You are on page 1of 6

| |

Received: 11 October 2020    Revised: 15 January 2021    Accepted: 16 January 2021

DOI: 10.1111/edt.12665

CASE REPORT

Multiple abnormalities in permanent incisors diagnosed six


years after a severe intrusive injury in the primary dentition: A
case report

Farah Chouchene  | Rihab Mabrouk  | Fatma Masmoudi | Ahlem Baaziz |


Fethi Maatouk | Hichem Ghedira

Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry


Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine Abstract
of Monastir, Laboratory of Biological,
Severe intrusion injuries of primary teeth are frequently associated with serious de-
Clinical and Dento-­Facial Approach,
University of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia velopmental disorders. This report describes the diagnostic procedures and the mul-
tidisciplinary approach for multiple sequelae to permanent incisors due to a severe
Correspondence
Farah Chouchene, Pediatric and intrusive injury of the primary maxillary anterior teeth at the age of 18 months in a
Preventive Dentistry Department, Faculty
7-­year-­old girl. Clinical examination revealed hypoplasia of tooth 22, and radiographic
of Dental Medicine of Monastir, Biological
Approach and Dento-­Facial Clinic examination showed crown-­root malformation of tooth 21, impaction of tooth 11,
Laboratory, Monastir, Tunisia.
and the presence of an odontoma-­like malformation on tooth 12. The affected tooth
Email: farah.pedo@gmail.com
12 had a poor prognosis, as highlighted by CBCT, and it was extracted. While for the
impacted 11, a surgical extraction followed by an orthodontic treatment is scheduled.
Aesthetic and functional problems were solved by a functional space maintainer using
a removable partial denture.
The occurrence of multiple abnormalities in permanent teeth as a result of intrusive
injuries in the primary dentition enhances the need for creating awareness among
dentists not only of the importance of appropriate immediate management of trauma
but also of the importance of establishing a long-­term follow up and subsequent man-
agement of any sequelae.

KEYWORDS
enamel hypoplasia, intrusion, odontoma-­like malformation, primary teeth, sequelae of trauma,
traumatic injuries

1  |  I NTRO D U C TI O N 30%.1-­5 Intrusion comprises 8-­54% of all luxation injuries of primary


anterior teeth.1,3,6
Trauma of the oral hard and soft tissues is very common in young Due to the close proximity of the developing permanent suc-
children.1 Epidemiological studies have reported that approximately cessor and the roots of the primary teeth, intrusion in the primary
one-­third of children and one-­quarter of adolescents and adults dentition may present a significant risk of sequelae in the permanent
have experienced dental trauma, and most of these injuries involved teeth.7
2
the upper central incisors. After a traumatic injury to the primary dentition, the sequelae
The reported prevalence of traumatic injuries in the primary den- in permanent teeth are closely related not only to the type of injury,
tition varies among different studies and ranges between 11% and but also to the severity of the injury, the age of the child at the time

© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

Dental Traumatology. 2021;00:1–6.  |


wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/edt     1
|
2      CHOUCHENE et al.

