Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a
trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more
information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/
terms
Shri Ram Center for Industrial Relations and Human Resources is collaborating with JSTOR to
digitize, preserve and extend access to Indian Journal of Industrial Relations
594 The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 51, No. 4, April 2016
have shown that OCB is positively ising research avenue. From the research on pro-
related to a variety of organizational social behaviors, it is evident that people who indulge
effectiveness measures (including in pro-social behaviors experience positive affect
production quantity, efficiency, (Penner et al., 2005), less burnout (Grant & Campbell,
profitability, and reduction of costs). At 2007), good psychological health (Penner et al., 2005),
unit/group level, OCB is negatively and relatedness need satisfaction (Weinstein & Ryan,
related to unit-level turnover (eg, Sun, 2010). As OCB is a specific form of pro-social behavior,
Aryee & Law, 2007; Podsakoff et al., we expect similar relationships between OCB and
2009), and positively related to unit aforesaid individual-level outcomes.
sales (eg, Podsakoff et al., 2009) and
customer satisfaction (eg, Yen &
Niehoff, 2004; Podsakoff et al., 2009).
At the individual level of analysis, OCB-
like behaviors are positively related to Organizational Citizenship
performance evaluations (eg, Allen & Behavior (OCB)
Rush, 1998; Podsakoff et al., 2009) and reward recommendation decisions
(eg, Allen & Rush, 1998; Johnson, Organ (1997) defined OCB as "the
Erez, Kiker, & Motowidlo, 2002); and contribution to the maintenance and en-
negatively
psychological -related to turnover intentions (eg, hancement
Chen, Hui &ofSego, the social
1998;and
Coyne & Ong, 2007). cal context that supports
Organ ettask al. (2006)
performance
emphasized
". Further,
the
discretionary nature of It is evident from
themostly
"discretionary con- that scholars have past research
focused OCB on thebytributions
defining that
it as
managerial interest. Possi- scription andgothatbeyond
do notthe laystrict
claim outcomes
to con- bly,of the
only individual-level
the actor's perspective is turnover contractual reward from the outcome
formalthat takes
reward
system". Since the early
Otherwise, the outcomes of OCB for the doer/actor have been ig- Organ and work of intentions.
colleagues, the domain of citizenship behavior
recent times,
has grownan increasing
at an impres-
bodynored.
of In
rate and it has been categorized in several
research
ways.on One pro-social
framework behaviors
describeshas sive
taken a social and personality psychol- perspective
a typology based for exploring
on clusters
its conse-
of behavior
iors
quences for the doer/actor (eg, Penner,(eg, sportsmanship,
Dovidio conscientious-
, Piliavin & Schroeder, 2005;
ness, civic virtue, altruism, and courtesy;
Organ,
Thoits1988).
& Hewitt,
Another
2001). approach
However, distin-
no
guishes behaviors by their intended bensuch attention
- research has been
despite paidt hat
the fact in the
OCBsOCB
individuals or OCBI vs. OCBs targeted at areorga-
effective (eg, OCBs
a specific form oftargeted
pro-social at
behaviors
believe that nizations or OCB-Organization; Williams(Spitzmulleret
& Anderson, al., 2008). We
1991).
Spitzmüller et al. the focus on individual-level
majority conse-
of OCB (2008) opines
research can that
bethe vast
subsumed into two
The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 51, No. 4, April 2016 595
596 The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 51, No. 4, April 2016
realized that burnout can also exist out- Hypothesis 2a. OCBI is negatively related
side the human services (Maslach & to burnout of the actor.
Leiter, 1997). It has been established
Hypothesis 2b. OCBO is negatively re-
that pro-social behavior leads to higher related to burnout
affect (Piliavin,ofDovidio,
the actor. positive
Gaertner,
& Clark, 1981), relieves/re- OCB & Psychological Health duces bad moods
(Cialdini & Kenrick, 1976), and enhancescomponent
personal efficacy, The psychological
of self-esteem & confidence
(Giles & health, as conceptualized by Testa and Eyler, 1994; Yates & Youniss,
1996). As Simonson (1996), reflects one's affective
positive all of these
affect, constructs
experiences, which
interact with associ- high personal efficacy, self-esteem
states, processes, andand related cognitive
confidence are
negatively associated judgments about one'snotionlife,
of oneself,
'positive and
psy-the withfuture.
