Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.elsevier.com/locate/ultsonch
a
Costin D. Nenitzescu Institute of Organic Chemistry, 71141 Bucharest, P.O. Box 15-254, Romania
b
Department of Applied Material Science, College of Engineering, Osaka Prefecture University, Gakuen-cho 1-1, Sakai, Osaka 599-8531, Japan
Received 1 February 2004; received in revised form 29 March 2004; accepted 14 April 2004
Available online 7 June 2004
Abstract
The transesterification of vegetable oil with short-chain alcohols, in the presence of base-catalyst, by means of low frequency
ultrasound (28 and 40 kHz) in order to obtain biodiesel fuel was studied. By using ultrasounds the reaction time is much shorter (10–
40 min) than for mechanical stirring. The quantity of required catalyst is 2 or 3 times lower. The molar ratio of alcohol/oil used is
only 6:1. Normal chain alcohols react fast, while secondary and tertiary alcohols show some or no conversion after 60 min of
reaction. Surprisingly, 40 kHz ultrasounds are much more effective in the reduction of the reaction time (10–20 min). Twenty eight
kilohertz give slightly better yields (98–99%), but longer reaction time, while higher frequencies are not useful at all for the
transesterification of fatty acids.
2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1350-4177/$ - see front matter 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2004.04.001
368 C. Stavarache et al. / Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 12 (2005) 367–372
interface and it is a very slow process [6]. The reaction is Saponification value (i.e. milligram of KOH required
catalyzed by alkali, acid or enzyme. Enzymes-catalyzed to neutralize the free fatty acids and to saponify the
procedures, using lipase as catalyst, do not produce side esters in 1 g of oil) ¼ 195.
reactions [7–9], but the lipases are very expensive for
industrial scale production and a three-step process was 2.2. Procedures
required to achieve a 95% conversion [10]. Acid-cata-
lyzed process is useful when a high amount of free acids The influence of low frequency ultrasound (28 and 40
are present in the vegetable oil [11,12], but the reaction kHz) versus traditional stirring on the bio-diesel pro-
time is very long (48–96 h), even at the boiling point of duction from neat vegetable oil, at room temperature,
the alcohol, and a high molar ratio of alcohol was has been investigated. The reaction mixtures consisted in
needed (20:1 wt/wt to the oil) [13]. vegetable oil, alcohol and alkaline catalyst. The molar
In the base-catalyzed procedure, some soap is formed ratio of alcohol to oil was 6:1, and the quantity of catalyst
and it acts as phase transfer catalyst, thus helping was 0.5%, 1.0% and 1.5% (wt/wt) to the oil respectively.
the mixing of the reactants. Base-catalyzed process is The hydroxide was dissolved into the alcohol prior to the
strongly affected by the mixing of the reactants and/or addition of vegetable oil. The silent reactions were per-
by efficient heating [4,14] that produces tiny droplets, formed using a Matsushita Electric Ind., Model
thus increasing the reaction area [14]. Today, mixing/ SCV35W stirrer at 1800 rot/min. The ultrasonic reactions
heating is the process of choice used in industrial were performed using Honda Electronics Ultrasonic
application in over 85 biodiesel plants worldwide [3]. Cleaners WS 1200-28 and WS 1200-40, with a total power
Low frequency ultrasonic irradiation is a useful tool of 1200 W, working power being set at 60%.
for emulsification of immiscible liquids. The collapse of After the complete conversion of the vegetable oil, as
the cavitation bubbles disrupts the phase boundary and determined by TLC analysis, the reaction was stopped
causes emulsification, by ultrasonic jets that impinge one and the reaction mixture was allowed to stand for phase
liquid to another [15]. separations: the ester mixture formed the upper layer
We were interested in finding a more efficient alter- and glycerin formed the lower layer. The residual cata-
native for biodiesel fabrication by the help of ultra- lyst and non-reacted alcohol were distributed between
sound. The aim of this study was to see the effects of the two phases: some traces into the ester layer and a
low frequency ultrasonic irradiation on the transeste- high amount in the glycerin layer (due to a high misci-
rification of vegetable oil under base-catalysis condi- bility of the alcohol with glycerin). After the phases
tions. separation the traces of catalyst and alcohol were wa-
The results of the investigation of the transesterifi- shed out with water from the esters mixture and the
cation of neat vegetable oil with short-chain alcohols esters were dried over anhydrous calcium chloride. All
(C1–C4) in the presence of ultrasound to give alkyl es- experiments were performed in an Erlenmeyer type flask
ters of fatty acids are given. Reaction conditions that having 100 ml volume.
