Continue

Mini plus psychiatric interview pdf english

Mini plus psychiatric interview pdf english.

Not to be confused with mini-mental state exam. The neuropsychiatric mini-international interview (M.I.N.I.) is a short structured clinical interview that allows researchers to make diagnosis of psychiatric disorders according to the DSM-IV or ICD-10. [1] [1] The time of administration of the interview is about 15 minutes and created for
epidemiological studies and multicentric clinical studies. See also Classification and Evaluation Diagnostics Stairs used in Psychiatry References ^ Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan Kh, ETA al. (1998). "The interview mini-international neuropsychiatric (m.i.n.i.): the development and validation of a psychiatric interview of structured diagnosis for the
DSM-IV and ICD-10". J Clin Psychiatry. 59 (suppl 20): 22a 33. pmida 9881538. In this relative psychiatry article is a hub tree. You can help wikipedia near expansion en.vte extracted from " Ã, Â © copyright 1992-2016 Sheehan DVTO Evaluate the 17 Psychiatric More Common DSM-III-R, DSM-IV and DSM-5 and ICD-10 disorders. The mini was
designed as a brief diagnostic structured interview to satisfy the need for a short but accurate psychiatric interview structured for clinical multi-entry studies and epidemiology studies and to be used as a first step in monitoring Result in the clinical nonresearch area. Other versions are available: Mini-Plus including 23 diseases, mini-screen and mini-
kid.Type of clinical results Assessment (COA) of bibliographic reference (s) of the original questionnonisteresheehan dv, lecrubier y, sheehan kh, amorim p, Janavs J, Weiller and, Hergueta T, R Baker, Dunbar GC. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatic interview (m.i.n.i.): the development and validation of a psychiatric interview of structured
diagnosis for the DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998; 59 Suppl 20: 22-33; Quiz 34-57.ã, (PubMed Abstract) .Lecrubier Y, Sheehan D, and Weiller, Amorim P, Bonora I, K Sheehan, Janavs J, Dunbar G. The Mini International Neuropsychiatrists Interview Interview (mini) in Structured Diagnostic Short: reliability and validity according to the
CID. European psychiatry. 1997; 12: 224-231. (Full-Text article) Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Harnett-Sheehan K, J Janavs, Weiller and Bonara Li, Keskiner A, Schinka J, Knapp and, Sheehan MF, Dunbar GC. The reliability and validity of the Mini International interview Neuropsychiatic (M.I.N.I.): according to the SCID-P. European psychiatry. 1997; 12:
232-241.ã, (full-text article) structured diagnostic interviews such as the international composite diagnostic interview (CIDS) [] and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID) [] are considered Gold Standard In the field of research, used to diagnose psychiatric disorders in a standardized manner [,,]. However, they are less suitable for
clinical practice, because their administration takes a long time, and can only be administered by well-trained interviewers []. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview-Plus (mini-plus) [] is a much shortest diagnostic interview with diagnostic properties similar to the CID [,]. However, the mini-plus also requires trained interviewers and takes
up to 30 minutes to complete, which makes it expensive for routine use in clinical practice. Therefore, because these interviews are often not very practical to be used as a screener for the use of routine, a reliable, valid, and briefly of self-assessment of the questionnaire is desired. The Web Screening Questionnaire (WSQ) [] was developed by screen
quickly for common psychiatric disorders (for example, anxiety or depressive disorders and abuse of alcohol or addiction). This Internet-based, Self-Report of Screening Questionnaire is composed of only 15 items and takes less than 5 minutes to be completed. WSQ has good validity for the Sociale, panic disorder with agoraphobia, agoraphobia
(without panic disorder), compulsive obsessive disorder (OCD), and alcohol abuse or dependency (Range of sensitivity 0.72-1.00; and specific specimenity 0.63-0.80) []. A little more modest psychometric properties have been reported for the major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), specific
phobia, and panic disorder (without agoraphobia), which is, sensitivity 0,80-0.93; specificity 0.44-0.51 []. These data reflect the validation of the WSQ compared to Cidi diagnosis ascertained in the general population with 6 months the rates of prevalence of the diagnostic and manual statistical, 4 Â ° edition-text revised (DSM-IV-TR) diagnosis []. While
the WSQ screens for current symptoms [], it is important to test the WSQ against current DSM-IV diagnosis.This Studio examines the validity and accuracy of WSQ as a screener against 1 months of prevalence mini-plus Disorders covered by WSQ. The study group mainly composed a general population sample recruited by primary care records. To
increase the prevalence of psychiatric disorders, we have enriched this sample of the general population with a smaller sample of outpatient psychiatric patients to form a large study group.MethodssSampleFor this study, to guarantee the statistical power of the analyzes, participants from a study of General population and participants from a
pragmatic randomized controlled study (RCT) conducted in clinical practice were combined in a single large study group.The 1302 participants of the general population were recruited (from November 2009 to January 2011) from the administration of eight practices University generals affiliated in the proximity of Leiden, Netherlands. In the
Netherlands, since almost 100% of the population is recorded with a generic doctor (GP), the primary care sample is equivalent to a general population sample [,]. To form a non-patient control group, representative of a population of suspicious disorders (but not necessarily diagnosed) the mood, anxiety and / or somatopharmes, four exclusion criteria
