Professional Documents
Culture Documents
169
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY
of potentials that has an awareness and response of its own parallel with the
conscious mind. The Unconscious differs from the Conscious Mind in being literal
and childlike. This dual view of personality is often an explicit or implicit basis of
hypnotherapy, whether one is an Ericksonian or not. Parts two and three,
psychotherapy and hypnotherapy, actually overlap in concept, with an emphasis
on the individualization of therapy. Concerning hypnosis, Erickson believed that
"Any normal person and some abnormal persons can be hypnotized provided
there is adequate motivation" (p. 206). It seems, however, that extreme patience,
time, and energy may be needed to hypnotize some individuals. Further, "[T]he
hypnotist-subject relationship is entirely one of voluntary cooperation, and no
subject can be hypnotized against his will or without his cooperation" (p. 210).
One wonders how Erickson was able to create this type of cooperation in the
Spanish-speaking nurse whom he hypnotized by pantomime alone. The use of
confusion and boredom as facilitating techniques in inducing hypnosis is intrigu-
ing, but this book does not provide actual illustrations of these techniques. More
systematic and comprehensive views of Erickson's ideas and techniques are found
in E. Rossi's The Collected Papers of Milton H. Erickson on Hypnosis and in
Erickson and Rossi's Hypnotic Realities, Experiencing Hypnosis, and Hypnother
apy: An Exploratory Casebook. Many of Erickson's ideas and techniques, while
controversial in some areas, have been integrated with today's psychotherapeutic
and hypnotherapeutic endeavors. This book provides a basic introduction to these
ideas and techniques, with quotations from the master. I enjoyed reading the
introductory comments for each chapter, but found the quotes boring. Followers
of Erickson, on the other hand, might find the master's own words dealing with
various subjects handy.
Fresno, CA HOYLE LEIGH, M.D.