Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Seminar Thesis
Submitted by:
Qasim Rishi
2002-1-10-5136
Submitted to:
Mr. Ashraf Janjua
Dean, Institute Of Business Management
Submitted on:
May 15th 2007
1
Letter of Transmittal
Dear Sir:
As authorized, I have prepared the Thesis on “Purchase of a Mobile Phone
involves reference-group influence” for the course Seminar in economics policy.
Kindly accept my efforts.
I have tried to fulfill all the requirements laid by you and hope that you find it up
to the mark.
Sincerely,
Qasim Rishi
MBA(R)
2005-1-16-5136
2
Table of Content
Research objective___________________________________________________4
Literature survey____________________________________________________5
What is a reference-group influence?__________________________________5
Variability among products:___________________________________________6
(1) Publicly consumed luxury:_____________________________________6
(2) Privately consumed luxury:____________________________________7
(3) Publicly consumed necessity:___________________________________7
(4) Privately consumed necessity:__________________________________7
Significance and restraints of the study__________________________________10
Research methodology_______________________________________________11
Research design:________________________________________________11
Data collection methods/tools_________________________________________12
Sampling method_________________________________________________12
Population:____________________________________________________12
Sample size:___________________________________________________12
Extent:_______________________________________________________13
Time: ________________________________________________________13
Sample product category:_________________________________________13
Brand__________________________________________________________13
Data collection method____________________________________________13
Data collection tool_______________________________________________13
Respondents:____________________________________________________13
Literature survey/secondary data:____________________________________14
Questionnaire design________________________________________________15
Questionnaire______________________________________________________16
Research tabulation, analysis & interpretation____________________________19
Summary of findings, conclusion & recommendations_____________________22
Recommendations:________________________________________________22
Appendix_________________________________________________________22
3
RESEARCH OBJECTIVE
I have chosen “Mobile Phones” which belongs to the category of “Publicly consumed
Necessity” to test the influence of reference-group.
Alternative-HYPOTHESIS (H1)
4
“LITERATURE SURVEY”
(From: Marketing Management by Philips Kotler
&
Consumer Behavior by David L. Loudon)
When the influence of reference groups on the purchase of a number of consumer goods
was studied, it was found that the “conspicuousness” of a product is a strong determinant
of its susceptibility to reference-group influence. David L. Loudon has identified two
forms of conspicuousness on the basis of:
Consumption: Public-Private
Items: Necessity-Luxury
The item must be exclusive in some way. If virtually everyone owns it, it is not
conspicuousness in the first sense, even though it may be highly visible. Operationally,
we may think of this as the distinction between luxuries (having a degree of exclusivity)
and necessities (possessed by virtually everyone). Secondly, the item must be seen or
5
identified by others. Thus, where an item is consumed has great relevance. In this
situation a distinction may be made between “publicly consumed products” (which are
seen by others) and “privately consumed items” (that are not seen by others). Reference
groups may influence either the purchase of the product or the choice of a particular
brand, or both.
David L. Loudon has identified the concepts of public-private consumption and luxury-
necessity items. Such combination has further identified eight reference-group influence
relationships.
A product consumed out of public view and not commonly owned or used such as
a trash compactor. In many cases, the brand is not conspicuous or socially
important and is a matter of individual choice, but ownership of the product does
convey a message about the owner.
Relationships with reference-group influence:
a) Because it is a luxury, influence for product should be strong.
b) Because it will not be seen by others, influence for the brand of the
product should be weak.
6
than by the influence of others. In this group neither products nor brands tend to
be socially conspicuous, and the products are nearly owned by all the consumers.
Relationships with reference-group influence:
a) Because it is a necessity, influence for product should be weak.
b) Because it will not be seen by others, influence for the brand of the
product should be weak.
7
“REFERENCE-GROUP INFLUENCE
RELATIONSHIPS”
8
“SIGNIFICANCE AND RESTRAINTS OF THE STUDY”
The following are the significance and restraints of the study conducted:
1. The responses collected for the Research are from Saddar therefore the views and
behavior of the respondents should not be considered as a response and behavior
of the customer of the whole city of Karachi and also not that of the country as a
whole.
3. Since the consumers themselves will fill the questionnaire therefore it can truly
reveal the picture of reference-group influence in the purchase.
9
“RESEARCH METHODOLOGY”
Research is descriptive and conclusive because we would like to find out the existence of
reference-group influence in the purchase of “Mobile Phone”.
Research Design:
3. I will use Omni-Bus Style from Longitudinal Style of Sample. We will use one
sample and will evaluate all the variables of awareness, preference, knowledge,
benefits etc. from that sample.
10
“Data collection Methods/Tools”
“SAMPLING METHOD”
Population:
Element:
Demographics:
Age: 18 years - 50 years
Geography: Saddar
Psychographics:
Activity: Entertainment (Concert etc), Work /Student, Sports, Shopping, Community,
Club Membership
Interest: Family, Job, friends, Community, Fashion, Food, Media.
Lifestyle: Strivers
Personality: Gregarious, Ambitious
Sampling Unit:
Sample Size:
There are approximately 200 outlets of Mobile Phones in Saddar. I have chosen 10% of
the retailers i.e. 20 retailers. I will then interview 2 buyers per retail shop who would be
leaving after purchasing the phone. Thus I will end up in interviewing 40
consumers/purchasers.
