Professional Documents
Culture Documents
6.1 Introduction
We have seen earlier in this book that polymer colloids carry various chemical
groups at the polymer/medium interface. In this chapter the chemistry
involved is examined from two major points of view: (1) controlled synthesis
and (2) chemical reactions at the interface. The practical implications for
doing so are many:
9 Latex paints involve huge production volumes worldwide. The shelf
stability of the paints, pigment dispersion, adhesion to surfaces by the
derived films, and the barrier and dynamic mechanical properties of the
films all are affected by the surface chemistry of the latex particles.
Water-based printing inks have similar considerations.
9 Water-borne adhesives interact with the bonded surfaces by means of
their surface groups, and the moisture-sensitivity of the bonds is affected
as well.
9 Some synthetic fibers are made by emulsion polymerization followed by
coagulation, washing, dissolution in a good solvent and spinning. Sub-
stantivity of dyes is affected by surface groups originating in the emulsion
polymerization. The effluent water from coagulation and washing con-
tains surfactants and other chemicals. Surfactants can be eliminated by
chemically bonding the stabilizing groups to the particle surface.
9 Molding resins are often made by emulsion or suspension polymerization
and must also be coagulated and washed.
9 Polymer colloids are used in important ways in clinical diagnostics, drug
delivery and in chemotherapy.
9 Physicists and chemists are using monodisperse polymer colloids for a host
of experiments, for example in the rheology of complex fluids, measuring
fundamental forces such as dispersion interactions, coagulation kinetics,
steric interactions, and electrical double layer forces. A knowledge of surface
group chemistry and surface charge densities is essential for such studies.
The result is that all radicals derived from the initiator must enter the particles
through the polymer/water interface. If the end group is sufficiently hydro-
philic, it will be held at the interface like a cork on the end of a string, floating
on water. An exception would be free radicals resulting from chain transfer
with monomer or added solvent which would tend to be hydrophobic in most
cases. It is possible, however, to add deliberately a surface-active chain trans-
fer agent containing a functional group. Chain transfer to surfactant also can
occur, and the resulting free radical will tend to stay at the particle surface. Of
course, functional groups can be introduced via monomers containing them,
although it is less likely that they will all be held at the interface, because
monomers may have more hydrophobic moieties than initiator fragments. All
of these potentialities are considered in detail below.
It was shown in Section 2.1.1 that an initiator fragment in the aqueous phase
usually, if not always, reacts with one or more monomer units in the aqueous
phase to form a surface-active free radical. It is this species which enters the
particle through the interface, and it is its chemistry which determines to what
extent it is retained at the interface, and what kind of functionality can be
involved. This is schematically represented in Fig. 102, in which a sulfonate
group is brought to the particle surface.
Some common initiators and the functional groups they produce are given
in Table 6.1. The last item in the list does not produce reactive functional
groups, but the PEG chains on the surface, when used, can greatly affect the
adsorption of molecules and therefore of reactivity. The PEG moieties also
are known to complex alkali metal cations, which may have implications for
catalysis.
~-o-s--,Y/ ~,,o,
3.0
o o
E
E
.=L _ 2.5 - 0 ~,~ " ~ O ' J 0
E o
._~
a ) lJ 0
=~ 2.0
0
--I
1.5 _ l i I , I , !
12 13 14 15 16
[I] [M] 1.'7:z3 4929
Log + -
[P] T
Sulfonate surface groups. One of the most stable surface groups is sulfo-
nate, which resists hydrolysis and oxidation. It is derived from the "SO3
radical, itself readily obtainable from the oxidation of sulfite ion-
Oxidizing agents which have been used include persulfate, iron (III), silver
diammine, and copper (II) tetrammine, as shown in Table 6.1. Ferric ion, and
cupric to a lesser extent, have the problem that as multivalent cations they
6.8
66
E
s
~," 6.4
o
6.2 o/
14 16 1.8
Ionic Strength (mM)
Fig. 104. PS latex diameter dependence upon NaC1 concentration [129].
