You are on page 1of 6

155 F. D.

Fragiskos
155

Impacted maxillary third molars may also be clas-


7. sified (Archer 1975), according to the depth of
8 impac- tion compared to the second molar, into three
Extraction of Impacted catego- ries:
Maxillary Teeth Class A: The occlusal surface of the impacted tooth is
at approximately the same level as the occlu-
7.8. sal surface of the second molar (Fig. 7.101 a).
1 Class B: The occlusal surface of the impacted tooth is
Impacted Third at the middle of the crown of the adjacent
Molar sec- ond molar (Fig. 7.101 b).
Class C: The occlusal surface of the crown of the im-
Removal of an impacted maxillary third molar is pacted tooth is below the cervical line of the
dif- ficult, because of insufficient visualization of the adjacent molar or even deeper, contiguously
area and limited access. Furthermore, other factors or even above its roots (Figs. 7.101 c–e).
(re- duced aperture of the mouth, close proximity of
the impacted tooth to the maxillary sinus, etc.) may Impacted teeth belonging to the third category are
make the surgical procedure even more difficult. very difficult cases, because their extraction entails
the removal of large amounts of bone, limited access,
Classification. Impaction of the maxillary third and the risk of displacing the impacted tooth into the
mo- lar (according to Archer 1975) may be maxillary sinus (Fig. 7.102).
classified as: mesioangular, distoangular, vertical,
horizontal, buc- coangular, linguoangular, or
inverted (Fig. 7.100). The tooth usually presents with Fig. 7.100. Classification of
impaction of maxillary third molars
a mesial or distal inclina- tion, with the occlusal
according
surface positioned buccally. to Archer (1975). (1 Mesioangular,
2 distoangular, 3 vertical, 4 horizontal,
5 buccoangular, 6 linguoangular,
7 inverted)

Fig. 7.101 a–e. Classification of


impacted maxillary third molars
according to Archer (1975), depending on
the depth
of impaction compared to the adjacent
second molar
Fig. 7.102 a, b. Maxillary third molars with deep, complete bone impaction. Their removal is considered difficult,
because of the closeness to the maxillary sinus and insufficient visualization of the area

Types of Flaps. The types of f laps used are vestibular fold (Fig. 7.103). In rare cases, when
triangular and horizontal: im- paction is deep and a satisfactory surgical
Triangular f lap: field is necessary or when the impacted tooth
The incision for creating the f lap begins at the covers the roots of the second molar buccally, then
max- illary tuberosity and extends as far as the the vertical incision may be made at the distal
distal as- pect of the second molar, continuing aspect of the first molar (Fig. 7.104).
obliquely up- wards and anteriorly (vertical
incision) to the

Incisions and Types of Flaps for Extraction of Impacted Third Molar

Fig. 7.103 a, b.
Diagrammatic
illustrations showing
the triangular incision
(a) and ref lection of
the f lap (b), indicated
in certain cases of
extraction of impacted
maxillary third molars

Fig. 7.104 a, b. Variation of the triangular incision of the incision is necessary due to the position of the third
and f lap shown in Fig. 7.103 (the vertical incision extends molar compared to the second molar
as far as the distal aspect of the first molar). The mesial
extension
Fig. 7.105 a,
b. Dia- grammatic
illustra-
tions showing the
horizontal incision
(a) and envelope f
lap (b), for removal
of impacted
maxillary
third molars

Horizontal (envelope) f 7.8.1


lap: .1
The incision for creation of this f lap also begins Extraction of Impacted
at the maxillary tuberosity and extends as far as Third Molar
the distal aspect of the second molar, continuing
buc- cally along the cervical lines of the last two The procedure for removing the impacted third molar
teeth, and ending at the mesial aspect of the first (Fig. 7.106) is as
molar (Fig. 7.105). follows.
After making a triangular incision (Fig. 7.107), the
Removal of Bone. Often, after ref lection of mucoperiosteal f lap is ref lected (Fig. 7.108) and the
the f lap, part of the crown of the impacted tooth is buccal bone is then removed until the entire crown of
visible or there is bone protuberance over the the impacted tooth and part of its roots are exposed.
crown. Because the bone in this case is thin and Because extraction of the tooth in segments is not in-
spongy, it may be re- moved from the buccal surface dicated, sufficient space must be created around its
using a sharp instru- ment. If the buccal bone is crown to be able to luxate the tooth. Thus, using a
dense and thick, then its removal is achieved using a straight or double-angled elevator on the mesial aspect
surgical bur. of the tooth, always buccally, the tooth is luxated care-
fully, posteriorly, outwards and downwards (Figs.
7.109,
7.110). Care of the wound and suturing are
performed in the same way as described for all other
cases of im- pacted teeth (Fig. 7.111).

Fig. 7.106 a, b. a Radiograph showing a maxillary third molar with distoangular impaction. b Clinical
photograph of the case shown in a
Fig. 7.107 a, b. Triangular incision completed. a Diagrammatic illustration. b Clinical photograph

Fig. 7.108 a, b. Ref lection of the f lap and to protect the tooth from becoming accidentally displaced
exposure of the crown of the impacted tooth. Placement of into the infratemporal fossa or into soft tissues. a
the broad end of the periosteal elevator in the posterior Diagram- matic illustration. b Clinical photograph
position is indicated

Fig. 7.109 a, b. Luxation of the impacted tooth using double-angled elevator. Extraction movements depend
largely upon the relationship between the tooth and the maxillary sinus. a Diagrammatic illustration. b Clinical
photograph
Fig. 7.110 a, b. Final luxation of the tooth. a Diagrammatic illustration. b Clinical photograph

Fig. 7.111 a, b. Surgical field after placement of sutures. a Diagrammatic illustration. b Clinical photograph

the dental arch after surgical exposure and orthodon-


7.8. tic treatment. In older patients, especially after the age
2 of 30 years, the above procedure is not a method of
Impacted choice, because the risk of failure is greater. In such
Canines cases, surgical removal is preferred, if deemed neces-
sary of course.
Impacted maxillary canines are quite common, and The technique for removing impacted canines de-
approximately 12%–15% of the population present pends on the position of impaction (palatal or labial),
with impacted canines. They are localized palatally the relationship of the impacted tooth to adjacent
more often than labially. teeth, as well as the inclination of its crown. These
Even though positions vary, the impacted canine fac- tors should be assessed before planning the
presents five basic localizations (contralateral or surgical procedure.
ipsi- lateral and deep in the bone) as follows: The localization of impacted canines is achieved
1. Palatal localization using various radiographic techniques together with
2. Palatal localization of crown and labial careful clinical examination. The most commonly
localization of root used intraoral projections are occlusal projections,
3. Labial localization of crown and palatal localiza- periapical radiographs and panoramic radiographs,
tion of root while the technique employed for exact localization
4. Labial localization of the labial or palatal position of the impacted tooth
5. Ectopic positions is based on the tube shift principle, as described
in Chap. 2. As far as the clinical examination is
In young people aged 20 years or slightly older, im- con-
pacted maxillary canines may be correctly aligned in

You might also like