DISTRICT COURT OF MINNESOTA TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT Waraier County lestice CENTER CATHERINE MCPHERSON 3700 BaADoOCE AVENUENE, ROOM 1100 Jepce oF District Count BUFFALO, MiNEsor4 $8313 (53,682-3538 July 21, 2022 Donald Mashak Route 1, Box 231 Albertville, MN 55301 Kevin Dobie 4500 Park Glen Road, #300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Re: MTGLQ Investors, L-P. v. Donald Mashak, Provident Bank, John Doe and Mary Roe Court File No.: 86-CV-18-1271 Mr. Mashak, Court Administration received your correspondence on July 18, 2022. 1 am retuming it, as it constitutes “ex parte” communication. Under Rule 2.9(A) of the Minnesota Code of Iudicial Conduct, a judge shall not permit, consider, or take any action on an ex parte communication. Rule 2.9(A) of the Minnesota Code of Judicial Conduct prohibits the Court from reading, reviewing, or taking action on any such party communication outside the presence of other parties and/or their counsel. Please be advised that simply eopying opposing counsel or the other party does not make it an acceptable form of communication with the Court, Rule 2.9(B) provides, in relevant part: “If'a judge inadvertently receives an unauthorized ex parte communication hearing upon the substance of the matter, ‘the communication should be noted as received and returned to the sender.” As such, the Court is ethically prohibited from commenting on your correspondence or acting upon any request therein. Sincerely, Law Clerk to the Honorable Catherine McPherson ce: Kevin Dobie: FileFrom 1.877.233.3839 Mon Ju1 18 15:14:40 2022 POT Page 2 of 6 STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF WRIGHT TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT MTGLQ, CASE TYPE: 14 OTHER CIVIL John and Jane Doe Corporations, & John and Jane Doe Appraisers & Mortgage Brokers Court Case No. 86-CV-18-1271 Plaintift FEN ¢ IN U F. ED u RESPONSE CORRESPONDENCE TO JUDGE MCPHERSON REGARDING ALLEGED Vs. Pl FF MTL R ING DISCOVERY AND. D FORA COURT SUPERVISED DISCOVERY CONFERENCE, ET.AL, Donald Mashak, The Provident Bank, John Doe, and Marie Roe, Filed in District Court Defendant(s). State of a Lated Enjoined Indispensable Parties: Goldman Sachs Group, nc, Federal National Mortgage Association, and Deutsche Bank (USA) NA, Residential Credit Soktions, inc, Fest Franklin Financial Services, Federal Reserve Bank Board of Govemors, John andlor Jane Doe Appraiser, John andlor Jane Doe Morigage Broker. ‘To: Glerk of Wiight County Courts, 763-682-7539 Fax: 763-682-7300, 3700 Braddock Ave, Room 1100 Bufido, MN 55313; Plaintiff MTLQ, Goldman Sachs Group, inc. Federal Natonai Mortgage Associaton (hereafter Fannie Mae", Deutsche Bank, NA, Residental Credit Sobuions (hereafter * RCS’) First Frankin Financial Services (hereafter “Fist Franklin’) via thei attorneys Liebo, Weingarden, Dobie & Barbie(LWDB), PLLP 952-925-6889 fax 952.925-5879 4500 Park Gien Road #300 Minneapoks MN 55416, The Provident Bank (hereafter Provident) at 201 East 5 Street, Cincinnati OH 45202 and Indkspensable party Federal Reserve Bank Board of Govemors, 20th Siret and Constitution Avenue N.W. Washington, D.C. 20561. TO: Judge Catherine McPherson via Fax 763-682-7300 this day, 18JUL2022 ‘Wright County Government Center $3700 Braddock Ave, Room 1100 Butfalo, MN 55313. Defendant Meshek anticipated he would be more fully able o respond as a follow up tos intial 121UL2022 response to Plaintiff's hugely misrepresentatve correspondence of 7JUL2022, regarding Discovery. This response about Discover ‘coming from Plaintiff § weeks after inquired to Plaintiff about same, and then only have additional correspondence by Defendant to the Court requesting the Courts intervention. Clearly, Plaintiff is delaying and not cooperating in Discovery. Defendant also asserted in his 12JUL2022 that Plaintft MTGLQ no longer has standing inthis mater, and Plant has Not yet redressed that issue. That said, Defendant Mashak had allocated this just past weekend and today, to create and publish said more elaborative response by 18JUL2022, However, a Discovery issue erupted with others | had served Subpoenas upon. Previously, one or more parties of these parties indicated they were retaining a lawyer. ysFrom 1.877.233.3839 Mon Jul 18 15:14:40 2022 POT Page 4 of 6 Itis clear, Defendant Mashak is working feverishly on discovery in this COMPLEX