Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MODULE 1-2 P. Ed. 10
MODULE 1-2 P. Ed. 10
1. How would you apply your knowledge of the four pillars of education in your day-to-day
living? Cite concrete illustrations.
Answer: The four pillars of education are all significant to each other. It will be hard if
one is lacking since the rest will be affected. It is not only the parent who will be develop
these skills but the teacher must also help to achieve a Full development of individual.
On my own daily activities, the main purpose of these 4 pillars is to help us live and
become a better person who loves learning, putting it into action what we learned, brings
peace to everyone and live a life with good conscience who respects others as himself.
And participate in plans and projects, celebrating achievements with family and friends
and at work. The discovery of the other allows us to know each other better, because it
involves acting in the field of attitudes and values.
Learning to know
-is the foundation of the pillars of education. This starts at home and then school
knowing all the basic knowledge we need in order for us to master the learning tools.
Learning to do
-is applying what you have learned in the school. It will be easy for us to do what we have
learned in school after we have mastered, the developing of skills is being emphasized.
The pillars of education are very important as a future teacher because it is critical to
peace and mutual understanding to emphasized the value if education as a manifestation
of the spirit of unity. The system of live together as active members of a global village
and contribute to attainment of a culture of peace. Teacher must always remember that
these pillars of education are essential for them in guiding.
Post Activity:
Multiple Choice. Select the letter of your correct answer.
1. B
2. D
3. D
4. C
5. B
MODULE 2
Application:
Answer: An education for globalization should therefore nurture the higher order
cognitive and interpersonal skills required for problem finding, problem-solving,
articulating arguments, and deploying verifiable facts or artifacts. These skills
should be required of children and youth who will as adults, fully engage the
larger world and master its greatest challenges, transforming it for the betterment
of humanity regardless of national origin or cultural upbringing. Globalization has
become a widespread idea in national and international dialogue in recent years.
But what do we mean when we invoke each of these terms, and is there really a
meaningful distinction between the two. Globalization’s shifting and controversial
parameters make it difficult to describe it as clearly as a dominant force, both
positively and negatively, shaping the environment in which we live. Motivated by
economic forces and driven by digital technologies and communications,
globalization links individuals and institutions across the world with
unprecedented interconnection. In doing so, it, income ways, democratizes and
intensifies interdependence and in other ways creates new forms of local reaction
and self-definition. While it may spread certain freedoms, higher living standards,
and a sense of international relatedness, it also threatens the world with a
“universal” economy and culture rooted in the North American and Western ideals
and interests. Despite the ambiguities in the definition and significance, and the
anxieties and backlashes it generates, globalization will remain a dominant
paradigm for the foreseeable future. Global education, as distinct from
globalization, does what higher education has traditionally
aimed to do: extend students’ awareness of the world in which they live by
opening them to the diverse heritage of human thoughts and action, and
creativity. Global education places particular emphasis on the changes in
communication and relationships among people throughout the world
highlighting issues as human conflict, economic systems, human rights and
social justice, human commonality and diversity, literatures and cultures, and the
impact of the technological revolution. In seeking to understand and theorize the
nature of globalization and its effects in education, itis argued that globalization
has both potentially negative as well as potentially positive effects. It is also
argued that the restructuring of the state under the impact of neo-liberalism,
which has been the underpinning ideology of economic globalization, has had a
real effect upon the structures of education, as well as potentially positive effects.
It also argued that the restructuring of the state under the impact of neo-
liberalism, which has been the underpinning ideology of economic globalization,
has had a real
effect upon the structures of education, as well as upon educational policies in
the form of new managerialism and human capital theory.
THANK YOU
TEACHER 😊