‘We may also
ter disorders.
, with a tendency
to be crudely “ask nase ea mental caricature of
“maleness.” T have of ‘cases of men with serious dis:
urbance of genitality whose attitude toward life was one
ff oanding and retentiveness, with a tendency to wnpro-
ductive accumulation, a kind of un-
athe: not onis-recagnived gsi atchailore.
hk ond
‘that she wes onty fast beginning to find out, thanks (0 hin.
For Agafia Mikailovun, for the nurs, for his grandfather, and
‘ven for hit father, Mitia sear onty a weak litte creature who
demanded material attention, but fatuhenche,wiahalneadey &
Auman. beng, with a whole Aastory of moral relatzons. “When
he wakes up, you will see for yousel(” Agafa Mitailosna
ssid, “When T do this, he beams, the darling. His litle face
loots: as bright at the sky on a clear day.” “AM right, we
shall see,” Kitty said in a whisper. “You can go now, he
ja fallng asleep.”
And now Levin, the father:
Kitey, with her sleeves rolled up, was ending over the
bath in which Mitia was Kicking and splashing. When she
heard Beer husbund’s Fooisteps she turned her face towardsMm] THe rueHT rRom woman
him and beckoned him with a smile, She was mpporting the
buay’s head with one hand and sponging him with she other.
“Jur look at him!” she said when her husband came up.
“Agata Mitailovna is right: he is beginning to recognize
people,” An experiment had to be made. Levin bent over
the bath, and the child seemed to know him. The cook wat
then called: she. woo, bent over him and the child frowned
and screwed up its face. Next Kitty bent over him and his
face lighted up swith a smile, He prem his litle hands
fgainst the sponge and male suelt a strange, stise sound
that not only Kiety and the mse, hut even Levioe was trans
ported with jo. ‘The chill was ten from the bath, wrapped
in sheet, rubbed down as i yelled losiy, and corned over
to his mother, °T am glad you are beginning to lve hea a
last” Ritty sid ther husband, as she sic dove in his eae
tomary place with Mitia at her bresat. *Vou always ssid you
had no feling for him, aed it-used to worry me.” “Did. say
that, really? T only meane thae F was disappointed in him”
What disappointed in bint "Not exactly in him, but in
sy feeling for him: 1 hal expected mote. I had expeaed
some new, pleat feeling, but instead there wat only a
sensation of pity, dlagust 2 Kity Hatened to him a she
UE of her lags that she had ten off before bathing the
baby. "There was more fear and pity than satisfaction, 1
never knew until todsy, Goring the storm, how L loved hima”
ite’ face gree exis.
Levin and Kitty represent perfect examples of the fa
ther’s and the mother's relationship to the child. A this
iMluserates how the Cathendeyelopnamsinnsnslationship, 0
the baby”properly wshensthe: baby-just begins to come out
ofeteteinanal ieoeldaaichebephaneonailhallis ccther,
‘oom that pmaticipalcnsmpalgue which we encounter in
Wouaxwoos — [95
fe quotes. Maw dase tat mauenal face
Baby hs been
Bs. Ree Uke car oF a aeiaroiogT
‘who, from bricks and shards, builds up a vanished civilizar
tion. I remember how some of my teachers in prychiatry
used to scoff at Freud's notion that depressions oceur
‘early infancy. Moreover, the idea that schizophrenia or
certain forms of melancholia might go back to carly ma:
ternal deprivation or rejection or merely to conflicts
tutthin the mother, seemed preposterous. The point of
obviously, that to appreciate loss or
conflict. your intellect has first to be developed, To get
depressed by loss you have to be pretty smart; this was the
plied argument, Th es
Freud was vindicated by direct observations of in-
fants, René Spitz has proved by dizect observation of
babies, long after Freud's first hypothetes, that separation
From the mother (or the maternal love object) dur
fancy produces
7
‘Before the age of
‘The age
infants, be-
a5 pia, An engl
sure enltins in ety childhood” The Frgchomal. Sey ot the Chl,
Fin. v015AnaceneDepeaton. The yeh Aye te Ct 7,
tian pte Compare ai the mine maori: "CA Pe int36] Tur ruronrrnow woman
reaved of their mothers during that phase, go through the
riost extraordinary resetion of mourning. Even under the
best conditions of child-care, nutrition and hygiene, they
regress in their mental development, lose weight and ate