burnout,
Theit is
implied that indulgence chological health'behavior,
refers to like
behaviors,
OCB, can in pro-social
reduce the
burnout levels of the actor. attitudes, andlevel
feelings that represent
of personal an individual's
effectiveness , success,
and satisfaction. Social psychological research has found positive
social behavior on the psychological effects of pro-
behavior (Thoits & Hewitt, 2001). health of those who engage in the
I Indulgence like OCB, can in pro-social reduce the behavior, burnout like OCB, can reduce the burnout I
The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 51, No. 4, April 2016 597
598 The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 51, No. 4, April 2016
out using an eight-item scale developed ing LISREL. To test our hypotheses, we
by Maslach and Jackson (1981). Out of followed the structural equation modeling
eight items, one item was dropped in the approach using LISREL. To assess model fit,
confirmatory factor analysis due to poor relative %2 (x2/df) less than 3; RMSEA less
loading. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient than 0.08; CFI greater than 0.95; SRMR less
for seven items was 0.92. than 0.08; and NNFI
greater than 0.95 were taken as
Relatedness Need Satisfaction was acceptable threshold levels (Hooper et
al., 2008;
a nine-item scale adapted from Leary, Kelley, Kline,and
Cottrell 2005). measured using
Schreindorfer
(2005). The Cronbach's For checking the significance of in -alpha coefficient
was 0.83. direct effects, we used the moretest
rigorous
insteadand
of powerful
Sobe! test,bootstrap
as
suggested by Zhao, Lynch and Chen (2010).
for Indirect
In this
Effects'
test, ifat'Bootstrap
95% confidence
Results
interval do not include
Psychological Health was measured
using a twelve-item scale by Goldberg and
Williams (1988). Confirmatory factor analysis
indicated two separate factors for positively
and negatively worded items. One item was 0 (zero), the indirect effect is significant
dropped in the confirmatory factor analysis and mediation is established.
due to poor loading. The Cronbach's alpha for
psychological health (positive) and Results
The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 51, No. 4, April 201
the seven models revealed an acceptable Next, we specified a model with hypothesized
fit to the data, based on majority of fitness relationships. When we subjected the specified
indicators used: CFA1 (%2 [11] = 45.4, model to test in LISREL, our data supported many
CFI = 0.96, NNF1 = 0.93, RMSEA = 0.08, of the specified relationships between constructs.
SRMR = 0.04); CFA2 (%2 [I] = 1.62, CFI
= 0.99, NN FI = 0.99, RMSEA = 0.04, Specifically, the direct path from OCBI to relatedness
SRMR = 0.01); CFA3 (%2 [1] = 2.87, CFI need satisfaction was significant, but direct paths
= 0.98, NNFI = 0.99, RMSEA - 0.06, from OCBI to burnout and health (both positive and
SRMR = 0.02); CFA4 (%2 [3] = 4.82, CFI negative) were insignificant. On the other hand,
= 0.99, NNFI = 0.99, RMSEA = 0.04, paths from OCBO (positive) to psychological health
SRMR = 0.02); CFA5 (%2 [4] = 8.95, CFI (negative) and OCBO (negative) to psychological
= 0.99, NNFI = 0.98, RMSEA = 0.05, health (positive) were insignificant. However, paths
SRMR = 02); CFA6 (%2 [13] = 42.97, CFI from OCBO (positive) to psychological health
= 0.99, NNFI = 0.98, RMSEA = 0.07, (positive) and OCBO (negative) to psychological
SRMR = 0.02);CFA7 (*2 [27] = 84.22, CFI health (negative) were significant. Additionally, the
= 0.97, NNFI = 0.96, RMSEA = 0.07, hypothesized relationship between relatedness
SRMR = 0.04). need satisfaction and burnout was
600 The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 51, No. 4, April 2016
No.
1 Gender
2 Marital -.07
Status
10 HealthP -.11* .13** .24** .07 .12* .22** .15** -.44** .24** (.78)
11 HealthN -.08 .12* .16** .08 -.02 .02 .25** -.47** .24** .28** (.81)
12 M 3.63 4.19 3.98 2.57 3.62 3.64 3.57
13 SD
with a tion.
