1. What is the level of quantum leadership of school heads as perceived by
teachers in terms of:
1.1 leader’s perspective,
1.2 organizational structure or design,
1.3 motivational value state, and
1.4 needs value state?
MEAN SD INTERPRETATION
Leader’s Perspective 4.24 0.84
Organizational structure or design 4.26 0.82 Motivational value state 4.25 0.84 4.20 0.74 Needs value state 4.24 0.73 Overall Table 1. Level of Quantum Leadership
2. What is the level of commitment of school heads as perceived by teachers
in terms of:
2.1 affective commitment,
2.2 continuance commitment, and
2.3 normative commitment?
Table 2. Level of School Head’s Commitment
3. What is the level of commitment of teachers in terms of:
Commitment to students 4.47 0.65 Commitment to Teaching 4.49 0.60 4.49 0.62 Commitment to the profession 4.49 0.58 Overall Table 3. Level of Teacher’s Commitment
4. Is there a significant relationship between:
4.1 quantum leadership and commitment of teachers, and
4.2 commitment of school heads and commitment of teachers?
5. Do quantum leadership and the commitment of school heads significantly
influence the commitment of teachers?
Based on the result, model 2 (R-squared=54.5%) is best fit model for
predicting commitment of teachers. The factors that significantly influenced
commitment of teachers are quantum leadership in terms of organizational