Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Defendants.
(“LUCKY 13” or “Plaintiffs”) submit the following Statement relating to the Court’s
December 19, 2022, Minute Order [Dkt. No.19], and in support of the filing of their Amended
On October 13, 2022, Plaintiffs filed a Complaint against two-hundred eighteen (218)
Defendants for Trademark Infringement and Counterfeiting (Count I), False Designation of
Origin (Count II), Copyright Infringement (Count III) and Violation of Illinois Uniform
Deceptive Trade Practices Act (Count IV). [Dkt. No. 1]. On October 24, 2022, Plaintiffs filed an
Amended Complaint [Dkt. No. 12] “as a matter of course” pursuant to F.R.C.P. 15(a)(1)(A)
naming five (5) Defendants so that Plaintiffs could more readily: (1) comply with this Court’s
bond requirements; and (2) minimize the risk that Plaintiffs’ would need to request an extension
This Court typically requires a plaintiff to post a bond in the amount of $10,000.00 per
Defendant. See 22-cv-1088 Grumpy Cat Limited v. The Partnerships et al. ($10,000 per
Defendant) [Dkt. No. 24, ⁋ 7]; 21-cv-2670 EMOJI Company GmbH v. The Partnerships et al.
($10,000 per Defendant) [Dkt. No. 18, ⁋ 8]; 21-cv-1012 EMOJI Company GmbH v. The
Partnerships et al. ($10,000 per Defendant) [Dkt. No. 16, ⁋ 10]; 20-cv-7245 Grumpy Cat
Limited v. The Partnerships et al. ($10,000 per Defendant) [Dkt. No. 18, ⁋ 10]; 20-cv-6859
Valentino Rossi v. The Partnerships et al. ($10,000 per Defendant) [Dkt. No. 17, ⁋ 14]; 20-cv-
6607 KTM AG v. The Partnerships et al. ($10,000 per Defendant) [Dkt. No. 24 ⁋ 14] and 20-cv-
3558 Those Characters from Cleveland, LLC v. The Partnerships et al. ($10,000 per Defendant)
In the present case, 218 Defendants were listed in Schedule A to the Complaint. Based
upon prior trademark infringement cases heard by this Court, Plaintiffs would most likely be
required to post a bond in the amount of $2.18 million despite Plaintiffs’ high likelihood of
success on the merits and the minimal risk that any Defendants might sustain any damage. Based
upon current rates, if Plaintiffs were to obtain a surety bond, the premium for a $2.18 million
bond would be 2% of the bond amount, or $43,600. Requiring Plaintiffs to incur such high bond
costs creates a significant financial barrier for Plaintiffs to obtain the requisite injunctive relief
Plaintiffs must file trademark infringement cases like the present case to protect their
intellectual property and prevent consumer confusion against thousands of Defendants selling
counterfeit products in this District. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1), Plaintiffs filed an
Amended Complaint as a matter of course to limit the case to five (5) Defendants to keep the
cost of this Court’s bond requirement to a manageable amount based on recent cases cited above
2
Case: 1:22-cv-05599 Document #: 20 Filed: 12/21/22 Page 3 of 6 PageID #:244
The original 218 Defendants’ internet stores were located on the e-commerce platforms
of ContextLogic, Inc. (“Wish”), Amazon.com, Inc. (“Amazon”), AliExpress and Alipay. The
five (5) remaining Defendants are located on the Wish e-commerce platform. When
Defendants whose internet stores are located on the Wish e-commerce platform because Wish
has recently responded to subpoenas more quickly than Amazon, AliExpress or Alipay. This
Court has previously advised Plaintiffs that it is not likely to extend the TRO beyond fourteen
(14) days. See 22-cv-1088 Grumpy Cat Limited v. The Partnerships et al. [Dkt. No. 23].
Plaintiffs’ counsel included Defendants listed on the Wish e-commerce platform to minimize
the chances that an ex parte TRO would expire prior to Plaintiffs effectuating service and
moving for entry of a Preliminary Injunction which could result in Defendants’ assets being
Plaintiffs refiled against the 213 Defendants in Case No. 22-cv-6502, Blue Sphere, Inc..
d/b/a Lucky 13 and Robert A. Kloetzy v. The Partnerships et al. (J. Guzman). A list of the
Undersigned counsel certify that this Statement is accurate within the meaning of the
Federal Rules.
