ASSESSMENT CRITERIA FOR THESIS PROPOSAL

Title: PHARMACY GRADUATES OF PHINMA-UNIVERSITY OF

PANGASINAN BATCH 2019: A TRACER STUDY

GRADING CRITERIA FOR PROPOSAL MAXIMUM POINTS

POINTS OBTAINED
1. Completeness and clarity
1.1. Are the problems and objectives of the study clear? 5
1.2. Is the background of the study sufficiently elaborated? 5
1.3. Are the research design and methods appropriate and 5
adequate?
2. Thoroughness of literature review and cross references
2.1. Are the problem and objective/s of the study emanating 5
from a thorough consideration of previous studies?
2.2. Does the proposed study make connections with, build on, 5
or comment on concerns raised by other researches?
2.3. Is the proposal well referenced, with all or most of its 5
literature coming from research journals?
3. Scholarly significance
3.1. Do the study’s objective/s and problem/s address 5
significant/current concerns in the discipline/field?
3.2. Does it contribute to the stock of knowledge in the field – 10
e.g., raise new questions and hypothesis; apply a novel
design/method or a new combination thereof; call attention
to new variables or posit new relationships between/among
existing variables; bring about new data or interpretation;
or question, negate, affirm, augment and revise an existing
theory, concept, conclusion, or design/method?
4. Others
4.1. Is the proposal well-written and free from writing errors? 5
TOTAL 50

● Use the back page for additional comments

Evaluation Guide
Score range Descriptive value
44-50 Very good
37-43 Good
31-36 Fair
30 below Poor

Panel Member (Signature over Printed Name)

Leader: BIALA, ALYSSA MARIE P.
Members:
● DELA CRUZ, JADE DOMINEE G.
● FRIAS, MIKAELA M.
● MAGALONG, CHARINA LEANN T.
● PIDLAOAN, MA. CATHERINE O.
● QUIDEZ, ALLESANDRA GAIL V.
● VERA, KHRISTINE JOY R.