Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Matt Clark
Gonzaga
Organizational Ethics
COML 503
The landscape of modern journalism has changed over the last few decades. Long rooted
in traditional research and investigative methodologies, the art of journalism has been
transformed to a “get it first” over the “get it right” mentality. Today, there exists three kinds of
newspapers. There are those good, intelligent, honest newspapers, morally pernicious and
(Yarros, 1922, p. 410). It has become common for newspapers — large and small — to commit
daily sins innumerable because of the desire to shield injustice and wrong-doing and to prevent
well-intentioned and reasonable people from learning the truth regarding iniquities of social
order (Yarros, 1922, p. 410). Competition, short staffing and pressures from sources can be the
root to any newspaper evil. In this paper, I will examine common ethical issues within the
newspaper world and look at the steps I take, as a manager, to solve these dilemmas.
Ethical issues in newspapers are more common than the average person may realize.
Studies show most newspaper reporters are not aware of the exact scope of newspaper ethics
despite the fact many journalism organizations publish a code of ethics meant to be a guide for
writers, photographers and editors to follow. In fact, only a quarter of editors of daily newspapers
reported having an ethics standard posted for their journalists to examine (Anderson, 1987, p.
343). Of that, only 30 percent of editors at smaller publications reported distributing codes of
ethics to their staff (Anderson, 1987, p. 343). While there is not one particular ethical dilemma
that infiltrates the newsroom I supervise, one of the most common is the offering of gifts to
reporters for favorable treatment in stories. This can range from favors given by sources to free
THE ETHICAL DILEMMAS OF THE MODERN NEWSPAPER 3
access to games, venues or events for reporters in the hopes of gaining favor. Some of the issues
I have either seen or been a party of include being given tickets to a movie premier by a county
official with the hopes of withholding a potentially damaging story about his political campaign
contributor list. Another includes an entire newsroom being given gifts during the Christmas
season by a local charity with the intent of favorable coverage and placement of their annual
One of the most prevailing issues newsrooms face regards the line between advertising
and editorial. This line becomes blurred when advertising staff requests editorial content, either
when the newsroom learns of facts surrounding a scandal with a large newspaper advertiser. At
times, the newsroom can be pressured into withholding the story or changing the scope of the
story so the advertiser is not likely to pull their advertising dollars from the newspaper. Other
ethical issues present themselves on a regular basis such as the temptation to write stories with
the hopes of winning awards rather than presenting the facts in an accurate fashion; or misuse the
position of a journalist to further their personal interests or desires (Anderson, 1987, p. 345).
These have come to light in newsrooms I have worked at when a reporter has a certain political
affiliation and chooses to advance the cause of their party by writing somewhat slanted articles
Every situation in a newsroom can present varying ethical challenges and questions. It is
true there are different ethical guidelines written as outlines to practices in newsrooms but those
THE ETHICAL DILEMMAS OF THE MODERN NEWSPAPER 4
don’t cover every situation and don’t take into account the differences in newsroom staffs from a
I have spent most of my career at smaller daily newspapers that present their own sets of
or advertisers while trying to maintain traditional journalistic integrity (Anderson, 1987, p. 345).
But, at the end of the day, our ethical decisions are rooted more in our personal beliefs and
experiences while newspaper ethics guides are used as a point of reference. Some editors use the
theory of egoism to base their ethical decisions on. This is the theory that actions are right if it
promotes the best interests of the individual (Shaw & Barry, 2007, p. 53). The problem with
basic journalistic ethical decisions on an egoism theory is that the self-interest that guides the
theory can often be the root of the ethical problem. A lot of smaller newspaper editors base
ethical decisions on the act utilitarianism theory which suggests the only moral obligation is that
I have found the most accurate depiction of ethical principle to use is that of the rule-
utilitarianism theory that prescribes the utilitarianism standard is applied to both individual
actions as well as moral codes (Shaw & Barry, 2007, p. 71). Richard Brand suggested rule
utilitarianism theorists believe correct actions are permitted by a moral code the journalism
society (Shaw & Barry, 2007, p. 71). In most ethical situations we have to balance the good of
the public for which we serve with the code of ethics we have learned and attempt to adhere to
on a daily basis.
making the ethical decision. Some editors are more diplomats in a sense they attempt to smooth
over controversy and avoid conflict by stifling new and creative approaches to presenting news
THE ETHICAL DILEMMAS OF THE MODERN NEWSPAPER 5
(Lichtenstein, Smith, & Torbert, 1995, p. 103). However, I along with other newsroom managers
attempt to be more of the achiever manager where our goal is to implement the organization’s
existing strategy and our success is measured by the success of the organization (Lichtenstein et
al., 1995, p. 105). To drill down further, we look past the strategy of the ownership organization
and gear more towards the goal of the individual newspaper. The achiever manager with that
mentality has to be of the belief that the best interest lies with the readers of the paper and not
While there are codes of conduct and ethics for journalists that are widely published and
available to newsroom staff, as stated every situation presents a different set of challenges
regarding ethical situations. The differences between small-town editors and major metropolitan
editors are vast and the methods used to solve ethical dilemmas are different. Small-town
newspapers struggle with the delicate balance of exhibiting pride in the community while not
shying away from controversy (Anderson, 1987, p. 345). But, when it comes to those
controversial issues, editors have to ride a fine line between what is best for the source of the
controversy and what is best for the readers. It injects a element of humanity into the moral and
ethical decision-making process while maintaining principle and a sense of duty (Shaw & Barry,
2007, p. 75). Each case of ethical question has to be examined by both reporter and editor with
care and caution. Every case is different and there are no set guidelines that govern every
scenario. Newspapers, above all, should be accurate, fair, exact and sane. The reading public is
entitled to newspapers that are good and honorable (Yarros, 1922, p. 419). Within the ethical
decisions of an editor — either small or large market — is common sense. The questions of: It is
THE ETHICAL DILEMMAS OF THE MODERN NEWSPAPER 6
right? Why are we doing it? Does it serve the public? Are we informing the public accurately
and fairly? Those are questions that have to be asked of any story with a journalistic ethical
question attached. The interest of the public and of fairness have to be paramount to any story a
References
Anderson, D. (1987). How Managing Editors View and Deal With Ethical Issues. Journalism
Lichtenstein, B. M., Smith, B. A., & Torbert, W. R. (1995). Leadership and Ethical
Development: Balancing Light and Shadow. Business Ethics Quarterly, 5(1), 97-116.
Shaw, W. H., & Barry, V. (2007). Moral Issues in Business (10th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson
Wadsworth.
Yarros, V. S. (1922, July). Journalism, Ethics, and Common Sense. International Journal of