Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Roy King
In order of appearance:
Title/Description: On the Left, an as-Yet Unrestored Section of the Cathedral Can Be Compared
Religion and its influence on the manner in which people and cultures interact is a
fascinating topic that has been a focus of inquiry for historians and other scholars since the
beginning of written history. Few ways of approaching this discussion are more interesting than
an analysis of the effect that religious differences have on the art and architecture produced by a
culture. Throughout history, civilizations have created buildings that help them to worship their
god(s). Art and architecture can provide a lens through which to view the differences between
cultures and religions. Two religions where this lens is particularly useful are Christianity and
Islam. Despite the multitude of doctrinal similarities between these religions, they have been at
each other's throats for more than a thousand years. This conflict, which continues to this day,
can often obscure common ground between these two religions. However, one way that their
similarities can be highlighted and their differences appreciated is through an analysis of their art
and architectural history. There are four fundamental elements of a piece of art that, when
explored and compared with the same elements in other pieces, shed light not only on the pieces
themselves but also on the cultures and religions that produced them. Three of these four
elements: form, content, and function, are the practical representation of the context of a piece.
Form and content involve a description of the actual piece itself and the elements that make the
piece unique. Function relates to what the piece’s intended use is and context involves the
circumstances surrounding the piece, its creation, and its creator. Through an in-depth analysis of
the form, function, content, and context of Chartres Cathedral and the Dome of the Rock and
then a comparison of these elements, a more complete understanding of the similarities and
differences between the beliefs and values of these two religions and cultures can be achieved.
King 3
To begin, an explanation of the cultural significance of both the Dome of the Rock and
Chartres is necessary. The Dome of the Rock is built over an outcrop of bedrock in the middle of
Jerusalem known as the temple mount. This area is highly significant to Christianity, Judaism,
and Islam. Christians and Jews believe that this is the spot where Abraham demonstrated his
obedience to God by proceeding to offer his son Isaac as a sacrifice until God intervened to spare
Isaac’s life1. This is also the site of the Jewish temple of Solomon which was destroyed by the
Babylonians in 587 BCE and the later Temple of Zerubbabel which was ultimately leveled by the
Romans in 72 AD. Jews regard the temple mount as both a holy place and a tie to their
ancestors. Muslims believe that it is the place where Mohammad ascended to heaven to speak to
Allah during his “night journey.”2 All three religions have deep connections to either the Dome of
the Rock or to the temple mount as a whole but only Muslim pilgrims are allowed to enter the
Dome itself. Chartres on the other hand has deep religious connections to Christianity because
Chartres holds what Roman Catholic Christians believe to be a piece of Mary’s tunic. By visiting
Chartres and viewing Mary’s tunic, pilgrims believe they can establish a closer connection to
Christ.
The first way in which these two structures can be compared is through the lens of their
content. Like Chartres, the Dome of the Rock is an important pilgrimage destination. The
function of these sites as pilgrimage destinations influences their content. For example, both of
these structures contain ambulatories, which are a type of aisle with a low ceiling that runs
around the interior perimeter of the building. Ambulatories allow pilgrims to walk around the
interior periphery of the building while being separated from the worshipers in the center. To
1
The New King James Version, Genesis. 22
2
Stokstad, Marilyn, and Michael Watt Cothren. Art History. Pearson, 2018.
King 4
understand the Dome’s ambulatories, one must understand the Dome’s unique status as a holy
building. It isn't a mosque; rather, it is a Mashhad or holy shrine. This means that its fundamental
purpose is as a place for observing and contemplating, not worshiping. It is a place where
pilgrims connect more deeply with Mohammed the Prophet and Allah through contemplation of
the event the Dome is intended to memorialize. The ambulatories facilitate this contemplative
process: “The architectural design differs from that of a mosque, and the ambulatory
configuration is not suited for Muslim congregational prayer. It also does not fit easily into other
categories of Islamic religious structures.”3 Chartres’ ambulatories are somewhat different in that
they have a low balustrade that separates the aisles from the nave. This creates a more distinct
separation than the Dome’s ambulatory. Chartres’ more defined ambulatory exists because its
occupants must be more explicitly separated from other parts of the church where worship
services are conducted. This is because, unlike the Dome of the Rock, pilgrims to Chartres not
only participate in religious services but also observe these ceremonies; this necessitates both
more space and a more clear division between worshipers and spectators.
A logical continuation of a
3
Zeidan, Adam. “Dome of the Rock.” Encyclopædia Britannica, Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.,
16 Aug. 2021, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Dome-of-the-Rock.
King 5
the most interesting similarities between these two edifices is their use of arches. Chartres uses
arches to form the groin vaults and rib vaults that make the high ceiling possible. The arches used
to construct the Dome of the Rock are more delicate and heavily
much heavier than the wooden roof of the Dome of the Rock.
The second distinct formal element to discuss is the decoration and ornamentation both
internally and externally. Both of these buildings have very different two and three-dimensional
decorations. It is these differences that help to give an insight into the cultural differences
reflected in the buildings. Chartres employs sculpture and stained glass that depict stylized
depictions of people or animals as a serious crime.4 This doctrinal prohibition did not, however,
stop Islamic architects from decorating their buildings beautifully. The Dome of the Rock
incorporates exquisite calligraphy, elaborate geometric patterns, and arabesque designs. Chartres
on the other hand unabashedly embraces decorations in the form of humans and animals to
the natural world in no way diminishes the beauty of the Dome’s decorations. In fact, it facilitates
the creation of an abstract beauty that, but for Islam’s injunction against natural forms, might
never have been created to awe and inspire the contemplative observer. Chartres takes an
opposite approach using natural images, illuminated and sanctified with God’s divine light
shining through stained glass, to demonstrate the glory of God and the presence of the Divine in
all things. The most important of these aspects is the asserted equivalency between light and
proximity to God. The builders of Chartres felt that light was holy and that a holy building
should let in as much natural light as possible.5 This is why Chartres employs massive rose
windows with beautiful stained glass. Sunlight passing through these windows creates an almost
hypnotic light show throughout the cathedral as the sun arcs through the sky. These windows are
made possible by the flying buttress: a gracefully arching external buttress that holds in check the
4
Macaulay, Dr. Elizabeth. “The Dome of the Rock (Qubbat Al-Sakhra).” The Dome of the Rock
(Qubbat Al-Sakhra), Smarthistory, 8 Aug. 2015,
https://smarthistory.org/the-dome-of-the-rock-qubbat-al-sakhra/.