(-0. 1 934 test was performed to an indirectrelate 95% From
relationship(as suggested
even
the
if there by Zhao
bootstrap
burnout zero t
rectthrough
effect
faction. that the mean indirect ef
tween OCBI
25* Relatedness
r OCBI 1
y'. Satisfaction 7
-.53*
I Burnout 1
-.58*
£ OCHO «.«»¡v., )
-.52*
y / Psychological
, (Negative) J N. (Negative)' J )
(X .BO J
Second test was performed to check if the proponents of mixed wording approach suggest that
there was an indirect relationship between this practice reduces the dangers of response bias such
relatedness need satisfaction and
as acquiescence, critics suggest that this mixture may
psychological health (positive) through lessen a scale's internal rect effect is significant with a
burn out We found that the mean indi- 95% con- consistency and disrupt its dimensional-
confidence interval excluding zero (0.1 184 ity (Wong,
worded Rindfleisch
scales to & Burroughs,
0.2177). Next 2003).
test wasIn performed
our case, mixed
to
check if there was an indirect relation- lead to disruption of dimensionality
need satisfac- OCBO andofpsychological
ship betweenhealth
relatedness
con- tion
and psychological
case, it is important to decide whether the two factors health
are sub -through (negative)
burnout. structures.
The mean In this
indirect effect
is significant with a 95% confidence statistically meaningful rather than an interval excluding zero (0.1 667
to 0.3420). method artifact. Since, we have used well
These results lend support to the exist- tested and psychometrically
relationship betweenvalidated
scales inence of an indirect
our study, we expect this
prob- relatedness need satisfaction and psycho- (positive
lem to beand
a method artifact,
negative) otherlike in many
cases logical
(reported in health
Tomas &
Oliver, 1999; Wong et al., 2003). through burnout.
Discussion
One interesting result of the study was that OCBO
(positive) and OCBO (negative) related differentially with
This study examines the impact of organizational
psychological health (positive) and psychological health
citizenship behavior on burnout, psychological(negative). On perusal of items of Williams and Andersen
health, and relatedness need satisfaction of the
(1991) scale, the positively worded items of OCBO seem to
actor. Hon represent discretionary but organizationally desirable
on the one hand, OCBI leads to relatedness behavior whereas negatively worded items seem to represent
need satisfaction, which is an essential discretionary but organizationally undesirable behavior. It is
possible that for some "undesirable to desire
nutriment for individual well-being. On the other hand, OCBO
leads to better over-
602 The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 51, No. 4, April 2016
or it could very well be on account of directed at job related aspects while OCB1 is directed
cultural preferences of Indian at interpersonal discretionary
respondents . Similarly continuum can behaviors and OCBO is directed at or-
be perceived differently for condition of organizational level discretionary behavior.
psychological health ("good health and It may well be the case that OCB relates with a
bad health as a continuum" vs. "good phenomenon such as supervisory support (Podsakoff
health and not good health" and bad et al., 2000) and presence of such support relates
health and not bad health" as two with reduction in experiences such as job burnout
separate continuum ). If the respondents' (eg, Kalliath & Beck, 2001 ) but the effect of OCB is
mental models see the continuum as felt indirectly.
separate in both the cases then it is
likely that the positively and negatively
worded items would have differential relations. Yet another
Theoretical & Practical
alternative explanation for differential Contributions
parades
The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 51, No. 4, April 2016 603
604 The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 51, No. 4, April 2016
To inhibit the occurrence of common- always been subject of much interest to method bias,
future studies in this area organizations. As a natural extension
scholarly of can collect
inquiry, data using
it therefore, multiple
makes methods
(eg, interviews,
surveys, peer reports, sense to explore bridging mechanism
designetc.).
that prohibits
Another limitation
states andofthe
ourorganization;
study is its research
and
naturally OCB's role in it. A study which would be ments
well-being
of causality.
measures
The strongest
as mediators
evi- able
of relationship
to use individual
between OCB and turnover intention is between variables of interest to individual
Furthermore, collection of data over web individuals indulge in OCB and after indulging in OCB one
experiences
although we took care to caution participants with is- being. This is well- may have
how OCB its sustained
may be own nuances,
due
to technical glitches. The partici- for longer periods. Similarly differential
on individual pantseffects
howeverof OCBI
were and OCBO
highly
conversant with use of computers and therefore web well-being
area to research
variables
on.may
Rolealso
of based
be an difficulty
interestingis
less likely to be a prob- individual differences
and context such lem. In addition, the sample was more representative of private sector organiza-
as culture in explaining variations in the zations and male
withparticipants. Replica-
individual well -beingrelationship
of the studyoftherefore
OCB
source sector, NGOs and other forms of organi- practitioners
with public
alike.
being
zations
variables
particularly
is likely
with
to significant
be a rich
number of female participants consisting of
References diverse educational background may further add to the generalizability of the Allen, TD &
Rush, MC (1998), "The Effects study particularly in theBehavior
Indian context.
on Performance
of Organizational
Judgments:
Citizenship
A Field Study
and a Laboratory Experiment", Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2): 247-60.
