PROFILE

”
• Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D)- Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia
• Sustainability Accounting and Reporting in expertise
• Certified Green Productivity Specialist – APO, Jepang
• Certified Green Finance Specialist – Renac, Germany
• Sustainbaility Reporting & financing Expert of IFC for the OJK
• CSR Expert – the Regional Representatives Council, Republic of Indonesia.
• Asia Sustainability Reporting Award – Panel Adjudicator

Juniati Gunawan PhD, CGFS, CGPS

Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta

H-Index : 5 H-Index : 7
 ACHIEVEMENTS
”
2016
• Australian Award Recipient for
Transformational Business
Leadership – A Course for
Outstanding Alumni of Australian
Universities, Short Term Award,
University of Sydney.
• August, Best Lecturer I for
Kopertis III Area (Jakarta & West
Java).
• First winner for research best
2015 paper, Trisakti University.
Research grant from The • Second winner for research best
Ministry of Research, paper, KOINKU: The national
Technology and Higher conference, held by The
Education of the Republic Authority of Financial Services
of Indonesia. (OJK), Indonesia.
2018
• The Winner of Best Author
Contribution from the Emerald
Publishing, UK
• Research grant for sustainability
finance survey in Indonesia,
particularly for the ‘First Mover
Sustainable Bank’, WWF-Indonesia.
2017
Research grant for sustainability
policy survey in Indonesia, the
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI),
Amsterdam

2006
the Resource Alliance – United
Kingdom for consulting with
Microsoft International, Joint
survey with 16 countries on:
‘Sustainability Approach for The
Community Technology
Learning Center (CTLC)’
engaged to.
JOINT RESEARCH
”
2016 2019
The Universiti Teknologi Mara, The Chaoyang University of
The Accounting Research Institute, Technology, Taiwan, ROC
Malaysia.
2014 2018
The Universiti Teknologi Mara, • The University of Adelaide,
The Accounting Research Institute, South Australia
Malaysia.
• The University of Waikato,
New Zealand
2013
The University of Toronto, Canada
on: ‘A Study of the Urban
Metabolism of Megacities’,
supported by Enel Foundation
from Italy ( www.enel.com/en-
GB/enel_foundation ).
 • Focus on your field – focus on
your expertise area journals

01
• Time spent on academic
research is more on reading
than writing

• Get idea: Gather information

from a variety of sources;

Read, read  Academic journals (University

needs to have subscription
access)

and read  newspaper articles,

 government reports and

legislation,

 industry and professional body

reports both in Indonesia and
overseas.
 • Read your targeted journals
for your references

• Identify your journal

02
 Read the aims and scope of
each journal. Does it fit your
papers theme?

 Write a paper first or identify a

certain journal first?

Targeting • Avoiding certain journals

 Not peer reviewed

 Easy to publish
A Journal  Publish anything

• Aim high
 The worst you get is good
feedback.
03
• Depending on different journal

• The chapters, sections, and

subsections should be logically
sequenced and clearly set-out

• English should be academic well

written and sound (spelling,
Structure punctuation, and grammar of a
high standard)

Of Paper
Bad structure and English are
included in major revision
”
3.1
Title
• Interesting Topic
• Raising Enquiries IT CAN BE
1. CSR and Firm Values in
Banking Industries:
Do they important?
Example
2. CSR, Firm Values and Banking
Industries

3. From CSR to Firm Values: A

study in Banking Industries
3.2
Introduction
1st • Importance Why Indonesia?
• Critical Think of international readers &
• Essential contribution
• Crucial ”
• Urgently
• Motivation
• Need
• Necessary
• Significant
• Material
3.2
Introduction
A Good Introduction
Establish the broad context

General
Summarize previous research

Specific
Describe the aims of the research
More
specific
3.2
Introduction
Example of an introduction section.
IFRS has become the benchmark for global accounting standards across
01
the globe. The underlying assumptions are that IFRS can apply to all
Broad summary
accounting environments and facilitate investment and trade (Jones,
(context of previous research)
2005), along with increased consistency and comparability among
countries (IFRS, 2004). This provides the foundation for much of the
research to date.

However recent research from emerging and developing countries such

02
as Brazil (Ferrero, 2013), China (Wang, 2012) and Zimbabwe (Kalumi, More specific context
2010), has indicated that there are certain impediments that impede the to this experiment
public sectors ability to effectively transition toward, and implement IFRS. (summary of previous research)
Issues such as the lack of a qualified workforce, interpretation problems,
the absence of available resources, and the lack of a tradition of
undertaking professional judgment on principles based standards, has
caused problems. Adopting IFRS does not always lead to effective
implementation and these issues issue have been more profound for the
public sectors in developing countries more so than developed economies
(Jackson, 2015).
3.2
Introduction
Example of an introduction section.
Indonesia is an important country in the Asia-pacific region. Its growth in 03
GDP and urbanisation, as well as transformation of the public and private Significance of the research
sectors over the last 20 years following ‘reformasi’ has made a study of
implementation issues and impediments important. This study will
specifically explore the private and public sectors on the island of Java,
Indonesia, given the size of it economic output among other provinces in
Indonesia. Java has a large and growing public sector, but it is very 04
diverse, and the private sector, including multi-national firms, provides the
basis for much of the economic output within Indonesia. Senior Aims of the research
accounting managers at national and regional public sector bodies
(departments), and private organizations will be interviewed for a
combined closed and open ended interview on their perceived
impediments. It is hypothesised that the public sector in Java will
experience greater implementation issues toward IFRS implementation 05
that the private sector. Hypothesis
 3.3 3.4
Literature Review - References Research Method