CHAPTER 6 CHEMISTRY AT THE INTERFACE 151
6.0
,..-55
r
E
~
a
tO ~
5.0-
2o e ,0 ,b
10- AIBA.2HCI (mM)
Fig. 105. PS latex diameter dependence upon AIBA. 2 HC1 concentration [129].
Comonomers beating functional groups tend to be the easiest means for intro-
ducing such groups to the latex particle surface. There are some concerns, however:
9 Small comonomer molecules tend to be water-soluble and therefore cap-
able of forming soluble polyelectrolyte during emulsion polymerization.
Acrylic acid and sodium styrene sulfonate are examples.
9 Functional groups may not be held strongly at the interface, and conse-
quently they can become 'buried' within the particles.
9 With ordinary batch emulsion polymerization there is no way to control
separately both particle size and surface group concentration.
A way to avoid most, if not all, of these problems is to use a strongly surface-
active comonomer. Table 6.2 lists several common functional monomers.
152 POLYMER COLLOIDS" A COMPREHENSIVE INTRODUCTION
TABLE 6.2
Comonomers which give surface functional groups
Name Structure Abbreviation
Weakly surface-active
Acrylic acid CH2=CH 9COOH AA
Acrolein C H 2 = C H 9CHO A
Methacrylic acid CH3
I MAA
CH2-C-COOH
Sulfoethyl methacrylate CH3
I SEM
CH2 = C - COOCH2 CH2 SO3 M +
Sulfomethyl styrene
SMS
- +
CH 2 SO3M
SS
SO3 M +
FS
CHO
CHAPTER 6 CHEMISTRYAT THE INTERFACE 153
TABLE 6.2 -- continued
Name Structure Abbreviation
Strongly surface-active
COO Na +
Styryl undecanoate
SU
Trimethyl ammonium _
HO" .'-J.
-
"O O ~ O U o
OH HO ~ O
OH H3C ~ "~CH2
154 P O L Y M E R COLLOIDS: A C O M P R E H E N S I V E I N T R O D U C T I O N
7o
E
Z
E
t-
O
t-,-
60
I--.-
(1)
O
oo
50
-3
' i
CMC
, -
'2 ....
log [SSDSE]
Fig. 106. Gibbs plot of SSDSE [132].
CHAPTER 6 CHEMISTRY AT THE INTERFACE 155
H O - ( C H 2 - C H 2 0 ) n (CH2)11-SH
in which n was 17, 40 and 75. Latex particle sizes between 99 and 220 nm were
obtained, which in some cases were monodisperse [136].
A useful review of the chemistry of 'surfmers,' 'inisurfs' and 'transurfs' has
been prepared by Guyot and Tauer [137].
One may use conventional chemical reactions to modify the surface groups on
polymer colloids. Sometimes this happens inadvertently. For example during
polymerization with persulfate initiator several reactions occur: sulfate ion
radicals produce organic sulfate ester groups which can be hydrolyzed at a
rate which depends on the pH to form hydroxyl:
9SO4 + nM ) .(M),-OSO~
"(M)n-OSO 4 + H20 9( M ) , - O H + H2SO 4
o
x 60
'E
._S 4o
~J
~' 2o
0
0
~ 0
60 120 180 240
Time (h)
Fig. 107. Surface sulfonic acid-catalyzed hydrolysis of a polymethyl acrylate colloid
at 90~ [138].
158 POLYMER COLLOIDS: A COMPREHENSIVE INTRODUCTION
Surface thiol groups have been used for binding biologically active molecules
as well. For example, the cysteine thiol groups in a protein will form a
disulfide bond with the latex - S H group in the presence of an oxidizing agent
such as ferricyanide. A flexible spacer group is often used to allow the surface
thiol to have greater mobility and to allow a large protein molecule to
approach the latex particle closely enough to react.