Baard, P., Deci, E. L. & Ryan, RM (2004), "In- behavior, and Business Unit Performance:
intrinsic Need Satisfaction: A Motivational The Bad Apples Do Spoil the Whole Barrel
basis of Performance and Well-being in Two ", Journal of Organizational Behavior ,
Work Settings", Journal of Applied Social 25(1): 67-80.
psychology , 34: 2045-68.
Feather, NT & Rauter, KA (2004), "Organizational
Baumeister, RF & Leary, MR (1995), "The Need to Citizenship Behaviors in Relation to Job
Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Status, Job Insecurity, Organizational
Attachments as a Fundamental Human Commitment and Identification, Job
Motivation", Psychological Bulletin 117(3): , Satisfaction and Work Values", Journal of
497-529. Occupational and Organizational Psychology,
77:81-94.
Biswas, S. & Varma, A. (2012), "Linkages be-
tween Antecedents of In-role Performance
Firth, L., Mellor, DJ, Moore, KA & Loquet, and
Intentions to Quit: an Investigation in C. (2004), "How Can
Journal ofManagers Reduce India",
Human Employee International
Intention to Quit",
Journal of Resource Management, 23: 987-1005.
Managerial Psychology, 19(2): 170-87.
Caprara, GV. & Steca, P. (2005), "Self-efficacy Giles, DE Jr., & Eyler, J. (1994), "The Impact of a
Beliefs as Determinants of Pro-social Be-
College Community Service Laboratory on
behavior Conducive to Life Satisfaction across
Students' Personal, Social, and Cognitive
Ages", Journal of Social and Clinical Outcomes", Journal of Adolescence, 17(4): 327-39.
Psychology, 24: 191-217.
Chen, XP, Hui, C. & Sego, DJ (1998), "The Goldberg, D. & Williams, P. (1988), A User's Role
of Organizational Citizenship Behav- Guide to the General
Turnover: Health Questionnaire,
Conceptualization and Preior in
-Nfer
Nelson Publishing Company Ltd. liminary Tests of Key Hypotheses",
of Applied Psychology , Jour- 83(6): 922-3 1 .
Windsor
606 The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 51, No. 4, April 2016
Leary, MR, Kelly, KM, Cottrell, CA & Penner, LA, Dovidio, JF, Piliavin, JA & Schroeder, DA
Schreindorfer, LS (2005), 'individual (2005), "Pro-social Behaviour: Multilevel
Difference in the Need to Belong: Mapping Perspectives", Annual Review of Psychology, 56:
the Nomological Network', Working Paper, 365-92.
Department of Psychology, Wake Forest
University, Winston-Salem , NC. Perreault, S., Gaudreau, P., Lapointe, MC & Lacroix, C.
(2007), "Does It Take Three to Tango?
Mann, L. 1980, "Cross-cultural Studies of Small Psychological Need Satisfaction and Athlete
Groups", in H. Triandis & R. Brislin (Eds.), Burnout", International Journal of Sport Psychology ,
Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology: 38: 437-50
Social Psychology, Boston: Allyn & Ba-
Piliavin, JA, Dovidio, JF, Gaertner, SL &
con^: 155-209.
Clark, RD Ill (1981), Emergency Intervention, New York:
Maslach, C. & Jackson, SE (1981): "The Measurement of Academic.
Experienced Burnout", Jour- Podsakoff, NP, Whiting,
, SW, Podsakoff, P. nal of Occupational Behavior 2: 99-1 1 3.
M. & Blume, BD (2009), "Individual- and Organizational-
Maslach, C. & Leiter, MP (1997), Truth about Burnout: level Consequences of Organizational Citizenship
How Organizations Cause Personal Stress and Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis", Journal of Applied
What to Do about It, San Francisco, CA: Jossey- Psychology , 94(1): 1 22-4 1.
