Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BUS450 Methodology
BUS450 Methodology
This chapter indicates what approach and techniques were used in the study to analyze the data.
This chapter includes five distinct sub-sections – research approach, sampling method, variable
measurement, data collection strategy and statistic model(s)
3.1 Research approach
Quantitative and qualitative are the most common research methodologies (Bryman,
2006; Teddlie & Tashakkori, 2009). Quantitative research can be utilized to test the research
hypotheses and evaluate the influence of the independent variables on the dependent variable.
This paper will apply quantitative research to find out the impacts of five independent variables,
which are (1) work environment, (2) pay and benefits, (3) management systems, (4) result
feedback and motivation, and (5) respect on the job satisfaction of university teachers in Thu
Dau Mot city.
The primary data were collected by directly delivering questionnaires to university
teachers in Thu Dau Mot city, Binh Duong province. The information will be collected through
web pages such as Google Forms for its benefits, such as low cost and time-consuming.
3.2 Sampling method
The data were collected from teachers working at universities in Thu Dau Mot city, Binh
Duong province, by delivering questionnaires. The sampling methods used for this study are
convenience and snowball sampling. Convenience sampling is a type of nonprobability or
nonrandom sampling where members of the target population that meet certain practical criteria
with an easily accessible, available and cost-effective sample (Etikan, 2016). Snowball sampling
is a non - probability form of survey sample selection, also known as chain referral sampling,
and is often used to discover unusual or difficult-to-find populations (Johnson, 2014).
According to Hair, Black, Babin and Anderson (2009), the formula to calculate the
sample size as below:
n= 5*m
Where:
n is the sample size
m is the number of variables items
This paper utilizes 31 items. Therefore, according to the formula above, the sample size
should be:
n = 5 * 31 = 155
As the calculation above, this study's questionnaire contains at least 155 responses. Those
respondents must be representative samples of the population of university teachers working in
Thu Dau Mot city, Binh Duong province.
3.3 Variable measurement
This study is divided into 2 sections:
(1) Factors affect job satisfaction on university teachers
This data was collected through a survey based on the questionnaire. In addition, the
research will apply a 5-point Likert rating scale to measure five independent variables, including
(1) working environment, (2) pay and benefits, (3) management systems, (4) result feedback and
motivation, (5) respect and one dependent variable which is job satisfaction. A 5-point Likert
rating scales uses score from 1 to 5 to represent 1=Absolutely disagree, 2=Disagree, 3=Neutral,
4=Agree, 5=Absolutely agree, respectively, and is utilized to collect primary data sufficiently
and effectively to process it easily.
Independent variables and its measurement items
Variables Code Items Citations
My university provides abundant library
WE1
facilities
My university provides completed teaching
WE2
instruments
Work
My office or my area of work is comfortable (Chen et al., 2006)
environment WE3
and safe
WE4 My university provides convenient parking
My university provides hygienic dining
WE5
environments
Pay and My university provides good salaries (Chen et al., 2006)
PB1
Benefits systems
My university provides working security
PB2
systems
PB3 My university provides good retirement
systems
My university provides lodging, travel
PB4
related welfare allowances
My university provides subsidies for further
PB5
education
My university provides fair promotion
MS1
systems
My university provides good management
MS2
systems
My university provides high-quality service
MS3
Management processes
(Chen et al., 2006)
systems Directors with leadership and managerial
MS4
capacity
My university introduces innovation
MS5
management systems
My university has a clear system of rewards
MS6
and penalties
My university recognizes achievements of
RFM1
teaching and research of teachers
RFM2 My university provides achievement rewards
Result My university has rewards and glorification
RFM3
feedback and for outstanding performances (Chen et al., 2006)
motivation My university supports for the results of
RFM4
teaching and research
My university allows teachers to know
RFM5
school’s operating conditions
Respect Professional knowledge is respected by (Chen et al., 2006)
RE1
superiors
RE2 Mutual respect among teachers
RE3 Respect for their teachers by students
RE4 Students’ outstanding performances in class
RE5 My department respect other departments
My department is respected by others
RE6
departments
Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative
Research, 6(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058877
Chen, S.-H., Yang, C.-C., Shiau, J.-Y., & Wang, H.-H. (2006). The development of an employee
satisfaction model for higher education. The TQM Magazine, 18, 484–500.
https://doi.org/10.1108/09544780610685467
Fisher, M. J., & Marshall, A. P. (2009). Understanding descriptive statistics. Australian Critical
Care, 22(2), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2008.11.003
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.).
Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall
Moore, A. W., Anderson, B., Das, K., & Wong, W. K. (2006). Combining multiple signals for
biosurveillance. Handbook of Biosurveillance, 235-242. doi: 10.1016/B978-012369378-
5/50017- X
Ong, C. H., Shi, C. H., Kowang, T. O., Fei, G. C., & Ping, L. L. (2020). Factors influencing job
satisfaction among academic staffs. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in
Education (IJERE), 9(2), 285. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i2.20509
Taherdoost, H., Sahibuddin, S., & Jalaliyoon, N. (2014). Exploratory Factor Analysis; Concepts
and Theory. In J. Balicki (Ed.), Advances in Applied and Pure Mathematics (Vol. 27, pp.
375–382). WSEAS. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02557344
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating
Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. SAGE.
Yurdakul, M., & Tansel İÇ, Y. (2009). Application of correlation test to criteria selection for
multi criteria decision making (MCDM) models. The International Journal of Advanced
Manufacturing Technology, 40(3–4), 403–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-007-1324-
1