Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assets
The total amount of assets has decreased Cash & Short Term Investments 61661 85419
compared to the year before and the total 11,54% 16,43%
amount in 2020 was 519,8 Billion SEK. Total Accounts Receivable 131110 24,53% 112776 21,69%
Compered to the year before it has decreased
15 billion SEK. The company regarding the Inventories 56644 10,60% 47625 9,16%
assets ahs not only decreased. Currency effects Other Current Assets 34296
from revaluation of assets resulted in and 32772 6,13% 6,60%
positive operating cash flow and was for the Total Current Assets 282187 52,79% 280116 53,88%
most part increased in the cash and cash
equivalents. 0,00% 0,00%
Net Property Plant & Equipment 96759 18,10% 87015 16,74%
In 2020, the Volvo Group Industrial business' Accumulated Depreciation 100058 18,72% 98890 19,02%
net financial assets (excluding post-employment
benefits and provision for lease liabilities) Total Investments and Advances 14282 2,67% 17933 3,45%
increased by SEK 12.1 billion to a net financial
asset position of SEK 74.7 billion as of 31 Long-Term Note Receivable 80036 14,97% 78872 15,17%
December 2020. The impact of positive Intangible Assets 36668 6,86% 34578 6,65%
operating cash flow of SEK 18.5 billion was
partially offset by dividends paid to non- Other Assets 1663 0,31% 1712 0,33%
controlling shareholders of SEK 800 million and
negative exchange rate movements of SEK 2.2 Total Assets 534532 100,00% 519879 100,00%
billion.
Balance sheet- Liabilities
Capital employed/invested
From 2017 to 2020 the working capital, financial Working Capital 223410 227806 200207 154953
debt and capital employed has been quite stably 58258 56136 48646 53771
Financial debt
growing in Volvo. This acquired growth in all three
years was also financed by financial debt, which Captal employed 206400 197813 174477 161573
explains the peaks in the according years. Turnover rates
The company also managed to pay its suppliers on
short notice, although this had to be relativized AR Turnover 3,00 3,29 3,21 3,08
because the company, as a service company with no
production, did not receive significant supplies. AR Days Outstanding 122 111 114 119
Growth 519879
534532
489811
500000
431654
The graph to the right shows the successive
growth Volvo´s did achieved during the 400000
period of 2017 to 2019 and the affect covid
had in 2019 to 2020.
Volvo's strategy of continuous growth and 300000 223410
the years of alternating growth and
integration are reflected in company figures. 227806
161573
Construction activity has also gradually 200207
200000
improved in most markets following the 206400 197813
spring closures. During the year, we 174477
continued to strengthen our market share 154953
position in China, the largest market in the 100000
58258 56136 48646
world, with very good growth during the 53771
year
0
2020 2019 2018 2017
49531
46832
50000
Volvo's solvency figures are shown on the right. Solvency 2020 2019 2018 2017
Volvo has shown fairly solid and steady positive
development, with a decline in financial debt-to- Financial leverage 0,72 0,73 0,74 0,75
equity and debt-to-capital ratios, as well as an Debt to equity ratio 2,51 2,77 2,89 3,00
increase in the multiples of interest earned since
Financial debt to equity ratio 0,39 0,40 0,39 0,50
2020. As mentioned, does the decline in debt-to-
equity ratios indicate Volvo's risk aversion as Debt to capital ratio 0,28 0,28 0,28 0,33
they prefer lower financial leverage as their
competitors. Volvo appears to be trying to Times inteest earned 20,60 29,78 20,91 16,46
reduce their risk, which can be seen in the
financial leverage and lower debt-to-equity ratio. Isuzu 2020 2019 2018 2017
Compared to its peers, Volvo remains solvent Solvency
and has the ability to survive in the long run. The
Financial leverage 0,47 0,48 0,47 0,49
small change from 2019 to 2020 can certainly be
explained by the company's need to rebuild after Debt to equity ratio 0,90 0,91 0,90 0,95
the pandemic. Although Volvo's solvency looks Daimler 2020 2019 2018
stable. The asset-liability ratio, asset-liability Solvency
ratio, financial liability ratio and financial
leverage ratio decreased slightly. Financial leverage 0,83 0,81 0,08
The two liquidity ratios on the right show that Current Ratio 1.38 1.37 1.21 1.09
Volvo's liquidity improved steadily and steadily
between 2017 and 2020. From 2017 to 2020, Quick Ratio 1.14 1.09 0.87 0.80
liquidity was stable and on an upward trend.
