Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Guidance on Food
Traceability,
Withdrawals and
Recalls within the
UK Food Industry
February 2019
Annex B
For all queries about this guidance — including if you require the
information in an alternative format such as audio, large print or Braille
— please use the number below.
3
Revision history
This guidance follows the Government Code of Practice on Guidance. If you believe
this guidance breaches the Code for any reason, please let us know by emailing
betterregulation@food.gov.uk. If you have any comments on the guidance itself,
please call us using the contact number on page 2.
4
Contents
SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................3
CONTENTS .................................................................................................................5
INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................7
DEFINITIONS ............................................................................................................ 10
TRACEABILITY ........................................................................................................ 12
Key Steps in Developing Food Traceability Systems ........................................... 13
5
MANAGING A FOOD WITHDRAWAL/RECALL ....................................................... 32
Information Management ........................................................................................ 32
Monitoring progress of a food withdrawal/recall .................................................. 33
Closing a food withdrawal/recall ............................................................................ 33
Handling of unsafe food.......................................................................................... 33
Reviewing the food withdrawal/recall .................................................................... 34
6
Introduction
1. This guidance has been produced by the UK’s Central Competent Authorities,
the Food Standards Agency (FSA) with Food Standards Scotland (FSS), in
association with members of working groups and a governing steering group,
established as part of a UK project, to:
• develop comprehensive UK guidance to clarify the roles,
responsibilities and expectations of the key players involved in food
withdrawals and recalls in the UK;
• improve the accessibility and consistency of food recall information
directed at consumers;
• enhance business to business communications about food recalls
and withdrawals; and
• establish guidance on root cause analysis (RCA) procedures to be
used by industry in the event of food withdrawals and recalls.
2. It replaces the FSA Guidance Notes for Food Business Operators on Food
Safety, Traceability, Product Withdrawal and Recall produced in 2007 1.
3. Project group members included representatives from the food industry, trade
bodies, consumer organisations and enforcement authorities (see Annexe A for
membership).
4. FBOs are responsible for the safety of the food which they produce, distribute,
store or sell and shall not place unsafe food on the market. They must ensure
that the food they produce complies with food law. Food law requires FBOs to
be able to trace the suppliers of their food and the business customers to
whom they have supplied the food (i.e. one step forward and one step back)
and to be able to remove unsafe food from the market should a food safety
incident arise. FBOs should therefore have in place suitable traceability and
food withdrawal/recall systems as part of their Food Safety Management
System. FBOs may wish to seek advice from their enforcement authority,
primary authority or a third-party consultant for assurance that any system
developed for this purpose is appropriate and compliant.
1
https://www.food.gov.uk/sites/default/files/media/document/fsa1782002guidance.pdf
7
Intended audience
7. The guidance outlines food law requirements and clarifies the roles,
responsibilities and expectations of the key stakeholders involved in the
withdrawal/recall of unsafe food in the UK.
8. The guidance sets out the requirements in relation to food safety incidents, in
accordance with Regulation (EC) No. 178/2002. It does not include animal
feed (including pet food). However, FBOs may wish to adopt the principles
within this guidance when dealing with non-safety (non-compliant) related food
incidents or animal feed incidents.
11. This guidance should be read in conjunction with Regulation (EC) No.
178/20022, the Food Safety Act 19903, associated domestic food law
2
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:02002R0178-20180701&qid=1530528430965&from=EN
3
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1990/16/contents. Equivalent legislation in NI is The Food Safety (NI) Order 1991 -
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/nisi/1991/762/contents/made
8
legislation4, EU Food Hygiene Regulations5, domestic food hygiene
regulations6 and other established official guidance.
12. The advice in this guidance on legal requirements cannot cover every situation
and FBOs may need to refer to the relevant legislation to see how it applies in
any given circumstance. FBOs with specific queries may wish to seek the
advice of enforcement authorities or seek their own legal advice.
