Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Daniel Bogle
Professor Gardiakos
ENC 1102
18 November 2022
Discrepancies between the terminology in research and YouTube videos found in the resistance
training community
Introduction
The introduction of the internet has completely changed the landscape of the world,
especially in terms of education. It has led to platforms, like YouTube, where people can share
videos which can be meant for entertainment, education, or other things. The educational videos
on YouTube have resulted in a large amount of people turning to YouTube to find out
information instead of research studies. This is true as well for the fitness community and the
Dr. Stone et al. in their article “Weightlifting: A Brief Overview”, resistance training will be the
term used to refer to exercises performed with free weights and machines, because weightlifting
is a competition in the Olympics where people perform two exercises that implement resistance
training (Stone, et al.). Resistance training is a heavily researched topic, but the majority of the
research implements medical terminology because fitness is heavily linked with medical terms.
Medical terminology in the past has been difficult for many of those without the proper
education to understand because of how complex and intricate it is; however, studies such as
those done by Fage Butler and Jensen have showed that there has been an increase in medical
literacy in e-patients which the authors believe has started because of the internet and people’s
interest in their personal health. This has led to more YouTubers in the fitness industry willing to
Bogle 2
implement medical terminology into their videos because they are teaching their viewers how to
properly exercise, while teaching them medical terms or how to understand medical terms.
Which is why, the purpose of this research paper is to find out the extent of discrepancies
between the language used in research communities and three YouTube channels all of which are
Background
This researcher became interested in the topic because he enjoys resistance training and
he has family that has taught him some medical terms, which meant he understood some of the
research language. However, not everyone has that background with medical terms which led to
the question of how people in the discourse community speak versus how researchers speak. The
resistance training community contains multiple communities and ideas which contradict each
other, with some people relying on research to build muscle and strength while others say
research is a hindrance to a person’s ability to grow in strength and muscle. The research is
typically split into two goals bodybuilding and powerlifting. “Bodybuilding” is when someone is
trying to maximize their muscle size to look a certain way, which typically is associated with
having a lower bodyfat percentage while maintaining a lot of muscle mass. In an article written
by Suffolk, a researcher from North Dakota State University who was pursuing his PhD before
his untimely death, competitive bodybuilding was described as “an aesthetic pursuit that relies on
somatic form as opposed to any apparent display of functional ability” (Suffolk). The article is
saying that competitive bodybuilding is based entirely on somatic aspects, or how a body looks.
On the other hand, lifting weights to get stronger, or “powerlifting”, is when someone lifts
weights to be able to lift even heavier weights; this style of training does not focus on having a
lower bodyfat or looking a certain way typically. This description of powerlifting works well
Bogle 3
with a study written by Dr. Farland and Dr. Comtois, where competitive powerlifting was
described as “a sport of relative and absolute maximal strength that includes 3 events: the squat,
the bench press, and the deadlift. Participants have 3 attempts in each event to lift a maximal
load in a single repetition while respecting judging criteria” (Farland, Comtois). The differences
between the goals does not mean that bodybuilders are not strong or that powerlifters do not have
muscles it is simply a difference in their goals. This study will focus on three different YouTube
channels that each explain resistance training from a bodybuilding and powerlifting perspectives.
Youtube Channels
The first channel which will be analyzed is the Jeff Nippard channel which is run by Jeff
Nippard. He has 3.38 million subscribers, and his most popular video has 11 million views. In
his own words he is “a Canadian [,] natural [,] pro bodybuilder and internationally-qualified
powerlifter with a BSc in biochemistry/chemistry and [has] a passion for science.” (Nippard).
His channel in his description is “dedicated to providing science-based training and nutrition
information and journaling my own fitness journey” (Nippard). In the resistance training
community on Youtube, Nippard is known for breaking down research done in the resistance
training community in terms that are easier to understand. He was chosen because of his
connection between the discourse and research sides of the resistance training community and
his expertise.
The second channel is Greg Doucette which is run by Greg Doucette. On his channel,
Greg Doucette described himself as “a Canadian IFBB Pro bodybuilder, published author,
influencer, and Guinness World Record holding powerlifter with a [b]achelor’s and [m]aster’s
[d]egree in Kinesiology” (Doucette). He has 1.61 million subscribers, and his most watched
video has 3.1 million views, but his most watched YouTube short has 7.2 million views. He is
Bogle 4
known for his resistance training advice, nutrition advice, and reaction videos. His reaction
videos are critiques of the advice or content in the other video, or it is him supporting the content
of the video.
The third channel is ATHLEAN-X™ which is run by Jeff Cavaliere. He has 13 million
subscribers, and his most viewed video has 34 million views. Cavaliere is a physical therapist
and strength coach who has coached “professional athlete[s] and celebrity clients” (Cavaliere),
according to his “about” section on his YouTube channel. He says that his channel is about
putting “the science back in strength to build muscle” and it is meant to teach people how to
“keep your muscles and joints healthy and improve your overall athleticism” (Cavaliere).
Cavaliere is known for his weekly new workout plan videos, workout advice, and stretching
advice.
Research Analysis
All three channels are run by experienced lifters in their own ways, but they occasionally
contradict each other and agree with each other. Sometimes some of them use medical and
research terms but sometimes they use generic gym slang which showcases the variety and
diversity of resistance training vocabulary and the YouTube channels that cover the community.
This concept of learning through videos and watching others do actions is not unique to the
fitness industry. In a study done by Dr. Hahn, the department chair of psychology at Furman
University, and Dr. Gershkoff, a director of the Baby Language Laboratory at Indiana University
Bloomington, it was found that both children and adults learn better through actions rather than
labels (Hahn, Gershkoff). That study may be the reasoning behind the results in a different study
by Jerrentrup, et al.. The study found that medical dramas such as House M.D. can help medical
students learn about rare diseases. The study done by Hahn and Gershkoff provides a reason as
Bogle 5
to why a show meant for entertainment can help medical students learn. This could possibly be
the reasoning behind why people choose to learn how to perform exercises properly through
YouTube. Three of the most common exercises are bench press, squat, and deadlift. The bench
press, squat, and deadlift are exercises that have been thoroughly researched and described in
research because of their designation as compound movements. In a study done by Bartsch, et al.
it was found that a bench press mainly works the chest, shoulders, triceps, and elbow flexors
(Bartsch), which makes sense when it is taken account with how Kompf and Arandjelovic
describe in their study how to properly do a bench press. A non-medical terminology version of
their research explains that a bench press is performed by a person that lays down on a bench
with their legs spread for stability as they bring a bar with weights down to their chest and then
push it up and away from their body (Kompf and Arandjelovic). The pushing motion requires the
chest to push the arms forward while the triceps work to extend and push the bar up and the
shoulders work to stabilize the bar. Multiple variations of the squat exist three of which are
talked about in a study done by Swinton, et al., in it they talk about how the variations can cause
different parts of the body to be affected more than other but overall, most of the lower body
muscles are affected by any type of squat. The deadlift is the most involved of the three exercises
because of the risk and the muscles involved. A study done by Peter Ronai, a clinical professor
in Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences and the associate editor of the American
College of Sports Medicine’s Health and Fitness Journal, explained that the deadlift works the
back muscles, leg muscles, and arm muscles mainly (Ronai). The study also split the exercise
into three phases; the starting position where an athlete will walk up to a barbell on the floor,
place their feet under the bar, use their legs to get lower, grab the bar, and get ready for the next
phase; the upward phase is where the athlete uses their legs mainly and their back to support and
Bogle 6
help move the bar up while keeping their arms straight and keeping the bar close to their shins
(Ronai). Ronai’s research is backed up by the study done by Kompf and Arandjelovic which
explains how to perform the exercise in more medical terms. Most of the studies presented have
medical terms to describe how to perform the main exercises which can make it difficult for
someone without the prior experience with medical terminology to understand, but the article
with the most medical terms in the explanations of the exercises is the study done by Kompf and
Arandjelovic. For this reason, Kompf and Arandjelovic’s research will be the one compared
Methods
The study compared the language used in weightlifting videos on the platform of
YouTube versus the language used in weightlifting research communities. The way the
comparison was done is by examining the language used in the YouTube videos and seeing if
they are the same medical and scientific terms used in the Kompf and Arandjelovic’s paper. For
the purposes of this study, a phrase or set of words that describe one thing or action will be
referred to as a term. The research paper provided a database of scientific words that can be
