Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Hoard of Dirhams Found at Nippur 1978
A Hoard of Dirhams Found at Nippur 1978
EXCAVATIONS AT NIPPUR
TWELFTH SEASON
By
Michael L. Bates
5) al-Küfa, in western Iraq. This city was an important mint for dirhams
from 132 to 147 (750-64), after which dirhams were struck there only occa-
sionally. It cannot have been coincidental that the new mint, Madinat al-
Salam, began striking in 146/763. Five Küfan dirhams were in the hoard.
7) Wäsit. This city in south-central Iraq between Baghdad and al-Basra was
a major dirham mint from the time of its foundation in 84/703. In the eighth
Century Wäsit produced the bulk of the silver coinage of Iraq and the entire
East until the cAbbäsid conquest of the city in 133/750. It then virtually
ceased to emit silver coins. Seven Umayyad dirhams from Wäsit were in the
hoard.
8) Arminiya, the mint of the province Armenia, located at its capital Dabll.
Under the cAbbäsids, dirham production there was apparently only moderate and
was often interrupted for several years at a time. Only one dirham (pre-
viously unpublished) of this mint was in the hoard.
10) al-Rayy, a major city of Jibäl province very near modern Teheran. Dir-
hams were issued in this city under the Umayyads and °Abbäsids only intermit-
tently until 145/762, wheh the city became a major center of production. In
148/765 the mint name was changed to al-Muhammadiyya. In the hoard there was
one dirham with the mint name al-Rayy and sixteen with al-Muhammadiyya.
12) Madlnat Jayy (an older name for Isbahän in western Iran). This city was
a moderately important mint at intervals under the Umayyads and the cAbbäsids.
It is represented in the hoard by one coin.
128 EXCAVATIONS ÄT NIPPUR: TWELFTH SEASON
In summary, the hoard contained five dirhams from North Africa, twenty
from northern and western Iran, and fifty-one from Iraq. The proportionate
representation of the various mints is about what would be expected, taking
into account the factors of (1) the volume of production at the different
mints, (2) the distance of the mints from the findspot, and (3) the amount of
time that elapsed between the periods of major production of the mints and the
closure of the hoard. In the absence of die studies or comparative hoard re-
search, the volume of production at the various mints can be inferred only in
a general way from the numbers of specimens known today. Needless to say,
Chance also plays a large part in the representation of mints in a hoard.
The distribution of the coins of this hoard by date is remarkable in cer-
tain aspects, especially when considered along with the distribution by mints.
As would be expected, the earliest dates—those from 85 to 137—are scantily
represented, äs is usual. Coins of the last forty years represented in the
hoard make up 85.5 percent of the total. Assuming a generally steady volume
of production over the years, it is usually to be expected that a sample of
coins drawn from current circulation at any given moment will show a steady
increase from year to year, with the last few years comprising the largest
percentage of the sample. In this hoard, however, there is no such steady in-
crease. Instead there are marked fluctuations in the number of coins from
year to year, with a particularly sharp decline in the representation of coins
dating to the last decade.
Especially surprising is the total absence in the hoard of any dirhams
of the nearby and quite productive mint Madinat al-Saläm after 165/781-82 (one
coin of this mint found in the hoard may be äs late äs 166). The dirhams of
the last decade in the hoard come instead from the most distant mints: Ifriq-
iya (170, 177 H.), Wallla (174), Armlniya (175), and al-Muhammadiyya (168 [2],
170, 172, 173).
Two conclusions are suggested by this distribution: First, the date of
closure of the hoard (i.e., the date when the last coin was added to it) and
therefore the date of its burial and loss must be placed somewhat after the
latest date represented in it, 177/793. Although it is not impossible that
the dirham of Ifrlqiya of that year, äs well äs the other late coins of North
Africa in the hoard, were brought to Iraq in a single lot by a traveler in
the year 177, it is far more probable that these coins accumulated over a pe-
riod of perhaps five to fifteen years. It is safest to conclude that the
hoard was buried no earlier than the end of the eighth Century (after 184 H.).
Quite possibly the hoard was concealed and lost during the disturbances that
wracked Iraq from 196/812 to 200/815 äs a result of the dynastic war between
al-Amln and al-Ma'mün and the revolt of Abu'l-Saräyä in al-Küfa.
The second conclusion is that the contents of the hoard were evidently
not brought together within a short time span from the silver coinage in cir-
culation at the time that the hoard was concealed. If that had been the case,
Table 5
Distribution of Coins by Date
Number of Percentage
Years A. H. Coins* of Total*
85-137 11 14
138-142 2 3
143-147 7 9
148-152 7 9
153-157 17 22
158-162 11 14
163-167 12 16
168-172 5 7
173-177 4 5
,' ;-•,. . ' /' ' '. • . " '( Total 76 • 99 ' , , •
<*Three coins which can be dated only to a span of years overlapping the five-
year periods of the table have been assigned to the period that coincides
most nearly with their possible date span: Nos. 24 (141-47!H.)> 57•; (154-58
H.), and 19 (159-64 H.). The percentages total only 99 because of rounding.
