Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction: The Optical Coherence Tomography is widely used in ophthalmic imaging to assess the condition
of retina. It serves as an effective tool in diagnosing various fluid related abnormalities in retina, which are prior
stages to vision loss. The overall pattern of fluid collection is a vital tool in disease identification. Aim: To classify
various fluid filled retinal abnormalities, like, Cystoid Macular Edema (CME), Choroidal Neo Vascular Membrane
(CNVM), and Macular Hole (MH) based on various features. Materials and Methods: A total of 114 images
were acquired using TOPCONN and ZEISS OCT devices. The obtained images were converted to grayscale
and subjected to pre-processing technique. Homomorphic Wiener filter was used to remove the speckle noises.
The Region of Interest was then identified by basic edge detection algorithm, for which, various features were
extracted and utilised for classification. Outputs were cross verified with a medical expert and the performance
of the proposed system was evaluated. Results: Based on the proposed system of classification of various fluid
filled retinal disorders, the input image was classified as Class 0—Normal, Class 1—CME, Class 2—CNVM, and
Class 3—MH based on the pattern of fluid accumulation. The overall performance was compared and evaluated
and it was identified that the system exhibited 91.65% accuracy, 90.36% Sensitivity, 92.95% Specificity and
Youden’s Index value of 0.83. Conclusion: As OCT serves an important tool for pre-screening of blindness,
automations in these areas remains of higher potential. The classification is based on the features used, which
showed a significant difference between the various classes as classified. The overall performance seems to
be satisfactory and would thus help in early detection of fluid related abnormalities and also can be used as an
expert tool to analyse the efficiency of the therapies.
566 J. Med. Imaging Health Inf. Vol. 10, No. 3, 2020 2156-7018/2020/10/566/006 doi:10.1166/jmihi.2020.2980
J. Med. Imaging Health Inf. 10, 566–571, 2020 RESEARCH ARTICLE
range of abnormality conditions. With reference to the works and Homomorphic Wavelet filters were implemented [10] for
of Kafieh et al. [11] and Miri et al. [12], the developed sys- this purpose and their efficiencies were evaluated using various
tem restricted itself only to segmentation and was not further parameters like SNR and PSNR. After preprocessing the areas
extended for classification for a huge dataset. Few systems devel- of interest (fluid filled retinal layers) was highlighted by basic
oped by Agrawal et al. [13] and Achariya et al. [14] restricted segmentation algorithm, say, sobel edge detection algorithm. The
towards metric estimations and was not developed as a classi- sobel edge detector proved sufficient enough to highlight the reti-
fier to provide an expert comment on the presented input image. nal volume. This operator is technically a differentiation operator
The various tools and techniques used by the proposed system for discrete data and computes the approximation of the gradi-
are described in the future section and drawn with the conclu- ent function of the input image. The Sobel operator could be
sion based on implementation of the same. The novelty of the defined as:
proposed research work is that it focuses on a wider range of −1 0 +1 −1 −2 −1
abnormalities and had also been evaluated for a comparatively
higher dataset thereby promising the stringent evaluation of the Gx = −2 0 +2 Gy = 0 0 0
proposed system performance and efficiency. −1 0 +1 +1 +2 +1
G = Gx 2 + Gy 2
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
The proposed image processing algorithm implements the pre-
2.2. Features and Classifier
processing, segmentation, features optimisation and classification
of the ophthalmic retinal images obtained from the OCT Devices. From the segmented images, those of specific abnormalities were
The overall process is described in Figure 1. identified for their common features. Various features that have
been used in the proposed system include zernike moments,
Various steps of the algorithm are explained in this section.
bulkiness, compactness and convexity. The features like bulki-
The proposed system was evaluated with a total of 114 images,
ness, compactness and convexity identified the fluid filled volume
which were acquired using TOPCONN and ZEISS OCT devices
that could be used as a vital feature for classification. Zernike
during March 2018. The images were obtained from various
moments of second order were used, as these moments were bet-
patients affected by CME, CNVM and MH with different age
ter shape descriptors and were more suggestible for supervised
groups with their personal data being confidential with approval
classification algorithms. The Zernike polynomials are given by,
from the institution.
the following equations:
2.1. Preprocessing and Segmentation G = am n Znm + bm n Zn−m
Preprocessing is the step that makes the raw input image eli- m n
gible for further processing. The images acquired from the where the coefficients are calculated as:
OCT devices utilises ultrasound as the source of imaging.