Fig. 109. TEM of ultrathin section of 'M-450' magnetic polystyrene particle with
attached hepatocyte. From Danielsen, H. et al. (1986). Scand. J. Immunol. 24, 179-
187. Photo courtesy of the Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Methyl 2.6
n-Butyl 7.7
/-Butyl 7.7
t-Butyl 0.91
n-Pentyl 3.7
i-Pentyl 5.5
t-Pentyl 0.57
6.3.2.1 Decarboxylation
TABLE 6.4
Relative rate constants for latex-catalyzed hydrolysis of n-butyl acetate
COO-
C-N
+ CO 2
0
NO 2 NO2
NBC
6.3.2.2 Hydrolysis
In a different kind of reaction, a bimolecular process catalyzed by a small
molecule, similar rate enhancements were observed in the presence of the same
cationic polymer colloid. The reaction involved the hydrolysis of p-nitrophenyl
diphenyl phosphate catalyzed by o-iodoso-benzoate (IBA). Again the catalysis
took place within the interior of the particles and was greatest for the most
hydrophobic polymer colloid (trimethyl < triethyl < tripropyl < tributyl). In
this case the second-order rate constant was increased 10-fold, and the con-
centration of substrate within the particles, 630-fold for an overall rate
enhancement of 6300 [145]. The mechanism involves concentration of the
substrate in the particles by ion-exchange, as above, along with a small
CHAPTER 6 CHEMISTRY AT THE INTERFACE 163
modification of the rate constant due to a change in the dielectric constant
and solvency of the medium. Latex particles of c. 0.2 #m diameter have the
advantage of their small size compared with that of conventional ion-exchange
resin beads (c. 20 #m diameter) such that diffusion of substrate and (in this
case, catalyst) and product in and out of the particle occurs rapidly. Both this
reaction and the preceding one exhibit the highest rate increases found so far
for any colloidal or polymeric catalytic system.
/ PO(O,t~)2
O O
1 J
+
---- ( )2P02 + m A
NO2 -0 /
/3 represents @
A flow cytometer uses Rayleigh jet technology, the same as that in ink jet
printers, to create microscopic droplets. If the liquid involved contains a
dilute suspension of cells, one can regulate the conditions such that there is
a high probability that any given droplet contains either one or no cells.
The droplets are charged electrostatically by means of an externally applied
field, and fall first through an exciting laser beam and fluorescence/scattering
detectors and then between electrodes whose field can be turned rapidly on
or off. It is important that the polymer colloidal particles are monodisperse
so that their scattering signal is the same for all particles. Drops containing
no cells or those containing unlabelled cells fall directly into a receiver
for them. Those drops containing, say, green dye-labelled particles attached
to 'T4' cells, when detected, cause a field to be applied to the electrodes
with the result that these drops are deviated so as to fall into a different
receptacle. On the other hand, red dye-labelled particle/cell rosettes may
correspond to 'B' cells, which can be deviated with a different applied
potential to fall into their own container. Counting rates as high as
105 rain -1 are possible [148]. Although this may sound impressive, and is
quite acceptable for analytical purposes, preparative quantities are small for
ordinary collection times.
the protein is removed with a high salt buffer and it is ready for analysis,
characterization and use. The particles are ready to be recycled.
A specific example of targeted drug release, but not using polymer colloids,
involves the drug arabino-furanosyl-adenine-monophosphate (ara-AMP).
When this compound is conjugated with lactosaminated serum albumin (L-
SA) it will specifically attach to hepatocytes (liver cells). The drug ara-AMP is
active against Ectromelia virus hepatitis. The conjugated drug was found to
act over four to five times as long in mice as the free drug. Its mechanism of
action is apparently by inhibition of D N A synthesis in liver cells.
Thus there remains a huge opportunity for targeted drugs which act by way
of conjugation to polymer colloids. Concomitantly there are also major chal-
lenges which must be met. These arise from the fact that colloidal particles are
seen by the mammalian immune system as undesirable intruders and are
quickly (sometimes in a matter of minutes) cleared from the blood stream. On
the other hand, such drugs may be especially effective with individuals having
weak immune systems.
A review of polymer-based drug delivery is given in the book by Tarcha
[151]. Chapter 14 in that book, by P.J. Tarcha and R.S. Levinson, discusses
targeted drug delivery.
172 POLYMER COLLOIDS: A COMPREHENSIVE INTRODUCTION
References
126. Fitch, R.M. (1982). In IUPAC Macromolecules (H. Benoit and P. Rempp eds), p. 52,
Pergamon Press, Oxford.