4
The General Food Law Regulations 2004 in Scotland and Wales -http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2004/3279/contents/made
the Food Safety and Hygiene (England) Regulations 2013 in England-
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/2996/schedule/9/made and the General Food Regulations (NI) 2004 in NI -
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/nisr/2004/505/contents/made
5
Regulation (EC) No.s 852/2004 – https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02004R0852-
20090420&qid=1545304105490&from=EN
Regulation (EC) No. 853/2004 - https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02004R0853-
20171121&qid=1545304143432&from=EN
Regulation (EC) No. 854/2004 – https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02004R0854-
20170101&qid=1545304202861&from=EN
Regulation (EC) No. 2073/2005 - https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02005R2073-
20180101&qid=1545304256862&from=EN
6
the Food Safety and Hygiene (England) Regulations 2013 - http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/2996, the Food Hygiene
(Wales) Regulations 2006 - http://www.legislation.gov.uk/wsi/2006/31/made, the Food Hygiene Regulations (Northern Ireland)
2006 -http://www.legislation.gov.uk/nisr/2006/3/contents/made and the Food Hygiene (Scotland) Regulations 2006
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ssi/2006/3/contents/made
9
Definitions
‘consumer’ means a member of the public who purchases food or drink for
personal use;
‘business customer’ means a food business who buys food from another
food business;
‘enforcement authority' means local or port health authority, FSA, FSS or the
Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs in NI, depending on
the type of food business;
‘food’ means all processed or unprocessed food, including drink. It does not
include animal feed or pet food;
‘food (safety) incident’ means an event where there are concerns about
actual or suspected threats to the safety of food that could require intervention
to protect consumers' interests;
‘food waste’ means food that is not intended for human consumption due to it
being unsafe or unfit for human consumption;
‘recall’ means the process by which food is removed from the supply chain
and consumers are advised to take appropriate action, for example to return
or dispose of the food;
10
‘retail’ means the handling, processing and storage of food at the point of sale
or delivery to the consumer;
‘root cause analysis’ means a method of problem solving used to identify the
cause of the food incident;
‘traceability’ means the ability to trace and follow a food and drink, through all
stages of production, processing and distribution;
‘unsafe food’ means food that may cause illness or physical harm if
consumed, e.g. food contaminated with pathogenic (food poisoning) bacteria
or food that has inadequate allergen information;
‘withdrawal’ is the process by which a food is removed from the supply chain,
where the food has not reached the consumer.
11
Traceability
14. Traceability is a means to identify food in the event of a food safety incident.
An effective traceability system allows for corrective actions to be taken
efficiently and effectively should an incident occur. It enables FBOs to target
any withdrawals and/or recalls, to give information to enforcement authorities
and can help minimise the level of disruption and scale of the withdrawal/recall
to the business.
FBOs must be able to identify who has supplied them with food, food
producing animals, or any substance intended or expected to be
incorporated into food products and to whom they have supplied food
products (one step forward and one step back in the supply chain).
Food must be labelled or adequately identified by FBOs to facilitate
traceability.
NOTE: FBOs are not required to keep records of sales to the final consumer.
12
Best Practice
Each segment of the supply chain should be able to quickly trace all the
foods received and dispatched (one step forward and one step back). For
manufacturers of food, this will include being able to quickly trace, as
required, the ingredients and packaging materials used to manufacture the
finished products they distribute and/or sell.
15. The following information details the various steps involved in developing an
effective food traceability system.
FBOs are legally required to record information on the traceability of food purchased
from suppliers and sold to business customers (this does not include food that is sold
directly to the consumer). This information is detailed below and can often be found
on a variety of documents, including invoices or delivery documents.
Defining batches of food is essential for good traceability. In the event of a food
safety incident Regulation (EC) No. 178/2002 considers a whole batch, lot or
consignment unsafe unless demonstrated otherwise.
Traceability information for food (one step forward and one step back in the supply
chain) is required by law. The following information should be recorded:
13
• name and address of supplier/business customer;
• details of product, to enable its identification, and quantity in which
supplied;
• the date of the transaction and delivery.
FBOs may wish to use the template document in Annexe C to record the required
information.
In addition to the above, all FBOs that handle products of animal origin (POAO) or
sprouted seeds must also comply with more specific traceability requirements7.
These are outlined in Annexe D.
Best Practice
7
Commission implementing Regulation (EU) No 931/2011 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-
content/EN/TXT/?qid=1540286809065&uri=CELEX:32011R0931. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 208/2013
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1540286887876&uri=CELEX:32013R0208
14
- date of production
- time of start and end of production (where appropriate)
- saleable product size
- food contact packaging
- number of packs per case
- number of cases
- linking the product batch code to all raw materials used in its
production
Best Practice
Food retailers are not required to keep records of sales to the consumer (since
consumers are not food businesses). Wholesalers supplying to retail outlets are
required to keep records. Where a retailer knows that it is supplying directly to
15
another food business, e.g. a catering outlet, traceability requirements must be
adhered to. Caterers, such as restaurants, must keep traceability records of food
supplied to them but are not required to keep records of food sold to consumers
because consumers are not food businesses.
It is important that FBOs review their traceability systems to ensure that they remain
effective, and that information can be easily retrieved in a timely manner.
Best Practice
16
Making a decision to withdraw or recall food
(a) to the normal conditions of use of the food by the consumer and at
each stage of production, processing and distribution, and
Where the product may have reached the consumer, the operator shall
effectively and accurately inform the consumers of the reason for its
withdrawal, and if necessary, recall from consumers products already
supplied to them when other measures are not sufficient to achieve a
high level of health protection.
16. In the event of a food incident, FBOs are required to determine if the food is
unsafe and whether a withdrawal and/or recall is necessary.
