Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Open Innovation
sourcing ideas, concepts, and solutions from a broad diversity of people and organizations
(Docherty, 2006). In contrast to the corporate silo mentality and the secrecy typically associated
with the corporate R&D culture, open innovation challenges represent a true cultural shift. When
a corporation recognizes that there are many bright people and more expertise outside the
organization, an innovation model becomes viable. Currently, there is a greater chance than ever
ecosystems.
According to Tidd & Bessant (2016), the following are three of Chesbrough’s six
External ideas can help create value, but it takes internal R&D to claim a portion of
internal R&D activities and external knowledge sourcing. Strong internal R&D capacities
increase the impact of sourcing from value chain partners and horizontal links. This suggests that
various external knowledge partners and internal R&D capabilities (Cheng, Vanhaverbeke, &
Du, 2016).
2
For example, Procter & Gamble launched a new line of Pringles potato crisps in 2004
with pictures and words—trivia questions, animal facts, jokes—printed on each crisp. They were
an immediate hit. By applying a fundamentally new approach to innovation, they were able to
accelerate Pringles Prints from concept to launch in less than a year and at a fraction of what it
would have otherwise cost. Someone suggested that we print pop culture images on Pringles, and
one of their researchers thought they should try ink-jetting pictures onto the potato dough. It was
a great idea, but no one knew how to do it. Traditionally, they would have spent the bulk of their
Instead, they created a technology brief that defined the problems we needed to solve,
and they circulated it throughout our global networks of individuals and institutions to discover if
anyone in the world had a ready-made solution. It was through their European network that they
discovered a small bakery in Bologna, Italy, run by a university professor who also manufactured
baking equipment. He had invented an ink-jet method for printing edible images on cakes and
cookies that they rapidly adapted to solve their problem. This innovation has helped the North
America Pringles business achieve double-digit growth over the past two years.
This is an example of how internal R&D made it possible for Procter and Gamble to
It is better to build a better business model than to get to the market first.
operate, create and market its brand, manufacture and distribute its goods, and expand or draw in
a market (compete). Choosing a suitable business model is essential to a company's success. New
technology is transformed into economic value through business models. Some start-ups may not
always be able to use well-known business models; hence a new model needs to be developed. In
3
most cases, the innovation of the product or service itself is significantly less important than the
For example, while other PC makers focused on computers for the home market, Dell
consciously chose to go after large corporate accounts, which were far more profitable. Other PC
makers offered low-end machines to lure in first-time buyers. Michael Dell was not interested in
this “no-margin” business. He staked out his territory selling more powerful, higher-margin
computers.
Then, because Dell sold direct and could analyze its customers in-depth, it began to
notice that its average selling price to consumers was increasing while the industry was falling.
Consumers who were buying their second or third machines and looking for more power and less
hand-holding were coming to Dell even though it was not targeting them. After it had a
profitable, billion-dollar consumer business, Dell dedicated a group to serving the consumer
segment.
With a decade-long lead, Dell is by far the industry’s best executor of the direct-selling
model. It is a low-cost producer. So it uses its cost advantage in PCs to compete on price, gain
share, and drive the weaker players out of business. At the same time, the company is relying on
its core business model to pursue opportunities in new product markets, like servers, that have
greater profit potential than PCs. The underlying business model remains the same.
If you make the best use of internal and external ideas, you will win.
Open innovation has been shown to favorably impact a company's innovative output by
offering three important advantages: information sharing, risk reduction, and rapid development.
Each partner may be able to learn more from the project through collaboration than they might
Utilizing both internal and external ideas yields success since it is one method of
lowering product development costs and lowering the likelihood of failure. Additionally, the
Samsung and Apple would be two examples of this. Samsung, a competitor in Texas,
develops the CPU that drives Apple's iPad 2 and iPhone 4S. It is called the A5 chip. Businesses
need to ensure that they are quickly and effectively utilizing internal and external knowledge
while also innovating to produce new goods or services. Furthermore, we can see from the Apple
and Samsung examples above that using both will benefit a business and reduce operating
expenses.
Conclusion
Open innovation is essential for businesses because it allows them to use both internal
and external ideas and paths to market as they look to advance their technology while pursuing
lower costs for innovation, quicker times to market, and the opportunity to share risks with
others. As ideas and technologies become obsolete at a very fast rate and much useful knowledge
has been widely disseminated, open innovation is essential for businesses (Chesbrough, 2006).
Organizations need to embrace an "open innovation" business model if they want to succeed in
References
Chen, Y., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Du, J. (2016). The interaction between internal R & D and
Chesbrough, H. (2012). Open innovation: Where we have been and where we are
Kopp, C. M. (2022. August 1). What is a business model with types and examples? Investopedia.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/businessmodel.asp
13–17.
Lassen, A. H., & Laugen, B. T. (2017). Open innovation: on the influence of internal and
Mowery, D. C. (1983). Innovation, market structure, and government policy in the American
Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. R. (2016). Managing innovation: integrating technological, market and