Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Roy King
Throughout history, artists have looked to the works of those who came before them for
inspiration. Nowhere is this more true than the Renaissance, the “rebirth” of European art created
in the image of Greco-Roman antiquity. The Renaissance adds a new flavor to this idea of
retrospective inspiration in that it applies the principles of antiquity within another context. That
context, in the case of the renaissance, is Christianity. Many of the principles of Christianity run
counter to the values of classic Greek and Roman culture. In the renaissance popes
commissioned sodomizers to create scenes from old testament stories. The renaissance embodies
well as conflicts between the Greek and Roman cultural influences and the Christian scenes
whose creation they inspired. However, despite many of the social problems created by this
dichotomy, these influences allowed for the creation of amazing secular and non-secular pieces.
The obvious explanation that must be provided is why so much religious art was created if the
subject matter of that art flew in the face of many of the values of the cultures whose art
influenced the artists of the time. The explanation for this comes in the form of patronage. Artists
were being paid to create art predominantly by either religious figures or wealthy families who
wished to display their piety. As a result, many of the commissioners requested art that at least
had religious undertones if not outright telling a religious narrative. Another thing that these
patrons did was create competitions. One of these such competitions produced a piece that would
define the early renaissance, the Sacrifice of Isaac panel from the North doors of the Florence
Baptistry. Through a close analysis of the form, function, content, context, and a cross-cultural
comparison the way that this piece exemplifies all aspects of the renaissance as a whole and the
The first primary way of analyzing the Sacrifice of Isaac panel is through a study of its
context, the situation surrounding its creation. The Florence Baptistry is a colossal stone bastion
in the center of the city. Although the building itself was constructed in the 11th-century
additions were made throughout the following centuries. One of these additions was the colossal
decorated wooden doors on the north side of the building. These doors were decorated with large
gilt bronze reliefs depicting various scenes from the Bible. The artist of these doors was chosen
through a competition sponsored by the Arte di Calimala (wealthy cloth merchants). The contest
involved depicting the binding of Isaac from the book of Genesis using a specified amount of
cast bronze. There were rules about the dimensions as well but, aside from that, the artists were
free to make whatever stylistic and compositional choices they desired (Arora, 1). There were a
few competitors but the two most famous were Lorenzo Ghiberti and Filippo Brunelleschi.
Brunelleschi opted to split his metal up into three sections and cast the pieces separately and then
reattach them. Ghiberti on the other hand opted to cast the whole image from one piece. The
King 3
judges felt that Brunelleschi's attempts had not been a success, the piece had too much dead
space and the figures did not seem to fit together in the same scene. As a result, they chose
Ghiberti’s design over Brunelleschi's. This was not the end of Brunelleschi who would go on to
have an illustrious career as a painter but this would be his last major piece of sculpture. After
Ghiberti won the competition he was chosen to create 38 individual panels that would cover the
north and east doors of the baptistry. In these pieces, he would combine Greek cannon with
that uses naturalistic forms. The story lends itself to the renaissance principle of using art to
King 4
capture a moment in time. Ghiberti is able to use verisimilitude within his depiction because the
story within this scene can be told with a snapshot. This context of this piece is what makes its
The second primary lens through which to view the Sacrifice of Isaac panels is their form,
what they are made of and how they are made. These objects were made using a multi-step
process. First, a two-dimensional design was made, from that, a three-dimensional form was
extrapolated. At this point, the three-dimensional form, typically made from wax or wood, would
be pressed into sand or another similar material. At this point, the molten material, in this case,
bronze, an alloy of copper and tin, would be poured into the indentation and allowed to harden.
Once this had been completed and the material had solidified the cast was removed and the
imperfections were corrected. Once this had been done the object would be gilded. This process
was very dangerous and very expensive. It involved mixing the gold powder into mercury, liquid
at room temperature, and pouring the mixture over the bronze. Once the bronze piece had been
covered in gold and mercury the whole piece would be heated. The process of heating would
evaporate the mercury leaving a thin layer of gold behind. This would be repeated multiple times
until the requisite amount of gold had been applied. The evaporation process was very dangerous
because the mercury fumes were extremely toxic and there was not a reliable way to prevent
inhalation. However, despite the risk and the great expense, the end result was dazzling (Apley,
1). These techniques were used to create the images on the doors of the Florence Baptistry. These
characteristics also contain specific visual formal elements. Most clearly is the way that depth is
portrayed within the relief carving. This is not a very high relief carving but depth is shown in
one particular spot. Above the altar, there is an angel. This depiction makes a clear effort to
employ foreshortening. The angel appears to be flying out of the figure while still being on the
King 5
same level as all of the other figures. This type of foreshortening had not been seen in
two-dimensional art or sculpture since Greek and Roman times. In addition, the artist
demonstrates a clear understanding of proportion and naturalism within the human form. Take
for example Isaac, who kneels upon the altar, he clearly demonstrates a presence within the
piece. The way he slumps to his right as he turns to look pleadingly at his father makes the piece
come alive. The proportions of all of the characters represent at least an adequate understanding
of the anatomy of the human body. All of the characters seem to have a natural presence in the
way they interact with the other figures, the landscape, and even their clothing. All of these
formal elements represent a revival of classic art styles and techniques from the Greeks and the
Romans.
