Any Race Other Total
Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female
Sworn Personnel
Executive 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Command 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3
Supervisory 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 1 39
Positions
Non-Supervisory 0 0 0 0 0 0 257 43 300
Positions
Sub Total 343
Non Sworn Personnel
Executive 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Managerial 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
Supervisory 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
Positions
Non-Supervisory 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 20 44
Positions
Sub Total 48
Total 391

Initial Accreditation Notes:

The way in which the hierarchical positions of this agency are distributed from the director to the commanders
is presented.

Initial Accreditation Charts

Total Sworn Personnel Sworn Personnel: Executive

36
Sworn Personnel: Command Sworn Personnel: Supervisory Positions

Sworn Personnel: Non-Supervisory Positions Total Non-Sworn Personnel

Non-Sworn Personnel: Managerial Non-Sworn Personnel: Supervisory Positions

Non-Sworn Personnel: Non-Supervisory Positions

Legend
White Non-Hispanic Male
White Non-Hispanic Female
Black Non-Hispanic Male
Black Non-Hispanic Female
Hispanic Latino Any Race Male
Hispanic Latino Any Race Female
Other Male

37
Other Female

38
Agency Demographics Report - Initial Accreditation
Service Available Current Current Female Prior Sworn Prior Female
Population Workforce Sworn Sworn Officers Officers Sworn Officers
Officers
# % # % # % # % # % # %
White Non- 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Hispanic
Black Non- 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Hispanic
Hispanic Latino 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Any Race
Other 227827 100% 252 100 % 299 100% 44 14% 0 0% 0 0%
Total 227827 252 299 44 0 0

Initial Accreditation Notes:

In this table the municipal demiography is presented where the amount of juridical and administrative officers
that work within this institution can be appreciated.

Initial Accreditation Charts

Service Population Available Workforce

Current Sworn Officers Current Sworn Female Officers

Legend
White Non-Hispanic
Black Non-Hispanic
Hispanic Latino Any Race
Other

39
Sworn Officer Selection - Initial Accreditation
White Non-Hispanic Black Non-Hispanic Hispanic Latino Any Race Other Total
Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female
Applications 0 0 0 0 0 0 85 16 101
Recieved
Applicants Hired 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 9 44
Percent Hired % % % % % % 41% 56% N/A
Percent of 0% 0% 0% 15% N/A
Workforce
Population

Initial Accreditation Notes:

Statistics that indicate the amount of items of new income to this institution during the year 2016 - 2017
The agency considers an applicant as those who have successfully competed their background investigation
and have had their qualifications and education verified.
Applications Recieved Applicants Hired

Percent Hired Percent of Workforce Population

Legend
White Non-Hispanic Male
White Non-Hispanic Female
Black Non-Hispanic Male
Black Non-Hispanic Female
Hispanic Latino Any Race Male
Hispanic Latino Any Race Female
Other Male
40
Other Female

41
Sworn Officer Promotions - Initial Accreditation
White Non-Hispanic Black Non-Hispanic Hispanic Latino Any Race Other Total
Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female
Tested 0 0 0 0 0 0 89 2 91
Eligible After 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 2 28
Testing
Promoted 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 2 28
Percent Promoted % % % % % % 29 % 100 % N/A

Initial Accreditation Notes:

Statistics that represents the number of elements of this dependency that were evaluated for degree promotions
and who met the requested
Tested Eligible After Testing

Promoted Percent Promoted

Legend
White Non-Hispanic Male
White Non-Hispanic Female
Black Non-Hispanic Male
Black Non-Hispanic Female
Hispanic Latino Any Race Male
Hispanic Latino Any Race Female
Other Male
Other Female

42
43