Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PROCEDURE Page: 1 of 24
CONTENTS
SECTION DESCRIPTION
1.0 PURPOSE
2.0 SCOPE
5.0 METHOD
10.0 ATTACHMENTS/APPENDICES
1. PURPOSE:
Classification: Internal Use
PROCEDURE Page: 2 of 24
The purpose of this management system is to provide the minimum requirements for effectively
managing changes to a facility over its lifetime from design, construction, operation,
decommissioning, mothballing and demolition. The MOC standard helps ensure that any changes do
not inadvertently introduce new hazards or unknowingly increase the risk of prospected hazards.
The airport environment is constantly evolving in response to the changing requirements of the
aviation business and the process of continual improvement. It is critical that such changes must be
considered in alignment with DACO safety policy and objectives.
It is crucial then to consult the concerned group of staff to assess whether the new circumstances
impact upon the safety of the workplace before these changes can be introduced into the airport
environment. Thereafter, such changes must be communicated in a clear and unambiguous manner
within a suitable period of time for the change to be discussed and assimilated.
MOC is about identifying potential hazards that a change can introduce, then assessing the risks
associated with these hazards, and systematically addressing them.
Any change to airport, process or people could introduce risk. In addition, changes can have
unintended or unsuspected consequences. A review of incidents across industry indicates that
ineffective MOC processes can result in:
Change management that focuses on the expected benefits without properly considering the
possible risks;
A tendency to focus on technical change rather than all types of change e.g., organizational,
materials and legal and regulatory requirements;
Failure to communicate changes to the people affected by the change;
Failure to update or revise key documents such as operating procedures; and
Failure to address all relevant aspects of a change, which is a factor in many incidents and poor
business decisions.
Therefore, a formal process that is used to manage any change from conception through to
implementation is essential to identifying foreseeable potential hazards and managing their risks.
The MOC process is not a way to capture or explore ideas. Before initiating an MOC in the MOC
system, the following activities should be completed.
Discuss it with the right people, for example your line manager.
An indication from them that it’s feasible and that money and people are available to complete
the change.
Agreement from them that it should be progressed through MOC. This agreement is then
formally documented in the MOC system.
2. SCOPE:
Classification: Internal Use
PROCEDURE Page: 3 of 24
2.1. This management system applies to the functions when changes to existing approved
manufacturers/suppliers are made for DACO facilities.
2.2. The scope of this management system applies to permanent, temporary, emergency, software (IT)
changes and temporary repairs to any facility owned and/or operated and maintained by DACO.
MOC is not required for replacements in kind.
2.3. For managing other non-design changes, please refer to the following DACO management system:
Management of Personnel and Organization Change
Operating Procedures
Maintenance Procedures
Emergency response plan, procedure and change in location of emergency response
equipment
Glossary Definition
PROCEDURE Page: 4 of 24
Glossary Definition
The following positions are assigned to the following responsibility to ensure compliance to this
management system.
Responsibility Assignment Matrix, indicating the Responsible, Accountable, Consulted and Informed
(RACI) roles for high-level activities.
Management
Stakeholders
Engineering
Committee
Chairman
CEO PT
Middle
DACO
Safety
MOC
Activity Description
PROCEDURE Page: 5 of 24
Management
Stakeholders
Engineering
Committee
Chairman
CEO PT
Middle
DACO
Safety
MOC
Activity Description
Technical MOCs should only be initiated when the Initiator believes the change
specifications are final and ready for implementation. Table 1 describes the
Classification: Internal Use
PROCEDURE Page: 6 of 24
Technical MOC stages and the primary responsibilities of the roles within each
stage. These stages are conducted sequentially.
Initiate Initiator
PROCEDURE Page: 7 of 24
Controller (Stage 2)
Classification: Internal Use
PROCEDURE Page: 8 of 24
PROCEDURE Page: 9 of 24
Technical Evaluation of the changes with the qualified and experienced resources (Evaluation
Engineers, etc.) for meeting the intended objective, business goals and approve/disapproval of
technical study performed.
Provide resources from operations for project design review, EHSS reviews, procedure
development, training, PSSR, Turnover, commissioning, start-up and MOC Closure.
Review permanent, Temporary, Emergency and EHSS MOC status with emphasis on expiry
date as part of PMT weekly meeting
Review and give concurrence to cancel the MOC's if not required.
Authorized commissioning after completion of PSSR punch ‘A’ items.