17. FBOs who initiate a food withdrawal/recall as a result of a food safety incident
must notify their enforcement authority immediately with details of the incident
(nature of the problem, food affected, quantity etc) and of the action taken or
proposed to prevent the risk.
18. The decision tree below and the questions in Annexe E outline a process for
establishing if food is unsafe and the necessary actions to take.
17
*The above process may also be followed for non-safety related food incidents
18
Performing a risk assessment
19. FBOs may be able to quickly identify that a food is unsafe due to certain food
safety regulatory limits being exceeded, however if this is not the case a risk
assessment may need to be carried out to establish the level of adverse effect
a food can have on consumers.
20. FBOs are required to carry out risk assessments and make decisions regarding
the safety of the food. Technical expertise is required in carrying out a risk
assessment to understand the hazards involved and the adverse effects that
can arise. FBOs may need to seek advice from technical experts and are
advised to work with their enforcement authority to determine the information
needed and the steps necessary to carry out an effective risk assessment. In
all situations, FBOs should liaise with the enforcement authority without delay
to determine the appropriate action that needs to be taken.
22. As part of the risk assessment, consideration should also be given to the target
consumer group of the food and the potential risk and sensitivities associated
with that group in consuming that food.
24. FBOs should record the outcomes from their risk assessment and supporting
evidence as this will assist in determining the need for and extent of a
withdrawal/recall.
19
Roles and responsibilities of key players
26. Any FBO in a food supply chain could be responsible for initiating a food
withdrawal/recall, depending on where in the chain the food safety incident is
identified. Examples may include producers, processors or manufacturers.
There may be more than one FBO involved and FBOs may need to refer to
commercial agreements with brand owners regarding roles and
responsibilities.
27. The table below outlines the actions to be taken by FBOs initiating a food
withdrawal/recall as a result of a food safety incident:
20
Actions Withdrawal Recall
If appropriate, liaise with the supplier who has supplied the unsafe ✔ ✔
food to establish withdrawal/recall procedures
✔ ✔
Provide advice to business customers on action to be taken to
withdraw/recall food
n/a ✔
Prepare ‘Point of Sale’ (POS) recall notifications for consumers and
send it to all relevant business customers
✔ ✔
Keep all relevant parties informed throughout the withdrawal/recall
process
Carry out a review to determine the cause of the food safety incident ✔ ✔
(e.g. RCA) and implement corrective measures to be shared with the
enforcement authority
21
Best Practice
28. FBOs that have received notification from a FBO who has decided to initiate a
food withdrawal/recall may include distributors, importers, wholesalers and
brokers (retailers are covered in the section below).
29. The table below outlines the actions to be taken by FBOs who have been
notified of a food withdrawal/recall:
22
Retailers
30. This section is for retailers, where activity is limited to purchasing food
products and selling them directly to the consumer. It also includes caterers,
where prepacked food is sold to take away.
31. Where retailers sell a branded product that is subject to withdrawal/recall, they
should co-operate as necessary with the FBO responsible for the
management of the incident.
Remove all unsafe food from sale and ensure it is stored separately ✔ ✔
from other non-affected food
Accept returns of the affected food from consumers, clearly identify n/a ✔
and store such food separately from non-affected food
Return the affected food to the FBO or dispose of it, if requested and ✔ ✔
in accordance with corresponding waste requirements (taking
direction from the FBO who has initiated the withdrawal/recall)
33. Out of home businesses must ensure that unsafe food is not sold or served to
consumers as part of the food service.
34. The table below outlines the actions to be taken by FBOs in relation to food
served in service:
23
Actions Withdrawal Recall
Ensure that the unsafe food is removed, clearly identified, kept ✔ n/a
separately from non-affected food and not used in service
Return the affected food to the FBO or dispose of it, if requested and ✔ n/a
in accordance with corresponding waste requirements (taking
direction from the FBO who has initiated the withdrawal/recall)
Best Practice
Enforcement Authorities
35. The main role of enforcement authorities is to protect public health and verify
FBO compliance with food law. Enforcement authorities are responsible for:
• setting up and implementing a documented procedure for dealing with
food incidents within their area;
• providing advice to FBOs in a timely manner to assist in risk
assessment and control measures regarding the food safety incident;
• providing advice on withdrawal/recall actions to be taken;
• checking that FBOs have removed affected food from sale and have
issued a consumer notification to recall any affected food that has been
sold to consumers, as appropriate;
• liaising with the primary/home authority, if appropriate, in exercising
regulatory functions;
24
• overseeing the re-working/re-labelling or disposal of the unsafe food (in
line with the requirements laid down in the Food Law Code of Practice 8
or the Manual of Official Controls9 (or equivalent);
• notifying FSA/FSS, when required, via FSA/FSS incidents team
mailbox, direct contact or FSA/FSS website10;
• ensuring that FBOs take action in accordance with any advice issued
by FSA/ FSS;
• verifying that food businesses have carried out a review to determine
the cause of the food safety incident and have implemented corrective
actions that are shared with FSA/FSS.
