You are on page 1of 1

NEWS & ANALYSIS MATERIALS NEWS

Shen and colleagues at the University estle​tt.​1c003​37). They also developed


of California, Riverside, and George electrospun nanofiber air filters with a
Electrospinning technology
controls spread of COVID‑19
Washington University have used elec- reduced pore size that can effectively
trospinning technology to synthesize capture viral aerosols. These electro-
nonwoven nanofibrous membranes spun filters comprise poly(vinylidene

S everal countries are beginning to


remove restrictions associated with
the COVID-19 pandemic due to low
for better filtration. One of the main
advantages of electrospinning is that
it operates under a strong electric field
fluoride) formed with an electrospinning
duration of 20 min and 30 min ­(PVDF20
and ­PDF30, respectively) and polyvi-
infection levels. Despite this, the spread and produces filters with long-lasting nylidene fluoride coated with a charged
of COVID-19 by airborne SARS- retained charges that can capture aero- polyelectrolyte such as poly(ethylamine)
CoV-2 remains a significant public sols through electrostatic attraction. ­(PVDF20/PEI) and poly(vinylphosphonic
health problem. It has been shown that Although electrospun nanofiber acid) ­(PVDF20/PVPA).
virus-laden aerosols < 5 μm in size can membranes have shown excellent per- Electrospun PVDF air filters have
become airborne for prolonged peri- formance in removing aerosols gener- smaller fiber diameters (0.2–1.3 μm) and
ods, accumulate in a closed environ- ated from polystyrene beads, NaCl, and pore sizes than commercial face masks.
ment, and remain infectious. Although bacteria, the research group used coro- A surgical mask has a fiber diameter of
the use of face masks has reduced the navirus aerosols to challenge their air fil- 5.7 μm ±  2.8 μm while the neck gaiter
spread of the virus, fabric masks do ters and face masks and evaluated their showed a fiber diameter of 12.0 μm ± 
not always have satisfactory aerosol efficiency, as reported in a recent issue 1.0 μm. A larger fiber diameter corre-
removal efficiency, droplet repellency, of Environmental Science & Technol- sponded to a larger pore size, indicating
and/or breathability. Researchers Yun ogy Letters (https://​doi.​org/​10.​1021/​acs.​ that electrospun filters have a higher filtra-
tion efficiency for airborne particles than
commercial face masks.
The electrospun filters have an aver-
99.995
age filtration efficiency of ≥ 95.7%,
98.8
100

90
99.1 99.9 99.1
95.7
98.2 while the commercial face masks have
Filtration Efficiency (%)

90.3
92.8
89.7
average filtration efficiencies of 44.9%,
80
confirming that the aerosol removal effi-
70 ciency increased with the decrease in
Electrospun
60 Air Filters
73.3 the mask pore size. The research team
also demonstrated that an increase in the
50 54.0
electrospinning duration and thickness
40 44.9 of the air filters enhanced coronavirus
Commercial
30 Murine hepatitis virus (MHV) aerosols
aerosol removal (99.9% and 99.1% for
NaCl aerosols Face Masks 31.6
20 Max and min ­PVDF30 and ­PVDF20, respectively). The
use of a polyelectrolyte coating did not
10
promote removing coronavirus aerosols,
PVDF20 PVDF30 PVDF20/PEI PVDF20/PVPA Surgical Cotton Neck gaiter
mask mask
and the average filtration efficiencies for
­PVDF20/PEI and P ­ VDF20/PVPA were
Aerosol filtration efficiency of electrospun air filters and commercial face masks. Aerosols
generated from a coronavirus (MHV-A59) and NaCl were used for the tests. Credit: Environ-
99.1% and 95.7%, respectively.
mental Science & Technology Letters.  J. Arnaldo Méndez-Román

Vol.:(0123456789)

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to the Materials Research Society 2021 MRS BULLETIN • VOLUME 46 • AUGUST 2021 • mrs.org/bulletin 1

You might also like