This document compares the accuracy of three numerical methods for approximating the solution to the differential equation X'=X: point collocation (Xpcm), sub-domain (Xsdm), and Galerkin's method (Xgal). It shows the computed solution and error at times from 0 to 1 using each method. On average, point collocation had the highest error (Avg Epcm = 0.1299), sub-domain method had slightly less error (Avg Esdm = 0.1270), and Galerkin's method had slightly more error than sub-domain (Avg Egal = 0.1292).
This document compares the accuracy of three numerical methods for approximating the solution to the differential equation X'=X: point collocation (Xpcm), sub-domain (Xsdm), and Galerkin's method (Xgal). It shows the computed solution and error at times from 0 to 1 using each method. On average, point collocation had the highest error (Avg Epcm = 0.1299), sub-domain method had slightly less error (Avg Esdm = 0.1270), and Galerkin's method had slightly more error than sub-domain (Avg Egal = 0.1292).
This document compares the accuracy of three numerical methods for approximating the solution to the differential equation X'=X: point collocation (Xpcm), sub-domain (Xsdm), and Galerkin's method (Xgal). It shows the computed solution and error at times from 0 to 1 using each method. On average, point collocation had the highest error (Avg Epcm = 0.1299), sub-domain method had slightly less error (Avg Esdm = 0.1270), and Galerkin's method had slightly more error than sub-domain (Avg Egal = 0.1292).