Effect of magnetism and phonons on localized carriers in the ferrimagnetic kagome

metals GdMn6 Sn6 and TbMn6 Sn6

M. Wenzel,1, ∗ A. A. Tsirlin,2, 3 O. Iakutkina,1 Q. Yin,4 H.C. Lei,4 M. Dressel,1 and E. Uykur1, 5
1
1. Physikalisches Institut, Universität Stuttgart, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
2
Felix Bloch Institute for Solid-State Physics, Leipzig University, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
3
Experimental Physics VI, Center for Electronic Correlations and Magnetism,
Institute of Physics, University of Augsburg, 86135 Augsburg, Germany
4
Laboratory for Neutron Scattering, and Beijing Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Functional Materials MicroNano Devices,
Department of Physics, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China
5
Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Ion Beam Physics and Materials Research, 01328 Dresden, Germany
(Dated: December 22, 2022)
arXiv:2208.00756v2 [cond-mat.str-el] 21 Dec 2022

Kagome metals possess peculiar optical spectra consisting of contributions from free charge carri-
ers in a Drude-type response, localized carriers seen as a strongly temperature-dependent localization
peak, and, in some cases, phonons displaying strong anomalies. The rare-earth kagome metal series,
RMn6 Sn6 , provides a marvelous playground to study the electronic properties of kagome metals in
the presence of variable magnetic order. Here, we report temperature-dependent reflectivity studies
on two members of the RMn6 Sn6 family, GdMn6 Sn6 (in-plane ferrimagnet) and TbMn6 Sn6 (out-
of-plane ferrimagnet), in a broad energy range (50 - 18000 cm−1 , equivalent to 6.2 meV - 2.23 eV)
down to 10 K. At high temperatures, a phonon mode at approximately 160 cm−1 is observed, which
becomes screened out in TbMn6 Sn6 below ∼ 150 K as the localization peak linearly passes through
the mode. In GdMn6 Sn6 , the disappearance of the phonon is accompanied by the onset of saturation
of the peak position, suggesting an unusual interplay between the two features.

Proposed by Syôzi in 1951, the kagome lattice quickly
became popular among both theoretical and experimen-
tal physicists due to its unique magnetic and electronic
properties [1, 2]. Consisting of spatially separated metal-
lic kagome planes, kagome metals are model compounds
for studying strong electronic correlations, magnetism,
and topologically non-trivial states [3]. Here, the itiner-
ant carriers give rise to the peculiar kagome electronic
band structure hosting dispersionless flat bands, saddle
points, as well as linearly dispersing Dirac bands [4–9].
The ternary rare-earth series, RMn6 Sn6 (R = Sc, Y,
Gd-Lu), opens new ways to investigate the influence of
magnetism on the electronic properties of kagome met-
als and hence, distinguish between magnetic-driven and
kagome layer-driven properties. While these compounds
have been studied extensively over the last three decades
regarding their unusual magnetic structure, they recently
gained attention in the framework of kagome metals [10–
12]. These compounds crystallize in the P 6/mmm space
group featuring spatially decoupled magnetic Mn-kagome
planes stacked along the c-axis, which are stabilized by
Sn1 atoms. Within one unit cell, the kagome layers are
separated by non-magnetic Sn2 atoms forming a hon-
eycomb lattice, while RSn3 layers separate the kagome
planes from one unit cell to another, as sketched in
Figs. 1(a) and 1(b). The underlying magnetic structure
strongly depends on the rare-earth element separating
the layers, resulting in a large variety of ferrimagnetic (R
= Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho) and antiferromagnetic (R = Sc, Y,
Er, Tm, Yb, Lu) ground states across the series [10, 13].
∗ maxim.wenzel@pi1.physik.uni-stuttgart.de
Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES)
and Landau level measurements reveal the signatures
of the kagome lattice, including topologically non-
trivial Dirac bands and flat bands in these materi-
als [7, 9, 12, 14]. Comprising spin-polarized Mn 3d
states with a strong intrinsic spin-orbit coupling, these
two-dimensional kagome bands exhibit non-trivial Chern
numbers [6, 7, 15] giving rise to an intrinsic anomalous
Hall effect [16–21]. While the different magnetic struc-
tures do not seem to affect the main band dispersions
near the Fermi energy EF , significantly, a gap at the
Dirac points has been proposed only for the ferrimag-
netic systems [12, 22–24]. Moreover, this Chern gap, as
well as the energy of the Dirac points ED , can be tuned
with the rare-earth element [22]. Here, the number of
unpaired 4f electrons of the rare-earth element plays an
important role as a coupling between the 4f and the 3d
electrons is observed.
The key implications of these topological features lie in
unusual transport properties that crucially rely on charge
carriers and their dynamics [12, 27–29]. Especially the ef-
fect of magnetism is one of the central issues [30]. There-
fore, here, we study these dynamics and their depen-
dence on the magnetic order with temperature-dependent
broadband Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy stud-
ies on RMn6 Sn6 systems, namely on GdMn6 Sn6 and
TbMn6 Sn6 . While both systems possess an almost iden-
tical crystal structure and a ferrimagnetic ground state
below room temperature, in the former one, the spins are
aligned within the kagome plane, whereas in the Tb com-
pound, a perpendicular alignment to the kagome layers is
reported [10, 13, 31–33]. This was confirmed prior to our
optical study by dc transport and magnetic susceptibil-
ity measurements shown in Figs. 1(c) and 1(d). We fur-
 2

E n e rg y (e V )
0 .0 1 0 .1 1

7 .0 (c ) G d M n 6S n 1 0 K
1 .6 6
1 5 0 5 0 K

)
E II a b

-1
6 .5 G d M n 6S n 1 0 0 K

χ ( µB / f . u . )
1 .2

ρ ( µΩc m )

σ1 ( 1 0 4 Ω- 1 c m
6
1 0 0 1 5 0 K
6 .0 0 .8 1 7 5 K

5 .5 H = 0 .1 T 5 0
0 .4
H II a b
(e )
5 .0 0 0 .0
6 (d ) T b M n 6S n 2 0 0 K
6 1 .6 T b M n 6S n 6
5 0 .9 d ρ/ d T
1 5 0 2 2 5 K

-1
)
E II a b 2 5 0 K
χ ( µB / f . u . )

ρ ( µΩc m )
0 .6 1 .2

σ1 ( 1 0 4 Ω- 1 c m
1 0 0 2 7 5 K
3 0 .3 3 0 0 K
3 0 0 3 3 0 0 .8
2 T (K ) H = 0 .1 T 5 0
1 H II a b T r
0 .4
0 (f)
0 0 .0
0 1 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
-1
T e m p e ra tu re (K ) F re q u e n c y (c m )

FIG. 1. (a) and (b) Crystal and magnetic structure below 300 K of GdMn6 Sn6 and TbMn6 Sn6 , respectively [13, 25]. (c) and (d)
Magnetic susceptibility and dc resistivity curves measured in the ab-plane. The Curie temperature of both systems lies above
the measured temperature range; however, a spin reorientation from the basal plane near to the c-axis around Tr ∼ 310 K
is visible for TbMn6 Sn6 . For GdMn6 Sn6 , no anomalies are observed in the measured temperature range. Open circles are
the dc resistivity values obtained from the Hagen-Rubens fits of the optical measurements as explained in the Supplemental
Material [26]. (e) and (f) Temperature-dependent in-plane optical conductivity with the dotted lines being the Hagen-Rubens
extrapolation to low energies.