127. Goodwin, J.W., Hearn, J., Ho, C.C. and Ottewill, R.H. (1973). Br. Polym. J. 5, 347.
128. Goodwin, J.W., Ottewill, R.H., Pelton, R., Vianello, G. and Yates, D.E. (1978). Br.
Polym. J. 10, 173.
129. Liu, L.J. and Krieger, I.M. (1978). In Emulsions, Latices and Dispersions (P. Becher
and M.N. Yudenfreund eds), p. 41, Marcel Dekker, New York.
130. Traut, G.R. and Fitch, R.M. (1985). J. Colloid Interface Sci. 104, 216.
131. Fitch, R.M. (1982). In IUPAC Macromolecules (H. Benoit and P. Rempp eds), p. 39,
Pergamon Press, Oxford.
132. Tsaur, S.L. and Fitch, R.M. (1987). J. Colloid Interface Sci. 115, 450.
133. Charreyre, M.T., Boulanger, P., Delair, Th., Mandrand, B. and Pichot, C. (1993).
Colloid Polym. Sci. 271, 668.
134. Fitch, R.M. and McCarvill, W.T. (1978). J. Colloid Interface Sci. 66, 20.
135. Fifield, C.C. (1985). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Connecticut.
136. Vidal, F., Guillot, J. and Guyot, A. (1994). In Proceedings of the 3rd International
Symposium on Radical Copolymers in Dispersed Media, p. 235, R6seau des Polym6r-
istes Lyonnais et Groupe Fran~ais des Polym6res, Lyon.
137. Guyot, A. and Tauer, K. (1994). Adv. Polym. Sci. 111, 43.
138. Fitch, R.M., Gajria, C. and Tarcha, P.J. (1979). J. Colloid Interface Sci. 71, 107.
139. Scholsky, K.M., Tarcha, P.J. and Hsu, A. (1988). In Polymers for Controlled Drug
Delivery (P.J. Tarcha ed), p. 163, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
140. Delair, T., Marguet, V., Pichot, C. and Mandrand, B. (1994). Colloid Polym. Sci.
272, 962.
141. Ugelstad, J., Berge, A., Ellingsen, T., Schmid, R., Nilsen, T.-N., M~rk, P.C., Sten-
stad, P., Hornes, E. and Olsvik, O. (1992). Prog. Polym. Sci. 17, 87.
142. Ugelstad, J., Berge, A., Ellingsen, T., Aune, O., Kilaas, L., Nilsen, T.-N., Schmid, R.,
Stenstad, P., Funderud, S., Kvalheim, G., Nustad, K., Lea, T., Vartdal, F. and
Danielsen, H. (1988). Makromol. Chem., Makromol. Syrup. 17, 177.
143. Fitch, R.M., Mallya, P.K., McCarvill, W.T. and Miller, R.S. (1981). Preprints, Div.
Colloid Surf. Chem., American Chemical Society 182nd Meeting, 23-28 August,
Paper No. 64.
144. Lee, J.J. and Ford, W.T. (1993). J. Organic Chem. 58, 4070.
145. Lee, J.J. and Ford, W.T. (1994). J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 116, 3753.
146. Ford, W.T., Lee, J.J., Yu, H., Ackerson, B.J. and Davis, K.A. (1995). In Macro-
molecular Symposia (J. Guillot, A. Guyot and C. Pichot eds), p. 333, HiJthig and
Wepf Verlag, Heidelberg.
147. Scholsky, K.M. (1982). Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Connecticut.
148. Steinkamp, J.A. (1984). Rev. Sci. Instrum. 55, 1375.
149. Ugelstad, J., Berge, A., Ellingsen, T., Schmid, R., Nilsen, T.-N., Mork, P.C., Sten-
stad, P., Hornes, E. and Olsvik, O. (1992). Prog. Polym. Sci. 17, 87.
150. Rembaum, A., Yen, S.P.S. and Molday, R.S. (1979). J. Macromol. Sci. - Chem. AI3,
603.
151. Tarcha, P.J. (ed) (1990). Polymers for Controlled Drug Delivery, CRC Press, Ann
Arbor, MI.