ADDIS ABABA CITY GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT PROGRAMS MANAGEMENT OFFICE (TPMO) GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT OF MEGENAGNA. 5B+G+) ADDIS. ABABA TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT CENTRE BUILDING FEBRUARY, 2019 ETHIOPIAN CONSTRUCTION DESIGN AND SUPERVISON WORKS CORPORATION GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION, GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING AND UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION DESIGN AND SUPERVISION WORKS SECTOR P.O. Box 2561, Ades Abb, Ethiopia Te. 251-11-661450146631890 Fx 251-1-6615371 mai wsralse(@telecomnetet eat EOD Oe 8) ing oO ng seISSUE AND REVISION RECORD | REV-DATE | opiciNaToR | CHECKER | APPROVER ‘AUTHORIZER GETINET M. & YOHANNES B. | a | FEBRUARY, ASHENAFI GEOTECHNICAL | | 2019 | a, INVESTIGATION | ASHENAFIT, [ibd 7 7 REPORT “This document hs been prepared forthe led project or named par theoot and should not be relied upon or sed for ey other project without an independent check being carried out as to its suitability and prior written authority of Pthiopian Construction Desiga ani Supervision Works Corporation being obiained. ECDSWC accepts no responsibilty or lability forthe consequence ofthis document being used for & purpose other than the purposes for which it was commissioned. Any person using or relying ‘on the dacument for such other purpose agrees, end will by such use or reliance be taken to confirm his agreement to indemnify ECDSWC for ail loss or damage resulting therefrom. ECDSWC accepts no responsibility or Liability for this document to any party other than the person by whom itwas commissioned. Enghsring and Uleryround constootion Design and Supervision Works SectorEthan Conenton Desien & Supenislon verks Corporation sosce0 CGeotocricl Investigation report TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. INTRODUCTION... 1.1 OvERvEW.. 1.2 wwesnenTon OMCTHES.. 1.3 ScoPE OF INVESTIGATION. 11.4 bwesncamiow Resounc 2 GEOLOGY 3, _ INVESTIGATION COMPONENTS AND PROCEDURES. 3,1 GeNenAl. 3.2 GEOTECNICAL CORE DRILLING. 3.3 STANOARO PENETRATION TEST (SPT). 3.4 SAMPUNG AND LABORATORY STUDY nnn 4, _ ENGINEERING CHARACTERIZATION 4.1 Overview. 4.2 MaTZRaL CLASS AND PROPERTIES 43 GROUND WateR CONOTION.. 10 4.4 BEARING CAPACITY en u 4.5, SESNIC COEFFCENT 4 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION. S.L.CONCLUSION.. 5.2 RECOMMENDATIONS. 6. REFERENCES. List of Tables Table 1. Coordinates and drilled depth of boreholes... 4 “Table 2. No- of collected samples and corresponding test quantities based on 38+G+19 building ..6 8 2 pane 1S sin Table 3. Summary of Laboratory test result ‘Tabie 4 Measured and adjusted SPT N-values,58+G+0..... Table 5 Estimated foundation soil alloweble bearing capacity using SPT data with isolated type foundation, SB+G+0.. soo Table 6 Bedrock acceleration ratio... 4 List of Figures Figure 1, Location map ofthe study project... at Figure 2, Seismic hazard map of Ethiopia (EBC! List of plates Plate 1, Identiffed GTL-1 in BH-3. Plate 2, Identified GTL-2 in BH-3. List of Annexes Gant oe copEopian Constucton Design & Suporision wetks Corporation 520610 (Geotechnical vestigation report 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Overview ‘The Geotechnical Investigation, Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Construction Design and Supervision Works Sector (GGUDSWS) of the Ethiopian Construction Design and Supervision Works Corporation (ECDSWC) has entered a contract agreement with Addis Ababa City Government Transport Programs Management office(TPMO) and carried out ‘geotechnical investigation for 3B+G+0 building, The project site is located in Addis Ababa, in the locality area known as Megenagna (Figure 1). The geotechnical investigation, conducted at the project site, has involved rotary core drilling, at 3 borehole locations for $B+G40 building, Standard Penetration ‘Testing (SPT) in boreholes, water level measuring, and collection of representative samples from soil, and laboratory tests on representative samples obtained from the field work. Information collected. from existing documents review and from current study were analyzed and interpreted to +haracterize the engineering performance of proposed construction site of the project. Lox Figure 1. Location map of the study project_Eiopian Construction Design & Supervision works Corporation sarcv0 Gootecnical Investigation report 1.2 Investigation Objectives ‘The geotechnical investigation of the project has been planned and implemented to meet the following major objectives: * Determine the type and extent of geological formations of the proposed building foundation site as per international standard; * Outline different geotechnical layers and determine the representative engineering properties of the layers constituting the sub-surface geology in relation to strength and structure characteristics; and © To forward suitable foundation type and depth recommendation with regard to investigation information evaluation, 1.3 Scope of Investigation ‘The Geotechnical investigation has addressed the following major scopes: * Geotechnical core drilling at 3 boreholes for SB+G+0 = Standard penetration testing on soil layers as appropriate; * Collection of representative soil samples and laboratory analysis for index and engineering property determination of foundation materials; Water level inspection * Geotechnical investigation report preparation 1.4 Investigation Resources Proper machineries and equipment were mobilized to the project site for conducting contracted field activities successfully. In addition to drilling rig and the drilling accessories, the dri ing crew was equipped with standardized in situ testing and sampling materials: Semi-automatic trip hammer for Standard Penetration Testing (SPT), and deep meter for water measuring, Chief drillers were in charge of the drilling operation, The overall geotechnical field work has been under taken by experienced engineering geologists in accordance to the technical and contract agreement requirements. Hand held GPS Garmin was used to position boreholes on actual ground based on provided borehole location coordinate information. geen tonne seer Worn, Fg Works * oy aaa sl 2[Eoplon Construction Dvign & Supervion works Corperation sBrG+0 Gzotechical mvestigaon ropert 2, GEOLOGY Addis Ababa city is situated in the westem margin of the Main Ethiopian Rift and represents, a transition zone between the Ethiopian Plateau and the rift with poorly defined escarpment. ‘The geology of Addis Ababa area is represented by four volcanic units dominated in the lower part by basaltic lava flows (Addis Ababa basalt), followed by a pyroclastic sequence, mainly represented by ignimbrites (Addis Ababa Ignimbrite), central composite voleanoes (Central Volcanoes unit) and their products, and finally small spatter cones and tava flows (Akai unit Addis Ababa basalt extensively crops out along Akaki, Kebena, and Dukem rivers at the east to southeastern part of Addis Ababa, and represents the oldest unit of the area. It consists of essentially sub-horizontal lava flows with thickness ranging from few meters up to 20m. Maximum exposed thickness was found enst of Addis Ababa, along the Kebena River. Addis ‘Ababa basalt is predominantly constituted by alkaline and olivine basalts with three main textural attributes, that is, porphyritic, aphyric, and sub-aphyric. ‘Addis Ababa Ignimbrite is exposed close to Addis Ababa along the Akaki and Kebena rivers. It overlies the Addis Ababa basalt and locally covers the products of the composite central voleanoes of Wechecha and Furi. ‘The sequence is constituted by different flow units, consisting of pale-green to palc-yellow welded and crystal rich ignimbrites. Central voleanoes unit includes the Yerer volcano and the product of the two composite Wechecha and Furi voleanoes west and southeast of Addis Ababa, respectively. Wechecha and Furi voleanoes are two large edifices composed by predominant trachyte with minor pyroclasties, Yerer represents the largest voleanic edifice in the region, with a relief of 1000m from the plain and 14km wide along east-west direction. Products mainly consist of trachytes, even if pyroclastics are widespread mainly in the central part eastern sector. The highest part of Yerer volcano was affected by a more recent volcanic activity that produces spatter cones and associated basalt. Akai unit crops out east of Addis Ababa and consists of scoria and spatter cones with associated tabular lava flows and phreato- magmatic deposits. Alluvial deposits covering these units consists of regolith, reddish brown soils, talus and alluvium with maximum thickness of about two meters. ‘The proposed foundation material consists of silty clay- ignimbrite rock-silty clay inter layer. ‘The Ignimbrite rock has a maximum of I1m thickness. iit, ae, Po usséo oEbopan Consrucion Design & Superson works Coxpraon sasc10 CGostecrical investigaon rapt 3, INVESTIGATION COMPONENTS AND PROCEDURES 3.1 General ‘The investigation has covered geotechnical core drilling, in-situ testing, water level measuring, sampling and laboratory testing activities, ‘The activities were carried out in accordance with project scope and following standard procedures. 