PROCEDURE Page: 10 of 24
PROCEDURE Page: 11 of 24
MOC committee chairman shall be Sr. Manager from technical division, back up to be of Sr.
Manager Position.
MOC committee members shall be as per section 5.4.2.
Committee to review and approve changes considering EHSS, currently plant operation, design
and PSM.
Committee to ensure minimum requirements are met as per FM-VD01-349
Committee reviews and approves the design changes to ensure the elements of MOC are
effectively controlled.
Committee reviews and approves initiations based on technical justifications.
Committee approvals are also needed for carrying out high risk activities for the projects e.g.,
hot taps, changes to cathodic protections, major process tie-ins, and temporary repairs.
Review & ensure that all EHSS factors are considered in the implementation phase of MOC
Recommends HAZOP Or other EHSS Reviews and ensures comments are resolved.
Steward’s temporary, Emergency and EHSS MOC status.
5 METHOD:
5.1 RECOGNITION OF A CHANGE
Classification: Internal Use
PROCEDURE Page: 12 of 24
A system shall be in place to establish ‘what constitutes a change’ and ensure employees and
contractors are trained to differentiate between a ‘Replacement in Kind’ and a ‘Replacement
not in Kind’. Refer to examples in Attachment-7: Examples of “Replacement in Kind” and
“Replacement not in Kind”
Refer to FM-VD01-349
PROCEDURE Page: 13 of 24
Relevant discipline engineer shall be as per the scope of change determined by the MOC
coordinator as per below:
MOC Chairman shall ensure that minimum quorum is available to proceed with change
approval.
Classification: Internal Use
PROCEDURE Page: 14 of 24
MOC coordinator shall initiate the meeting invite & facilitate documentation & reporting.
PROCEDURE Page: 15 of 24
periodic meeting schedule of the MOC should be developed. The MOC Chairman
shall approve each change after review by the MOC committee.
5.6.16 MOC committee review actions and approval shall be documented. Review actions
shall be tracked to completion.
5.6.17 MOC committee chairman shall verify and confirm that the area owner shall not
start on safety and fire protection related work until HCIS approval for the final
design and equipment. The HCIS shall have the right to reject any non-compliant
equipment, system, or suppliers. In case any equipment, system, or supplier is
rejected by HCIS, the FO shall replace it with one that is approved or submit
additional details for justification of approval.
The MOC review and approval should be a 2-step process. The first step
identifies the impact of the change and what needs to be done to approve the
change e.g. conduct PHA according to HAZOP methodology, check load on pipe
racks etc. The second step ensures that all assessments are complete before final
MOC approval is given
Classification: Internal Use
PROCEDURE Page: 16 of 24
PROCEDURE Page: 17 of 24
PROCEDURE Page: 18 of 24
5.9.2 Permanent and temporary changes shall be implemented only after the MOC
committee members have reviewed and approved the change
5.9.3 Temporary repairs shall be implemented only after designated members have
reviewed and approved (as per FM-VD01-348) the repair and risk assessment
conducted
5.10 SAFER
5.10.1 An MOC shall not be implemented if risk is still at ‘Major Risk’ level after
mitigation action. Major risk items identified in MOC shall be mitigated to
‘Insignificant Risk’ level or ALARP (with approvals for the level of risk) before
implementing or commissioning such MOCs.
5.10.2 MOCs with ‘Significant’ or ‘Minor’ residual risk levels shall be implemented
only with formal approvals in accordance with SHEM-02.00.
5.10.3 MOC can be implemented if the residual risk is at ‘Insignificant Risk’ level.
PROCEDURE Page: 19 of 24
and state/regional regulations and requirements and all international standards and treaties,
as applicable.
Legal & compliance requirements shall include but are not limited to the following:
Other Requirements.
UNO and International Treaties as applicable and feasible.
SABIC OMS Standards
RC-14001
ISO 14001
OHSAS 18001
Community requirements as feasible.
Costumer and stakeholder requirements, as applicable.
Gulf Petrochemicals & Chemicals Association (GPCA)
Montreal Protocol
Kyoto Protocol
Chemical Weapons Convention
Basel Convention
The applicable legal and other compliance requirements shall be identified in the EHSS
Legal and Other Compliance Requirements Registry (PR-VD01-023-H).
If an instance of regulatory non-compliance is identified by any employee, the EHSS
Incident reporting procedure will be used to address the non-compliance.
EHSS Security & GR section shall keep, maintain & renew Industrial and commercial
licenses.