8
England Food Law CoP - https://signin.riams.org/files/display_inline/45497
Wales Food Law CoP - https://signin.riams.org/files/display_inline/48645/Wales-Food-Law-Code-of-Practice---August-2018-
02082018.pdf
NI Food Law CoP – https://signin.riams.org/files/display_inline/45498
FSS Food Law CoP – http://www.foodstandards.gov.scot/publications-and-research/food-law-code-of-practice-2015
9
FSA England and Wales MOC - https://www.food.gov.uk/business-guidance/manual-for-official-controls
DAERA VPHP MOC - https://www.daera-ni.gov.uk/publications/manual-official-controls-vphp
FSS MOC - https://www.foodstandards.gov.scot/publications-and-research/publications/manual-for-official-controls
10
England - FoodIncidents@food.gov.uk / Tel: 020 7276 8448, Wales - Wales.FoodIncidents@food.gov.uk / Tel: 02920 678961,
NI - incidents.ni@food.gov.uk / Tel: 02890 417700, Scotland - incidents@fss.scot / Tel: 01224 288379
FSA website - http://www.food.gov.uk/enforcement/enforcework/report
FSS website - http://www.foodstandards.gov.scot/business-and-industry/safety-and-regulation/food-incidents
11
Regulation (EC) No. 882/2004 on official controls performed to ensure the verification of compliance with feed and food law,
animal health and animal welfare rules - https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02004R0882-
20180701&qid=1545159845271&from=EN
25
• act as a key point of contact in respect of a Primary/Home Authority
partner FBO and source of information for FBOs, co-ordinators and
local authorities;
• provide support to local authorities to determine actions to be taken
when dealing with food incidents;
• guide local authorities on how they interact with partnering FBOs.
38. FSA and FSS have the responsibility for public health protection and are the
central competent authority for food safety in the UK. FSA and FSS have a
role in:
• co-ordinating national and international food withdrawals/recalls – being
the central point of contact;
• co-ordinating activities in the case of unsafe food being exported from
the UK to other countries;
• liaising with relevant enforcement authorities/primary authority
regarding food withdrawals/recalls;
• liaising with other relevant stakeholders, as required, during food
incidents;
• overseeing the risk assessment and risk management of food safety
incidents, where appropriate;
• providing information to the public about the food recall on its website,
via email/SMS alert and social media;
• where appropriate, providing information to the public about a food
safety withdrawal.
Consumer organisations
26
Food withdrawal/recall plan
41. There are a number of actions that often need to be carried out simultaneously
during a food withdrawal/recall, so advance planning is essential.
42. A withdrawal/recall plan can help FBOs when dealing with food incidents. It
can include procedures and documentation that can facilitate an effective food
withdrawal/recall.
Best Practice
43. Depending on the size and complexity of the food business, there may be one
or more people involved in dealing with food withdrawals/recalls. The following
areas of the business could be represented, where applicable:
• business owner;
• production;
• quality/technical;
• engineering/maintenance;
• planning;
• purchasing;
• accounts;
27
• sales/marketing;
• legal;
• distribution;
• public relations/media.
44. It may be the case that some of the above inputs will be provided from outside
the business, e.g. legal advice and expert technical help. The team will be
responsible for managing food withdrawals/recalls and developing,
implementing, managing, evaluating and updating the withdrawal/recall plan.
45. To ensure the effective withdrawal/recall of unsafe food, all team members
involved in managing food incidents should be clear about their roles and
responsibilities, which can be detailed in the food withdrawal/recall plan. An
example diagram is outlined in Annexe G.
Best Practice
Contacts list
46. It is important that an up to date contact list of internal and external contacts is
maintained in the food withdrawal/recall plan. FBOs should take into account
data protection requirements for obtaining, storing, handling and disposing of
personal data.
47. The following contact details are examples of what should be recorded (main
contacts plus deputies):
• senior management;
• team members dealing with food incidents;
• suppliers of all food products;
• business customers;
• hauliers/depots/cold stores;
28
• sources of technical advice and support;
• enforcement authorities;
• consumer organisations.
48. It is often the case that food incidents occur outside of normal business hours,
so it would also be helpful to retain out of hours contact details. An example
contact list is outlined in Annexe H.
Notification procedures
Best Practice
12
https://www.allergyuk.org/
13
https://www.anaphylaxis.org.uk/
14
https://www.coeliac.org.uk/home/
29
Notification to enforcement authorities
51. FBOs must notify enforcement authorities and FSA/FSS. Support and advice
from the authorities will be advantageous to the business from the outset of a
food incident. The following information should be provided by the FBO:
• food business details;
• description of food safety incident;
• description of product, including:
- type of product;
- product name;
- brand name;
- batch codes/durability dates;
- product size and type of packaging;
- country of origin of the product;
• distribution details, including:
- manufacturers details, import and export details, where applicable;
- list of business customers supplied to;
- quantities, batch codes and pack sizes sent to each business
customer;
- when first placed on the market and whether the food has reached
consumers;
• actions taken or proposed.