3.2 Geotechnieal Core Drilling Geotechnical core drilling of the current project is associated with such purposes as: obtaining subsurface material stratification to reasonable depths to obtain samples of subsurface materials for direct physical examination and laboratory studies, and to assess ‘groundwater condition of the site, For the current project, 2 boreholes were drilled. Accordingly, a total depth of 81.0m core drilling has been carried out for the project inves Table 4. Coordinates and drilled depth of boreholes SBIGH) Easting Northing pane depth @ m) © 77968 396833 ZH area | 968s a ~~ ar9s2 996877 27 “otal depth (r) 81 ‘The Geotechnical Core Drilling was conducted in accordance with ASTM D2113-99: Standard Practice for Rock Core Drilling and Sampling of Rock for site investigation, by using rotary core drilling method. Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) were carried out in boreholes as appropriate. Geological and engineering geological information were collected from the drill cores and recorded with appropriate log formats for each borehole (Annex-1). Furthermore, drill core samples were photographed as preserved in core boxes (Annex-4),Ehianan Genstuaion Dewan & Supervision wrks Corazon 581610 caloric iryeatoton rope. 3.3 Standard Penetration Test (SPT) ‘The Standard Penetration Test (SPT) wes conducted for soil portion intercepted in boreholes, Standard SPT hammer with semi-automatic tip hammer release mechanism and imparting 55% hammer efficiency was used for the testing at all times. Regular Standard Penetration tests (SPT) were generally undertaken starting from depth of 1.5 meters. ‘The regular testing interval for a particular soil zone was kept 1.5-3.0 meters, Sampler tube was in use during the operation, and disturbed samples recovered from the testing sampler tube were examined, ‘The measured field penetration resistance/ number of blow counts (N) was considered for the number of blows required for the last 36 em penetration of SPT rod in to the soil stratum. ‘The measured penetration resistance (N) could not be directly used for further geotechnical evaluations as the theoretical input energy is believed to be affected by several factors. The hammer efficiency, diameter of borehole, drill rod length, the type of sampler involved, and the over burden pressure are known factors to be considered in the approximation of the amount of energy which is transferred to the actual penetration driving energy. The SPT is considered to be standard to the energy ratio Er= 70%, Where Er =( actual hammer energy to sampler; Ba/ Input energy, Ein) x 100 ‘The standard blow count is adjusted by correcting the N/300mm -values to the hammer type (01) the rod length (g2), the sampler (gs), the B.H. diameter (q)s, and the overburden pressure (Cy) of the foundation level as: Noo Cu x (N/300mm) x prxnaensxys Where: Cy = (p"o/p'o) °5 = (95, 76kPa/yD)* = Unit weight of the soil D=Footing level of the foundation Hammer type (9;) =0.786 Rod length (g2) correction: if 0-4m= 0.75 4-6m=0.85 ar 95, >L0FL Sampler correction (92): Without liner=1 With liner, dense sand, clay= 0.8 sata ung Merk fsBiogen Construction Design & Supersion works Corporation s0sc+0 {Geotechnical Investigation report Loose sand=0.9 BH. diameter correction (94): 1f60-120mm=1 150mm 05 200mm=1.15 ‘The average N'yo-values in the zone of interest between 1/2B above and 2B below the footing depth will be considered in the computation of bearing capacity. 3.4 Sampling and Laboratory Study Soil and rock samples were collected during the field geotechnical investigation works from the core drilling and SPT recovery. Required index and engineering laboratory tests were performed on samples collected from the field work, The tests were carried out in Bthiopi Construction Design and Supervision Works Corporation Laboratory Services and Research Centre, Table 2. No. of collected samples and corresponding test quantities based on SB+G+0 building Soil Laboratory Test cin] Nett | tes | spect] vie | Die So" mote Mists? | Savy | wet | Shor ee consolidation | Direct shear a i Rode Leb Te Seite | Us | i rintoates | Se | Us vcs | wer dnt asia ESTED iEiopien Constructon Design & Supervision works Corportin susceo Geotectrcal investgston report 4, ENGINEERING CHARACTERIZATION 4.1 Overview ‘The project construction site is required to be characterized for material class, representative index and engineering properties, and suitability/associating geotechnical problems with respect to the purpose planned. The geotechnical characterization has made its basis on desk review, field work and laboratory test outcomes, and existing technical standards and practical experiences. 4.2 Material Class and Properties The geotechnical core drilling recoveries from 7 boreholes intercepted soil and rock layers that compose the proposed construction site. The project site is dominantly made up of silty clay-ignimbrite rock-silty clay intercalation, Based on their mode of occurrence and properties, the foundation materials are characterized and subdivided into the following geotechnical layers, ‘The engineering characteristic of the subsurface units described above are further detailed below based on the result of in-situ and laboratory tests. GTL-A: Stiff to very stiff grey silty clay silty In the $B+G+0 it is found in BH-1:0-13m,BH-2:0-9.00m and BH-3:0-7,5m.It generally has a stiff consistency. Its Id SPT N- value range from 6 to greater than 50. This geotechnical layer changes with depth to decomposed unit with gravel inclusions. GTL-2: Greyish moderately hard, moderately weathered and fractured ignimbrite. In the SB+G+0 it is found in BH-1:13-20.00m,BH-2:9.00-20.5m and BH-3:7.5-18.6m.For runs that has RQD, values range from very poor(3%) to excellent(100%),Unconfined compressive strength of the rock range from 19Mpa to 69Mpa. GTL-3: Brownish very stiff to hard silty clay with some sand In the SB+G+0 it is found in BH-1:20.00-27.00m,BH-2:20.5-27.5m and BH-3:18.6- 27,00m.This geotechnical layer is generally harder than the upper silty clay unit, Its field N- value range from 18 to greater than 50,Eopian Contruon Design & Supervision werks Corporation 594610 octechncal inestigaton report Table 3, Summary of Laboratory test result Tt NMCC%) ASTM | 21.61 4133 40.33 3441 21.50 D226 [Specie Gravy ASTM | 2.72 235 267 267 259 D854 3 [Freeway | Gir @ | G.00 50.00 75.00 75.00 30.00 Wotte ssa. | Aaterberg Limit Liauid Limits astm | 50.85 4920 nas 46.00 Plastic Limit% Das 33.58 36.99 49.17 35.09 Plasto Index’ 1721 12.12 21.68 1091 3) Grain Sue Anas Fines% astm | 94.91 86.40, 93.63, 82.30 Sand % paz | 493 13.39 5.89 1761 Gravel % 017, o2t ost 0.10 No | Tests Tests | mea rey BS DHS methods | 2471 46m 2.6m 24m LabNo: | LabNo: Lab No: Lab No: at sit 7M B/lt <—RMC Er mM_| 15.80 2035 3751 D216 7 [Specific Gavigy | ASTM | 250 282 233 28 235 8st I Wreeswelay | Gibbr | 35.00 20.00 35:00 35.00 40.00 Tlie (1956) 9 | Rtierbere bi Lig ASTM: | 53.45 42.52 61.50 44.82 33.45 Plastic Limit’ | DANS | 36.38, 26.22 4413 32.35 36.48 Plastic Index 17.07 1630 W731 12.47 16.97 TO | Grain Size Analyois Finest ast | 75.20 7699 91.70 8.19 97.78 Sand % pan | 2432 22.14 2.30 16.1 7.85 aa 048, 087 0.00 070 0.40 TT | Direst Shear (uPay astm | 4033 41.00 5967 49.00 54.00 oo 3080) 1852 20.05, 19.29 2.78 19.54 we fe or Works ——— a OL‘2hoplan Consteon Dasgn & Supervision werk Corporation 58.640 Geotechnical Investigation report : eck TR Reals ‘ tet mcd Pea fa | 0) Fete | pethods:| 19.5820.0m | 158-160m.