EHSS Environment team shall maintain Environment Permit to Operate (EPO) records
Element or sub element leader shall document, track and report performance improvement, of the
below KPIs including any associated corrective and preventive actions, and then communicate them to
Classification: Internal Use
PROCEDURE Page: 20 of 24
concern personnel as per the review rhythm. Problem Solving Tools & Techniques procedure (OMS-
522) shall be followed to analyze the performance of this procedure as followings;
Performance
Review Rhythm Performance Analysis
Measurement (KPI)
Yearly Audit Analysis and Analysis of
Audit Findings for 3 years referring to
Internal Audit OMS Quarterly or Yearly OMS - Documentation or Implementation
6.1.
Compliance % Management Review - Root Causes of Findings (People,
Materials, Machines Or equipment,
Environment, Documents)
Number of incidents (Class A, B and C)
with root cause caused by inadequate
MOC.
Number of MOCs not closed within 180
days of implementation
Number of changes carried out
a) 100 % Compliance to Quarterly or Yearly OMS without MOC.
6.2.
MOC Requirement Management Review
Number of temporary change
overdue MOCs with reference to
first date set.
Number of MOC Quality reviews
conducted by the Standard Leader
in a year
6.7. DACO shall establish a rhythm to review performance against this management system .The results of
these reviews shall be used as input to DACO’s continual improvement plans in accordance with
Continual Improvement Framework management system (OMS-511).
6.8. Statistical tools shall be used to analyze the performance of this management system in accordance with
Problem Solving Tools & Techniques management system (OMS-522).
6.9. DACO shall document, track and report performance improvement, as well as any associated corrective
and preventive actions, and then communicate these appropriately to organization personnel and
stakeholders on a regular basis.
PROCEDURE Page: 21 of 24
members/ Approvers
P HA Leader/PSSR
MOC Chairman &
Line Management
Element Leader
All employees
Competency
Leader
Development of management system Type P - - - A
Auditors training D - - - P
MOC Awareness training - - D - A
MOC Training P P D P A
Table 7.2 - Competency Matrix
Link Document
Document Title Topic of Linkage
From/To Reference
8.1 To Safer Sub Elements SHEM-02.01 Trigger PHA & other assessments
Classification: Internal Use
PROCEDURE Page: 22 of 24
Link Document
Document Title Topic of Linkage
From/To Reference
SHEM-02.02
SHEM-02.03
Pre Start Up SHE
8.2 To SHEM-06 Trigger pre-start up EHSS review
Review
Asset Performance Trigger EHSS and equipment
Management OMS-433 criticality assessment,
8.3 To
SHEM-07 conduct/review APM proactive
Asset Integrity methodologies RCM, RBI, RIS
Operating Procedure
SHEM-03.01, Temporary Operating,
Maintenance Procedure
8.4 To SHEM-03.02, Maintenance and Emergency
Emergency Response SHEM-11.01 Procedures
Preparedness
Emergency response plan and
Emergency Response
8.5 To SHEM-11.01 change in location of emergency
Preparedness
response equipment
Management of
Management of Personnel and
8.6 To Personnel and OMS-123
Organization Change
Organization
PROCEDURE Page: 23 of 24
Link Document
Document Title Topic of Linkage
From/To Reference
EHSS Incident,
Root cause analysis related to
Reporting,
8.13 From SHEM-10.00 SHEM-09, near miss related to
Classification,
lack of change recognition
Investigation & Analysis
Leadership Commitment Leadership, standard leader
8.14 From OMS-111
and Culture responsibilities
Performance
8.16 From OMS-211 Performance review KPIs
Management
Management System Management system development
8.17 From OMS-231
Development and clarifications issuance
Compliance Assessment
8.18 From OMS-232 Audits and assessments
and Evaluation
Documentation and Documentation and control of
8.19 From OMS-234
Control of Records records. Updated records.
Retention
Record Record Record
Record Title Period Classification
Reference Keeper Location
Completed change
processing records
shall include MOC
Approval, marked
up P&ID, minutes Project
9.1 of MOC Review - Document E-MOC 5 Years Internal Use
meeting, status of Controller
actions, PSSR,
PHA and
associated
documentation
MOC quality element
9.2 - ECM 5 Years Internal Use
review administrator
Classification: Internal Use
PROCEDURE Page: 24 of 24
Retention
Record Record Record
Record Title Period Classification
Reference Keeper Location
Annual action
plan based on
incidents, element
9.5 - ECM 5 Years Internal Use
audits, quality administrator
review
10.0 ATTACHMENTS/APPENDICES: