You are on page 1of 5

PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY/Copyright © 1986 by

The American Academyof Pediatric Dentistry


Volume 8 Number 4

Effect of trauma to primary incisors on root development


of their permanentsuccessors

Yerucham Zilberman, DMD Anna Fuks, CD


Yocheved Ben Bassat, DMD Ilana Brin, DMD
Jehoshua Lustmann, DMD

Abstract disclose signs of previous trauma were included. In


Traumato the primaryincisors may,by their displacement, contrast to the previous report, 2 teeth presenting with
causedevelopmentaldisturbancesin the root formationof the deep carious lesions were not excluded from the
permanentincisors. To verify this hypothesis,dental radiographs present study, since it is doubtful that the presence
of 34 children, whoseprimaryincisors hadbeenpreviously in- of a carious lesion in a primary crown would affect
jured, were evaluated. Only6 children showeddisturbancesin root development of the permanent successor.
root developmentof maxillarypermanent incisors. Threecases in
The majority of the children included in this re-
whichtraumato the primarydentition resulted in pathologyto
the permanentdentition are presented,stressingthe needfor close port experienced trauma to their primary incisors be-
periodic examinationand early detection of possible develop- tween ages 1 and 31~ years, and the most common
mentaldefects in the permanentdentition. types of injury recorded were palatal displacement
and luxation.
Periapical radiographs taken at the time of trau-
ma were evaluated for:
The correlation between the presence of min-
eralization defects, observed in the maxillary per- 1. The amount of resorption of the roots of primary
manent incisors of a group of school children, and incisors, and
the history of trauma to their primary dentition, has 2. The developmental stage of the permanent buds
3according to Nolla.
been reported. 1,2 The clinical and radiographic re-
sults of these studies demonstrated that most of the Radiographic evaluation revealed that at the time
children with affected permanent incisors experi- of trauma the primary teeth had fully formed roots
enced trauma prior to age 5 years and during Nolla’s or were at the initial stages of root resorption. The
3developmental stages 3-6 (Table 1).
buds of the permanent incisors were at Nolla’s de-
The impact of the primary roots to the devel- velopmental stages 3-6.
oping tooth at the time of the trauma may cause a One hundred twenty-nine fully erupted maxil-
deflection or displacement of the permanent succes- lary permanent incisors were examined and classi-
sors. 4 The purpose of the present study was to inves- fied into 2 groups: (1) trauma group--comprising
tigate the eventual effects of trauma to the primary permanent incisors which were the successors of
incisors on the root development of their permanent traumatized primary teeth; (2) nontrauma group--
successors. including 61 permanent incisors, successors to non-
traumatized primary teeth (i.e., teeth located adjacent
to the injured ones).
Methods and Materials The distribution of the sample according to age
The dental records of 34 children whose maxil- and dental development at the time of trauma was
lary primary incisors had been traumatized previ- similar in both groups.
ously were selected from a larger sample. 2 Only rec- Standardized long-cone periapical and tangen-
ords of children whose clinical history and periapical tial radiographs of the permanent incisors taken at a
radiographs taken at the time of the injury did not recall examination were analyzed for developmental

PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY: December 1986/Vol. 8 No. 4 289


