( )

2007 ,

1
.

2
 .
.

: : :
.

3
 .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1 . -:
1 . 1.1
2 . 2.1
3 . 3.1
4 . 4.1
4
. 5.1
5 . 6. 1
7 . -:
7 . 1.2
33 . 2.2
42 . -:
42 . 1.3
42 . 2.3
43 . 3.3

4
45 . 4 .3
47 . 5.3
47 . 6.3
47 . 7.3
48 . 8.3
50 . 9.3
51 . :
53 . 1.4
60 . 2.4
91 . :
91 . 1.5
97 . 2.5
98 3.5
100
108

5
40 1
41 2
43 3
44 4
48 5

49 6

.
50 7

51 8

52 9

53 10

6
54 11

55 12

56 (Analysis of variance) 13
.
56 Simple Regression ) 14
.( ) ( ) (Analysis
57 (Analysis of variance) 15
.
58 (Simple Regression Analysis 16
.( )
58 (Analysis of variance) 17
.
59 (Simple Regression Analysis 18
.( ) ( )
60 (Analysis of variance) 19
.
60 (Simple Regression Analysis 20
.( ) ( )

7
61 (Analysis of variance) 21
.
62 (Simple Regression Analysis 22
.( ) ( )
62 (Analysis of variance) 23
.
63 (Simple Regression Analysis 24
.( ) ( )
64 (Analysis of variance) 25
.
64 (Simple Regression Analysis 26
.( ) ( )
65 (One Way Anova) 27

66 28

67 29

69 30

70 31

8
72 32

73 (t) 33
.
74 (t) 34
.
74 35
.
75 36
.
76 37
.
78 38
.
79 39
.
80 40
.
81 41
.
82 42
.

9
11 . .1
21 . .2
25 . .3
26 . .4
47 . .5

10
100
101

11
 2007

( )

(690) %20 . ( 3450)

) (582)
(SPSS) (
:
.1

.
. .2
.3
)
.(
:

.
.

12
 Abstract

The Impact of performance Evaluation on Workers'

Motivation for Work at Health Sector in Tabuk Region in
Saudi Arabia

Oadeh Salem Ale'tewei

Mu'tah University, 2007

This study aimed to identify the impact of career performance

evaluation system through its dimensions, fairness, objectivity
effectiveness, model, technique and time suitability, on motivation of
workers at health sector in tabuk area in Saudi Arabia. A developed
questionnaire was distributed in order to achieve the objectives of the
study. The population of the study (3450) consisted of doctors, nurses,
technicians and administrators. The sample of the study consisted of (690)
subjects and selected randomly from the population of the study. The valid
returned questionnaires for statistical analysis were (582). The Simple
Regression Analysis and One- Way ANOVA from the Statistical Package
for Social Sciences (SPSS) were used to analyze data. The results of the
study were the following:
1. Employees' Attitudes towards evaluation of performances were
positive and high and the motivation level for workers was high too.
2. There was statistically significant effect of evaluating performance
on motivation for work for employees at health sector in Tabuk
region.
3. There were significant statistical differences in workers' attitudes
towards performance evaluating and motivation level in health sector
which attributed to demographic variations ( gender, age,
qualifications, experience, the nature of work, social status and
workplace).
The study has recommended a number of recommendations: the
necessity of enhancing the positive sides of the evaluation system which is
already used in health sector in Tabuk to improve and increase the workers'
satisfaction. The study recommended to computerize the career
performance evaluation system to be more accurate than the current
system.

13
 : 1 .1

.
.

.
.

.(2004 )

Sub systems –
.

. (2006 )

14
 .

.
.(2002 )

: 2 .1
,

).
(1999

) .

15
 (1995
:
.

: 3 .1
:
.1

.
.2

.
.
.3
2006

.
.4

.
.

: 4 .1

.
-1

16
.

-2

-3
.

-4
.
-5

: 5 .1
.1

.2

.3

.4

.5

17
 .6

.7

.8

6 .1

.
:

.
:

18
 .
:

.
:

)
.(
:
)
.(

19
 : 1.2

,
.

.
,
..

"
"
(87 1990 ) .(Szilagyi & Wallace, 1990,519)
"
" "

20
 .(Grote, 2000,1) "

(Dale.Lles.2002)

.
:

. .1
.2
.
. .3

.
.4
.(2002 )
:

Szilagyi & Wallace, ) :

.(1990
. -

21
. -
-
.
. -
. -
. -
-

(William, 1996)

. .1
. .2
. .3
:

: .1
.
: .2
.

(1989 ).

22
=
.(Tapinos, 2005) ×

. (1998 ).