ther performed density functional theory plus Hubbard data at 300 K. With this peak showing a strong red-shift
U (DFT+U ) calculations to evaluate the electronic struc- upon cooling, it puts the RMn6 Sn6 series on common
tures, revealing the correlated character of the RMn6 Sn6 ground with other kagome metals and clearly separates
series. Due to localization effects, the optical response this feature from other low-energy transitions, which are
of the charge carriers splits into the conventional Drude interband in nature [34, 36–38].
part and a prominent low-energy peak. This peak shows A closer look at the low-energy regime reveals sub-
a clear dependence on the magnetic order and underlies stantial differences between the two ferrimagnetic com-
the magnetic tunability of this compound family. pounds. Figures 2 (b) and 2(d) show the temper-
Figures 1(e) and 1(f) display the temperature- ature evolution of this so-called localization peak in
dependent real part of the in-plane optical conductiv- GdMn6 Sn6 and TbMn6 Sn6 after subtracting the fitted
ity of GdMn6 Sn6 and TbMn6 Sn6 , respectively. At first Drude, phonon, and interband contributions from the
glance, the spectra are remarkably similar and resem- experimental optical conductivity. Not only is the lo-
ble the spectrum of the ferromagnetic Fe3 Sn2 [34, 35]. calization peak more pronounced in the in-plane ferri-
Consistent with the metallic nature of these compounds, magnetic system GdMn6 Sn6 , but the peak position sat-
a very narrow Drude component is observed at low en- urates at low temperatures, as shown in Fig. 2(a). In
ergies, which becomes even sharper upon cooling. For contrast, a linear red-shift over the whole temperature
GdMn6 Sn6 , only the tail of this feature is visible even at range is observed in TbMn6 Sn6 [see Fig. 2(c)]. Hence,
300 K. Two step-like absorption features can be identified the peak moves out of the measured range at low tem-
in the otherwise relatively flat conductivity at high ener- peratures, and its position has to be estimated from its
gies. Very similar steps were interpreted as the signature high-frequency tail, as well as by considering the linear
of two-dimensional Dirac fermions in Fe3 Sn2 . In addi- behavior of the shift at higher temperatures, leading to
tion to the sharp Drude component and interband tran- increasing error bars of the fits.
sitions, a phonon mode around 160 cm−1 is observed. Visually, the temperature evolution of the peak posi-
Furthermore, we have realized that the low-energy dy- tion in GdMn6 Sn6 looks strikingly similar to the behavior
namics cannot be reproduced only with a single Drude in Fe3 Sn2 . For the latter, a possible coupling between the
component, but an additional peak-like absorption fea- localization peak and the underlying magnetic structure
ture is required as shown in Fig. 2 (a) and (b) for the is discussed since the linear scaling breaks down after a
 3

E n e rg y (e V ) E n e rg y (e V )
0 .0 1 0 .1 1 0 .0 1 0 .1 1
3 0 0
1 .2 (a ) e x p e r im e n t 1 .0
G d M n 6S n (c ) G d M n 6S n (e )
6 6

)
R e fle c tiv ity
to ta l fit 8

-1
0 .9
1 .0 D ru d e 1 0 K
)

)
P e a k P o s itio n ( c m
-1

-1
lo c a liz a tio n 0 .8 3 0 0 K
0 .8 2 0 0 ωP 1 0 0 K
σ1 ( 1 0 4 Ω- 1 c m

σ1 ( 1 0 3 Ω- 1 c m
p h o n o n h o n o n
6
0 .7
in te rb a n d 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
0 .6 F re q u e n c y (c m
-1
) 2 0 0 K
4
0 .4 1 0 0 3 0 0 K
2
0 .2 G d M n 6S n 6
0 .0 0 0
3 0 0
1 .2 (b ) 1 .0
T b M n 6S n T b M n 6S n (f)
6 6

)
R e fle c tiv ity

-1
0 .9
1 .0 1 0 K

)
P e a k P o s itio n ( c m
)

-1
-1

0 .8 3 0 0 K 2 0 0
0 .8 ωP

σ1 ( 1 0 3 Ω- 1 c m
6
σ1 ( 1 0 4 Ω- 1 c m

0 .7 h o n o n
1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
0 .6 -1
1 0 0 K
F re q u e n c y (c m ) 4
0 .4 1 0 0
2 0 0 K
2
0 .2 T b M n 6S n 6 (d ) 3 0 0 K
0 .0 0 0
1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
-1 -1
F re q u e n c y (c m ) T e m p e ra tu re (K ) F re q u e n c y (c m )

FIG. 2. (a) and (b) Decomposed optical conductivity at 300 K, consisting of a Drude component (purple), a localization peak
(blue), a phonon mode (green), and several interband transitions (orange). The insets show the total fit to the measured
reflectivity. Details on the fitting process as well as the decomposed spectra at lower temperatures can be found in the
Supplemental Material [26]. (c) and (d) Temperature dependence of the localization peak position. The red dashed line marks
the phonon mode, while the red arrow indicates the temperature where the mode disappears. (e) and (f) Temperature evolution
of the localization peak, obtained by subtracting the fitted Drude, phonon mode, and interband contributions from the spectra.
The solid lines are the Fratini model fits to the total experimental conductivity as described in the Supplemental Material [26].

reorientation of the Fe-spins at 120 K [34, 39]. Addition- tunneling microscopy (STM) studies of paramagnetic
ally, the shape of the peak transforms into a sharp Fano CoSn [42].
resonance. The saturation as observed in GdMn6 Sn6 was DFT calculations, shown in the Supplemental Mate-
also reported in the non-magnetic KV3 Sb5 , suggesting rial [26], reveal a total number of nine IR-active phonon
that the origin of this effect may be other than mag- modes in each compound. Four of these modes have the
netic. Additionally, no change of the in-plane ferrimag- A2u symmetry involving out-of-plane atomic displace-
netic structure of GdMn6 Sn6 is reported below room tem- ments and hence, cannot be detected by our in-plane
perature; hence, the primary cause for the observed satu- measurements. While in highly metallic systems phonon
ration must be something else. Nevertheless, a common- modes are often too weak to be detected and/or screened
ality between the two magnetic systems is the in-plane by the free carriers, our measurements were able to cap-
direction of the magnetic moments in both Fe3 Sn2 below ture a prominent E1u mode around 160 cm−1 at room
its spin-reorientation transition and GdMn6 Sn6 . temperature. At low temperatures, this mode disap-
One plausible explanation for the observed saturation pears in both compounds. At first glance, this anomalous
uniting magnetic and non-magnetic kagome metals is the behavior might be explained by a structural distortion;
involvement of a phonon mode. Indeed, phonons and however, low-temperature XRD studies report almost no
their importance for the electronic structure of kagome changes in the crystal structure of RMn6 Sn6 down to 2 K
metals have been studied in multiple compounds. In the [13, 25]. Hence, an interplay between the phonon mode
AV3 Sb5 family, phonons are discussed to be the driv- and the localization peak has to be considered as a possi-
ing force behind the charge-density-wave formation and ble scenario, not least because both features are located
the low-temperature superconductivity [40, 41]. Opti- around the same energy range.
cal measurements revealed strong phonon anomalies as- For a further comparison of the two features, the posi-
sociated with a coupling of the phonon modes to the tion of the phonon mode is marked with the red dashed
electronic background in KV3 Sb5 and RbV3 Sb5 [36, 37]. line in Figs. 2(a) and 2(c), while the red arrow points
Furthermore, a strong interplay between phonons and at the temperature at which the phonon mode disap-
fermionic degrees of freedom was revealed by scanning pears in each compound. In TbMn6 Sn6 , the phonon
 4

mode disappears as soon as the localization peak passes E n e rg y (e V )

through it, suggesting that the localization peak screens 0 .1 1
out the phonon mode. On the other hand, a more com-
plex relationship between the two features is observed in (a )
6 e x p e r im e n t a t 1 0 K
GdMn6 Sn6 . Here, the phonon mode shows an enhance-

)
5 s to ic h io m e tr ic

-1
ment and a slight broadening as the localization peak

σ1 ( 1 0 3 Ω- 1 c m
4
passes through it, and is retained even below the cross-
3
ing over a narrow temperature range. Eventually, the
mode disappears around the temperature where the po- 2
sition of the localization peak saturates. This behavior 1 G d M n 6S n 6

suggests an unusual coupling between the phonon mode 0

and the localization peak in GdMn6 Sn6 . Based on the ob- (b )
servation that the strong localization peak anomalies ap- 6 e x p e r im e n t a t 1 0 K
s to ic h io m e tr ic

)
pear in the in-plane ferromagnetic system, one plausible 5

-1
µ= - 4 7 m e V

σ1 ( 1 0 3 Ω- 1 c m
explanation would be a magneto-elastic coupling to the 4
U M n = 0 .4 e V
in-plane infrared-active phonon mode. Additionally, the 3
rare-earth element could directly influence the phonon 2
mode and hence its interplay with the localization peak. T b M n 6S n
1 6
Ultimately, an interplay with some other bosonic ex-
0
citations such as magnons, for instance, could as well 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
lead to the distinct behavior of the localization peak in -1
GdMn6 Sn6 compared to TbMn6 Sn6 . Indeed, magnon F re q u e n c y (c m )
bands extending to energies up to ∼ 100 meV have c o r r e la tio n s
been reported in several members of the RMn6 Sn6 family
[43, 44]. (c ) K V 3
S b 5
R b V 3
S b 5
C s V 3
S b 5

The presence of a red-shifting localization peak is a

common occurrence in systems with slow electron dy-
namics, such as organic conductors, cuprates, and man-
ganites [45, 46], many of them being strongly correlated
materials. Hence, we now turn to analyzing the elec-
tronic correlations in the RMn6 Sn6 series. Figures 3(a)
and 3(b) show the comparison between the experimental
and the calculated optical conductivities using DFT tak-
ing into account the different magnetic structures. For
all calculations, a Hubbard UR = 10 eV was added
to the rare-earth element with the DFT+U method us-
ing the double-counting correction in the fully localized
limit to treat the strongly correlated 4f electrons [9, 47–
49]. In the case of GdMn6 Sn6 , a good agreement with
the experiment is found, while for TbMn6 Sn6 , the low-
energy spectral weight cannot be reproduced with this
method. The agreement is improved by adding a Hub-
bard UMn = 0.4 eV to the Mn-atoms. Another possibility
is shifting the Fermi energy down by 47 meV; however,
this requires removing one electron from the structure,
which is hard to reconcile with the system.
Although with different adjustments, one can bring the
calculations to the experiment’s level, in either case, the
energy of the calculated conductivity needs to be rescaled
by a factor of 2.5 in GdMn6 Sn6 (2 in TbMn6 Sn6 ). A very
similar scaling factor was previously reported for ARPES
measurements of GdMn6 Sn6 [9]. This suggests that these
systems are clearly beyond DFT, and electronic correla-
tions therein can not be fully treated on the mean-field
DFT+U level.
We further observed the step-like absorption features,
combined with the relatively flat optical conductivity, as
the potential signatures of the Dirac points in these sys-
Z r S iS
R e M n 6S n 6 C o 3S n 2S Z r S iS e
2
W T e 2
0 .0 0 .2 0 .4 0 .6 0 .8 1 .0
S W / S W
D ru d e b a n d
FIG. 3. (a) and (b) Experimental interband transitions along
with the DFT+U calculated optical conductivity. For all cal-
culations a Hubbard UR = 10 eV was added to the rare-earth
element. Furthermore, the energy scale of the calculated con-
ductivity is rescaled for a better comparison with the experi-
ment. (c) Correlation scaling for different kagome metals and
other topological materials taken from ref. [50].
tems. Considering that there are two Dirac points, one
above and one below the Fermi energy (see Supplemen-
tal Material [26]), one would expect these step-like ab-
sorption features to appear [34]. This interpretation be-
comes even more tempting when the energies of the steps
are compared with the ARPES measurements. However,
considering the relatively high energy range of these fea-
tures and the significant number of bands crossing the
Fermi energy, the step-like absorption is most likely just
a cumulative effect of different contributions; hence, one
should be careful in its assignment. On the other hand,
absorption features at lower energies (ω < 1000 cm−1 )
can be related to transitions between bands very close
to the Fermi energy, most probably involving transitions
between the saddle points nearby the M point, as shown
in our band structure calculations in the Supplemental
Material [26].

Although the RMn6 Sn6 series lies beyond the limits
of the DFT+U methods presented here, the calcula-
tions can be used for an initial assessment of the cor-
relation strength. As proposed previously for different
compounds, including cuprates, iron pnictides, and topo-
logically nontrivial Dirac systems [50, 51], the ratio of
the spectral weight of the mobile carriers from the ex-
periment and the DFT calculations can be used as a
gauge of electronic correlations. Here, SWDrude /SWband
is close to 1 for uncorrelated materials, while the ra-
tio becomes zero for Mott insulators showing the most
correlated behavior. Figure 3(c) depicts this scaling
for the AV3 Sb5 series and topological semimetals taken
from refs. [36, 50]. From the calculations, we can deter-
mine a rough value of SWDrude /SWband ≈ 0.2, point-
ing towards much stronger correlations in comparison
with the AV3 Sb5 series and other kagome metals re-
ported to date. Moreover, no significant difference be-
tween GdMn6 Sn6 and TbMn6 Sn6 is observed, whereas
the correlation strength changes drastically between dif-
ferent members of the AV3 Sb5 family.
In summary, we establish the correlated nature of ferri-
magnetic kagome metals of the RMn6 Sn6 family and un-
cover partial localization of charge carriers manifested by
the prominent low-energy peak in the optical conductiv-
ity. The temperature evolution of this peak is sensitive to
details of the magnetic order. While in TbMn6 Sn6 , the
localization peak red-shifts linearly through the whole
temperature range upon cooling and screens out the
[1] I. Syôzi, Statistics of Kagomé Lattice, Progress of Theo-
retical Physics 6, 306 (1951).
[2] M. Mekata, Kagome: The Story of the Basketweave Lat-
tice, Physics Today 56, 12 (2003).
[3] D. F. Liu, A. J. Liang, E. K. Liu, Q. N. Xu, Y. W.
Li, C. Chen, D. Pei, W. J. Shi, S. K. Mo, P. Dudin,
T. Kim, C. Cacho, G. Li, Y. Sun, L. X. Yang, Z. K. Liu,
S. S. P. Parkin, C. Felser, and Y. L. Chen, Magnetic Weyl
semimetal phase in a Kagomé crystal, Science 365, 1282
(2019).
[4] W.-S. Wang, Z.-Z. Li, Y.-Y. Xiang, and Q.-H. Wang,
Competing electronic orders on kagome lattices at van
Hove filling, Phys. Rev. B 87, 115135 (2013).
[5] Z. Lin, J.-H. Choi, Q. Zhang, W. Qin, S. Yi, P. Wang,
L. Li, Y. Wang, H. Zhang, Z. Sun, L. Wei, S. Zhang,
T. Guo, Q. Lu, J.-H. Cho, C. Zeng, and Z. Zhang, Flat-
bands and Emergent Ferromagnetic Ordering in Fe3 Sn2
Kagome Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 096401 (2018).
[6] M. Kang, L. Ye, S. Fang, J.-S. You, A. Levitan, M. Han,
J. I. Facio, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg,
M. K. Chan, R. D. McDonald, D. Graf, K. Kaznatcheev,
E. Vescovo, D. C. Bell, E. Kaxiras, J. van den Brink,
M. Richter, M. Prasad Ghimire, J. G. Checkelsky, and
R. Comin, Dirac fermions and flat bands in the ideal
kagome metal FeSn, Nature Materials 19, 163 (2020).
[7] M. Li, Q. Wang, G. Wang, Z. Yuan, W. Song, R. Lou,
Z. Liu, Y. Huang, Z. Liu, H. Lei, Z. Yin, and S. Wang,
Dirac cone, flat band and saddle point in kagome magnet
5
phonon mode at ∼ 160 cm−1 , it displays different char-
acteristics in GdMn6 Sn6 . Here, the peak is more pro-
nounced, while its position saturates at low tempera-
tures. This dissimilar behavior indicates a major dif-
ference in low-energy degrees of freedom that damp elec-
tron dynamics and, consequently, should affect transport
properties at low temperatures. Both compounds dis-
play a strongly correlated character, as a good agreement
with the experimental interband transitions is only found
after rescaling the energy of the calculated optical con-
ductivity, and the experimental Drude spectral weight is
drastically lower than the DFT prediction.
The authors acknowledge the fruitful discussion with
Simone Fratini, and technical support by Gabriele Un-
tereiner. We also thank Falk Lissner and Rainer Niewa
for the XRD measurements. H.C.L. was supported
by National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No.
2018YFE0202600), the Beijing Natural Science Foun-
dation (Grant No. Z200005), the Fundamental Re-
search Funds for the Central Universities and Research
Funds of Renmin University of China (RUC) (Grant
Nos. 18XNLG14, 19XNLG13, and 19XNLG17), and
the Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter
Physics. The work has been supported by the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) via Grants No. UY63/2-
1, No. DR228/48-1, and No. DR228/51-1. E. U. ac-
knowledges the European Social Fund and the Baden-
Württemberg Stiftung for the financial support of this
research project by the Eliteprogramme.
YMn6 Sn6 , Nature Communications 12, 3129 (2021).
[8] Z. Liu, M. Li, Q. Wang, G. Wang, C. Wen, K. Jiang,
X. Lu, S. Yan, Y. Huang, D. Shen, J.-X. Yin, Z. Wang,
Z. Yin, H. Lei, and S. Wang, Orbital-selective Dirac
fermions and extremely flat bands in frustrated kagome-
lattice metal CoSn, Nature Communications 11, 4002
(2020).
[9] Z. Liu, N. Zhao, M. Li, Q. Yin, Q. Wang, Z. Liu, D. Shen,
Y. Huang, H. Lei, K. Liu, and S. Wang, Electronic cor-
relation effects in the kagome magnet GdMn6 Sn6 , Phys.
Rev. B 104, 115122 (2021).
[10] G. Venturini, B. Chafik El Idrissi, and B. Malaman,
Magnetic properties of RMn6 Sn6 (R = Sc, Y, Gd-Tm,
Lu) compounds with HfFe6 Ge6 type structure, Journal
of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 94, 35 (1991).
[11] N. J. Ghimire, R. L. Dally, L. Poudel, D. C. Jones,
D. Michel, N. T. Magar, M. Bleuel, M. A. McGuire,
J. S. Jiang, J. F. Mitchell, J. W. Lynn, and I. I. Mazin,
Competing magnetic phases and fluctuation-driven scalar
spin chirality in the kagome metal YMn6 Sn6 , Science Ad-
vances 6, eabe2680 (2020).
[12] J.-X. Yin, W. Ma, T. A. Cochran, X. Xu, S. S. Zhang,
H.-J. Tien, N. Shumiya, G. Cheng, K. Jiang, B. Lian,
Z. Song, G. Chang, I. Belopolski, D. Multer, M. Litske-
vich, Z.-J. Cheng, X. P. Yang, B. Swidler, H. Zhou,
H. Lin, T. Neupert, Z. Wang, N. Yao, T.-R. Chang,
S. Jia, and M. Zahid Hasan, Quantum-limit Chern topo-
logical magnetism in TbMn6 Sn6 , Nature 583, 533 (2020).