|-13,6-14.0m | 180-18.30m | 31.8-12,10m ‘LabNo: | Lab Ne LabNoy | Lab No: Tab Noy tw | asin | toa | 178 18 Unit Weight) ASTM | 223 : 229 : 236 : Gee) pres 2 | UCKMPs) ASTM | 1934 35.56 42.48 21.08 35.32 837 02938 BH ‘Geotechinical vestigation of SBFGHO Plate 4. Identified GTL-1 in BH-3s8+640 EtNopian Construction Design & Supervision works Corportion Geotectricaliessigaton roport Geotechinical investigation of SB4G+0 BHS Plate 2. Identified GTL-2 in BH-3 4.3 Ground Water Condition Ground water level inspection after three days of drilling indicates there is no groundwater ‘encountered in all drilled boreholes. Variation in the location of the long-ierm water table may occur as a result of changes in precipitation, evaporation, seepage and other factors not, immediately apparent at the time of the exploration.Eplen Costus Design & Supervision wotks Corporation 524640 Goctecrical Investigation root 4.4 Bearing Capacity 4.4.1. General ‘The choice of # particular type of foundation depends on the magnitude of the structural loads, the nature of the subsurface strata, the type of the superstructure and its specific requirements, In terms of their seating depths within subsurface these are normally categorized as shallow and deep foundations. For reasons of economy, shallow foundation is in the priority choice of a foundation unless it is considered inadequate, The allowable bearing pressure is the maximum net intensity of loading that can be imposed con the soil with no possibility of shear failure or the possibility of excessive settlement, It is hence the smaller of the net safe bearing capacity (shear failure criterion) and the safe bearing, pressure (settlement criterion) that should be considered. As a result of this and considering, the materials properties of the project site, the foundation condition is analyzed taking into ccount the strength and settlement characteristi 4.4.2. Foundation Soil Bearing capacity ‘The soil bearing capacity is estimated using SPT data according to Meyerhof (rewritten by bowles) a) Using SPT data For isolated foundation system ‘The bearing capacity of foundations from SPT data according to Meyethof (rewritten by bowles) is as follows (Bowles, 1997): ta = BK, BsFs | | qu=(N/0.08)*Ka_ for mat foundation. Ginko 26 MiraeEllon Construction Dian & Suporision works Corsraton 58410 Gootechasal nvoetigson pert where qq = allowable beating pressure for AM, = 25-mm or 1-in, settlement, kPa or ksf Ka = 1 + 0.339 = 1,33 [as suggested by Meyerhof (1965)] Nes Nv F 0.05 | 0.04 Fy 0.08 | 0.06 5 03. 0.3 Fi 12 12 Table 4 Measured and adjusted SPT N-values,SB-+G+0 Testng Rod yy BH] doo | Ns torah} nv | mw | om | ne fear Nes| Cy | Noa 1 2 sa [38 [or9 [ors [Th 779] 1.00 1 a @_ | 56 [ow [oss [i [a 3002] 126) a [es foe [8 [ow [os [i 2380] 0.98) 1 [3% fo [5 [ow] 1 [a fo 14| 0.65] 9041 a 100} to000] 2080] ovo] a] | __t| srl 056) a[aaoof soo] aso] ove] a] | _—t|—at.to| 082) a[__2600) coco] zoo] ove] 1] 4] 1] 2001] 0.50) Teaihg |= y y BH | dept | Ns [tena cor. Ni | Ge | Nsw 2 | 2 10 | 36 5.53] _ 1.09 2 | 4 za | 86 206] 1.26] 2{[ 6 0 | 76 seri] 1.03] 2 [2 | 10 | 25 67.62| _073| 9068 2 78.00] 0000] 19.80] -47.05{ 0.60] 2 22.20| 50.00) 25.70 2r.te| 064] z 2400] 50.00] _ 25.50] 022 Tear ] Rad it} BH | depth | Ns [length | ny se | mm oon | Gy | Bs a | 2 so [35 [or [ors [1 [1 6.93] _ 1.09 3 [4 ay s8 [ors [oss [rT 77.81] 126| 3 [6 [7s [or [09s [1 72.58] 1.03] 3 [0 [wo [5 [ow] 1 [1 | a e2.t2| ao] 2895 3 16.00] 0000] vzso] oval a| 1] 1 40.00 _ 0.60 3 zo4o| 4300] 21.00] ara! 1] _a|__t}— taco] _aso| 3 2260| 50.00] 2400] oval | —|_—t)—at.oa| oss] af zaaf sof 25.8] ovo] i] a]_—t—ezs] ost After adjusting the N-values, a design N-values are chosen from consecutive depths where the test is performed. The design N-values are taken as the average of adjusted N-valuesEloplen Constusion Design & Supordeion works Corparaton suscs0 Gaoiechnica vestigation rapert which ate found in between 4 B above and 2B below the proposed footing depths where B is the width of the foundation, \ SHEE ! No. corr | Dim) Bim) Ka ga(kpa),25 mm set. 7 [reaat fp 16.00 z is 584 ; [0.44 [16.00 A 138 508 i tf soar [16.00 8 1.38 587 4} sor [15.00 7 rr 580 \ 7 s0.41 [18.00 3 138 Baa | BH. N'SS , No. corr | Dim) B(m) Ka da(kpa).25 mm set. fo soee 15.00 a ia 580 1 2 30.66 15.00 is 1.33. 573 2 [730.66 | 16.00 5 15 502 2 [30.66 [16.00 7 438 584 ' 2 [3008 [16.00 3 125 549 } ; BA] NB No. cor _| O(m) Bim) Ka gax(kpa),25 mm set. i 3 26.95 15.00 4 1.33, 518 3 26.95. 15.00 5 4.33 503 a [898 [18.00 8 138 404 3 26.95 145.00 He 4.33 487 3 [28 95 [16.00 8 139 rH Table 5. Estimated foundation soil allowable bearing capacity using SPT data with isolated type foundation, SB+G+0 CeEBiopian Consructon Design & Supervision works Corporation sarGv0 Geotechnical vestigation repcet 4.5. Seismic coefficient Seismicity at project area would has its origin from the development of the Ethiopian rift system. According to Ethiopian building code standard based on Euro norms ES EN 1998:2015, the project area (Figure 2) is located within seismic Zone-3. The adopted standard stipulated the design bedrock acceleration to the corresponding zone as 0.10 (Table 6). Table 6 bedrock acceleration ratio (ES EN 1998-1:2014) Zone 5 4 3 2 1 9 G 0.20 OS 0.10 0.07 0.04 Figure 2. Seismic hazard map of Ethiopia (EBCS-1996) in terms of peak ground accelerationEblpian Construction Design & Supervision vtks Corparatin saeco Geotectrea vestigation reset 5. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION 5.1 CONCLUSION Geotechnical investigation, conducted for the planned SB+G+0 site, has involved geotechnical core drilling, in-situ testing, and laboratory test of representative soil and rock samples obtained from the field work, Information collected from all sources of the study were analyzed and interpreted and used for the geotechnical characterization of the proposed project construction site. Generally, the following constitute main disclose points from the current investigat 1. The project area, within investigation depth, comprises of three geotechnical layers: generally stiff silty clay, ignimbrite rock and stiff to hard silly clay. The Ignimbrite rock is moderately weathered and moderately fractured with unconfined compressive strength of 19-69 Mpa. The upper silty clay layer is low to high plastic silt and the lower silty clay is low to high plastic clay. 2, There is no groundwater encountered in all boreholes. 3. The project area is located within seismic Zone-3, The adopted standard stipulated the design bedrock acceleration to the corresponding zone as 0.10. 