: .1

(2002 ):

.1
.
.2
.
.3
.
. .4

23
(Moorman & Griffin, 1989)

(1)

Moorman & Griffin,1989, p134 :

. .1

.2
.

.3

24
 .

.4
.

.5
.(2002 ).

.6
.(2002 )

.2

:(2004 )

. .1
. .2
. .3
. .4

.3

:(1998 )

.1
. .2
.3
.4
.5
:

25
 .1

.2

(2004 )

.4

. .1
. .2

.5

:
. .1
. .2
.3
.
.4

: .6

(1994 )
.1
.

26
 .2
.
.3
.
.4
.
. .5
.6
.

(51934)
1401/3/6 401/7 1426/12/30
1427/1/1
(3/36) 1/12 702/1492

.
(1/36)

27
 .

: :

( 1404)
..
:
. .1
.2
:
. ()
. ( )
: .3
: .
. (13-12-11) ()
.( ) ( )
: .
. ( 13 -12 – 11) ()
.( ) ( )
: .4
. ( 13 – 12 – 11) ()
.( ) ( )
. .5
. .6
. .7

28
 . .8
.9
.
. .10

.
: :
:

.( 2004 )

.
( 13 – 11)

29
 ( 2004 )

.
: :

.( 2004 ).
: :

( )
:
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5

30
 :

(Mover)

.(1993 )

.(1995 )

: (2000 )

.(Michael,2004).

: (Robbins,2001)

:
.(Steers&et.al,2002) .

31
 .

, :
.
.. . (Tension)

(2003 ).

.
.

:
,
,
.(1995 )" , ,

(Material Incentives)
Non- Material )
. (Incentives

– –

32
 ,
.
(Hidden Potential)
.(2000 )

(Motivation Process) :

.(Thoms,1993)

(2)
- –

- -

.
.(2003 )

33
 )
( )

(2)

: (2003 ) :
.105 1

(1993 ) -:

-
.(Inference)
-
.
. -
(Goal Orienated Behaviour) -

.
. (1997 )

34
 .(2002 ):

(Primary Motives) .1

.
.
:

. (Unlearned) -
(Physiologically) -

(Secondary Motives) .2

.
.
, .
.(Luthans,1992) .
:

.
.

: (Scholl, 2002)

(Intrinsic Process Motivation) -1

35
 (Instrumental Motivation) : -2

. ...
External Basd Motivation) -3
(Self Concept
.
Internal Self Concept Basd ) -4
. (Motivation
(Goal Internaliation) -5
.
:

.
.
.
:(Vroom) ( ) (Expecteucy Theory ) :

) .
. (2003

36
 .1
.
: .2
.
.3
.

.
.
(1999 ): – –
. .1
.2
.
: ( Hierarchy Nxeds Maslow) :
" "
. (2004 )
: .1
.
: .2

.
: .3
.
: .4
.

37
 .5

.
. (1997 )

(1998 ):

(3)
.
Al-) (ERG Theroy of Motivations) :
(Derfer

(C. Al-Derfer)" "

38
 " " " "
. (2004 )
.1

.
.2
.
.3
.

(2004 ):

(4)
.

(Two Factors Theroy of Motivations) :

: (Herzberg)
"

" "

39
 (1998 ).

. (1997 ).

.(1999 ).
(Y X ) (Douglas Mc Gregor) :

" "
(X)
" " (Y)

. (2003 ).
(X)
:(2004 )
.1
.

40
 .2
.
.3
.
(X)

,
" "
(Y)
) (Y)
: (2001
. .1
.2

.
.3
.
.4
.
.5
.
.6

41
 : (Stacy Adams) ( ) (Equity Theroy) :
1963 ( )

( ) ( )
.

.(2004 ).
:

.(Organ & Bateman, 1991)

: ( 2000 )
,
:

(Cherrington, 1994 ) .(1995 )

.( ) "
(Greenberg & Robert, 1997))
:

42
.
: (1995 )

.
: (2003 )
. ( , )

:
.- - -1
. -2
. -3
(Greenberg & Robert, 1997)

(Cherrington, 1994)

:
-1
.

43
 -2

.
-3

.
:

: -1
.
: -2
.
. -3

.
.( 2005 )

: 2.2

:
" (2006 )
"

.
:

44
 .
.

.
( 2006)
McClelland
.

.( , , )
:
,
.
: . (345)

.
" (2006 )
"

(1831)
:
-1

45
 .
-2
)
(
.
" (2005 )
"

. (357)

.
.
" (2004 )

"

. (483)

46
.
.
" " (2004 )

(323) .