affect the yield include the type and concentration of the
catalyst, reaction time and ultrasound frequency. 2.3. Sampling and analysis
Ester + MG2
Ester + DG2
Where:
TG DG1 DG2 MG1 MG2 Gly Ester Alcohol
H2C OCOR1 H2C OCOR1 H2C OCOR1 H2C OCOR1 H2C OH H2C OH R2OCOR1 R2OH
HC OCOR1 HC OH HC OCOR1 HC OH HC OCOR1 HC OH
H2C OCOR1 H2C OCOR1 H2C OH H2C OH H2C OH H2C OH
rapidly, consuming the oil and catalyst and leading to Since the yields of isolated products in sonolysis are
soap formation. higher than stirring, we suppose that ultrasounds pro-
In Table 3 the yields of isolated methyl esters for duce less soap.
different types of activation in the presence of NaOH as Indeed, after less than one minute of mixing or son-
catalyst are given. ication the mixture became homogeneous. For 28 kHz,
From the results we can point out that under ultrasonic increasing the catalyst concentration decreases the time
irradiation at 40 kHz frequency the reaction was complete to complete the reaction with almost the same yield. In
faster. The best yields were obtained when the catalyst the experiments carried out under mechanical stirring by
was used in small concentration, i.e. 0.5% wt/wt of oil. increasing the catalyst concentration the yields are
By increasing the amount of catalyst, emulsions are lowered. The same tendency is observed in the case of
formed in the washing step thus hindering the purifica- sonication at 40 kHz. Since in both types of activation
tion. During washing the soap present in the esters the yields of isolated product are decreased, the reason
phase has the tendency to accumulate at the interfacial cannot be the mixing efficiency, but isolation of the
region between the liquids. Due to its structure (one desired product. Due to increased miscibility between
hydrophilic end and a long hydrophobic chain) the soap ethanol, glycerin and esters the separation and purifi-
molecules are oriented perpendicular on the interfacial cation of esters mixture is difficult. This causes low
region between the two immiscible phases: water and yields of isolated product.
esters. The soap molecules collect inside esters and water Increasing the chain length, the miscibility between
molecules forming emulsion, thus making the separation oil and alcohol increases thus decreasing the reaction
difficult. When the concentration of catalyst is increased, time (10–20 min) but also making the separation of
soap is formed in higher amount, leading to formation esters difficult (Table 5).
of gels. In the case of 1.5% (wt/wt) NaOH the yields of As one can see in Table 5 the yields of isolated n-
isolated esters was very low due to the fact that the soap propyl esters are lower than methyl esters but there are
production in high quantity led to formation of gels in only small differences in comparison with ethyl esters
high quantity, and a high amount of esters remains (Table 4). Even if the reaction is completed very fast (as
trapped in the glycerin layer. observed by TLC analysis), the washing and purification
In the case of ethyl esters the yields of isolated is complicated due to the fact that the separation of the
product were lower (Table 4). Ethanol dissolves the oil two phases does not take place in this case.
as soon as esters and soap are formed. The solubility of The miscibility of the oil is related to the solubility of
the two phases increases and the reaction time is short. glycerides and is affected mainly by unsaturation and
Table 3
The yields of isolated methyl esters
Method 0.5% (wt/wt) NaOH 1.0% (wt/wt) NaOH 1.5% (wt/wt) NaOH
Time (min) Yield (%) Time (min) Yield (%) Time (min) Yield (%)
Mechanical stirring 60 80 10 91 10 35
Ultrasonic irradiation 28 kHz 40 98 10 95 10 75
Ultrasonic irradiation 40 kHz 20 98 10 91 10 68
Table 4
The yields of isolated ethyl esters
Method 0.5% (wt/wt) NaOH 1.0% (wt/wt) NaOH 1.5% (wt/wt) NaOH
Time (min) Yield (%) Time (min) Yield (%) Time (min) Yield (%)
Mechanical stirring 20 79 20 40 10 47
Ultrasonic irradiation 28 kHz 50 74 20 75 20 75
Ultrasonic irradiation 40 kHz 20 88 10 48 10 30
Table 5
The yields of isolated n-propyl esters
Method 0.5% (wt/wt) NaOH 1.0% (wt/wt) NaOH 1.5% (wt/wt) NaOH
Time (min) Yield (%) Time (min) Yield (%) Time (min) Yield (%)
Mechanical stirring 10 78 10 47 10 79
Ultrasonic irradiation 28 kHz 20 92 20 83 20 75
Ultrasonic irradiation 40 kHz 10 88 10 56 10 78
C. Stavarache et al. / Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 12 (2005) 367–372 371
chain length of the fatty acids constituents. In the in the product yield are mainly due to difficulties
present study, by using the same molar ratios of 6:1 through washing. At 40 kHz soap is formed in higher
alcohol to oil, 1 mole of oil dissolved 1.88 moles of amount and acts as phase transfer catalyst leading to
methanol, 2.77 moles of ethanol, 3.92 moles of n-pro- formation of esters much rapidly than at 28 kHz. But
panol and 6 moles of n-butanol. These results clearly during washing the soap hinders the separation and
show that the longer the alcohol chain the soluble the some ester is trapped into the soap micelles and thus the
alcohol into oil. yield in isolated product is decreased.