130 EXCAVATIONS AT NIPPUR: 3WELFTH SEASON
the hoard would certainly have contained late coins from Madlnat al-Saläm and
other nearby mints. Rather, its contents must have been accumulated by its
owner over a period of time, whenever he found himself with a small surplus
that could be put aside. Possibly the fluctuations in the representation of
dates over the years reflect periods of relative prosperity and hardship.
Only one die identity exists in the hoard: The same obverse die was used
for two dirhams of Madlnat al-Saläm, 165 (nos. 66-67). The relative angle of
the obverse and reverse die axes was recorded in all cases. The eight Umayyad
dirhams are quite randomly aligned. Of the sixty-six 'Abbäsid reformed dir-
hams, 37, or 56 percent, have dies aligned either vertically or at a right
angle, while the remaining 29 are aligned at random. Roughly similar propor-
tions are found at each of the mints. There is no consistency in the angle
of alignment at any mint over any period of time.
A feature of about one-third of the coins in this hoard and also of many
other cAbbäsid dirhams of the eighth Century is the presence of linear inden-
tations on one or both faces of the coin. There may be one, two, or three
indentations; when there are more than one on one side, the indentations are
always parallel. This phenomenon has recently interested several scholars,
including- the late George Miles and myself; we had thought that the indenta-
tions were cut br stamped for some unknown purpose after the coins were made.
The obvious explanation was pointed out to me recently by Mr. Stephen Album:
The indentations on one face of the coin are simply traces of the horizontal
field inscriptions of the other side, äs can be seen by rotating a coin with
these indentations about its diameter. Evidently the elongated script of the
inscriptions, the thinness of the flans, and the great force applied in strik-
ing often caused the metal of the flan to be deformed into the incised in-
scriptions of the die, even though there is no projection on the opposite die
to press the metal into the incision. Such indentations occur in the hoard
on dirhams of mints from Wallla in the far west to al-Muhammadiyya in the
east, dated from 134 to 177. These indentations have not been noted in the
catalogue descriptions.
Although the weights of the coins have been noted in the catalogue they
are of no value for metrological study because every coin has been damaged to
some extent by corrosion or cleaning.
The catalogue description of the coins has been kept to a minimum: mint,
date, names of caliphs or officials appearing on the coin, weight, diameter,
and die axis (the arrow shows the relative angle of the die axis). Since
every coin is illustrated, the plates can be consulted for other details. At
least one previously published example of each issue in the hoard has been
cited. For the more common issues, only one or two references to the Standard
catalogues of major collections (British Museum, Paris, Berlin) have been pro-
vided. There is a list of abbreviated citations at the end of the catalogue.
The coins are listed by mints, in Arabic alphabetical order, and chrono-
logically within each mint listing. Dates or parts of dates in parentheses
are tentative readings; wherever possible, these have been confirmed by other
evidence. Dates and mint attributions in brackets are derived from comparison
with attributed examples known to the author. The coins have been numbered in
HOARD OF DIRHAMS 131
their catalogue Order; the italicized numbers in parentheses are those as-
signed in the preliminary inventory at the site. These latter numbers are to
be preceded in each case by the code 12 N 789, which in the inventory was as-
signed to the hoard äs a whole.
CATALOGUE OF THE COINS
4 (67). Ifriqiya, 177. Nasr (b. Habib; governor until Muharram 177). 2.5
g., 24 mm. •*• . Tiesenhausen 1231 (5 citations); cf. Berlin 972 (on which
coin the arrangement of the description implies, perhaps erroneously, that
bakh bakh appears above the reverse field; in any case these words are not
on the Nippur coin).
5 (42). al-Basra, 13(7?). 2.6 g., 24 mm. / . B.M. IX, p. 42 no. 33a;
Berlin 647. The digit of the date is somewhat dubious, but 137 is the only
year in which the annulet pattern of this coin (three annulet pairs alternat-
ing with three triplets) is so far known to occur.
7 (43). al-Basra, 142. 2.6 g., 24 mm. -»• . B.M. I, p. 42 no. 38.
8 (44). al-Basra, 146. Salam (b. Qutayba al-Bähili, governor 145-46). 2.1
g., 24 mm. •«- . ß.Af. I, p. 43 no. 42.
9 (47). al-Basra, 146. Anonymous. 2.6 g., 25 mm. -»• . B.M. I, p. 43 no. 43
annulets) and reverse configuration are found only on dirhams of this mint
in these years.
12 (49). al-Basra, 165. al-Khallfa al-Mahdl; Müsä Wall cAhd al-Muslimln (the
future al-Hädl). 2.5 g., 23 mm. + . B.M. I, p. 54 no. 98.