[13] B. Malaman, G. Venturini, R. Welter, J. Sanchez, P. Vul-
liet, and E. Ressouche, Magnetic properties of RMn6 Sn6
(R=Gd-Er) compounds from neutron diffraction and
Mössbauer measurements, Journal of Magnetism and
Magnetic Materials 202, 519 (1999).
[14] X. Gu, C. Chen, W. S. Wei, L. L. Gao, J. Y. Liu,
X. Du, D. Pei, J. S. Zhou, R. Z. Xu, Z. X. Yin, W. X.
Zhao, Y. D. Li, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg,
D. Backes, L. S. I. Veiga, S. Dhesi, T. Hesjedal, G. van der
Laan, H. F. Du, W. J. Jiang, Y. P. Qi, G. Li, W. J.
Shi, Z. K. Liu, Y. L. Chen, and L. X. Yang, Robust
kagome electronic structure in the topological quantum
magnets XMn6 Sn6 (X = Dy, Tb, Gd, Y), Phys. Rev. B
105, 155108 (2022).
[15] G. Xu, B. Lian, and S.-C. Zhang, Intrinsic Quan-
tum Anomalous Hall Effect in the Kagome Lattice
Cs2 LiMn3 F12 , Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 186802 (2015).
[16] W. Ma, X. Xu, Z. Wang, H. Zhou, M. Marshall, Z. Qu,
W. Xie, and S. Jia, Anomalous Hall effect in the dis-
torted kagome magnets (Nd,Sm)Mn6 Sn6 , Phys. Rev. B
103, 235109 (2021).
[17] C. Q. Xu, T. W. Heitmann, H. Zhang, X. Xu, and
X. Ke, Magnetic phase transition, magnetoresistance,
and anomalous Hall effect in Ga-substituted YMn6 Sn6
with a ferromagnetic kagome lattice, Phys. Rev. B 104,
024413 (2021).
[18] X. Xu, J.-X. Yin, W. Ma, H.-J. Tien, X.-B. Qiang,
P. V. S. Reddy, H. Zhou, J. Shen, H.-Z. Lu, T.-R. Chang,
Z. Qu, and S. Jia, Topological charge-entropy scaling in
kagome Chern magnet TbMn6 Sn6 , Nature Communica-
tions 13, 1197 (2022).
[19] L. Gao, S. Shen, Q. Wang, W. Shi, Y. Zhao, C. Li,
W. Cao, C. Pei, J.-Y. Ge, G. Li, J. Li, Y. Chen, S. Yan,
and Y. Qi, Anomalous Hall effect in ferrimagnetic metal
RMn6 Sn6 (R = Tb, Dy, Ho) with clean Mn kagome lat-
tice, Applied Physics Letters 119, 092405 (2021).
[20] T. Asaba, S. M. Thomas, M. Curtis, J. D. Thompson,
E. D. Bauer, and F. Ronning, Anomalous Hall effect in
the kagome ferrimagnet GdMn6 Sn6 , Phys. Rev. B 101,
174415 (2020).
[21] G. Dhakal, F. Cheenicode Kabeer, A. K. Pathak,
F. Kabir, N. Poudel, R. Filippone, J. Casey, A. Prad-
han Sakhya, S. Regmi, C. Sims, K. Dimitri, P. Man-
frinetti, K. Gofryk, P. M. Oppeneer, and M. Neupane,
Anisotropically large anomalous and topological Hall ef-
fect in a kagome magnet, Phys. Rev. B 104, L161115
(2021).
[22] W. Ma, X. Xu, J.-X. Yin, H. Yang, H. Zhou, Z.-J. Cheng,
Y. Huang, Z. Qu, F. Wang, M. Z. Hasan, and S. Jia,
Rare Earth Engineering in RMn6 Sn6 (R = Gd−Tm,
Lu) Topological Kagome Magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126,
246602 (2021).
[23] F. D. M. Haldane, Model for a Quantum Hall Effect with-
out Landau Levels: Condensed-Matter Realization of the
”Parity Anomaly”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2015 (1988).
[24] C. Sims, Existence of Chern Gaps in Kagome Magnets
RMn6 Ge6 (R = Nd, Sm, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Yb, Lu),
arXiv:2203.09447.
[25] B. El Idrissi, G. Venturini, B. Malaman, and D. Fruchart,
Magnetic structures of TbMn6 Sn6 and HoMn6 Sn6 com-
pounds from neutron diffraction study, Journal of the
Less Common Metals 175, 143 (1991).
[26] See Supplemental Material for experimental details, ex-
tended data analysis, details on phonon and band struc-
6
ture calculations (see, also, references [52–61] therein).
[27] B. R. Ortiz, L. C. Gomes, J. R. Morey, M. Winiarski,
M. Bordelon, J. S. Mangum, I. W. H. Oswald,
J. A. Rodriguez-Rivera, J. R. Neilson, S. D. Wil-
son, E. Ertekin, T. M. McQueen, and E. S. To-
berer, New kagome prototype materials: discovery of
KV3 Sb5 , RbV3 Sb5 , and CsV3 Sb5 , Phys. Rev. Materials
3, 094407 (2019).
[28] T. Neupert, M. M. Denner, J.-X. Yin, R. Thomale, and
M. Z. Hasan, Charge order and superconductivity in
kagome materials, Nature Physics 18, 137 (2022).
[29] H. Zhang, J. Koo, C. Xu, M. Sretenovic, B. Yan, and
X. Ke, Exchange-biased topological transverse thermo-
electric effects in a Kagome ferrimagnet, Nature Com-
munications 13, 2041 (2022).
[30] Z.-J. Cheng, I. Belopolski, T. A. Cochran, H.-J. Tien,
X. P. Yang, W. Ma, J.-X. Yin, J. Zhang, C. Jozwiak,
A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, G. Cheng, M. S. Hos-
sain, Q. Zhang, N. Shumiya, D. Multer, M. Litske-
vich, Y. Jiang, N. Yao, B. Lian, G. Chang, S. Jia, T.-
R. Chang, and M. Z. Hasan, Magnetization-direction-
tunable kagome Weyl line, arXiv:2203.10648.
[31] S. Tabatabai Yazdi, N. Tajabor, M. Behdani, M. Rezaee
Roknabadi, D. Sanavi Khoshnoud, and F. Pourarian,
Magnetoelastic properties of GdMn6 Sn6 intermetallic
compound, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Mate-
rials 323, 2070 (2011).
[32] D. C. Jones, S. Das, H. Bhandari, X. Liu, P. Siegfried,
M. P. Ghimire, S. S. Tsirkin, I. I. Mazin, and
N. J. Ghimire, Origin of spin reorientation and intrin-
sic anomalous Hall effect in the kagome ferrimagnet
TbMn6 Sn6 , arXiv:2203.17246.
[33] C. Mielke III, W. L. Ma, V. Pomjakushin, O. Zaharko,
S. Sturniolo, X. Liu, V. Ukleev, J. S. White, J.-X. Yin,
S. S. Tsirkin, C. B. Larsen, T. A. Cochran, M. Medarde,
V. Porée, D. Das, R. Gupta, C. N. Wang, J. Chang, Z. Q.
Wang, R. Khasanov, T. Neupert, A. Amato, L. Libo-
rio, S. Jia, M. Z. Hasan, H. Luetkens, and Z. Guguchia,
Low-temperature magnetic crossover in the topological
kagome magnet TbMn6 Sn6 , Communications Physics 5,
2399 (2022).
[34] A. Biswas, O. Iakutkina, Q. Wang, H. C. Lei, M. Dressel,
and E. Uykur, Spin-Reorientation-Induced Band Gap in
Fe3 Sn2 : Optical Signatures of Weyl Nodes, Phys. Rev.
Lett. 125, 076403 (2020).
[35] F. Schilberth, N. Unglert, L. Prodan, F. Meggle,
J. Ebad Allah, C. A. Kuntscher, A. A. Tsirlin,
V. Tsurkan, J. Deisenhofer, L. Chioncel, I. Kézsmárki,
and S. Bordács, Magneto-optical detection of topological
contributions to the anomalous Hall effect in a kagome
ferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 106, 144404 (2022).
[36] M. Wenzel, B. R. Ortiz, S. D. Wilson, M. Dressel, A. A.
Tsirlin, and E. Uykur, Optical study of RbV3 Sb5 : Multi-
ple density-wave gaps and phonon anomalies, Phys. Rev.
B 105, 245123 (2022).
[37] E. Uykur, B. R. Ortiz, S. D. Wilson, M. Dressel, and
A. A. Tsirlin, Optical detection of the density-wave in-
stability in the kagome metal KV3 Sb5 , npj Quantum Ma-
terials 7, 16 (2022).
[38] E. Uykur, B. R. Ortiz, O. Iakutkina, M. Wenzel, S. D.
Wilson, M. Dressel, and A. A. Tsirlin, Low-energy optical
properties of the nonmagnetic kagome metal CsV3 Sb5 ,
Phys. Rev. B 104, 045130 (2021).
[39] N. Kumar, Y. Soh, Y. Wang, and Y. Xiong, Magneto-

