Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The amounts of sulfuric acid and buffer are adjusted so that Conditions were found under which the reaction between
the solution is certain to be acid during oxidation with bromine iodate and iodide goes t o completion long before liberation of
and the potassium acetate in the buffer will suffice to convert the
excess of sulfuric acid to acetic acid. iodine b y chromate can be detected. This made it possible to
r cent potassium iodide solution is freshly prepared titrate iodate, and, after addition of acid and oxalate, t o
ea?fti:t dissolving 1 gram of the salt in 3.7 cc. of iodine-free titrate chromate present in the same solution.
water. The buffer is prepared by one-twelfth neutralization of The procedure is of value in testing apparatus and methods
glacial acetic acid with a saturated solution of otassium car-
bonate that has been washed with iodine-free aiohol. Let us for determination of iodine in blood, and in preventing re-
suppose that the glacial acetic acid is 17.4 N , and the washed turning end points when these are due to small amounts of
potassium carbonate solution 10.8 N . To 10 cc. of glacial acetic chromate.
lo
acid one would add 17'4 or 1.34 cc. of the carbonate solu-
12 X 10.8 Literature Cited
tion.
(1) dllott, E. N.,Dauphinee, J. A., and Hurtley, W. H., Biochem. J.,
Summary 26, 1665-71 (1932).
(2) Matthews, N. L., Curtis, G. M., and Brode, W. R., IND.ENG.
The reaction between minute concentrations of chromate or CHEM.,Anal. Ed., 10, 612-15 (1938).
dichromate and iodide is influenced b y many factors, notably (3) Shaffer,P. A., and Hartmann, A. F., J . Bid. Chem., 45. 365-90.
acidity, iodide concentration, catalysts such as iron, and ions especially 366 (1921).
(4) Stevens, C. D., J. Lab. Clin. M e d . , 22, 1074-9 (1937).
which form complexes with chromium, such as oxalate and (5) Trevorrow, V., and Fashena, G. J., J . BioZ. Chem., 110, 29-38
tartrate. (1935); 114,351-5 (1936).
This equation is arrived a t in the following manner. by the deviation of the mark from a n ideal circle. As no
The surface i;ension tends to give the drop the shape of a part
of a sphere (since a sphere has the smallest relative surface).
Gravitation on the other hand tends to flatten the drop. The
actual shape of the drop is determined by the simultaneous action TABLEI. RATIO, AOJlu, FOR VARIOUSVALUESOF CONTACT
of both these forces. The effect of the surface tension increases ANGLE@
when u decreases, since the ratio of surface to volume increases
as well; and the effect of gravitation decreases with v since the Change of >hange of
level differences in small drops are small. Therefore very small 9 4
- A:/V per e a:
- A:/D per
drops are pracxically spherical segments, and Equation 1 is the Des. U 10 Deg. U 10
geometrical relation between the diameter, A", of the base of the 30 18.54 0.62 92.5 3.575 0 094
segment, its volume, Y, and the angle, 8 , between the base and the 32.5 17.00 0.54 95 3.34 0 090
35 15.64 0.48 97.5 3.12 0 086
curved surface. 37.5 14.45 0.42 100 2.90 0 082
If the drops are larger than, say, 0.0001 ml., the diameter, A, 40 13.40 0.38 102.5 2.69 0 080
of the circle of contact is appreciably larger than the value, 10, 42.5 12.46 0.34 105 2.495 0 076
45 11.62 0.30 107.5 2.305 0 073
which it would have had in the absence of gravitation. The ratio 47.5 10.87 0.28 110 2.123 0 070
50
a3 has, therefore, to be measured for several values of u and then 52.5
10.18
9.55
0.25
0.23
112.5
115
1.948
1.781
0 067
0 064
55 8.97 0.21 117.5 1.622 0 061
extrapolated to Y = 0. A curve for the relation between A and 57.5 8.44 0.20 120 1.470 0 058
u is given by Wark (4). 60 7.94 0.19 122.5 1.326 0 055
I n order to make the extrapolation to u = 0 feasible, small 62.5 7.475 0.17 125 1.189 0 052
65 7.04 0.16 127.5 1.059 0 048
drops-e. g., 0.001, 0.002, 0.004, and 0.008 m1.-have to be 67.5 6.635 0.15 130 0.938 0 046
used. They are driven out from a microsyringe. The Agla 70 6.25 0.145 132.5 0.823 0 042
micrometer syringe of Burroughs Wellcome & Co. , London, 72.5
75
5.89
5.55
0.14
0.13
135
137.5
0.717
0.618
0 040
0 036
was found very convenient for determining the volume of such 77.5 5.22 0.12 140 0.527 0 033
small drops. It is supplied with a steel needle which is not 80 4.92 0.12 142.5 0.444 0 030
wetted by water and, therefore, delivers drops more readily than 82.5 4.62 0.11 145 0.369 0 027
85 4.34 0.107 147.5 0.302 0 024
B micropipet of glass. 87.5 4.075 0.102 150 0.242
The diameter, A, of the contact circle is measured after the 90 3.82 0.098
evaporation of a drop. After evaporation drops leave a mark on
444 INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY Vol. 13, No. 6
surface (under ordinary conditions) is rigorously uniform, the that the contact angle between air, water, and cellulose ni-
diameter of the contact mark varies from point to point. If trate was about 55".
the average diameter is wrong by 1 per cent the error of the The method here described was used for drops of water on
A3 built-up multilayers of soaps ( d ) , on lacquered tin plate (S),
ratio ; is 3 per cent.
and on glass plates.
A3
When the value of is measured or extrapolated, 8 may U'hen compared with the usual method of a direct measure-
ment of 8 this method is indicated when determination of
be calculated using Table I, which gives the values of the volume and length is simpler than that of angle. It has also
function *(2 - 324
COS e +
coss e)
for 49 values of 0. For non- another advantage. When the profde of a drop is observed,
the angle measured is that for one point only; the same drop
tabulated values of $ a linear interpolation is sufficient. viewed from another side may have a different shape and form
A3 a different contact angle. The area of contact between drop
Table I also shows that a 3 per cent error in f causes an and solid is a measure of an average of all the contact angles
error of about 1 per cent (or less) in the value of 8. If the present along the circumference of the drop, and the shape
solid surface is very good, like those of built-up multilayers of the mark shows how constant (or otherwise) is the contact
angle along this circumference.
(g), can often be determined within *0.6 per cent and 8
therefore calculated within * 0.2". Literature Cited
In a recent paper Benedetti-Pichler and Rachele (1) esti- (1) Benedetti-Pichler, A. A., and Rachele, J. R., IND.ENQ.CHEM.,
Anal. Ed., 12, 233 (1940).
mated the size of minute droplets of water on cellulose nitrate (2) Bikerman, J. J., Tram. Paraday SOC.,36, 412 (1940).
by measuring the diameter of the circle of contact. They (3) Sumner, C . G., The Metal Box Go., Ltd.. London, W. 3., private
found that the ratio was about 9; Table I shows then communications.
(4) Wark, I. W., J . Phys. Chem., 37, 623 (1933).