NOTE: Notification should not be delayed if all information is not readily
available.
15
http://incidents.foodapps.co.uk/login.aspx
16
https://www.foodstandards.gov.scot/business-and-industry/scottish-food-crime-and-incidents-unit/food-incidents/reporting-a-
food-incident-guidance
30
Notification to suppliers and business customers
53. FBOs must notify suppliers and affected business customers of the food
incident and the actions to be taken in handling the affected food (e.g. return or
destroy). Procedures should be set up to outline methods of communication to
ensure that unsafe food is removed from the supply chain and recalled from
consumers if it has been sold. See Annexe J for best practice guidance on
trade notifications.
Notification to consumers
Where an unsafe product may have reached the consumer, the FBO
must effectively and accurately inform the consumers of the reason for
its withdrawal, and if necessary, recall from consumers products
already supplied to them.
54. If FBOs identify or have reason to believe that unsafe food has reached
consumers, they are required to accurately inform consumers of the reasons
for its removal from the market and the action to be taken. Information
provided to consumers should be accurate and the communication method
effective in informing them of the food recall and action to take. See Annexe K
for key principles and best practice templates that may be used by FBOs when
communicating with consumers.
55. A food incident log is a useful document for food businesses to capture all
relevant information regarding a food withdrawal/recall. An example log can be
found in Annexe L.
Best Practice
31
Review and testing of food withdrawal/recall plan
56. A way of ensuring that suitable systems and procedures are in place to deal
with a food safety incident is to carry out a periodic review and testing of the
plan and procedures.
Best Practice
57. Once a decision has been made to initiate a food withdrawal/recall there are a
number of key aspects that need to be considered to manage this process,
including:
• information management;
• monitoring progress of a food withdrawal/recall;
• closing a food withdrawal/recall;
• media management;
• handling of the unsafe food;
• reviewing the food withdrawal/recall; and
• RCA.
Information Management
58. It is essential for FBOs to gather information regarding the food safety
incident, including food details, the nature of the hazard and the extent of the
problem so that effective decisions can be made.
59. This information can come from a variety of sources, both internal and external,
including:
• production records;
• sales records;
• employees;
32
• suppliers;
• business customers;
• audit;
• sampling analysis;
• complaints; and
• enforcement authorities.
60. FBOs should collate the relevant information and keep it together as it may be
requested by the enforcement authority. It is important to ensure adequate
back up of stored information.
61. In order to monitor the progress of the withdrawal/ recall, FBOs should attempt
to reconcile food removed from the market against known quantities of affected
food distributed. By monitoring the quantity of product removed from the
market this will give information about any additional actions that may be
required to re-iterate the messages or to indicate when the withdrawal/ recall
has been completed.
62. FBOs should keep enforcement authorities and business customers updated
throughout the incident.
63. FBOs should work with enforcement authorities in determining when a food
withdrawal/recall can be closed, but consideration should be given to the level
of public health risk and the mitigating action that has been taken to protect this
risk.
64. FBOs will benefit from formally closing the withdrawal/recall and advising the
enforcement authority that the incident has ended and the reason for closure.
65. After a food withdrawal/recall, FBOs may have unsafe food that will need to be
dealt with.
66. To ensure the control of unsafe food, FBOs should consider the following:
33
• keeping unsafe food at a central site;
• storing unsafe food away from non-affected food in a quarantined area;
• labelling of quarantined food; and
• maintaining accurate traceability and disposal records of recovered unsafe
food.
Making unsafe food safe
67. It may be possible for FBOs to re-work or re-label unsafe food that enables it to
become compliant with food law. FBOs should seek agreement from their
enforcement authority before any food that has been previously recalled or
withdrawn is re-worked or re-labelled.
68. If it is not possible to make the unsafe food safe, it will be determined as food
waste. If the unsafe food contains POAO, FBOs should be aware of the
requirements laid down in the Animal By-Product Regulations17.
69. Waste must be clearly identified and disposed of in a secure and controlled
manner, in accordance with Animal By-Products Regulations or other relevant
waste disposal legislation. FBOs should have regard to any required
certification that needs completing.
70. For more information on the disposal of waste, please contact the relevant
waste enforcement body.18
71. FBOs may wish to seek advice from their enforcement authority regarding the
handling of withdrawn or recalled food.