.
" : (2003 )
"

.
" (2002 )
(2000) "

( )

47
 .
" (2001 )
"

:
-1
.
-2

.
" (2000)
"

.
" (1999)

48
:
"

.
(1994)

.
(1991)

.
(1991)

49
 :

:
" (Ubom& Joshua,2004)
."
.

.
.
" (Bradley 2003)
"

.
(Kleemann & Matuschek, 2002)
":
". :

50
 ,
.

.
(Fok, 2000 )
.
(85)

.
: (Egan 1994)

(362)
. (10)

.
:

51
 .

.
.

.
.

52
 : 1 .3

(Spss)
.

: 2 .3

( )
.(2007 ) (3450)
.
(1)
.

101 123
112 129
252 289
117 135
582 690

: 3 .3

53
 . (%20)
(40) (10) .
5 (10) (20)
(690) . (18)
(29) (611)
(582)
(%84.3) (%16.87)
(2 )
.
(2)

%58.1 338
%41.9 244

%19.2 112 30
%37.5 218 40- 31
%30.6 178 50- 41
%12.7 74 51

%14.8 86
%32.1 187
%48.3 281
%4.8 28

%63.9 372
%25.6 149
%10.5 61

%17.35 101
%19.24 112
%43.30 252
%20.10 117

%12.4 72 5
%35.1 204 10-6
%21.1 123 15- 11
17.3 100 20- 16
%20 83 20
%14
%22.3 130
%77 , 7 452

(2)

54
 (%41.9) (%58.1)
.

(%22.3) (%77.7)
.

40-31)
51) (%37.5) (
. (%12.7) (

(%48.3)
(%32.1)
(%14.8)
.(%4.8)

(%35.1) ( 15-11)
.(%12.4) ( 5)

(%63.9)
(%25.6)
.(%10.5)

(%43.30)
(%19.24) (%20.10)
.(%17.35)

: 4 .3
"
: "

55
 :
):
.(
:
) (2004 )
(1999 )(2005
):

.(
:
(3) .(Bradley, 2003)
:
(3)

38-1
7-1
13-8
19-14
25-20
32-26
38-33
49-39

(1) (5-1)
(3) (2)
. (5) (4)
(3.6)
(3.5-2.5)

56
 (2.49)
.

: 5 .3

(5)

: 6 .3
(Cronbach Alpha )

: (4)
(4)

( )
0.90 38-1
0.88 7-1
0.89 13-8
0.84 19-14
0.91 25-20
0.86 32-26
0.83 38-33
0.91 49-39
0.93 49-1

(4)

57
 : 7 .3

(spss.10)
:
-1

.
Simple Regression Analysis -2
.
(One Way ANOVA) -3
.

. 8 .3
: -1

.
: -2

.
. -3

58
 . (650 :2005 )
-4

. (66 :2004 )
: -5

.(Foote, et.al, 2005)

: -6

.
Fenton-).
(LeShore, 2004
: -7

(2005 ).
: -8

.
.(Robbins,1993)

59
 9 .3

(5)

60
 .

: 1 .4

:
(5)

1 %76 0.51 3.8 7-1

2 %74 0.64 3.7 13-8
4 %70 0.62 3.5 19- 14
3 %72 0.66 3.6 25- 20
3 %72 0.56 3.6 32- 26
4 %70 0.68 3.5 38- 33
- %72 0.52 3.6 38-1

(5)
)

61
 (0.52) (3.6)
(3.8)
(3.7)
(3.6)
(3.6)
(3.5)
.(3.5)

: .

(6 )

%78 0.94 3.9

1 .1
.
%78 0.98 3.9
2 .2
.
%76 0.96 3.8
3 .3

%76 0.90 3.8

3 .4
.
%72 0.97 3.6
4 .5

%72 0.99 3.6

5 .6

%76 0.89 3.8

3 .7

- %76 0.51 3.8 7-1

(6)

62
(3.8)
) (4) (0.5)
(
) (5) (3.9)
(
(3.6)
.
: .

(7)

%76 0.94 3.8

1 .8

%74 0.96 3.7

2 .9

%74 0.98 3.7

2 .10

%72 0.99 3.6

3 .11

%74 0.91 3.7

2 .12

%74 0.97 3.7

2 .13

%74 - 0.59 3.7 13-8

(7)

(3.7)

63
 ) (8) (0.59)
(
) (11) (3.8)
(
(3.6)
.
: .

(8)

%70 0.96 3.5

2 .14

%72 0.94 3.6

1 .15

%70 1.00 3.5

2 .16

%70 1.01 3.5

2 .17
.
%70 0.97 3.5
2 .18

%70 0.99 3.5

2 .19

- %70 0.62 3.5 19-14

(8)

(3.5)
) (15) (0.62)

64
(
(19) (3.6)
)
.(3.6) (
: .

(9 )

3 %70 0.92 3.5 . .26

3 %70 0.96 3.5 . .27
%72 0.94 3.6
2 .28
.
1 %74 1.01 3.7 . .29
%70 0.97 3.5
3 .30
.
%70 0.98 3.5
3 .31
.
%72 0.94 3.6

2 .32
.
- %72 0.56 3.6 32-26

(9)

(3.6)
) (29) (0.56)
(3.7) (
( ) (27)

65
 .(3.5)
: .

(10)

%70 0.95 3.5

2 .33

2 %70 0.96 3.5 .34

%74 0.91 3.7
1 .35

%64 1.06 3.2

4 .36

%70 0.98 3.5

2 .37

%68 1.05 3.4

3 .38

- %70 0.58 3.5 38-33

(10)

(3.5)
) (35) (0.58)
(
) (36) (3.7)
(
.(3.2)

66
 :

(11)

%70 0.99 3.5

2 .20

%70 1.02 3.5

2 .21

%70 0.98 3.5

2 .22

1 %72 0.94 3.6 .23

%72 0.99 3.6
1 .24
.
%70 1.01 3.5
2 .25

- %70 0.60 3.5 25-20

(11)

(3.5)
( ) (23) (0.60)
) (21) (3.6)
(
.(3.5)

67
 :

(12)

%70 1.08 3.5

5 .39

3 %74 1.00 3.7 .40

%74 0.90 3.7
3 .41

%70 0.96 3.5

5 .42

%74 0.90 3.7

3 .43

%70 0.99 3.5

5 .44

3 %74 0.89 3.7 .45

2 %76 0.96 3.8 .46
3 %74 0.92 3.7 .47
2 %76 1.05 3.8 .48
%78 1.00 3.9
1 .49

- %74 0.55 3.7 49-39

(12)

(3.7)
) (49) (0.55)
(3.9) (
) (39)
(
.(3.5)

68
 : 2 .4
:

.
(13)
(Analysis Of variance)
.
F F
76.010 76.010 1
0.000 *417.9 0.182 105.480 580
181.490 581
(α = 0.05) *
0.419 = (R2)

(13)
(F=417.9) (F)
(α=0.05) (α=0.000)
( ) (%41.9)

(14)
(Simple Regression Analysis)
.( ) ( )

T T Beta B

0.000 *20.44 0.631 0.043 0.682

(α = 0.05) *

(14)

69
 (20.44) (T)
(581) (α = 0.01)
"

."
"
."

.
(15)
(Analysis Of variance)
.
F F
40.392 40.392 1
0.000 *166.03 0.243 141.099 580
181.490 581
(α = 0.05) *
0.223 = (R2)

(15)
(F=166.03) (F)
(α=0.05) (α=0.000)
) (%22.3)
(

70
 (16)
(Simple Regression Analysis)
.( ) ( )

T T Beta B
0.000 *12.89 0.472 0.044 0.501

(α = 0.05) *

(16)

(T)
(581) (α = 0.01) (12.89)

"

" ."

."

.
(17)
(Analysis Of variance)
.
F F
35.283 35.283 1
0.000 *139.97 0.252 146.207 580
181.490 581
(α=0.05) *
0.194 = (R ) 2

71
 (17)
(F=139.97) (F)
(α=0.05) (α=0.000)
) (%19.4)
(

(18)
(Simple Regression Analysis)
.( ) ( )

T T Beta B

0.000 *11.83 0.429 0.041 0.486

(α = 0.05) *

(18)

(11.83) (T)
(581) (α = 0.01)
"

" ."

."

72
 :

.
(19)
(Analysis Of variance)
.
F F
54.840 54.840 1
0.000 *251.14 0.218 126.650 580
181.490 581
(α=0.05) *
0.302 = (R )
2

(19)
(F=251.14) (F)
(α=0.05) (α=0.000)
( ) (%30.2)

(20)
(Simple Regression Analysis)
.( ) ( )

T T Beta B

0.000 *15.85 0.543 0.045 0.598

(α = 0.05) *

(20)

(T)

73
(581) (α = 0.01) (15.85)

.
(21)
(Analysis Of variance)
.
F F
59.300 59.300 1
0.000 *281.48 0.211 122.190 580
181.490 581

(α=0.05) *
0.327 = (R )
2

(21)
(F=281.48) (F)
(α=0.05) (α=0.000)
) (%32.7)
(

74
 (22)
(Simple Regression Analysis)
.( ) ( )

T T Beta B
0.000 *16.78 0.568 0.040 0.598

(α = 0.05) *

(22)

(T)
(581) (0.01=α) (16.78)
"

."
"

."