Even with the pandemic, the liquidity ratio has
continued to increase, which shows that Volvo Cash Ratio 0.42 0.30 0.24 0.20
has handled the outbreak well and is well
prepared. However, Securitas are still better and
healthier compared to their peers, but Isuzu's Isuzu
are better than Volvos. Even at this point, none Liquidity ratios 2020 2019 2018 2017
of them seem to have liquidity problems, but Current Ratio 1.86 1.78 1.72 1.72
Daimler is the worst by comparison. Quick Ratio 1.32 1.29 1.27 1.26
Daimler
Liquidity ratios 2020 2019 2018
Current Ratio 1.19 1.27 1.23
Quick Ratio 0.90 0.93 0.86
ROE-analysis
Taking into account the leverage formula, its
Volvo
return on assets and return on equity increased
relatively steadily during 2017-2019. In 2020
though we saw a decline. The increase in return
on equity was on the one hand due to a
decrease in the cost of debt and an increase in Leverage Formula
return on assets, while in 2020 the opposite
was true. On the other hand, however, the Return on assets 3,92% 6,89% 5,12% 4,78%
decline in the debt-to-equity ratio runs counter
to the two aforementioned factors. Volvo could Cost of Liabilities 0,36% 0,43% 0,46% 0,57%
achieve a higher return on equity by using more
debt to finance its business, using higher
financial leverage and being compensated for Liabilities/Equity 2,51 2,77 2,89 3,00
taking higher risks. However, these figures
suggest that there is some risk aversion, and Return on Equity 13,55% 25,76% 19,79% 19,00%
Volvo will not take greater financial risk. Given
the predictable changes in returns on assets
and the cost of liabilities, Volvo finances its
business by reducing debt, and its expected
returns are less likely to change.
ROA-analysis
Volvo 2020 2019 2018 2017
By utilizing the Sven-Erik Johansson Du Pont
Formula, it very well may be seen that the Operating Margin (EBIE) 20,60 29,78 20,91 16,46
expanding return on resources is mostly
brought about by an expansion in resource Asset turnover 65,10% 80,81% 79,79% 77,08%
turnover and this further discloses it because of
its lessening in 2020 where both decline.. Volvo Return on Assets 3,92% 6,89% 5,12% 4,78%
thusly figured out how to execute its gained
Isuzu 2020
resources and create benefit out of them. The
organization consequently has a Slower Operating Margin (EBIE) 51,223791
turnover of its abilities than its companions Asset turnover 96,65%
with Higher resource turnover. Likewise, on Return on Assets 3,77%
working benefit does Volvo create a lower EBIT
and monetary pay comparative with deals than Daimler 2020
both of its friends. This implies, that Volvo
Operating
utilizes its abilities more regrettable by offering
its types of assistance increasingly slow it Margin
produces a lesser edge, for example a lesser (EBIE) 0,704225
benefit for each help it gives than the two its Asset
rivals. All in all, Volvo's better yield on resources turnover 72,04%
is accomplished by offering types of assistance Return on Assets 0,29%
quicker. Notwithstanding, the pandemic might
have been an explanation this changes for the
peers.
Cash Flow Cash Flow (in MSEK)
Operating Activities
Net Income before Extraordinaries
2020
27484
2019
49531
2018
34478
2017
30326
Conclusion
12,00%
10,16%
9,73% 9,76%
10,00%
After analyzing Volvo's financials, it can be concluded
that the company achieved steady and solid growth
between 2017 and 2019, mainly due to acquisitions
and organic growth. The company has implemented 8,00%
a strategy of alternating growth and integration 7,17%
phases, thus ensuring a sound financial position in
terms of profitability, solvency and liquidity. As such,
the positive and stable trend is likely to continue. In 6,00%
the above three areas, Volvo has shown steady 5,28% 5,10%
development, and 2020 is better than its peers Isuzu 4,81%
and Daimler. Still, Volvo can only achieve a lower
return on equity, even though it outperforms both 3,91%
4,00% 5,32%
peers in terms of return on assets. Although in 2020,
peers have better ROA and ROE. The reason is 5,11% 4,99%
Volvo's lower debt-to-equity ratio, so it takes less risk 3,77%
by using less financial leverage and doesn't get as
2,00%
much compensation as its two rivals.
Shareholders more or less determine their level of
risk aversion and the returns they expect due to the
company's higher return on assets, compared to
0,00%
Daimler. Isuzu's return on assets is higher. Volvo 2020 2019 2018 2017
could improve tracking of customers, thereby
reducing the number of outstanding receivable days, ROE ROA Net profit-margin
although one has to take into account the different
credit days granted in countries other than Sweden.
However, by making improvements in this area, Volvo 2020 2019 2018 2017
Volvo can improve its operating cash inflow and real 2,51 2,77 2,89 3,00
Debt to equity ratio
liquidity, as real cash is always better than just
legitimate claims made to customers, which may not Quick Ratio 1,14 1,09 0,87 0,80
materialize in the worst-case scenario.