susceptible to infections. Their facial expression and atti-
tudes bear a startling resemblance to these encountered
ng psychotic depressions and ather serious psychoses in
adults, Indeed, Helene Deutsctx has shown that inexplis
Cable depressions in grown-ups are repetitions af such early
expericnecs of grief" The unwanted child, long before
there could be any conceptual knowledge ‘af such wn
vwantedness, grows up with a wound quite similar to the
ne sustained by absence or loss of the mother. Teall comes
down to something which was already implied in the ob
servations of comparative zoology quoted above: if we look
‘ver the animal kingdom and distinguish between imper-
sonal factors decisive for the baby’s future, facts of nature
asa whole (weather, vegetation, herd) and individual fac
tors, S ‘hot man’s fate is shaped brom the, beginning
Incidentally, the Fact that the experiences most de-
cisive for our entire life stem from a preverbal, preconcep-
tual and prelogical realm, accounts much more for the
original resistance of academic prychiatry to Frevd than
docs his emphasis on sex. Three centuries of rationalistic
thinking so conditioned scientists that they shied away
from the acceptance of “eauses" which were not causes in a
mechanistic sense, In the Hight of our thesis, i is no ooin-
iy Fieiene. “Atwence of Gre.” Payehanas, Quarters, 6,
womannoon [37
ccidence that so much of that from whieh discursive reason.
ing recoiled was of the world of the maternal
‘The most-obyious scientific. argument against all.sex-
‘woman scale mountaint—without being perverted. This,
however. does not speak against the existence of sexual
characteristics. We know that every person harbours his
fontreserusl anlage, 2nd Couble dupa uabascuamions a]
1. The
“aumalaaaiuaeciaiaietyiaseaiing +2 for oo
irmpone ove mus limit oacoes to fem pints, Fit,
Anatomical and physiolasical observation arvived at eon-
‘lusions at which psychoanalysis had arrived quite inde-
pendently, Sccondly, this is one of the few points in which
those disciples of Freud who parted from him at an early
phase, namely Jung and Adter, remained in some agree
ment, although their elaborations led them in widely
different directions, Tis
tail Jungs theory of “Animus and “Anima.” Nowheve is
nal relatednes as well as the difference between
hete in de
Freud more apparent than here, A lot of what is
na concept is contained
Bue since Freud's
jeveat is pri
atily clinical and Jung's generally symbolic the points of
nape tit theory are one in: Hr Jang. Auimue
"Veo Eaays The Ansty! Porgy Cab of New Hoek,8] tae surewr prow wouas
concordance are not obvious. To the clinician, skipping
the biological is always suspect, Adier’s concept of the
“masculine protest” overlaps toa considerable degree with
Freud's observations on phallic women,
However, the most striking feature is the fact that
Hastatthhinaietlegaddamale 'egmaaledsher” (Cen.
1,27). Aswe have said, ehisnaginterpreted, long before the
audvent of mover science, to mean thatQifamsnvit fullness
fuexyel We do not need vo quote verbatian the famous
py
passage iit Phawasensymposivin in whic
makes the sume affirmation, and explaine the mutual at
traction of the sexes ont of the need to restitute a whole:
rman and woman, im the sex act, are twa halves which Fuse
in order to reatitute the original fullness of Man. A Platone
ist might say thar our bisexuality i6 a shadow of all this,
sketched into the human image. Ariatomilallythe. mor
been summed up by Helene Deutsch: “Woman and
“Man’ have, at one time, arisen out of « ggmmon origin
which is still Tiving on in the bisexual anfage in all human,
wowaxnoon [39
mathe. 7 Is (ge
gengeschlechilche Reste i the
fegchie budget ofthe individual the taa component, male
and female, must be linked in harmony" What “linked
fn harmony” actually means cannot be exsily explained
without going into a grent amount of clinical ebserva-
tion." At any rate, the
\naarelicnietlalteldadeslanbietetesiay” (ester
Lebensschicksal, Helene Deutsch). The significance of this
observation can hardly be exigaerated, 1 isnot only con
firmed in everyday clinical experience but aso ie elds of
porchiatry to which, a ist sight, it doesnot seem to apply.