In the case of n-butanol good yields were obtained for Increasing the frequency the production of cavitation
both types of activation (Table 6), but in long reaction in liquid decreases, thus the irradiation power has to be
time. After 10 min of reaction, some oil still persists, as increased in order to maintain the same amount of
determined by TLC analysis. According to Freedman cavitation in the system. Other frequencies (up to 100
et al. [18] the transesterification of oil with MeOH is kHz) were tested, but no remarkable results were ob-
different from BuOH due to a higher polarity of meth- tained. At higher frequencies the collapse of cavitation
oxy anion compared with butoxy anion. Also, the bubbles are not strong enough to impinge one liquid to
smaller size of methanol molecule could facilitate the the other. The mixing between the two immiscible layers
simultaneous attack on all three chains of triglyceride, (alcohol and oil) is very poor hence emulsification does
while butanol should follow the all pathway from TG to not occur, and the transesterification takes place mainly
DG to MG in order to form the esters (Scheme 1). at the boundary between the two layers. We can con-
By examining the results presented in Tables 2–6 one clude that only low frequency ultrasonic irradiation is
can see that there are notable differences in the conver- useful for transesterification reactions, at least for tri-
sion of neat vegetable oil in the presence of various glycerides.
alcohols. The normal chain alcohols react quite rapidly
under ultrasonic irradiation. We assume that this 3.3. The type and quantity of catalyst
behavior is due to an increased mass transfer in the
presence of ultrasound. The velocity of an ultrasonic The next step was to establish the influence of catalyst
wave through a material depends on its physical prop- type and concentration on the yield of isolated esters.
erties. Hence, the ultrasonic velocity decreases with Taking into account the economical factor the most
increasing density. convenient base catalysts were sodium or potassium
The ultrasonic properties of an emulsion vary sig- hydroxides. There were no great differences in the time
nificantly. The droplets of more dense oil move upwards to complete conversion between the two types of cata-
and form a cream layer, while the alcohol moves lyst. The use of ultrasonic irradiation proved more
downwards [20], facilitating the mixing and increasing proficient than mechanical stirring in the terms of iso-
the contact surface between alcohol and oil. lated methyl esters (Table 7).
When potassium hydroxide was used, high yields
3.2. The influence of ultrasonic frequency were obtained even for 1.5% catalyst concentration.
Potassium soap is softer, more soluble in water and does
As could be seen in the tables, the reactions per- not make as much foam as sodium soap. The washing of
formed under the ultrasonic irradiation at 40 kHz were esters when using potassium hydroxide is easier and the
completed faster than under 28 kHz when a low quan- yields of isolated product are higher.
tity of catalyst was used. When the catalyst was added in From Table 8 the same tendency of decreasing yields
high amount, the yields were higher for 28 kHz. Usually for ethyl, n-propyl and n-butyl esters when catalyst is
there are no important differences in the formation of used in high amount is also observed for potassium
the cavitation bubbles at 28 and 40 kHz, so we did not hydroxide. Also, in the case of sonication at 40 kHz the
expect any differences. However, in our case, at 40 kHz yields are high when catalyst concentration is small,
the reaction time was shorter, but the transesterification while for 28 kHz the best results are obtained for 1.5%
yields are slightly lower than at 28 kHz. The differences catalyst, except for ethanol.