referred to when watching the videos; the videos were chosen according to the similarity in topic
to the research paper. This is why the topics chosen were the three most common exercises, the
bench press, the deadlift, and the squat. The only channel without videos dedicated to explaining
how to properly perform exercises was the Greg Doucette channel, however there were videos
where he explained the steps in a video that involved the exercises. In total there were nine
videos and three channels that were watched and reviewed. The way the language in each
channel was coded was through a spreadsheet with the scientific terms used in the research paper
was created, and each one each term was given a row. As the study went along it became
Bogle 7
increasingly difficult to decide what was a medical term and what was a discourse term. This led
to three different columns being created, one titled “Research”, one titled “In-Between”, and one
titled “Discourse”, and each video was given their own spreadsheet with these labels. The
“Research” column was used if a medical term was used; the “In-Between” column was used if
the scientific term was used but defined, if a medical term for the group of muscles was used, or
if a medical term was used in conjunction with a discourse term (e.g. instead of saying “humeral
adduction in the transverse plane”, “horizontal shoulder adduction” was used) ; and if the
scientific term was not used but instead a form of slang or simple term for the same term was,
then it was placed under the “Discourse” column. Each instance that a scientific term was, or
could have been used, was logged and whichever column had the most instances logged would
then be used as a label for the video. Each channel was tested against the three labels and
whichever label showed up the most for the channel was used to label the channel.
Results
The first channel analyzed was the Jeff Nippard channel. He had 3 separate videos
dedicated to explaining how to perform each one of the big three exercises. The bench press
video, titled “How to get a huge bench press with perfect technique” had a healthy mixture of
each label. In the spreadsheet the way to signify that the medical term was used or if it was “in-
between” or a “discourse” term was with a black or blue box (simply used to make box
separation more apparent), and sometimes there would be white text to signify how the term was
replaced if it was below five words. If a research term was not used or had no suitable
replacement in the video, then the section changed to a white box. If there were extra terms used
in the video that could be considered medical terms, then they were placed in the “Extras”
section. The words seen in the “Research Terms” section to the left of every Figure are only the
Bogle 8
words seen in the research paper’s section for that specific exercise, if there are words in the
video seen in the other exercises’ sections then they are placed in the “Extras” section as well.
The bench press video for Jeff Nippard can be seen in Figure 1.
(Figure 1)
Figure 1 showcases that Nippard’s bench press video was an equal mix of “Research” and “In-
Between” with both columns receiving 7 instances. Nippard’s video on the squat, “How to get a
huge squat with perfect technique (fix mistakes)”, can be seen in Figure 2.
(Figure 2)
In Figure 2, it can be seen that the “Research” section is the top section, with 7 instances. The
“Discourse” section is at 3 instances and the “In-between" section is at 3 instances as well, which
places the “Research” section far ahead of the other two. The final video from Nippard in this
study was, “Build a bigger deadlift with perfect technique (conventional form)”, which is
analyzed in Figure 3.
Bogle 9
(Figure 3)
As can be seen in Figure 3, Nippard referred to many of the smaller muscles found in the
research as the name of their combination (e.g. quadriceps refers to the vastus medialis, vastus
lateralis, vastus intermedius, and rectus femoris). The deadlift video was considered an “In-
between” video by 1 instance. At the end of the research, it was found that Jeff Nippard had two
videos classified as “Research” and two videos placed at “In-between”. Table 1 gives an
(Table 1)
All of the information in Table 1 is taken at the time of the study. For the sake of simplicity of
Bogle 10
this study, Jeff Nippard’s channel will be categorized as a “Research” channel because the squat
video received more views and likes than the deadlift video.
The next channel that was analyzed was the ATHLEAN-X™ channel run by Jeff
Cavaliere. The first video analyzed was the bench press video, “The official bench press check
(Figure 4)
Figure 4 shows that the bench press video lands squarely in the “Discourse” section with 4
instances and no instances in the other sections. The next video is the squat video which was
titled "How to squat properly (major form fix)” and it can be seen in Figure 5.
(Figure 5)
Similar to Figure 4, Figure 5 shows that the squat video is also entirely just a “Discourse” video
with no other instances in the other sections. The third video, the deadlift video, titled “The
(Figure 6)