Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT Low dietary intake of calcium also is associated with higher risks
Background: Adequate intakes of calcium are required for optimal of colon cancer and hypertension and may affect normal growth
bone health and protection against chronic disease. Dairy products in children (6, 7).
are an excellent source of calcium. Dairy products are an excellent source of bioavailable cal-
Objective: The absorption of calcium from a range of fortified milks cium. Food intake surveys indicate that milk and dairy products
was measured in humans with the use of stable isotopes. generally are the main source of dietary calcium, constituting
310 Am J Clin Nutr 2006;83:310 – 6. Printed in USA. © 2006 American Society for Nutrition
ABSORPTION OF CALCIUM FROM ENRICHED MILKS 311
TABLE 1
Composition of the semi-skimmed (1.9% fat) milk drinks used in the study1
Milk
reducing interactions between calcium and other minerals (19). one given orally and one intravenously. True fractional absorp-
Although in vitro and animal studies showed a positive effect of tion (FA) of calcium was calculated from the enrichment of both
CPPs on calcium absorption, the results from human studies were isotopes in urine samples by taking into account the amounts
TABLE 2 TABLE 3
Composition of the fructo-oligosaccharides (FOSs) supplemented in the Subject characteristics1
FOS milk used in the study1
Value
Value
Age (y) 28.7 앐 3.7 (24–26)
Carbohydrate content (% of DM) 쏜 99.5 BMI (kg/m2) 22.3 앐 1.7 (19.5–26)
FOS (% of DM) 쏜 95.0 Serum iPTH (pg/mL) 35.1 앐 8.2 (16.6–52.1)
GF2 (% of DM) 쏜 55.0 Serum 25(OH)D (nmol/L) 56.3 앐 9.3 (32.9–71.4)
GF3 (% of DM) 쏜 33.0 Energy intake (kcal/d) 2248 앐 344 (1522–2723)
GF4 (% of DM) 쏜 6.5 Protein intake (g/d) 81.4 앐 14.2 (53–112)
Glucose ѿ fructose ѿ sucrose (% of DM) 쏝 5.0 Fat intake (g/d) 92.0 앐 15.0 (62–135)
Dry matter (%) 72.0 Carbohydrate intake (g/d) 266.6 앐 41.7 (184–362)
Ash (% wt:wt) 쏝 0.1 Calcium intake (mg/d) 913.0 앐 189.0 (690–1287)
1
DM, dry matter; G, galactose; F, fructose. 1
All values are x 앐 SD; range in parentheses. n ҃ 15. iPTH, intact
parathyroid hormone; 25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Values were calcu-
lated from food-intake diaries.
90 CPP/L (DMV International, Veghel, Netherlands) consisting
of 89.1% protein (containing 22.5% CPP), 0.1% fat, 0.1% car-
bohydrates, 5.7% ash (60 mg Ca/100 g product), and 5% mois- urine samples were collected in acid-washed containers from day
ture, labeled with 42Ca as CaCl2 (CPP milk). 1 (24 h before the test day) to day 4. Then the subjects underwent
The milk drinks were labeled with 6 mg 42Ca the day before the a 2-wk wash-out phase before they began the next study period
absorption test and left overnight at 4 °C to allow for equilibra- as described above. Aliquots of urine were kept at Ҁ80 °C until
tion between the calcium label and the native milk calcium. The analysis was conducted.
Milk
MSS
Control Milk calcium (42Ca) TCP (44Ca) CON FOS CPP
% % % % %
x 앐 SD 24.5 앐 7.3 23.8 앐 7.4 27.5 앐 7.62 24.1 앐 6.0 25.6 앐 5.53 22.9 앐 5.8
CV 29.9 31.1 27.6 25.1 21.5 25.2
Range 14.9–37.4 16.3–37.9 13.5–40.4 15.4–34.8 16.3–35.6 12.9–32.7
1
n ҃ 15. Control, standard semi-skimmed milk; MSS milk, milk enriched with calcium from milk solids and tricalcium phosphate; CON, milk enriched
with calcium from concentrated milk; FOS, milk supplemented with fructo-oligosaccharides; CPP, milk supplemented with caseinophosphopeptides (CPPs).