• •
• •
• •
•
 3.5 3.6
Results & Discussions Summary

• •
•
•
•
•
OUTPUT - CONTRIBUTION

ACADEMIC - TEACHING

OUTCOME - IMPLICATION

PRACTICAL - PKM
Example of a discussion section.
30 interviews were undertaken with private and 01
public sector managers across 3 cities in Java, Have you fulfilled aims of
Indonesia during August 2014. Interviews were the experiment?
evenly spilt across the 3 cities and across both
sectors (5 in each sedcor in each city). Interviews
were for 1 hour and all interviews were
transcribed. Results found that accounting 02
managers in the public sector did in fact face What are your results?
greater challenges than their private sector
counterparts. Issues including employee
readiness to undertake ‘professional judgment’,
the lack of financial resources and qualified staff,
as well as confusion surrounding the extent to
which accounting standards overrode traditional
budgetary practices, were major factors that
impeded the ability to effectively implement IFRS
within the Indonesian public sector. This result 03
should be interpreted with caution because only 5 How valid and accurate
accounting managers were chosen in each sector are the results?
in each city. This may not be reflective of broader
attitudes across the private and public sectors and
results may vary with age, industry and size of
government departments.
Example of a discussion section.

Some accounting managers were not fully aware of all issues within
their organization. Furthermore, some accounting managers were in
4. What problems did you
their designated position for only a short period of time, so did not encounter in carrying out the
have years of experience within the organization to be able to experiment?
understand the depth of issues that faced the organization.
Furthermore, only 1 person for each organization was interviewed,
so we were unabl to contrast the same issue within each
organization. Future studies may limit interviews to respondents
who had been with an organization for a minimum 3 years. 5. How could you overcome these
Furthermore, at least 2 perspective could be solicited for each for future investigations?
organization, to obtain different points of view on the same issue. In
a future study, it is recommended that more organizations be
chosen, and that the sample include respondents from the private
6. What further areas of
and public sectors across other provinces within Indonesia.
Furthermore, a future study could specifically explore the role of
investigation can you suggest and
organization size and industry on readiness to implement IFRS and what recommendations can you
whether specific social, economic and cultural issues influenced make?
perception. Future studies may also wish to focus solely on a case
study of an organization with a high level of financial complexity.
Results indicate that barriers and impediments to IFRS 7. What is the significance or
implementation differ across the private and public sectors, and that
importance of your results and
greater resources need to be directed to public sector organizations
to help them in their transition to full IFRS. their implications?
 What reviewers look for
”
•
•
•

•
•

•
 What NEVER to do
”
•
•

•
 Authorship
”
• Authorship credit should be based only on
substantial contributions to:

 Conception and design, or analysis and

interpretation of data

 Drafting the article or revising it critically for

important intellectual content; and on

 Final approval of the version to be published.

• Conditions 1, 2, and 3 must all be met.

• Participation solely in the acquisition of
funding or the collection of data does not
justify authorship.
• General supervision of the research group
is not sufficient for authorship.
 Common Mistakes
1.
”
Failure to cite landmark studies
2. Failure to accurately present the theoretical and
empirical contributions by other researchers
3. Failure to stay focused on the research question
4. Failure to develop a coherent and persuasive argument
5. Too much detail on minor issues, but not enough detail
on major issues
6. Too much rambling -- going "all over the map" without a
clear sense of direction (The best paper move forward
with ease and grace like a seamless river.)
7. Too many citation lapses and incorrect references
8. Too long or too short.
9. Failing to follow the references style
10. Slopping writing
 Tips & Tricks
”
• Publish with the senior author
• Select a top journal -- a key for smooth further publication
• Networks are important
• Communicate with the chief of editor, if applicable
• Scaling up your reputation

Sit down – move away your mobile – focus – keep in mind

 Predatory Publishers
”
• Does the journal have an editorial board with the
names of academics listed and their institutions?

• Is there a specific chief editor?

• Do editorial staff possess expertise in the relevant field?

• Are members of the editorial board also replicate

members of another journal?

• Is the organisation of the submission logical and clear

to the reader?

• Are editorial members located across a range of

geographical locations?

• Are there upfront disclosures of fees for journal

submission?
 Predatory Publishers
”
• Does the publisher send spam requests to scholars to review
manuscripts when the scholar is not qualified in the area of
expertise?

• Does the journal provide adequate copyediting or

proofreading of submissions?

• Does the journal have a contact page with only a web-based

form and no mailing address or email address?

• THE KEY IS DON’T GO FOR AN EASY PUBLICATION IN A

PREDATORY JOURNAL. PUBLICATIONS IN THESE JOURNALS
DO NOT COUNT TOWARD PROMOTION OR A JOB
APPLICATION

• Better ONE in a reputable journal then 10 in predatory journal

TERIMA KASIH
yuni_gnw@hotmail.com l 0816-1935611
Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta