Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Proxy contest
Going private
Synergy
The whole is worth more than the sum of the parts
Some mergers create synergies because the firm
can either cut costs or use the combined assets
more effectively
This is generally a good reason for a merger
Examine whether the synergies create enough
benefit to justify the cost
Revenue Enhancement
Marketing gains
Advertising
Distribution network
Product mix
Strategic benefits
Market power
Cost Reductions
Economies of scale
Ability to produce larger quantities while reducing the average
per unit cost
Most common in industries that have high fixed costs
Economies of vertical integration
Coordinate operations more effectively
Reduced search cost for suppliers or customers
Complimentary resources
Reducing Capital Needs
A merger may reduce the required investment in
working capital and fixed assets relative to the two firms
operating separately
Firms may be able to manage existing assets more
effectively under one umbrella
Some assets may be sold if they are redundant in the
combined firm (this includes human capital as well)
EPS Growth
Mergers may create the appearance of growth in
earnings per share
If there are no synergies or other benefits to the merger,
then the growth in EPS is just an artifact of a larger firm
and is not true growth
In this case, the P/E ratio should fall because the
combined market value should not change
There is no free lunch
Diversification
Diversification, in and of itself, is not a good
reason for a merger
Stockholders can normally diversify their own
portfolio cheaper than a firm can diversify by
acquisition
Stockholder wealth may actually decrease after
the merger because the reduction in risk, in effect
transfers wealth from the stockholders to the
bondholders
Cash Acquisition
The NPV of a cash acquisition is
NPV = VB* – cash cost
Value of the combined firm is
VAB = VA + (VB* - cash cost)
Often, the entire NPV goes to the target firm
Remember that a zero-NPV investment is also
desirable
Stock Acquisition
Value of combined firm
VAB = VA + VB + V
Cost of acquisition
Depends on the number of shares given to the target
stockholders
Depends on the price of the combined firm’s stock after the
merger
Considerations when choosing between cash and stock
Sharing gains – target stockholders don’t participate in stock
price appreciation with a cash acquisition
Taxes – cash acquisitions are generally taxable
Control – cash acquisitions do not dilute control
NPV OF A MERGER
• Consideration (payment) from bidder firm to target firm can be ;
• (i) in cash
• (ii) in shares of bidder firm
• Whether to acquire or not, it depends on the NPV of the merger and the
market price of bidder shares after the merger
• Example: Suppose firm A (bidder) and firm B (target) has a pre (before)
merger market value of RM500 and RM100 respectively. Firm A has 25
shares outstanding and firm B has 10 shares. When they are merged, the
combined firm AB will have a market value of RM700 resulting in a
synergies of RM100. BOD of firm B requires payment of RM150. Would
firm A acquires firm B if the payments is in:
• a) cash b) shares
NPV of the merger NPV = V*B – Cost of Acquisition NPV = V*B – Actual Cost of Acquisition
(Co. A) = 200 – 150 = 200 – (7.5units x RM21.54)
= RM 50 = RM38.45
Premium Pm = cash payment – Value of Co. B Pm = (New MP – Old MP) x No. of C/S of
= 150 – 100 Co. A
= RM50 = (22 – 20) x 25 = RM50
Defensive Tactics
Corporate charter
Establishes conditions that allow for a takeover
Supermajority voting requirement
Targeted repurchase A.K.A. greenmail
Standstill agreements
Poison pills (share rights plans)
Leveraged buyouts
More (Colorful) Terms
Golden parachute
Poison put
Crown jewel
White knight
Lockup
Shark repellent
Bear hug
Fair price provision
Dual class capitalization
Countertender offer
Evidence on Acquisitions
Shareholders of target companies tend to earn excess returns in a
merger
Shareholders of target companies gain more in a tender offer than in a straight
merger
Target firm managers have a tendency to oppose mergers, thus driving up the
tender price
Shareholders of bidding firms earn a small excess return in a tender
offer, but none in a straight merger
Anticipated gains from mergers may not be achieved
Bidding firms are generally larger, so it takes a larger dollar gain to get the same
percentage gain
Management may not be acting in stockholders’ best interest
Takeover market may be competitive
Announcement may not contain new information about the bidding firm
Divestitures and Restructurings
Divestiture – company sells a piece of itself to another
company
Equity carve-out – company creates a new company out
of a subsidiary and then sells a minority interest to the
public through an IPO
Spin-off – company creates a new company out of a
subsidiary and distributes the shares of the new company
to the parent company’s stockholders
Split-up – company is split into two or more companies
and shares of all companies are distributed to the original
firm’s shareholders
Additional formula
Market value
VAB
VA
VB