of the trauma, and any association with other factors such as alveo- that time. The parents reported also that the teeth re-­erupted seven
5,8-­10
lar bone fractures. months later but no dental follow up was arranged.
The sequelae could manifest as various pathological changes The patient had not been seen by any dentist until one year be-
such as hypoplasia (enamel discoloration and/or enamel defects), fore her visit to the Pediatric Dentistry Department.
crown dilaceration, root angulation or dilaceration, partial or com- An orthopantomogram taken one year before the day of con-
plete arrest of root formation, permanent tooth germ sequestration, sultation showed that the upper right lateral incisor (12) had a ra-
odontoma-­like malformation, and disturbances of eruption (ectopic diopaque tooth-­like tissue, tooth 11 was noted in a more cranial
or lack of re-­eruption).11-­13 These changes may cause different clin- position compared with its contralateral counterpart (tooth 21), and
ical problems such as malocclusions, dental problems, periodontal tooth 21 had an irregular crown morphology (Figure 2).
problems, and unaesthetic appearance which explain the need for A more recent orthopantomograph was requested and showed
multidisciplinary approach and long-­term follow ups. that the root formation of teeth 21 and 22 was almost completed.
This report describes the diagnostic procedures and the multi- An odontoma-­like malformation of tooth 12 and tooth 11 was
disciplinary approach for a seven-­year-­old girl with multiple abnor- horizontally displaced and impacted. However, it was not possible
malities of her permanent incisors following intrusion in the primary to exactly define the root apex on the conventional radiograph
dentition. (Figure 3).
A CBCT was then performed and showed marked proclination
and subocclusal position with anomalous crown morphology of
2  |  C A S E R E P O RT tooth 11 and an impacted radiopaque calcified mass resembling
an odontoma-­like malformation in place of tooth 12 (Figures 4
The present case report was prepared according to the CARE (CAse and 5).
REport) Guidelines.14 Since the child's major concern was being ridiculed at school
A 7-­year-­old female patient was referred to the Pediatric for her appearance, the initial management involved restoration of
Dentistry Department of the School of Dentistry of Monastir from the crown abnormality of the 22 with composite resin (3 M™ Filtek
a general dentist for investigation of unerupted maxillary incisors. Supreme XTE universal restorative), improvement of the esthetics,
The general dentist had initially referred the patient to a specialist pe-
diatric dentist 12 months prior. However due to the patient's family eco-
nomic status, presentation to a specialist pediatric dentist was delayed.
11
Written informed consent was provided by the child's father for 21
all examination and treatment procedures. 12
22
The medical history of the patient showed no specific problems
and the child was in good general health. Upon extra-­oral examina-
tion, no abnormalities were detected.
Intraoral examination showed a lack of teeth 12, 11, and 21 and
an erupted tooth 22 with a hypoplastic crown (Figure 1).
During the clinical interview, the parents reported that, at the
age of 18 months, the child had sustained a severe traumatic injury
to the primary maxillary anterior teeth after a fall from the stairs.
The parents could not recall all the details but confirmed that the
F I G U R E 2  Orthopantomograph showing abnormal morphology
anterior incisors were fully intruded (completely displaced into the in teeth #21, #22, #12, and impacted tooth #11
alveolar bone). No radiographic examination had been carried out at

(A) (B) (C)

F I G U R E 1  Intraoral views showing lack of teeth #12, #11, #21, and discolored tooth #22
CHOUCHENE et al. |
      3

and correction of functions, especially phonation and swallowing by Considering the poor prognosis of the affected tooth 12 which
making a functional space maintainer using a removable partial den- was highlighted by the CBCT, a treatment plan including its surgi-
ture (Figure 6). cal extraction was programmed, but the patient did not attend the
scheduled appointment.
The patient presented again, 12 months later, with tooth 21 now
11
21 erupted and presenting an irregular crown morphology. Surgical
22
extraction of tooth 12 under conscious sedation was performed.
The extracted tooth had multiple abnormalities, including enamel
12 hypoplasia, root dilaceration, and root duplication (Figure 7).
For tooth 21 with coronal abnormality, a coronal restoration
was considered in collaboration with the Prosthetic Department,
while for the impacted tooth 11, in collaboration with the
Department of Orthodontics, the following treatment plan was
considered: surgical extraction followed by orthodontic treatment
F I G U R E 3  Orthopantomograph showing impacted tooth #11
and evolution of the root formation of the teeth #21 and #22 to keep the space open until definitive prosthodontic treatments
can be performed.

F I G U R E 4  Multiplanar reformatted (MPR) and 3D image. Altered crown morphology in tooth 12 is seen in the coronal view (top left).
Palatal dilacerations of crown and aberrant pulp chamber are noted in tooth 11 in the sagittal view (top right). 3D images (bottom right) show
the position of tooth 11
|
4      CHOUCHENE et al.