5.2 RECOMMENDATIONS Regardless of footing dimensions, the following preliminary foundation recommendation is forwarded 1 The SB+-G+0 building can be supported with isolated footing at 15m depth with allowable bearing capacity of 482kpa. As general remark, the following points are recommended for consideration during design ‘and construction of the foundati n "It is recommended to perform construction during dry season which would make the excavation work easier and also helps to place the foundation on a dry and stable ground condition. * Leaving the foundation excavation open for too long time may weaken the soil at foundation level and is not advisable.tNoplen Construction Design & Supervision works Corporation 84640 {Goetocrical Investigation roport * ‘The construction of the substructure should be done immediately upon the completion of excavation so that the stress released due to removal of the over burden pressure should be compensated by the structural load. * Borehole drilling at the building site shows soil/ock profile at the drilled point that represents average site condition and hence local variation in soil type and engineering property is a possibility. So during foundation excavation, supervision has to be carried out by experienced geotechnical engineerfengineecring geologist in order to compare difference between geological log presented in the soil investigation report and observation during excavation work and make the necessary adjustment in the recommendation if deemed necessary."Eoplan Contruston Deen & Supervision works Corporation sBsc+0 Geotechrica vestiaton report REFERENCES Bieniawski, Z.7. (1989). Engineering Rock Mass Classifications, Wiley, New York, p., 251 Bowles, J. E. (1997), Foundation Design and Analysis, Sth ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 263pp. BS 5930 (1999). Code of Practice for Site Investigations. British Standards Institution (BS}). London. EBCS-7(1995). Ethiopian building code standard ISRM(1995), International Society of rock mechanics IAEG(1978), Intemational Association of Engineering Geologists PLE. Tegegn 2012,Physico-Chemical pollution, pattern in Akaki river basin, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.ANNEX-1: CORE LOGANNEX-2: LABORATORY TEST DATA‘Bihloplan Construction Dosign & ‘Suporviston Works Corporation Rosoarch, Laboratory & Training Centor Laboratory Testing Process jel ort6- 61 4501 / 0116-61 OF 05; Fax. 281-1165 55 53 THO 08 98; email w.d.s.c@ethionst at ;P.0.80% 1 : a ~ [ea eT | Page| . OFIRLTCI602 No, Geotechnical Laboratory Report _ | [rat bos 41-1944 Client Ref mitted by:- GGEDSWS Date Received: 5107/2018 Project:- Geotechnical Investigation of 58+G+0 Traffle Management Centor Building ea MEGENAGNA ie 7 st Roquestod:- NMC, SG, Free Swell, Atterberd Limit, Steve Analysis and Direct Shear loported to:- GGEDSWS Reported on:- 17/72018 a -p2aie_|_— at specie Graity [ASTM | 2-72 i _| oss ath Ee J | reeswell Garo’ & | 60.00 $0.00 75.00 75.00 30.00 Holtz | 950. | = 7 Averberg Cine | ] Liquid Limit% ASTM | $0.85 49.20 65,00 nas | 46.00 Plastic Limit’ pasts | 35.58 36.99 37.89 49.71 35.09 _| plastic Index _ ai au 22 1.68 191} ‘Grain Sie Analysis Fines% astm | 9491 86.40 7842 93.63 82.30 sand% pan | 493 1339 21.34 5.89 1761 Gyvel % He ou17 on 024 ast _0.10 | Direst Shear equa) ASTM | 6400 47133 61.50 65.00 48.67 2 3080 | 14.57 21.80 18.00 1404 15.91 REMARK: eis collected and submitted 0 ‘ H Reported by. Checked by i by { Fiud | ‘Geotechnical Engineer Senior Geotocnni nical Lab S/P Manager i °Spesiie Gravity ast | 2.59 233 D854 Bt Fresswal) Gibo™ | 35.00 35.00 40.00 cs Holtz ‘Aitrborg Lint Liguid Limit ASTM | 53.45 61.50 53.45 Plastic Limi DAIS | 36.38 44.13 36.48 Plastic Index%, 12.07 113 16.97 ‘Grain Size Analysis Fines% astm | 75.20 97.70 91.15 Sand % pm | 24.32 2.30 785 Gravel % 0.48 0.00 0.40 Direct Shear equray ASTM | 40,33 59.67 54.00 ot) 3080 | 18.52 19.29 19.54 13 | Unit Weight ASTM. | ee) 1263 is | TCS (IPAY ‘ASTM 2.08 6.37 2938 REMARK: The sample is Reported by. Geotechnical Engineer ‘Amang the major services rendered by the Geotechnical and. Design & Supervision Works Corporation are: ‘+ In Geotechnical Laboratory~Testing the engineering prop + In Material Testing Laboratory:- Testin tes, Asphatis/Bitumon/, Cements, Ro Ties Asphalt & Concrete Coro Tests, Concrete Mix Designs, ‘materials, and 0 on. 1g the engineering propertios of various Const ks, Water, Reinforcement steel bars, Hollow’ “Asphalt Mix Designs, Samplingrof 2 fA ‘onterias, 5 feral, SlTARR CMH UB Orc POPE pcre POPC! ANeRes hams “Ona Ethiopian Construction Design & Supervision Works Corporation Research, Laboratory and Training Center clea abt St ‘Geotectinical, Center Building I i I I i i I i fron by rocessed TPMO Location: © MEGENAGNA Test Type : Grain Size analysis iT.Pit. No. BHA Date : 15/7/2018 Depth(m): 33m Lab No:/11 Total mass af sample before wash, 2 156.14 Total mass of sample after wash, g 7.95. Tiere] Mass of | Mass ofsteve+ | Mass of | Percentage | Cumulative | Percentage LOpening(mm) | Sieve(e) | _Ret.soil(g) | Ret. soit(g) | Retained | % Retained | Passing 75.90| 1800.00 7800.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 700.00 50.00 1203.50) 1203.50 0,00. 0.00 9,00 100.00 37.50] 1087.80 1087.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 700.00 25.00] 1191.20 1191.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 700.00 1s00|__ 718.50 718.50 0.06 0.00 0.00 700.00 C 150 586.10 586,10. 0.00 0.00 0.00 109.00. i 9.50| 598.40. 598.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 700.00 ATS. 57810 578.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 2,36) 533.00 533.26 0.26! O17 O17 99.83 2.00| 551.10 35110 0.00 0.00 O17 99.83 L 118 538.90 540.62. 172. 110 1.27 98.73 t 0.60)” 516.70 3518.80 210 134 2.61 97.39 0,30 488.20 489.64 144 0.92. 354 96.46 01S 481.90 483.24 134 0.86 4,39. 95.61 t 0.08. 459.20 460,29 1.09 0.70. 3.09. DAIL PAN| 425.50 373.69 TABI9 94.91 100.00 156.14 oraps oped SON Checked by Approved by 5S va Stop nsets)DRAKE CITC AL OTCIICY PEPE NCP AAT PORES ANCHE HAMs oTONA Ethiopian Construction Design & Supervision Works Corporation Research, Laboratory and Training Center Project ‘Traffic Management Center Building Client : TPMO Location : MEGENAGNA, Test Type : Grain Size analysis ‘T.Pit. No. BHI Date : 15/7/2018 Depth(m): 3.5m Lab No:4/11 c Grain Size Distribution Curve 0000 “+ eee - WTI sooo |} tt PL A | 20.00 {|} --| Eee 0.00 ‘900.000 10.000 Gravel Tested by Processed b}ORAPAS Chichi Ane ATCA PEPE bret | PCPCI ANeHes hams sna 7 Ethiopian Construction Design & Supervision Works Corporation | Research, beat and Training Center | Project Geoiecrnical Investigation of 6B+G+0 Trafic Management Center Building Client + TPMO: Location: | MEGENAGNA Test Type : Grain Size analysis T.Pit. No. BHA Date : 15/7/2018 Depth(m): — 23.0 ‘Lab No: 5/11 Total mass of sample before wash, 12285 x Total mass of sample after wash, g 16.71 | Sleve ‘Mass of | Mass of sieve + Mass of Percentage | Cumulative | Percentage | | Openinermm) | Sievetg) | Ret soil(g) | Ret soil (g) | Retained | % Retained | Passing 75.00 1800.00 1800.00 0.00. 0.00 0.00. 100.00. | 50.00| 1203.50 1203.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 ] 37.50| 1087.80 1087.80 0.00 0.00 9.00 100.00. 45.00 1191.20 1191.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 I 19.00| 718.50 718.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 12.50| ° 586.10 58610 0.00 0.00 9.00 100.00. 9.50) 598.40 598.40 0.00 0.00 9.00 100.00 4.75| 578.10 578.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 2.36| 533.00 533.26 9.26 O21 D2E 99.79. 2.00| 551.0 55110 0.00 0.00 O21 99.79 718| 538.90 540.08 118 0.96 LI 98.83 0.60) 516.70 519.76) 3.06 2.49 3.66. 96.34 0.30| 488.20 492.37 | 417 3.39 7.06. 92.94 | 0.15] 481.90 486.41 ASL 3.67 10,73 89.27 0.08 | 459.20 462.73 3.53 2.87 13.60 86.40 | PAN| 425.50 531.64 100.00 ; J i Tested by ip Checked by: Tay Processed by ah Approved by : son Ot ey,OLAS ePwirchitr Anes ATCHIM PEPE BCT eT POPC! ANeRET hams MHA Ethiopian Construction Design & Supervision Works Corporation Management Center Buil Client: TPMO. Location : MEGENAGNA. ‘Test Type : Grain Size analysis ‘TPit.No, BH-1 Date : 15/7/2018 Depth(m) : 23.0m Lab No: 5/11 istribution Curve 100.00 pepo pte 90.00 Jeph % 70.00 +4 Percentage Finer 30.09 ff} -}-+-+--+—]}-} 20.00 | | ‘000 | i iH. WAL | | 0.00 - 100,000 10.000 +1000) Grain size.niih” Tested by : Processed by honey esac‘Geotechn ical Investigation of 5B+G+0 Traffic, TAPERS Char CHT ANAT WC PEP pcreny PCMCE ARCHES AMT TAHA Ethiopian Construction Design & Supervision Works Corporation Research, Laboratory and Trai a ee Menagement Center Building . Client: TPMO Location: MEGENAGNA Test Type : Grain Size analysis TPit. No, BIL? Date : 15/7/2018 Depth(m) : 3.0m Lab No: 6/11 Total mass of sample before wash, g 193.93 Total mass of sample afier wash, 4185. eve | Mass of | Massofsieve+ | Mass of | Percentage | Cumulative | Percentage Openingiinm) | Sieve(g) | Ret soillgy | Ret soit(g) | Retained | % Retained | Passing 75.00 1800.00 7800.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 700-05) 50.00] 1203.50 1203.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 37.50| 1087.80 1087.