Successionally, an analysis of the content of the piece can provide an insight into the
piece as a whole. Content represents a continuation of the topic of form and encompasses what
all of the formal elements are used to create within the piece. Ghiberti combines all of the
elements that have been mentioned to create a poignant representation of the Sacrifice of Isaac.
The story goes that Abraham was told by God to sacrifice his only son to prove his faith in and
devotion to the lord. As Abraham prepares to sacrifice his son Isaac he is told by the lord not to
kill the boy. The lord presents another offering in the form of a Ram with its horn caught in a
thornbush. This story represents two key principles within Christianity, those principles being:
faith and mercy. This is a powerful and emotionally charged story and Ghiberti uses every tool
available to him to make that clear through his sculpture (Harris, Zucker, 1). This represents all
of the elements of the story in one snapshot except for the bottom left corner. The bottom left
depicts Abraham telling Isaac that he will be sacrificed, the emotion of this scene is clearly
shown with Abraham grasping Isaac’s sleeve and Isaac looking back at his father with a face of
King 6
dismay. The rest of the piece shows the story as a whole. In the bottom right, Abraham is shown
with Isaac kneeling on the altar and looking emotionally back towards his father. Abraham looks
down at his son with a face of determination in the midst of grief. Above father and son is the
angel rushing to tell Abraham not to sacrifice his son. The final part of the story is shown in the
top left of the piece in the form of a goat contorting with its head stuck in a bush. This piece
combines all of the elements of a somewhat complicated story within one composition in a way
Another way that this piece can be analyzed is through an investigation of its function.
This piece was created for two main reasons. The first reason is somewhat superficial but the
other one has more nuance. The first reason is to serve as a decoration of the Baptistry. This
building was one of the most important places in Florence with some of the greatest Florentine
people being baptized within its walls. These towering doors accentuated the power of the
Catholic church within the city of Florence and the devotion of the Florentin people to the
Church. The second reason is somewhat of an extension of the first. These doors were
that could be given to aid the church in exchange for partial or even complete remission of one’s
sins. Many of these large decoration projects were part of an indulgence on the part of the
patrons. These wealthy cloth merchants saw the funding of a project like the baptistry doors as a
way of making up for their misdeeds in the eyes of God (Arora, 2). This practice was very
common and wouldn't be challenged on any sizable scale until the protestant reformation of the
1500s. These doors were seen as a votive offering to the Catholic church. They would help the
populus as a whole remember the church and hopefully protect the cloth merchants from
retribution for their sins. The function is important because it provides an explanation for the
King 7
creation of these pieces within their context. It was important to the patrons that these
decorations be the best money could buy because they represented a ticket out of damnation.
Without a personal religious imperative there would be no reason for a competition, the
decorators would have taken the lowest bidder. Likely in fact, these decoration projects would
never have taken place in the first place. An understanding of the function of these pieces as
indulgences sets the stage for an understanding of all the other aspects that make them a
The final way this piece can be discussed is through cross-cultural comparison. The most
interesting cross-cultural comparisons involve comparing pieces that had very similar functions
within societies that are very different from each other. One such comparison can be made
between the Sacrifice of Isaac panel and the Winged Lamassu from the Citadel of Sargon II.
These are very different pieces with one being a small decorative panel within a door and the
other being a colossal piece of monolithic gypsum carved in the shape of a mythological
creature. However, their function and their employment within their respective structures are
similar. The Lamassu was placed at the entrance to the citadel and would tower over visitors to
the king as they entered the inner walls of the city. Just towering doors of the Baptistry leave
people entering the Baptistry awestruck. However, the most interesting similarity comes through
King 8
a comparison of the content of the two pieces. The Lamassu is a colossal man-bull-eagle creature
that represents an important part of Neo-Assyrian culture just as the story of the sacrifice of Isaac
represents an important part of Christian culture. In both cases, the goal of the piece is to show
values through emotion. The Lamassu attempts to show the Neo-Assyrian value of power and
dominance through a figure that appears powerful and dominant. In the case of the Binding of
Isaac panel, Ghiberti teaches the Christian values of mercy and obedience through the depiction
of a scene that embodies those values. The way that completely different cultures that would
likely not even recognize the other as a civilization employed art to perform the same function.
The way civilizations employ and value art represent the most uniting characteristics of human
life. The visual representation of powerful ideas within a culture is a uniting characteristic that
surpasses religion or societal differences. These two pieces are excellent examples of this effect.
King 9
Works Cited
Apley, Alice. “African Lost-Wax Casting.” Metmuseum.org, Metropolitan Museum of Art, Oct.
2001, https://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/wax/hd_wax.htm.
Arora, Dipra. “The Sacrifice of Isaac, by Filippo Brunelleschi & Lorenzo Ghiberti.”
https://dipraarora.medium.com/the-sacrifice-of-isaac-by-filippo-brunelleschi-lorenzo-ghib
erti-a7588c5de27d.
Schwabach, Associate Professor Emeritus Bruce. “Art History II.” Brunelleschi & Ghiberti,
https://courses.lumenlearning.com/arthistory2-91/chapter/bruelleschi-ghiberti-the-sacrific
e-of-isaac/.