Since all the consumers are hard to question therefore it falls under “Non-
Probability Sampling Process”.
Under this we will investigate as our “Convenience”. Means any consumer who is
available.
11
Sample Product Category:
From the theory I have selected Mobile Phone category to test my hypothesis.
Brand: Mobile Phone.
Data Collection Method: Survey
Data Collection Tool: Questionnaire
Respondents:
Respondents from the following retailers:
Marketing Management
By Philips Kotler
Millenium Edition
Consumer Bahavior
By David L. Loudon.
12
Questionnaire Design
In order to collect accurate responses and to increase validity and consistency of the
analysis all the responses are collected through Closed Ended Responses using checklist
answers.
Strong Brand:
Question 2 is targeted towards revealing the condition of containing a strong brand
since it is publicly consumed.
Reference-Group Influence:
Question 3-6 is targeted to find out the influence of reference group while purchasing
mobile phones.
13
“QUESTIONNAIRE”
1. Where will you place the Mobile phones:
Luxury items.
Necessity items.
14
4. Who is involved in your reference group?
(Tick all that apply)
Peer Group
Family
Celebrity
Retailer influence
Friends
Brand itself
5. Did you have any reference group pressure for the purchase of this Mobile phone?
Yes
No
15
Personal Information:
Age:
Household Income:
“THANK YOU”
16
“Research Tabulation, Analysis & Interpretation”
For the purpose of analysis, I have calculated the frequencies and percentages of the
responses to each question and part. I will discuss in detail the results of each and every
question by comparing the percentages of each part and question and give adequate
reasoning for the results derived through the survey.
Question 1:
Q1 Frequency %
Luxury 12 30
Necessity 28 70
Total 40 100
17
Question 2:
BRAND PURCHASED
Nokia
Sony Ericsson
Samsung
Motorola
18
Question 3:
3. Why did you purchase this mobile phone?
(Tick all that apply)
Brand Image
Price
Features
Color
Warranty
Ad of the Product
Old user of this brand
Reference Group
Q3 Frequency %
Brand Image 13 13.3
Price 13 13.3
Features 27 27.6
Color 0 0
Warranty 13 13.3
Ad 0 0
Old user 14 14.3
Reference Group 18 18.4
Total 98 100.0
19
Question 4:
4. Who is involved in your reference group?
(Tick all that apply)
Peer Group
Family
Celebrity
Retailer influence
Friends
Brand itself
Q4 Frequency %
Peer Group 14 16.9
Family 15 18.1
Celebrity 14 16.9
Retailer 4 4.8
Friends 18 21.7
Brand Itself 18 21.7
Total 83 100.0
Analysis and Interpretation:
21.7% respondents revealed that friends and the brand itself are included in their
reference group, which is the highest ratio in the study.
20
Question 5:
5. Did you have any reference group pressure for the purchase of this Mobile phone?
Yes
No
Q5 Frequency %
Yes 29 72.5
No 11 27.5
Total 40 100.0
21
Question 6:
Q6 Frequency %
Own 27 67.5
Own + Reference-Group 13 32.5
Reference Group 0 0
Total 40 100.0
22
Question 7:
Q7 Frequency %
Decision Maker 29 72.5
Influencer 11 27.5
Information Gatherer 0 0.0
Follower 0 0.0
Total 40 0.0
23
“SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSION &
RECOMMENDATIONS”
SUMMARY:
70% purchasers of mobile phone admit that this is included in a necessity item. 60%
purchasers purchased Nokia, 27.5% purchased Sony Ericsson, 7.5% purchased Samsung, whereas
5% purchased Motorola. 27.6% respondents look for product features while purchasing a
mobile phone. 18.4% respondents purchased was due to their reference group. Other
responses were rated at an equal rate. 21.7% respondents revealed that friends and the
brand itself are included in their reference group, which is the highest ratio in the study.
72.5% respondents revealed that reference group influence was involved in the purchase
of the mobile phone. 67.5% purchasers purchased their mobile phones purely on their
decision however 32.5% accepted the involvement of the reference group in the purchase
along with their own decision. Majority of the respondents questioned fell in the category
of decision maker (72.5%). However 27.5% respondents interrogated ranked themselves
as influencers.
CONCLUSION:
I may conclude that there are many factors involved in the purchase of a mobile phone
but the involvement of the reference group cannot be terminated altogether. Hence the H o
stands true:
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. Since mobile phone has been identified as a necessity item and its features are the
most important factor for its consumers therefore marketers must look to remain
focused on the features.
2. Marketer must also try to find out the reference-group of their target market since
they influence the purchase.
24
25
“Tally Sheet”
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7
S.No.
a b a b c d e a b c de f G h a b c de f a b a b c a b c d
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
8 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
10 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
12 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
13 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
14 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
15 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
16 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
17 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
18 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
19 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
20 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
21 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
22 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
23 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
24 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
25 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
26 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
27 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
28 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
29 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
30 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
31 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
32 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
33 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
34 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
35 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
36 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
37 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
38 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
39 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
40 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Total 12 28 30 7 3 0 0 13 13 27 0 13 0 14 18 14 15 14 4 18 18 29 11 27 13 0 29 11 0 0
26