transport as a diagnostic of spin reorientation: Kagome
ferromagnet as a case study, Phys. Rev. B 100, 214420
(2019).
[40] H. Luo, Q. Gao, H. Liu, Y. Gu, D. Wu, C. Yi, J. Jia,
S. Wu, X. Luo, Y. Xu, L. Zhao, Q. Wang, H. Mao, G. Liu,
Z. Zhu, Y. Shi, K. Jiang, J. Hu, Z. Xu, and X. J. Zhou,
Electronic nature of charge density wave and electron-
phonon coupling in kagome superconductor KV3 Sb5 , Na-
ture Communications 13, 273 (2022).
[41] Y. Zhong, S. Li, H. Liu, Y. Dong, Y. Arai, H. Li,
Y. Shi, Z. Wang, S. Shin, H. N. Lee, H. Miao,
T. Kondo, and K. Okazaki, Testing Electron-phonon
Coupling for the Superconductivity in Kagome Metal
CsV3 Sb5 , arXiv:2207.02407.
[42] J.-X. Yin, N. Shumiya, S. Mardanya, Q. Wang, S. S.
Zhang, H.-J. Tien, D. Multer, Y. Jiang, G. Cheng,
N. Yao, S. Wu, D. Wu, L. Deng, Z. Ye, R. He,
G. Chang, Z. Liu, K. Jiang, Z. Wang, T. Neupert,
A. Agarwal, T.-R. Chang, C.-W. Chu, H. Lei, and M. Z.
Hasan, Fermion–boson many-body interplay in a frus-
trated kagome paramagnet, Nature Communications 11,
273 (2020).
[43] S. X. M. Riberolles, T. J. Slade, D. L. Abernathy, G. E.
Granroth, B. Li, Y. Lee, P. C. Canfield, B. G. Ueland,
L. Ke, and R. J. McQueeney, Low-Temperature Compet-
ing Magnetic Energy Scales in the Topological Ferrimag-
net TbMn6 Sn6 , Phys. Rev. X 12, 021043 (2022).
[44] H. Zhang, X. Feng, T. Heitmann, A. I. Kolesnikov, M. B.
Stone, Y.-M. Lu, and X. Ke, Topological magnon bands
in a room-temperature kagome magnet, Phys. Rev. B
101, 100405 (2020).
[45] S. Fratini and S. Ciuchi, Displaced Drude peak and bad
metal from the interaction with slow fluctuations., Sci-
Post Phys. 11, 39 (2021).
[46] L. V. Delacrétaz, B. Goutéraux, S. A. Hartnoll, and
A. Karlsson, Bad Metals from Fluctuating Density
Waves, SciPost Phys. 3, 025 (2017).
[47] M. Petersen, J. Hafner, and M. Marsman, Structural,
electronic and magnetic properties of Gd investigated by
DFT + U methods: bulk, clean and H-covered (0001)
surfaces, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 18, 7021
(2006).
[48] P. Söderlind, P. E. A. Turchi, A. Landa, and V. Lordi,
Ground-state properties of rare-earth metals: an eval-
uation of density-functional theory, Journal of Physics:
Condensed Matter 26, 416001 (2014).
[49] Y. Lee, R. Skomski, X. Wang, P. P. Orth, A. K. Pathak,
B. N. Harmon, R. J. McQueeney, I. I. Mazin, and
L. Ke, Interplay between magnetism and band topology
in Kagome magnets RMn6 Sn6 , arXiv:2201.11265.
7
[50] Y. Shao, A. N. Rudenko, J. Hu, Z. Sun, Y. Zhu, S. Moon,
A. J. Millis, S. Yuan, A. I. Lichtenstein, D. Smirnov,
Z. Q. Mao, M. I. Katsnelson, and D. N. Basov, Electronic
correlations in nodal-line semimetals, Nature Physics 16,
273 (2020).
[51] M. M. Qazilbash, J. J. Hamlin, R. E. Baumbach,
L. Zhang, D. J. Singh, M. B. Maple, and D. N. Basov,
Electronic correlations in the iron pnictides, Nature
Physics 5, 273 (2009).
[52] S. Fratini, S. Ciuchi, and D. Mayou, Phenomenological
model for charge dynamics and optical response of dis-
ordered systems: Application to organic semiconductors,
Phys. Rev. B 89, 235201 (2014).
[53] J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized
Gradient Approximation Made Simple, Phys. Rev. Lett.
77, 3865 (1996).
[54] P. Blaha, K. Schwarz, G. Madsen, D. Kvasnicka, J. Luitz,
R. Laskowski, F. Tran, and L. Marks, WIEN2k, An Aug-
mented Plane Wave + Local Orbitals Program for Cal-
culating Crystal Properties (Karlheinz Schwarz, Techn.
Universität Wien, Austria), 2018. ISBN 3-9501031-1-2.
[55] Q. Wang, K. J. Neubauer, C. Duan, Q. Yin, S. Fujitsu,
H. Hosono, F. Ye, R. Zhang, S. Chi, K. Krycka, H. Lei,
and P. Dai, Field-induced topological Hall effect and
double-fan spin structure with a c-axis component in the
metallic kagome antiferromagnetic compound YMn6 Sn6 ,
Phys. Rev. B 103, 014416 (2021).
[56] D. Gorbunov, M. Kuz’min, K. Uhlı́řová, M. Žáček,
M. Richter, Y. Skourski, and A. Andreev, Magnetic prop-
erties of a gdmn6sn6 single crystal, Journal of Alloys and
Compounds 519, 47 (2012).
[57] C. C. Homes, M. Reedyk, D. A. Cradles, and T. Timusk,
Technique for measuring the reflectance of irregular,
submillimeter-sized samples, Appl. Opt. 32, 2976 (1993).
[58] D. B. Tanner, Use of x-ray scattering functions in
Kramers-Kronig analysis of reflectance, Phys. Rev. B 91,
035123 (2015).
[59] G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficiency of ab-initio total
energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using
a plane-wave basis set, Computational Materials Science
6, 15 (1996).
[60] G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative schemes
for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave
basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996).
[61] C. Ambrosch-Draxl and J. Sofo, Linear optical properties
of solids within the full-potential linearized augmented
planewave method, Comput. Phys. Commun. 175, 1
(2006).
 1

Supplemental Material for ”Effect of magnetism and phonons on localized carriers in

ferrimagnetic kagome metals GdMn6 Sn6 and TbMn6 Sn6 ”

M. Wenzel, A. A. Tsirlin, O. Iakutkina, Q. Yin, H.C. Lei, M. Dressel, and E. Uykur

I. CRYSTAL GROWTH

Single crystals of GdMn6 Sn6 and TbMn6 Sn6 were grown by the Sn flux method with Gd/Tb : Mn : Sn = 1 : 6 : 20
molar ratio. Gd/Tb (ingots), Mn (pieces) and Sn (grains) were put into an alumina crucible and sealed in a quartz
ampule under partial argon atmosphere. The sealed quartz ampule was heated up to 1373 K and kept there for 20 h
arXiv:2208.00756v2 [cond-mat.str-el] 21 Dec 2022

to ensure the homogeneity of melt. After that, for GdMn6 Sn6 , the temperature was rapidly cooled down to 1023 K
for 20 h and subsequently cooling down to 873 K at 2 K/h. For TbMn6 Sn6 , the temperature was cooled down directly
to 873 K with the rate of 5 K/h. Finally, the ampules were taken out of furnace and the single crystals were separated
from the flux by a centrifuge.

II. EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS

Prior to our optical study, we carried out four-point dc resistivity and magnetic susceptibility measurements within
the ab-plane to monitor possible magnetic transitions and confirm the stoichiometry. For the magnetic susceptibility
measurements, a small magnetic field of H = 0.1 T was applied. The obtained data agrees well with the literature
and confirms the spin reorientation in TbMn6 Sn6 around 310 K from the basal plane near to the c-axis [S1]. For
GdMn6 Sn6 , all magnetic transitions are above the measured temperature range; hence, we observed no anomalies in
our data [S2].
Freshly cleaved samples with the dimensions of 2 x 2 mm2 surface area and thickness of about 100 µm were used for
the optical study. Here, temperature-dependent reflectivity measurements were performed in the ab-plane covering
a broad frequency range from 50 to 18000 cm−1 (6.2 meV - 2.23 eV) down to 10 K, as shown in Fig. S1. For the
high-energy range (ω > 600 cm−1 ) a Bruker Vertex 80v spectrometer with an incorporated Hyperion IR microscope
was used, while the low-energy range was measured with a Bruker IFS113v spectrometer and a custom-built cryostat.
Freshly evaporated gold mirrors served as reference in these measurements. The absolute value of the reflectivity was
obtained by an in-situ gold-overcoating technique in the far-infrared range, as described in ref. [S3]
Considering the metallic nature of the samples, we used Hagen-Rubens extrapolation below 50 cm−1 , while x-ray
scattering functions were utilized for the high-energy range to extrapolate the data [S4]. The optical conductivity is
then calculated from the measured reflectivity by standard Kramers-Kronig analysis.

E n e rg y (e V ) E n e rg y (e V )
0 .0 1 0 .1 1 0 .0 1 0 .1 1

1 .0 (a ) (b )
E II a b E II a b

0 .9 1 0 K
5 0 K
1 0 0 K
R e fle c tiv ity

0 .8
1 5 0 K
1 7 5 K
0 .7
2 0 0 K
2 2 5 K
0 .6 2 5 0 K
2 7 5 K
0 .5 3 0 0 K G d M n 6S n 6
T b M n 6S n 6

1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
-1 -1
F re q u e n c y (c m ) F re q u e n c y (c m )

FIG. S1. Temperature-dependent reflectivity over a broad frequency range (50 to 18000 cm−1 ) measured in the ab-plane. The
dotted lines are the Hagen-Rubens extrapolations.
 2

III. DECOMPOSITION OF OPTICAL SPECTRA

Different contributions to the total optical conductivity were modeled with the Drude-Lorentz approach. With ε∞
being the high-energy contributions to the real part of the dielectric permittivity, the dielectric function [ε̃ = ε1 + iε2 ]
is expressed as
2
ωp,Drude X Ω2j
ε̃(ω) = ε∞ − + 2 . (S1)
ω 2 + iω/τ Drude j
ω0,j − ω 2 − iωγj

Here, ωp,Drude and 1/τ Drude are the plasma frequency and the scattering rate of the itinerant carriers, respectively.
The parameters ω0,j , Ωj , and γj describe the resonance frequency, width, and the strength of the j th excitation,
respectively.
Following the approach of previous optical studies of kagome metals, we base our analysis of the localization peak
on the displaced Drude formalism proposed in 2014 by Fratini et al. [S5]. Here, possible localization effects, due to
interactions of charge carriers with low-energy degrees of freedom, such as phonons, electric or magnetic fluctuations,
are considered by modifying the classical Drude response with an additional backscattering of the electrons. This

E n e rg y (e V ) E n e rg y (e V )
0 .0 1 0 .1 1 0 .0 1 0 .1 1

1 .0 (a ) 1 .0 (d )
R e fle c tiv ity

R e fle c tiv ity

1 .2 0 .8 1 .2 0 .8
0 .6 ) 0 .6
)

-1
-1

T = 2 0 0 K σ1 ( 1 0 4 Ω- 1 c m T = 2 0 0 K
σ1 ( 1 0 4 Ω- 1 c m

0 .4 0 .4
0 .8 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 .8 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
-1 -1
F re q u e n c y (c m ) F re q u e n c y (c m )

0 .4 0 .4

G d M n 6S n T b M n 6S n 6
6
0 .0 0 .0
1 .0 (b ) 1 .0 (e )
R e fle c tiv ity

R e fle c tiv ity

1 .2 0 .8 1 .2 0 .8
)
)

-1

0 .6 0 .6
-1

T = 1 0 0 K T = 1 0 0 K
σ1 ( 1 0 4 Ω- 1 c m
σ1 ( 1 0 4 Ω- 1 c m

0 .4 0 .4
0 .8 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 .8 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
-1 -1
F re q u e n c y (c m ) F re q u e n c y (c m )

0 .4 0 .4

G d M n 6S n 6
T b M n 6S n 6

0 .0 0 .0
1 .0 (c ) 1 .0 (f)
R e fle c tiv ity

R e fle c tiv ity

1 .2 0 .8 1 .2 0 .8
)
)

-1

0 .6 0 .6
-1

T = 1 0 K T = 1 0 K
σ1 ( 1 0 4 Ω- 1 c m
σ1 ( 1 0 4 Ω- 1 c m

0 .4 0 .4
0 .8 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 .8 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
-1 -1
F re q u e n c y (c m ) F re q u e n c y (c m )

0 .4 0 .4

G d M n 6S n 6
T b M n 6S n 6

0 .0 0 .0
1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
-1 -1
F re q u e n c y (c m ) F re q u e n c y (c m )

FIG. S2. Decomposed optical conductivity at 200 K, 100 K, and 10 K, consisting of a Drude component (purple), a localization
peak (blue), a phonon mode (green), and several interband transitions (orange) modeled with the Drude-Lorentz approach.
The insets show the total fit to the measured in-plane reflectivity.
 3

Lorentzian 1 GdMn6 Sn6 TbMn6 Sn6

−1 −1
T (K) ∆ε ω0 (cm ) γ (cm ) ∆ε ω0 (cm−1 ) γ (cm−1 )
10 172.705 432.556 651.473 909.009 332.377 682.769
50 148.140 432.556 619.329 850.895 332.377 758.926
100 156.009 432.556 660.067 760.626 332.377 899.605
150 198.806 432.556 853.54 865.581 332.377 807.755
175 189.058 432.556 901.554 - - -
200 202.635 432.556 767.635 1024.99 332.377 1041.35
225 215.642 432.556 1034.66 1050.23 332.377 982.126
250 192.204 432.556 1164.59 1180.61 332.377 1006.25
275 163.49 432.556 1105.97 1265.02 332.377 1002.79
300 206.121 432.556 1215.73 1251.79 332.377 1049.3
Lorentzian 2 GdMn6 Sn6 TbMn6 Sn6
−1 −1
T (K) ∆ε ω0 (cm ) γ (cm ) ∆ε ω0 (cm−1 ) γ (cm−1 )
10 95.7128 1698.15 2554.68 69.8246 1705.89 1924.48
50 99.9937 1698.15 2788.11 72.9802 1705.89 1985.85
100 100.325 1698.15 2776.85 76.0712 1705.89 2027.15
150 107.838 1698.15 2994.56 88.1694 1705.89 2441.02
175 110.115 1698.15 3048.64 - - -
200 113.452 1698.15 3017.55 98.043 1705.89 2775.34
225 108.198 1698.15 3016.64 103.049 1705.89 2831.12
250 126.412 1698.15 3437.89 93.1684 1705.89 2754.83
275 127.789 1698.15 3432.88 96.9267 1705.89 2883.27
300 121.526 1698.15 3432.53 100.372 1705.89 3007.04
Lorentzian 3 GdMn6 Sn6 TbMn6 Sn6
T (K) ∆ε ω0 (cm ) γ (cm ) ∆ε ω0 (cm−1 )
−1 −1
γ (cm−1 )
10 50.7642 6479.28 11939 74.6754 6338.93 12808.7
50 47.1342 6479.28 11939 75.5724 6338.93 12808.7
100 49.0074 6479.28 11939 76.3284 6338.93 12808.7
150 50.8744 6479.28 11939 76.336 6338.93 12808.7
175 50.9762 6479.28 11939 - - -
200 53.1189 6479.28 11939 77.1148 6338.93 12808.7
225 53.6501 6479.28 11939 78.7435 6338.93 12808.7
250 52.5772 6479.28 11939 76.814 6338.93 12808.7
275 53.1029 6479.28 11939 76.8908 6338.93 12808.7
300 55.8173 6479.28 11939 73.3722 6338.93 12808.7
Lorentzian 4 GdMn6 Sn6 TbMn6 Sn6
−1 −1
T (K) ∆ε ω0 (cm ) γ (cm ) ∆ε ω0 (cm−1 ) γ (cm−1 )
10 18.9776 31246.3 80843.9 19.2266 27418.1 61229.7
50 19.2876 31246.3 80843.9 19.0763 27418.1 61229.7
100 19.3669 31246.3 80843.9 18.9045 27418.1 61229.7
150 19.1541 31246.3 80843.9 19.0954 27418.1 61229.7
175 19.0385 31246.3 80843.9 - -
200 19.0366 31246.3 80843.9 18.7211 27418.1 61229.7
225 18.8462 31246.3 80843.9 18.9102 27418.1 61229.7
250 19.0347 31246.3 80843.9 18.7916 27418.1 61229.7
275 19.029 31246.3 80843.9 18.7916 27418.1 61229.7
300 19.2212 31246.3 80843.9 19.0186 27418.1 61229.7