Now we ask ourselves: does it have implications beyond
psychology? To the philosopher, nothing is purcly paycho-
logical or purely biological, ‘The very fact chat through
ee re ee ee
5 lowphy, the theme of “existence” versus
Ba coe pair locate Soe oot ga
the fence of wider impliention) Ryarycenupitical
‘This particularly tre about
cour abject. The body of science, like thote corpses in at
cient legends, ia alweapt in search ofa suppléntent déme
Deck, Helene, im Prowse. Loe (The Hale ne mina)
Coleridge made the watement,amstog for in die “Tse trwth [at
peat tid mat be sidiogyosuc™ This hele for evry only
peat tind Dut i 4 9ay mic we cannot ye dee wit cna
Pine Compare Bellen, ET, Childhood end Seley. Norton, New York,
tn
ie8] tae surewr prow wouas
concordance are not obvious. To the clinician, skipping
the biological is always suspect, Adier’s concept of the
“masculine protest” overlaps toa considerable degree with
Freud's observations on phallic women,
However, the most striking feature is the fact that
Hastatthhinaietlegaddamale 'egmaaledsher” (Cen.
1,27). Aswe have said, ehisnaginterpreted, long before the
audvent of mover science, to mean thatQifamsnvit fullness
fuexyel We do not need vo quote verbatian the famous
py
passage iit Phawasensymposivin in whic
makes the sume affirmation, and explaine the mutual at
traction of the sexes ont of the need to restitute a whole:
rman and woman, im the sex act, are twa halves which Fuse
in order to reatitute the original fullness of Man. A Platone
ist might say thar our bisexuality i6 a shadow of all this,
sketched into the human image. Ariatomilallythe. mor
been summed up by Helene Deutsch: “Woman and
“Man’ have, at one time, arisen out of « ggmmon origin
which is still Tiving on in the bisexual anfage in all human,
wowaxnoon [39
mathe. 7 Is (ge
gengeschlechilche Reste i the
fegchie budget ofthe individual the taa component, male
and female, must be linked in harmony" What “linked
fn harmony” actually means cannot be exsily explained
without going into a grent amount of clinical ebserva-
tion." At any rate, the
\naarelicnietlalteldadeslanbietetesiay” (ester
Lebensschicksal, Helene Deutsch). The significance of this
observation can hardly be exigaerated, 1 isnot only con
firmed in everyday clinical experience but aso ie elds of
porchiatry to which, a ist sight, it doesnot seem to apply.
Now we ask ourselves: does it have implications beyond
psychology? To the philosopher, nothing is purcly paycho-
logical or purely biological, ‘The very fact chat through
ee re ee ee
5 lowphy, the theme of “existence” versus
Ba coe pair locate Soe oot ga
the fence of wider impliention) Ryarycenupitical
‘This particularly tre about
cour abject. The body of science, like thote corpses in at
cient legends, ia alweapt in search ofa suppléntent déme
Deck, Helene, im Prowse. Loe (The Hale ne mina)
Coleridge made the watement,amstog for in die “Tse trwth [at
peat tid mat be sidiogyosuc™ This hele for evry only
peat tind Dut i 4 9ay mic we cannot ye dee wit cna
Pine Compare Bellen, ET, Childhood end Seley. Norton, New York,
tn
ie