Table 6
The yields of isolated n-butyl esters
Method 0.5% (wt/wt) NaOH 1.0% (wt/wt) NaOH 1.5% (wt/wt) NaOH
Time (min) Yield (%) Time (min) Yield (%) Time (min) Yield (%)
Mechanical stirring >60 83 40 90 20 89
Ultrasonic irradiation 28 kHz 60 99 40 90 40 87
Ultrasonic irradiation 40 kHz >60 92 40 99 20 90
372 C. Stavarache et al. / Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 12 (2005) 367–372
Table 7
The yields of isolated methyl esters
Method 0.5% (wt/wt) KOH 1.0% (wt/wt) KOH 1.5% (wt/wt) KOH
Time (min) Yield (%) Time (min) Yield (%) Time (min) Yield (%)
Mechanical stirring 60 86 40 85 20 83
Ultrasonic irradiation 28 kHz 40 95 40 93 40 93
Ultrasonic irradiation 40 kHz 20 96 40 92 20 90
Table 8
The yields of isolated esters
Method 0.5% (wt/wt) KOH 1.0% (wt/wt) KOH 1.5% (wt/wt) KOH
EtOH PrOH BuOH EtOH PrOH BuOH EtOH PrOH BuOH
Mechanical stirring 55 76 91 57 60 91 44 29 97
Ultrasonic irradiation 28 kHz 81 78 92 71 68 94 49 81 98
Ultrasonic irradiation 40 kHz 55 76 91 65 55 95 38 53 98
*
The reaction time is the same as in the case of sodium hydroxide.
We can conclude that low frequency ultrasound is an [6] F. Ma, L.D. Clements, M.A. Hanna, Bioresource Technology 69
efficient, time saving and economically functional, (1999) 289.
[7] M. Iso, B. Chen, M. Eguchi, T. Kudo, S. Shrestha, Journal of
offering a lot of advantages over the classical procedure. Molecular Catalysis B 16 (2001) 53.
Ultrasounds can be a valuable tool for the transesteri- [8] V.D. Athawale, S.C. Rathi, M.D. Bhabhe, Separation and
fication of fatty acids, aiming to prepare the bio-diesel Purification Technology 18 (2000) 209.
fuel at industrial scale. [9] S.Y. Shimada, Y. Watanabe, T. Samukawa, A. Sugihara, H.
Noda, H. Fukuda, Y. Tominaga, JAOCS 76 (1999) 789.
[10] Y. Watanabe, Y. Shimada, A. Sugihara, H. Noda, H. Fukuda, Y.
Acknowledgements Tominaga, JAOCS 77 (2000) 355.
[11] E.W. Eckey, JAOCS 33 (1956) 575.
[12] E. Crabbe, C. Nolasco-Hipolito, G. Kobayashi, K. Sonomoto, A.
Vinatoru thanks the Japan Society for the Promotion Ishizaki, Process Biochemistry 37 (2001) 65.
of Science (JSPS) for a long-term research fellowship at [13] M. Canakci, J. Van Gerpen, ASAE Transactions 42 (1999) 1203.
Osaka Prefecture University. [14] R. Alcantara, J. Amores, L. Canoira, E. Fidalgo, M.J. Franco, A.
Navarro, Biomass and Bioenergy 18 (2000) 515.
[15] T.J. Mason, Practical Sonochemistry, Ellis Horwood Ltd, 1991.
References [16] D.G. Boocock, S.K. Konar, V. Mao, H. Sidi, Biomass and
Bioenergy 11 (1996) 43.
[1] E.G Shay, Biomass and Bioenergy 4 (1993) 227. [17] D. Darnoko, M. Cheryan, JAOCS 77 (2000) 1263.
[2] F. Ma, M.A. Hanna, Bioresource Technology 70 (1999) 1. [18] B. Freedman, R.O. Butterfield, E.H. Pryde, JAOCS 63 (1986)
[3] Y.M. Choo, A.N. Ma, Chemistry & Industry (2000) 530. 1375.
[4] H. Noureddini, D. Harkey, V. Medikonduru, JAOCS 75 (1998) [19] C. Stavarache, M. Vinatoru, R. Nishimura, Y. Maeda, Chemistry
1775. Letters 32 (2003) 716.
[5] J. Metzer, Pulse of the Planet (1996). [20] R. Daniels, Skin care forum online 28 (2002).