F I G U R E 5  Multiplanar-­reformatted (MPR) and volume-­rendered (VR) image show impacted radiopaque calcified mass resembling
odontoma-­like malformation in place of tooth 12 (coronal view top right)

3  |  D I S C U S S I O N

The occurrence of developmental anomalies in permanent incisors


that can be attributed to injuries of their predecessors ranges from
12 to 74%.8,15-­17 Intrusive injuries are the most common and seri-
ous type of trauma in the primary dentition. These injuries require
a careful examination by the dentist not only of the damaged tooth,
but also monitoring for the possible sequelae of the permanent
tooth.11,18,19
According to previous guidelines, the treatment of intrusive in-
juries in the primary dentition depends mainly on determining the
relationship between the root(s) of the primary tooth and the tooth
germ of the permanent tooth. 20 More recent guidelines21 state that
the tooth should be allowed to spontaneously reposition itself, ir-
respective of the direction of displacement and regular clinical
and radiographic follow-­ups should be performed during the first
12 months after the trauma. Further follow-­up at 6 years of age is F I G U R E 6  Intraoral view after aesthetic rehabilitation of the
indicated for severe intrusion. patient
CHOUCHENE et al. |
      5

F I G U R E 7  A, the extracted tooth 12


(A) (B)
and B, the clinical appearance following
extraction

In the present case report, the lack of both regular follow-­up Clinical signs of an impacted tooth include asymmetric eruption of
and pre-­eruptive radiography complicated the management of this more than 6 months in relation to its homologue, retention of the pri-
patient. This emphasizes the importance of regular follow-­up ap- mary tooth, change in the chronology and sequence of normal erup-
pointments and pre-­eruptive radiography in the early detection and tion, mid-­line deviation, space closure, and elevation of the soft tissue
treatment of possible severe development disorders in the perma- of the palatal and labial mucosa.26-­28 Impaction and alteration in tooth
nent teeth. The importance of accurate examination and documen- morphology represent a clinical challenge with regard to diagnosis,
tation is evident in traumatic injuries, especially in children aged treatment planning, and prognosis. The treatment of this type of se-
between one and three years, and regular-­follow ups are particularly quelae may require the following: surgical, endodontic or aesthetic
20
recommended. procedures, and orthodontics with the need of specialists from dif-
The developmental disturbances are more severe and more fre- ferent fields of dentistry, resulting in lengthy treatment. Depending
quent when the traumatic injuries occur at younger ages (< 2 years old) on the degree of dilacerations and the localization of the tooth, dif-
due to the incomplete bone formation and permanent tooth mineral- ferent treatment options have been suggested in the literature.27
ization.9 This report describes multiple sequalae of permanent incisors In the present case report, a functional space maintainer using a
due to severe intrusive injuries of the maxillary anterior primary teeth removable partial prosthesis was provided and the patient was very
at a very young age (18 months). The rarity of this case can be under- satisfied with the prosthesis. Although the treatment was consid-
lined by the simultaneous occurrence of several types of severe dental ered temporary, it has improved the aesthetics and the psychologi-
anomalies in the same dental arch, after the same traumatic episode. cal outlook of the child, increased her self-­confidence, and corrected
As a result of traumatic injury to the primary dentition, the de- her speech, chewing, and swallowing.
velopment of an odontoma usually occurs at a very young age when In many cases, the sequelae in permanent teeth resulting from
the maxillary bone height is small. 22 These malformations should traumatic injuries need a multidisciplinary clinical approach and de-
be removed surgically at a suitable time. 23 In the present case, the layed treatment will require more complex interventions. Prompt
malformation was detected 6 years after the trauma. However, its treatment planning and early diagnosis can lead to successful out-
extraction was delayed due to the patient's conditions. Other possi- comes, and dentists play an important role in educating patients and
ble outcomes following traumatic injuries to their predecessors are parents regarding traumatic injuries and their sequelae. 29,30
the eruption failure or delay, ectopic eruption, or impaction of the
permanent teeth.15,16,24 AC K N OW L E D G M E N T S
These disturbances may result from the physical displacement of The patient management has been carried out at the Pediatric
the permanent tooth germ, the abnormal changes that might occur and Preventive Dentistry Department at the Faculty of Dental
in the connective tissue and the lack of eruption guidance from the Medicine of Monastir. The authors report no declarations of
prematurely lost primary incisor.15 In the current case, not only an interest.
odontoma-­like malformation of tooth 12 occurred, but tooth 11 also
had delayed eruption due to its impaction. C O N FL I C T O F I N T E R E S T
Such situations generally imply the need for advanced imaging None of the authors has declared any conflict of interest or financial
techniques rather than conventional radiographs. Imaging modali- disclosures.
ties such as CBCT can result in better diagnosis and more efficient
management of complex malformations. 2 Three-­dimensional images ORCID
enable analysis of the precise location and orientation of the im- Farah Chouchene  https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0256-913X
pacted tooth. 26 Rihab Mabrouk  https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8989-3498
|
6      CHOUCHENE et al.