5
McFadden, Christopher. “The 39 of the Greatest Constructions of Gothic Architecture in the
World.” The 39 Greatest Constructions of Gothic Architecture in the World, Interesting
Engineering, 16 July 2020,
https://interestingengineering.com/the-39-greatest-constructions-of-gothic-architecture-in-the-wo
rld#:~:text=Gothic%20Architecture%20is%20a%20pan,broken%20up%20by%20overlaid%20tr
acery%2C&text=Pointed%20Gothic%20arches,glass%20windows%20were%20also%20commo
n.
King 7
natural outward buckling force of the church’s high main walls. This allows for the walls to be
The third and final way in which a comparison of Chartres and Dome of the Rock can
help shed light on the similarities and differences between Christianity and Islam is an analysis of
communion. However, before they participate in Mass, pilgrims walk through the symbolic
labyrinth, a type of circular maze. This symbolizes the challenging path through life that all
King 8
Christians must walk. Their path is illuminated by the celestial multicolored light from the rose
windows during the day or thousands of candles at night. This process is very interesting because
it has a very similar corollary in Islam. The ṭawāf is a ritual that involves walking or running
around a holy object or altar. This process is most famously done at the Kaaba in Mecca but it is
performed at other holy shrines as well, including the Dome of the Rock. This idea of walking
specific circular paths as a way to connect with the Divine is fascinating because it manifests
across multiple religions. While this practice makes an appearance in Christianity and Islam it
can also be seen in Buddhism with circumambulation at the Borobudur Temple or the Great
Stupa at Sanchi.
Another specific functional element of Chartres that is shared by the Dome of the Rock is
the belief in the structure’s ability to help a person reach favor in the sight of God. Pilgrims
believe that traveling to holy places like Chartres and achieving proximity to relics like the tunic
of Mary help them to gain favor in the sight of God.6 This belief that pilgrimage to holy sites will
garner favor from God is shared by Muslims and is a motivation for their pilgrimage to the Dome
of the Rock. When the function of these buildings is compared it becomes clear that there is a
As the form, function, and content of these two pieces are compared through the lens of
the context surrounding them, new insights can form regarding not just the pieces themselves but
the religions that created them. The need for both of these buildings to accommodate pilgrims in
their search for communion with God and enlightenment was paramount in their design. As these
6
The Editors of Encyclopedia Britannica, and Barbara A Schreiber. “Chartres Cathedral.”
Encyclopædia Britannica, Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc., 5 Aug. 2020,
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Chartres-Cathedral.
King 9
similarities are explored, common values are discovered. Pilgrimage and a desire for a
connection to light and the divine tie these two buildings together in a particularly compelling
way. The similarities discussed herein between these two edifices are just the tip of the iceberg
and many additional similarities can easily be shown. The formal and functional choices are a
direct reflection of the context in which the edifices were built. These formal and functional
choices directly influence the content of the piece. Thus the content, i.e., what a piece truly is, is
directly influenced by the context in which it is created. Given that so many elements of the
content are similar, it follows that contextual similarities will also be manifest between the two
edifices. These similarities demonstrate the existence of common ground between these very
different religions.
King 10
Works Cited
https://www.flickr.com/photos/modenadude/5323120952/in/set-72157625276151981.
BeautyOfislam, and Abu Huzaifa. “Overhead View of the Rock the Building Is Built Over.”
https://www.islamiclandmarks.com/palestine-masjid-al-aqsa/interior-of-the-dome-of-the-
rock.
Macaulay, Dr. Elizabeth. “The Dome of the Rock (Qubbat Al-Sakhra).” The Dome of the Rock
https://smarthistory.org/the-dome-of-the-rock-qubbat-al-sakhra/.
https://interestingengineering.com/the-39-greatest-constructions-of-gothic-architecture-in
-the-world#:~:text=Gothic%20Architecture%20is%20a%20pan,broken%20up%20by%2
0overlaid%20tracery%2C&text=Pointed%20Gothic%20arches,glass%20windows%20we
re%20also%20common.
National Catholic Register. “Road to Tradition.” Chartres Pilgrimage Offers a Traditional Route
https://www.ncregister.com/news/chartres-pilgrimage-offers-a-traditional-route-to-christ-
Scott, Rory, and O.P. Lawrence. “On the Left, an as-Yet Unrestored Section of the Cathedral Can
https://www.archdaily.com/578212/the-restoration-of-chartres-cathedral-is-a-scandalous-
Stokstad, Marilyn, and Michael Watt Cothren. Art History. Pearson, 2018.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Chartres-Cathedral.
Zeidan, Adam. “Dome of the Rock.” Encyclopædia Britannica, Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.,
Wallis, Frederic, and Margaret Wallis. “Chartres Labyrinth.” Chartres Labyrinth &
Symbolism,
http://www.labyrinth.org.nz/what-is-a-labyrinth/chartres-labyrinth-and-symbolism/.