2,3
Significantly different from the control milk (repeated-measures ANOVA and Tukey’s honestly significant difference post hoc test): 2P 쏝 0.01,
3
P ҃ 0.055.
was significantly higher (27.5 앐 7.6%; P ҃ 0.003) than that from dairy product with poor stability. The combination of calcium
the control milk (24.5 앐 7.3%), as shown in Table 4. Absorption salt and milk solids used for calcium fortification, instead of milk
of calcium from the FOS milk (25.6 앐 5.5%) and the control milk solids only, also reduced the protein content of the MSS milk by
was nearly significantly different but not statistically signifi- 10%. Reducing the milk protein content of the diet may reduce
cantly different (P ҃ 0.055). No differences in absorption of milk urinary calcium loss in humans, as shown in a study in which a
calcium were found between control milk and CPP milk. milk product with a higher calcium content and lower contents of
protein, phosphorus, and energy was compared with standard
milk (41). In our study, the percentage of calcium absorbed from
DISCUSSION standard milk or calcium-fortified milks, which contained 33%
Adequate calcium intake is critical to achieving optimal peak more calcium per volume unit, was the same. Although no ad-
bone mass, and it influences the rate of bone loss associated with vantage in terms of FA of calcium was observed, the intake of
aging. Food sources of calcium are recommended for optimal 30% less volume of the fortified milks with a meal led to absorp-
calcium intake (7) because they prevent mineral imbalance and tion of the same percentage of calcium.
also supply other nutrients that play a role in maintaining bone Previous reports showed that organic and inorganic calcium
health. Although dairy products, a naturally rich calcium source, salts, including TCP, calcium carbonate, and calcium citrate,
are the major source of highly bioavailable calcium in the diet, exhibit essentially the same FA when tested in humans, despite
fortification would provide significantly more calcium and having very different solubility in aqueous solutions, which sug-
therefore help consumers of these products achieve optimal cal- gests that the absorbability of calcium from food sources is af-
cium intake. However, the use of different calcium salts in for- fected mainly by other food components (42).
tified products should be evaluated in terms of calcium avail- The absorption of calcium from the TCP supplemented in the
ability. MSS milk was significantly higher (P ҃ 0.003) than that from the
The aim of the current study was to evaluate the absorption of milk itself. Most controlled trials in humans have shown no
35. Recker RR, Bammi A, Barger-Lux MJ, et al. Calcium absorbability from 42. Heaney RP, Recker RR, Weaver CM. Absorbability of calcium sources:
milk products, an imitation milk, and calcium carbonate. Am J Clin Nutr the limited role of solubility. Calcif Tissue Int 1990;46:300 – 4.
1988;47:93–5. 43. Kohls K. Calcium bioavailability from calcium fortified food products.
36. Couzy F, Kastenmayer P, Vigo M, et al. Calcium bioavailability from a J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo) 1991;37:319 –28.
calcium- and sulfate-rich mineral water, compared with milk, in young 44. Mortensen L, Charles P. Bioavailability of calcium supplements and the
adult women. Am J Clin Nutr 1995;62:1239 – 44. effect of Vitamin D: comparisons between milk, calcium carbonate, and
37. Weaver CM. Calcium bioavailability and its relation to osteoporosis. calcium carbonate plus vitamin D. Am J Clin Nutr 1996;63:354 –7.
Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1992;200:157– 60. 45. Martin BR, Weaver CM, Heaney RP, et al. Calcium absorption from
38. Heaney RP, Weaver CM, Fitzsimmons ML. Influence of calcium load on
three salts and CaSO(4)-fortified bread in premenopausal women. J
absorption fraction. J Bone Miner Res 1990;5:1135– 8.
Agric Food Chem 2002;50:3874 – 6.
39. Heaney RP, Dowell MS, Rafferty K. Bioavailability of the calcium in
fortified soy imitation milk, with some observations on method. Am J 46. Roberfroid MB, Van Loo JA, Gibson GR. The bifidogenic nature of
Clin Nutr 2000;71:1166 –9. chicory inulin and its hydrolysis products. J Nutr 1998;128:11–9.
40. Gueguen L, Pointillart A. The bioavailability of dietary calcium. J Am 47. Marx SP, Winkler S, Hartmeier W. Metabolization of beta-(2,6)-linked
Coll Nutr 2000;19(suppl):119S–36S. fructose-oligosaccharides by different bifidobacteria. FEMS Microbiol
41. van Beresteijn EC, Brussaard JH, van Schaik M. Relationship between Lett 2000;182:163–9.
the calcium-to-protein ratio in milk and the urinary calcium excretion in 48. Erba D, Ciappellano S, Testolin G. Effect of the ratio of casein phos-
healthy adults—a controlled crossover study. Am J Clin Nutr 1990;52: phopeptides to calcium (w/w) on passive calcium transport in the distal
142– 6. small intestine of rats. Nutrition 2002;18:743– 6.