14 (51). al-Basra, 167. As no. 11, but Nasr (or Nusayr) below reverse field
(largely effaced on this coin, but cf. the published specimens). 2.7 g., 24
mm. x . Denizbaci 292; al-Qazzäz 1964, no. 23. Nasr, or Nusayr, who was
probably a local official, still unidentified, appears also on a copper coin
of this mint and year, Berlin 2136, Pl. VII.
18 (75). TPWRSTAN, 125 (Tabaristän Era, =160 H.). Säsänian type, with SaeId
(b. Daclaj, governor 160-63). 1.7 g., 21 mm. X . Walker, Arab-Sassanian,
p. 140 no. ANS. 19.
24 (57). al-Küfa, 14x [141-47]. 2.6 g., 24 mm. X. B.M. I, pp. 46-47,
nos. 61-66.
26 (29). al-Muhammadiyya, 149. As no. 25, except date. 2.8 g., 25 mm. -*• .
N.H.R. 51D.
134 EXCAVATIONS ÄT NIPPUR: TWELFTH SEASON
28 (35). al-Muhammadiyya/ 15(2). As no. 27, except date. 2.5 g., 25 mm.
X. N.H.R. 54A. (The visible portion of the digit of the date permits it
to be read äs either ihdä or ithnatayn, but the latter seems clearly prefer-
able; given the decade, no other readings are possible, äs this obverse an-
nulet pattern (four annulet pairs) and reverse configuration were used until
154 only.)
29 (30) . al-Muhammadiyya, 153. As no. 27, except date. 2.48 g., 23 mm. •*-.
N.H.R. 55.
33 (37). al-Muhammadiyya, 166. As no. 32, except date. 2.3 g., 24 mm. •»•.
N.H.R. 66A.
41 (2). M. al-Saläm, 152. 2.6 g., 25 mm. •> . B.M. I, p. 48 no. 72.
44 (5). M. al-Saläm, 154. 2.4 g., 24 mm. •*• . B.M. I, p. 48 no. 74.
55 (16). M. al-Saläm, 157. 2.5 g., 25 mm. -»• . B.M. I, p. 49 no. 77.
56 (17). M. al-Saläm, 158. 2.5 g., 24 mm. -> . B.M. I, p. 49 no. 79.
57 (74). [M. al-Saläm, 154-58]. As nos. 44-56. 1.3 g. (fragment, about 1/2
coin) , 24 mm. 4- . B.M. I, pp. 48-49, nos. 74-79.
60 (20). M. al-Saläm, 160. As no. 59, except date. 2.6 g., 24 mm. B. M.
I; p. 59 no. 124.
62 (23). M. al-Saläm, 161. As no. 59, except date. 2.6 g., 23 mm. x.
B.W. I, p. 59 no. 125.
63 (22). M. al-Saläm, 162. As no. 59, except date. 2.8 g., 24 mm. -*• .
B.M. I, p. 59 no. 126.
65 (24). M. al-Saläm, 164. As no. 59, except date. 2.75 g., 23 mm. V.
B.M. I, p. 60 no. 130.
69 (76). [Wäsit], 85. 1.4 g., 22 mm. *. Walker, p. 191 nos. 526-27. The
presence of the preposition fl and the epigraphical style make certain the at-
tribution to Wäsit and to the latter part of the year of issue.
70 (50). Wäsit, 96 (or 86?). 2.0 g., 22 mm. (clipped?) -> . Walker, pp.
193-94 nos. 541-42. (The decade ninety seems the better reading on stylistic
äs well äs epigraphical grounds.)
71 (59). Wäsit, 109. 2.4 g., 26 mm. + . Walker, p. 196 no. 557.
72 (60). Wäsit, 122. 2.8 g., 24 mm. X . Walker, p. 198 no. 573.
73 (52). Wäsit, 124. 2.4 g., 24 mm. * . Walker, p. 199 no. 576.
75 (62). Wäsit, 130. 2.9 g., 25 mm. / . Walker, p. 200 no. 585.
76 (63). Wallla, 174. CA1I (b. Abi Tälib, the fourth caliph); [Idrls b. cAbd J
Allah] (172-77, founder of the Idrisid dynasty; his name appears on his coins
in the reverse margin, which is missing on this coin) . 2.5 g., 25 mm. •*• ,
Eustache, p. 259 no. 373, pl. XXIII (there designated "in^dit," but an exactly
similar coin was published by Welin, p. 108 no. 1286, Fig. 8).
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
31 32 34 35
Fiö. 84.—Islamic coins, 12 N 789, from surface, west of WA. Scale, 1:1
38 39
41 42 45
46
Fiö. 85.—Islamic coins, 12 N 789, from surface, west of WA. Scale, 1:1
56 58 59 60
61 62 63 64
73 74 75
Fiö. 87.—Islamic coins, 12 N 789, from surface, west of WA. Scale, 1:1,