3
Case: 1:22-cv-05599 Document #: 20 Filed: 12/21/22 Page 4 of 6 PageID #:245
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: December 21, 2022
By: s/Michael A. Hierl
s/William B. Kalbac
s/Robert P. McMurray
Michael A. Hierl (Bar No. 3128021)
William B. Kalbac (Bar No. 6301771)
Robert P. McMurray (Bar No. 6324332)
Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd.
Three First National Plaza
70 W. Madison Street, Suite 4000
Chicago, Illinois 60602
(312) 580-0100 Telephone
mhierl@hsplegal.com
wkalbac@hsplegal.com
rmcmurray@hsplegal.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
BLUE SPHERE, INC. d/b/a LUCKY 13 and
ROBERT A. KLOETZY
4
Case: 1:22-cv-05599 Document #: 20 Filed: 12/21/22 Page 5 of 6 PageID #:246
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned attorney hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the
foregoing Statement was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court and served on all
counsel of record and interested parties via the CM/ECF system on December 21, 2022.
5
Case: 1:22-cv-05599 Document #: 20 Filed: 12/21/22 Page 6 of 6 PageID #:247
6
Case: 1:22-cv-05599 Document #: 20-1 Filed: 12/21/22 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:248
EXHIBIT A
178 Donghui Car Sticker Factory Store Store Defendant No. 172 in 22-cv-6502
179 Free Man Store Defendant No. 173 in 22-cv-6502
180 GoodJob Store Defendant No. 174 in 22-cv-6502
181 hardworking fat man Store Defendant No. 175 in 22-cv-6502
182 HUAICHENG Store Defendant No. 176 in 22-cv-6502
183 HUAIGUAN Store Defendant No. 177 in 22-cv-6502
184 HUAIJING Store Defendant No. 178 in 22-cv-6502
185 HUAIYU Store Defendant No. 179 in 22-cv-6502
186 I am OK 666 Store Defendant No. 180 in 22-cv-6502
187 JACKMA2022 Store Defendant No. 181 in 22-cv-6502
188 JIAYOU2022 Store Defendant No. 182 in 22-cv-6502
189 KDH.9 Store Defendant No. 183 in 22-cv-6502
190 ke le Store Defendant No. 184 in 22-cv-6502
191 kupai Store Defendant No. 185 in 22-cv-6502
192 LYH 1012 Store Defendant No. 186 in 22-cv-6502
193 MOIYY-Fashion Store Defendant No. 187 in 22-cv-6502
194 NIUNIU2022 Store Defendant No. 188 in 22-cv-6502
195 PINK9 Store Defendant No. 189 in 22-cv-6502
196 PLD9 Store Defendant No. 190 in 22-cv-6502
197 SEVENHY Store Defendant No. 191 in 22-cv-6502
198 shes Store Defendant No. 192 in 22-cv-6502
199 Shop11000000001 Store Defendant No. 193 in 22-cv-6502
200 Shop11000083 Store Defendant No. 194 in 22-cv-6502
201 Shop1100341070 Store Defendant No. 195 in 22-cv-6502
202 Shop1100387914 Store Defendant No. 196 in 22-cv-6502
203 Shop1100392869 Store Defendant No. 197 in 22-cv-6502
204 Shop1102175908 Store Defendant No. 198 in 22-cv-6502
205 Shop1102192299 Store Defendant No. 200 in 22-cv-6502
206 Shop1102194869 Store Defendant No. 201 in 22-cv-6502
207 Shop1102203038 Store Defendant No. 202 in 22-cv-6502
208 Shop1102214436 Store Defendant No. 203 in 22-cv-6502
209 Shop1102247219 Store Defendant No. 204 in 22-cv-6502
210 Shop4929060 Store Defendant No. 205 in 22-cv-6502
211 Shop5376248 Store Defendant No. 206 in 22-cv-6502
212 Shop910640041 Store Defendant No. 207 in 22-cv-6502
213 Shop911049138 Store Defendant No. 208 in 22-cv-6502
214 SwellCraft&Art-- Wholesale + Retail Defendant No. 209 in 22-cv-6502
Belt Buckles
215 TOBENO1 Store Defendant No. 210 in 22-cv-6502
216 W-Yunna Official Store Defendant No. 211 in 22-cv-6502
217 ypods Store Defendant No. 212 in 22-cv-6502
218 ZKH Store Defendant No. 213 in 22-cv-6502