72. Each food withdrawal/recall that is initiated must be reviewed to assess the
effectiveness of the FBO’s actions. If a food business has developed a food
withdrawal/recall plan the review may be done in accordance with its review
procedure, but should consider:
34
• robustness of the withdrawal/recall plan and procedures;
• effectiveness of communications;
• timeliness of actions taken;
• roles and responsibilities;
• incident log;
• appraisal of decisions made;
• timelines;
• future improvements.
Root Cause Analysis
73. Following a food safety incident, FBOs are advised to undertake a RCA to
determine the reason(s) why the food withdrawal or recall occurred. This will
enable the identification of corrective actions which, in turn, will help to mitigate
reoccurrence of the food safety incident.
74. RCA is a method that can be used to determine how and why food safety
issues occur, allowing more effective long-term preventative actions to be
identified and applied. The analysis performed should identify the initial cause
that led to the food withdrawal/recall and the stage at which intervention could
be implemented to prevent future recurrence.
Best Practice
Different tools can be used when performing RCA, the oldest, and
perhaps simplest, is the ‘5 whys’. The development of this process was
originally attributed to Sakichi Toyoda, and later utilised by the Toyota
Motor Corporation. This technique requires an investigator to ask a series
of ‘why’ questions. Each time a cause is identified, the question ‘why did it
happen?’ is applied until the root cause is identified.
The findings of the RCA can be used to review the business’s Food Safety
Management System (FSMS) to ensure that it remains appropriate and
effective. The FSMS is a is a holistic system of prevention, preparedness
and own-check activities to manage food safety and hygiene in a food
business, including the traceability and recall of unsafe food.
35
Annexe A: Food Recalls Steering Group and Working Group
Members
36
Annexe B: Definitions
This annexe includes extended and legal definitions of those terms set out in the guidance
document and definitions of other key terms.
‘consumer’ means the ultimate consumer of a foodstuff who will not use the food as part
of any food business operation or activity;
‘business customer’ means a food business who buys food from another food business;
‘durability date’** means the date of minimum durability of a food until which the food
retains its specific properties when properly stored;
(a) feed;
(b) live animals unless they are prepared for placing on the market for human
consumption;
(d) medicinal products within the meaning of Council Directives 65/65/EEC and
92/73/EEC;
(f) tobacco and tobacco products within the meaning of Council Directive 89/622/EEC;
37
(g) narcotic or psychotropic substances within the meaning of the United Nations Single
Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961, and the United Nations Convention on Psychotropic
Substances, 1971;
- 'prepacked food' means food and the packaging into which it was put before being
offered for sale, whether such packaging encloses the food completely or only
partially, but in any event in such a way that the contents cannot be altered without
opening or changing the packaging;
- 'prepacked for direct sale' means food that is packed at the same premises from
which it is being sold;
- 'loose food' means food that is sold or displayed without packaging - for example,
ice cream displayed in a freezer and served into a tub;
‘food business’* means any undertaking, whether for profit or not and whether public or
private, carrying out any of the activities related to any stage of production, processing and
distribution of food;
‘food business operator’* (FBO) means the natural or legal persons responsible for
ensuring that the requirements of food law are met within the food business under their
control;
‘food incident’ means any event where, based on the information available, there are
concerns about actual or suspected threats to the safety, quality or integrity of food that
could require intervention to protect consumers' interests;
‘food law’* means the laws, regulations and administrative provisions governing food in
general, and food safety in particular, whether at Community or national level; it covers any
stage of production, processing and distribution of food;
‘food withdrawal/recall plan’ means a written document detailing a food business’ food
withdrawal/recall system for withdrawing or recalling unsafe food;
‘foreign object’ means something that is found in a food product but does not belong
there, making it unsafe;
‘hazard’ means an allergenic, biological, chemical or physical agent in, or condition of,
food with the potential to cause an adverse health effect;
38
‘market’ means all parts of the supply chain where an affected food may be located;
‘non-compliant’ means food that does not comply with food law or customer specification,
but is not necessarily unsafe;
‘placing on the market’* means the holding of food for the purpose of sale, including
offering for sale or any other form of transfer, whether free of charge or not, and the sale,
distribution, and other forms of transfer themselves;
‘product batch’ means a defined quantity of product processed in one process or series
of processes so that it could be expected to be homogeneous;
‘recall’ means the process by which food is removed from the supply chain and
consumers are advised to take appropriate action, for example to return or dispose of
food;
‘retail’* means the handling and/or processing of food and its storage at the point of sale
or delivery to the final consumer, and includes distribution terminals, catering operations,
factory canteens, institutional catering, restaurants and other similar food service
operations, shops, supermarket distribution centres and wholesale outlets;
‘risk assessment’* means a scientifically based process consisting of four steps: hazard
identification, hazard characterisation, exposure assessment and risk characterisation;
39
‘risk management’* means the process, distinct from risk assessment, of weighing policy
alternatives in consultation with interested parties, considering risk assessment and other
legitimate factors, and, if need be, selecting appropriate prevention and control options;
‘root cause analysis’ (RCA) means an assessment to determine the main cause of the
food safety incident;
‘sprouted seeds’ means the product obtained from the germination of seeds and their
development in water or another medium, harvested before the development of true
leaves and which is intended to be eaten whole, including the seed;
‘traceability’* means the ability to trace and follow a food, feed, food-producing animal or
substance intended to be, or expected to be incorporated into a food or feed, through all
stages of production, processing and distribution;
‘unsafe food’ means food that is injurious to health or unfit for human consumption, as
described in Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No. 178/2002;
‘waste’† means any substance or object that the holder discards, intends to discard or is
required to discard;
‘withdrawal’ means the process by which a food is removed from the supply chain, where
suspect food has not yet reached the consumer.