18. Kargul B, Çağlar E, Tanboga I. Dental trauma in Turkish children.


REFERENCES İstanbul. Dent Traumatol. 2003;19:72–­5.
1. Gupta M. Intrusive luxation in primary teeth –­Review of literature 19. Gondim JO, Moreira Neto JJS. Evaluation of intruded primary inci-
and report of a case. Saudi Dent J. 2011;23:167–­76. sors. Dent Traumatol. 2005;21:131–­3.
2. Lam R. Epidemiology and outcomes of traumatic dental injuries: a 20. Gomes AC, Messias LP, Delbem AC, Cunha RF. Developmental dis-
review of the literature. Aust Dent J. 2016;61:4–­20. turbance of an unerupted permanent incisor due to trauma to its
3. Andreasen JO, Ravn JJ. Epidemiology of traumatic dental injuries to predecessor. J Can Dent Assoc. 2010;76:a57.
primary and permanent teeth in a Danish population sample. Int J 21. Day P, Flores MT, O’Connell A, et al. International Association of
Oral Surg. 1972;1:235–­9. Dental Traumatology guidelines for the management of traumatic
4. Zadik D. A survey of traumatized primary anterior teeth in dental injuries: 3. Injuries in the Primary Dentition. Dent Traumatol.
Jerusalem preschool children. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2020;36:343–­59.
1976;4:149–­51. 22. Shaked I, Peretz B, Ashkenazi M. Development of odontoma-­like
5. Von Arx T. Developmental disturbances of permanent teeth follow- malformation in the permanent dentition caused by intrusion of
ing trauma to the primary dentition. Aust Dent J. 1993;38:1–­10. primary incisor –­a case report. Dent Traumatol. 2008;24:395–­7.
6. Robertson A, Lundgren T, Andreasen JO, Dietz W, Hoyer I, Norén 23. Andreasen JO, Flores MT, Lauridsen E. Injuries to developing
JG. Pulp calcifications in traumatized primary incisors a morpholog- teeth. In: Andreasen JO, Andreasen FM, Andersson L, editors.
ical and inductive analysis study. Eur J Oral Sci. 1997;105:196–­206. Textbook and color atlas of traumatic injuries to the teeth, 5th edn.
7. Costa V, da Silva-­Júnior I, Shqair A, Gastmann A, de Baldissera EFZ, Copenhagen, Denmark: Wiley Blackwell; 2019:589–­625.
Goettems M, et al. Fusion of permanent teeth as post-­traumatic 24. Brin I, Ben-­Bassat Y, Zilberman Y, Fuks A. Effect of trauma to the
sequelae of trauma in primary dentition: a case report with fifteen primary incisors on the alignment of their permanent successors in
years of follow-­up. J Clin Exp Dent. 2018;10:709–­12. Israelis. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1988;16:104–­8.
8. Andreasen JO, Sundström B, Ravn JJ. The effect of traumatic inju- 25. Mahesh R, Kanimozhi IG, Sivakunar M. Dilaceration and eruption
ries to primary teeth on their permanent successors. I. A clinical and disturbances in permanent teeth: A sequelae of trauma to their
histologic study of 117 injured permanent teeth. Scand J Dent Res. Predecessors-­diagnosis and treatment using cone beam CT. J Clin
1971;79:219–­83. Diagn Res. 2014;8:10–­2.