TABLE I. Fit parameters of the total number of four Lorentzians used to model the interband optical transitions in GdMn6 Sn6
and TbMn6 Sn6 .

leads to a shift of the zero-frequency response to a finite value:

~ω  
C tanh{ 2kB T } 1 1
σ̃localization (ω) = · Re − . (S2)
τb − τ ~ω 1 − iωτ 1 − iωτb

Here, C is a constant, ~ is the reduced Planck constant, kB the Boltzmann constant, τb the backscattering time, and
 4

5 0 0 (a ) 8 0 (b ) (c ) 1 2 0 (d )
1 0 0
G d M n 6S n 6 1 2 0 6 0 0 T b M n 6S n
)

)
6
4 0 0
-1

-1
8 0

)
6 0

-1

-1
ρ ( µΩc m )
8 0

ρ ( µΩc m )
(c m

(c m
(c m

(c m
3 0 0
1 /τ 8 0 4 0 0 1 /τ 6 0
c a liz a tio n

c a liz a tio n
4 0

ru d e

ru d e
2 0 0 4 0
1 / τb 4 0

1 / τD

1 / τD
4 0 2 0 0 1 / τb
1 / τl o

1 / τl o
1 0 0 2 0
2 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0
T e m p e ra tu re (K ) T e m p e ra tu re (K ) T e m p e ra tu re (K ) T e m p e ra tu re (K )

FIG. S3. Elastic scattering rate, 1/τ (blue) and backscattering rate, 1/τb (red) of the Fratini model fits. Additionally, the
elastic scattering rate of the Drude contribution (green), overlaid with the dc resistivity (orange), is given.

τ the elastic scattering time of the standard Drude model.

The total dielectric permittivity takes the form

ε̃(ω) = ε̃Drude (ω) + ε̃Lorentz (ω) + ε̃localization (ω). (S3)

The complex optical conductivity [σ̃ = σ1 + iσ2 ] is then calculated as

σ̃(ω) = −iω[ε̃(ω) − ε∞ ]/4π. (S4)

Fig. S2 shows the decomposed optical conductivity at various temperatures. The spectra were fitted in a consistent
way for all temperatures using one Drude contribution (purple), a total number of four Lorentzians (see Table I for the
parameters) to describe the interband optical transitions (orange), a sharp Lorentzian for the phonon mode (green),
as well as the Fratini model to describe the localization peak (blue). At 300 K the localization peak is only weakly
pronounced and additionally screened by low-energy interband transitions in TbMn6 Sn6 . On the other hand, the
peak is clearly visible by the eye in the spectrum of GdMn6 Sn6 due to the absence of strong low-energy interband
absorptions and the sharper Drude contribution.
In Fig. S3, we show the elastic scattering rate and the backscattering rate obtained from the Fratini model fits to
the optical spectra, as well as the scattering rate of the classical Drude model. When overlaying the Drude scattering
rate with the dc resistivity, a remarkably similar temperature evolution is found in TbMn6 Sn6 , indicating that the dc
transport is governed by the free electrons. On the other hand, a clear deviation of this behavior above ∼ 200 K is
observed in GdMn6 Sn6 . Considering the akin temperature dependence of the resistivity to the elastic scattering rate
of the localization peak at high temperatures, this signals a significant contribution of the incoherent carriers to the
dc transport in GdMn6 Sn6 .

IV. PHONON CALCULATIONS

Phonon calculations were performed on the density-functional theory (DFT) level in VASP [S6, S7] using the refined
structural parameters given in Table II and the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) flavor of the exchange-correlation
potential [S8]. Spin-orbit coupling was included, and different directions of the magnetic moment were chosen.
Ferromagnetic order was introduced for Mn atoms, whereas f -electrons of Gd and Tb were placed into the core, and
only a small residual magnetic moment due to d-electrons appeared on these atoms. This simplification was necessary
in order to achieve good convergence of total energies and forces, as required in phonon calculations. The 8 × 8 × 4
k-mesh was used.
Frequencies of Γ-point phonons were obtained from the built-in procedure with frozen atomic displacements of
0.015 Å. Fig. S4 (a) and (b) depict the calculated IR-active phonon modes of GdMn6 Sn6 and TbMn6 Sn6 . In both
compounds, a total number of nine IR-active modes are expected, which do not significantly vary in frequency with
changes in the direction of the magnetic moments. Four of these are A2u c-axis modes (dashed lines) and hence,
cannot be observed in our in-plane measurements. The remaining five modes are E1u modes (solid lines) involving
in-plane atomic displacements. However, the appearance of phonon modes in reflectivity spectra strongly depends
on the intensity of the phonon mode, especially for highly metallic samples, as in the case of the ReMn6 Sn6 series.
Hence, it is possible that only the E1u mode around 160 cm−1 is strong enough to be captured by our measurements.
 5

GdMn6 Sn6 TbMn6 Sn6

a = b = 5.5399(2) Å, c = 9.0318(5) Å a = b = 5.5305(2) Å, c = 9.0223(5) Å
V = 240.054(18) Å3 V = 238.988(18) Å3
P6/mmm P6/mmm
λ = 0.71073 Å λ = 0.71073 Å
Θmin = 0.41◦ , Θmax = 27.48◦ Θmin = 0.41◦ , Θmax = 27.48◦
−7 ≤ h ≤ 7, −7 ≤ k ≤ 7, −11 ≤ l ≤ 11 −6 ≤ h ≤ 7, −7 ≤ k ≤ 7, −11 ≤ l ≤ 11
Rint = 0.0656 Rint = 0.0787
Atom x/a y/b z/c Uiso (Å2 ) Atom x/a y/b z/c Uiso (Å2 )
Gd 0 0 0.5 0.01120(34) Tb 0 0 0.5 0.01182(41)
Mn 0.5 0 0.25224(13) 0.01074(34) Mn 0.5 0 0.25244(16) 0.01129(42)
Sn1 13 2
3
0 0.01147(33) Sn1 31 2
3
0 0.01155(40)
1 2 1 2
Sn2 3 3
0.5 0.01024(33) Sn2 3 3
0.5 0.01078(40)
Sn3 0 0 0.16206(11) 0.01184(33) Sn3 0 0 0.16276(13) 0.01211(40)

TABLE II. Details of data collection and refined structural parameters for GdMn6 Sn6 (left) and TbMn6 Sn6 (right).

This mode can be represented with a sharp Lorentzian,

∆εω 2 ω02 γ
σ1 (ω) = . (S5)
4π[(ω 2 − ω02 )2 + γ 2 ω 2 ]

Here, ∆ε stands for the intensity, ω0 for the resonance frequency, and γ for the linewidth. Consistent with the
hardening of the lattice, we observe a slight blue shift of the mode upon cooling in both compounds. In GdMn6 Sn6 , a
significant enhancement of intensity and a slight broadening of the mode are observed as the localization peak crosses
the respective phonon mode. On the other hand, no such changes are observed in TbMn6 Sn6 . Here, both the intensity
as well as the linewidth stay constant within the error bars of our fits.