As known, the ultrasound based imaging modalities are suscep- F G = F G dd
tible to speckle noises and hence a speckle filter is mandatory
to optimally remove the speckle noises by pertaining the image 2n + 2
am n = G Znm
information. Various filters like Mean, Adaptive Smoothing, m
567
RESEARCH ARTICLE J. Med. Imaging Health Inf. 10, 566–571, 2020
The system overall efficiency was evaluated using Youden’s various parameters like SNR and PSNR, whose average values
index, which is a measure of diagnostic accuracy. It evaluated are represented in Figures 2(a) and (b).
the overall ability of discrimination for any diagnostic proce- It could be understood from the above results that Homo-
dure [10]. Youden’s index (YI) was deduced by deducting 1 morphic Wiener filters are ideal for our application. The sam-
from the sum of test’s sensitivity and specificity [11], YI = ple graylevel input image and filtered images are shown in
(sensitivity + specificity) − 1. For a test with poor ability of diag- Figures 3(a) and (b). It could be understood that the speckle
nosis, Youden’s index value equals 0, and for a perfect test noises that are generated by the source of ultrasound are signifi-
Youden’s index equals 1. cantly reduced with optimized edge preservation as shown in the
images.
(a) (b)
Fig. 2. (a) SNR of preprocessing filters, (b) PSNR of preprocessing filters.
(a) (b)
Fig. 3. (a) Input gray image, (b) homomorphic wiener filtered image.
568
J. Med. Imaging Health Inf. 10, 566–571, 2020 RESEARCH ARTICLE
(a) (e)
(b) (f)
(c) (g)
(d) (h)
Fig. 4. (a) Normal input image, (b) CME input image, (c) CNVM input image, (d) MH input image, (e) normal segmented image, (f) CME segmented image,
(g) CNVM segmented image, (h) MH segmented image.
Few I.features
Table likeand
Minimum zernike moments
maximum (M1
values of and extracted.
features M2), and bulki- ness express some notable differences for various abnormalities,
whereas compactness and convexity was not so efficient as a
Class Zernike M1 Zernike M2 Bulkiness Compactness Convexity
feature that would be used for classification. The minimum and
Normal 144048 181844 474445 544952 0784913
145719 183266 557237 631129 0799744
maximum values of the samples evaluated for various abnormal-
MH 544148 134054 27520 1360133 0511427 ities used for training are tabulated in Table I.
573641 145046 44272 148144 0531051
CNVM 421747 112947 375654 384652 0972651
From Table I, it is clearly understandable that the zernike
488738 129495 393409 693773 108419 moments, M1 or M2 are sufficing to proceed with further clas-
CME 131296 0932434 22166 635546 0812045
193525 155279 310024 643805 0997265
sification. Taking this into consideration, in order to optimise
the time taken for processing, we ignore the other features and
569
RESEARCH ARTICLE J. Med. Imaging Health Inf. 10, 566–571, 2020
evaluate our system performance by taking only Zernike moment an additional software for instantaneous evaluation of the retinal
M1 into consideration for classification. disorders and the therapeutic efficiencies.
570
J. Med. Imaging Health Inf. 10, 566–571, 2020 RESEARCH ARTICLE
approach. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 34(9), pp.1854– segmentation. International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer and
1866. Communication Engineering, 1(2), pp.185–189.
13. Agrawal, P. and Karule, P.T., 2014. Measurement of Retinal Thickness for 15. Ana Maria, 2009. Measures of diagnostic accuracy: Basic definitions: The
Detection of Glaucoma. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and
on Green Computing, Communication and Electrical Engineering, ICGCCEE Laboratory Medicine, 19(4), pp.203–211.
2014. 16. Venkatraman, K. and Sumathi, M., 2014. Review of optical coherence tomog-
14. Achariya, P.P., Sinha, A., Sarkar, S., Dey, S. and Ghosh, S., 2013. A new raphy image analysis for retinal disorders. International Journal of Pharmacy
approach of watershed algorithm using distance transform applied to image and Technology, 6(2), pp.2967–2980.
571