40
Annexe C: Example food traceability documents
Date of Details of Name and Name of Quantity Unit of Batch codes/ Product size
transaction/ food item address of address of measure durability
delivery supplier business dates
customer
41
Annexe D: Specific food traceability requirements
Sprouted seeds
NOTE: This additional information is not required for sprouted seeds after they have
undergone a treatment that eliminates microbiological hazards.
(ii) the consignor (owner) if different from the FBO from which the seeds or
sprouts have been dispatched
• the name and address of the FBO to whom the seeds or sprouts are dispatched (if
applicable);
• the name and address of the consignee (owner), if different from the FBO to whom
the seeds or sprouts are dispatched (if applicable);
• a reference identifying the batch, as appropriate; and
• the date of dispatch (if applicable).
Traceability information of products of animal origin and sprouted seeds must be updated
daily.
42
Annexe E: Identifying unsafe food
To determine if a food is unsafe FBOs may wish to consider the following questions:
43
Annexe F: Risk assessment considerations
NOTE: this is not an exhaustive list of all points that need to be included in a risk
assessment and not all points may be applicable/relevant, as it will depend on the type of
food safety incident.
Hazard identification
Exposure Assessment
• the population at risk and whether any particular groups, including vulnerable
groups, are of particular concern;
• dose consumed;
• prevalence of contamination in the batch;
• shelf-life of product(s) involved and potential for frozen storage which would extend
shelf-life;
• any cooking instructions and whether these would be sufficient to destroy the
hazard;
• any other processing or handling of the product which could increase or decrease
risk;
• cross-contamination potential;
• distribution; large or small scale, and types of establishments the affected food
product is sent to;
• quantities of the affected food product that has been sold/used;
• possibility of other batches or products being affected.
Hazard characterisation
44
• the probability and severity of illness or injury occurring, taking into account the
given population(s);
• list of uncertainties.
45
Annexe G: Example roles and responsibilities chart for a Food
Business incidents team
- Identify batch
Production - Cease production
- Identify raw materials affected/implicated
- Identify finished products affected
46
Annexe H: Example contact list for a food business
withdrawal/recall plan
Mobile:
Mobile:
Mobile:
Mobile:
47
Annexe I: Example template for notifying the enforcement
authority
Name of FBO
48
Description of product
Type of Product:
Product Name:
Brand Name:
49
Country of Origin of food:
4. Distribution details:
50
Quantities, batch codes and pack sizes sent to each business customer:
When food first placed on the market and has food reached consumer?
51
Annexe J: Business-to-business communications for food
safety withdrawals and recalls across the supply chain
Overview
Effective communication within the supply chain is essential for ensuring a successful food
withdrawal/recall. Each point in the supply chain has a responsibility for effective and
timely communications to their business suppliers and business customers.
It is key for FBOs to have a good communications plan in place to ensure the intended
audience is reached.
• clear;
• factual;
• easily understood; and
• include the relevant action to take.
Audience
The audience for this best-practice guidance is food businesses trading with business
customers (i.e. businesses purchasing and supplying food for sale to consumers in store
or online). The guidance applies at each point in the supply chain when food is being
withdrawn for food safety reasons and when food is ultimately being recalled from the
consumer.
Examples of food business operators (FBOs) that would initiate communications regarding
food withdrawals/recalls include:
52
• national accounts;
• third party agencies;
• exporters where affected product may go for export or sale in third countries.
All FBOs should maintain an up to date and comprehensive list of relevant trade contacts
to use in the event that a withdrawal or recall needs to be initiated.
The point of contact at each business customer will differ but could include:
• business owner;
• responsible senior managers;
• technical services;
• account managers;
• third party agent.
FBOs initiating the withdrawal/recall should use traceability and/or sales information to
help identify suppliers of (if relevant) and those business customers who have received
affected product.
A communications plan, which can form part of the business’s withdrawal/recall plan,
should be put in place setting out which business customers will be contacted, how they
will be contacted and with what messages, including the relevant action to take.
This plan should identify what information is to be provided to business customers, where
it is available and should include, where appropriate:
53
• contact details – who to contact for more information, or where to return affected
product.