V. CALCULATION OF THE OPTICAL CONDUCTIVITY

DFT calculations of the band structure and optical conductivity were performed in the Wien2K code [S9] using
the same PBE functional [S8]. Spin-orbit coupling was included in all calculations. For a realistic implementation
of the magnetic structures, the [100]-direction of the magnetic moments was chosen for GdMn6 Sn6 , while the [001]-
direction was set for TbMn6 Sn6 . Additionally, an antiferromagnetic coupling between the Mn- and rare-earth-atoms
was implemented. Moreover, a Hubbard UGd/T b = 10 eV was added to the 4f shell of the rare-earth element using
the DFT+U method with the FLL (fully localized limit) double-counting correction to push the minority 4f states to
energies well above the Fermi level. DFT calculations were converged on the 15 × 15 × 4 k-mesh. Optical conductivity
was calculated within Wien2K [S10] on a denser 26 × 26 × 14 k-mesh.
Fig. S5 shows the calculated band structures along high-symmetry paths of the first Brillouin zone. Both compounds
possess flat bands around 0.5 eV and saddle points nearby the M point. The Dirac points nearby K are marked by
circles, and their energies are noted in Table III. In the case of a two-dimensional Dirac point, the optical conductivity
is supposed to show a sharp Drude component along with a step-like onset at 2|ED |, followed by a frequency-
independent behavior. Hence, the interpretation of the observed steps in the optical conductivity as the signature of
two-dimensional Dirac fermions is very tempting. The obtained Dirac cone energies from our experiment are noted in
Table III. A direct comparison with our calculations reveals a remarkable agreement of the determined energies. On
the other hand, a comparison with ARPES studies shows a larger deviation of the energies of the second Dirac point.
However, it should be noted that ARPES only probes the states below the Fermi energy leading to less accurately
determined values.
Despite the good agreement between the experiment and our calculations, the step-like absorption features shown
in Fig. S6 should be interpreted cautiously. A closer look at the calculated bandstructure reveals the large number
of bands crossing the Fermi energy in these compounds. Thus, the multi-band nature of the ReMn6 Sn6 series should
not be disregarded.
For TbMn6 Sn6 , the accuracy of the calculated optical conductivity in comparison with the experiment increases
when either shifting the Fermi energy down by 47 meV or adding a Hubbard UMn = 0.4 eV to the Mn-atoms. However,
 6

E n e rg y (e V )
0 .0 1 0 0 .0 1 5 0 .0 2 0 0 .0 2 5

G d M n 6S n E (a )
6
IR - a c tiv e p h o n o n m o d e s

1 u

A 2 u

T b M n 6S n (b )
6

6 0 8 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 4 0 1 6 0 1 8 0 2 0 0 2 2 0 2 4 0
-1
F re q u e n c y (c m )

(c ) 1 6 1 G d M n 6S n 1 4 (e )
6
6 0 T b M n 6S n 6 1 2
1 6 0
)

)
-1

-1
4 0 1 0
∆ε

ω0 ( c m

γ(c m
1 5 9
8
2 0 1 5 8 6
(d )
0 1 5 7 4
2 0 0 2 2 5 2 5 0 2 7 5 3 0 0 2 0 0 2 2 5 2 5 0 2 7 5 3 0 0 2 0 0 2 2 5 2 5 0 2 7 5 3 0 0
T e m p e ra tu re (K ) T e m p e ra tu re (K ) T e m p e ra tu re (K )

FIG. S4. (a) and (b) Calculated IR-active phonon frequencies of GdMn6 Sn6 and TbMn6 Sn6 . The solid lines represent the
in-plane E1u modes while dashed lines mark A2u modes involving atomic displacements along the c-axis.(c)-(e) Fit parameters
of the observed phonon mode in the optical spectra corresponding to the E1u mode marked by the red area in (a) and (b).

1 .0 1 .0
G d M n 6S n 6
T b M n 6S n 6

0 .5 0 .5
(e V )

(e V )

0 .0 0 .0
F

F
E - E

E - E

-0 .5 -0 .5
in itia l
U M n = 0 .4 e V
-1 .0 -1 .0
 M K   M K 

FIG. S5. DFT+U band structures for GdMn6 Sn6 (left) and TbMn6 Sn6 (right) shown along high-symmetry paths of the first
Brillouin zone. The observed Dirac points at the K point are marked with circles and their energies are noted in Table III.

in both cases, the energy of the first Dirac point shifts above the Fermi level, which is not expected from ARPES
studies on the ReMn6 Sn6 series.
 7

E n e rg y (e V ) E n e rg y (e V )
0 .4 0 .8 1 .2 1 .6 2 .0 0 .4 0 .8 1 .2 1 .6 2 .0
8 8
(a ) (b )
7 e x p e r im e n t a t 1 0 K 7
fit
6 6
s te p s
)

)
-1

-1
5 5
σ1 ( 1 0 3 Ω- 1 c m

σ1 ( 1 0 3 Ω- 1 c m
4 4
3 3
2 2
1 G d M n 6S n 1 T b M n 6S n
6 6

0 0
4 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
-1 -1
F re q u e n c y (c m ) F re q u e n c y (c m )

FIG. S6. Experimental optical conductivity after subtracting the localization peak and the low-energy interband transitions.
The remaining spectra resemble the optical conductivity of two-dimensional Dirac fermions. The steps at 2|ED | are highlighted
with dots.

optical study calculations ARPES estimates

ED1 (meV) ED2 (meV) ED1 (meV) ED2 (meV) ED1 (meV) ED2 (meV)
GdMn6 Sn6 63 291 - 42 233 - 42 [S11] 170 [S12]
TbMn6 Sn6 65 298 - 41 239 not reported 130 [S13]

TABLE III. Energies of the Dirac points obtained from the optical study at T = 10 K, the DFT+U calculations, and estimates
from ARPES measurements.

[S1] D. C. Jones, S. Das, H. Bhandari, X. Liu, P. Siegfried, M. P. Ghimire, S. S. Tsirkin, I. I. Mazin, and N. J. Ghimire,
Origin of spin reorientation and intrinsic anomalous Hall effect in the kagome ferrimagnet TbMn6 Sn6 , arXiv:2203.17246.
[S2] D. Gorbunov, M. Kuz’min, K. Uhlı́řová, M. Žáček, M. Richter, Y. Skourski, and A. Andreev, Magnetic properties of a
gdmn6sn6 single crystal, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 519, 47 (2012).
[S3] C. C. Homes, M. Reedyk, D. A. Cradles, and T. Timusk, Technique for measuring the reflectance of irregular,
submillimeter-sized samples, Appl. Opt. 32, 2976 (1993).
[S4] D. B. Tanner, Use of x-ray scattering functions in Kramers-Kronig analysis of reflectance, Phys. Rev. B 91, 035123 (2015).
[S5] S. Fratini, S. Ciuchi, and D. Mayou, Phenomenological model for charge dynamics and optical response of disordered
systems: Application to organic semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B 89, 235201 (2014).
[S6] G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a
plane-wave basis set, Computational Materials Science 6, 15 (1996).
[S7] G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis
set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996).
[S8] J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865
(1996).
[S9] P. Blaha, K. Schwarz, G. Madsen, D. Kvasnicka, J. Luitz, R. Laskowski, F. Tran, and L. Marks, WIEN2k, An Augmented
Plane Wave + Local Orbitals Program for Calculating Crystal Properties (Karlheinz Schwarz, Techn. Universität Wien,
Austria), 2018. ISBN 3-9501031-1-2.
[S10] C. Ambrosch-Draxl and J. Sofo, Linear optical properties of solids within the full-potential linearized augmented planewave
method, Comput. Phys. Commun. 175, 1 (2006).
[S11] Z. Liu, N. Zhao, M. Li, Q. Yin, Q. Wang, Z. Liu, D. Shen, Y. Huang, H. Lei, K. Liu, and S. Wang, Electronic correlation
effects in the kagome magnet GdMn6 Sn6 , Phys. Rev. B 104, 115122 (2021).
[S12] W. Ma, X. Xu, J.-X. Yin, H. Yang, H. Zhou, Z.-J. Cheng, Y. Huang, Z. Qu, F. Wang, M. Z. Hasan, and S. Jia, Rare
Earth Engineering in RMn6 Sn6 (R = Gd−Tm, Lu) Topological Kagome Magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 246602 (2021).
[S13] J.-X. Yin, W. Ma, T. A. Cochran, X. Xu, S. S. Zhang, H.-J. Tien, N. Shumiya, G. Cheng, K. Jiang, B. Lian, Z. Song,
G. Chang, I. Belopolski, D. Multer, M. Litskevich, Z.-J. Cheng, X. P. Yang, B. Swidler, H. Zhou, H. Lin, T. Neupert,
Z. Wang, N. Yao, T.-R. Chang, S. Jia, and M. Zahid Hasan, Quantum-limit Chern topological magnetism in TbMn6 Sn6 ,
 8

Nature 583, 533 (2020).