Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LCI Team
The Civil Procedure Code, 1908, controls the civil procedure of courts in India. The
unified Code in civil court procedure has allowed several suits to stay for decades. In
most cases, the only need for the Judge is to record reasons in writing. Section 148 of
CPC gives power to the Court to enlarge the time fixed by it with regard to an act
prescribed or allowed by the CPC.
After the receipt of the summons, the defendant should appear before the Court either in
person or through an advocate on the date mentioned in the summons. If the statement
of defence is not filed within 30 days of receipt of the summons, the defendant can be
granted an extension but should not be later than 90 days from service of summons.
These timelines have not been held compulsory by the Supreme Court and, if sufficient
cause can be shown, courts may even extend the timelines.
1/5
If the defendant declines to accept service of summons or cannot be found, service may
be affected by attaching a copy of the summons on the outer door or another
conspicuous part of the house where the defendant lives, carries on business or works for
gain.If a defendant does not appear before the Court on the returnable date mentioned in
the summons, the Court may go on to hear the plaintiff and move to pronounce a
judgment in the non-appearance of the defendant.
The R.N. Jadi case mentioned that Order 8, Rule 1, modified by the 2002 CPC
amendment, mentioning a time limit of 90 days for filing a written statement, was directory
and not mandatory by quoting an earlier precedent. Explaining the statutory time limit of
90 days to file a written statement into a mere directory guideline reopened the flood-
gates of delay. Not filing a written statement in time is still a favourable strategy to delay a
civil suit in Indian Courts.
Delayed Justice
Any debateregarding the Indian legal system meets a big issue of delays in courts. The
government tries to have the best possible law they can, but if the management of a
statute’s legal remedies requires treacherous delays, the basic form and function of a
statute dies. Major reasons for the delay in judgements can include shortage of judges,
adequate infrastructure, lack of facilities for e-filings and live transcription,poor case
management, etc.
The Civil Procedure Codecontrols the process, and the courts can extend the timelines to
a certain extent. Parties cannot control the procedure or timetable. However, by way of an
amendment in the CPC, the Commercial Courts Act introduced Order 13A, which allows
parties to apply for a summary judgment at any stage before framing issues.
Case Law
The Apex court bench of judges Sanjay Kishan Kaul and R Subhash Reddy instructed
lawyers to restrict oral reasoning to 30 minutes and submission work on a law to three
pages. The Court gave this verdict on a petition filed by YatinNarendraOza, a veteran
lawyer from Gujarat who was removed from the designation of the senior advocate after
commencement of contempt affairs against him by the Gujarat High Court.
2/5
The Apex Court, in a judgement in Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.
v. CBI has stated that any order of stay on the civil or criminal proceedings will not go for
more than six months unless the extension is granted, and the trial court may go in the
case without waiting for sanction from the higher Court if the stay is not extended after
that.
Being a part of remedial measures, the Court, in this case, issued a few directions:
The Chief Justice of the High Court can make directions to the Registry in a case
where the judgment is kept reserved and is pronounced sometime later. A section
can be added in the judgment, on the first page, after the cause-title date of
reserving the judgment, and the date of pronouncing it, stated separately by the
concerned court officer.
That Chief Justice of the High Courts, on their administrative side, should ask the
Court Officers of the various Benches in the High Courts to furnish every month the
list of cases where the judgments reserved are not pronounced within the time of
that month.
After the closure of the arguments, the judgment is not pronounced in the period of
two months, and the concerned Chief Justice should draw the attention of the
Bench concerned to the pending matter.
When a judgment is not expressed within three months from the date of reserving
the judgment, any of the parties in the matter is permitted to file an application in the
High Court asking for early order. This application would be listed before the Bench
concerned within two days, excluding the intervening holidays.
If the judgment is not stated within a period of six months, any of the parties of the
said list should be entitled to move an application before the Chief Justice of the
High Court with a prayer to pull out the said case and to make it over to any other
Bench for fresh arguments.
3/5
possible. However, such an application can only be moved when the case is pending
before the Court for a sufficient amount of time. The stage of the case also matters a lot
as the application can only be moved when evidence has already been collected, cross-
examination has been done, and the case has reached its final argument stage.Article
227 of the Constitution of India expresses that every High Court should have command
over all the courts and tribunals in the territories regarding which it exercises jurisdiction
Conclusion
Every person wishes for a right to a speedy trial, and refusal to timely justice leads to no
justice. Pendency of cases for an extended time defeats the entire idea of justice and
loses people’s confidence within the judiciary. There are some cases that have been
pending in the Courts for more than ten or maybe 20 years. The alteration brought by the
Amendments in 1999 and 2002 to the CPC is fundamental in nature yet have sweeping
results in the working of Civil Courts in the nation if they’re properly followed. How long
should it take to eliminate a case depends upon the facts and circumstances of
every case. It is not suggested that justice is served quickly, but it should be with the
proper observation by following the procedures of the Code and disposing of the case by
the Judgesonly after considering the material evidence and due hearing in every case.
twi
tter
fac
eboo
4/5
ins
tagra
lin
kedi
yo
utub
wh
atsa
tel
egra
5/5