.
(23)
(Analysis Of variance)
.
F F
71.248 71.248 1
0.000 *374.84 0.190 110.243 580
181.490 581
(α=0.05) *
0.393 = (R ) 2

75
 (23)
(F=374.84) (F)
(α=0.05) (α=0.000)
(%39.3)
( )

(24)
(Simple Regression Analysis)
.( ) ( )

T
T Beta B

0.000 *19.36 0.623 0.0.44 0.632

(α = 0.05) *

(24)

(α = 0.01) (19.36) (T)

" (581)

."
"

."

76
 :

.
(25)
(Analysis Of variance)
.
F F
49.959 49.959 1
0.000 *220.30 0.227 131.532 580
181.490 581
(α=0.05) *
0.275 = (R )
2

(25)
(F=220.30) (F)
(α=0.05) (α=0.000)
( ) (%27.5)

(26)
(Simple Regression Analysis)
.( ) ( )

T
T Beta B

0.000 *14.80 0.518 0.042 0.0.562

(α = 0.05) *

(26)

(T)

77
 (581) (α = 0.01) (14.80)
"

."
"
."

)
.(
(27)
(One Way Anova)

(F)

0.000 *8.98 2.405 7.215 (378 3)

0.268 154.739

0.001 *6.89 1.882 3.764 (579 2)

0.273 158.190

0.000 *11.36 3.007 9.020 (378 3)

0.265 152.935

0.000 *16.91 4.249 16.995 (377 4)

0.251 144.959

0.000 *18.45 4.718 14.154 (378 3)

0.256 147.800

( α=0.05) *

:
:" "

(27)
( )

78
 (α=0.000) (F=8.98)
(α =0.05)
.

(28)
( 30)
( 30) ( 51)
(3.94) ( 51) (3.60)
.( 51)
( 51) ( 40-31)
51) (3.65) ( 40-31)
.( 51) (3.94) (
( 50-41)
( 50-41) ( 51)
(3.94) ( 51) (3.73)
.( 51)
(28)

51
50- 41 40- 31 30

*0.34 - - - 3.60 30
*0.29 - - - 3.65 40- 31
*0.21 - - - 3.73 50- 41
- - - - 3.94 51
(α=0.05) *

79
 :
" "

(27)
( )
(α=0.000) (F=6.89)
(α =0.05)
.

.
(29)
( )
( )
(3.93)( )
.( ) (3.67) ( )
( )
( )
(3.93)( )
(3.73) ( )
.( )
(29)

- - *0.26 3.93
- - *0.20 3.73
- - - 3.67
(α=0.05) *

80
 :
" "

(27)
( )
(α=0.000) (F=11.36)
(α =0.05)
.

(30)
( )
( )
(3.49) ( )
(3.86) ( )
.( )
( ) ( )
(3.49) ( )
(3.78) ( )
.( )
( )
( ) ( )
( ) (3.49)
.( ) (3.69)

81
 (30)

- *0.20 *0.29 *0.37 3.86

- - - - 3.78
- - - - 3.69
- - - - 3.49

(α=0.05) *

:
." "

(27)
( )
(α=0.000) (F=16.91)
. (α =0.05)

(31)

( 5) ( 21)
( 5) (3.87) ( 21)
.( 21) (3.44)
21)
( 10-6) (

82
 ( 10-6) (3.87) ( 21)
.( 21) (3.64)
20-16)
( 5) (
(3.44) ( 5) (3.74) ( 20-16)
.( 20-16)

( 5) ( 15-11)
( 5) (3.75) ( 15-11)
.( 15-11) (3.44)
10-6)
-6) ( 5) (
(3.44) ( 5) (3.64) ( 10
.( 10-6)

(31)

21 20-16 15-11 10-6 5

*0.43 *0.31 *0.30 *0.20 - 3.44 5

*0.23 - - - - 3.64 10-6
- - - - - 3.74 15-11
- - - - - 3.75 20-16
- - - - - 3.87 21
(α=0.05) *

83
 :
." "
(27)
( )
(α =0.000) (F=18.45)
(α =0.05)
. .