Table 1. Stages of Dental Development (according to Nol- matized primary teeth and 1 incisor was in the non-
la) trauma group (Table 2).
Stage 0 Absenceof crypt In some of the cases more than 1 type of change
Stage 1 Presence of crypt occurred in the same tooth. Two teeth presented with
Stage 2 Initial calcification an arrest in root formation and demonstrated ex-
Stage 3 One-third of crown completed
Stage 4 Two-thirds of crown completed tremely short, thinner than normal and grossly de-
Stage 5 Crown almost completed formed structure (patients 2 and 57).
Stage 6 Crown completed Other pathological phenomena observed were:
Stage 7 One-third of root completed
Stage 8 Two-thirds of root completed obliteration of pulp chamber (patient 39); severe
Stage 9 Root almost completed--open apex crown and root malformation (odontoma-like for-
Stage 10 Apical end of root completed mation in patient 57); tooth bud and bone sequestra-
tion (patient 83); and transposition of a lateral incisor
and the adjacent canine (patient 2). These cases were
disturbances of the roots and the surrounding bone the expression of extensive and severe traumatic
as follows: events to the primary dentition.
The small number of teeth with affected roots
1. Root dilaceration in the mesiodistal and bucco-
did not allow statistical correlation between the con-
lingual dimensions
sequences of the trauma and the type of trauma or
2. Arrest of root formation
Nolla’s developmental stages. However, in the fol-
3. Obliteration of pulp chamber and root canal
lowing cases some of these relations are suggested.
4. Severe malformation of the root or any other phe-
Patient 57 demonstrated the effect of a severe
nomenon involving the surrounding bone.
injury at a young age on the developing tooth buds.
4Root dilaceration has been defined by Andreasen A 1-year-old girl fell off a staircase. The clinical ex-
as a sharp deviation or bend of the root in relation amination revealed luxation A[, intrusion of ~A, and
to the long axis of the tooth. A slight distal angula- laceration of the gingivae around these teeth. No ad-
tion, frequently seen in lateral incisors, was consid- ditional injuries could be observed on a periapical
ered as normal. The dilaceration was recorded ac- radiograph.
cording to its location, i.e., cervical, middle, and apical Five months following the injury, a periapical
one-third of the root. radiograph (Fig 1A) demonstrated that the primary
left central incisor remained in an intruded position
Results and rotated with a resultant mesial and distal bony
Six children (17.6%) presented with develop- defect. The right primary central and lateral incisors
mental disturbances in the root or a pathologic con- showed very wide pulp chambers, with an unex-
dition in the surrounding bone. The disturbances in plained "mineralized" area in the middle third of the
root formation appeared in teeth which were trau- root of B_B_L. The permanent tooth bud of 1__ L was at
matized between Nolla’s developmental stages 2 developmental stage 3 and showed evidence of a
and 8. mineralization defect. The permanent tooth buds of
Root dilaceration was present in 6 permanent ~12 were poorly visualized and their location ap-
incisors (4.7%)--5 incisors were successors of trau- peared to be more apical than their contralaterals.

TABLE
2. Distribution of Permanent Tooth Root Malformations According to the Most
CommonTypes of Trauma to the Primary Incisors
Permanent
Teeth with
Permanent Other Root or
Total No. of Teeth with Surrounding Permanent
Primary Root Bone Malfor- Teeth with
Type of Trauma Incisors Dilaceration mations Normal Root

Luxation 26" 3 1 23
Palatal displacement 22 1 -- 21
Intrusion 9* 1 2 7
Exfoliation 8 -- -- 8
Others 10 -- 1 9
Nontrauma 61 1 1 59

Total 136" 6 5 127


* In a few cases more than 1 type of root malformation occurred in a tooth.

290 ROOT DEVELOPMENTFOLLOWINGTRAUMA: Zilberman et al.


FIG 1. Patient 57. A. Periapical radiograph taken 5 months after the trauma. Note the intruded and rotated ]A and
the poorly visualized 112 and their more apical location compared to their contralaterals. B. Radiograph taken 4
years, 4 months following the injury. Note the mineralization defects of 111 and the severe crown and root mal-
formation (odontoma-like formation) of J_2. C. Radiograph taken at age 12 years. Note the poorly developed root of
J_l following apexification and root canal rilling.

Radiographs taken 4 years, 4 months following |A previously had been extracted due to an infected
the injury revealed mineralization defects of 1|1, periapical lesion. The right primary central incisor
malposition of J_l and a severe crown and root mal- presented with obliteration of the pulp chamber and
formation (odontoma-like formation) of J_2 (Fig IB). pulp canal as well as premature resorption of the

FIG 2. Patient 83. A & B. Periapical radiographs taken at the first examination, 2 years following the injury. Note the
pathological conditions of the primary teeth, especially on the right side. The crowns of 211 are underdeveloped and
their follicles disturbed. C & D. Clinical photograph and periapical radiograph taken at age 9 years. Note the rudimentary
crown and irregular root formation of 2J_.

PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY: December 1986/Vol. 8 No. 4 291


FIG 3. Patient 39. A & B. Periapical radiographs taken 2 days after the trauma. Note the intruded BJ_ and the
pathologic root resorption of A|A accompanied by periapical bone destruction. C. Periapical radiograph taken at
age 10 years. Note the dilaceration at the middle one-third of the root of J_l and an obliteration of its pulp chamber.

apical third of its root. At this stage, A|B were ex- ed into the oral cavity (Fig 2C). A periapical radio-
tracted and the severely malformed left permanent graph revealed irregular root formation in addition
lateral incisor was removed surgically. At a further to the deformed crown (Fig 2D). The patient was
follow-up examination, delayed eruption of J_l was referred for combined orthodontic and restorative
observed. treatment.
At age 12 years, 11 years following the injury, Patient 39 represents the nontrauma phenome-
the crowns of the maxillary central incisors pre- non, namely, damage to a permanent successor of a
sented with severe hypoplasia accompanied by brown primary tooth which was adjacent to a traumatized
discoloration. Additional white discoloration ap- primary incisor. The patient was a 4V4-year-old girl
peared on J_l. The left permanent canine erupted ad- who presented to the Oral Surgery Department 2 days
jacent to J_l replacing the extracted J2. The periapical after having fallen at home. Clinical examination re-
radiograph taken at this stage (Fig 1C) showed J_l vealed intrusion of B_[ and soft tissue lacerations. The
with a poorly developed root. This tooth underwent maxillary primary central incisors had extensive car-
an apexification followed by a conventional root ca- ious lesions. Periapical radiographs taken at this time
nal filling which had been performed 1 year earlier, (Figs 3A, B) confirmed the clinical diagnosis and
due to periapical infection. showed pathologic root resorption of A|A accom-
Patient 83 presented severe sequellae to an early panied by periapical bone destruction. The maxillary
intrusion of primary teeth. The child first presented permanent central and lateral incisors appeared to
for examination 2 years after having fallen on a hard be normal and were at developmental stage 6. The 2
object at age 1 year. According to the information primary central and the right lateral incisors then
obtained from his mother, 3 of his anterior teeth were extracted.
(CBA |) were intruded. Periapical radiographs taken At age 10 years no enamel mineralization defects
at the time of examination demonstrated extensive were observed in the permanent central incisors.
pathologic root and bone resorption of A|, surround- However, a periapical radiograph (Fig 3C) revealed,
ed by a periapical radiolucency, and pulp chamber in addition to mesial caries of 1|, dilaceration of the
obliteration of BAj (Figs 2A, B). The maxillary right middle one-third of the root of J_l and an obliteration
primary canine presented with an obliterated pulp of its pulp chamber. Its periodontal ligament was also
chamber and stunting of the root, as well as hypo- wider when compared to its contralateral.
plastic defects on the incisal edge. Extensive carious
lesions were present in all anterior teeth. Underde- Discussion
velopment of the crowns of 211 as well as distur- The influence of trauma to the primary incisors
bances in their follicles also were evident. The bud on their permanent successors can be related to sev-
of 1_[ underwent sequestration and was removed sur- eral factors such as the spatial relationship of the
gically. Although the bud of 2_|_ presented signs of involved teeth, to the child's age at the time of in-
developmental disturbance of the crown, the deci- jury, mainly to its dental developmental stage, and
sion was made to retain it. to the type of injury. 56
At age 9 years a rudimentary crown of 2_[ erupt- In the present study the findings were similar to