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 25.00| 1191.20 “1191.20 0.00. 0.09 0.00 700.00 79.60; 748. : 0. B00 0.60 700.00 B50) 586.10 586.10 0.00 0.00 100.00 i 9.50| 598.40 598.40 0.00 0.00 709.00 475{ 578.10 578.10 0.00 0.00 700.00 2.36[ 333.00 533.47 024 0.24 99.76 2.00] $51.10 55110 0.00 0.24 99.76 1.18| 538.90 540.57 0.86 110 983.90. 0.60| 516.70 539.93 71.98 73.08 86.92 0.30| 438.20 493,89. 2.93 16.02. 53.98 15] 481.90 498.50 3.40 19.42 $0.58 0.08| 459.20 463.39 216 21,58. 78.42 PAN| 425.50 577.58 78.42 700.00 ) Tested by + Processed, by’:Depth(an) : | sue i | 90.00 000 er% TAAPRE ChInPCHY ANAT ATCA POPE bomen PCPCE ANGST DAMT MTNA ‘Geotechnical Investigation of SB+G+ Menagement Center Building Test Type : Grain Size analysis Grain Size Distribution Curve a 3 = Percentage Fi | Bom som {sa i= ow ‘100.000 odot tliProcessed by } , he TRAtAP wMNrchiy ANN ATCA PEPE RCr ety POPC! ANeRes hams WHA = se Ethiopian Construction Design & Supervision Works Corporation i it Research, Laboratory and Training Center rR ae z i tor Management Center Building Client: TPMO i MEGENAGNA “Test Type : Grain Size analysis BH2 Date : 15/7/2018 i Depth(m): 50m Lab No: 7/11 Total mass of sample before wash, & 181.98 Total mass of sample afier wash, g : 60 ee rae a ee ce [em | openinginm | Sievers) | Ret.solg)_| Ret soi(g)_| Retned 126 Retained | _ Passing 75:00) 1800.00 7300.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 T0606 i $0.00 1203.50 1203.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 c ‘37.50| 1087.80 "1087.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 25.00| 1191.20 T1920 00 0.00 700.00 i 19.00| 718.50 718.50 0.00 0.09) 0.00 700.00 2250| 586.10 $86.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 9.50 598.40 598.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 700.00 i 475|_ 578.10 578.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 700.00 : 2,36 533.00 533.92 092 0ST O51 99.49 a 2.00| 551.10 551.10 0.00 6.00 0.51 99.49. 118] 538.90, 540.48 1.58 087 137 98.63 0.60| 516.70 519.17 247 1.36 2.73 97.27 i 0.30| 488.20, 490.75 255 1.40 413 95.87 O15| _ 481.90 484.36 2.46 135 5.48 94.52 08 | _ 459.20 460.82 1.62 0.89 637 93.63 Ww PAN| _ 425.50. 425.50 0.00 6.37| f Tested byws__ Checked by :_ Approved byroject + ‘Client ‘TPMO Location: MEGENAGNA ‘\Pit.No, BH2 Depth(m) : 5.0m 100.00 ‘Geotechnical Investigation of ‘Management Center Building TARPRE ebMTCHTY Aes erCII PAPE PCremy PPC! ANLRET heme “thd Ethiopian Construction Design & Supervii Research, Laboratory and Trai ‘Test Type : Grain Size analysis Date : 15/7/2018 Lab No: 7/11 Grain Size Distribution Curve 90.00 ala 8 gi/3 8 Percentage Finer, B 8 g = t 2000 4114 40.00 0.09 00,000 10.000 9.010 odot Gravel sitt Gwy Tested by : Processed by : %, iecked by oe Wpproved by: § WorksORACAS PPIMGHTY ANAT MCCA PAPE boa POPC! ANLAET hams “THA Ethiopian Construction Design & Supervision Works Corporation Research, Laboratory and Training Center Management Center Building TA TENE Re HE Ee BE HE Ee SE eS SS TPMO Location MEGENAGNA ‘Test Type : Grain Size analysis T.Pit. Ne BH-2 Date : 15/7/2018 Depth(m): 21.50m Lab No: 8/11 Total mass of sample before wash, g 123,37 Total mass of sample after wash, g 21,84 Sieve Wass of | Mass ofsieve+ | Massof | Percentage | Cumulative | Percentage Opening(mm) | Slevetg) Ret soi(g) | Ret. soil (g) | Retained | %Retained | Passing 75.00) 1800.00 1800.00. 0.00) 6.00. 0.00 100.00 50.00) 1203.50 1203.50 0.00 6.00. 0.00 100.00 3750| 1087.80 1087.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 5.00| 1191.20 1191.20 0.00. 6.00. 0.00. 100.00 19.00. 718.50. 718.50. 0.00 0.00 0,00. 100.00 12.50) 586.10 586.10 0.00 6,00 0.00 100.00 9.50} 598.40 598.40 0.00 0.00 0.00. 100.00. 4.75| 578.10 3578.10) 0.00. 0.00 0.00 100.00 2.36] 533.00 533.12 042 0.10 O10 99.90 2.00| 551.10 S5LAO! 0.00. 0.00 0.10 99.90. 118) 538.90 540.00. 110 0.89 0.99 99.04 0.60| 516.70 520,42 392 3.02 4.00 96.00. 0.30| 488.20 495AB. 7.28 | 5.90 IT 90,09 O.15| 481.90. 487.39 5.49 | 4AS 14,36. 85.64 I 0.08| 459.20 463.33. 4.13 335. 17.70 82.30 PAN| 425.50. 527.03. 101.53 82,30 100.00 Tested by : _p Checked by Processed’ by o's Approved by efCRAPRE CUMANAY ANI OT CHIN POPE RCT eTT POPC! MNeRES hams ewhd ‘» Ethiopian Construction Design & Supervision Works Corporation Research, Laboratory and Training Center ‘of SB+G#0 Traffic, Management Center Building Client: TPMO- Location ; MEGENAGNA ‘Test Type : Grain Si Twit.No, BH2 Date : 15/7/2018 , Lab No: 8/1 Projet analysis ¢--Gtain Size Distribution Curve sooo HELL +4 — Grain si } Gravel Sand_-——~. sit Clay _ Tested by : | Processed by 1 0.00) 100.000 10.000 1.000 9.100 ‘oto ‘oot | minTAAPRS CATCH AVI OTC PEPE RCT aT? PORE! ANeRES AAMT THA Ethiopian Construction Design & Supervision Works Corporation Geotechnical Investigation of 5B+G+0 Traffic ‘ Management Center Building Client TPMO, | Location: — MEGENAGNA. ‘Test Type :.Grain Size analysis 'TPit.No. BH? Date ; 16/7/2018 ,Depth(m): — 24.70m Lab No: 9/11 Total mass of sample before wash, g 251.77 » Total mass of sample after wash, g t 62.43 Bere | Mass of | Massafsieve+ | Mass of — | Percentage | Cumulative | Percentage ‘Lopeninginum) | Sievetg) | Ret.soil(g) | Ret. soit(g) | Retained | % Retained | Passing | 75.00) 1800.00" 1800.00. 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 50.00| 1203.50 1203.50. 8.00. 0.00. 0.00 100.00. 37.50| 1087.80 1087.80, 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 25.00] 1791.20 1191-20 0.00 0.00 0,00 700.00 19.00 718.50 718.50 0,00. 0.00 0.00 100.00 12.50| 586.10 586.10 0.00. 0.00 0.00 100.00 9.50| 598.40 598.40 0.00. 9.00 9.00 100.00 4.75) 57810 578.18 0.08. 9.03 0.03 99.97 2.36 533.00 53413 143 OAS 948 99.52 2.00| 55110 55110 0.00. 9,00 048 99.52. 1.18] 538.90 S421 32 1.27 176 98.24 0.60| 516.70 525.65, 895 355 531 94.69 030) 488.20 503.08 T488 3.91 i122 38.78 O15 431,90. 500.39. 18,49 7.34 18.56. 81.44 O08 459.20 474.89 | 15,69 6.23 24,80. 75.20 PAN| 425.50 614.84 189.34. 75.20 100,00 “Bee Pen 4 "Tested by :» Checked by ___ fie Approved by; tte en neeORAPAP eeinanAY ANRNT OTCHIM PEPE boreay PCPCE ADRES haMT “WHA Ethiopian Construction Design & Supervision Works Corporation Research, Laboratory and Trai i Investigation of SB+G+0 Traffic Management Center Building TPMO MEGENAGNA, Test ‘Type : Grain Size analysis BH-2 Date : 16/7/2018 Depth(m) : 24,70m Lab No: 9/11 oe Stain Size Distribution Curve _ fe Percentage Finer,% 8B 8 gg 8 8 8 a| 8 8 100.000 10.000 1.000 ‘ Grain size.” hades ot Gravel sang tay Tested by : “Processed by :TRACAS MUTANT ANEW OCI POPE bra POPC! ANERET home “THA se ‘uw Ethiopian Construction Design & Supervision Works Corporation Research, Laboratory and Training Center ‘Geotechnical Investigation of 5B¥G+0 Traffic Management Genter Building TPMO- ‘Location: | MEGENAGNA Test Type : Grain Size analysis TPIL.No, BES Date : 16/7/2018 Depth(m): 460m Lab No: 10/11 Total mass of sample before wash, g 264.80 * Total mass of sample after wash g i 0.94 Flow | Mass of | Mass afsteve* | Mass of | Percentage | Cumulative | Percentage Opening(mm) | Sleve(g) Ret .soil(g) Ret, soil (g) Retained (% Retained Passing 75.00 1800.00 1800.00 0,00 0.00' 0.00 100.00. 50.00| 1203.50. 1203.50 0.00) 0.00 0.00 100.00 7-50-| 4087.80. 1087.80. im 0.00. 0.00 100.00 25.00) 1191.20 1191.20 0,00. 0.00) 0.00. 100.00 19.00. 718.50 718,50 9.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 12.50\ 586.10) 586.10 0.00 9.00 0.00 100.00 9.50\ 598.40 598.40 0.00. 0.00 0.00 100.00) 475| _ 578.10 578.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 2.36) 533.00 535.31 ae O87 0,87. 99.13 2.00| 551.10! 55110 0.00 9.00 0.87 99.13 118|_ 538.90 550.97, 72.07 456 5.43 94.57 0.60 516.70 533.81 17H 6.46 11.89) S811 0.30| 488.20 $03.00 74.80 5.59 17.48 $2.52 O15\ 481.90 490.92. 9.02. 