(32)

( ) ( )
) (3.95)( )
. (3.48) (

( ) ( )
(3.59) ( ) (3.95)( )
.
( )
(3.85)( ) ( )
(3.48) ( )
.
( ) ( )
) (3.85)( )
. (3.59) (

84
 (32)

*0.47 *0.37 - - 3.48

*0.36 *0.26 - - 3.59
- - - - 3.85
- - - - 3.95
(α=0.05) *

:
:" "
(33)

(t) ( )
(α =0.000) (t=9.51)
(α =0.05)

(33)
(3.85)
.(3.40)

85
 (33)
(t)
.
(t)

0.000 *9.51 0.44 3.86

0.57 3.40
( α=0.05) *

:
:

(34)

(t) ( )
(α =0.000) (t=12.44)
(α =0.05)

.(3.40) (3.84)

86
 (34)
(t)
.
(t)

0.000 *12.44 0.45 3.84

0.51 3.17
( α=0.05) *

:
)
.(
(35)

(F)

0.000 *8.69 2.610 7.830 (378 3)

0.300 173.660

0.000 *24.88 7.182 14.363 (579 2)

0.289 167.127

0.000 *21.08 5.967 17.900 (378 3)

0.283 163.590

0.000 *7.84 2.339 9.355 (377 4)

0.298 172.135

0.000 *16.92 4.883 14.648 (378 3)

0.289 166.842

( α=0.05) *

:" " :

(35)
( )
(α=0.000) (F=8.69)
. (α =0.05)

87
 .

(36)
( 30)
( 30) ( 51)
(3.80) ( 51) (3.44)
.( 51)
( 30) ( 50-41)
30) (3.78) ( 50-41)
.( 50-41) (3.64) (

(36)

51
50- 41 40- 31 30

*0.36 *0.34 - - 3.44 30

- - - - 3.64 40- 31
- - - - 3.78 50- 41
- - - - 3.80 51
(α=0.05) *

:
:" "

(35)
( )
(F=24.88)
(α =0.05) (α=0.000)

88
 .

(37)
( )
( )
(3.79)( )
(3.32) ( )
.( )
) ( )
(3.32)( ) (
(3.66) ( )
.( )

(37)

- *0.34 *0.47 3.79

- - - 3.66
- - - 3.32

(α=0.05) *

89
 :
:" "

(35)
( )
(F=21.08)
(α =0.05) (α=0.000)
.

(38)
( )
( )
(3.44) ( )
(3.87) ( )
.( )

( ) ( )
(3.56) ( )
(3.87) ( )
.( )
( )
( ) ( )
(3.77) ( ) (3.44)
.( )

90
 ( )
( )
(3.56) ( )
.( ) (3.77) ( )

(38)

- - - - 3.87
- - - - 3.77
- - *0.21 *0.31 3.56
- - *0.33 *0.43 3.44

(α=0.05) *

:
:" "

(35)
( )
(α=0.000) (F=16.91)
(α =0.05)
.

(39)
21)
21) ( 5) (

91
 (3.44) ( 5) (3.87) (
.( 21)
( 21)
(3.87) ( 21) ( 10-6)
(3.58) ( 10-6)
.( 21)
( 5) ( 20-16)
5) (3.77) ( 20-16)
.( 20-16) (3.44) (

( 5) ( 15-11)
(3.44) ( 5) (3.69) ( 15-11)
.( 15-11)

(39)

21 20-16 15-11 10-6 5

*0.43 *0.33 *0.25 - - 3.44 5

*0.29 - - - - 3.58 10-6
- - - - - 3.69 15-11
- - - - - 3.77 20-16
- - - - - 3.87 21
(α=0.05) *

:
:" "

(35)
( )

92
 (α =0.000) (F=16.92)
(α =0.05)
.

(40)

( ) ( )
) (3.81)( )
. (3.39) (

( ) ( )
( ) (3.69)( )
. (3.39)
( )
) ( )
(3.60) ( ) (3.39) (
.
(40)

*0.42 *0.30 *0.21 - 3.39

- - - - 3.60
- - - - 3.69
- - - - 3.81
(α=0.05) *

93
 :
:" "

(41)

(t) ( )
(α =0.000) (t=6.09)
(α =0.05)

.(3.46) (3.79)

(41)
(t)
.
(t)

0.000 *6.09 0.48 3.79

0.65 3.46
( α=0.05) *

:
:" "

(42)

94
 (t)
(α =0.000) (t=6.38)
(α =0.05)

.(3.34) (3.77)

(42)
(t)
.
(t)

0.000 *6.38 0.50 3.77

0.65 3.34
( α=0.05) •

95
 1 .5

:
.1
)

.(

.
.

.
.

96
 .
.