FBOs should also advise their business customers that where there is further onward
distribution of affected product, they should communicate to their own customers that a
withdrawal/recall is underway and request that appropriate action is taken to cascade the
withdrawal/recall action.
Communication should be clear, concise, factual and easily understood, using pictures
where possible, showing the product packaging and the location of the product identifying
code.
Communications could be direct or via a third-party agency. A single approach may not be
effective in all cases.
• email (if email is being used for communication, read receipts should be turned on);
• telephone (if supported by one of the other methods of communication);
• letter;
• via trade association.
54
ACTION REQUIRED
55
Ask for the Withdrawal Team on 020 124 4567
PRODUCTA@PRODUCTA.CO.UK
A clear plan should be in place by business customers which can be used should a
withdrawal or recall need to be actioned.
• email (if email is being used for communication, read receipts should be turned on);
• telephone (if supported by one of the other methods of communication);
• letter;
• advertisement in trade press (only as a supporting mechanism);
• signage at point of sale in depot.
FBOs who are notified of a food withdrawal/recall should also advise their business
customers that where there is further onward distribution of affected product, they should
communicate to their own customers that a withdrawal/recall is underway, and that
appropriate action is required to cascade the communication.
Dear x
(Company or Brand Name) are currently initiating a Product Withdrawal/Recall* for the
Product A 100g. You have been identified as purchasing/receiving the affected products.
No other products from Company or Brand Name are affected by this withdrawal/recall*.
56
Product Name and Description
Product A
(including pack size):
Supplier: Product A
Pallet
Batch Code (and location on
Case
case/consumer unit):
Pack
57
Annexe K: Key Principles and Best Practice Template for
accurate and effective consumer recall notifications
Businesses are recommended to follow this guidance when communicating food recalls to
consumers.
Research has established that there are a number of ways to communicate food recall
messages to consumers, so that they can make informed choices about products they
have bought which are unsafe. The different aspects to consider in creating effective recall
messages to consumers include:
Point of sale notices have been identified through the research as a key way of
communicating food recalls to consumers and should therefore also take the following into
consideration.
Communication that grabs the attention of consumers makes it easier for them to identify
what the communication is and what it means for them.
58
Necessary Content
Communicating the right information will help consumers clearly identify the unsafe
product and what to do if they have bought it.
The reason for recall - Use clear title to indicate what this is
and what the danger or risk to
consumers is
- Pack size(s)
- Batch code(s)
59
The research conducted has shown consumers prefer language that is simple and easily
understood. Examples of suggested wording include the following:
There will be occasions when food is recalled because the food business has reason to
believe that food placed on the market is unsafe, but there are uncertainties as follows:
- the recall is being undertaken on the basis of a presumptive (and not confirmed)
result;
- there are issues which reduce the confidence in sampling or laboratory analysis;
and/or
- there is uncertainty around contamination of all recalled batches.
In these instances, the food business may wish to use wording as indicated below:
60
Possible contamination of product with “X product” is being recalled which may
foreign objects contain “foreign object”
The wording advice stated above should not be used in any incident where product is
known to be contaminated. This includes product being recalled as part of a batch that is
considered unsafe, in line with the Article 14 (6) of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002.
- Eye-level
- At the tills
61
62
63
Annexe L: Example food incident log
64
Annexe M: Background to Root Cause Analysis
Root Cause Analysis (RCA) is based on the principle that problems are best solved by
attempting to eliminate the root causes of an outcome, as opposed to merely addressing
the immediately obvious symptoms.
If performed successfully, RCA identifies the initiating cause in a causal chain which leads
to an outcome or effect of interest. Commonly, root cause is used to describe the depth in
the causal chain where an intervention could reasonably be implemented to change
performance and prevent an undesirable outcome.
RCA can influence the approach to problem solving encouraging desired behaviours that
are proactive rather than reactive. As such it is believed that RCA can be used to
determine how and why food safety issues occur, allowing more effective long-term
preventative actions to be identified and applied.
Different tools can be used when performing RCA, the oldest, and perhaps simplest, is the
‘5 whys’. The development of this process was originally attributed to Sakichi Toyoda, and
later utilised by the Toyota Motor Corporation, this technique requires an investigator to
ask a series of ‘why’ questions. Each time a cause is identified, the question ‘why did it
happen?’ is applied until the root cause is identified.
The principles of RCA have long been recognised in fields such as the petrochemical
industry, environmental management, aviation and vehicle accident investigation, and
engineering. Key UK governmental organisations, including the National Health Service
(NHS), the Health & Safety Executive (HSE), and the Department for Environment, Food &
Rural Affairs (DEFRA) all routinely make use of RCA. The British Retail Consortium (BRC)
also recognises the use of RCA in their Global Standard for Food Safety.
65