3.41 20.89 79.41 0.08| 459.20 464.83 213 23.01 76.99 PAN\ 425.50 629.36 | 76.99 100.00 <2 Tested by: pe. Processed by :. val Checked by: Approved by : 5Project : Client : TPit. No. Depth(m) 100.00 2000 g 8 ou “Geotechnical Investigation of SB+G+0 Traffic ARACAS PMTCT ANLIT TCI POPE borat PORCH ANCES AMT “TOA Ethiopian Construction Design & Supervision Works Corporation Research, Laboratory and Training Center Management Center Building PMO Location : MEGENAGNA B-3 :4,60m Test Type : Grain Size analysis Date : 16/7/2018 Lab No: 10/11 7 4_-Gfain Size Distribution Curve Percentage Finer,% gg 3 8 8 8 8 30.00 10.00 0.00 400.000 40.000 9,100 aro Grain sizenim are Gravel Tested by : Processed by:DRACRE PPMGHT ART Merci HCPE bora POPC! ANeRET Hams “Td pian Construction Design & Supervision Works Corporation Research, Laboratory and Training Center Approved by: Citas Processed by: rojes | Management Center Building | Client : TPMO | Location: | MEGENAGNA Test Type : Grain Size analysis | 'T.Pit, No. BES Date : 16/7/2018 1 Depth(m): —1940m Lab No:11/11 | Total mass of sample before wash, g 137.83 Total mass of sample afier wash, g ‘ 317 Sieve] Mass of | Mass ofsieve+ | Mass of — | Percentage | Cumulative | Percentage Openingimm) | Sieve(g) | Ret .soli(g) | Ret. soil ( Retained | % Retained | Passing 75:00| 1800.00, 7300.00, 0 0.00 0.00 T0000 $0.00| 1203.50 1203.50. 0.00 0.00 0.00) 100.00. 37.50| 1087.80| 1087.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 100,00 25.00| 1197.20 TI9T-20 0:06 ra : 19.00 718.50 718.50) 0.00 0.00 0.00 706.06 : 12,50| 586.10 586.10) 0.00. 0.00. 0.00. 100.00 9.50| 598.40 598.40 0.00. 0.06 0.00 100.06 475) 578.10 578.10. 0.00 0.00 0.00 100,00 2,36) 533.00 533.00. 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 2.00) 55110 S510 0.00 0.00. 0.00 160,00 118) 538.90. 539.10 0.20 O15. O15 99.85 0.60] 516.70 517.00 0.30 0.22 0.36 99.64 8.30 488.20. 488.75 O55 0.40. 0.76) 99.24 OAS 481.90 482.74 O84 O61 1.37. 98.63 ‘ 0.08 459.20 460.48 128 0.93 2.30 97.70 PAN| 425.50 560.16) 134.66. 97.70 100.00. Bt Gl i Tested by: Checked by _ fea, iClient: TPMO Location : MEGENAGNA Tit. No. BH-3 Depth(m) : 19.40m ONTPRS PNTCHA Bie ICT PEPE Porat POPC! ANeRET AAMT “THA Ethiopian Construction Design & Supervision Works Corporation Research, Laboratory and Training Genter UNH aT AVLEE AR = Project: Geotechnical Investigation of SB+G+0 Traffic rj Management Center Building ‘Test Type : Grain Size analysis Date : 16/7/2018 Lab No: 1/11 »_-Gigin Size Distribution Curve Percentage Finer,% © Processed by : 10.00 HE Eft te \ i 0.00 - 00.000 10.000 1.000 00 ‘010 odot Grain size,mt Gravel ‘tay Tested by :Project : OAAPKE chore ANRIT Mercy PEPE bored PCPCE ANehET hams HA ‘Geotechnical Investigation of 58+G+0 Traffic Management Center Building Client: TPMO Location: MEGENAGNA TPit.No, BMS Depth(m): 2.0m Ethiopian Construction Design & Supervision Works Corporation Research, Laboratory and Tr: Total mass of sample before wash, g Total mass of sample afier wash, ing Center ‘Test ‘Type : Grain Size analysis Date : 16/7/2018 Lab No: 12/11 201.24 33.82 Processed: by :, Checked by: Sf Approved by : Luu) Sieve | Mass of | Massofsieve+ | Mass of | Percentage | Cumulative | Perceniage Openingimm) | Sievers) | Ret.soiutg) |_Ret.soit(g) | Retained | % Retained | Passing '5.00| 1800.00 7800.00 0.60 0.00 0.00) 100.00. $0.00 1203.50 7203.50 0.00 0.00 0.00) 706.00 37.50| 1087.80 1087.80 0.00 0.00 0.00) 100.00 I9.00| 718.50 718.50. 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 ! 72.50 _ 586.10, 586.10 6.60 0.00 0.00 700.00 9.50| 598.40 598.40 0.06 0.00 0.00 706.06] 475{ _ 578.10 578.62 0.52 0.26 0.26 99.74 236[ 533.00 533.89 0.89 044 0.70. 99.30 2.00| 551.10 551.10 0.00 0.00. 0.70 99,36 T18| 538.90 54.01 2H 1.65 175 95.25 0.60| $16.70 521,67 497 247 4.22 95.78 G30| 488.20 496.42 3.22 4.08, 8.30 91.70 i 0.15| 481.90 #133 9.43 4.69 72.99 8701 : ‘dos | 459.20 466.88 7.68 3.82 16.81 S19 PAN| 425.50 SH2I2 167.42, 33.19 100.00 : che ; Tested by:Management Center Building, Client: TPMO Location : MEGENAGNA, TPit. No, BH-3 Depth(m) : 2.0m ORAPRE MIAN ANLIG ATCT PEPE BCH am? POPC! ANAT amt “ThA Ethiopian Construction Design & Supervision Works Corporation ‘Test Type : Grain Size analysis Date : 16/7/2018 Lab No: 12/11 Grain Size Distribution Curve = && BEE BB EF FF Percentage Finer,%| gs 3 3 8 8 8 g i | 20.00 10.00 5 0.00 UY 100.000 1000 9100 Grain size,min oe oT silt cay Tested by : Processed by: Checked by i Approved byMEGENAGNA TRACRP CHMTGHT ANLAT ATCT PEPE beret? PCPCI ADLRES ome "dnd Ethiopian Construction Design & Supervision Works Corporation Research, Laboratory and Trai ing Center ‘Test Type i Grain Size analysis TPit.No, BES Date : 16/7/2018 | Depth(m); 240m Lab No: 13/11 | Toial mass of sample before wash, 230.19 ; + Total mass of sample after wash, g 18.98 Steve | Massof | Mass ofsieve+ | Mass of | Percentage | Cumulative | Percentage | openingioum) | Sieve(g) | _Ret.soit(e) | Ret soit (g) | Retained | % Retained | Passing 73.00| 1800.00 7500.00, 6.00. 0.00 0.00 700.00 50.00| 1203.50 1203.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 37.50| 1087.80 1087.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 25.00| 1191.20 1191.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 700.00 19.00] 718.50 718.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 12.50| 586.10 586.10. 0.06 6.00 0.00 100.06, 9.50| 598.40 598.40. 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 475\__ 578.10 578.70 0.60 0.26 0.26 99.74 236] 533.00 533.32 0.32 O14 0.40 99.60 200| 531.70 55110 0.00 0.00 0.40 99.60 L18| 538.90 540.03. iis 0.49 0.89 99.11 0.60| 516.70 S191 2.41 1.05 1.94, 9.06 030| 488.20 492.00 3.80 1.65 3.59 G64 os] 481.90 436,78 488 212 S71 94,29 0.08 |__459.20 465.04 5.84 2.54 8.25 91.75 PAN| 425.50 (636.71 2121 91,75 700.00 Tested by: Processed by : Checked by Approved by a Agbonieacge sot ons coreTPMO MEGENAGNA TPit.No. BH Depth(m) : 24.0m ‘Geotechnical Investigation of 5B+G+0 Traffic Management Center Building, CARPRE PAT ART Mer POPE Cr EaT PCPCE ANeRET Hams Wha Ti Test Type : Grain S Date : 16/7/2018 Lab No: 13/11 Grain Size Distribution Curve B B. Ethiopian Construction Design & Supervision Works Corporation Research, Laboratory and Trai 2 3 Percentage Finet,% g 8 a a 20.00 10.00 — oo HL *100,000 10.000 1.000) Grain size,nttit® 010 ot Sand. silt Tested by : Processed aeORAERP PRION ANI MTC POPE bc7 ah? PCC! ANeRET ant “ThA 2 Ethiopian Construction Design & Supervision Works Corporation Research, Laboratory and Training Center Project : Geotechnical Investigation of 58+G+0 Traffic Management Center Building Client : e i idaes) Sample type: Disturbed : 4 Location: MEGENAGNA Test type: Atterberg Limit BHA Date 171712018 asm Lab. No ant 10 WT DETE DATA AND COMPUTATION SHEET Fiype at test or my rm i [container No. 335. 308 aia 334 Penatration (rm) 36. 30 24 16 Wit ssimple + Fare wa 0.020 7.050 ORE 504 fit.ofsampie + Tare dry 38.420 35.700 37.610 38,300 of water 77.600 70.390. 11.530, 72.150 Tare 715.000. 75.210 15.100 76.070 faiof dy sol 23.420 | 20.490 22.510 23.230. [Water contont% 43.530 50.708 B12 52.303 fiype of ost cn Po [Container No- 307 4 lito sample + Tare wet 31.200 7250 [w.ofsampio + Tare ry 27.300 24.100 wi ofwator 3.900 3.150 rare 75.290, 14,820 lwtof dyson 72.010, 8.280 [Water content 33.222 33.044 33.585] 53.000 1 52.000 : i “61.000 ost 7 8 8 g s0.000 Result 3 LL 50.85% 49.000 PL 33.58% 0 25 1006 Pl 47.27% Tested By a7 Processed By val ZeGREP? PINTen WR ATE PEP P porary PPI ANLHET hame eToHA ™ Ethiopian Construction Design & Supervision Works Corporation Research, Laboratory and Training Center ena | Project : Geotechnical Investigation of 5B+G+0 Traffic Management Center Building i Client : - an TPMO Sample type: Disturbed | Location: MEGENAGNA Testtype: —Atterberg Limit i Test Pi BH 17/7/2018 | Depth (m): 23.0m ent aN. IMT DETER AA AND COMPUT Type of ast o rn i j Conteiner No. 139 28 39 266. No.of Blows “T_ 36 32 20 16 fytcoF samp F740. 6.750. 7.2007 72a nico eampte + Tare dry 37.100 36.600 37.600, 36.800 nico water 10.640 10.190. 11,600 17,560. rare 74.310 15.040 14.720 714.800 [wtof dy col 22.790 24.560 22.880 22.000 1 [ivator content 46.687 47.263 50.899, 52.545, [ype of test PL PL Contsiner Nar 189 390 |wcot sample + Tare wet 27.400 27.870 [wtot sample + Tare dry 23.760 24.460 ot water 3.340 3.410 rare 74.710 15.260 lwtof dy soi 9.050 9.200 [water content % 36.906, 37.085. 