.
(2005 )

(2004 )

(1999)

.
(1991)
.
(2000)
.
.2

)
(
)
. (
.3

)
(
)

97
 (
.
.4

) (
(
.
.5

)
(
( )
.
.6

)
(
)
(
.
.7

)
) (

98
 (
.
.8

)
(
)
. (
.10

.
.11

.
..
.12

99
 .

.
.13

.
.14

.
.15

.
.16

.17

100
 )
.(
.

.
.

.
.

.18
)
.(
.( 50-41) ( 51)
) ( )
(
.( ) ( )
21) ( 20-16) ( 15-11)
.(
.

.(3.46) (3.79)

101
 (3.77)
.(3.34)

: 2 .5
:
.1

.
.2

.
.3

102
 .4

.
.5
.
.6

: 3 .5

.
(582)

. (49)

.(0.9258) ( )

(3.6)
) (%41.9) (3.7)
(%22.3) .(

103
 (%30.2) (%19.4)
(%39.3) (%32.7)
.( ) (%27.5)

)
.(
)
.(

104
 :

: .
" (2005)
"
.708-639 (4) (45)
: . (2002)

.
" " ( 2006)
. 505-543 . (3) (46)
" (1990)

. 61 (70) (30) "

" ,(2002), ,
,"
.2 ,42 ,
" (2006)

.2 3 "
" (2006)
"
.
. (1998)
.

105
 " (1991)
"
. 173 – 128 :2
(1997)
.15 (56)
" (1998)
"

.
. 1 (2000)
" (1999)
"
.
(1997)
.
. . ( 2000)
(2002)
.
" (2003)
(1) (30) "
.
".(2002) , ,
" :
:
.200-165 (2) (17)

106
 " (2004)

"
.99-61 1 15
(2005)
1
.
.(2002) .(Dale M, Lles, B)
. : ( )
(2001)

.
" (2004)
"
.70-1
. 1 " " (2004)
: .(2002) .
. :
(2002)
.
(1995)
.
" (2003)
"
.

107
 : ( ) .(1990) .
.
(2003)
. :
" (1994)
"
–277 (3) (10)
. 308
: (2005)
.
.( 2002)
.
: (2003)
.1
( ) ( 1995)
.
1 . (2003)
.
2 . (2004)
.
" (1999)
"

.95-1

108
 2 ( 2000 )
.
: (1995)
. .
1 ( 1993 )
.
. (2004)
. 3
: . .(1989) .
.
" (2001)
" :
.682-641 4 40
" (1999)
"
. 275 – 259 . (2) (6)
" (2000)

(3) 40 "
. 609 – 575

: .
Bavon, Aloysuis (1996). “Innovations in Performance Measurement
System: A Comparative Perspective”. International Journal of
Public Administration, Vol.(18) No(2&3).
Bradley E Wright(2003) “Toward Understanding Task, Mission and
Public Service Motivation: A Conceptual and Empirical Synthesis
of Goal Theory and Public Service Motivation”, Paper prepared for

109
 presentation at the 7th National Public Management Research
Conference, Georgetown Public Policy Institute, Georgetown
University, Washington, D.C., October 9-11, 2003.
Cherrington, David J,(1994), “Organization Behavior”, second edition,
Allyan and Bacon,USA.
Corpanzano R and Folger , R, . (1991). “Procedural Justice and worker
Motivation in H.R.M” . strers and L . W . Porter ( Eds). Motivation
and work behavior, 5th ed New york : Metro Hill.
Egan , Terri , (1994) , “Multiple Dimension of Organizational Justice
perceptions and Individual Level Performance”, Dissertation
Abstract International , vol (54) , (8), P. 1150 .
Fenton-LeShore, Karen S. (2004) “A correlation analysis among
organizational citizenship behavior, teacher job satisfaction, and
organizational commitment in low-performing New York City
public high schools”, A Ph. D. dissertation, Regent Univesity, U.S.A.
Fok, Lillian, Y. (2000) “ The relationship Between Equity Sensitivity,
Growth Need, strength, Organizational citizenship Behavior, and
perceived outcomes in the Quality Environment: A study of
Accounting professionals”, Journal of social Behavior, personality,
vol. (15), 99-121.
Foote David A; Seipel Scott J; Johnson Nancy B; Duffy Michelle K (2005)
“Employee commitment and organizational policies”, Management
Decision, February 2005, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 203-219.
Luthans , Fred, (1995), “Organizational Behaviour”, New York Mc
Graw- Hill, Inc,7 ed.
Gabbert, Jeffrey Allan (2005) “The relationship between organizational
values and management behaviors and their influence on
organizational performance in an Army project management
organization”, Ph. D. dissertation, ARGOSY UNIVERSITY
/SARASOTA, ISBN 0-496-93355-8.
Greenberg, Jerald & Baron, Robert A, (1997), “Behavior In
Organizations”, Sixth edition, Prentice-Hall, USA.
Greenberg, Jerald. (1986) “Determinates of Perceived Fairness of
performances Evaluation”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 71 (2):,
pp340 – 442.
Grote, D. (2002). “The performance appraisal”, NewYork, NY:
AMACOM.
Kennedy, Jeffrey. C (1995). “Empowering Employees through the
Performance Appraisal”. Harvard Business Review Vol. (41) No (6).