Bass.
Maslach, C., and Schaufeli, WB (1993), "Historical andPodsakoff, PM, MacKenzie, SB, Paine, JB
Conceptual Development of Burnout", in Schaufeli, & Bachrach, D. G (2000), "Organizational
WB, Maslach, C. Citizenship Behavior: A Critical Review of the
& Marek, T. (Eds.), Professional Burnout: Recent Theoretical and Empirical Literature and Suggestions
Developments in Theory and Research , Washington, for Future Research", Journal of Management, 26:
DC: Taylor & Francis: 5 1 3-63.
1-16.
Podsakoff, PM, MacKenzie, SB, Lee, JY, & Podsakoff,
Maslow, A. (1968): Toward a Psychology of Being , New York, NP 2003, "Common Method
D. Van Nostrand Company. Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical
Review of the Literature and Recommended
Organ, DW (1997), "Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Remedies", Journal of Applied Psychology,
It's Construct Clean-up Time", Human Performance, 88: 879-903.
10(2): 85-97.
Reis, HT, Collins, WA ¿¿Berscheid, E. (2000), "The
Organ, DW (1988), Organizational Citizenship Behavior: the Relationship Context of Human Behavior and
Good Soldier Syndrome, Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. Development", Psychological Bulletin, 126(6):
844-72.
Organ, DW, Podsakoff, PM & MacKenzie, S. Schaufeli, WB & Bakker, AB (2004), "Job
B. (2006), Organizational Citizenship Behaviour: Demands, Job Resources and their Rela-
Its Nature, Antecedents and Consequences ,
tionship with Burnout and Engagement: A
Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Multi-sample Study", Journal of Organizational
Behavior, 25: 293-3 1 5.
Pare, G & Tremblay, M. (2007), "The Influence of High-
involvement Human Resources Spencer SJ, Zanna MP & Fong GT. (2005), Practices, Procedural Justice,
Organizational "Establishing a Causal Chain: Why Experi- Commitment , and Citizenship Behaviors on
ments Are Often More Effective Than Me-
The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations , Vol 51, No. 4, April 2016 607
dational Analyzes in Examining Van den Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., De Witte,
Psychological Processes", Journal of H. & Lens, W. (2008), "Explaining the
Personality and Social Psychology,
845-5 1. 89: Relationships between Job Characteristics,
Burnout and Engagement: The Role of
Spitzmuller, M., Van Dyne, L, & Ilies, R. (2008), Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction",
"Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Work & Stress
, 22: 277-94.
Review and Extension of Its Nomological
Network", in J. Barling & CL Cooper Weinstein, N. & Ryan, RM (2010), "When
(Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Helping Helps: Autonomous Motivation
Organizational Behavior, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sagefor Pro-social Behavior and Its Influence
on Well-being for the Helper and Recipient ",
Sun, LY, Aryee, S. & Law, KS (2007), "High Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
-performance Human Resource Practices, 98: 222-44.
Citizenship Behavior, and Organizational
Performance: A Relational Perspective", Williams, LJ & Anderson, SE 1991 , "Job Sat-
Academy of Management Journal 50(3):
, isfaction and Organizational Commitment as
558-77. Predictors of Organizational Citizenship and In-role
Behaviors", Journal of Man- Tang, CS, Au, W.,
Schwarzer, R. & Schmitz, G agement , 17, (3): 601-17.
(2001), "Mental Health Outcomes of Job Stress
among Chinese Teachers: Role of Wong, N., Rindfleisch, A. & Burroughs, JE
Stress Resource Factors and Burnout", (2003), "Do Reverse- Worded Items Con- Journal of Organizational
Behavior , 22: found Measures in Cross-Cultural Con-
887-901. Sumer Research?", Journal of Consumer
Research 30:72-91.
Testa, MA & Simonson, DC 1996, "Assessment of
quality-of-life outcomes", New England Journal Yates,
of M. ÄYounnis, J. (1996), "A Developmental
Medicine* 334:835-840. Perspective on Community Service in
Adolescence", Social Development , 5(1): Thoits,
PA &
Hewitt, LN (2001), "Volunteer Work and Well- being", Journal of85-111.
Health 42(2): 1 1 5-3 1 .
608 The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations , Vol. 51, No. 4, April 2016