LITIGATION that goverment attorneys ‘should have performed and released to the public long ago. (2008 Bank and Real Estate Crisis, Wells Fargo Bank, NA. incorigible commissions of criminal conspiracies from the 1990s to 2018). CONCLUSION ‘As this 18JUL2022 was setimposed by Defendant Mashak, the Court shouid merely view this correspondence as a simple courtesy of extending the self-imposed deadline to 25JUL2022. It is of no adverse consequence to alleged Plaintif MTGLQ (who appears to no longer have standing) nor Provident Mashak (whose interests have been acquired bby the Superior Lien Halder along the way), nor the other Indefensible Parties, Those were my thoughts. Thank you for your time Respectfully submitted, in Liberty Bae: lL Don Mashak, 612-249-3299 07/18/2022 RL. 1 Box 231, Albertville, MN 65301 Defendant, As a Free Person and State National under the Organic Constitution of the United States of America 3/3From 1.877.233.3839 Mon Jul 18 15:14:40 2022 POT Page 3 of 6 ‘After a week of two passed, on Friday, 15JUL2022, Defendant Mashak sent said parties alter indicating he had heard from no lawyer and was iritated that they just sought to delay discovery Atcirca Zam, Saturday Moming 16JUL2022, Defendant Mashak received an email from a lawyer claiming to represent someone but Faiing fo mention by name the partes they were representing, With no names listed, Defendant Mashak ‘speculated this email was presumably responsive to Defendant Mashak’s, 1SJUL2022 email lo one or more of the parties he has served subpoenas upon, pointing oul no lawyer had contacted Defendant claiming to represent them. However, this circa 7am, 16UL2022 emai, made no reference to any prior email on BJUL2022, instead appearing to Be the first emai attempting o establish representation for some parlyies) said lawyer refused to idenfiy by name. (Only later, did said lawyer attempt to assert a prior email from him had been sent, Defendant Mashak was forced to spend several hours reviewing his email from 8JUL2022, before ‘Being sure he could confidently announce the representation of the 8JUL2022 email being ale. Many more hours were sentin email exchanges on Saturday, 16,UL2022, despite Defendant Mashak’s request that said lawyer not contact him forthe rest of the weekend and preferable, not until Tuesday 19JUL2022. Said Lawyer ignored my request and continued to drone on, seemingly embarrassed by his error and being caught in a lie. | asked the Lawyer to provide a nolice of representation withthe full legal names of the parties he claimed to represent. He refused. So unprofessional was this lawyer, that | asked for his BAR Number. He refused ‘Today | found yet another email from this lawyer, and was forced to spend hours fo respond, | have informed said lawyer, thal uniess and until he provided a Notice of Representation bearing the full legal names of al the partes he represents, | am going to treat al of those that! have served Subpoenas on as unrepresented. | not going tO rely on my speculation as to who he represents, as proof of representation may become important later inthis Wigation. ‘The point being the 3 days | alloted for a more exhaustive response to meet my settimposed 181UL2022 deadine, ‘Were bumt up by some lawyer who refuses to identily by name who he allegedly represents ‘And | must expend more time researching new information gained in from this lawyer's lirade, continuing my other litigation strategies and Enforcing my Subpoenas originally served 1JUN2022. For these reasons, | am extending my selfimposed deadline to 25JUL2025, unless the Court andlor the other parties object. Defendant Mashak only appears inthis fitgation because of legal and unconsbtutioal acts commited upon him in furtherance of Seditious Conspiracy, Conspiracy to Commit Treason, Conspiracies to Obstruct Justice and Conspiracies ‘Against hs Rights... and other criminal activites by one or more of those named in the Tile of hs litgation, or in ‘Subpoenas. ‘All American are saddened to know that our government has become @ domestic enemy and persons in our Government ‘and the Legal System view their loyaty to the Progressive Globalis Insurrection as of more importance than their sworn ‘oaths to supporl and defend the Constitution from al enemies, foreign and domestic. 28\agsa = NU. se OH (VTS ent prvo yeaa WT WET ra NOSMAHgOW aN LY) FIEVYONOH f “ess NIV SCCM RNINTY