110
Kleemann, Frank & Matuschek , Ingo(2002) : “Between Job and
Satisfaction: Motivations and Career Orientations of German "High
Quality" Call Center Employees”, Chemnitz University of Technology
Germany, Electronic Journal of Sociology, Vol. 6, No 2, ISSN:
1198 3655,p p 1-33.
Lee , H.R. (2000) “ “An Empirical study of organizational Justice as a
Mediator of the relationships among Leader-Member Exchange
and Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and Turnover
intentions in the lodging industry”, ph.D-Dissertation, Virginia state
university .
Luthans, Fred,(1992) “Organizational Behavior”, 6th Edition, McGraw-
Hill, Inc., N.Y.
Marchiori, R. & Henkin, A.(2004) “Organizational commitment of a health
profession faculty: dimensions, correlates and conditions”. Medical
Teacher, 26(4), 353-358.
Michel Carins(2004), “Sales what Motivation”, Sales and Marketing
Management, Vol 156, Issue 10.
Moorman, Gregory, and Griffin, Ricky, w. (1989) “Organizational
Behavior”, 2nd (Ed), Boston, Houghton Mifflin Company.
Organ. Dennisw,& Bateman, Thomas S, (1991),”Organizational
Behavior”, Richarad,D. Publisher, USA.
Rahim, M, Afzalur (2000) “Do Justice perceptions influence styles of
Handling conflict with supervisors? What Justice perceptions,
precisely?” International Journal of conflict Management, vol.
(11), 9-23.
Robbins Stephen(2001), “Organizational Behaviour”, New jersey,
Prentice Hall.
Robbins, Stephen& Mary Culter,(1999), “Management”, 6th ed., Upper
Saddle River: New jersey, Prentice Hall.
Robbins, Stephen.(1997), “Organizational Behaviour” New jersey ,8th ed
Prentice Hall.
Scholl, R. (2002). “Affective Motivation and Emotional Intelligence,
University of Rhode Island”. Avialable at:
www.uri.edu/research/lrc/Papers.
Shan-Kou Chiu, (2005) “The linkage of job performance to goal setting,
work motivation, team building, and organizational commitment in the
high-tech industry in Taiwan (China)” Journal of Management
Development, Volume: 22 Issue: 5 Page: 426 - 442

111
Steers &other’s,(2002), “The Future of Work; Motivation Theory”,
Academy of Management Review, Vol 29, Issue 3.
Steers. R, M (1977) “Antecedent and Out Comes of Organizational
Commitment”. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol .22, pp 46-56
.
Szilagyi, A. D. , & Wallace Jr. , M. J. (1990). “Organizational behavior
and performance” (5th Ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
Tapinos, E; Dyson, R.G.; Meadows, M (2005) “The impact of performance
measurement in strategic planning” , International Journal of
Productivity and Performance Management, Vol 54, No 5-6
Taylor, M. Susan, Kay B. Tracy, Monika K. Renard, J . Kline Harrison and
Stephen J. Caroll (1995). “Due Process in Performance Appraisal: A
Quasi Experiment in Procedural Justice”. Administrative Science
Quarterly, Vol. (40) No. (3).
Thomas,G, (1993), “Organization Development and Change”,5ed, New
York, West Publishing Company.
Ubom Israel Udo & Joshua Monday T. (2004) “Needs satisfaction
variables as predictors of job performance of employees Implications
for Guidance and Counselling, The African Symposium An On-line
African” Educational Research Journal A Publication of the
African Educational Research Network (AERN), Vol. 4. No.3.
Welsch, H.P., & LaVan, H (1981). “Inter-relationships between
organizational commitment and job characteristics, job satisfaction,
professional behavior, and organizational climate”. Human
Relations, 34, 1079-1089.
William,B. J. (1996). “Performance Measurement: Evaluations and
Incentives”, Boston: Harvard Business.
Zahra, S.Z. (1993). “A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm
behaviour: Acritique and extension. Entrepreneurship” Theory and
Practice, 17(4), 5-21.

112
( )

( )

113
114