You are on page 1of 3

Piaget's Child Development

AP Psychology

Assignment Part 1
Find 2 Examples of age/developmentally appropriate toys for each of Piaget’s stages. Explain
what makes each toy a good selection of a child in that age range or developmental stage.

Stage Example #1 with Explanation Example #2 with Explanation

Sensorimotor Stage A plush toy with different A stackable toy with rings of
textures, shapes, and colors: different sizes: This toy would
This toy would be appropriate be appropriate for an infant in
for an infant in the sensory- the sensory-motor stage
motor stage because it because it allows them to
provides a variety of sensory practice grasping and
experiences for them to manipulating objects with
explore and learn from. their hands.

Preoperational Stage A shape-sorter toy: This toy A toy kitchen set: This toy
would be appropriate for a would be appropriate for a
child in the preoperational child in the preoperational
stage because it requires stage because it allows them
them to use their symbolic to act out different scenarios
thinking skills to match the and roles, which can help
shapes to the corresponding them to develop their social
openings in the toy. skills and understanding of
the world around them.

Concrete Operational Stage A simple board game that A LEGO set: This toy would be
requires problem-solving: This appropriate for a child in the
toy would be appropriate for a concrete operational stage
child in the concrete because it can help the child
operational stage because it to develop their spatial skills
requires them to use their and their understanding of
logical thinking skills and the properties of different
consider different possibilities materials.
in order to win.

Formal Operational Stage A science experiment set: This A chess set: This toy would be
toy would be appropriate for a appropriate for a child in the
child in the formal operational formal operational stage
stage because it allows them because it requires them to
to engage in scientific inquiry think abstractly and calculate
and problem-solving. moves ahead. This can help
the child to develop their
strategic thinking skills and
their understanding of the
principles of cause and effect.

Page 1 of 3
© Copyright Fueled by Launch
Assignment Part 2
Vygotsky’s Theory - Write 1 paragraph explaining his theory and comparing it to Paiget’s.
Vygotsky's development theory is a cognitive-developmental theory that emphasizes the role of
social interactions and cultural experiences in the development of higher mental functions.
According to Vygotsky, children learn and develop through interactions with their environment
and with more knowledgeable others, such as parents, teachers, and peers. These interactions
allow children to internalize new knowledge and skills, which then become part of their mental
structures and processes Both Vygotsky's and Piaget's theories recognize the importance of
social and cultural experiences in development, but they differ in their emphasis on the role of
individual experience and the mechanisms by which new knowledge and skills are internalized.

Outline an experiment you think could test a child's executive functioning. Be sure to use
psychology’s scientific method format discussed in the first unit and keep ethics in mind.
State the research question: How does the type of feedback provided to a child during a task
influence their executive functioning abilities?

Formulate a hypothesis: If a child receives positive feedback during a task, they will
demonstrate better executive functioning abilities compared to if they receive negative
feedback or no feedback.

Design the study:

Participants: A group of children between the ages of 6 and 8, who are randomly assigned to
one of three conditions: positive feedback, negative feedback, or no feedback.
Procedure: The children will complete a series of tasks designed to measure their executive
functioning abilities. In the positive feedback condition, the children will receive verbal praise
and encouragement for their performance. In the negative feedback condition, the children will
receive criticism and corrections for their performance. In the no feedback condition, the
children will not receive any feedback about their performance.
Measures: The children's performance on the tasks will be scored and recorded by trained
research assistants.
Controls: To control for extraneous variables, the tasks will be presented in a standardized
manner to all of the children, and the research assistants will be blind to the condition to which
each child has been assigned.
Collect and analyze the data: The data collected from the children's performance on the tasks
will be analyzed using statistical tests to determine whether there are significant differences
between the three conditions.

Draw conclusions: If the results of the statistical tests show that the children in the positive
feedback condition demonstrated better executive functioning abilities compared to the
children in the negative feedback or no feedback conditions, this would support the hypothesis
that positive feedback can improve executive functioning in children.

Page 2 of 3
© Copyright Fueled by Launch
Page 3 of 3
© Copyright Fueled by Launch

You might also like