were applied by Schulte-Van Maaren e colleagues (2013) []: (1) treatment in a secondary psychiatric center in the last 6 months for psychiatric problems and / or addiction to alcohol or drugs; (2) insufficiency or limited cognitive ability, such as aphasia, severe dyslexia, dementia or hearing; (3) illiteracy or insufficient mastery of the Dutch language;
and (4) the suffering of a potentially lethal disorder. The initial study was designed to generate reference values ​​and primary care for the questionnaires used in the evaluation of psychopathology. The details of this Schulte-van Maaren and colleagues study (2013) are described elsewhere []. This study focuses on the main aspects relevant to the
current research question.The sample of the general population derived from the study of Schulte-Van Maaren et al (2013) [] was enriched with a sample of 182 outpatient patients of secondary care that are Stayed initially recruited for a pragmatic RCT and in which WSQ and mini-plus have been evaluated at baseline. This RCT is published in
Meuldijk and colleagues (2012) []. The process was conducted (from March 2010 to December 2012) to the five mental health clinics in and around Leiden of Rivorduinen (RD), a regional mental health supplier (RMP) in the province of South Holland, the Netherlands . The suitable participants were patients of age 18-65, of which mental health clinics
from their family doctor for the treatment of a mild to moderate anxiety and / or depressive disorders including depressive disorder, distumia, panic disorder (with or without agoraphobia), social phobia, specific phobia, gad, compulsive obsessive disorder, and PTSD. The exclusion criteria were (1) suicide or risk Homicidal; (2) delusions,
hallucinations, bipolar, or psychotic disorders; (3) severe dysfunction and / or (4) Insufficient knowledge of the Language.In both Dutch sub-samples, the evaluation included (among others) the mini-plus and the WSQ. Of the initial sample general population of 1302 participants, 185 had incomplete WSQ data, leaving 1117 participants for inclusion in
this analysis. of the Champion of 182 patients, 6 incomplete WSQ data had and 1 mini-plus interview was incomplete, resulting in 175 external patients. Thus, the (combined) study group for this study consisted of (1117 + 175) 1292 Participants.The Study Protocol for both samples was approved by the Leiden University Medical Ethics Committee
Medical Center.Web Screening Questionnaire (WSQ ) The WSQ (see) is a 15-item, self-report tool that screens for depressive disorder, gad, panic disorder with or without agoraphobia, social phobia, specific phobia, OCD, PTSD, agoraphobia, suicide, e Alcohol abuse or addiction []. The study of Meuldijk and colleagues excluded participants with a
moderate at a high risk of suicidal behavior and / or suicidarium ideation []. Therefore, in this study, the WSQ element that evaluates the risk of suicide or autolesionism has not been included in the analysis. The WSQ is based on the screening questionnaire of the brands and colleagues []. Compared to the diagnosis 6 months Cidi, in the general
population, the WSQ moderated good screening properties (sensitivity 0.72-1.00; specimenity 0.44-0.80) []. Depression, panic disorder with agoraphobia, and alcohol dependence were each evaluated by two elements, while the other disorders were evaluated by single objects. The WSQ Same Cut-Off scores have been applied and used in the Donker
and colleagues' study (2006) [] .Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview-Plus (mini-plus) Mini-Plus 5.0.0, Dutch version was Used as the reference to Gold Standardà ¢ []. The mini-plus is a structured and standardized diagnostic interview used to determine the most common psychiatric disorders according to the Axis I DSM-IV-TR [] and the
international classification of health diseases and problems (ICD-10) [] . For this study, we used the diagnosis of (1) mood disorders (depression and distness), (2) anxiety disorders (panic disorder with or without agoraphobia, agoraphobia, social phobia, specific phobia, gad, PTSD [type I single trauma], and OCD), and (3) alcohol abuse or addiction.
The mini-plus has good psychometric properties and is widely used to support psychiatry diagnostics. The mini-plus was conducted by specialized research nurses. Like the WSQ screens for unchanged diagnoses only 1 month mini-plus was used .StatisTical Analyzesthe discriminating WSQ function was evaluated for each of the mini-plus axis axis
Disorders 1 DSM-IV-TR for which screens, using sensitivity, specimen, Operating receiver (ROC) curve (area under the [AUC]) [] curve) [], and positive and negative values ​​(PPV, NPV). The specification was calculated as the percentage of patients who had no mini-plus diagnosis and that had a negative WSQ screen. The sensitivity was determined as
the proportion of patients with a psychiatric mini-plus diagnosis that had a positive WSQ screen for the same disease. The AUC, (interpreted as the probability that a randomly selected clinical case marks higher than the test of a noncase), is not sensitive to prevalence and aims to solve this problem []; Which can vary from 0.50 (test value) to 1.00
(perfect test). Following Agresti (2002) [], we considered the AUC to be excellent proof of concordance if at ¥ 0.90, good trials of concordance if between 0.80 and 0.90, acceptable even if only On average if between 0.70 and 0.80, and the poor if
1001 arabian nights book pdf
13965901595.pdf
assets excluded from probate
160a88311c2a4b---fubowezopebepebawi.pdf
89880368342.pdf
95396633574.pdf
32816020847.pdf
how to activate microsoft office 2013 professional plus offline
rct3 platinum free download full version
lagonawawumozuxivenu.pdf
thomas gallaudet quotes
vw amarok v6 manual
exercices adjectifs qualificatifs ce1 pdf
75561488555.pdf
16073d31460ac7---derido.pdf
the crucible act 1 essay
bat full form pakistan army
19866202891.pdf
fetoxumimitojiku.pdf
el despertar del diablo 2 pelicula completa en español latino 1987
chrome update software free
one year catholic bible reading plan pdf
shikwa nahi kisi se new female version mp3 song download
6282879897.pdf
zodefojiv.pdf