292 ROOT DEVELOPMENT FOLLOWING TRAUMA: Zilberman et al.


those reported by Andreasen. *’6 The permanent in- development of the permanent tooth root. However,
cisors with affected root development comprised only when this factor was studied previously in relation
4.7% of the examined permanent teeth. The wide to mineralization defects on the permanent crowns
range of developmental stages (2-8) of the tooth buds 2no association could be established.
of the affected teeth suggests that the vulnerability The cases presented stress the need for close pe-
of the developing root is not directly related to its riodic clinical and radiographic examination, since
developmental stage. The severity of root malfor- some of the pathological conditions developed a long
mation may, however, be related to the severity of time after the trauma occurred. Parents should be
the trauma. In the present sample the children with informed of this fact because lack of awareness leads
severe disturbances in root development suffered an to noncompliance. These patients "disappear" and
extremely traumatic injury. only return when the clinical problem is already ful-
The possible explanation to this assumption ly evident.
might be the different mode of transmission of the
traumatic force to the enamel organ and to the Herr- This study was supported in part by a grant from the Joint Re-
search Fund of the Hebrew University--Hadassah School of Den-
wig’s epithelial root sheath. The trauma to the pri-
tal Medicine, founded by the Alpha Omega Fraternity and the
mary tooth is transmitted directly to the developing
Hadassah Medical Organization.
crown of the permanent bud due to the close prox-
imity of the primary tooth root and the developing Dr. Zilbermanis a senior lecturer, Dr. Ben-Bassatand Dr. Brin are
enamel organ. 5,6 This hypothesis was confirmed in a lecturers, orthodontics; Dr. Fuksis a senior lecturer, pedodontics;
previous report in which most of the mineralization and Dr. Lustmannis a senior lecturer, oral and maxillofacial sur-
defects were found in the incisal one-third of the gery, The HebrewUniversity. Reprint requests should be sent to:
Dr. YeruchamZilberman, Dept. of Orthodontics, The HebrewUni-
crown, regardless of the developmental stage of the versity, Hadassah Faculty of Dental Medicine, POBox1172, Je-
tooth bud. 1 In contrast to that, the effect of trauma to rusalem,Israel.
the Hertwig’s epithelial root sheath is the result of
the transmission of the traumatic force through the 1. Brin I, Ben-BassatY, Fuks A, ZilbermanY: Traumato the pri-
surrounding bone or through the primary tooth, maryincisors and its effect on the permanentsuccessors. Pe-
causing deflection or displacement of the permanent diatr Dent 6:78-82, 1984.
2. Ben-BassatY, Brin I, Fuks A, ZilbermanY: Effects of traumato
bud. Such a course of events requires a traumatic
the primary incisors on permanentsuccessors in different de-
force of a considerable magnitude. This element and velopmentalstages. Pediatr Dent 7:37-40, 1985.
the direction of the traumatic force are probably the 3. Nolla CM:The deve.lopment of the permanent teeth. J Dent
crucial factors in the observed root deformities rather Child 27:254-66, 1960.
than the developmental stage of the affected tooth 4. AndreasenJO: TraumaticInjuries of the Teeth, 2nd ed. Copen-
hagen; Munksgaard,1981, ch 9.
bud. 5. Smith RJ, RappR: A cephalometric study of the developmental
Another factor which could be of importance in relationship betweenprimary and permanentmaxillary central
the transmission of the traumatic force might be the incisor teeth. J Dent Child 47:36-41,1980.
length of the primary incisor root. In the investigat- 6. AndreasenJO, RavnJJ: Theeffect of traumatic injuries to pri-
ed sample, most of the primary incisors had fully mary teeth on their permanentsuccessors. II. A clinical and
radiographic followLup study of 213 teeth. ScandJ Dent Res 79:
formed roots or were in the early stages of root re-
284-94, 1971.
sorption at the time of the injury. This did not allow
evaluation of the effect of primary root length on the

PEDIATRICDENTISTRY:December 1986/Vol. 8 No. 4 293

You might also like