9. Lenzi MM, Alexandria AK, Ferreira DMTP, Maia LC. Does trauma in 26. Paoloni V, Pavoni C, Mucedero M, Bollero P, Laganà G, Cozza P.
the primary dentition cause sequelae in permanent successors? A Post-­traumatic impaction of maxillary incisors: diagnosis and treat-
systematic review. Dent Traumatol. 2015;31:79–­88. ment. Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2013;4:174–­83.
10. Diab M, elBadrawy HE. Intrusion injuries of primary incisors. 27. Kuvvetli SS, Seymen F, Gencay K. Management of an unerupted
Part III: Effects on the permanent successors. Quintessence Int. dilacerated maxillary central incisor: a case report. Dent Traumatol.
2000;31:377–­8 4. 2007;23:257–­61.
11. Altun C, Cehreli ZC, Güven G, Acikel C. Traumatic intrusion of pri- 28. Valladares Neto J, de Pinho CS, Estrela C. Orthodontic-­surgical-­
mary teeth and its effects on the permanent successors: a clini- endodontic management of unerupted maxillary central incisor
cal follow-­up study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol with distoangular root dilaceration. J Endod. 2010;36:755–­9.
Endodontology. 2009;107:493–­8. 29. Antero S, Monteiro A, Campos V, Lenzi M. Odontoma-­like malfor-
12. Caprioglio A, Salone GS, Mangano C, Caprioglio C, Caprioglio D. mation in permanent dentition due to severe trauma in deciduous
Intrusive luxation of primary upper incisors and sequelae on per- dentition-­c ase report. Rio de Janeiro Dental Journal. 2010;2:31–­5.
manent successors: a clinical follow-­up study. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 3 0. Bansal AV, Bansal A, Kulkarmi VK, Thomas B, Dhar RS.
2014;15:101–­6. Multidisciplinary management of an unusual case of multiple de-
13. Bastone EB, Freer TJ, McNamara JR. Epidemiology of dental velopmental defects in lateral incisor followed by intrusive injury to
trauma: a review of the literature. Aust Dent J. 2000;45:2–­9. primary incisors. Contemp Clin Dent. 2012;3:510–­3.
14. CARE Case Report Guidelines. CARE Case Report Guidelines.
Available from: https://www.care-­statement.org.
15. Güngör HC, Püşman E, Uysal S. Eruption delay and sequelae in per-
How to cite this article: Chouchene F, Mabrouk R, Masmoudi F,
manent incisors following intrusive luxation in primary dentition: a
case report. Dent Traumatol. 2011;27:156–­8. Baaziz A, Maatouk F, Ghedira H. Multiple abnormalities in
16. Brin I, Fuks A, Ben-­Bassat Y, Zilberman Y. Trauma to the primary permanent incisors diagnosed six years after a severe intrusive
incisors and its effect on the permanent successors. Pediatr Dent. injury in the primary dentition: A case report. Dental
1984;6:78–­82.
Traumatology. 2021;00:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12665
17. Ben Bassat Y, Fuks A, Brin I, Zilberman Y. Effect of trauma to the
primary incisors on permanent successors in different develop-
mental stages. Pediatr Dent. 1985;7:37–­4 0.

You might also like