36,985] 54.000 Es 3.000 | — | | 52.000 - 2 Fo caer 3 sacca = - i 49,000 | 1 Result 3 47.000 {— ~ LL __ 49.20% a = . PLL 36.98%, 10 Karen Dog 109 Pl 42.21% Number gf 81882 “29 Tested By ge. 2 \%, \checked By * Processed By proved ByTRAPRE erINrCh Algae OCH MOE bere POPC! ANeRET hdms eTEhA %., Ethiopian Construction Design & Supervision Works Corporation Center Project : Geotechnical Investigation of 6B+G+0 Traffic Management | Center Buicing : it : | ao Sample type : Disturbed | Location: MEGENAGNA Testtype: Atterberg Limit | TestPit: BIL? Date 47/7/2018 | Depth (m}: 3.0m lab.No: Gift" ul LASTIC LIMIT DATA AND COMPUTATION SHEE ype of test rm i iL i [Container No. 324 283 318 365 i No of Bows TT 36 30. 24 18 [wi.otsample® Tare wet 75.950 5.540 7.510 Wot sample + Tare dry 30.500 34.000 33.450 34.000. 1 lw. water 9.330 14.930. 12.080 73.510 [rare 14.750 14.930 14.910 14.910 t feof ay sol 15.750. 9.070 18.640 19.080 i lwatercontont 39.238 62.559 25.210 70.770 ype of tt PL aL (container NG. 136 316 [Wot sample Tare wat 23.640. 20.180 [Wofsamplo- Tare dry 25.480 25.180 ; htt water 4.160 4.000 i [rare 74310 74.800 ! wtof dey sol 11.170 70.380 ! [water content % 37.243 38.536 37.889 71.000 _—Floy ou 70.000 a {— | 8.000 : 8.000 = 67.000 t— : % sow |[— | ed i 8 64.000 ' = 63.000 I g Sou : ro Result 2 60.000 LL __ 66.00% 8.000 37.89% 10 27.41% Tested By _7 Checked By Processed By Approved ByARAPRE CITGO ANAT OTCTICY POPE borane PCPCE ANGELS Ame eTohA *., Ethiopian Construction Design & Supervision Works Corporation | Project : Geotechnical Investigation of 5B+G+0 Traffic Management | Genter Building : } Cliont: : 4 a Sample'type: Disturbed i Location: MEGENAGNA Testtype: —_Atterberg Limit ' Test Pit: BH? Date : ATITI2018 i J Depth (m): 50m Lab. No mt W anansrsntcummom soso Frype of test i rr uo rm w 1 [Conteiner No- 296 a2 145, 201 | [Ho-otBtows {36 30 24 18 i ln.ot sample Tare wot 19.720. 47.280 44.690 42.190 L W [tof sample + Tare dry 30,000 34,200 31.770 30.200 } [ivtot water 9720 413.080 12.920 11.990 * Fare 14.900 14.920 714.640, 74.700. latof ary som 715.100, 19.280 17.130 15.410 ‘| (Water contont 64371 67.842 75.423, 77.807 ; ype of fest PL os 1 {Container no 2 20 { fcotsampe + tare wat 27.230 | 27.360 lwt.otsamplo + Tare dry 23.100 23.150 i [eof wator 4.430 4.240 | fo 74,650 | 14.640 fweot ary som 8.250 8.510 a [water content 30.067 | 49.471 576 78.000 _ NI Wael | BEE eee eee oe w 8 72.000 pet ~ | B 70.000 = a : (66.000 7— Result 2 e000 LL __71.45% fee , 10 100 Pl 21.68% i aa { Tested By £2 Bh Processes ay ah z aia 1 " Works CIN | : / eet a \ | ° a fs #9ORACRS DINAH AML Mercy EPR pcre ‘ PCPCE ANGHET tens ena ou Ethiopian Construction Design & Supervision Works Corporation Research, Laboratory and Training Center ee Te = Project: Geotechnical Investigation of §8+G+0 Traffic Management Center Building . Client : TRMO ‘Sample type : Disturbed Location: MEGENAGNA Testtype: _Alterberg Limit : DHA Date : anmmi2018 n1s0m “Lab.No: ait ano DETERMINATIONS MPUTATION Fgpe oftest i i iw rm ontciner Na. [ar 340 33 a io of ows 36 30 zi i tot sampie + Tarewet %.550_| 45.650, F160 | 46.100 fat sample «Tare dry 39.200 | 36.000, 33,800] 36,000 cot water 0.260 | 9.630 8,950 70.400 hare 46.250_| 14.680 44.770_| 15.060. wtf ay ao 24:040|__21.120 7191030 | 20.940. [Water content 42.679 | 45.597 47.031 [48.233 ape ftest PL 7 Contsiner No 76 76. Wo smple + Tare wot 30.360 [30.680 fof sampie+ Tare dry 26.430 26.490 IWectwatr 3.960 4,040 Hare 45.100 [14.970 wtf ary sol 7.260 _| 11.520 Water content 36.111 | 35.089 36.090 900 Eloy cure ; 0.000 | "47,000 + 2 % ‘e000 = ss000 4 44.000 Esco 200 10 Tested By 2) Processeid By aut:TAAPAP PPIRAHA? AMRIT OTCILA PEPE bereny POPC! ANERET hams “ThA Geotechnical Investigation of 58+G+0 Traffic Management Center Building TPMO. Samplo type: Disturbed MEGENAGNA Test type: Atterberg Limit BHS Date 16/7/2018 24.0m Lab.No: 13/11" PLASTIC LIM NS_DATA AND COMPUTATION SHEET." Fiype of test i i ie i Ertan No. 391 316. 369 174 to. of Blows 36 30 24 7 [wot sample Tare wet B70 74.750 770 37.550 IWicotsamplo + Tare dry 37-600. 3.400 300° 8.700 iv. of walor 12.110 10.310 3.440 7.850 [rare 14.660, 14.970 74.730 15.240 wtf dy sol 22.040. 19.470 17.570 14.460 [Wator content % 52.790 52.953 53.557 54.288 fiype of est PL 7 [contoinerNo- 62 30 lwi.of sample Tare wet 29.990 27.670 : [weofsamplo-+ Tare dry 26.030 24.240 wif water 3,900 3.430 rare 15.220, 714.800 [weet dey sol 710.810 9.440 [Water content % 36.633 36.335 36.4854] 4.500 oz 1250 | — — 4,000 | gars - i 19600 fee 8 ss2s0]- — % 83.000 > Result 3. 52760 Li __ 53.45% tas PL 36.48% 10 PI Tested By_{/A Processed By 16.97%DRACKP CRIN AMRIT TCA POPE BOP PCP ANGELS hAMT HA Project : Geotechnical Investigation of 58+G+0 Traffic Management Center Building Client : TPMO ‘Sample type: Disturbed Location : MEGENAGNA Test type ‘Atterberg Limit I Test Pit : BES Date 18/7/2018, i 226m Lab.No: 12/11" OPI NATIONS DATA puraTh [iype oftest i i i ny ' [conteiner No. 385. 326. 384 359 Ino. of Blows 38 30 26 18. lwo! sample + Tare wot [48.036 a916 960. 44.240. : of nampie+ Tare 38.570 33.550, 37.100 35,600 [weot water 10.450. 8.360 9.880 9.240 [rere 15.050, 44.620 15,060 15.120 t lwtof dry sol 23.520 18.730 22.040 20.480. ' lvator contort % 44.473 44.634 44.828 46.117 ype of test e om ; [conteiner No. 77 43 lwtof sample + Taro wot 31.550. 79.650 lWtot sample + Tare dry 27.480 26.000 Init of water “4.070 3.690 Tare 74,890, 714.600, lwtof dy soi 12.590 14.400 [Watsr content % 32.327, 32.268 32348 45.280 Fi 48.000 eee # : 2 ee 44.790 — 8 B ass00 +— Result a | LL __ 44.62% 44.250 PL 32.36% 10 1006 Pl 12.47% Numbor of Tested By LA Processed By zalTRAPRP CMPCHOD ANLIT OTCILIY PAPE BCT AT PCPEE ANGELS tame eToHA Ethiopian Construction Design & Supervision Works Corporation Project: Geotechnical Investigation of 5B+G+0 Traffic Management . Center Buliding . ti hcaaats TPMO Sample type: Disturbed Location: MEGENAGNA Test type: Atlerberg Limit Test Pit : BES Date: 16/7/2018 i Depth (mj: 19.40 wlab.No: 11/11" DETER DATA AND c N SHEET 1 | [eonteinor Nox 331 340 323 Bit R [No.of Bows 36 30. 24 18 lwtot sample Tare wet T7360 9.630 WS az 620 iwtof sample + Tare dry 35.700 30.290 30.800 37.700 [weot water 12.280 9.340 9.790 70.920 Tare 15.100. 14,850 14.980 74.400 wtf dy eal 20,600 15.440 16.820 17.300 lWator content % 58.512 60.492 61.884 63.121 [ype oftost PL Conteiner No. 24 330 [weot sample + Tare wet 2.140 26.430 [wot sample Tare dry 23.900 22.980 wit water 3.640 3.450. rare 15.200 15.070, lwtof dy soi 8.600 7.910 lWetor content 44.651 43.618 Ta733 4.000 El 63.500 63.000 +> | 4 2.500 = 62000 | ——_— f ats00 | 8 61.000 i 60.500 i isa 0H Result 3 59.500 7 Lit __61,50% ena . PL 44.13% ra 190 PL 47 37% tested By LMA Processed By wokGRACE ROMAN ANLAT OTC POPE BC ATT PCRCE ANGST home “THA ™* Ethiopian Construction Design & Supervision Works Corporation Research, Laboratory and Training Center fe Project: Geotechnical Investigation of 5B+G+0 Traffic Management Center Building Cliont : abtake ‘Sample type: Disturbed Location: MEGENAGNA Testtype: —_Atlerberg TestPit: BH? Date 16/7/2018 Depth (mm): 2470m 5 + Lab. No ont IQUIp AND PLASTIC LIMIT DETERMINATIONS DATA AND COMPUTATION SHEET. fijpe of teat i ms i [conteinar Ne [365 344 362 Blow 3 6. lwt.ct sample + Tare wot 47.070 49.660 42.060 lwt.ot sample + Tare dry 736.530 37.500 32.490 nt. wator 10.740, 12.160 9.570 Hare, 75.240 14.070. 14,880 wiof dry sol 21,090 22.830 17.610 ator content 50.925 53.268 54.344 Fiype of test PL PL [Gonteiner No 95 10 lt.ot sample + Tare wot 27.360 26.990 [tof sample + Taro dey 24.080, 23.730 ltt water 3.270 3.260 Fae 75.020 14,850 wtof dry soll 9.070 8.880 Water content % 36.053 36.712 36.582] 55.000 Flow ctu 54.500 4.000 "53500 i 3.000 3 92.600 -- 2 62.000 2 1.800 = Result 2 51.000 : i - LL __563.45% 7 30508 PL 26.38% 10 25 00 Pl 47.07% 1.) Tested By Processed By zal "SeanaCPCI ANGKGT home “THA ‘R, Ethiopian Construction Design & Supervisi ORAPKP COUCH ARs MeTCILICY OPE pcre? n Works Corporation Research, Laboratory and Training Center Project : Geotechnical Investigation of 5B+G+0 Traffic Management Center Building hilelidd TeMo Sample type: Disturbed i MEGENAGNA Test type: Alterberg Limit BES Date ; 16/7/2018 : Depth (mm): 4.60m Lab.No: 0/11" \QUID AND PLASTIC LINIT/DETERMINATIONS DATA AND COMPUTATION SHEET. Fiype of test i i i i [conteiner No. 309 303 239 392 Penetrationtmm) [35 30 24 18 [we.of sample «Tare wat 7.780. 