ASSIGNMENT FOUR

ANALISIS
KUANTITATIF

PUTU AYU KRISNA DEWI

NPM. 2132125045

PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER MANAJEMEN

PROGRAM PASCASARJANA
UNIVERSITAS WARMADEWA
DENPASAR
2022
Two-Way Anova, Interaction Effect and Post Hoc Analysis

1. One-Way Anova With Levels

a. Problem :
A researcher in the management science area want to study the effects of
an independent variable leadership style such (1) transformational
leadership (2) servant leadership and (3) transactional leadership upon a
dependent variable with two levels of employee performance such (1)
highly employee performance and (2) lowly employee performance.
Please, make your own data and analyze (1) the F-ratio, (2) the interaction
effect of the independent variable’s levels on the dependent variable’s
levels, and (3) post hoc analysis using the Tukey Test.

b. Data Description:
Leadership style provided by the an organization at Klungkung was
measured quantitatively to obtain interval data with the scale range 10-
100. Furthermore, the leadership categorized into three levels, namely (1)
transformational leadership, (2) servant leadership, and (3) transactional
leadership. The employee performance of an organization at Klungkung
was measured quantitatively to obtain interval data with the scale range
10-100. The employee performance was categorized into two levels ,
namely high, and low employee performance. Prior to data analysis, data
were tested for normality using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test and
homogeneity of variance using Levene’s Test. Data were analyzed using
parametric statistics, especially a two-way Anova with confidence interval
0.05. The following are the obtained data.
 Forms of Leadership
Transformational Servant Transactional
leadership leadership leadership
78 79 80
High Employee
79 80 81
Performance
80 81 82
81 82 83
82 83 84
83 84 85
Low Employee
84 85 86
Performance
85 86 87
86 87 88
87 88 89

c. Analysis

ANOVA

employee_performance

Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

Between Groups 6.167 11 .561 7.568 .000
Within Groups 1.333 18 .074
Total 7.500 29
 Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: Leadership Tukey HSD

Mean 95% Confidence Interval

Difference (I-
(I) leadership (J) leadership J) Std. Error Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Trans_L Servant_L -1.00 .707 .350 -2.77 .77

Transactional_L -2.00* .707 .024 -3.77 -.23
Servant_L Trans_L 1.00 .707 .350 -.77 2.77
Transactional_L -1.00 .707 .350 -2.77 .77
Transactional_L Trans_L 2.00 *
.707 .024 .23 3.77
Servant_L 1.00 .707 .350 -.77 2.77
Based on observed means.
The error term is Mean Square(Error) = 2.500.
*. The mean difference is significant at the ,05 level.

d. Interpretation
The results show, firstly the leadership style had simultaneous significant
effect on the employee performance of an organization at Klungkung
Regency (F = 7.568; df 11 and 18; alpha =0.000). Secondly, there is
significant interaction effect of leadership style at all levels on the
dependent variable except non-significant interaction effect servant
leadership-high employee performance (mean difference = -1.00; alpha =
0,707);

e. Conclusion and Suggestion

The leadership style had significant simultaneous effect on the employee
performance of an organization at Klungkung Regency. There are
significant interaction effect at all levels of the independent variable on the
dependent variable except non-significant interaction effect servant
leadership-high employee performance (mean difference = -1.00; alpha =
0,707);