48.360. 8.310 Waa IWtof sample + Tare dry 38.100 39,600 38.050 37.650 7 Wet wator 9,680 10.380 70.260 9.790 Tere 75.080, 75.010 713.990 14.510, ‘ fuof any soi 23.020 24.580 24.060 22.740 | |water content % 42.050 42.253 42.643, 43.052 | [iypo of est 7 PL ; [conteiner Nox 40 69 [Wot sample + Tare wot 28.480 26.930 lwi.of sample + Yare dry 25,380 24.410 lwitot water 3.110 2.620 | tare 13.430, 14.870 : [wut dry soll 17,950 9.540 j [Wate contont% 8.025 26.415 26.220) i 49.280 | 43.000 ! a 22780 bos 8 I g 220 a Result eee LL _ 42.52% siz ie PL 26.20% ‘a 09 Pl 16.30% Ponatrato Tested By {4 et Processed By vat aMPCMCE ANE hams Tend OLR ITGHAY ANB TCT PEDE DOP GAT Priect Geotechnical Investigation of 5B+G+0 Traffic Management Center Building Glient : TPMO Sample Type: ‘Disturbed i. Location: MEGENAGNA Test Type : Direct Shear T.Pit. No. BH-1 Date; 16/7/2018 Depth(m): 3.5m lab-No; 4/11" Normal Stress [Shear Stress] (kPa) | (kPa) 100 87 200 122 [300 139 ' i 380 i 160 M0 £ x0 Net pia & wf | de et 40 + i 20 7 | es —t 9 3% 6 90 120 150 380 210 240 270 300 a0 Normal Stress(kPa) C=64,00kPa =1457° 4 fasTED By.__Aimiated PROCESSED BY: ohTRAPAP MITCH ANCA WCRI POPP RCT E POPC! ANRET NAMs “THD, ** Ethiopian Construction Design & Supervision Works Corporation and Tre Prject: Geotechnical Investigation of 5B+G+0 Traffic Management Center Building, Client : Sample Type: Disturbed Location: MEGENAGNA Test Type: Direct Shear TPit.No, — BH-L Date: 16/7/2018 Depth{m): 23.0 Lab-No: 5/11 ‘Normal Stress [Shear Stress (kPa) (ka) 100 90 200 322, 300. 170. Shear Stress Vs Normal Stress * 0 30 6 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 Normal stress{kPa) = 47.83kPa . %=21.80° rasteo BY; Ava as oA PROCESSED BY: soukTRAP? PHC Ang aeTcitny POPE borate PCPCY ANGRET Nam “ThA ‘Ethiopian Construction Design & Supervision Works Corporation Research, Laboratory and Training Center Priect: Geotechnical Investigation of 5B+G+0 Traffic Management Center Building Client : TeMO Sample Type: Disturbed Location: — MEGENAGNA Test Type: Direct Shear T.Pit.No, BH-2 Date: 16/7/2018 Depth{m): 3.0m Lab-No : 6/11" Normal Stress | Shear Stress] (kPa) (kPa) 100 94 200 127 300 159 Shear Stress Vs Normal Stress 0.325x+ 61.667 30-60 «90120 350 180 210 240270300 Normal Stress(kPa) C= 61.50kPa e =18.00° tasTeD BY_Afmiat- A PROCESSED BY: voTMAPAP EIMTCHID AMeIS WerchIry PUP Porat PCHCH ANeRET Hams HA agEthiopian Construction Design & Supervision Works Corporation Research, Laboratory and Training Center Prject : Geotechnical Investigation of SB+G+0 i Traffic Management Center Building Client : TPMO Sample Type: Disturbed Location: | MEGENAGNA Test Type: Direct Shear ‘T.Pit. No, BH-2 Date: 16/7/2018 Depth(m): 5.0m Lab-No: Way ‘Normal Stress |Shear Stress| (kPa) (kPa) 100 90 200 15 300. 140 ‘Shear Stress Vs Normal Stress ae es =I 20 fo ° * 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 Normal Stress{kPa) C= 65.00kPa ° =14.04° Tasre Byles f|_ PROCESSED o_oTAaPRP ePINTANTTY ANEIT AeTCILiry MPR bE aMY PERCE ANARET hamT “THA Priect: Geotechnical investigation of 5B+G+0 Traffic Management Center Building Client : TeMO. Sample Type: Disturbed Location: MEGENAGNA Test Type: Direct Shear TPit,No. — BH-2 Date: 17/7/2018 Depth(m):. 21.50m Lab-No: 8/11" : ‘Normal Stress] Shear Stress] (kPa) (kPa) 100 7 200. 118 0 Shear Stress Vs Normal Stress ° - 0 30 6 «90 «120 150 180 210 240 270 300 ‘Normal Stress(kPa) C= 48.67kPa =15.91" vaste by:_ Alivia A PROCESSED BY:RAPP PPUATLHTD AMRIT AeTCILIry PEPE PCP aTY PCRCE ANKLES OAMe “THA ‘Ethiopian Construction Design & Supervision Works Corporation Research, Laboratory and Training Center Priect : Geotechnical Investigation of 5B+G+0 Traffic Management Center Building, Client : TPMO Sample Type: Disturbed Location: MEGENAGNA ‘Test Type : Direct Shear T.Pit, No. BH-2 Date: 17/7/2018 Depth(m): 24.70m. Lab-No : 9/11" ‘Normal Stress | Shear Stress| (kPa) (kPa) 100 74 200 115 ‘300- 145- ‘Shear Stress Vs Normal Stress 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 Normal Stress(kPa) . C= 40.33kPa }=18.52" TASTED BY: PROCESSEDARATE PTH ANNE TCI PEPE DC at PORCH AneRET Noms Taha Ethiopian Construction Design & Supervision Works Corporation Research, Laboratory and Training Center Priect: Geotechnical Investigation of 5B+G+0 > Traffic Management Center Building Client : TPMO Sample Type: Disturbed Location: MEGENAGNA Test Typ Difect Shear TPit.No, BH-3 Date: 17/7/2018 Depth(m): 4.60m Lab-No: 10/11" Normal Stress |Shear Stress (kPa) (kPa) 100 82 200 105 300 |, 155 0 "30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 Normal stress(kPa) C= 41.0kPa =20.05" [EE COIS fe ‘TASTED BY: PROCESSED BY:RAPA (INFANT IEW OTC HOPE bran? PORCH ANetET hams “HA ‘Ethiopian Construction Design & Supervision Works orporation Research, Laboratory and Training Center Priect: Geotechnical Investigation of 5B+G+0 Traffic Management Center Building Client : TeMO Sample Type: Disturbed Location: MEGENAGNA Test Type: Direct Shear T.Pit.No. BH-3 Date: 17/7/2018 Depth(m): 19.40m Lab-No : 11/11" Normal tres /Shear Stress (kPa) (kPa) 100 100 200) 119 300 | _170 Shear Stress Vs Normal Stross 200 180 160 140 120 ‘Shear Stress(kPa) 8 60 40 2 - 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 Normal Stress(kPa) (C= 59.67kPa 6 =19.29° 7 [GER eee de (gery PROCESSED BY: /APPROVED BY: iii Le roe a oyTRAPRP thivtatity AIH ATC PEP borat PCIE ANGRET NOms “THA + Ethloplan Construction Design & Supervision Works Corporation Prject : Geotechnical Investigation of 5B+G+0 _ Traffic Management Center Building Client : TeMO Sample Type: Disturbed Location: TPMO Test Type: Direct Shear TPit.No. MEGENAGNA Date: 17/7/2018 Depth(m): 22.0m Lab-No : 12/11! Normal Stréss [Shear Stress i (kPa) (kPa) 100 OL 200 133 300, 175 ‘Shear Stress Vs Normal Stress = = =e 160 «9 30 6 90 120 450 180 210 240 270 300 Normal Stress(kPa) C= 49.00kPa %=22.78" Coe Oey Zagat. Nts Or [$7 - y is "en, TASTED: fT. GRafep by. 3 Hie PROCESSED BY: \e \"sem* APPROVED BY:, 4 Me %,ONAPKE thahrchity ANAT ATCT POPE REET Efe) POPCY ANeRT hams Toa ‘~ Ethiopian Construction Design & Supervision Works Corporation Research, Laboratory and Training Conter Priect: Geotechnical Investigation of 5B+G+0. Traffic Management Center Building Client : PMO. Sample Type? Disturbed MEGENAGNA Test Type : Direct Shear Tpit. No, BH Date: © 17/7/2018 Depth(m): 24.0m Lab-No : 13/11" Normal Stress |Shear Stress (kPa) (kPa) 100 88 200 1 128 300, [159 Shear Stress Vs Normal Stross « 9 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 ‘Normal Stress(kPa) C=54.00kPa $=19.54" eae TASTED BY: PROCESSED BY: sake >| ANNEX-3: CORE PHOTOANNEX-2: LABORATORY TEST _| DATASe fini he 7 f 8 508Ethiopian Construction Design & Supervision Works Corporation | “ek enee} | Geotechnical Investigation, Geotechnical Engineering & Underground Construction Design and Supervision Works Sector BOREHOLE GEOLOGICAL LOG PROJEOT = owGva TWO BONING ORNS = Fano wren bos ferorrect at? Lea | | eee [a | _paeeneth eens vy et a ro abs yo ae re fntmstone maton ii ‘onsuttan CONTRACTOR CUPID ewer a works Cop IN TCR: Tetateorrecvary [seats Semon @ rab Beursh waa “a, sca: seis ero racovnry % ROD: Rock unity sesigncton gee ats etch by Teas ru ondeEthiopian Construction Design & Supervision Works Corporation Geotechnical Investigation, Geotechnical Engineering & Underground Construction Design and Supervision Works Sector POREHOLE GEOLOGICAL LOG. Trnmanas Sein fee Se [nf DDL Paemeee | een toe es ae frit me ak doe fo frees wef dd rear roa: Taco weary ‘ono area Wea SOR Sout cre eco ROD: Beek ust osgnaton cmtEthiopian Construction Design & Supervision Works Corporation POREHOLE @EOLOGICAL LOG Bion Pasenif ror fooe fay [ poser nt suey este | ch vey ae tan ey ym seg ea Mas gs eh ran TeR: Tot coe reco.0y [enorme |S0R: Sol cor recovery aD: Reck qual designation ease on saves) | Geotechnical Investigation, Geotechnical Engineering & Underground Construction Design and Supervision Works Sector Down by besuesn W/Tc coma